Date post: | 17-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | barnaby-taylor |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Course on Carbon dioxide to Chemicals and Fuels
PRESENTATION - SIX27TH February 2014
On Line Course of NCCR(Total Number of Projections for this Lecture is 32)
FOCUS
This Lecture mainly deals with reforming of carbon dioxide with
methane for synthesis gas
COVERAGE
THERMODYNAMICSTEMPERATURE RANGE
CATALYST SYSTEMSROLE OF THE COMPONENTS
OTHER RELEVANT REACTIONSREACTORS
Reproduced from Hongyan Ma presentation
Halmann, Martin M. (1993). "Carbon Dioxide Reforming". Chemical fixation of carbon dioxide: methods for recycling CO2 into useful products. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-4428-2
Carbon dioxide reforming (dry reforming) is for producing synthesis gas by the reaction of CO2 with hydrocarbons especially methane. Synthesis gas is conventionally produced via the steam reforming of naphtha. This has relevance to the concern on the greenhouse gases to global warming. It is a method of replacing steam as reactant with carbon dioxide.The methane carbon dioxide reforming reaction is:CO2 + CH4 → 2H2 + 2COHalmann, Martin M. (1993). Carbon di oxide reforming. Chemical fixation of carbon dioxide: methods for recycling CO2 into useful products. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-4428-2
DRY REFORMING OF CARBON DIOXIDE
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009)
Catalyst Technology for carbon dioxide reforming with methane to synthesis gas
Carbon dioxide Reforming Scheme
• O=C=O Methane
Catalyst(?)
SYN GAS (CO /H2)
TRANSPORT SECTOR AUTOMOBILES,DIESEL ENGINES
AEROPLANES
STORAGE Gas stations
Storage in gas Pressure vessels
RELEVANT REACTIONS• (1)CH4+ CO2↔ 2CO + 2H2 ΔH0
298=247 ΔG0=61770-67.3T
• (2)CH4+H2O ↔ CO + 3H2 =206;
• (3)CH4↔ C + 2H2 75; 2190-26.5T
• (4)2CO↔CO2+ C -171; 39810+40.9T
• (5)CO2+ H2 ↔ CPO + H2O 41; -8545+7.84T
• (6)CO + H2↔ C + H2O -131
• The first figure refer to the ΔH0298 in kJ/mol
• The second figure refer to ΔG0
• Reaction T (K)• DRM 913• Methane cracking (3) 830• Boudouard Reaction (4) 973• RWGS (5) 1093• Limiting temperatures for different reactions DRM
Catalyst component Proposed mechanism
Metal active site (M(as)) CH4 + 2M(as)↔CH3-M(as)+ H-M(as)
CH3-M(as)+ M(as)↔CH2-M(as) + H-M(as)
CH2-M(as) + M(as)↔CH-M(as)+H-M(as)
CH-M(as) + M(as)↔C-M(as) + H-M(as)
2h-M(as)↔ H2(g) +2M+(as)
Catalyst component and corresponding proposed mechanism
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009)
Catalyst component Proposed Mechanism
Support ( Acidic support)
Support ( BASIC SUPPORT)
CO(g)↔CO2(metal)
CO2(metal)↔CO(metal) + O(metals)
CO(metal)↔CO(g)
CO2(g) ↔ CO2(support)
CO2(support) + O2-(support) ↔CO3(support)
2-
2H(metal)↔ 2H(support)
CO3(support)2- +2H(support)↔HCO3
-(s)
+ OH-
(s)
CO(support)↔CO(g)
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009)
Catalyst component Proposed Mechanism
Promoter
CO(g)↔CO(support)+ O(promoter)
O(promoter) + C(metal) ↔CO(g)
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009
Catalyst Temp. (K)
Conversion % Remarks
NiO/CaO/CoO-MgO/MgO 873-1123 80-100(CH4) High selectivity Ru/SiO2/MgO/TiO2 973-1073 28-35 deactivation Co/SiO2/MgO-SiO2 873 41-46(CH4) Better than Ni Ir/Al2O3 873 18-50 preparation
Different types of catalysts used for the DRM reaction
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009
Characterization of DRM reaction catalysts
Catalyst type Techniques Aspects Monometallic supported catalysts Ni/CeO2,Pt/Al2O3,Ni/SiO2,Ru/SiO2,Ir/Al2O3
XRD,TPR,XPS,EPR,TPO,TPH Metal dispersion, reducibility, coke
Bimetallic supported catalysts Ni-Co, Ni-Rh
XRD,XRF,XPS,TG,DTA, chemisorption
Composition, phase, coke, metal dispersion
Metal oxide supported catalysts CoO-MgO/CeO2
TPO, XRD,XPS Resistance to C, phases
Promoted supported catalysts on alumina Ni-K,Ni-Sn,Ni-Ca,Ni-Mn
TG,TPH,TPR,XRD,TEM,TPO Carbon, active sites, reduction behaviour
Perovskite catalysts, LaNiOx, LaNiMgOx, LaNiCoOx, LaSrNiOx,LaCeNiOx
XRD,TPR,TPO,TEM,SEM Calcination temp, structure, phases, reversibility, sintering
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009)
Catalyst Technology for carbon dioxide reforming with methane to synthesis gas
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009)
Catalyst Technology for carbon dioxide reforming with methane to synthesis gas
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009)
Catalyst Technology for carbon dioxide reforming with methane to synthesis gas
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem, 1,192 (2009)
Catalyst Technology for carbon dioxide reforming with methane to synthesis gas
CO2 reforming on Ni/Cu catalyst
• Factors like addition of copper to supported Ni system surface geometry, electronic structure, the extent of CH2 species, and hydrogen spill over contribute to Ni-Cu/support catalyst in CO2 reforming.
