Date post: | 07-Aug-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | bercer7787 |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 1/343
I LATIN AMERICANWORLD MODEL
I PROCEEDINGS OF THEI SECOND NASA
SYMPOSIUM ONGLOBAL MODELLINGG E R H A R T B R U C K M A N N EDITOROCTOBER 7 1 0 7 9 7 C P - 7 6 - 8
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 3/343
LATIN AMERICANWORLD MODELPROCEEDINGS OF THESECOND IlASASYMPOSIUM O NGLOBAL MODELLING
GERHART BRUC KMA NN EDITOR
OCTOBER7 1 0 7 9 7 4
Views expressed herein are those of the contributors and not neces-sarily those o f the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
The Institute assumes full responsibility for minor editorial changes,
and trusts that these modifications have not abused the sense of the writers
ideas.
Internat iona l Inst i tu te for Applied Sy stem s Analysis
236Laxenburg Austria
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 5/343
PREFACE
The mathem atical m odel presented here is normative; the concern is no t with predict-
ing what w ll occur if th e contem porary tendencies of m ankind continue, but rather with
sketching a way of arriving at the final goal of a world liberated from backwardness and
misery.
Any lo ng-term forecast about the development of m ankind is based o n a view of th e
world rooted in a particular value system. By assuming that the s tructure of the contempo-
rary world and the set of values which sustains it may be linearly projected toward the
future, we are in fact taking a position. In this sense, the difference which is usually made
betwee n a projective an d normative model is essentially fallacious.
The idea of constructing this model springs from a meeting held in 197 0 in Rio de
Janeiro sponsored jointly by the Club of Rome and the Instituto Universitario de
Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro. The meeting analyzed and discussed the results of th e World
Model which was constructed by the group headed by Meadows at the Sloan School of
Management of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). As a result of the dis-cusion of th e basic assum ptions of th e World Model 111, a group of L atin Americans att end ing
the m eeting decided to assign the Fundacion Bariloche of A rgentina the work of con struct-
ing a world model th at enc orporated t he views expressed at th e meeting.
A Committee was formed composed of Helio Jaguaribe, Carlos A. Mallmann, Enrique
Oteiza, Jorge S aba to, Osvaldo Sunkel, Victor Urquidi, an d Amilcar Herrera, which in
Septem ber 1 97 1 issued a paper giving in general terms the fundam ental hypothese s and
variables t o be used in the Bariloche Model. This preliminary project was su bm itt ed to the
annual meeting of the Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO), held in
Buenos Aires in December 197 1.
In m id-1971, a meeting was held at the Fund acion Bariloche, atten ded by t he majorityof th e members of th e Com mittee as well as by som e of those wh o would later be involved
as authors in the project. T he meeting defined the essential features of th e Model to b e
developed. The Co mm ittee appo inted a Project Director, an d entru sted him with the task of
forming the group of specialis ts who would construct the model. In the final phase of the
project Hugo Scolnik was appointe d Co-Director of th e project.
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 6/343
While an individual au thor has repor ted on the m ain task assigned him, this in n o way
reflects the real participation t hat each ha d in the work. The hyp otheses and basic ph ilosophy
of the mod el were the product of a long a nd difficult collective task, and it is almost impos-
sible t o distinguish the individual contribution s.
The initial group which gave rise to the project constituted itself the reafter int o a
Consulting Com mittee, with the mission of periodically carrying o ut a critical analysis of the
progress of the work. Its criticisms and suggestions were a valuable cont ribut ion to the task
performed. I t is appropriate t o point o ut th at f inal responsibility for the ideas contained
in the model is wi th the authors .
An initial contribu tion was received from th e Club of Ro me t o carry out a s tudy onthe project s feasibility. Thereafter, th e execu tion of the project was financed in full by the
International D evelopment R esearch Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, C anada. The autho rs wish to
express their gratitude t o both institutio ns for the to tal academic freedom given them.
