CROP PR ODUCTION AGRONOMY, PHYSIOLO GY AN D …aiccip.cicr.org.in/CD_16_17/6_Crop_Production.pdf ·...

The follCotton.

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

Agrono

PH

PH

The trial

North Z

Centra

South Z

The proj

South zo

ICAR

owing pro

omy IA

omy 1B

omy II

omy III

omy IV

omy V

omy VI

omy VII

omy VIII

omy IX

omy X

HY1

1a

1b

HY2

ls were con

Zone F

l Zone SB

Zone LR

ject wise fi

ones are su

R ‐ All India

AGRON

ojects wer

Agronom/arboreu

Evaluatio

Developi

Weed M

Improvin

Technolo

Exploitin

Evaluatio

Evaluatio

Studies o

Paid up t

Screenin

Screenin

Screenin

Preparingdevelopm

nducted zo

Faridkot, B

Surat, AkolBhawanipa

Lam (GuntuRaichur, M

indings an

ummarized

a Coordina

C

NOMY, P

re underta

mic requireum genotyp

on of comp

ng suitable

anagemen

ng use effic

ogy for org

g the pote

on of hirsut

on of Desi c

on rooting

trial.

PHYSIOL

g of cotton

g genotype

g genotype

g for Climament and y

one‐wise a

athinda, S

a, Rahuri, atna and N

ur), Nandyudhol and

d salient h

d below.

D

ated Resea

CROP PR

PHYSIOLO

aken durin

AGRO

ments of ppes/ hybrid

pact cultur

e Agronom

nt in cotton

ciency of in

ganic cotto

ential of su

tum Bt ent

cotton ent

pattern of

LOGY AN

n genotype

es for wate

es for salin

ate Changeyield.

as follows:

irsa (Hisar

Nanded, InNagpur

yal, Dharwa Warangal

highlights o

D - 1

arch Projec

RODUCTI

OGY AN

ng Kharif 2

ONOMY

promising ds of cotto

e under HD

my for Bt hy

n.

nputs.

n Producti

b soiling in

tries under

tries under

f Bt / non B

ND BIOC

es for abio

er stress to

nity stress t

e: Effect of

), Sriganga

ndore, Kha

ad, Chamrl

of the resea

ct on Cotto

ION

D BIOCH

2016‐17 at

pre‐releason.

DPS with d

ybrids of t

ion.

n cotton cu

r HDPS.

r HDPS.

Bt and Des

CHEMIST

tic stress t

olerance.

tolerance.

f environm

anagar and

andwa, Ban

ajanagar, C

arch perta

on – Annu

HEMISTR

t various

e/ recently

different nu

he region.

ultivation.

i cotton.

TRY

tolerance.

ment on cro

d Kanpur

nswara, Ju

Coimbator

ining to No

al Report

RY

centres of

y released

utrient lev

op phenolo

unagarh

re, Srivillipu

orth, Centr

(2016 – 17

f AICRP o

hirsutum

vels.

ogy

uttur

ral and

7)

n

Agron

North G. hiSriganhighespacinSrigan Table

Trea

F2

Su

F2

CD (p

67.5

67.5

67.5

67.5

CD (p

75%

100

125

150

CD (p

AgronAICRP G. hirSriganHHH4signifibe op

IC

nomy IA

h Zone

irsutum vnganagar. r seed cong at Sriganganagar a

e 1: Agronolocation

tments

2296

uFlum

2228

p=0.05)

X30 cm

5X45cm

x 60 cm

x 75 cm

p=0.05)

% RDF

% RDF

5% RDF

0%RDF

p=0.05)

nomic requP on Cotto

rsutumhybnganagar 494.The spicantly higptimum at

CAR ‐ All In

A: Agronohirsutu

ariety, 22The spacitton yieldnganagar. and Hisar (T

omic requin of AICRP

F

SCY kg/ha

2487

1998

2582

244

2469

2241

180

2165

2419

2482

191

uirementsn in North

brid, CSHHthan othepacing 67.gher seed cBathinda a

ndia Coord

omic requm/arbore

296producng of 67.5 at FaridkAmong thTable 1).

rements oP on Cotton

aridkot

BN/ m2

122.9

103.2

113.7

7.6

118.9

107.6

5.5

109.6

112.5

117.7

NS

s of promish Zone

2012 proer hybrids5 x 75 cmcotton yieland Srigang

inated Res

uirementeum geno

ed signifi x30 cm wkot. Howehe fertilizer

of promisinn in North

BW (g)

Skg

hirsut

3.7 29

3.3 25

3.8

0.1 3

Sp

28

27

3.5

3.7

NS N

Fertilize

3.4

3.6 28

3.7 26

0.2 N

sing pre re

oduced sigs. Howevem out yielld at Hisarganagar (T

D - 2

search Pro

ts of prootypes/hy

cantly higwas found sver, signifr levels, 10

ng pre releZone

Srigang

SCY g/ha

Bpl

tum Varie

995 2

553 2

343 N

pacing (cm)

824 2

724 3

NS 2

er levels (k

862 2

686 2

NS N

eleased hi

gnificantly er, in Hislded at Bar. Among tTable 2).

oject on Co

omising pybrids of c

gher seedsuperior atficant diffe00% RDF se

eased hirsu

ganagar

BN/ lant

B(g

ties

28.5 3

27.3 3

NS N

)

24.6 3

31.2 3

2.9 N

kg/ha)

27.8 3

28.1 3

NS N

irsutum hy

higher sear the hiathinda, wthe fertilize

otton – An

pre‐releacotton.

d cotton t Hisar anderences weemed to b

utum varie

W g)

SCYkg/h

.2 2222

.3 2860

NS 244.9

.3 2718

.2 2363

NS 211.2

.3 2438

.3 2548

2637

NS NS

ybrids und

eed cottonighest yiewhereas 6er levels, 1

nual Repo

se/recent

yield at d 67.5 x 60were not obe optimum

etiesunder

His

Y a

BN/ m

2 134.

0 171.

9 22.3

8 197.

3 107.

2 18.4

8 143.

8 154.

7 160.

NS

er differen

n yield at ld was re7.5 x 45 100% RDF

ort (2016 –

tly releas

Faridkot 0 cm recorobserved wm at Farid

r different

ar

m2 BW

.0 3.

.0 3.

3 N

.5 3.

.7 3.

4 N

.0 3.

.7 3.

.2 3.

S N

nt location

Bathinda ecorded wcm produwas found

17)

sed

and ded with kot,

W (g)

.6

.6

S

.5

.7

S

.6

.6

.6

S

n of

and with ced d to

Table 2:

Treatm

HHH 4

CSHH 2

CD (p=0

67.5x45

67.5 x 6

67.5 x 7

67.5 x 9

CD (p=0

75% R

100 %

125% R

150%R

CD (p=0

Effect of At Hisar

the high

67.5 X 1

% RDF w

optimum

ICAR

: Agronomlocation

ents Skg

494 24

2012 28

0.05) 2

5 cm

0 cm 26

5 cm 27

0 cm 24

0.05) 1

RDF 22

RDF 28

RDF 28

RDF

0.05) 1

f compact

r, compact

hest seed c

15 cm were

was found

m is neede

R ‐ All India

mic requiremof AICRP o

Bath

CY /ha

BN

468 70

817 85

61 6

699 79

798 8

430 7

87 N

258 66

819 8

851 84

6

39 3

culture un

culture, H

cotton yield

e produced

optimum

ed (Table 3

a Coordina

ments of pon Cotton

inda

/ m2 BW(g

0.2 3.

5.2 3.

6.3 N

9.1 3.

1.1 3.

73 3.

NS 0.

6.6 3.

1.7 3.

4.9 3.

6.6

3.6 0.

nder HDPS

H1465 obse

d was reco

d high yiel

at Hisar b

).

D

ated Resea

promising in North Z

W g)

SCYkg/h

hirsutu

.7 2218

.8 2919

NS 231

Spac

2625

.5 2511

.9

.9

.2 NS

Fertilizer l

.6

.8 2564

.9 2572

.2 NS

S with diffe

erved with

orded with

d at Hisar

but the res

D - 3

arch Projec

pre releasZone

Srigangan

Y a

BN/plan

um Hybrids

8 32.8

9 35.3

NS

ing (cm)

5 34.1

1 34.0

NS

evels (kg/

4 32.9

2 35.2

NS

erent nutr

h superior

RS2718. A

and Srigan

sults of Srig

ct on Cotto

sed hirsutu

nagar

/ nt

BW(g)

s

8 3.2

3 3.1

NS

1 3.2

0 3.1

NS

/ha)

9 3.1

2 3.2

NS

ient level

performan

Amongst sp

nganagar r

ganganaga

on – Annu

um hybrids

SCY kg/ha

2167

1785

115

2107

1845

252

1812

2072

2043

NS

in North zo

nce; Howe

pacing test

respective

ar reported

al Report

s under dif

Hisar

BN/ m2

113.0

95.3

10.5

126.8

81.5

7.8

98.8

106.6

107.1

NS

one

ever, in Srig

ted, 67.5 X

ly. Applica

d that 25 %

(2016 – 17

fferent

BW (g

3.2

3.1

NS

3.5

3.4

NS

3.4

3.4

3.5

NS

ganganaga

X 20 cm an

ation of 10

% more fo

7)

g)

ar

d

0

or

Table

Tre

V1

V2

C

S1‐6

S2‐6

S3‐6

C

F1‐1

F2‐1

F3‐1

C

Centr Agronof AIC The hNandeNandeNande(Table

IC

e 3: Effect o

eatments

1‐RS 2718

2‐H1465

CD at 5%

67.5X15 cm

67.5X20 cm

67.5X30 cm

CD at 5%

100% RDF

125% RDF

150% RDF

CD at 5%

ral Zone

nomic requCRP on Cot

hirsutum vaed than oed produced and 12e 4).

CAR ‐ All In

of compac

SCY

28

36

33

m 33

m 33

m 29

2

31

31

33

3

uirementstton in Cen

ariety, BGther varieced signific25% at Bh

ndia Coord

ct culture u

kg/ha

814

681

37.5

365

388

990

57

196

196

352

63

s of promisntral Zone

DS 1063gaeties. The scantly highawanipatn

inated Res

under HDP

Hisar

BN/M2

V

120.3

144.0

2.7

Sp

141.0

151.0

104.0

4.8

Fertilize

119.0

131.0

147.0

4.8

sing pre re

ave significspacing ofher seed cona were th

D - 4

search Pro

PS with diff

BW (g)

Varieties

3.1

3.3

NS

pacing (cm)

3.2

3.2

3.3

NS

er levels (k

3.2

3.2

3.3

NS

eleased Hi

cantly highf 90 x 30 otton yieldhe optimu

oject on Co

ferent nut

SCY k

31

23

1

)

29

26

1

kg/ha)

25

28

29

2

irsutum Va

her seed ccm at Bhad. Among tum doses

otton – An

trient level

Srig

kg/ha

183

364

73

926

620

73

583

829

907

59

arieties un

cotton yielawanipatnthe nutrieof fertilize

nual Repo

l in North

ganganaga

BN/PL

25.4

30.2

2.3

29.0

26.7

NS

26.8

29.3

27.3

NS

nder differ

d at Bhawa and 60 nts levels,er forhirsu

ort (2016 –

Zone

r

BW (

3.2

3.2

NS

3.3

3.1

0.2

3.2

3.3

3.0

NS

rent locati

wanipatna X 22.5 cm 100% RDutum varie

17)

(g)

2

2

S

3

1

2

2

3

0

S

ons

and m at F at eties

Table 4:

Treat

V1‐ C

V2 – BG

CD

S1.60X

S2.60

S3.60

S4.90

S5.90

S6.90

CD

F1‐75

F2‐ 10

F3‐125

CD

The high

Howeve

observe

spacing

Rahuri a

and 125

ICAR

: Agronomlocation

tments

CH 12‐3

GDS 1063

at 5%

X22.5 cm

x 30 cm

x 45 cm

x30 cm

x 45 cm

x 60 cm

at 5%

5 % RDF

00% RDF

5 % RDF

at 5%

hest seed c

er, all four

d with eq

levels in a

and 120 X 4

% RDF at J

R ‐ All India

mic requirn of AICRP

SCY kg

296

325

357

321

310

300

162.9

286

303

342

416

cotton yiel

r varieties

qual perfo

all testing

45 cm for S

Junagarh a

a Coordina

rements ofon Cotton

Bhawa

g/ha B

65

51

7

15

09

00

97

68

36

20

6

ld was obt

(V1‐ TCH‐

rmance at

centers. H

Surat is rec

and Surat w

D

ated Resea

f promisinn in Centra

anipatna

BN/ m2

hirsutum

78

83.6

6.3

Spac

116.5

70.8

55.0

5.9

Fertilizer l

75.1

79

88.3

4.6

ained from

‐1777, V2‐

t Surat. Se

Hence spa

commende

were found

D - 5

arch Projec

ng pre releal Zone.

BW (g)

m Varietie

4.4

4.8

0.6

ing (cm)

4.7

4.6

4.5

0.4

evels (kg/

4.5

4.6

4.8

0.3

m hirsutum

BGDS‐106

eed cotton

acing of 12

ed. Among

d optimum

ct on Cotto

eased hirsu

SCY k

s

99

12

6

12

11

99

11

/ha)

99

11

12

11

m variety,TC

63, V3‐CCH

n yield wa

20 X 30cm

g the nutri

m (Table 5).

on – Annu

utum varie

Na

kg/ha

99

22

6

14

20

97

18

98

28

06

18

CH‐1777at

H‐12‐2 and

as not inf

m for Junag

ents levels

.

al Report

eties unde

anded

BN/ m2

51.0

60

3.06

62.2

56.6

44.8

52.1

56.3

58.2

5.8

tJunagarh a

d V4‐GIHV

fluenced b

garh, 90 x

s, 100% RD

(2016 – 17

er differen

BW (g)

2.1

2.3

0.2

2.1

2.2

2.4

0.2

2.1

2.2

2.3

0.2

and Rahur

‐516) wer

by differen

x 30 cm fo

DF at Rahu

7)

nt

ri;

re

nt

or

ri

Table

Tre

V1‐ T

V2‐ B

V3‐C

V4‐G

V5‐ R

C.D

S1‐9

S2‐9

S3‐9

S4‐1

S5‐12

C.D

F1‐

F2‐ 1

F3‐ 1

C.D

AgronAICRP HirsutAkolasignififound

IC

e5: Agronolocati

eatments

TCH‐1777

BGDS‐1063

CCH‐12‐2

GIHV‐516

RHC‐0717

D. @ 5%

90x30 cm

90x60 cm

90x90 cm

20x30 cm

20 x 45cm

D. @ 5%

75% RDF

100% RDF

125% RDF

D. @ 5%

nomic requP on Cotto

tum hybrid and Nanicantly higd optimum

CAR ‐ All In

omic requion of AICR

SCY kg/ha

1202

946

979

91

1058

1027

NS

958

999

1169

91

uirementsn in Centr

d, GSHH‐2ded than gher seed c for both t

ndia Coord

uirements RP on Cott

Junagarh

BN/ m2

75.8

71.0

64.0

4.2

73.7

66.8

3.4

66.5

69.7

74.6

4.2

of promisal Zone.

