+ All Categories

Cox_AMT

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: crt0518
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 52

Transcript
  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    1/52

    Rural Challenges in EMS

    Air Medical Transport

    Jeffrey Coughenour MD FACSAssistant Professor of Surgery and

    Emergency MedicineMedical Director, Mitchell Trauma Center

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    2/52

    Disclosures

    Industry supported research

    Reflectance Medical, Inc. and ZOLL Medical

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    3/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    4/52

    Objectives

    History

    Utilization and scientific evidence

    Safety, quality measures and performance

    St. Anthonys Hospital, Denver, CO 1972First civilian air medical service

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    5/52

    Beginning

    US Army Air Corps

    Nicaragua to Panama, 1926

    Korea 22,000 Vietnam 800,000

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    6/52

    Common Theme

    Care under fire

    Far-forward surgical care

    Rapid transport to higher echelon of care

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    7/52

    Civilian Adaptation

    Dual role aircraft

    Civilian aircraft exclusive patient care andtransport: 1972

    R. Adams Cowley, Golden Hour

    Lerner EB, The golden hour: Scientific Fact or urban legend?

    Acad Emerg Med 8(7): 758-760

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    8/52

    Missouri

    1978 The Spirit of KC Life Flight

    Followed by St. Louis in 1979, MARC(ARCH)

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    9/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    10/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    11/52

    Missouri

    6thin the nation with 30 aircraft

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    12/52

    Why HEMS?

    Presumed superiority of care

    Time to definitive care

    Local resource utilization or availability

    But which patient actually benefits?

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    13/52

    Utilization

    Joint Position Statement

    Air Medical Physician Association

    American College of Emergency Physicians

    National Association of EMS Physicians

    American Academy of Emergency Medicine

    Appropriate and safe utilization of helicopter emergency medical services: ajoint position statement with resource document. Prehosp Emerg Care2013

    Oct-Dec;17(4):521-5

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    14/52

    Position Statement

    Patients benefit from the appropriateutilization of HEMS

    EMS and regional healthcare systems musthave and follow guidelines for HEMSutilization to facilitate proper patientselection and ensure clinical benefit

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    15/52

    Position Statement

    Clinical benefit may be provided by:

    Meaningfully shortening the time to delivery ofdefinitive care to patients with time-sensitive

    medical conditions Providing necessary specialized medical

    expertise or equipment to patients before

    and/or during transport Providing transport to patients otherwiseinaccessible by other means

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    16/52

    Position Statement

    That the decision to utilize HEMS is amedical decision, separate from theaviation determination whether a transport

    can safely be completed

    That HEMS must be fully integrated withinthe local, regional, and state emergency

    health care system

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    17/52

    How are we doing?

    EMS and regional systems should have andfollow guidelines

    Medical decision, separate from aviationdetermination of safety

    Integration with local, regional, stateemergency care system

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    18/52

    Guidelines

    Trauma Task Force, TCD System

    19 CSR 30-40.790

    Transport Protocol for Stroke and STEMI

    How well are they followed? I have no idea

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    19/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    20/52

    Literature

    Silicon Valley, CA, 947 trauma patients

    22.8% potential benefit, 33% DC from ED1

    LA pediatric trauma

    189 patients, 85% minor injured, 33% DC fromED2

    1Shatney CH. The utility of helicopter transport of trauma patients from theinjury scene in an urban trauma system. J Trauma2002, 53:817-822

    2Eckstein M. Helicopter transport of pediatric trauma patients in an urbanEMS system: A critical analysis. J Trauma2002, 5: 340-344

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    21/52

    Literature

    North Carolina

    Small subset survival benefit1

    Pennsylvania

    3,048 penetrating trauma pts. over 8 years,helicopter longer transport times, no mortalitydifference2

    1Cunningham P. A comparison of association of helicopter and groundambulance transport with outcome of injury. J Trauma1997, 43(6): 940-946

    2Dula DJ. Helicopter versus ambulance transport of patients withpenetrating trauma. Ann Emerg Med 2000, 36(4): S76

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    22/52

    Literature

    Inter-facility transports similar outcomes,no significant mortality differencecompared to ground transport

    Arfken CL. Effectiveness of helicopter transport vs. ground ambulanceservices for inter-facility transport. J Trauma 1998, 45(4) 785-790

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    23/52

    Literature

    Netherlands, 446 patients

    Improved survival, estimated 5.4 additionallives saved per 100 HEMS deployments

    Giannakopoulos GF. Helicopter Emergency Medical Services save lives: outcomein a cohort of 1073 polytraumatized patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013

    Apr;20(2):79-85

    .