Amilcar Herrera
Buenos Aires, August, 1974
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 7/343
T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s
P r e f a c e
Opening RemarksT j a l l i n g K o o p m a n s
P a r t I P a p e r s P r e s e n t e d a nd D i s c u s s i o n s
I n t r o d u c t i o n a n d B a s i c A s su m pt io n s
o f t h e Model
A m i l c a r H e r r e r a
D i s c u s s i o n
P e t e r S i n t R a pp o rt eu r
T he F u n c t i o n i n g o f t h e M odel a n dt h e Demographic Model
ugo S c o l n i k L u i s T a l a v e r a
U r b a n i z a t i o n a n d H ou si ng
Diana Mossovich
D i s c u s s i o nO l i v e r B e r n a r d i n i R a p p or t e ur
Non-Renewable N at ur a l Re so urc esa nd P o l l u t i o n M e th od sA m i l c a r H e r r e r a
T he Long-Term E v o l u t i o n o f t h e P r i c e sof EnergyC a r l o s E S u 6 r e z
D i s c u s s i o nP e t e r F l e i s s n e r R ap po rt eu r
The Food Se c t o rG i l b e r t o G a l l o p i n
L a t i n Amer ican World Model :
T h e o r e t i c a l S t r u c t u r e an dEconomic Sec to rG r a c i e l e C h i c h i l n is k y
D i s c u s s i o n
W o lf ga ng B l a a s R a p p o r t e u r
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 8/343
I n f o r m a l D i s c u s s i o n E v en in g S e s s i o n )F e r e n c R a b a r , R a p p o r t e u r 3 7
T he E d u c a t i o n S e c t o rG i l d a Romero B r e s t 4 1
S p e c i a l R e p o r t o f A l t e r n a t i v e R unsG r a c i e l e C h i c h i l n i s k y a n d Hugo S c o l n i k 5 5
A s R e p o r t e d b y G. Bruckmann)
D i s c u s s i o n
W.D. Nordhaus , R ap por t e u r 57
P a r t : R e p o rt o n O t h e r M o d e l li n g E f f o r t s
P r o j e c t C R I S I S
R . C . C u r n o w . 61
F o r e c a s t i n g Work a t t h e S c i e n c e P o l i c y
R e s e a r c h U n i tJ o h n A - C l a r k 63
G l o b al M o d e ll in g i n R e l a t i o n t o t h eD e v e lo p i ng C o u n t r i e sM.S. Iy en ga r 167
Non-Economic and Economic F a c t o r s
i n S o c i e t a l D ev el op me nt : T heG e n e r a l P r o d u c t i o n F u n c t i o n
h r i s t o f G a s p a r i a n d J o h an n M i l l e n d o r f e r 175
M o d e l l i n g R e s o u r c e P r o bl e m s
.C . R o be r t s 189
IRADES
E l e on o r a B a r b i e r i M a s i ni 97
R e a l l o c a t i o n o f t h e World I n d u s t r yY. Kaya and M. I s h i k a w a 9 9
On a Mult i - Nat io n-Lin k Economic Model
A k i r a O n i s h i 49
A H e a l t h C a r e D e l i v e r y S ys te m- -o f t h e P e o p l e , b y t h e
P e o p le , f o r t h e P eo p l e
, I r w i n M. J a r e t t , A s s i s t e d by G a b r i e l l e M D 8 E l i a ) 2 7 1
A N ew Approach t o C i t i z e n I n vo lv e m en t i n E d u c a t i o n a nd
H e a l t h C a r e D e l i v e r y
H e l e n M. P e t e r s e n , G a b r i e l l e M. D 8 E l i a ,
i c h a e l J S c h u s s e l e , a n d I r w i n M. J a r e t t 291
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 9/343
Problems of Population Doubling: The WorldFood ProblemHans Linnemann 5
Contribution to the General Discussion on Wednesday9 October 1 9 7 4 on the Latin American WorldModel Developed by the Fundaci6n BarilocheArgentinaManfred H Siebker 1 1
A Comparison of Models and an Ecological ModelSamir I Ghabbour 3 1 3
AppendixA Agenda. 3 2 1
ppendix B List of Participants and Observers 3 2 5
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 11/343
Opening Remarks
T j a l l in g Koopmans
Le t me welcome you on beh al f of Pr of es so r Howard Ra if fawho r e g r e t s t h a t u n ex p ec t ed an d i m p e r a t i v e IIASA b u s i n e s s h a spreven ted h im f rom a t t e nd in g t h e Conference . However, h e haso f f e r e d u s some w r i t t e n s u g g e s t io n s a s t o t h e n a t u r e of t h eC o n fe r en c e . w an t t o welcome a l l who h a ve com e, i n t h e f i r s tp l a c e , P r o f e s s o r H e r r e r a a nd h i s c o l l e a g u e s f ro m t h e Fu n da ci 6nB a r i l o c h e who h av e made t h e i r i d e a s a v a i l a b l e f o r d i s c u s s i o na t t h i s C o nf er en c e. S e co n dl y, s h o u l d l i k e t o welcome t h ep a r t i c i p an t s f ro m many r e s ea r c h g r o u p s i n many co u n t r i e s whoa r e i n t e r e s t e d i n g l o b a l m o d e ll in g pr ob le m s. F i n a l l y , a word
o f w elcom e t o t h e IIASA s t a f f mem bers p r e se n t and t o t h o sewho w l l a t t e n d o r p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e v a r i o us d i s c u ss i o ns .