1. 1 wt% Cu8 wt% Ni/siO2 stability >7600C2. active site is stabilized by Cu3. Carbon formation same as Ni and Ni/Cu4. Cu-Ni species inhibit the C formation5. Cu addition promotes CH4 cracking and inactive Coke does
not accumulate on Cu/Ni catalyst• H-W Chen et al., Catalysis Today 97,173 (2004)
• TD favours carbon formation• Noble metals and Ni alleviate this problem
Summary of Catalytic Reforming of CO2/CH4
CatalystCO2/CH4
conversion (%)
Temp (K)
Ni/NaY 1:1 84.0 873Ni/Al2O3 1:1 36.3 873Ni/SiO2 1:1 14.9 873Pd/NaY 1:1 29.2 873Pt/NaY 1:1 156.3 873KNiCa/Al2O3 1:1 17 923KNiCa/SiO2 1:1 21 923KNiCa/ZSI 1:1 78 923Rh/TiO2 1:1 88.2 893Rh/SiO2 1:1 5.1 893Rh/Al2O3 1:1 85.1 893Ni/Al2O3 1:1 80−90 1050Pd/Al2O3 1:1 70−75 1050Ru/Al2O3 1:1 60−70 1050Rh/Al2O3 1:1 85−90 1050Ir/Al2O3 1:1 85−90 1050
Wang et al, Energy & Fuels, 10,896 (1996)
Catalyst Conversion % Temperature, K Ni/NaY/Al2O3/SiO2/ 15-85 873 Pd/NaY/Al2O3/MgO 29, 70-75,84 873,1050,963 Pt/NaY/MgO 156,85 873,963 Rh/TiO2/SiO2/Al2O3 88,5,85 893 Ni/Al2O3/MgO-Al2O3/CaO-Al2O3/CaO-TiO2Al2O3 75,,100,86,88,100 1050,1213 Ru/Al2O3/Eu2O3/MgO 60,75,90, 1050,923,963 Ir/Eu2O3/Al2O3/ 88,85 1000,1050
Table Catalytic reforming of CO2/CH4 with 1:1 mixture on various catalysts collected from literature
Co,MgO/C 1:1 65−75 923Ni/CaO-MgO 1:1 80 1123Rh/Al2O3 1:1 85 1073Ru/Al2O3 1:1 83 1073Ru/Eu2O3 1:1 75 923Ir/Eu2O3 1:1 88 1000Ru/MgO 1:1 90 963Rh/MgO 1:1 88 963Pt/MgO 1:1 85 963Pd/MgO 1:1 84 963Ni/Al2O3 2.38:1 100 1213Ni/MgO−Al2O3 2.38:1 86 1211Ni/CaO−Al2O3 2.01:1 88 1211Ni/CaO−TiO2−Al2O3 2.01:1 100 1223
Summary of Catalytic Reforming of CO2/CH4
Wang et al, Energy & Fuels, 10,896 (1996)
metal activity metal loading (wt %) temp (K)
1. Al2O3 Rh > Pd > Ru > Pt > Ir 1 823 Rh>Pd>Pt>Ru 0.5−1 823−973Ir > Rh > Pd > Ru 1 1050 Ni>Co >>Fe 9 773−973Ni>Co>> Fe 10 1023Ru > Rh 0.5 873Ru > Ru 0.5 923−10732. SiO2 Ru > Rh > Ni > Pt > Pd 1 973Ni > Ru > Rh >Pt > Pd >> Co 0.5 8933. MgO Rh > Ru > Ir > Pt > Pd 0.5 1073Ru > Rh > Ni > Pd > Pt 1 973 Ru> Rh ~Ni > Ir > Pt > Pd 1 823Ru > Rh > Pt > Pd 1 9134. Eu2O3 Ru > Ir 1−5 873−9735. NaY Ni > Pd > Pt 2 873
Catalytic Activities of Metals on Various Supports
Wang et al, Energy & Fuels, 10,896 (1996)
Effect of Support on Catalyst Activity
activity ordertemp (K) metal loading (wt %)
Ru Al2O3 > TiO2 > SiO2 893 0.5TiO2 > Al2O3 > SiO2 893 0.5Pd TiO2 > Al2O3 > NaY > SiO2 > MgO > Na-ZSM-5 773 5TiO2 > Al2O3 > SiO2 > MgO 773 1Rh
YSZ > Al2O3 >TiO2 >SiO2>> MgO 923 0.5
Al2O3 > SiO2 > TiO2 > MgO 773 1Ni Al2O3 > SiO2 800−1000 40Al2O3 > SiO2 873 10NaY > Al2O3 > SiO2 873 2SiO2 > ZrO2 > La2O3 > MgO > TiO2 823 4
Wang et al, Energy & Fuels, 10,896 (1996)
Synthesis gas over Ni/ZrO2-SiO2
• Helium treatment –generate distribution of active Ni sites
• Heterogeneity of Ni sites on hydrogen treatment
• CO treatment carbon covered metallic sites deactivation
Dapeng Liu, Yifan Wang, Daming Shi, Xinli Jia, Xin Wang, Armando Borgna, Raymond Lau and Yanhui Yang, Internationl Journal of Hydrogen energy,37,10135 (2012)
CO2 reforming on Co-Pd/Al2O3
• Co containing promoted by noble metal (Pd) with respect to activity, selectivity, resistance to carbon formation Co-Pd/Al2O3 depend on composition and process conditions. Oxygenates are produced.