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    24/52

    Cochrane Review

    25 studies, considerable heterogeneity

    Low quality evidence

    an accurate estimate of overall effectcould not be determined.

    Galvagno Jr SM, Thomas S, Stephens C, Haut ER, Hirshon JM, Floccare D,Pronovost P. Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with majortrauma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 3. Art. No.:

    CD009228

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    25/52

    Utilization

    Trauma

    Physiology and injury pattern criteria

    Stroke and STEMI

    When GEMS transport to a capable facility maypreclude arrival within a therapeutic window(thrombolysis, PCI)

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    26/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    27/52

    Early or Auto Launch

    Partially responsible for poor utilization

    Over-triage

    No literature support Business/PR tactic

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    28/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    29/52

    Operating Models

    Public safety

    Hospital-based service (HBS)

    Community-based service (CBS) Hybrid or alternative

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    30/52

    Finances

    Costs often fixed

    Medicare reimbursement fee structurediffers rural and urban

    Urban $3,308 per trip plus $21.53 per mile

    Rural $4,962 per trip plus $32.30 per mile

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    31/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    32/52

    Safety

    1988 1997

    Average of 5 HEMS incidents/year

    1998 2008

    12.4 incidents/year

    22 fatal injuries 2009-2010

    Significant number of those related tohuman error

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    33/52

    Safety

    Human error 77%

    Weather, IIMC, CFIT

    Mechanical 17%

    Other 3%

    Undetermined 2%

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    34/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    35/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    36/52

    NTSB

    Scenario-based pilot training

    Safety management systems

    Flight data recording Aviation Digital Data Service (ADDS)

    NVIS

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    37/52

    NTSB

    Low-altitude infrastructure for HEMS ops

    Autopilot/Dual pilot operation

    HTAWS/TCAS

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    38/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    39/52

    Operations

    $800K 3 million

    Single engine

    Single pilot only

    Limited weathercapability

    Limited weight carriagefor medical equipment,

    fuel

    $4-6 million

    Twin engine

    2 pilot capability

    Instrument weathercapability

    Autopilot

    Longer range

    Higher critical carecapability (e.g. balloonpumps, ventilation)

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    40/52

    Safety

    What level does your provider operate?

    Are the aircraft equipped with the NTSB-recommended safety features

    Do you take an active role in knowing whois flying your patients?

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    41/52

    Canada

    Funded by government

    Centralized dispatch

    Twenty aircraft serving 21 million people Required Dual pilot, autopilot, IFR capable

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    42/52

    Canada

    ORNGE crash, northern Ontario

    Inexperienced pilots, night operations

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    43/52

    Quality

    Data analysis and benchmarking

    Administrative and peer review

    Medical control oversight

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    44/52

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    45/52

    74

    21

    SFL Helicopter 2014 Intubation Success 2nd Quarter

    1st Attempt Success

    2nd Attempt Success

    Failed (king)

    First & Second Attempt 95%

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    46/52

    Quality Measures

    Advanced airways supported by mechanicalventilation

    Bedside time for STEMI

    BP management for hemorrhagic stroke

    Glucose measurement in AMS

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    47/52

    Medical Oversight

    Dont intubate profound shock

    A, B, C B, A, C C, A, B?

    Ketamine is amazing Septic shock from a critical access hospital

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    48/52

    Performance

    Education

    CAMTS requiring professional certification CFRN, FP-C

    Mentorship program for new hires Live-tissue or simulation training

    Clinical interaction

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    49/52

    Performance

    Clinical Care

    Cardiac augmentation

    Transfusion

    High-risk OB

    Pre-hospital ultrasound

    POC ABG/VBG, lytes, coagulation

    Pharmacologic adjuncts

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    50/52

    Summary

    Early, helicopters added patient care skills,interventions

    Sophistication of EMS, may offer little morethan speed

    Evidence showing clear benefit ?

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    51/52

    Summary

    Safety, quality, performance allhelicopters and their operators are NOTcreated equal

    Take an active role in knowing who is flyingyour patients

  • 8/11/2019 Cox_AMT

    52/52