The c ha i rm e n o f t h e s e s s i o n s w l l be IIASA s t a f f members;a t f i v e o f t h e s e s s i o n s we w l l d i s c u s s v a r i o u s p a p e r sp r e s e n t e d a n d t h e w ork o f t h e F un d ac id n B a r i l o c h e . P r o f e s s o rBruckmann i s r e s p o n s i b l e a t IIASA f o r t h e work o n g l o b a lmodel l ing , and w l l c h a i r t h e l a s t t h r e e me et in gs which w l l
sum mari ze t h e i n f o r m a t i o n p r e s en t ed and a s sem b l e r e se a r chg r o u p s f o r v a r i o u s w ork o n g l o b a l m o d e l li n g .
would l i k e t o r e a d t h e s t a t e m e n t o f P r o f e s s or R a i f f aon t h e n a t u r e o f IIA SA 's i n t e r e s t , i n v o lv e m en t , a nd s u p p o r to f t h e s e r i e s of c o n f e re n c e s o n g l o b a l m o d e ll in g o f w h ic ht h i s i s t h e s ec on d. t r u s t t h a t many o f you w er e p r e s e n t a tt h e f i r s t c o n f er e n c e d e v ot e d t o t h e work o f P r o f e s s o r s M es ar ov icand P e s t e l . P r o f e s s o r Ra if f a s s t a t e m e n t i n d i c a t e s I I A S A ' si n t e r e s t i n s u p p o r ti n g and f a c i l i t a t i n g t h e work of manyr e s e a r c h g r o u p s i n g l o b a l m o d e ll in g .
T h i s i s t h e s ec on d g l o b a l m o d e l l in g c o n f e r e n c e h o s t e d byIIASA. Whi le g lo b a l mo del l ing i s n o t on e o f o u r m a j or p r o j e c t s ,it i s s om e th in g we want t o mo ni to r a nd c u l t i v a t e t o s e r v e t h es c i e n t i f i c co mm unity . IIASA i s p r o v i d i n g a f or um , c o n c e n t r a t i n gon t h e meth odo log ica l a sp ec t s o f g l o b a l model s . Among ou r owns c i e n t i s t s a nd s u pp or ti ng i n s t i t u t i o n s t h e r e i s a g r e a td i f f e r e n c e o f o p i n i o n a bo u t t h e m e r i t s o f l a r g e - s c a l e g l o b a l
m o d e l l i n g ;it
r a ng e s f rom e c s t a t i c s u p p o r t t o n e g a t i ve s k e p t i ci s m
The c on ce rn i n a l l t h e s e g l o b a l m o de ll in g e f f o r t s i s f o rp ro bl em s o f m ankind i n t h e d i s t a n t f u t u r e , a nd t h o s e c o n c e r n sa r e co n ce r n s o f ev e r yb o d y. They f o cu s o n a s p e c t s o f f o o d ,a g r i c u l t u r e , and t h e q u a l i t y o f l i f e ; t h e r e a r e t h e no-growthand t h e f u l l - g r o w t h ad v o c a t e s , and we f e e l we sh o u l d n o t i g n o r et h i s f i e l d o f e nd ea vo r. We d o n o t w an t t o f a v o r p r em a t ur e ly
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 12/343
one group over another. That is why we want to review in a
series of symposia various points of view, those of thedeveloped, the developing, the socialist, and the non-socialist
countries; we want to hear what the arguments are and to learn
about the various models. We want to obtain here the best
documentation of these modelling efforts so that advocates of
different points of view can come to understand other models.
