CPCRN and the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP)

A proposed cross-center collaboration

Peggy Hannon & Matt Kreuter, co-chairs

May 10, 2010

About CRCCP

About CRCCP

• 80% screening by 2014

About CRCCP

• 80% screening by 2014

• Four broad strategies• population reach & impact• policy & systems change• awareness & outreach• leverage existing resources

About CRCCP

• 80% screening by 2014

• Using EBIs from the Guide• client reminders• small media• reducing structural barriers• provider assessment/feedback• provider reminders

About CRCCP

• 80% screening by 2014

• Using EBIs from the Guide• client reminders• small media• reducing structural barriers• provider assessment/feedback• provider reminders

• 26 states & tribal orgs

A unique opportunity for CPCRN

• Natural laboratory for dissemination

• Defined set of cancer control EBIs

• Large-scale practice settings

• Perfect timing

Our proposal

• Survey CRCCPs to assess D & I activity

• Identify precursors of D & I success

• Identify challenges to D & I

• Monitor progress over time

Criterion 1: Advancing D&I science

• Develop measures of implementation

• Describe translational steps used by CRCCP

• Identify infrastructure and support needed

• Informed by RE-AIM and ISF models

Criterion 2: Feasibility

• CPCRN history of projects similar in scope

• Developing, administering surveys & interviews

• Community partner surveys (CPCRN-II)

• Cancer conference attendees (CPCRN-II)

• HPV cognitive response testing (CPCRN-II)

• BCCCP evaluation (Emory SIP)

Criterion 3: Leadership

• Peggy Hannon (U. of Washington)

• Michelle Kegler (Emory)

• Matthew Kreuter (Washington University)

Criterion 4: Priority to funders

• DCPC priority at CDC

• Dr. Plescia directly requested CPCRN involvement

Criterion 5: Impact

• Provide great insight into how EBIs are adopted

and implemented in state and local PH systems

• Potential for impact with CRCCPs