2595 gave other precotton yiethe locatio

inated Res

of promiston in Cent

2 BW(g)

hirsut

3.8

3.9

4.1

NS

Sp

4.0

3.9

NS

Fertilize

3.8

4.0

4.1

NS

sing pre re

significante releasedld in bothns of Akola

D - 6

search Pro

sing pre retral Zone.

Ra

SCY kg/ha

B

tum variet

1791

1544

1449

1991

80

pacing (cm)

1762

1709

1610

NS

er levels (k

1589

1712

1779

112

eleased hir

tly higher hirsutum the locatia and Nand

oject on Co

eleased hi

ahuri

BN/ m2 B

ties

47.7

43.1

42.2

52.3

4.6 N

)

57.2

45.5

36.3

NS

kg/ha)

43.7

46.9

48.3

N.S. N

rsutum hyb

seed cott hybrids. ions. Amoded (Table

otton – An

irsutum va

BW (g)

SCkg/

4.2 142

4.1 142

141

3.8 138

4.4

N.S. NS

3.9

4.0

4.5

137

144

NS NS

4.1 126

4.1 138

4.2 158

N.S. 65

brids unde

on yield inThe spacing the fere 6).

nual Repo

arieties un

Sur

CY /ha

BN/

20 46.

28 47.

10 45.

84 50.

S 2.4

74 48.

47 46.

S 2.6

66 44.

80 46.

86 51.

5 NS

er differen

n both theng of 90 rtilizer leve

ort (2016 –

nder differ

rat

m2 BW

.2 4.

.7 4.

.4 4.

.4 3.

4 0.

.8 4.

.1 4.

6 N

.5 3.

.6 4.

.3 4.

S N

nt location

e locationsx 45cm gels, 125% w

17)

rent

(g)

.1

.0

.2

.6

.2

.0

.0

S

.9

.0

.1

S

s of

s of gave was

Table 6

Tre

V1 : G

V2 :

CD

S1 –

S2 –

S3 –

CD

F1‐ 7

F2‐ 10

F3‐ 12

F4‐ 15

CD

At Junagother getested whigher sSurat. (T

ICAR

: Agronomlocation

atments

GSHH‐2595

NHH‐715

D at 5%

– 90 x 60

– 90 x 45

90x90 cm

D at 5%

5 % (RDF

00 % (RDF)

25 % (RDF)

50 % (RDF)

D at 5%

garh and Renotype RHwere foundseed cottoTable 7).

R ‐ All India


SCY

5 2

1

1

2

)

) 1

) 2

) 2

Rahuri, hirHHH‐1015 d non‐signn yield. Ap

a Coordina

rements oon Cotton

Y kg/ha

2046

1933

151

1875

2104

76

1886

2019

2064

86

rsutum hywas obse

nificant at Jpplication

D

ated Resea

of promisinn in Centra

Akola

BN/ m2

hirsutu

72

67

4.5

Spac

65

73

2.3

Fertilizer l

66

70

72

2.1

brid RHH‐rved with Junagarh aof 100 %

D - 7

arch Projec

ng pre relal Zone.

BW (g

um Hybrids

3.7

4.2

0.3

ing (cm)

4

3.8

0.2

evels (kg/

3.8

3.9

4.0

0.2

1007 recohigher yieand Surat. RDF was f

ct on Cotto

eased hirs

g) SCY

s

14

1

6

1

14

1

8

/ha)

1

1

14

8

orded high eld than otSpacing ofound opti

on – Annu

sutum hyb

N

kg/ha

453

147

66.0

346

415

139

85.0

163

311

425

85.0

seed cotther genotyof 90 X 60 imum for J

al Report

brids unde

Nanded

BN/ m2

51

46.5

2.9

50.7

56.9

38.6

3.9

46.3

48.8

51.1

3.9

ton yield bypes. All thcm at RahJunagarh,

(2016 – 17

er differen

BW (g)

2.8

2.5

0.1

2.7

2.6

2.7

NS

2.6

2.7

2.8

0.1

but in Surahe spacinghuri yieldeRahuri an

7)

nt

)

at gs d d

Table

Tre

V1= R

V2= R

V3‐ R

CD

S1‐ 9

S2‐ 9

S3‐90

S4‐12

S5‐12

C.D

F1 ‐

F2 ‐ 1

F3 ‐ 1

CD

Agronof AIC BarbaJunagspacinrespo75% R

IC

e 7: Agronlocati

atments

RHH‐1007

RHH‐1015

RHH‐0622

D at 5 %

90 × 60 cm

90× 90 cm

0 × 120 cm

20 x 30 cm

20 x 45 cm

D. at 5 %

75% RDF

100 % RDF

125 % RDF

D at 5 %

nomic requCRP on Cot

adense vagarh.Plantinng levels donse with fRDF was re

CAR ‐ All In

nomic reqion of AICR

SCY kg/ha

3245

3583

198.8

3477

3351

NS

3233

3421

3589

243.4

uirementstton in Cen

riety, GSBng at 120 did not inffertilizers lecommend

ndia Coord

uirementsRP on Cott

Junagarh

BN/ m2

82.0

83.0

NS

82.0

83.0

NS

81.0

82.0

85.0

NS

s of promisntral Zone

B 43 was X 45 cm fluence siglevels at bded for GSB

inated Res

s of promiton in Cent

BW (g)

hirsu

23.7

23.6

NS

Sp

24

23.4

NS

Fertilize

22.7

23.6

24.7

NS

sing pre‐re.

tested foproduced

gnificantly both the teB 43 at Sur

D - 8

search Pro

ising pre rtral Zone.

R

SCY kg/ha

B

utum Hybr

2630

2334

2219

123

pacing (cm)

2471

2413

2298

167

er levels (k

2271

2416

2495

164

eleased ba

r spacing d significanat Junagarested placerat and Jun

oject on Co

released h

Rahuri

BN/ m2

ids

53.5

49.2

49.4

NS

)

55.7

51.0

45.4

8.6

kg/ha)

48.3

51.4

52.4

NS

arbadense

and nutrntly higherrh. The gees; which nagarh.

otton – An

hirsutum h

BW(g)

SCkg/

4.2 227

4.1 253

3.8

NS 19

3.7

4.1

4.4

253

227

0.6 N

4.0 228

4.0 238

4.1 254

0.1 N

e variety u

rient requr seed cotenotype faconcluded

nual Repo

hybrids un

Sur

CY /ha

BN/

78 59

31 66

99 5.5

35 68

74 57

S NS

80 61

86 62

48 65

S NS

under diffe

irements tton yield iled to shod that mini

ort (2016 –

nder differ

rat

m2 BW

.7 4.

.5 4.

5 N

.3 3.

.8 4.

S 0.

.8 3.

.4 4.

.0 4.

S 0.

erent locat

at Surat at Surat bow significimum leve

17)

rent

W (g)

.0

.0

S

.9

.1

.1

.9

.0

.1

.2

tion

and but, cant el of

Table 8

Treat

S1: 120

S2: 120

CD @

F1‐ 75

F2‐ 10

F3‐ 12

CD @

Agronom

Cotton i

Inter spe

Junagarh

seed co

produce

on nutr

Junagarh

places.

ICAR

8: AgronomCentral

tments

0 x 45 cm

0 x 30 cm

@ 5%

5% RDF

00% RDF

5% RDF

@ 5%

mic requir

in Central

ecific hybr

h (Table 9

otton yield

ed significa

rient respo

h. The tria

R ‐ All India

mic requirzone

SCY kg

184

157

135

166

172

174

NS

ement of P

Zone.

rid (H X B),

).The geno

d was reco

antly highe

onse foun

al conclude

a Coordina

rements o

S

g/ha B

43

78

5

61

28

42

S

Promising

, RHB‐1014

otype perf

orded with

er seed cot

d that 12

ed that 10

D

ated Resea

of promis

urat

BN/ m2

Spac

35.5

35.2

NS

Fertilizer l

31.3

34.0

36.3

3.7

pre‐releas

4 was test

ormed bet

h 90 X 60

tton yield

5 % RDF

00 % RDF

D - 9

arch Projec

ing pre‐re

BW (g)

ing (cm)

3.7

3.4

0.1

evels (kg/

3.4

3.6

3.7

0.1

se HxB hyb

ed for agro

tter than l

0 cm at Ra

for the bo

recorded

is recomm

ct on Cotto

eleased ba

SCY k

64

65

N

/ha)

59

61

72

N

brids at dif

onomic re

ocal contr

ahuri. Plan

oth locatio

significant

mended fo

on – Annu

arbadense

Jun

kg/ha

43

50

NS

99

11

29

NS

fferent loc

quirement

rol (RHB‐07

nting of 1

ns of Sura

tly higher

or RHB‐101

al Report

e variety(G

nagarh

BN/PL

88

86

NS

86

87

89

NS

cations of A

t at Rahuri

711)at Rah

120 X 45 c

t and Juna

yield at

14 in all th

(2016 – 17

GSB 43) i

BW (g)

15

15

NS

14

15

15

NS

AICRP on

i, Surat an

huri. Highe

cm spacin

agarh. Trial

Rahuri an

hree teste

7)

n

d

er

g

ls

d

d

Table

Tre

V1‐

V2‐

CD

S1‐ 9

S2‐ 9

S3‐9

S4.12

S5.1

CD

F1 ‐

F2 ‐

F3‐ 1

CD

AgronAICRP

Agron

10) Th

was n

regist

and fo

IC

e 9: AgronoAICRP

eatments

RHB‐1014

RHB‐0711

D at 5%

90 × 60 cm

90× 90 cm

0 × 120cm

20 X30 cm

120X45 cm

D at 5%

75% RDF

100% RDF

125% RDF

D at 5%

nomic reqP on Cotto

nomic requ

he genotyp

noticed at

tered highe

ound that

CAR ‐ All In

omic requon Cotton

SCY kg/ha

4 2111

1702

207

m 2315

m 1885

m 1519

m

117

1765

1936

2072

136

quirementsn in Centr

uirement o

pe perform

different s

er yield th

125 and 10

ndia Coord

uirement on in Centra

Rahuri

BN/ m2

41.5

34.5

4.4

47.1

37.5

29.5

6.5

35.3

38.6

40.2

2.6

s of promal Zone.

of Desi hyb

med better

spacing lev

an others.

00 % RDF w

inated Res

of Promisial Zone.

2 BW (g)

Hx

4.3

4.2

N.S.

Sp

4.1

4.2

4.4

N.S.

Fertilize

4.2

4.2

4.3

N.S.

mising pre

brid, NACH

r than loca

vels. Planti

The Desi

were optim

D - 10

search Pro

ng pre‐rel

S

SCY kg/ha

B

xB hybrids

1711

pacing (cm)

1578

1843

135

er levels (k

1661

1728

1742

NS

released

H‐433 was

al control (

ing of 60 x

hybrid, NA

mum with A

oject on Co

ease HxB

Surat

BN/ m2

s

55.3

)

56.0

54.6

NS

kg/ha)

53.4

55.7

56.8

NS

Desi hyb

experime

(PKV Suvar

x 45 cm at

ACH‐433 sh

Akola and

otton – An

hybrids a

BW(g)

SCkg/

3.6 286

3.4 285

3.7 287

0.1 NS

3.4 257

3.6 289

3.7 311

0.1 366

rids unde

nted at Ak

rna) at Ako

Akola and

howed pos

Nanded re

nual Repo

t different

Juna

CY /ha

BN/

64 51

56 61

71 40

S 1.

78 50

98 51

15 51

6.6 NS

r differen

kola and N

ola. Signific

d 90 x 45 c

sitive nutr

espectively

ort (2016 –

t locations

garh

m2 BW

.1 3.

.3 3.

.8 4.

1 N

.6 3.

.2 3.

.3 4.

S N

nt location

Nanded (Ta

cant respo

cm at Nan

rient respo

y.

17)

s of

W (g)

.9

.8

.0

S

.7

.9

.1

S

n of

able

onse

ded

onse

Table 1

Tre

V1 : N

V2 : PK

CD

S1 : 6

S2 : 6

S3.9

S4.9

S5.9

CD

F1‐7

F2‐1

F3‐1

F4‐1

CD

Effect of

High den

nutrient

between

the both

The resu

ICAR

10:Agronomlocatio

eatments

NACH‐433

KV Suvarna

D at 5%

60 x 30 cm

60 x 45 cm

90X45 cm

90X60cm

90X90cm

D at 5%

75 % RDF

00 % RDF

25 % RDF

50 % RDF

D at 5%

f compact

nsity plant

t response

n rows and

h locations

ults conclu

R ‐ All India

mic requin of AICRP

SCY

2

a 2

2

2

2

2

2

culture un

ting of com

e in centra

d 10 cm b

s of Rahuri

ded that 1

a Coordina

irements P on Cotto

Y kg/ha

2826

2654

189

2516

2963

168

2535

2793

2891

147

nder HDPS

mpact cultu

l zone at

between p

and Surat

100 and 12

D

ated Resea

of promisn in Centr

Akola

BN/ m2

Desi

94

109

3.3

Spac

105

98

4.9

Fertilizer l

94

103

108

4.7

S with diffe

ure, ARBC

Rahuri and

lants was

t. Nutrient

25 % of RDF

D - 11

arch Projec

sing pre al Zone.

BW (g

hybrids

3.4

2.6

0.2

ing (cm)

2.9

3.1

0.1

evels (kg/

3.0

3.0

3.0

NS

erent nutr

1301 was e

d Surat(Ta

recorded

response

F was optim

ct on Cotto

released

g) SCY

1

1

1

1

/ha)

1

1

1

1

ient level

experimen

able 11). H

significant

was signifi

mum respe

on – Annu

Desi hybr

N

kg/ha

431

564

474

256

81

326

439

529

140

in Central

nted to find

High densi

tly higher

icant at Su

ectively at

al Report

rids unde

Nanded

BN/ m2

34.8

68.1

61.3

48.6

6.2

53.2

59.9

64.9

5.7

Zone

d out the s

ity plantin

seed cotto

urat but no

Rahuri an

(2016 – 17

r differen

BW (g)

2.5

2.4

2.5

2.6

NS

2.4

2.5

2.5

NS

spacing an

g of 60 cm

on yield fo

ot at Rahur

d Surat

7)

nt

)

d

m

or

ri.