The tendency is for too much rhetoric and not enough scientific
substance, and we are therefore trying to bolster the scientific
side by having clear documentation readily accessible. This
documentation, including computer software, will be made
available to all who are interested in the developed and
developing countries, in organizations, and so forth.
We are already working on segments of these problems from
the bottom up, for example our work in the fields of energyand water. Other attempts are being made from the top down.
We do not know how much top-down modelling we will do at IIASA
in the future. The present position is to find out what is
being done in the field and what has to be done in order to
ascertain what can be done here [at IIASA].
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 13/343
PART I: PAPERS PRESENTED AND DISCUSSIONS
Introduction and Basic Assumptions of the Model
Amilcar Herrera
When tne complex characteristics of the contemporary world
are analyzed, it can be seen that almost two thirds of mankind
live in misery and scarcity. Only recently has the minority
begun to perceive the negative effects of over-consumption
produced by increasing economic growth that is destroying the
human and natural environment. This inequality, which has
divided the world into developed and undeveloped countries,does not recognize rigid political boundaries. Some privileged
minorities of Third World countries enjoy consumption levels
equivalent to those of the upper classes of the developed
countries, while considerable sectors of the population of the
developed countries have not yet reached the full satisfaction
of their most basic material and cultural needs.
The world is experiencing exponential population growth
and consumption and an accelerated increase in environmental
pollution, the two latter phenomena being produced mainly in
the industrialized countries. For the first time in history,
we are faced with global problems which can be solved only by
action on a global scale.
As a result of this new global approach, some of the ideas
of the classic economists such as Ricardo and Malthus are again
current; according to Malthus the scarcity of natural resources
would lead eventually to a decreasing social return of the
economic effort, with the consequent delay and eventual halt
of growth. He also predicted that the growth of the population
and consumption (which have reached unprecedented levels) will
exhaust the earth s natural resources; according to him this
will probably occur in the near future. Although the natural
resources may not be exhausted before a historically significative
time period, pollution and the progressive deterioration of the
environment will provoke the collapse of the ecosystem. In
both cases, the result would be the same: catastrophic haltof growth, a massive increase in the rate of mortality of the
population and the general lowering of the average standard of
life to conditions existing prior to the industrial revolution.
These ideas caused various reactions, which in general
terms might be divided into two types. On the one hand, there
is the conviction that only a solidarious effort of all mankind
can successfully confront the dual problems of increasing the
living standards of the disposesed masses, and generating
forms of progress and value systems to halt the deterioration
of the human and natural environment. The second reaction,
found mainly in the developed countries, makes population growth
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 14/343
t h e f u n d am e n t al c a u s e o f wo r ld p r ob l em s . They b e l i e v e t h a tt h e c o n t r o l o f t h i s g ro w t h i s a n i n d i s p e n s a b l e p r e r e q u i s i t e f o ra v o i d in g t h e c a t a s t r o p h e . The c o n t r o l o f p o l l u t i o n , t h e r a t i o n a l
u s e o f t h e r e s o u r c e s , a nd t h e l i k e a r e o n l y c om ple men ta ryc o r r e c t i v e m ea su re s .
Those who s h a r e t h i s p o s i t i o n d o n o t d o ub t t h e c e n t r a lv a l u e s o f t h e d e v e lo p e d w o rl d . T h e i r m ai n c o n t e n t i o n so me ti me s
c l e a r l y s t a t e d i s t h a t t h e r e a r e n a t u r a l b a r r i e r s t o economic
g ro wt h an d t h e s e g i v e l i t t l e h op e t o t h e b ack wa rd c o u n t r i e s o f
r e a c h i n g t h e l e v e l s o f w e l f a r e e nj o ye d by t h e ad va nc ed c o u n t r i e s .
T he se f a t a l i s t i c s t a t e m e n t s c o n t a i n a fu nd am en ta l f a l l a c y .
