+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Corporations Unit 8

Corporations Unit 8

Date post: 08-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: atjoeross
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 25

Transcript
  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    1/25

    Unit 9: Indemnification andInsurance (and Exculpation)

    KRB: 508-520 & Associated

    Codes

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    2/25

    Indemnification v. Insurance v.

    Exculpation Indemnification:

    Corporation pays thedamages owed by D&Os

    Prospective, ongoing orretrospective

    May include legal fees

    Big picture(s): whenmandatory & whenpermitted?

    Insurance Third-party company

    (insurance) pays for D&Osdamages

    (State) public policy limitsscope

    Moral hazard concerns

    Exculpation: Damages claims are extinguished (or limited) by corporatecharter provision

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    3/25

    Liability Limitation Statutes

    DGCL 102(b)(7) provides that acorporation's articles of incorporation may

    (but need not) contain: A provision eliminating or limiting the personalliability of a director to the corporation or itsstockholders for monetary damages for

    breach of fiduciary duty as a director ....

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    4/25

    Liability Limitation Statutes

    provided that such provision shall not eliminate orlimit the liability of a director:

    (i) For any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the

    corporation or its stockholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which

    involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation oflaw;

    (iii) under 174 of this title [relating to liability for

    unlawful dividends]; or (iv) for any transaction from which the director

    derived an improper personal benefit

    Disney:conduct motivated by

    subjective bad faith (i.e.,an actual intent to doharm)

    intentional derelictionof duty, a conscious

    disregard for onesresponsibilities

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    5/25

    Noteworthy Points

    Applies only to directors.

    Although officers also are subject to a duty ofcare, they are denied exculpation by charterprovision.

    Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc. (Del.):As to a defendant who is both a director and anofficer, a 102(b)(7) provision applies only to

    actions taken solely in his capacity as a director.

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    6/25

    Noteworthy Points

    Limits only the monetary liability ofdirectorsequitable remedies are still

    available A 102(b)(7) provision is an affirmativedefense

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    7/25

    Indemnification Statutes

    At common law, corporate employees wereentitled to indemnification for expensesincurred on the job, including certain legalliabilities, but directors were not.

    Today, all states have statutory provisionsauthorizing director indemnification to some

    degree.

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    8/25

    Delaware Law: Coverage

    As to suits by shareholders or third parties,145(a) authorizes the corporation acorporation shall have power to indemnify thedirector or officer for expenses plus "judgments,

    fines, and amounts paid in settlement" of bothcivil and criminal proceedings. if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the

    person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed tothe best interests of the corporation, and, with respect

    to any criminal action or proceeding, had noreasonable cause to believe the persons conductwas unlawful

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    9/25

    Delaware Law: Coverage

    As to suits brought by or on behalf of thecorporation, 145(b) authorizes a corporationshall have power indemnification only for

    expenses, albeit including attorney's expenses. if the person acted in good faith and in a manner theperson reasonably believed to be in or not opposed tothe best interests of the corporation

    If the director or officer was held liable to the

    corporation, he may only be indemnified with courtapproval

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    10/25

    Delaware Law: Mandatory versus

    Permissive Indemnification Under 145(c), the corporation mustindemnify a director or officer who "hasbeen successful on the merits or

    otherwise." As for directors and officers who are

    unsuccessful, check whether indemnificationis allowed by 145(a) or (b)

    If so, the corporation may but need not indemnify the director or officer

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    11/25

    Delaware Law: Advancement of

    Expenses Under 145(e), the corporation may advanceexpenses to the officer or director provided thelatter undertakes to repay any such amount if it

    turns out he is not entitled to indemnification.

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    12/25

    Delaware Law: Indemnification by

    Agreement 145(f) authorizes the corporation to enter intowritten indemnification agreements with officersand directors that go beyond the statute:

    statutory indemnification rights "shall not bedeemed exclusive of any other rights" toindemnification created by "bylaw, agreement,vote of the stockholders or disinterested

    directors or otherwise."

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    13/25

    Waltuch

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    14/25

    Waltuch: CFTC

    Which operative section applies: 145(a),145(b) or 145(c)?

    145(a) Sued by third parties

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    15/25

    Waltuch: CFTC Litigation

    How to square 145(a)s restriction thatpower to indemnify . . . if he acted ingood faithwith 145(f)s reservation thatthe powers granted in the othersubsections . . . shall not be deemedexclusive.

    Consistency Statutory parsing

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    16/25

    Opposing Canons of Statutory

    Construction There are two opposing cannons [of statutoryconstruction] on almost any point. KarlLlewellyn

    Canon #1: Remedial statutes should be liberallyconstrued so as to effect their purposes.

    Canon #2: Rules in derogation of the commonlaw should be strictly and narrowly construed.

    Grant of power 145(f) grants no new powers

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    17/25

    Waltuch: The CFTC Proceeding

    Can Waltuch be indemnified per the agreement?

    Would indemnification per Article 9 be inconsistent withthe 'scope' of the corporation's power to indemnify, as

    delineated in 145(a)? Yes. Where the statute requires good faith, as it does in

    both subsections (a) and (b), an agreement that purportseven by implication to authorize indemnification for non-good faith conduct is inconsistent with the scope of the

    statute. Why cant Waltuch try to prove he acted in good faith?

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    18/25

    Waltuch: Private Litigation

    145(c): if successful on the merits orotherwise in defense of any action . . . Heshall be indemnified against expenses . . .reasonably incurred . . .

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    19/25

    Waltuch: Private

    Holding?

    "The only question a court may ask is what theresult [of the underlying litigation] was, not why it

    was." Unlike subsections (a) and (b), there is no good

    faith limitation under 145(c).

    Accordingly, success for purposes of subsection

    (c) does not require "moral exoneration." It only requires escape.

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    20/25

    The Good Faith Provision

    Why did the legislature omit a requirement of good faithfrom the mandatory indemnification provision in Section145(c)?

    Avoid collateral litigation? Do not chill directors from taking risks.

    Encourage people to serve as directors of Delawarecorporations, and thereby also encourageincorporators to incorporate in Delaware, by providingthem with maximum protection.

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    21/25

    Waltuch: Misreading Article 9th?

    The Corporation shall indemnify . ..except in relation to matters . . . he shallbe adjudged . . . liable for negligence ormisconduct in the performance of a duty.

    He paid $100,000 to the CFTC & agreedto a ban. Isnt that an adjudication of

    wrongdoing? Why not so hold?

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    22/25

    Citadel: Background Law

    What do 145(b) and (c) provide If he loses, under b, he cant get indemnified for this

    kind of suit

    If he wins, under c, he must be indemnified for thiskind of suit

    Can Paragraphs 5 & 7, read together with145(e) mean that the corporation mayindemnifywhen he loses (or must?)

    What is the upshot? Corporation must advance pursuit to Paragraph 7,

    even though if he loses, he will have to return.

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    23/25

    Citadel

    How could we have drafted paragraphs 5and 7 to achieve a reasonable result anddecrease the likelihood of litigation?

    What did the parties want?

    How did they fail?

    Paragraph 5 doesnt distinguish between

    successful and unsuccessful claims Paragraph 7 should have provided that you get

    advances, but if you lose, you must return them.

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    24/25

    Drafting

    Lets give it a try!

    The Corporation shall not be obligated

    under this Agreement to make a paymentin regard to any liability or expense of theAgent: (e) . . .

    Costs and expenses (including AFs)incurred by the Agent . . .

  • 8/7/2019 Corporations Unit 8

    25/25

    Insurance

    If you were running an insurance companythat wrote D&O policies, how would youmanage your business to minimizepayouts?


Recommended