Technische Universität München
Cost of coexistence in Germany
Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München
Technische Universität München
2
Introduction
• Statement of the EC (2003):“In principle, farmers should be able to cultivate the types of agricultural crops they choose – be it GM crops, conventional or organic crops”
• In the same document:“to provide European consumers with a real choice between GM and non-GM food"
Technische Universität München
3
Introduction ctd
• In order to prevent outcrossing and adventitious presence -> Coexistence measures
• BUT:– Different Coexistence measures = different costs
– Different Coexistence measures = different effectiveness
• Free choice = C.M. should not tip over the balance!
• Case study in Germany
Technische Universität München
4
GM cultivation in Germany
• GM cultivation = outlawed
• GM cultivation 2005-2008: Bt maize
• # farmers involved = ±90
• Area wise <1% of total maize area in Germany
• Obligatory registration @ government
Technische Universität München
5
German cultivation in 2008
Standortregister,http://apps2.bvl.bund.de/stareg_visual_web/data.do
Technische Universität München
6
Sampling strategy
• Approached former Bt farmers through registration office
• Approached former Bt farmers through Innoplanta (farmers organisation)
• Approached neighbours through Bt farmers
• Face to face interviews
• Total Sample Size: 47 farmers. 27 Bt, 20 non-Bt
Technische Universität München
7
Distribution
Not sampled
1-4 farmers
5-9 farmers
10-15 farmers
Technische Universität München
8
Our average farmSample Population
(sampled states)
Farm type Mixed (80%)
Farm focus Milk (44%) or cereals (40%)
Farm land 1147 (897) ha 71 ha
Percentage rented 65% 70%
Maize area 218 (209) ha
People employed on farm
22 (21) 3.3
Technische Universität München
9
Our average farmer
Job experience 31 (13) years
Age 51 (11) years
Sex Male
Education level University of applied science
Profit/Operating income >€ 60,000 (75%)>€ 100,000 (45%)
Technische Universität München
10
Technische Universität München
11
Attitudes of farmers
Technische Universität München
12
Reasons for non Bt
Technische Universität München
13
Coexistence measures: Burden
Technische Universität München
14
Measure Time (h/year) Cost (€/ha)
Neighbour informing 6.2 13.0 11.93 32.92Informing rangers 5.3 13.9 7.58 12.52Registering 9.5 39.1 4.22 7.91
Liability 6.1 12.9 1.21 1.63
150 meter distance 3.4 5.3 1.47 3.10
300 meter distance 5.0 10.5 5.70 14.98
Goverment permission 5.1 11.7 1.94 3.41
Separate storage seeds 0.7 0.87 1.36 3.10
Separate storage yield 2.6 4.7 3.72 6.90
Cleaning machines 8.0 11.4 20.94 41.20Volunteer control 2.6 4.7 4.35 9.20
Record keeping 19.0 46.0 6.69 13.87
Waiting/Rotation 1861.8 5551.8 130.9 351.44
Top 4
Technische Universität München
15
Measure Time (h/year) Cost (€/ha)
Neighbour informing 6.2 13.0 11.93 32.92
Informing rangers 5.3 13.9 7.58 12.52
Registering 9.5 39.1 4.22 7.91
Liability 6.1 12.9 1.21 1.63150 meter distance 3.4 5.3 1.47 3.10300 meter distance 5.0 10.5 5.70 14.98
Goverment permission 5.1 11.7 1.94 3.41Separate storage seeds 0.7 0.87 1.36 3.10Separate storage yield 2.6 4.7 3.72 6.90
Cleaning machines 8.0 11.4 20.94 41.20
Volunteer control 2.6 4.7 4.35 9.20
Record keeping 19.0 46.0 6.69 13.87
Waiting/Rotation 1861.8 5551.8 130.9 351.44
Bottom 4
Technische Universität München
16
Regression analysis: informing the neighboursModel
Effects
Intercept Number of
neighbours
(N)
Farm size (S
in ha)
Interaction
(N*S)
Adjusted R2
T = ß0+ß1*N 128 (53)* 7.5 (2.1)** - - 0.33
T = ß0+ß1*S 199 (92)* - 0.02 (0.05) - -0.03
T = ß0+ß1*N+ ß2*S33 (92) 8.2 (2.2)** 0.06 (0.05) - 0.35
T = ß0+ß1*N+
ß2*S+ ß3*N*S-36 (87) 14 (3.1)*** 0.21 (0.07)** -0.01 (0.005)* 0.48
Technische Universität München
17
Correlation analysis
• Analyse correlation of Likert scale with farm characteristics (kendall‘s tau, non parametric)
Isolation
distance 150 mLiability
Requesting
government
permission
Waiting for two
years
Farm size -0.26 0.07 0.06 -0.39*
% GM maize
planted-0.12 -0.07 0.29 0.14
% area maize 0.20 -0.31 -0.19 0.03
Technische Universität München
18
Summary
• Small sample, but still sampled roughly 30% of all Bt-farmers in Germany
• Results, so far, seem mostly consistent
• Coexistence measures overall seem not to bother farmers too much
• Farm size is not always an important characteristic