W h e r e t h e r e i s a g l o b a l s e t o f p ro bl em s, t h e r e e x i s t s s u f f i c i e n t
d e g r e es o f f re edo m t h a t make p o s s i b l e d i f f e r e n t a l t e r n a t i v es o l u t i o n s . The s o l u t i o n c h os e n i s a l w a y s d e t e r m i n e d by t h eeconomic a nd p o l i t i c a l c o n d i t i o n s o f t h o s e i n v o lv e d i n t h ed e c i s i o n p r oc e s s .
When M al th us s t a t e d h i s t h e o r y o f s c a r c i t y ( wh ic h h a s a
s c i e n t i f i c b a s e t h a t i s n e i t h e r b e t t e r n o r w or se t h a n t h e on eon wh ich t h e c u r r e n t c a t a s t r o p h i s t i c p o s i t i o n s a r e f o un de d) ,
t h e s o l u t i o n h e p o s t u la t e d was n o t t h e o n l y p o s s i b l e o ne a sh i s t o r y l a t e r d e m o n st r a t es . H i s t o r y a l s o showed t h a t M a rx 's
r e f u t a t i o n , w hi ch com es a b o u t a f ew d e c a d e s a f t e r M al t h us , wasn o t v a l i d . Viewing t h e s i t u a t i o n w i t h h i s t o r i c a l pe r s p ec t i v e ,
we now see t h a t M a l t hu s ' p o s i t i o n w as a d va nt ag eo us t o t h e
i n t e r e s t s o f t h e B r i t i s h d om in an t c l a s s e s . M ar x' s r e f u t a t i o nd e r i v e s n o t s o much f rom a d i f f e r e n t a p p r e c i a t i o n o f r e a l i t y( wh ic h d i d n o t g o b ey ond a t h e o r y w i t h scarce e m p i r i c a l
f o u n da t i o n) b u t r a t h e r f ro m a d i f f e r e n t c o n c ep t io n o f t h e f o r c e s
t h a t d e t e r m i n e t h e d e ve l op m en t o f m an ki nd .
M a lt hu s ' t h e o ry was i m p l i c i t l y o r e x p l i c i t l y u s ed by t h ed om in an t c l a s s e s o f h i s t i m e a n d t i n f l u e n c e d s a l a r y an d
s o c i a l p o l i c i e s du r i n g most o f t h e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y . t sf i n a l g o a l was t h e m ai nt en an ce o f t h e s t a t u s q uo .
T he f o r m u l a t i o n o f a l t e r n a t i v e s o l u t i o n s stemmed f ro m
a n i d e o l o g i c a l c l im a t e s t i m u la t e d by t h e s t r u g g l e o f s o c i a l
c l a s s e s a nd g r ou ps w i l l i n g t o r e j e c t a n o r d e r w h i ch k e p t t he m
a t subhum an l i f e l e v e l s . T he a c kn ow l ed g me n t t h a t m i s e r y Was ac on se qu en ce o f t h e p r e v a i l i n g s o c i a l o r g a n i z a t i o n , r a t h e r t h a n
a p r o d u c t o f a u n m o d i f i a b l e n a t u r a l l a w , b ec om es a d yn am ice l e m e n t o f c h an g e s i n c e t e m er g es a t a h i s t o r i c a l moment whent h e o pp r es s ed s o c i a l s e c t o r s become a war e o f t h e i r s t r e n g t ha n d o b j e c t i v e s . They a r e t h e o n e s who, a f t e r a n u n c e a si n g
s t r u g g l e , w i l l b e a b l e t o m od if y some o f t h e n e g a t i v e t r a i t so f t h e s o c i e t y g e ne r a t e d by t h e i n d u s t r i a l r e v o l u t i on .
I n many r e s p e c t s t h e c o nt em po ra ry s i t u a t i o n i s s i m i l a r .
