of 25
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
1/25
Unit 9: Indemnification andInsurance (and Exculpation)
KRB: 508-520 & Associated
Codes
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
2/25
Indemnification v. Insurance v.
Exculpation Indemnification:
Corporation pays thedamages owed by D&Os
Prospective, ongoing orretrospective
May include legal fees
Big picture(s): whenmandatory & whenpermitted?
Insurance Third-party company
(insurance) pays for D&Osdamages
(State) public policy limitsscope
Moral hazard concerns
Exculpation: Damages claims are extinguished (or limited) by corporatecharter provision
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
3/25
Liability Limitation Statutes
DGCL 102(b)(7) provides that acorporation's articles of incorporation may
(but need not) contain: A provision eliminating or limiting the personalliability of a director to the corporation or itsstockholders for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a director ....
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
4/25
Liability Limitation Statutes
provided that such provision shall not eliminate orlimit the liability of a director:
(i) For any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the
corporation or its stockholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which
involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation oflaw;
(iii) under 174 of this title [relating to liability for
unlawful dividends]; or (iv) for any transaction from which the director
derived an improper personal benefit
Disney:conduct motivated by
subjective bad faith (i.e.,an actual intent to doharm)
intentional derelictionof duty, a conscious
disregard for onesresponsibilities
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
5/25
Noteworthy Points
Applies only to directors.
Although officers also are subject to a duty ofcare, they are denied exculpation by charterprovision.
Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc. (Del.):As to a defendant who is both a director and anofficer, a 102(b)(7) provision applies only to
actions taken solely in his capacity as a director.
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
6/25
Noteworthy Points
Limits only the monetary liability ofdirectorsequitable remedies are still
available A 102(b)(7) provision is an affirmativedefense
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
7/25
Indemnification Statutes
At common law, corporate employees wereentitled to indemnification for expensesincurred on the job, including certain legalliabilities, but directors were not.
Today, all states have statutory provisionsauthorizing director indemnification to some
degree.
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
8/25
Delaware Law: Coverage
As to suits by shareholders or third parties,145(a) authorizes the corporation acorporation shall have power to indemnify thedirector or officer for expenses plus "judgments,
fines, and amounts paid in settlement" of bothcivil and criminal proceedings. if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the
person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed tothe best interests of the corporation, and, with respect
to any criminal action or proceeding, had noreasonable cause to believe the persons conductwas unlawful
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
9/25
Delaware Law: Coverage
As to suits brought by or on behalf of thecorporation, 145(b) authorizes a corporationshall have power indemnification only for
expenses, albeit including attorney's expenses. if the person acted in good faith and in a manner theperson reasonably believed to be in or not opposed tothe best interests of the corporation
If the director or officer was held liable to the
corporation, he may only be indemnified with courtapproval
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
10/25
Delaware Law: Mandatory versus
Permissive Indemnification Under 145(c), the corporation mustindemnify a director or officer who "hasbeen successful on the merits or
otherwise." As for directors and officers who are
unsuccessful, check whether indemnificationis allowed by 145(a) or (b)
If so, the corporation may but need not indemnify the director or officer
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
11/25
Delaware Law: Advancement of
Expenses Under 145(e), the corporation may advanceexpenses to the officer or director provided thelatter undertakes to repay any such amount if it
turns out he is not entitled to indemnification.
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
12/25
Delaware Law: Indemnification by
Agreement 145(f) authorizes the corporation to enter intowritten indemnification agreements with officersand directors that go beyond the statute:
statutory indemnification rights "shall not bedeemed exclusive of any other rights" toindemnification created by "bylaw, agreement,vote of the stockholders or disinterested
directors or otherwise."
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
13/25
Waltuch
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
14/25
Waltuch: CFTC
Which operative section applies: 145(a),145(b) or 145(c)?
145(a) Sued by third parties
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
15/25
Waltuch: CFTC Litigation
How to square 145(a)s restriction thatpower to indemnify . . . if he acted ingood faithwith 145(f)s reservation thatthe powers granted in the othersubsections . . . shall not be deemedexclusive.
Consistency Statutory parsing
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
16/25
Opposing Canons of Statutory
Construction There are two opposing cannons [of statutoryconstruction] on almost any point. KarlLlewellyn
Canon #1: Remedial statutes should be liberallyconstrued so as to effect their purposes.
Canon #2: Rules in derogation of the commonlaw should be strictly and narrowly construed.
Grant of power 145(f) grants no new powers
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
17/25
Waltuch: The CFTC Proceeding
Can Waltuch be indemnified per the agreement?
Would indemnification per Article 9 be inconsistent withthe 'scope' of the corporation's power to indemnify, as
delineated in 145(a)? Yes. Where the statute requires good faith, as it does in
both subsections (a) and (b), an agreement that purportseven by implication to authorize indemnification for non-good faith conduct is inconsistent with the scope of the
statute. Why cant Waltuch try to prove he acted in good faith?
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
18/25
Waltuch: Private Litigation
145(c): if successful on the merits orotherwise in defense of any action . . . Heshall be indemnified against expenses . . .reasonably incurred . . .
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
19/25
Waltuch: Private
Holding?
"The only question a court may ask is what theresult [of the underlying litigation] was, not why it
was." Unlike subsections (a) and (b), there is no good
faith limitation under 145(c).
Accordingly, success for purposes of subsection
(c) does not require "moral exoneration." It only requires escape.
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
20/25
The Good Faith Provision
Why did the legislature omit a requirement of good faithfrom the mandatory indemnification provision in Section145(c)?
Avoid collateral litigation? Do not chill directors from taking risks.
Encourage people to serve as directors of Delawarecorporations, and thereby also encourageincorporators to incorporate in Delaware, by providingthem with maximum protection.
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
21/25
Waltuch: Misreading Article 9th?
The Corporation shall indemnify . ..except in relation to matters . . . he shallbe adjudged . . . liable for negligence ormisconduct in the performance of a duty.
He paid $100,000 to the CFTC & agreedto a ban. Isnt that an adjudication of
wrongdoing? Why not so hold?
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
22/25
Citadel: Background Law
What do 145(b) and (c) provide If he loses, under b, he cant get indemnified for this
kind of suit
If he wins, under c, he must be indemnified for thiskind of suit
Can Paragraphs 5 & 7, read together with145(e) mean that the corporation mayindemnifywhen he loses (or must?)
What is the upshot? Corporation must advance pursuit to Paragraph 7,
even though if he loses, he will have to return.
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
23/25
Citadel
How could we have drafted paragraphs 5and 7 to achieve a reasonable result anddecrease the likelihood of litigation?
What did the parties want?
How did they fail?
Paragraph 5 doesnt distinguish between
successful and unsuccessful claims Paragraph 7 should have provided that you get
advances, but if you lose, you must return them.
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
24/25
Drafting
Lets give it a try!
The Corporation shall not be obligated
under this Agreement to make a paymentin regard to any liability or expense of theAgent: (e) . . .
Costs and expenses (including AFs)incurred by the Agent . . .
8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8
25/25
Insurance
If you were running an insurance companythat wrote D&O policies, how would youmanage your business to minimizepayouts?