Table

Tr

S1‐

S2‐

S3‐

C

F1 ‐

F2 ‐

F3‐

C

The c

Akola

of RD

conclu

(Table

Table

Tr

S1 :

S2 :

S3 :

F1‐

F2‐

F3‐

IC

e 11: EffecCent

reatments

60 x 10 cm

75 x 10 cm

90 x 10 cm

CD at 5%

‐100 % RD

‐125 % RD

150 % RD

CD at 5%

compact cu

and Nand

DF, which w

uded that

e 12).

e 12: EffecCent

reatments

: 45 x 10 cm

60 x 10 c

75 x 10 c

CD at 5%

‐100 % RD

‐125 % RD

‐150 % RD

CD at 5%

CAR ‐ All In

ct of comptral Zone

SC

m

m

m

F

F

F

ulture DSC

ded. The sig

was on pa

125 % RDF

ct of comtral Zone

s SC

m

m

m

F

F

F

ndia Coord

pact cultu

CY kg/ha

2264

1907

1673

414.9

1851

1965

2029

NS

C‐1352 rec

gnificant n

r with 125

F is optimu

mpact cultu

CY kg/ha

2437

2226

2097

205

2061

2301

2398

180

inated Res

re (ARBC

Rahuri

BN/ m

Sp

347.5

253.5

269.5

40.47

Fertilize

276.1

290.9

303.5

55.5

corded hig

nutrient res

5 % RDF fo

um for the

ure (DSC‐1

Akola

BN/ m

Sp

101

87

82

11.3

Fertilize

87

91

93

NS

D - 12

search Pro

1301) un

2 BW

pacing (cm)

5.0

5.3

5.6

NS

er levels (k

4.8

5.4

5.6

NS

gh yield un

sponse wa

or the bot

genotype

1352) und

m2 BW

pacing (cm)

3.1

3.2

3.2

NS

er levels (k

3.1

3.2

3.2

NS

oject on Co

der HDPS

(g) SC

)

0

3

6

S

kg/ha)

8

4

6

S

nder HDPS

as recorded

th location

for the bo

der HDPS

(g) SC

)

1

2

2

S

kg/ha)

1

2

2

S

otton – An

with diff

CY kg/ha

2336

2154

1908

196

2022

2103

2273

196

S planting

d for seed

ns of Akola

oth locatio

with diffe

CY kg/ha

1547

1487

1374

91.9

1343

1480

1583

161.2

nual Repo

ferent nut

Surat

BN/PL

7.8

8.4

8.7

0.7

7.8

8.2

8.8

0.7

of 45 x 1

cotton yie

a and Nan

ns of Akola

erent nutr

Nanded

BN/ m

84

75.1

63.3

1.9

67.3

73.4

81.7

11.3

ort (2016 –

rient leve

L BW (

3.4

3.4

3.4

NS

3.4

3.3

3.5

0.1

0 cm both

ld up to 15

ded. The t

a and Nan

rient leve

2 BW (

2.0

2.2

2.2

0.1

2.0

2.1

2.2

NS

17)

el in

(g)

4

4

4

S

4

3

5

1

h at

50%

trial

ded

l in

(g)

0

2

2

1

0

1

2

S

South Zo AgronomAICRP co

Hirsutum

of south

optimum

higher s

and Nan

(Table 1

Table13

Trea

G1:

G2: A

G3‐ S

CD

S1:60

S2: 75

S375

S4: 90

S590

CD

F1.10

F2.12

F3.15

CD

Hirsutumcomparerespectinutrient

ICAR

one

mic requirotton in so

m variety,

h zone incl

m for both

seed cotto

ndyal, but

3).

3: Agronolocatio

atments

: IH‐11

RBH‐813

Sri Rama

( 0.05)

0 x 30 cm

5 x 30 cm

X 45 cm

0 x 30 cm

0X 45 cm

( 0.05)

00 % RDF

25% RDF

50%RDF

( 0.05)

m variety, Ted to othevely produt levels and

R ‐ All India

rements ofouthern Zo

IH‐11 resp

udes Dhar

locations

n yield at

incompara


Dh

SCY kg/ha

B

1542

2072

233

1729

2044

1649

189

1687

1801

1933

99

TSH‐04/11er genotypuced highed found tha

a Coordina

f promisinone

ponded sig

wad, Cham

Dharwad

Nandyal.

able signifi

rements oP on Cotto

harwad

BN/ m2 B

68

88

12

66

87

81

10

70 4

79 4

86 4

7

15 out perfpes (HS 29er yield at Cat 125 % R

D

ated Resea

ng pre‐rele

gnificantly

mrajnagar

and Cham

Applicatio

icant respo

of promisinn in South

BW (g)

SCYkg/h

hirsutum

4.2 102

4.6

NS

Spac

4.4

4.4 114

903

4.4 101

NS 175

Fertilizer l

4.35 875

4.42 102

4.46 116

NS 143

formed in 92 and CCCoimbatorRDF was op

D - 13

arch Projec

ease hirsut

with spaci

and Nandy

rajanagar.

on of 125%

onse was o

ng pre relh Zone.

Chamraj

Y ha

BN/ p

m varietie

20 24.

ing (cm)

41 19.

3 28.

15 25.

5

evels (kg/

5 20.

22 23.

61 28.

3 1.7

both the teCH 13‐2). re and LAMptimum of

ct on Cotto

tum variet

ng and nu

yal. The sp

Planting o

% of RDF w

observed u

eased hirs

nagar

plantBW(g)

es

.4 4.2

.1 3.9

.7 4.4

.4 4.2

/ha)

.6 4.1

.7 4.17

.9 4.29

78 0.08

esting locaPlanting oM. Significafor both c

on – Annu

ties under

utrient leve

pacing of 7

f 90 x 45cm

was optimu

up to 150 %

sutumvarie

W )

SCY kg/ha

2 2298

2095

183

2026

9

4

2

2367

130

1 2080

7 2230

9 2280

8 148

ations (Coimof 60 X 30ant responsenters (Ta

al Report

different

els in teste

75 x 30 cm

m gave s

um at Cha

% of RDF a

eties unde

Nandyal

BN/ m2

55.9

51.8

4

51.5

56.4

4.3

52.6

53.5

55.6

2.3

mbatore a0 cm and se was obsble 14).

(2016 – 17

location o

ed location

m was foun

significantl

mrajanaga

at Dharwa

er differen

l

BW (g)

4.2

4.1

NS

4.04

4.3

NS

4.26

4.21

3.98

NS

nd LAM) a90 X45 cmserved wit

7)

of

ns

d

y

ar

d

nt

as m h

Table

T

V1‐

V

V3

V

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

F1

F2

F3

Agron

Hirsut

Nandy

Cham

cm re

nutrie

incom

IC

e14: Agronlocat

Treatments

‐ TSH 04/1

V2‐ HS 292

3‐ CCH 13‐

V4 ‐MCU 12

CD@5%

1.60×30 cm

2.75×30 cm

3.90×30 cm

4.90 X 45cm

‐105X60 c

CD@5%

1‐100 % RD

2.125% RD

3.150% RD

CD@5%

nomic requ

tum hybri

yal. Differe

mrajnagar a

espectively

ents positi

mparable w

CAR ‐ All In

nomic reqtion of AIC

s S

15

2

2

2

m

m

m

m

m

DF

DF

DF

uirements

d, NHH‐7

ent levels

and Nandy

y at Dharw

ively up to

with lower

ndia Coord

uirementsCRP on Cot

C

SCY kg/ha

1000

1242

982

811

145

1076

1057

894

122

927

1004

1096

95

of promis

15 registe

of spacing

yal).Higher

wad, Cham

o 150 and

levels. In N

inated Res

s of promitton in Sou

Coimbator

BN/M

hirsut

97.0

110.2

96.1

90.1

12.1

Sp

107.7

109.3

93.7

6.9

Fertilize

94.1

105.0

112.0

7.6

sing pre re

ered signif

g effected

yield was

mrajnagar

d 125% R

Nandyal, 12

D - 14

search Pro

ising pre ruth Zone.

re

M2 BW

tum variet

3.7

2 4.0

3.9

3.8

0.2

pacing (cm)

7 3.7

3 3.9

3.9

0.2

er levels (k

3.7

0 3.9

0 3.9

0.2

leased hirs

ficantly hig

the yield

harvested

and Nan

DF at Dha

25% of RD

oject on Co

eleased hi

(g) SC

ties

7

0

9

8

2

)

7

9

9

2

kg/ha)

7

9

9

2

sutum hyb

gher yield

significant

d with 90 X

dyal. The

arwad and

F was foun

otton – An

irsutum va

CY kg/ha

3074

2861

1297

340

2547

2275

152

2261

2479

2492

187

bridsin Sou

d than loc

tly in all th

X 30 cm, 9

genotype

d Chamraj

nd optimu

nual Repo

arieties un

LAM

BN/ M

65.1

63.3

52.3

4.7

65.3

55.2

4.1

56.3

60.4

64.1

5.0

uth Zone

cal check

hree cente

90 X 45 cm

(NHH‐715

nagar res

m (Table 1

ort (2016 –

nder differ

2 BW (

4.3

4.5

4.1

0.1

4.3

4.3

NS

4.3

4.3

4.3

NS

(RCH 138)

ers (Dharw

m and 90 X

5) respon

pectively

15)

17)

rent

(g)

3

5

1

1

3

3

S

3

3

3

S

) at

wad,

X 60

ded

and

Table15

Treatm

H1: NH

H2: DH

H3.RC

CD( 0

S1:90 x

S2‐90 x

S3:90 x

S4 ‐90 x

S5:90 x

CD( 0

F1‐ 75 %

F2‐ 100

F3‐125

F4‐150

C.D. (P

Agronom

experim

and hig

Coimbat

Coimbat

was opt

ICAR

5: Agronolocatio

ments

HH‐715

H‐263

CH138

0.05)

x 30 cm

45 cm

60 cm

x 75 cm

90 cm

0.05)

% RDF

% RDF

% RDF

% RDF

= 0.05)

mic requir

mented at C

gher perfo

tore, LAM

tore and 9

imum at C

R ‐ All India

mic requin of AICRP

Dh

SCY kg/ha

B

1207

2310

281

1867

1786

1622

137

1608

1749

1919

98

rement of

Coimbator

rmance o

and Raich

90 x 45 cm

Coimbatore

a Coordina

rements oP on Cotto

arwad

BN/ m2 B

75.0 4

127.0 4

9.0

117.0 4

85.0 4

101.0 4

8.0

91.0 4

102.0 4

110.0 4

4.0

three hirs

re, LAM an

f RHH 10

hur (Table

m at LAM a

e and LAM

D

ated Resea

of promisinn in South

BW(g)

SCYkg/h

hirsutum

4.8 121

4.7

NS

Spac

4.7

133

4.8 115

115

4.8

NS 142

Fertilizer l

103

4.7 121

4.8 139

4.9

0.2 112

sutum hyb

nd Raichur

007, SHH 8

16). High

and Raichu

and signif

D - 15

arch Projec

ng pre relh Zone.

Chamraj

Y ha

BN/ p

m Hybrids

12 33

ing (cm)

30 28

56 31

51 39

2 2

evels (kg/

30 29

11 33

96 35

2 3

brids (BGD

r. Genotyp

818, and

yield was

ur. Nutrien

ficant respo

ct on Cotto

eased hirs

jnagar

plant BW(g

s

3.1 4.

8.3 3.

1.9 4.

9.0 4.

.3 0.

/ha)

9.9 3.

3.6 4.

5.6 4.

.1 0.

DHH‐821,

pes perform

BGDHH 8

recorded

nts studies

onse was n

on – Annu

sutum hyb

Wg)

SCY kg/ha

.0 2967

2745

206

.5 2746

.0 2966

.3

.3 160

.7

.0 2675

.2 2813

3080

.4 311

RHH‐1007

mance wa

821 was fo

with spac

s conclude

not observ

al Report

bridsunder

Nandy

a BN/ m

52.2

47.0

4.2

6 47.3

6 51.9

3.3

46.4

47.5

0 54.8

5.3

and SHH

s varying

ound resp

cing of 90

ed that 125

ved at Raic

(2016 – 17

r differen

yal

m2 BW (g

4.1

4.1

NS

4.1

4.1

NS

3.8

4.1

4.4

0.2

‐818) wer

by spatiall

pectively a

x 60 cm a

5 % of RD

hur.

7)

nt

g)

re

ly

at

at

DF

Table

Tr

H1.

H2

H3

H4.M

H5.

S1 ‐

S2‐ S3:

S4 1

S5.1

S6‐1

F1

F2

F3

F4

Agron SpacinCoimb(suvinspacinresporespo

IC

e 16: Agrolocat

reatments

BGDHH 82

2.RHH 1007

3.SHH 818

Mallika non

. RAHH‐45

CD@5%

90 X 45 cm

90 x 60 cm

90 X 75 cm

105X 60 cm

120 x 60 cm

150 x 60 cm

CD@5%

1.75 % RDF

.100% RDF

3.125%RDF

4.150%RDF

CD@5%

nomic requ

ng and nbatore andn) at both ng of 75 Xonse indicaonse was fo

CAR ‐ All In

onomic reqtion of AIC

SCYkg/h

21 999

7 124

980

n Bt 114

5

98

m

m 117

m

m

m 112

m 94

71.9

F 100

F 108

F 114

F

61.4

uirements

utrient red LAM (Tathe place

X 45 cm buated that ound up to

ndia Coord

quirementCRP on Cot

Coimbat

Y ha

BN/ m

9 82.8

45 94.1

0 79.5

44 91.5

8 8.1

73 91.9

23 82.8

2 71.5

94 8.22

05 77.4

89 88.7

44 80.2

45 7.3

of promis

equiremenble 17). Thes of testiut significa100 % RDo 125 % RD

inated Res

ts of promtton in Sou

tore

m2 BW(g)

hirsu

8 4.0

1 4.1

5 3.9

5 4.2

1 NS

Sp

9 4.0

8 4.1

5 4.0

2 NS

Fertilize

4 3.9

7 4.0

2 4.1

3 NS

sing pre re

nt was wohe pre releng. High sant responDF was opDF at Raich

D - 16

search Pro

mising pre uth Zone.

SCY kg/ha

utum Hybr

1667

3106

3449

316

pacing (cm)

2842

2638

143

er levels (k

2590

2727

2904

177

leased bar

orked outeased cultseed cottose was noptimum atur.

oject on Co

released h

LAM

BN/ m2

rids

58.0

74.4

64.0

10.4

)

72.2

58.7

4.3

kg/ha)

62.1

67.2

67.1

NS

rbadense v

t for theture GSB 4on yield wot observe Coimbato

otton – An

hirsutum h

BW(g)

SCkg/

3.8 30

5.0 27

4.9 25

25

0.2 39

4.6 28

27

26

4.6

NS 1

4.6 27

4.6 27

4.5

NS N

varietiesin

barbaden44 outperfowas recordd at Raichore and in

nual Repo

hybrids un

Raic

CY /ha

BN/

044 67

706 57

593 51

560 45

9.3 1.

826 66

723 53

633 46

50 4.

732 52

722 58

NS 1.

n South Zo

nse varietyormed thaed at Coimhur. Studiencomparab

ort (2016 –

nder differ

chur

/ m2 BW

7.3 4.