E ven t h o u gh o n e may a ss um e t h a t t h e c u r r e n t c o u r s e o f m an ki nd
p r e s e n t s t h e d an ge r of a c o l l a p s e o r s e r i o u s l a c k s o f e q u i l i b r i u m
i n t h e n a t u r a l e co sy st em , t h i s do e s n o t i mp ly t h a t t h e r e i s as i n g l e s o l u t i o n t o a v o i d t h i s . The enormous c om pl ex it y o f t h e
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 15/343
s o c i a l o r g a n i z a t i o n , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e p r o g re s s o f s c i e n c e andt e c h n o lo g y , m eans t h a t t h e d e g r e e o f f re ed om p o s s i b l e f o r t h ehuman system i s a t p r e s e n t much g r e a t e r t h a n a t t h e b e g in n in g
o f t h e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y .
T he s o l u t i o n s now b e i n g p r o p o s ed b y t h e a dv an ce d c o u n t r i e sa r e c o n d i t i o n e d , a s i n ~ a l t h u s ' i m e s by t h e ne ed t o p u t them
i n t o a p a r t i c u l a r so cio -e co no mic a nd p o l i t i c a l c o n t e x t . Theyr es po nd t o t h e i n t e r e s t s of t h e d e ve lo pe d c o u n t r i e s an d, o n l ya s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e s e i n t e r e s t s , a r e th e y po sed a s u n iq u e an dp r e d e t er m i n e d . Even t h e i r h u m a n i s t i c v e r s i o n ( t h a t w hi chp o s t u l a t e s a r e t u r n t o na t u re , w i t h t h e r e j e c t i o n o f t h e
s o p h i s t ic a t e d and m as si ve t e ch n o lo g i es a s i n t r i n s i c a l l yh a r mf u l) e x p r e s s e s t h e vi ew p oi n t of c o u n t r i e s a nd c e r t a i n s o c i a l
s e c t o r s w i t h i n them w hich a r e now p e r c e i v i n g t h e n e g a t i v e e f f e c t so f o v e r - co n s um p t io n a n d t h e p o t e n t i a l d a n g er o f l a r g e m a s se so f u nd er de ve lo pe d c o u n t r i e s g a i n i n g a c c e s s t o l e v e l s of w e l f a r e .However , t h e dan ge r i s n o t i n t h e c o n t i n u a t i o n o f t e c h n o l o g i c a lp r o g re s s b u t r a t h e r i n i t s s o c i a l u s e .
The B a r i l o ch e Model s t a r t s f ro m t h e a s s um p ti o n t h a t a tl e a s t f o r t h e f o r e s ee a b le f u t u r e , t h e main o b s t ac l e s t o t h eh ar m on io u s d ev el op m en t o f m an kind a r e n o t p h y s i c a l ; r a t h e r t h e ya r e s o c i a l and p o l i t i c a l i n n a t u r e and depend on t h e p r e s e n td i s t r i b u t i o n o f p ower b o th a t an i n t e r n a t i o n a l and n a t i o n a ll e v e l . T h i s i s m a n i f e s te d i n t h e g ro wi ng i n e q u a l i t y w o rl dw id e
an d w i t h i n e a ch c o u n t r y , p a r t i c u l a r l y w i t h i n t h e u n de rd ev el op edc o u n t r i e s . T h i s i n no way i g no r e s t h e f a c t t h a t i f t h e c u r r e n t
t e n d e n c i e s o f m ankind c o n t i n u e, t h e d e t e r i o r a t i o n o f t h e p h y s i c a lenvi ronment might become a prob lem of g r e a t magni tude . t w i l l
p r o ba b l y n o t a p p e a r i n t h e f or m o f a n a b s o l u t e e x h a u s t i o n o fno n-renew able n a t u r a l r e s o u r c e s , o r o f a l e t h a l i n c r e a s e i np o l l u t i o n . However, t h e g e n e r a l d e t e r i o r a t i o n of t h e n a t u r a lhuman en v i ro n m en t g e n e r a t e d b y a c i v i l i z a t i o n , w h ic h h a s a so n e o f i t s m ain t a r g e t s t o i n c r e a s e t h e co ns um pt io n o f m a t e r i a lg ood s up t o i r r a t i o n a l l i m i t s may c r e a t e l i v i n g c o n d i t i o n sa lm o st a s c a t a s t r o p h i c a s t h e Ma lt hu si an s c a r c i t y .
e m ust a c c ep t t h e f a c t t h a t ma nk in d' s e f f e c t o n t h ep h y s i c a l e n vi ro n me n t d ep en ds b a s i c a l l y o n t h e s o c i a l o r g a n i za -t i o n a l s t r u c t u r e s a d o pt e d, an d on t h e a c c e p te d v a l u e s s ys te m .
