+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

Date post: 22-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: ady
View: 60 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections. Cathey Carter, PE RPG CREZ meeting 12/14/2007. Description . This solution starts with a transmission backbone between one central point and the three load centers. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
15
CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections Cathey Carter, PE RPG CREZ meeting 12/14/2007
Transcript
Page 1: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

CREZ Optimization Studies

Scenario 2, Alternative 4:Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

Cathey Carter, PERPG CREZ meeting 12/14/2007

Page 2: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

2

Description

• This solution starts with a transmission backbone between one central point and the three load centers.

• The central point is not connected to the existing network.

• The endpoints are Zenith near Houston, Trinity between Dallas and Fort Worth, and West Gate outside Austin – San Antonio.

• Each endpoint must be well developed to the local load-delivery network.

• Additional substations can be installed any where on the lines to attach new generation.

Page 3: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

3

Goals

1. Reduce impedance and phase angles between the three heaviest load areas.

2. Provide a strong “target” for new transmission lines from large new generation sources. Any big generator could build to the closest part of the backbone.

3. Reduce loading on existing major paths.

Page 4: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

4

Other Possible Effects, Good and Bad

1. Improve dynamic stability?2. Decrease loading on the biggest existing

transmission paths.3. Reduce nodal price differences among the load

centers?4. Possibly the maximum construction cost.5. Likely public opposition along ROW, which is

true for any new construction.6. Will require upgrades of existing network for n-1

security.

Page 5: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

5

Page 6: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

6

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

Zenith Sub Connections:• 50 mile 765kV line to Bryan rated 6625 MVA• (2) 2100 MVA autos to 345kV system• (2) 345kV lines to O’Brien, each rated 1450 MVA• (2) 345kV lines to Singleton, each rated 1450 MVA• (2) 345kV lines to TH Wharton, each rated 1499 MVA

Page 7: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

7

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

Bryan Sub Connections:• 50 mile 765kV line to Milam rated 6625 MVA• 50 mile 765kV line to Zenith rated 6625 MVA• (1) 2100 MVA 765-345kV auto, new 345kV bus• (1) 600 MVA 345-138kV auto, new 138kV bus• 10 miles 138kV line to BRYN_SWTCH rated 469 MVA• 10 mile 138kV line to BRYN_DSBY rated 469 MVA

Page 8: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

8

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

Milam Sub Connections:• 50 mile 765kV line to Bryan rated 6625 MVA• 70 mile 765kV line to Corsicana rated 6625 MVA• 35 mile 765kV line to Mid rated 6625 MVA

Page 9: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

9

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

Corsicana Sub Connections:• 70 mile 765kV line to Milam rated 6625 MVA• 75 mile 765kV line to Trinity rated 6625 MVA• (2) 2100 MVA autos to new 345kV bus at existing

crossing of two transmission corridors• (2) 345kV lines to Venus rated 1072 MVA• (2) 345kV lines to Watermill rated 1631 MVA• (2) 345kV lines to Big Brown rated 1072 MVA• (2) 345kV lines to Limestone rated 1631 MVA

Page 10: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

10

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

Trinity Sub Connections:• 75 mile 765kV line to Corsicana rated 6625 MVA• (2) 2100 MVA autos to new 345kV bus• (1) 345kV line to Benbrook rated 2988 MVA • (2) 345kV lines to Everman rated 2988 MVA• (2) 345kV lines to Liggett rated 2988 MVA• (1) 345kV line to Hicks rated 2988 MVA• (1) 345kV line to Saginaw rated 2988 MVA, plus (2) 800

MVA 345-138kV autos at Saginaw• (1) 600 MVA 345-138kV auto to existing Trinity 138kV

bus

Page 11: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

11

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

Mid Sub Connections:• 35 mile 765kV line to Milam rated 6625 MVA• 65 mile 765kV line to West Gate rated 6625 MVA• (2) 2100 MVA 765-345kV autos • (2) 345kV lines to Salado rated 1631 MVA• (1) 345kV line to Zorn rated 1630 MVA• (1) 345kV line to GILLE345 rated 1630 MVA• (1) 686 MVA 345-138kV auto

Page 12: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

12

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

West Gate Sub Connections:• 65 mile 765kV line to Mid rated 6625 MVA• (2) 2100 MVA 765-345kV autos • (1) 345kV line to Red Creek rated 3000 MVA• (1) 345kV line to Willow rated 1959 MVA• (1) 345kV line to Gillespie rated 1959 MVA, plus (2) 800

MVA 345-138kV autos, and a 345kV line to Kendall also rated 1959 MVA

• (1) 345kV line to Lampasas rated 1959, plus (2) 800 MVA 345-138kV autos

Page 13: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

13

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

Other New Lines in the Model:• 32 mile 345kV Hicks-Willow• 2nd Willow – Jacksboro 345kV line on same towers• 2nd Oklaunion – Bowman 345kV line on separate ROW• 2nd 345kV Twin Buttes – Red Creek line, separate ROW• 20 mile 345kV Bitter Creek – Bluff Creek line• 130 mile 345kV Bluff Creek – Lampasas line• 30 mile 345kV Goat – Red Creek line• 130 mile 345kV Red Creek – West Gate line

Page 14: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

14

Current Status of Study = Incomplete

Other Changes to the Model, not Lines:• 345kV ring bus at Paint Creek, not connected to

anything else• All 69kV and 138kV lines between Abilene and

Stephenville converted to short radials• Trinity 138kV buses connected.• (2) 345-138kV autos at IRV Valley Ranch• 138kV load and capbank moved from Hurst N to Hurst S• 69kV Seymour – Bomarton disconnected• 69kV Winters – Hatch disconnected• 345kV connection to Big Spring, and 138kV Midland

East – Big Spring rebuilt for 469 MVA

Page 15: CREZ Optimization Studies Scenario 2, Alternative 4: Low Impedance Backbone for Wind Connections

15

Comments

Please direct comments to Warren Lasher or Cathey Carter.

Warren: [email protected]

Cathey: [email protected]


Recommended