7.3 4.

1.4 4.

5.7 4.

.3 0.

6.3 4.

3.8 4.

6.2 4.

.7 N

2.4 4.

8.4 4.

.5 0.

ne.

y GSB 44an local chmbatore wes on Nutrible signific

17)

rent

W (g)

.7

.5

.3

.2

.2

.3

.4

.6

NS

.4

.5

.2

4 at heck with ient cant

Table17

Trea

V1‐

V2

CD

S1‐7

S2: 90

S3‐90

S4: 90

S5‐10

CD

F1.7

F2: 10

F3: 12

CD

Agronom

Inter sp

that the

in both

Coimbat

recomm

ICAR

7: Agrondiffere

atments

‐GSB 44

2‐Suvin

D@5%

75×45cm

0 X 30 cm

0×45 cm

0 X 60 cm

05 ×45 cm

D@5%

5 % RDF

00% Rec.

25% Rec.

D@5%

mic requir

ecific hybr

e genotype

centers.

tore and

mended tha

R ‐ All India

nomic reqent locatio

SCY

13

10

1

13

12

9

1

11

12

13

8

ements of

rid (H X B)

e produced

Planting o

Raichur.

at 100 and

a Coordina

quirementson of AICR

Coi

kg/ha

347

015

198

301

264

987

104

117

298

347

89

f promising

), RHB 101

d significan

of 90 X 6

Significa

125 % RD

D

ated Resea

s of promP on Cotto

mbatore

BN/M2

barbaden

92.7

81.6

5.43

Spac

88.7

76.6

70.8

5.0

Fertilizer l

79.4

81.7

88.6

4.0

g pre‐relea

14 was exp

ntly higher

60 cm pro

nt and p

F for Coim

D - 17

arch Projec

mising preon in South

BW (g)

nse varieti

4.09

3.95

NS

ing (cm)

2.9

3.1

3.1

NS

evels (kg/

3.0

3.2

3.3

0.2

ased hirsut

perimente

r seed cott

oduced hi

positive n

mbatore and

ct on Cotto

e releaseh Zone.

SCY k

ies

25

21

6

24

23

22

N

/ha)

22

23

25

tum X barb

ed at Coim

ton yield th

gher yield

nutrient r

d Raichur r

on – Annu

d barbad

R

kg/ha

511

181

6

450

344

244

NS

293

398

5.9

badensehy

mbatore an

han ruling

d than res

response

respective

al Report

dense vari

aichur

BN/ M2

55.3

44.7

0.96

13.2

15.1

17.1

1.96

13.1

17.1

1.5

ybridsin So

nd Raichur

local chec

st of the

was obs

ly (Table 1

(2016 – 17

ietiesunde

BW (g)

3.71

3.49

0.2

3.5

3.6

3.7

NS

3.4

3.8

0.1

outh Zone

and foun

ck (DCH 32

spacing a

erved an

18).

7)

er

.

d

2)

at

d

Table

Tre

H1‐

H2

C

S1‐

S2‐9

S3‐1

S4‐1

C

F1.

F2.

F3.

C

Agron SpacinDharwDharwSignifat Dhrespo

IC

e 18: barb

eatments

‐RHB 1014

2‐DCH 32

CD@5%

‐90×60cm

90X75 cm

120× 60 cm

50 × 60 cm

CD@5%

75 % RDF

100%RDF

125%RDF

CD@5%

nomic requ

ng and nuwad, Nandwad. At Nicant and harwad. Honse was re

CAR ‐ All In

Agronobadensehy

SCY

18

11

3

17

m 13

m 12

1

13

15

15

1

uirements

utrient reqdyal and Nandyal anpositive reowever, seported at

ndia Coord

mic reqybridsunde

Coi

kg/ha

813

185

51

724

373

201

84

371

537

591

37

of promis

uirementsMudhol. Snd Mudhoesponse of significant Mudhol (T

inated Res

uirementser different

mbatore

BN/m2

HX

92.7

81.6

5.7

Sp

88.6

75.6

70.9

5.4

Fertilize

79.4

81.7

88.6

4.0

sing pre re

s of arboreSpacing ofol, plantingf nutrientsnutrient rTable 19).

D - 18

search Pro

s of pt location

BW (g)

XB hybrids

4.1

3.9

NS

pacing (cm)

2.9

3.1

3.1

NS

er levels (k

3.0

3.2

3.3

0.2

leased arb

eum varietf 75 X 30g of 60 Xs applicatioresponse w

oject on Co

romising of AICRP o

SCY k

s

27

26

6

)

28

26

25

N

kg/ha)

26

27

40

boreum va

ties (PA‐740 cm prodX 30 cm won up to thwas not o

otton – An

pre reon Cotton

R

kg/ha

770

645

6.0

839

689

594

NS

669

745

0.9

rieties in S

40 and JLAduced highwas obserhe level of observed a

nual Repo

eleased in South Z

Raichur

BN/ m2

53.4

42.8

1.6

60.9

45.2

38.0

6.0

43.9

52.2

1.6

South Zone

A ‐0603) wh seed corved with 150 % RDat Nandya

ort (2016 –

hirsutum Zone.

BW (

4.7

4.4

NS

4.5

4.6

4.6

NS

4.4

4.7

NS

e

were testedotton yieldhigher yiF was notial and err

17)

X

(g)

7

4

S

5

6

6

S

4

7

S

d at d at eld. iced ratic

Table 19

Treatm

G1: PA

G2: JLA

G3: DL

V2: Ya

CD( 0

S1‐60x

S2‐60 x

S3‐60x

S4‐ 75 x

S5‐ 90 x

CD( 0

F1‐100

F2‐ 125

F3‐ 150

CD (

Effect of CompacSrivillipuwas recgenotypCoimbatyield threcommLAM, Ra

ICAR

9: Agronolocation

ments

A‐740

A‐0603

LSA‐17

aganti

0.05)

x20 cm

x 30 cm

x40 cm

x 30 cm

x 30 cm

0.05)

0 %RDF

5% RDF

0% RDF

0.05)

f compact

ct culturesuthur to ascorded unpe DSC‐130tore and Shan othermended thaaichur and

R ‐ All India

omic requin of AICRP

Dh

SCY kg/ha

1808

1993

2059

184

1931

2115

1813

104

1855

1927

2077

79

culture un

s, ARBC‐13ssess the sder HDPS 02 out yieSrivilliputhr spacing. at 150% ofSrivilliputt

a Coordina

rements oon Cotton

harwad

BN/ m2

141

140

147

NS

140

159

128

9.0

130

144

153

7.0

nder HDPS

301 and spacing anplanting lded at LAur, 75 X 1Nutrient

f RDF for Ctur (Table 2

D

ated Resea

of promisinn in South Z

BW(g)

SCkg/

arboreum

2.8 167

2.8 10

2.5

17

NS 12

Spac

14

2.7 15

2.7

2.7

NS 12

Fertilizer l

2.6 144

2.7 14

2.7 15

NS N

S with diffe

DSC‐1302 nd nutrientat Coimba

AM and Sri10 cm at L requiremCoimbatore20).

D - 19

arch Projec

ng pre‐releZone.

Nand

CY /ha

BN/

m varietie

79 54

52 39

29 59

20 4

ing (cm)

12 47

62 54

25 6.

evels (kg/

44 45

54 51

62 56

S 7.

erent nutr

were test requirematore andivilliputturLAM and Rment for e and 100

ct on Cotto

eased arbo

dyal

m2 BW(g)

es

4.9 2.7

9.1 2.6

9.1 2.7

4 NS

7.2 2.7

4.8 2.7

.4 NS

/ha)

5.9 2.6

1.2 2.6

6.1 2.8

.2 0.2

ient level

sted at Coment. High Raichur, r. High denRaichur wethe cultu% RDF for

on – Annu

oreumvari

W )

SCY kg/ha

7 1106

6 454

7

S 99.4

7 612

7 886

843

S 224.6

6 971

6 650

8 749

22 89.1

in South Z

oimbatoreher perforin contransity plantere yieldeures wereother thre

al Report

eties unde

Mudho

a BN/ m

56

29

5.6

35

45

48

6 3.9

46

40

43

4.1

Zone

e, LAM, Rmance of st to thatting of 60 d higher se experimee tested c

(2016 – 17

er differen

ol

2 BW (g

2

2

0.2

2

2

2

0.3

2

2

2

0.2

aichur anARBC‐130t the otheX 10 cm aseed cottoented ancenters viz

7)

nt

g)

d 1 er at n d .,

Table

Treat

V1.ARB

V2.DS

V3.TC

CD@

S1.60 x

S2.75 x

S3.75 X

S4.90 x

S5.90X

CD@

F1.100

F2.125

F3.150

CD@

Result

was h

under

optim

Table

Trea

S1: 45

S2: 60

S3: 75

S4: 90

CD

F1 –7

F2‐ 10

F3‐ 1

F3‐ 1

C.D

IC

e 20: Effect

ments Skg

BC 1301 1

C 1302 1

H 1819 1

@5% 3

x 10 cm 1

x 10 cm 1

X30 cm

x 10 cm 1

X60 cm

@5% 2

0% RDF 1

5%RDF 1

0%RDF 1

@5% 1

ts of agron

harvested w

r high dens

mum at Dha

e 21: Effect

atments

5 x 10 cm

0 x10 cm

5 x 10 cm

0 x 20 cm

D( 0.05)

75%RDF

00% RDF

25% RDF

50% RDF

D.( 0.05)

CAR ‐ All In

t of compa

Coimbat

SCY g/ha

BN/m

2

1761 76.1

1352 70.1

1398 71.5

382 13.8

1834 78.4

1567 69.9

1269 63.8

223 10

1281 68.4

1603 76.1

1785 78.4

163 7.1

nomic requ

with signif

sity plantin

arwad, Nan

t of compa

D

SCY kg/ha

2058

1908

1893

1791

170

1723

1876

2139

122

ndia Coord

act culture

tore

/ BW (g)

1 3.9

1 3.8

5 3.8

8 NS

4 3.7

9 3.8

8 3.91

NS

4 3.7

1 3.8

4 3.8

NS

uirement f

ficantly hig

ng system.

ndyal and

act culture

Dharwad

BN/ m2

110.3

106.1

91.3

82.9

9.8

92.8

95.5

104.7

6.7

inated Res

under HD

LA

SCY kg/ha

BN

3324 13

2546 11

475 4

Sp

3292 16

3266 16

2245 5

192.5 5

Fertiliz

2906 12

2991 12

2907 13

NS 5

for compa

gher seed

Nutrient s

Chamrajna

(SCS 1206

BW(g)

Skg

Sp

4.3 3

4.5 3

4.3 3

4.5

NS 1

Fertilize

4.3 3

4.4 3

4.6 3

0.2 4

D - 20

search Pro

DPS with di

AM

N/m2

BW(g)

varieties

39.5 3.9

16.3 4.4

4.3 0.08

pacing (cm)

62.6 4.2

62.4 4.1

8.6 4.2

5.8 NS

zer levels (kg

25.1 4.2

26.4 4.1

32.1 4.1

.84 NS

ct culture

cotton yie

studies rev

agar respe

6) under H

Nan

SCY g/ha

BN

pacing (cm)

854 6

384 6

355 6

175 3

er levels (k

181 6

724 6

688 6

471 7

oject on Co

ifferent nu

R

SCY kg/ha

2559

2900

147

2694

2925

2568

195

g/ha)

2612

2736

2840

NS

SCS‐1206

eld at Dhar

vealed that

ectively (Ta

DPS with d

dyal

N/ m2 BW(g

)

68.0 5.

66.0 4.

61.4 4.

3.5 0.

kg/ha)

3.

60.5 4.

69.7 4.

65.2

7.1 0.

otton – An

utrient leve

Raichur

BN/ m

2

B(g

151 4

168.3 4

12.6 0

177.3 4

158.6 4

143.1 5

5.1 0

153.1 4

159.5 4

166.4 4

NS N

found tha

rwad, Nan

t 150, 125

able 21).

different n

Wg)

SCYkg/ha

.0 1360

.1 1239

.1 1123

.6 151

.9 1192

.7 1250

.5 1381

.6 119

nual Repo

el in South

S

W g)

SCY kg/ha

4.7 1885

4.9 2024

0.1 60

4.5 2142

4.7 1892

.1

1829

0.1 73

4.7 1872

4.8 2049

4.9 1942

NS 73

t spacing o

ndyal and C

and 100 %

nutrient lev

Chamraj

a BN/pl

0 5.0

9 7.1

3 8.4

1.0

2 5.8

0 7.3

1 7.4

1.0

ort (2016 –

h Zone

rivilliputtur

BN/ m

2

147

162

9.8

185

153

127

12.1

151

161

152

NS

of 45 X 10

Chamrajna

% of RDF w

vel in SZ

jnagar

ant BW

0 3.

1 3.

4 4.

0 0.

8 3.

3 3.

4 4.

0 0.

17)

BW (g)

3.1

3.4

0.1

3.3

3.3

3.3

NS

3.3

3.3

3.3

NS

cm

agar

were

W (g)

.3

.8

.0

.6

.5

.7

.0

.3

Agrono

Central Recommspray + gave sig(4729 krespecticloser sSurat (2(Table 2 Table 22

T1 :Bt hy

T2:T1+Clo

T3 :T2+12

T4 :T3 + r

T5 T45+

T6:T5+ loreddeni

South Zo Recommspray + gave sigNandyalcent resless thakg/ha, 4

ICAR

omy II: Ag

Zone

mended Btmicronutr

gnificantly kg/ha)and ively than pacing (252598 kg/ha22.)

2:Seed cot

ybrid

oser spacin

25 % of re

recommen

micro nut

ocation spng

one

mended Btmicronutrgnificantly l (3595kg/spectively hn Rec.) + 44.6% highe

R ‐ All India

ronomica

t hybrid + rient (soil higher seeIndore (3control (T15% less tha) which w

tton yield a

Treatme

ng (25% le

ecommend

nded foliar

rients (soil

ecific mea

CD at 5

hybrid + crient soil ahigher seha) and Chhigher tha125% RDFer)(Table2

a Coordina

al perform

closer spaapplicatioed cotton 3561 kg/h1.Bt hybridan Rec.) +was 95.8 %

as influenc

ents

ss than Re

ded Nutrien

spray

l applicatio

sures for c

5 %

closer spacapplicationeed cottohamrajanan control (F + Recom23 ).