Sh.S.Itkulova et al., Bull Korean chem.soc., 26,2017 (2005)
Stable CO2 reforming over modified Ni/Al2O3
• Ni/Al2O3 promotedby C,Cu,Zr,Mn,Mo,Ti,Ag and Sn
• Cu,Co,Zr improved Mn reduces carbon formation
Jae-Sung Choi, Kwang-ik Moon, Young Gul Kim, Jae Sung Lee, Cheol-Hyun Kim, and David L.Trim, catalysis Letters, 52,43 (1998)
Table 2. Catalyst component and corresponding proposed mechanism.
Catalyst component Proposed mechanismMetal active site (M(as)) CH4+2 M(as) CH3-M(as)+H-M(as) ⇌
CH3-M(as)+M(as) CH2-M(as)+H-M(as) ⇌ CH2-M(as)+M(as) CH-M(as)+H-M(as) ⇌
CH-M(as)+M(as) C-M(as)+H-M(as) ⇌ 2 H-M(as) H2(g)+2 M(as)⇌Support Acidic support: CO2(g) CO2(metal) ⇌ CO2(metal) CO(metal)+O(metal) ⇌ CO(metal) CO(g)⇌ Basic support: CO2(g) CO2(support) ⇌ CO2(support)+O 2-
(support) CO⇌ 32-
(support) 2 H(metal) 2 H(support)⇌ CO3
2-(support) +2 H(support) HCO⇌ 3
- (support) + OH-(support)
CO(support) CO(g)⇌Promoter CO2(g) O(promoter)+CO(support) ⇌ O(promoter)+C(metal) CO(g)⇌
Mun-Sing Fan et al., ChemCatChem.,1,192 (2009)
Processes occurring in the catalytic membrane reactor during the combined POM/DRM reaction
In this work, we have performed first principle calculations to study the adsorption of hydrogen on combined TM-decorated B-doped graphene surface. We found that transition metals Ni, Pd and Co show the great advantage of both hydrogen adsorption and H spillover method in the hydrogen storage process. Our results show that all the calculated activation barriers are sufficiently low for the H diffusion along the Ni-Pd and Pd-Co paths, indicating that a fast H diffusion on the substrate can be achieved under ambient conditions. Moreover, the calculated desorption energies of the hydrogen molecules on these TM decorated B-doped surface are close to the energies required to obtain reversible storage at room temperature and hence the proposed TM decorated boron doped graphene surface will be a good candidate to enhance the reversible hydrogen storage capacity.
Different isotope dependences on reaction kinetics have been observed during RBM of pure Mg powder and Mg–Ti powder mixtures. For pure Mg, gas absorption depends on the isotope nature and the rls is assigned to H(D)-diffusion in MgH2 phase. In contrast, in presence of Ti, the diffusion lengths in MgH2 phase are strongly shortened due to the abrasive properties of TiH(D)2. Thus, gas absorption turns to be isotope independent and the rls is assigned to the milling efficiency.
Analysis of hydrogen and deuterium kinetic curves under isothermal conditions (548 K) has highlighted outstandingly fast reaction rates for the nanocomposite. Absorption is diffusion controlled whereas desorption depends on the Mg/MgH2 interface displacement.
Finally, we have shown by means of HP-DSC the superior cycling stability of 0.7MgH2–0.3TiH2 nanocomposite over 100 cycles. Though, the crystallite growth associated to cycling at moderate temperatures (<650 K) induces modifications in the absorption mechanism, which changes on cycling from extended MgH2 nucleation at Mg/TiH2 interfaces to H-diffusion across the MgH2 layer. Nevertheless, the composite material exhibits excellent kinetics and cycling properties as compared to pure Mg.