+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Date post: 11-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: austyn-burley
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
26
CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1
Transcript
Page 1: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

CRITICAL READINGRecognising the value of written material

1

Page 2: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Lecture Structure

Academic Reading Reading for Content Context/Purpose/Structure/Evidence/

Conclusion Logical Fallacies Language

Research Sources News Media/Theorists

Evaluating Sources Summary

2

Page 3: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

How is this different to reading for pleasure?

Academic Reading3

Page 4: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Academic Reading

Maximise comprehension.

How does this scholar relate to others I

have read?

How will this information be useful to my

understanding of the topic?

Critical thinking: Reading for content.

4

Page 5: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Reading for Content/Context

5

Who? What?

Why? Where?

When? & How?

Page 6: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Reading for Content/Context

6

Headings, bold, italicized, and

underlined text.

Introduction and conclusion

Skimming.

Scanning.

Page 7: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Context7

What is the genre? Who is the author? What is the author’s context? (time,

location, setting) What is the author’s purpose for writing

the text? How does the author position

themselves in the text? Who is the intended audience?

Page 8: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Purpose8

Why has the author written this? What does the author expect the reader to

learn? Who is the author’s audience? How does the author’s tone and positioning

reveal their purpose? Is the author’s tone authoritative or

conversational? How does the author refer to other scholars;

to prove or disprove their points?

Page 9: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Structure9

Identify the claim (thesis statement).

Logical progress from claim to evidence

to conclusion.

Page 10: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Evidence10

What evidence is used?

Contradicts/confirms previous evidence?

Valid examples?

Reliable sources?

Countering opposing evidence?

Page 11: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Conclusion11

Justified by evidence presented?

Convincingly linked to original claim?

Unevidenced claims?

Sufficient evidence?

Logical fallacies?

Page 12: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Logical Fallacies12

Created by Jesse Richardson, Andy Smith and Som Meaden Go to https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ for further fallacies and examples.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Page 13: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Language13

Tone predetermined. Hyperbole

“A giant leap forward for …the Goldman Sachs Project” (Foley, 2011)

Emotion. Colloquialisms

“This is the Goldman Sachs Project. Put simply, it is to hug governments close.” (Foley, 2011)

Foley, S. 2011. What price the new democracy? Goldman Sachs conquers Europe. The Independent. 18 November. Available: www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/what-price-the-new-democracy-goldman-sachs-conquers-europe-6264091.html [06 September 2013]

Neil Berry
These quotes are from a reading for the week. You may want to replace them with similar quotes from a reading for the specific course.
Page 14: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Exercise: Reading For Context14

What price the new democracy? Goldman Sachs conquers Europe. The Independent. Foley, S. 18 November 2011.

Available: www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/what-price-the-new-democracy-goldman-sachs-conquers-europe-6264091.html [06 September 2013]

Neil Berry
This is an illustration of the reading from which the quotes on the previous slide were taking. You may want to replace this with an image of a reading particular to your course.
Page 15: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

1. What is the text about ?2. Where was it published/genre ?3. What is the historical context ?4. Have there been any significant changes politically and

culturally since the article was written ?5. Who is the author?6. Why do you think the author is writing this particular

text ?7. What is the argument and why is the argument

significant ?8. What other positions/argument does the author

mention (or leave out) and how is this significant?9. Who is the audience ?10.What sources/evidence does the author rely on to

support his claims?

Exercise: Reading For Context15

Page 16: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Research Sources16

Page 17: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

1. What are the different sources of information you might expect to use in your research?

Exercise: Research Sources17

Page 18: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Research Sources

Books Political Encyclopaedias/Handbooks Single-author volume Multi-author (i.e. edited) volumes

Journal Articles Laws, Constitutions & other legal documents Academic Research Papers Government Publications & Manifestos Reports Media Presentations

18

Page 19: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

News Media19

BBC World Fox News Al Jazeera

Page 20: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Theorists

Kenneth Waltz

John Mearsheimer

Immanuel Wallerstein

Robert Keohane

Susan Strange

20

Neil Berry
These are theorist with particular relevance to some issues within the IPE discipline. You may want to replace these with theorists that are covered on your course.
Page 21: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Evaluating Sources21

Page 22: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Evaluating Sources

What is a reputable source in the social sciences? Expert

Peer-reviewed

If quantitative, methodology must be transparent and replicable.

22

Page 23: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Evaluating Sources: Citations

GoogleScholar for any type of source.

ISI Citation Database for journal articles.

23

Page 24: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Summary24

Page 25: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

Summary25

Critical reading is essential for

understanding.

Contextualise the text.

Interpret and assess the claim, evidence

and conclusions.

Page 26: CRITICAL READING Recognising the value of written material 1.

26

This presentation is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.5 South Africa License. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/za/ 

Or

send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA.


Recommended