D

ated Resea

mance of r

cing (25% n) + locatiyield at Aha); whichd with exist+ 125% RD% higher t

ced by diff

ec.)

nts

on)

control of

cing (25% n + location yield atagar (1113(T1), whermmended f

D - 21

arch Projec

ruling Bt h

less than ion specifiAkola (2868h were 35ting practiDF + Recomhan contr

ferent pac

Ako

211

256

268

276

281

286

42

less than on specific t Coimbat kg/ha) whreas Recomfoliar spra

ct on Cotto

hybrids in

Rec.) + 12c measure8 kg/ha), N5.8,23.2,85ces). Whemmended ol (T1. Bt

kage of ru

Seed

ola Nand

12 250

67 280

83 295

67 300

14 306

68 309

2 277.5

Rec.) + 12measuresore (2134hich were mmended ay (T4) out

on – Annu

n Central Z

5% RDF + es for contNanded (35.7,and 42ereas recomfoliar sprahybrid wi

ling Bt hyb

d Cotton y

ded Surat

9 1327

7 1848

5 2033

3 2598

1 2161

0 2213

54 432

5% RDF + s for contr4 kg/ha), R30.1 , 31.0Bt hybrid +t yielded a

al Report

Zone

Recommetrol of red090 kg/ha2.1 per cmmended ay (T5) outth existing

brids in Ce

yield (kg/ha

t Junaga

7 2546

8 2712

3 2877

8 3580

1 4218

3 4729

132

Recommerol of reddRaichur (30, 81.4 an+ closer spat Srivillipu

(2016 – 17

ended foliaddening (T6), Junagarcent higheBt hybrid t yielded ag practices

entral Zone

a)

rh Indor

2506

2858

2991

3105

3437

3561

310.9

ended foliadening (T63777kg/had 80.1 pepacing (25%uttur (265

7)

ar

6) h er + at s)

e

re

6

8

1

5

7

1

9

ar

6) ), er % 1

Table

T1 :Bt

T2:T1+

T3 :T2+

T4 :T3

T5 T45T6:T5+contro

CD at

Agron

North

WeedIndore0.75 chlorihighekg/hafollowa.i/haIndorependiglyphhighe Table

T1: Pe+ one

T2: TaSodiumhoeing

T3 :Chweed

T4: T1should

T5: T1weed

T6 :T1

T7. T1

T8: We

T9: We

CD at

IC

e23: Seed c

T

hybrid

+Closer spac

+125 % of

+ recomme

5+ micro nu

+ location sol of redde

5 %

nomy III:

h Zone

d‐free chece, Nandyakg a.i/ha muron ethr seed cota)(Table 24wed by posa at 2‐4 leae (1959 kimethalin osate @ 5st seed cot

e 24: Seed c

endimethalihoeing

nk mixture m @ 62.5g ag

hlorimuron E+ one hoein

+ Cover crod be sown 2

+ Glyphosaleaf stage (

+ T2

+ T3

eed Free ch

eedy check

5%

CAR ‐ All In

cotton yiel

Treatments

cing (25% l

recommen

ended folia

utrients (so

specific mening

Weed M

ck gave sil and Chamas pre e

hyl @ 4.0gtton yield (4). Applicast emergeaf stage okg/ha) an@ 1.0 kg 5 ml/litre tton yield

cotton yieTrea

n @ 0.75 to

(Quizalofopa.i/hat 2‐4 l

Ethyl @ 4.0ng

op with cow20 DAS of co

te @ 5 ml/lafter hoeing

heck

ndia Coord

d as influe

s

ess than Re

nded Nutrie

ar spray

oil applicati

asures for

Manageme

ignificantlymrajnagar.emergenceg a.i/ha as (3903 kg/htion of pence sprayif weeds +d Chamraa.i/ha as at 2‐4 le(4177 kg/h

ld as influeatments

o 1.0 kg a.i/h

pethyl 50 g leaf stage o

0g a.i/ha as a

wpea/sunnhotton

litre as direcg)

inated Res

enced by d

Co

ec.)

ents

on)

r

ent in Bt C

y higher s. Among the + one hat 2‐4 leafha) at Bansendimethang of pyrit+one hoeinajnagar (2pre emer

eaf stage oha).

enced by W

ha as Pre em

a.i/ha+ Pyrof weeds + o

at 2‐4 leaf s

hemp/ sorgh

cted spray a

D - 22

search Pro

different pa

oimbatore

1589

1867

1904

2014

2067

2134

374

Cotton

seed cottohe chemicahoeing folf stage of swara, whlin @ 1.0 thiobac song register216 kg/hargence + oof weeds

Weed Man

m.or PPI

ithiobac one

stage

hum

at 2‐4

oject on Co

ackage of Seed c

Raichur

2883

3189

3268

3314

3673

3777

843

on yield inal weed colowed by weeds + oich was onkg a.i/ha

odium @ 6ed significa). At Naone hoeins (after ho

nagement Banswara

2171

3022

3357

3087

2893

3682

3903

4038

1572

490

otton – An

ruling Bt hotton yield

Srivillipu

1834

2131

2246

2651

2411

2576

153

n all four ontrol metpost em

one hoeingn par with as pre em

62.5g a.i/hcantly highndyal theng followeoeing) regi

practices Indore

1497

1724

1415

1103

1761

1959

1704

2982

685

272

nual Repo

hybrids in cd (kg/ha)

uttur Nan

4 19

1 24

6 26

1 27

1 28

6 35

5

locations thods, penergence ag registereweed free

mergence a + quizaloher seed co results rd by direcistered the

in Bt CottoNandyal

3213

2702

2607

3128

4177

3617

3200

4184

1625

719

ort (2016 –

central zo

ndyal C

Na

982 61

491 93

690 74

747 88

861 10

595 11

28 20

of Banswdimethalinapplicationd significae check (4+ one hoeofopethyl otton yieldrevealed tcted spraye significa

on Chamrajna

1500

1906

1324

1583

2007

2216

1784

2267

591

375

17)

ne

C. gar

18

38

43

82

077

113

06

ara, n @ n of ntly 038 eing 50g d at that y of ntly

agar

Agrono North Zo Studies drip irrignitrogenthan 0.6Similarlyincreasinincreasea treatmand fertbeen recCPE) as c Table25

Tr

I1 (0.6 CP

I2 ( 0.8 C

I3 (1.0 CP

CD (0.05

F1 ( 50 %

F2 ( 75 %

F3 (100 %

CD (0.05

Control (Surface100% RD

Moistur

Drip irrihighest kg/ha), wyield (37residue

ICAR

omy IV: Im

one

on drip fegation regn. Irrigatio6 CPE (2736y, among ng dose fre was signiment combtilizer as cocorded. Thcompared

5: Monetar

reatments

PE )

CPE)

PE )

5)

% RDN)

% RDN)

% RDN)

5)

e method wDN)

re conserva

igation coseed cottwhich wer715 kg ha‐mulch (5t/

R ‐ All India

mproving

rtigation inimes, optin regime o6 kg/ha), anitrogen rom 50% ficant onlybination ofompared tohe highest to rest all

ry,efficienc

r(

7

9

9

1

7

1

9

1

with 9

ation tech

mbined wton yield are 61.3, 44‐1) was rec/ha) at Ako

a Coordina

use efficie

n Bt hybridmum nitroof 0.8 CPEalthough itlevels theRD (2590 y up to 75 %f I2 (0.8 CPo 100 %Rdnet returntreatment

cy parame

Net returns Rs/ha)

78677

99095

97218

13126

74107

101472

99411

14444

96469

hniques for

with differeat Banswa4.2, 78.0 pecorded in cola was 42

D

ated Resea

ency of in

ds were coogen dose recorded t was at paere was akg/ha) to%. The indPE) along wd N and I3 (ns of Rs.99ts (Table 2

eters and y

B:C ratio (Kg

Irrigatio

1.74

2.05

2.02

0.20

Nitrog

1.72

2.09

2.00

0.26

2.27

r enhancin

ent mulchara (4422 er cent higcrop residu.7 % highe

D - 23

arch Projec

nputs (wa

onducted we and the isignificant

ar with an a linear imo 75% (332dicated higwith 75% 1.0 CPE) w095/ha an5)

yield of Bt

NUE g SCY/kg fapplied)

on regimes

8.19

9.73

9.66

1.03

gen levels

11.0

9.46

7.05

1.60

6.6

ng cotton p

hes revealekg/ha), In

gher than cue mulch (r than con

ct on Cotto

ater and n

with the obinteractiontly better irrigation rmproveme21kg/ha) thest seed Rd N, the

where seedd B: C ratio

cotton (RC

fert. (kg

s

productivit

ed that pondore (307control. At(5t/ha). Thntrol (Table

on – Annu

nutrient)

bjective ton effect beseed cottoregime of ent in seeto 100% (cotton yiereby indicad cotton yieo 2.05 wer

CH650) un

WUE g/ha/mm)

4.0

4.7

4.5

NS

3.7

4.7

4.7

0.4

3.5

ty under d

olymulchin73 kg/ha) t Akola thehe increasee 26).

al Report

o find out tetween irron yield (31.0 CPE (3ed cotton 3303 kg/hld of 3638ative of saeld of 3419re recorde

der drip fe

) Seeyield

rip irrigati

ng had recand Junae highest Se in yield d

(2016 – 17

the suitabligation an3266 kg/ha212 kg/hayield wit

ha), thoug kg/ha witaving wate9 kg/ha had for I2 (0.

ertigation

ed cotton d (Kg/ha)

2736

3266

3212

372

2590

3321

3303

337

3087

ion

corded thgarh (359Seed cottodue to cro

7)

e d a) ). h h h er as 8

e 1 n p

Table

T1 : C

T2: Po

T3: Ne

T4 : C

T5: Du

T6. : P

CD at

Agron North The orecom(PPFMcowpyield respe Table

T1.Ab

T2.Co

T3.RD

T4. Seand fo

T5.Ne

T6.Raincorp

T7.Intnut/so

T8.T4

T9.T4

T10.T

T11: T

Centr The orecomat flowgram/

IC

e 26: Seed c

ontrol

olymulch

ewspaper

rop residu

ust mulch

Polymulch

5%

nomy V: T

h Zone

organic nmmended M) at floweea betweeat Srigangctively hig

e 27:Seed c

bsolute con

ontrol (RDN

D of Nutrie

eed treatmoliar applic

eem cake 2

ising of Suporated be

tercroppinoybean

+T5

+T6

T4+T5+T6

T4+ T5 + T7

ral Zone

organic nummended bwering, so/ ground n

CAR ‐ All In

cotton yie

Treat

mulch

ue mulch (5

by hoeing

on ridges

Technolog

nutrient m bio fertiering, soil en rows inganagar (26her than c

cotton yiel

Trea

ntrol (No o

N through i

nt through

ment and socation of P

250 kg/ha

unnhemp /efore flowe

g with gre

7

utrient mabio fertilizeoil applicatnut/soybea

ndia Coord

ld as influe

ments

5t/ha)

and furrow

gy for Org

managemenilizers, folapplicationcorporate690kg/ha)control (ap

d as influe

atment sch

organic & In

inorganic)

h organic b

oil applicatPFM

fodder coering

en gram/b

CD at 5 %

anagementers, foliar ation of Neean register

inated Res

enced by d

w with drip

ganic Cott

nt packagiar applican of Neemed before and Kanppplication o

enced by o

hedule

norganic)

based on P

tion of rec.

owpea betw

black gram/

%

t packageapplicationem cake 2red signific

D - 24

search Pro

different m

B

p

ton Produ

ges includation of p

m cake @ 2flowering pur (552 kgof RDN thr

organic nut

equivalen

. bio fertili

ween rows

/ ground

s includinn of pink p250 kg/ha cantly high

oject on Co

mulches un

Banswara

2742

4422

3206

3900

3571

‐

399

uction

ding Seed pink pigm250 kg/ha registeredg/ha) whicrough inorg

trient man

t basis

sers

s

g Seed trpigmentedand Inteher seed co

otton – An

nder drip i

Indore

2131

3073

2463

2696

2329

‐

283

treatmenmented fac and raisind significanch were 1ganic)(Tab

nagement

Srigangan

1929

2284

2294

2177

2482

2206

2042

2500

2187

2690

2665

383

reatment ad facultativercropping otton yield

nual Repo

rrigation s

e Akola

2604

3461

‐

3715

2836

3218

531

nt, soil acultative ng of Sunhntly higher17.8 and 4ble 27)

packages

nagar

9

4

4

7

2

6

2

0

7

0

5

and soil ave methylowith gree

d at Akola

ort (2016 –

system

Junaga

2017

3591

2917

3069

2626

‐

680

pplicationmethylotrhemp / fodr seed cot46.4 per c

Kanpur

296

377

456

520

526

512

497

547

549

552

548

56

applicationotrops (ppen gram/bla (2630 kg/

17)

arh

7

1

7

9

6

0

of rops dder tton cent

n of pfm) lack /ha)

and Ba(applicatbased PKhandw Table28

T

T1.AbsolInorganic

T2.Contr

T3.RD of based on

T4. Seed applicatioand folia

T5.Neem

T6.Raisincowpea bincorpora

T7.Intercgram/blanut/soyb

T8.T4+T5

T9.T4+T6

T10.T4+T

T11: T4+

CD at 5 %

South Zo Applicathighest includinpink pigkg/ha anregistereNone of

ICAR

nswara (2tion of RDP on equivwa, Nanded

8:Seed cott

Treatment s

ute control c)

ol (RDN thr

Nutrient thn P equivale

treatment on of rec. br applicatio

m cake 250 k

ng of Sunhembetween roated before

cropping witack gram/ gbean

5

6

T5+T6

T5 + T7

%

one

tion of recseed cottg seed tregmented fand raising ed significaf the packa

R ‐ All India

2882 kg/haDN througvalent basd and Rahu

ton yield a

schedule

(No organi

rough inorga

hrough orgaent basis

and soil io fertilisers

on of PPFM

kg/ha

mp / foddeows e flowering

th green round

ommendeton yield eatment anacultative of Sunhemantly higheage was co

a Coordina

a) which wh inorganis registeruri (Table 2

as influenc

Akola

c & 162

anic) 237

anic 227

s 179

192

r 182

252

210

189

222

263

399

ed nutrientat LAM (nd soil appmethylotrmp / foddeer seed cotmparable

D

ated Resea

were 10.8 ic). Appliced the hig28).

ed by orga

Bansw

ara

0 783

3 2836

1 2231

6 1891

5 2188

6 1895

6 1638

2 2387

8 2173

3 2839

0 2882

9 331

ts through (2214 kg/hplication orops (PPFMer cowpeatton yield awith Contr

D - 25

arch Projec

and 1.6 ation of rghest seed

anic nutrie

Bhaw

anipatna

Indore

879 68

1530 121

1496 99

982 82

1085 80

1029 79

926 85

1319 83

1272 74

1384 77

1235 88

162 21

organic baha). The of recommeM) at flowea between at Srivillipurol (RDN th

ct on Cotto

per cent recommend cotton y

ent manag

Indore

Junagarh

87 814

10 932

97 911

20 901

08 982

92 959

52 923

37 969

41 1005

72 1014

80 1151

10 NS

ased P on organic nuended bioering, soil arows incouttur (1372hrough ino

on – Annu

high as cded nutrieyield at Bh

ement pac

Khanpur

Kh

d

810 7

1028 13

1347 12

1419 11

1450 8

1388 84

1337 80

1468 10

1460 8

1470 8

1462 10

105 7

equivalenutrient ma fertilizersapplicationorporated 2 kg/ha) thorganic) at

al Report

compared ents throuhawanipat

ckages

Khandwa

Nanded

80 675

380 962

252 768

188 739

92 677

48 431

02 403

052 746

14 488

67 515

029 491

77 143

t basis reganagemens, foliar apn of Neem before flohan other tDharwad

(2016 – 17

to contrough organina, Indore

Rahuri

Surat

646 55

1345 63

1301 55

1053 51

1074 58

988 62

830 51

1199 46

1189 76

1248 43

1230 49

264 NS

gistered tht packageplication ocake @25wering hatreatments(Table 29)

7)

ol ic e,

Surat

53

34

55

19

81

26

14

64

67

30

93

S

e es of 0 d s. .