Much of t h e v a lu e s o f t h e p r e s e n t wo rl d a r e i n t r i n s i c a l l yd e s t r u c t i v e t o t h e e co sys t e m , j u s t a s t h ey a r e d e s t r u c t i v e t oman himself who i s o ver wh elm ed by a n e v e r i n c r e a s i n g a l i e n a t i o n .
M ankind a nd t h e phy s i c a l e nv i r onm e n t ( w her e t i s i n s e r t e d )c o n s t i t u t e a s i n g l e s ys te m , w hich c a n o n l y b e d e s c r i b e d u s i n gs o ci o -e c on o m ic a n d p h y s i c a l v a r i a b l e s .
Th e u n d er d e ve l op e d c o u n t r i e s , w hi ch a r e t h e main v i c t i m s
o f t h e s ys te m, f i n d t h em s el ve s i n a h i s t o r i c a l s i t u a t i o n w hichco mp el s them t o f o r m u l at e s o l u t i o n s t h a t t a k e i n t o a cc ou n t t h ep o s s i b l e d e g r e e s o f f re ed om ; t i s t h e s e c o u n t r i e s whosei n t e r e s t s c o i n c i d e w i th t h e n eed f o r c ha ng in g a s o c i a l s t r u c t u r ew h ic h o b j e c t i v e l y h i n d e r s t h e d e v el o p me n t o f m a nk in d.
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 16/343
The following sections of the Report sketch a possibleworld in which there are new ways for human development. The
main objective is to initiate discussions which take into account
some of the most important factors involved in the global
problems faced by mankind.
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
The proposals contained in the Model to overcome the
obstacles to the development of mankind start from the following
main premises:
a) The catastrophies predicted by some current models
whether mathematical or not) constitute an everydayreality for a great part of mankind. Starvation,
illiteracy, premature death, lack of adequate housing
miserable living conditions are the common fate of
the major part of the inhabitants of the under-developed
countries. We should not wait 80 or 100 years until
an eventual exhaustion of the natural resources, or
pollution make the great centers of the developed
countries feel their effects. Thus the priority goal
should be to avoid these catastrophies. The less
advanced societies cannot progress by copying the
patterns of the developed countries because socio-
political conditions can not be duplicated and these
patterns are not desirable.
b) destructive value system has produced the detrimental
and irrational use of natural resources and the
deterioration of the environment, both characteristics
mainly derived from the growth of consumption of the
developed nations and of the privileged minorities
of the developing countries. Thus solutions to these
problems cannot be found by applying corrective measures,
but rather by creating a society intrinsically compatible
with its environment.
C) NO policy for the preservation of the ecosystem or for
the reduction of consumption of natural resources can
be effectively carried out at the world level untileach human being has reached an acceptable level of
life. This does not mean that no action is needed
until this level has been reached; it does mean that
policies might be successful only in the transitional
stage, and to the extent that they form an integral
part of those measures aimed at improving the cultural
and material conditions of the submerged masses of
mankind.
d) The privileged sectors of mankind -essentially those
of the developed countries- must reduce their rate of
economic growth in order to decrease their misuse of
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 17/343
n a t u r a l r e s o u r c e s a nd t h e en vi ro n me nt , and a l s o t o
c o u n t e ra c t t h e a l i e n a t i n g e f f e c t s of e x c es s i v econsumpt ion .
e ) The d ev el op ed c o u n t r i e s sh o ul d a l l o c a t e p a r t of t h ee co no mic s u r p l u s t o a i d T h i r d W orld c o u n t r i e s i no ve rc om in g t h e i r c u r r e n t s t a g n a t i o n ow in g i n p a r tt o p a s t a nd i n some c a s e s c u r r e n t , e x p l o i t a t i o n o ft h e s e c o u n t r i e s .
f ) The m ost r a t i o n a l method t o c o n t r o l t h e a c c e l e r a t e dg ro wt h of t h e p o p u l a t i o n i n t h e u n de rd e ve lo pe d c o u n t r i e si s t o i mprove t h e g e n e r a l l i v i n g c o n d i t i o n s .
