CQC Thematic Activity
Emma Steel
Bernadette Hanney
2
What we will cover
1.Our regulatory model and the context for thematic activity
2.Thematic reviews
3.Themed inspection programmes
3
Legislation and standards
Single system of registration
Single set of standards
Strengthened and extended enforcement powers
Parliament Dept of Health
Care Quality Commission (Registration)
Regulations 2009
Health and Social Care Act 2008
(Regulated Activities)
Regulations 2010
CQC
4
CQC – what CQC does and does not do
What CQC does not do
We do not make assessments of commissioning – although we can comment on
shortcomings via themed reviews and investigations
We don’t assess quality above essential standards
We only promote improvement by focusing on non-
compliance
Inspectors are encouraged to describe what they see,
comment on good practice and reference it
CQC’s role
Register – inspect – enforce – publish
CQC registers care providers then checks whether they are meeting essential standards
If not, we take action – they must put problems right or face enforcement action
We publish what we find as quickly as possible
We share what we know with our partners
We put a premium on users/ whistleblowers
We monitor the care of those detained under the MHA
55
Forms of regulation
6
Scale of CQC regulated care
Primary medical services
9,000 locations
NHS Trusts
2800 locations
Independent healthcare
2,500 locations
Adult social care
24,000 locations
Independent ambulances
350 locations
Primary dental care
10,000 locations
Combined outpatients and inpatients
77.4 million
People using adult social care services
1.75 million
Dental appointments
36.4 million
7
Priorities in action
8
Inspection Analysis Voices
Our Regulatory Compilation
Themed inspections
Scheduled inspections
Responsive inspections
Investigations
Thematic reviews
Quality Risk Profiles
Surveillance
Other data sources
Website feedback
Telephone or written feedback
Third party feedback
Whistleblowing
Safeguarding
9
THEMATIC REVIEWS
THEMED INSPECTIONS
• Applicable to all inspectors
• Where information can provide assurance and increase efficacy
• Promotes consistency in follow up of concerns
• increase confidence in Operations'
interpretation of data • Can be precursor to a themed inspection, directing areas to examine
• A sub set of inspectors
• Where data is not available or cannot provide sufficient assurance
• Where supported and coordinated inspection is preferred methodology
•Random set of providers inspected
•Can test the risk model and provide feedback
• Service level
• Risk driven
• Proportionate
Thematic Reviews & Themed Inspections
10
Proposed topics so far
• Maternity: staffing and outcomes
• Physical health needs of people with a learning disability
• Pressure sores
• End of life care for people in care homes
• Deprivation of liberty safeguards
• Hospital discharge arrangements
• Medicines management
• Care of people with mental health needs in A&E
11
Suitability: a prescriptive commission to identify trusts at high risk of non-compliance within a specific topic area
Purpose: to maximise the use of existing data for risk based activity
Output: a hybrid of data analysis (RAG status at provider level) and expert prompts
Example: maternity: staffing and outcomes thematic review
Type 1 Thematic Review
12
Maternity review provider report
13
Maternity review provider report
Individual scores are presented here
Click on these questions to find out more about the results including
links to outcomes and national standards.
If data is presented graphically or there is important additional information,you can click here to reveal the graph
Click here to check the data
period and weight of the
data item
14
Regulatory response
Initiated responsive review 6
Bring forward planned review 3
Add further concerns to a responsive review already underway
3
Highlighted new concerns 13
Aware of risks and enforcement action already being taken 3
Positive local intelligence outweighed risks in the report 6
Total number of maternity providers = 144
15
Suitability: collating all available data to create a comprehensive picture; alternative presentation of existing data
Purpose: to present a picture which adds value through correlation or triangulation with other sources
Output: a complete, current data set as a baseline report with limited policy interpretation
Example: Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards thematic review
Type 2 Thematic Review
16
Deprivation of Liberty provider report
17
Deprivation of Liberty provider report
18
Principles ofinspection
New approach to inspections
Timely
At least once a year or once every two years depending on the provider
Focused
Inspections will focus on outcomes that are important
to people using services
Flexible
We can use different types of inspection to respond to concerns
Unannounced
We do not notify providers before we carry out inspections
1919
CQC Thematic Inspection Programme 2011/12
NHS Dignity & Nutrition Spring/Summer 2011
Learning Disability Services Autumn/Winter 2011
Phase 2 Dignity & Nutrition Winter/Spring 2012
2020
Why do a learning disability inspection programme?
Serious abuse identified in a service for people with learning disabilities:
• Winterbourne View 2011
History of abuse in learning disability services:
• Ely 1967• Cornwall 2005/06• Sutton and Merton 2006/07
2121
What does the inspection programme comprise of?
Care Quality Commission is undertaking inspections of 150 locations where assessment and treament and rehabilitation is provided.
A second phase will take the learning from phase one and look at alternative models of care.
2222
Inspection teams
Lead compliance inspector for this LD review
Compliance inspector portfolio holder
Experts by Experience:p
erson
who has used services
family carer
Professional advisor
23
Phase one
Aims
• To reassure people who use services, relatives, the public and CQC that the risk of such abuse occurring in any other unit is minimised.
• To take appropriate action if concerns arise
• To provide information for wider review of LD services.
Actions
Use existing methodology to inspect:
• Outcome 4 (regulation 9) Care and welfare of service users
• Outcome 7 (regulation 11) Safeguarding service users from abuse
• We will report on our findings on every location and produce a national report
2424
Background to the inspection programme
This review will directly support CQCs two strategic priorities:
• We focus on quality and act swiftly to eliminate poor quality care;
• We make sure care is centred on people’s needs and protects their rights
If we judge during this review that services are not meeting essential standards we will use our regulatory powers to ensure necessary improvements are made
If we judge during this review that people using a service are at risk, we take swift, proportionate action to protect people
2525
Questions
CQC – Helping make care better for people
Questions?