Table

T1.AbInorga

T2.Co

T3.RDbased

T4. Seof recapplic

T5.Ne

T6.Racowpbefor

T7.Intgram/

T8.T4

T9.T4

T10.T

T11: T

CD at

Agron

Faridkcontro

Table

T1 : Co

T2: Su

T3: Su

T4 : Cr

T5: Cro

CD (0

IC

e 29:Seed c

Treatm

bsolute conanic)

ontrol (RDN

D of Nutried on P equi

eed treatmc. bio fertilcation of P

eem cake @

ising of .Suea betweee flowerin

tercroppin/black gram

+T5

+T6

T4+T5+T6

T4+ T5 + T7

5 %

nomy VI:

Cross sukot (3829 ol respecti

e 30: Yield

ontrol/No

b soiling a

b soiling a

ross sub so

oss sub so

.05)

CAR ‐ All In

cotton yiel

ment sche

ntrol (No o

N through i

nt throughivalent bas

ment and soisers and fPFM

@250 kg/h

unnhemp /en rows incg

g with grem/ ground

7

Exploitin

ub soiling kg/ha) andively; wher

and yield c

T

sub soiling

t 1.0 m dis

t 1.5 m dis

oiling at 1.0

iling at 1.5

ndia Coord

d as influe

dule

organic &

inorganic)

h organic sis

oil applicatfoliar

ha

/ fodder corporated

en nut/soybe

g the pot

at 1.0m xd Bhatindareasnon‐si

contributi

reatments

g

stance

stance

0m x1.0 m

5m x1.5 m

inated Res

enced by o

Dha

5

1

1

tion

1

1

d 1

ean 6

1

1

1

1

1

tential of

x 1.0 m dia (2733 kggnificant r

ng charact

s

distance

distance

D - 26

search Pro

organic nut

arwad LA

598 12

465 21

163 22

131 15

087 15

054 15

678 16

036 19

137 19

140 21

017 21

179 1

sub soilin

stance gavg/ha), whicresults wer

ters of cott

oject on Co

trient man

AM Nand

298 57

171 96

214 94

569 88

558 80

534 78

644 58

911 92

906 89

119 84

168 86

185 17

ng in cotto

ve significch was 33re recorded

ton under

Fa

otton – An

nagement

dyal Sriv

76

61

43

84

02

81

88

24

92

46

62

78

on cultiva

antly high.6 and 33d at Surat

different

Seed co

aridkot

2864

3635

3688

3829

3723

605

nual Repo

packages

villiputtur

890

945

926

1090

982

1075

964

1105

1149

1372

1205

242

ation

er seed co.7 per cen(Table30).

sub soiling

otton yield

Bhatind

2044

2525

2398

2733

2569

367

ort (2016 –

Coimbat

507

1314

618

603

703

643

598

788

718

835

798

114

otton yieldnt higher t

g treatmen

d (kg/ha

da Sur

248

250

248

265

264

N

17)

tore

4

d at han

nts

rat

88

06

81

55

41

S

Agrono North Zo Evaluatihighest genotypSriganga Table 31

PA‐255

PA‐08

PA‐528

PA‐760

PA 402

ROJA

CISA 6‐2

CISA 6‐2

Phule Dh

G COT 1

TKA‐910

DLSA‐17

CISA 6‐2

CISA 33‐

Local BG

CD at 5%

Central Desi (ar

cotton y

Rahuri t

760, G C

and DLS

(Table 3

ICAR

omy VIII:

one

on of longseed cott

pes. The geanagr and

1:Seed cot

Entr

2

256

hanvantri

5

02/3

7

209

‐8

G II check

%

Zone

rboreum) g

yield than

he higher

COT 15 and

SA‐17 (1690

2).

R ‐ All India

Evaluatio

g linted arton yield aenotype, Cincompara

tton yield (

ies

genotypes

other des

seed cotto

d DLSA‐17

0 kg/ha) re

a Coordina

on of Desi

rboreum inat FaridkoISA6‐2 proable with o

(kg/ha) of

G COT 15

si genotype

on yield wa

at Akola a

ecorded th

D

ated Resea

(arboreu

n North zoot and theoduced theother Desi

Desi (arbo

Faridko

915

1335

1223

1520

1117

1309

1512

1567

2401

1511

1079

746

1488

1191

274

5 (1824 kg/

es includin

as recorde

nd with PA

he highest

D - 27

arch Projec

um) genot

one found e performe significangenotypes

oreum) gen

ot

5

3

0

7

9

2

7

1

1

9

8

1

/ha) and R

ng local BG

d by the ge

A‐255 and

seed cotto

ct on Cotto

types und

that Phuleance was tly highests.(Table 31

notypes un

Sirsa

1742

1375

1475

1303

1392

1620

3281

1881

2212

2420

2542

2664

2786

2908

3030

252

Roja (2062

GII check a

enotype, R

DLSA‐17 a

on yield at

on – Annu

der HDPS c

e Dhanvanincompart seed cott1)

nder HDPS

S

2 kg/ha) re

at Bhawan

Roja; which

at Rahuri. C

Nanded a

al Report

cultivatio

ntri had rerable with ton yield at

S cultivatio

Srigangana

872

753

654

667

1107

1103

2020

1354

1440

1160

708

901

1444

1029

‐

234

egistered h

nipatna. At

h was on p

CISA 6‐2 (1

and Surat r

(2016 – 17

on

ecorded th any othet SIRSA an

on

agar

higher see

t Akola an

par with PA

1793 kg/ha

respectivel

7)

e er d

d

d

A‐

a)

y

Table

PA‐25

PA‐08

PA‐52

PA‐76

PA 40

ROJA

CISA 6

CISA 6

Phule

G COT

TKA‐9

DLSA‐

CISA 6

CISA 3

Local

CD at

South

HigheNandycotton(1278COT 1(4085G COT

Table

PA‐25

PA‐08

PA‐52

PA‐76

PA 40

ROJA

CISA 6

CISA 6

Phule

G COT

TKA‐9

DLSA‐

CISA 6

CISA 3

Local

CD at

IC

e 32: Seed cEntries

55

8

28

60

2

6‐2

6‐256

Dhanvantr

T 15

9102/3

‐17

6‐209

33‐8

BG II check

5%

h Zone

er yield peryal and Con yield a8 kg/ha). T15 (2165 k5 kg/ha) foT 15 (2270

e 33:Seed cEntries

55

8

28

60

2

6‐2

6‐256

Dhanvantr

T 15

9102/3

‐17

6‐209

33‐8

BG II check

5%

CAR ‐ All In

cotton yies

ri

k

rformanceoimbatore at Dharwahe other pkg/ha) andr LAM and kg/ha) we

cotton yiel

ri

k

ndia Coord

ld (kg/ha)Akola

2100

1956

1594

2337

1946

2396

1196

1156

1807

2169

1646

2291

282

of desi geexcept Dhd (1624 kpromising gd DLSA ‐17 Roja (122ere high pe

d (kg/ha) Dharwa

1346

1294

1288

1240

1425

1331

1234

1300

1624

1312

1284

1363

3314

225

inated Res

of Desi (aBh

enotypes wharwad (Takg/ha), Mugenotypes7 (2078 kg20 kg/ha) ferforming g

of Desi (arad M

6

4

8

0

5

1

4

0

4

2

4

3

4

D - 28

search Pro

rboreum) hawanipatn

1577

1206

1562

1345

1314

1500

1020

1438

1484

1824

1299

1283

1453

357.7

was observable 33). Pudhole (22s observedg/ha) at Mfor Nandyagenotypes

rboreum) gMudhole

1650

1554

1580

1494

1753

1969

1814

1604

2225

2165

1588

2078

1834

242

oject on Co

genotypena

ved than loPhule Dhan25 kg/ha), were PA 4Mudhole, Pal. In Coims.

genotypesLAM

3961

3630

4085

2683

3068

3547

3724

2791

4278

3766

3220

3626

4009

458

otton – An

s under HDNanded

1537

907

1178

1172

1106

1479

1793

1366

1777

1010

1088

1002

1704

893

2381

314

ocal BG II cnvantri rec, LAM (42402 (1425 PA‐255 (39batore, CIS

s under HDNandy

1012

537

456

593

642

1220

899

598

1278

716

599

571

826

159

nual Repo

DPS cultivaRahur

1916

1309

1579

1544

1571

2062

1258

856

1228

1499

1484

1790

1961

370

check at Mcorded the78 kg/ha) kg/ha) at 961 kg/haSA 6‐2 (268

DPS cultivayal C

2

7

6

3

2

0

9

8

8

6

9

1

6

9

ort (2016 –

ation ri Sur

119

126

94

96

128

114

150

114

106

124

114

169

176

23

Mudhole, LAe highest sand Nand Dharwad) and PA‐80 kg/ha)

ation Coimbatore

1840

2220

1990

2140

2060

2160

2680

2110

1680

2270

1750

2070

1790

1000

760

430

17)

rat

90

69

7

1

83

45

07

46

69

45

46

90

66

3

AM, eed dyal d, G 528 and

e

Agrono

RooHowevehirsutummatter wnon‐Bt c(Table 3 Table 34

Ge

Ankur 30

Ankur 30

MRC 70

MRC 70

Bioseed

Bioseed

F2228

FDK124/

CD (p=0

Agronohirsutu North Zo

The exp

and yie

differen

location

flowerin

and Bat

recorded

revealed

had rec

statistica

no bene

and yield

At Sriga

1500g/h

ICAR

omy IX. St

t length ofer, betweem and arbowas significounterpar4).

4: Root & S

enotypes

028 Bt

028 non Bt

17 Bt

17 non Bt

6588 Bt

6588 non

/LD 494

.05)

omy X: Paim cotton

one

eriment w

eld of cot

nces in mo

ns of Farid

ng) resulted

hinda. App

d 8.9,10.1

d that app

corded 1.0

ally at par

efit of appl

d of cotton

anganagar,

ha + Fluisa

R ‐ All India

udies on

f desi cottoen Bt and oretum vacantly higrts of each

Shoot para

Fa

t

Bt

id trial 1 F

was conduc

tton (Goss

nopods, sy

dkot and

d in the sig

plication o

and 9.5 p

lication of

0,3.2 and

with cont

ication of

n (Table 35

the resu

an @ 100m

a Coordina

rooting p

on remainenon Bt coarieties havher in both hybrid did

ameters of

Root Leng

aridkot

56.5

59.3

45.4

53.0

59.3

54.8

58.8

87.5

9.9

Field eval

cted with o

sypium hi

ympodia, b

Bathinda.

gnificantly

of Z20 @ 10

er cent inc

f Z20 @ 10

9.9 per ce

trol in both

Z20 or Flu

5).

lts were d

ml/ha had

D

ated Resea

pattern of

ed higher tounterpartve more rh hirsutumd not show

f different

gth (cm)

Bathinda

47.5

46.7

48.3

43.4

50.3

48.8

55.1

56.2

5.8

uation of

objective to

irsutum).

boll weigh

The cont

highest yi

000, 1500

crease in s

000, 1500

ent increa

h the place

sian at any

differed fr

d recorded

D - 29

arch Projec

Bt / non

than Bt ants there wroot lengthm and arbowed any sig

t genotype

Shoot

Faridko

66.2

65.0

60.6

52.5

61.5

64.8

61.6

64.3

NS

f Z20 and

o study the

The resu

ht, bolls pe

trol (stand

eld of 278

and 2000g

eed cotton

and 2000g

ase respec

es of testi

y of the te

om Faridk

d significan

ct on Cotto

Bt and De

d non Bt hwere no dih than all oretum vargnificant d

es (arboreu

t Length (c

ot Bathi

53.7

54

46.6

47

48

48.

58

63.

6.1

Flusian Z

e effect of

lts found

er sqm and

dard i.e fo

6 and 2100

g/ha comb

n yield at F

g/ha comb

ctively in s

ng. The re

sted dose

kot and Ba

ntly the hi

on – Annu

esi cotton

hybrids andfference fthe hybridrieties thadifference a

um, hirsutu

cm) Ro

inda Fa

75

.5

63

.0

.0

13

.0

25

11

20 as folia

f Z20 and F

that the

d seed cot

our sprays

0 kg/ha re

bined with

Faridkot; T

bined with

seed cotto

esults conc

on the im

athinda. A

ighest see

al Report

n

d hirsutumfor root leds. Similarn the hybras regards

um, Bt and

oot Dry ma

aridkot

13.0

14.2

11.5

12.2

19.0

22.0

21.3

18.8

NS

ar applica

Flusian Z20

ere were

tton yield a

s of KNO3

spectively

Flusian @

The result a

Flusian @

on yield w

cluded that

provemen

Application

d cotton y

(2016 – 17

m genotypeength. Botrly root drrids. Bt an dry matte

d non Bt)

atter (gm)

Bathinda

10.9

10.9

10.5

8.1

9.7

8.8

14.3

14.6

1.5

ation in

0 on growt

significan

at both th

3 @ 2% a

at Faridko

@ 100 ml/h

at Bathind

@ 100 ml/h

which wer

t there wa

t of growt

n of Z20 @

yield (304

7)

es. h ry d er

a

th

nt

e

at

ot

ha

da

ha

re

as

th

@

1

kg/ha

Z20 @

with a

Table

T

Z20 @Flusian

Z20 @Flusian

Z20 @Flusian

Z20 @

Z20 @

Z20 @

Controspraysflower

Controapplic

CD (p=

Agron

North The egrowtsignifresultfor imSrigan

IC

a) but it wa

@ 1000 g/h

application

e 35: Yield

Treatments

@ 1000 g/han @ 100 ml

@ 1500 g/han @ 100 ml

@ 2000 g/han 100 ml/ha

@ 1000g/ha

@ 1500g/ha

@ 2000g/ha

ol‐ Standards of KNO3 2%ring)

ol(No ation)

=0.05)

nomy X: Pt

h Zone

experimentth and deicant diffets clearly rmprovemenganagar)

CAR ‐ All In

as at par w

ha + Flusia

n of Z20 @

attributes

s Skg

+ /ha

23

+ /ha

23

+ a

23

d(4 % at 27

21

3

Paid trial treatmen

t was conevelopmenerences foevealed thent in seeof North Z

ndia Coord

with applica

an @ 100 m

1000 g/ha

and seed Faridk

SCY g/ha

BN/

302 85.