The m od el h a s b ee n b u i l t a ro un d f o u r b a s i c a s s u m p ti o n s:
a ) The f i n a l g o a l p ur su e d i s a n e g a l i t a r i a n wo rld s o c i e t y ,b o th s o c i a l l y and i n t e r n a t i o n a l l y . The b a s i c p r i n c i p l ei s t h e acknowledgment t h a t each human be i ng , by t h emere f a c t of e x i s t e n c e ha s i n a l i e n a b le r i g h t s t o t h es a t i s f a c t i o n of a l l b a s i c n eeds- e . g . , f oo d , h e a l t h ,h o u s in g , e d u c a t i o n . T he se n e e ds a r e c o n s i d e r e d b a s i cb e ca u se w i t h o u t an a d eq u a te l e v e l of s a t i s f a c t i o n o fe ac h , a d i g n i f i e d a nd a c t i v e p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h ehuman r a c e b ecom es i m p o s s i b l e ; t h e y a r e a l s oc o n s id e r e d i n v a r i a n t , a s t h e y a p p l y t o e a c h human b e i n gi nd e pe n de nt of h i s b e lo n g in g t o a g iv e n c u l t u r e , h i so r i g i n , r a c e , s e x , and s o f o r t h .
b ) W hile t h e r e a r e many o t h e r a s p i r a t i o n s and ne e d s, t h e yd i f f e r q u a l i t a t i v e l y from t h e s e b a s i c n ee d s. TheModel does no t fo rm al i ze them, s i nc e th e mode o fs a t i s f a c t i o n of many of t h e s e v a r i e s w i t h ea ch s o c i e t y
a nd w i t h t i m e ; a l s o t h e Model d o e s n o t w i s h t o d e t e r m i n ethem.
C ) Each human be in g p a r t i c i p a t e s i n f u l l i n a l l s o c i a ld e c i s i o n s . T h i s i s a n e s s e n t i a l c o n d i t i o n t h a t p r e ve n tse q u a l i t y f ro m b ec om in g a m ere m a t e r i a l l e v e l i n g .
d ) The s o c i e t y i n t h e Model i s a n o n- con s um i st s o c i e t y ,t h a t i s a s o c i e t y i n w h ic h c on su m pt io n i s n o t a v a l u e
i n i t s e l f .
The l e v e l s o f s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e b a s i c ne ed s d e s c r ib e d i ne a c h of t h e v a r i o u s s e c t o r s of t h e Model s h o u l d n o t b e c o n s i d e r e dt h e d e s i d er a t u m f o r t h e f u t u r e of m ankind; t h e y r e p r e s e n t o n l ya re a s o n a b le g o a l , i n a c c or d w i t h p r e s e n t p o s s i b i l i t i e s . Once
t h e p r o po se d l e v e l s a r e a c h i e v ed , w ha t h ap pe ns t o t h e e c on om ics u r p l u s o r how t h e s u r p l u s w l l be used w l l d e p e n d o n t h ed e c i s i o n s t a k e n by a s o c i e t y a l r e a d y l i b e r a t e d f ro m b ac kw ar dn es sand m i s e ry . The Model d o e s n o t a t t e m p t t o p r e d i c t t h e s e
d e c i s i o n s , b u t t i s l i k e l y t h a t t h e y i nc l ud e su ch c u l t u r a lo p t i o n s a s i n c r e a si n g t h e l e i s u r e t i m e, r a t h e r t h a n an i n c r e as e
i n t h e c o ns um pt io n o f m a t e r i a l g oo ds .
8/21/2019 CP-76-008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/cp-76-008 18/343
In summary the Model assumes that the egalitarian
satisfactions of the basic needs and the participation of allindividuals in the social decisions are indispensableprerequisites for full access to all higher forms of humanactivity. It aims at a mobilizing goal; it does not attemptto formulate a complete theory which defines either system ofsocial organizations or a plan pre-established for thesepurposes. Such a claim would be illusory dangerous and probablyimpossible to substantiate. All historical progresssimultaneously solves problems and generates new ones; thusposing new possibilities and challenges.