327 83.

314 82.

786 98.

113 81.

346 11.

2 Field et

ducted wit of Gossyor all growhat there wed cottonZone (Table

inated Res

ation of Z2

ml/ha (278

a + Flusian

cotton yiekot

/m2 BW (g)

.0 3.9

.8 3.7

.9 3.8

.6 3.9

.1 3.18

.8 0.25

evaluation

th the objypium hirswth and ywas no adv yield in e 36).

D - 30

search Pro

20 @ 2000

84 kg ha‐1)

@ 100 ml

eld as influ

SCY kg/ha

1702

1738

1851

2100

192

n of ELO i

jectives tosutum. Thield paramvantage ofall three

oject on Co

0 g/ha + Flu

. Boll weig

/ha than o

uenced by Bathinda

BN/plant

22.7

23.9

22.8

28.7

3.5

n cotton

o study effe results meters amf ELO applie tested c

otton – An

usian 100

ght (3.1 g)

other treat

Z20 and Fl

BW (g) k

3.6

3.7

3.7

3.9

0.37 4

(Gossypiu

fect of diffindicated

mong the tication at centers (F

nual Repo

ml/ha (300

was signif

tments.

lusian Z20 Srigan

SCY kg/ha

BN

2784

3041

3006

2422

2562

2479

2368

471.02

um hirsutu

ferent levethat thertested treany of theFaridkot, B

ort (2016 –

06 kg/ha)

ficantly hig

(North Zonganagar

N/plant B

45.9

46.9

51.5

45.8

42.7

43.9

42.7

NS 0

um) as se

els of ELOre were neatments. e tested doBathinda

17)

and

gher

one)

BW (g)

3.1

3.1

3.1

2.8

3.0

3.0

2.8

0.25

eed

O on non‐ The oses and

Table 36

Trea

ELO @ 0

ELO @ 1

ELO @ 1

Control‐

Control

CD (p=0

Agrono

North Zo

The resparametliquid biyield of Central Plant heyield wiincreaseand 55thby sprayat Bansw@ 1.0 minfluencsignificaNanded

Table 37

T1.LBS6 25th dayAnkur 30

T2.LBS6 25th dayAnkur 30

T3.Cont

CD (p=0

ICAR

6: Effect of

tments

0.75 g

1.0 g

1.25 g

‐ Standard

.05)

omy X. Pai

one

sults indicters amonio stimulatested Bt h

Zone

eight, sympth sprayined by (7.7 h DAS. Playing of Biowara. At Sml/L on 2ced non‐sigant differe.

7:Effect of

Treat

@0.5ml/ ly and 55th028Bt

@ 1.0ml/ y and 55th028Bt

rol

.05)

R ‐ All India

f ELO on y

F

SCY kg/ha

2819

2697

2726

2846

2727

NS

id trial 3 E

cated thatng tested tnt (LBS6) hybrids at

podia, boll ng of Bio‐s%) over cont height, o‐stimulanturat, signif25th day angnificantly ences betw

bio‐stimu

tments

litre applieh day after

litre applih day after

a Coordina

ield attrib

Faridkot

BN/m2

108.3

106.4

118.4

121.7

111.6

NS

Effect of L

t there wtreatmentsapplicationFaridkot a

numbers,stimulant ontrol by aboll numbt LBS6 @ 1ficantly hignd 55th daby differe

ween all g

ulant LBS6

ed on sowing ‐

ied on sowing‐

D

ated Resea

utes and s

BW(g)

SCkg/

4.0 19

3.9 20

3.9 19

4.0 20

3.9 19

NS N

Liquid Bio

were non‐s. The resun at any ond Bathind

boll weighLBS6 @ 0applicationbers, and s1.0 ml/l of gher numbay after sent treatmgrowth an

on cotton

Faridko

3224

2745

3254

NS

D - 31

arch Projec

seed cotto

Bathi

CY /ha

BN/

958 22

048 23

967 22

033 24

905 21

NS N

ostimulan

‐ significaults clearlyof the testda (Table 3

ht and see.5 ml/l of n of liquid seed cottonwater at 2ber of bollsowing at

ments. Thend yield p

yield at d

t Bathind

2468

2469

2450

NS

ct on Cotto

n yield in N

nda

plant BW(g

2.0 3.7

3.5 3.8

2.8 3.7

4.2 3.8

1.0 3.6

NS NS

t on cotto

nt differey revealedted doses 37).

ed cotton ywater at bio stimuln yield we25 and 55 s were recSurat. Ho

e results inarameters

ifferent AI

da Akola

8 2866

9 2823

0 2660

on – Annu

North Zon

Wg)

SCY kg/ha

7 829

8 850

7 846

8 777

6 734

S NS

on growth

ences for that therfor improv

yield were Akola. Selant (LBS6)re recordedays aftercorded witowever, sendicated ts among t

ICRP locati

a Surat

6 1191

3 1475

0 1322

NS

al Report

e

Srigangan

BN/plan

28.8

26.7

25.9

26.5

26.2

NS

h and pro

all growte was no vement in

recorded eed cotton) @ 0.5 med significar sowing thth applicateed cottonhat there tested tre

ions

Nanded

2376

2411

2341

NS

(2016 – 17

nagar

nt BW (g

2.8

3.1

3.1

2.9

2.8

0.22

oduction

th and yiadvantagen seed cott

the highesn yield wal/ L ‐ 25tantly highehan controion of LBSn yield wawere nonatments a

Banswar

2376

2411

2341

NS

7)

g)

eld e of ton

st as h er ol 6 as n‐at

ra

Agron

Centr

The e

with t

conse

applie

yield w

[email protected] owith other

At NaApplic

Table

F1: 10

F2: 50

CD at

A1: Ab

A2: Ab

A3 Ab

CD at

M1: in

M2 : R

CD at

IC

nomy X:P

l

ral Zone

experiment

two levels

ervation pr

ed after ge

were foun

cation of ar seed cot5 kg/ha (2ined with ure conseicantly higother interaAbsorbents.

anded, thecation of S

e 38: Seed

00 % NPK

0 % NPK

5%

bsorbent ‐0

bsorbent ‐1

sorbent ‐2

5%

C) Moist

n‐ situ mois

Rainfed (Fla

5%

CAR ‐ All In

Paid trial 4

limited

t was cond

s of nutrie

ractices (in

ermination

d non‐sign

absorbent tton yield 2377 kg/ha Absorbenervation cgher seed action resut @25 kg/

e absorbenSuper abso

Cotton Yie

A) Fertil

B) Absorb

0 kg/ha

12.5 kg/ha

25.0 kg/ha

ture Conse

sture cons

atbed)

ndia Coord

4. Efficacy

ducted wit

ents (50 an

nsitu soil m

n of crop.

nificant at A

at differen(2548 kg/a) at [email protected] kombined cotton yieults reveale/ha (2554

nt found torbent @ 2

eld as influ

lizer levels

bent levels

a

ervation Te

ervation (

inated Res

y testing o

h three lev

nd 100 pe

moisture co

The result

Akola and

nt levels, f/ha) than t. Treatmekg/ha (25with Abseld (2827 ked that the4 kg/ha) r

o increase 5 kg/ha wa

uenced by

s

s

echniques

(BBF)

D - 32

search Pro

of Super a

vels super

rcent of r

onservation

ts revealed

Khandwa

found thatcontrol (2ent combi53 kg/ha) sorbent@2kg/ha) thae treatmenrecorded s

seed cottas at par w

super abs

A

oject on Co

absorben

absorben

ecommend

n and rainf

d that gro

(Table 38)

t Absorben239 kg/hanation of was at pa

25.5 kg/haan the restnt combinasignificantl

on yield swith its app

sorbent (U

Akola S

1875 2

1395 2

82

1636 2

1656 2

1612 2

NS

1685 2

1584 2

95

otton – An

nt (UPDT)

t (0,12.5 a

ded nutrie

fed contro

wth param

.

nt @25 kg/a) but wasinsitu soilar with coa, the lattt of the tration of rely higher

ignificantlyplication @

PDT) at di

Surat K

2525

2252

181

2239

2377

2548

221

2529

2248

215

nual Repo

trial‐ pro

and 25 kg/

ents) and t

l). Super a

meters and

/ha records at par w moiture mbinationter treatmreatment cecommendseed cotto

y superior @ 12.5 kg/h

fferent loc

Khandwa

878

1085

56

962

983

999

NS

826

1137

46

ort (2016 –

otocol of U

ha) combi

two moist

absorbent w

d seed cot

ded significith absorbconservat

n of insitu ent recorcombinatioded nutrieon yield t

over contha.

cations

Nande

2421

2658

211.

2451

2550

2617

161.

2504

2576

N.S.

17)

UPL

ned

ture

was

tton

cant bent tion soil ded ons. ents han

trol.

ed

1

8

9

1

0

7

4

4

6

.

PHY.1. Phy 1a: Centre:

differenand seedCCH 16‐conditio604, CPthe expeGISV 18conditiodrought39).

Table 3

NamePara

Relativecontent

Specific weight (

Specific (SLA)

SCMR

Canopy Temper

ChloropStability

Seed cot(Kg/ha)

ICAR

Exp1: Scr: Screenin

Lam, Gunt Amongst gt entries ind cotton y‐3, SIMA 5ons, whereD 1601 anerimental 5, RS 2835ons with tht tolerance

39: Summaconditi

e of the ameter

e water

leaf (SLW)

leaf Area

ature

phyll y Index

tton yield

R ‐ All India

eening ofng of G. hi

tur

genotypes n recordingield per pl5 and GISVeas the entnd ARBH 1results, it 5, L 604, CPheir inbuilte in additio

ary of theions during

Need

LK 861, SIMA 5,16‐1

CCH‐161601 CPRS 2835

CCH 16‐1601, Cand TCH

LK 861, L 1060, 1071

RB 611,1601, Aand RHC

AKH 130RS 2835SIMA 5

CPD 1602835, Gand GIS

a Coordina

Physi

f Cotton girsutum L.

tested forg number ant. The eV 310 recotries viz; L1601 recodis inferredPD 1601 a toleranceon to yield

e performg 2016‐17

d based irr

CPD 1602, GISV 310,

‐3, GJH 47PD 1601, S5

‐3, GJH 477CPD 1601, SH 1199

GJH 477, CRB 616, G

, CPD 1601AKH 1301, PC 1202

01, GJHV 55, TSH 327,

02, CPD 16GISV 185, CSV 310

D

ated Resea

ology an

genotypes. cotton g

r drought tof sympodentries Vizorded highL 1060, CPded higherd that the nd ARBH 1e to drough attributin

mance of e

rigated con

, L 604, CP, L 1060 an

7, L 1060, IMA 5, TCH

7, L 1060, SIMA 5, RS

CCH 16‐3, ISV 185 an

1, RHC 121PH 1071, C

518, RB 61, TCH 1199

601, TSH 32CCH 16‐3, S

D - 33

arch Projec

nd Bioch

s for abiogenotypes

tolerance, dia per pla; CPD 1602her seed cD 1602, CCr seed cottentries viz1601 have ht having mng characte

entries un

nditions

PD 1601, nd CCH‐

ARBH H 1199,

ABH S 2835

GISV 310, nd PH

7, ARBH CCH 16‐3

0, RB 611, 9 and

24, RS SIMA 5

ct on Cotto

hemistry

tic stress s for drou

significantnt, numbe2, CPD 160cotton yieCH 16‐3, Gton yield uz; L 1060, Cshown gomore thaners under

nder rainf

CPD 1602835, CC

GISV 31SIMA 5,1601

GISV 31CPD 160GJHV 51

GJH 477GISV 311

RB 611, CCH 16‐518 and

LK 861, SIMA 5,477

L 1060, GISV 18and ARB

on – Annu

y

toleranceught tolera

t variation er of bolls 01, TSH 32eld under GISV 310, under rainCPD 1602,ood perform two contrlow moist

fed and n

Rainfed

02, LK 861,CH‐16‐1,TS

10, LK 861, TSH 327,

10, CCH 16‐02, TSH 3218

7, SIMA 5, 10, L 1060,

SIMA 5, R‐3, AR 91‐0d GJH 477

RS 2835, L TCH 1199

CPD 1602,85, RS 2835BH 1601

al Report

e ance

was noticeper plant, 4, RS 2835need baseGISV 185, fed condit, CCH 16‐3mance undributing chure condit

need base

d condition

, SIMA 5, GSH 327 and

CCH 16‐3,RB 617 an

‐3, GJH 4777, CPD 160

RHC 1202,RB 617 an

RHC 1202, G08, TSH 324

L 604, GJHV9, TSH 327

, CCH 16‐35, L 604, CP

(2016 – 17

ed with thboll weigh5, GISV 185ed irrigateRS 2835, tions. From3, GISV 310der rain feharacters otions (Tabl

d irrigate

ns

GISV 310,Rd L 1060.

L 1060, d CPD

7, RB 617, 01 and

, CCH 16‐3nd CCH 16‐

GISV 310, 4, GJHV

V 518, and GJH

, GISV 310PD 1601

7)

e ht 5, d L m 0, d of e

d

S

, ‐

0,

Centr

Leaf rinteragenot(77.691071 condiRAH‐1lowesinterawas w

In genunderin raiNDLH62.35irrigat(DSI) ARBH

IC

re: UAS, Dh

relative waction. Metypes mea9) and CCH(69.75). Mtion. Amo1070 (24.5st was withaction effewith AKH‐1

neral plantr irrigated nfed than ‐2030‐2, R %), NDLHted compaand mean‐1651 wer

CAR ‐ All In

harwad

ater conteean RWC an highest H‐16‐3 (77Mean photoong the ge57) followh AKH‐130ect the high1301 (11.30

t morpholocondition irrigated RAH‐1070, H‐1938 (‐4ared to rain yield of re found to

ndia Coord

ent (RWC)was morRWC was

7.57) and tosynthetic notypes, s

wed by Sah01 (15.75) hest photo0) under ra

ogical parathan rainfcondition.RAH‐10714.83%) aninfed condgenotypeso be better

inated Res

differed re in irrigs with L‐1the lowestrate was ssignificantlhana (24.4followed osynthetic ainfed cond

ameters anfed wherea. The seve1 and BGDnd RB‐611 dition. Bass, five genr genotype

D - 34

search Pro

significantgated com1060 (84.7t RWC wassignificantly higher m41), RAH‐1by RB‐611rate was dition (Tab

nd total das, the meen genotypS‐1072 ha(‐43.99 %ed on bipotypes CPes than oth

oject on Co

tly for watmpared to71) followes in NDLH‐ly higher inmean phot1071 (22.81 (16.53) awith RAH‐ble 40).

ry matter ean seed copes viz., Ad on par y

%) showed lot analysiPD‐1652, Chers.

otton – An

ter regime rainfed ed by Sura‐2030‐2 (6n irrigated tosynthetic81) and Bnd CPD‐16‐1070 (28.6

per plant otton yieldAKH‐1301, yield.The gmaximumis for drouCPD‐1651,

nual Repo

es, genotypsituations.aj (78.90),8.87) folloconditionsc rate wasBGDS‐1072651 (16.7466) and th

was signifd was signCPD‐1652genotypes m yield redught susceRAH‐1071

ort (2016 –

pes and th. Among , NDLH‐ 2owed by Rs than rains recorded (22.44). 4). Among he lowest r

ficantly higificantly m2, NDLH‐20viz., L‐106duction unptibility in1, Sahana

17)

heir the 027 AH‐nfed d by The the rate

gher more 027, 60 (‐nder dex and

Ta

AK

RB

RB

CP

CP

AR

L‐1

PH

ND

ND

RA

RA

BG

CC

Su

ND

Sa

Me

W

G

W

No

able 40: Seed cott

Genotypes

KH‐1301

B‐610

B‐611

PD‐1651

PD‐1652

RBH‐1651

1060

H‐1071

DLH‐2027

DLH‐2030‐2

AH‐1070

AH‐1071

GDS‐1072

CH‐16‐3

raj (QC)

DLH‐1938

hana (LC)

ean

R

RXG

ote: ‐ WR‐ water

ton yield and yie

RWC (%) at

RF IR

71.62 73.9

71.17 74.6

73.90 77.3

75.87 78.0

67.76 77.6

77.45 74.9

76.66 92.7

74.83 73.6

76.74 78.6

68.17 69.5

75.86 77.9

67.21 72.2

77.27 75.8

76.12 79.0

75.68 82.1

75.89 77.0

73.92 78.2

75.06 76.1

S.Em± CD@5

0.043 0.26

0.187 0.53

0.260 0.73

regime; G‐ geno

eld components i

140 DAS

Mean

7 72.79

6 72.91

6 75.63

8 76.97

7 72.71

6 76.21

5 84.71

2 74.22

4 77.69

8 68.87

6 76.91

9 69.75

6 76.56

2 77.57

2 78.90

0 76.44

9 76.11

1

0.043 0.187 0.260

5%

6

3

3

types; IR‐Irrigate

IC

n cotton genotyp

Photosynthesis

RF

11.30 2

17.36 2

15.45 1

13.46 2

13.23 2

18.73 2

15.29 2

24.89 2

18.26 2

17.79 2

28.36 2

22.17 2

20.58 2

11.91 2

21.15 2

12.86 2

27.60 2

18.26 2

S. Em ± CD

0.241 1

0.886 2

1.239 3

ed; RF‐ Rainfed

D - 35

AR ‐ All India Coo

pes under differe

s (µmol m‐2 sec‐1)

IR MEAN

0.21 15.75

3.60 20.48

7.62 16.53

0.02 16.74

2.63 17.93

3.64 21.19

4.11 19.70

3.17 24.03

1.50 19.88

2.11 19.95

0.77 24.57

3.45 22.81

4.30 22.44

4.56 18.23

2.17 21.66

4.65 18.76

1.22 24.41

2.34 D@5%

1.47

2.50

3.50

ordinated Resear

ent water regime

) Seed cot

N RF

5 801.8

8 1108.0

3 1044.9

4 2284.8

3 2659.6

9 2284.5

0 473.3

3 1191.2

8 1313.1

5 1462.6

7 657.4

1 1753.1

4 1353.2

3 1418.4

6 1395.2

6 1797.0

1 2032.1

1472.4

S Em±

6.338

25.380

35.394

rch Project on Co

es

tton yield ( kg ha

IR ME

755.8 77

884.9 99

725.7 88

2406.7 234

2785.2 272

1839.2 206

291.5 38

940.0 106

1300.6 130

1426.8 144

638.9 64

1805.6 177

1204.6 127

1209.7 131

1203.7 129

1240.7 151

1731.5 188

1317.1

CD@5%

38.57

71.70

99.99

otton – Annual R

‐1)

EAN % Reduc

8.8 ‐6.08

6.5 ‐25.20

5.3 ‐43.99

45.8 5.066

22.4 4.507

61.8 ‐24.21

2.4 ‐62.35

65.6 ‐26.72

06.8 ‐0.96

44.7 ‐2.51

8.1 ‐2.89

79.3 2.906

78.9 ‐12.34

14.0 ‐17.25

99.5 ‐15.91

18.9 ‐44.83

81.8 ‐17.36

Report (2016 – 17

ction DSI

0 0.5158

08 2.1386

98 3.7328

6 ‐0.4298

7 ‐0.3823

12 2.0541

53 5.2900

24 2.2672

2 0.0817

2 0.2131

9 0.2459

6 ‐0.2465

42 1.0471

50 1.4635

12 1.3499

31 3.8034

60 1.4728

7)

Hisar

Genotprolin(RWCirrigatgenot1472 irrigatsignifiHowefor bowhereYSI anundergenotcondirainfegenot

1471 cottonRS 28prolin NAU,

formasignifishoweminimhigherainfebiomaTSH‐3weighcotton616, R Khand respe(61.78genot

IC

types (30)ne contentC) and spected condittype, respeshowed mted controicantly in ever, least oth the chaeas, yield snd CSI werer irrigated types H 1tions, resped conditiotypes.

Among H 1465, H n seed yie835 were ne content

Surat The phy

ation was icantly lowed the signmum days tr RWC in ed conditioass under r327. The ght in rainfen yield unRHC‐1217 a

dwa

The resct to Relat8) and RBtypes L‐10

CAR ‐ All In

) were scrt increasedcific leaf wion. The hectively, umaximum ol. The rmost of gdecline waaracters. Nstability ine observedcondition

1480 showpectively. on, except

the 30 ge 1472, H 1eld under rscreened and very l

ysiologicalsignificantwer days nificant lowto 50 % borainfed coon. Genotrainfed congenotypes ed conditioder water and Suraj.

ults of drotive WaterB‐610 (RW060(84.33

ndia Coord

reened, tod significanweight (SLWhighest annder rainfincrease

relative wgenotypes as observeNon‐significdex (YSI) ad for genotwas non‐

wed the hCotton set the H 14

enotypes s1491, H 147rainfed confor drougess reduct

parametetly deviatefor 50% west days oll formatioondition. Btypes TCHndition. ThRHH‐100

on. RHH‐1stress con

ought scree Content R

WC (61.33)mg/gm o

inated Res

o identify ntly in mosW) were fod lowest pfed conditin prolineater conteunder ra

ed in H 147cant differand chlorotypes H 14significanthighest coeed yield u464, H 14

screened fo78, H 1465ndition. Hght tolerantion RWC,

ers indicatd due to gsquaring for 50% floon. GenotyBiomass waH‐1777, RHhe highest 7, BGDS‐11007, RHHndition. Ha

ening genoRWC (64.67). The mof fresh le

D - 36

search Pro

tolerant st of genoound to deproline conion. The ge content ent and sinfed cond72, H 1481rence obseophyll stabi465, H 1478tly higher iotton seedunder irrig465, H 147

or drought5 and RS 2However, tnce becausSLW and c

ted that 50genotypesthan otheowering. Bypes GISV‐as significaHH‐1007 ano. of boll1072, TCH‐1015 andarvest inde

otypes fou7) followed

maximum Ceaves)) an

oject on Co

genotypesotypes, whecrease in ntent was genotypes under ra

specific leadition as c1, H 1478, erved for pility index 8, H 1472 ain some od yield ungated con72, H 1487

t tolerance835 genothe genotyse of highcotton seed

0% squari. CPD‐160ers. RHH‐1BGDS‐1063‐310, L‐799antly diffeand GJHV‐ls was reco‐1199 andd TCH‐1777ex was fou

nd that ged by TCH‐1Chlorophynd followe

otton – An

s under dereas, therainfed coobserved H 1481, Hinfed condaf weight compared H 1465 an

plant heigh(CSI) diffeand RS 283f the genonder bothdition diff7, H 1478

e, H 1480 ypes recorpes, H 146h degree id yield und

ng, 50% f2, RHH‐101015, TCH3, RHH‐1019 and RB‐6red in diff‐516 showorded in RHd RHH‐1017 were shund higher

enotypes T1199(63.22ll stabilityed by AR‐

nual Repo

rought coe relative wondition asin RB 610H 1478, RSdition as was founto irrigat

nd SIM CDht stability red signific35. Averagotypes thah irrigatedfered sign8, H 1300

followed rded signif65, H 1472ndices forder rainfed

lowering, 015 and RBH‐1199 and15 and AR‐611 showeferent genwed signifiHC‐1202, R15 showeowed the r in SURAT

TSH‐327 is 2), L‐1060 y was obs‐9108(81.6

ort (2016 –

onditions. Twater cont compared and AR 9S 2835 ancomparednd to dected conditRA genotyindex (PHcantly. Higge boll wen others. and rainificantly frand RS 2

by H 1481ficantly hig2, H 1478 r YSI, CSI d condition

and 50% B‐616 showd BGDS‐1‐9108 showd significanotypes uncantly higRHH‐1007 d higher highest s

T DWARF,

superior w(62.57), L‐served in 67) and R

17)

The tent d to 108 d H d to cline ion. ypes S1), gher ight The nfed rom 835

1, H gher and and n.

boll wed 063 wed ntly nder gher and boll eed RB‐

with 799 the

RHC‐

1202(80maximuand totafresh leaTSH‐327AR‐9108

itwas fo799 (17.performseed co(1772.78(1679.63327(1881199(17RB‐616 and yield

Table 41

Geno

RS‐2835

GSHV‐18

GISV‐310

GJHV‐518

CPD‐160

CPD‐160

ARBH‐16

TSH‐324

TSH‐327

L‐1060

L‐1384

L‐799

PH‐1071

AR‐9108

RB‐616

RB‐617

RB‐610

RB‐611

RHC‐120

RHC‐121

TCH‐1199

Mean

S Em ±

CD 5%

CV

ICAR

0.44) mg/gm total chal chlorophaves.). Am7(18.67 µ m8 (16.74) µ The photoound maxim.73µmol m

med by GSHotton yield8), AR‐9103 kg/ha) a85.67 Kg/h772.78 kg/(1679.63kd attribute

1:Average stability

types

85

0

8

1

2

601

2

7

9

R ‐ All India

m of freshlorophyll whyll contenong the gemoles / gmµ moles /gm

osynthesis mum (21.1m²s‐¹) and HV‐185(12.d found in08 (1735.5and GSHV‐ha) were f/ha),AR‐91g/ha) and es characte

relative wy and seed

Averagewater co

57

59

59

57

59

60

60

60

64

62

58

61

60

59

59

58

61

58

59

60

63

a Coordina

h leaves). Awas observnt in leaveenotypes tm tissue), fm tissue) .

activity of18) µmol mRHC‐1202.07 µmol mn genotyp56 kg/ha), R‐185 (1565found to b108(1735.5GSHV‐185

ers (Table 4

water conte cotton yiee relative ontent(%)

7.25

9.72

9.47

7.81

9.27

0.91

0.00

0.07

4.67

2.57

8.30

1.78

0.14

9.78

9.94

8.90

1.33

8.79

9.68

0.37

3.22

D

ated Resea

As far as cved in genoes was morthe maximfollowed b

f different m²s‐¹) whic2 (16.40 mm²s‐¹) .Whpe TSH‐32RHC‐1202 5.56 kg/habe better 56kg/ha),RC5(1565.56 41).

ent(%), Pheld of geno

Photos(µm

D - 37

arch Projec

hlorophyllotypes AR‐re in genoum prolineby TCH‐119

genotypesch was fol

m²s‐¹) and tile conside7 (1885.6(1689.44 ka). Out othan the CH‐1202(1kg/ha) on

hotosyntheotypes. synthesis ramol m2 s‐1)

15.11

12.07

13.33

15.14

14.35

16.07

15.33

15.20

18.33

14.33

15.67

17.73

14.07

21.18

13.00

14.26

10.82

14.12

16.40

14.73

13.20

14.97

0.44

1.26

8.84

ct on Cotto

accumula‐9108 (3.1otype AR‐9e content 99(18.0), R

s revealedlowed by the minimuering yield 7 kg/ha.) kg/ha),RHCof 21 genoother gen

1689.44kg/n the basis

esis rate (µ

ate Cmg

on – Annu

tion in lea0/g). The c108 (1.76/was obserRB‐610(17.

that in thTSH‐327 (um Photosas main pwhich at

C‐1217(168otypes testnotypes an/ha),RCH‐1s of screen

µmol m2 s‐1

hlorophyll sg/gm of fre

67.70

79.37

78.70

78.41

75.67

77.11

75.33

76.67

78.04

84.33

78.00

79.00

78.41

81.67

78.74

77.07

77.70

77.33

80.44

78.41

79.81

78.00

1.23

3.52

4.73

al Report

ves is concchlorophyl/g, and 3.1rved in the.96),L‐1060

he genotyp18.33 µmosynthesis aarameter par with88.89 kg/hted, Genond followe1217 (1688ning factor

1), Chlorop

stability sh leaves

0

7

0

1

7

1

3

7

4

3

0

0

1

7

4

7

0

3

4

1

1

0

(2016 – 17

cerned, thl content a10 mg/g) oe genotype0(17.0) an

pe AR‐9108ol m²s‐¹) ,Lactivity wathe highesh TCH‐119ha) , RB‐61otypes TSHed by TCH8.89kg/hars and yiel

phyll

SCY(kg./ha

1508

1566

1329

1112

1333

1308

1283

842

1886

762

863

988

1411

1736

1680

1323

1158

845

1689

1689

1773

1337

77

219

17

7)

e a, of es d

8, L‐as st 9 6 H‐H‐), d

a)

Phy 1 Centr salinithighe477 a617, R477. RH 12

Table

N

RB 61

RB 61

GJHv

GJHv

GJHv

RB 61

RHC 1

CPD 1

L 1384

RHC 1

Mean

SEm+

CD @

Hisar

A totaAveradifferyield genotpotasfollowsodiu

IC

1b: Screen

re: Lam, GBased o

ty levels, tst mean dand RHC 12RH 1217 an

Based o217 and GJ

e 42: EffectCotto

Name of th

10

11

518

477

310

17

1202

1601

4

1217

n

0.05

al of thirty age boll weed significfollowed btypes H 14sium to swed by H 1m ratio un

CAR ‐ All In

ning of co

untur on the dahe performdry matter217. Highend GJHV 47on the perfHV 477can

t of differeon entries u

e entry

genotypeeight, boll antly amoby H 1481465, H 147sodium rat1480 genonder salt st

ndia Coord

otton geno

ta collectemance of R productioest mean s77. Highesformance n be consid

ent salinityunder PotC

Cont

17.6

17.6

15.1

17.6

16.8

18.8

15.8

16.2

18.3

20.5

17.4

Varie

0.3

1.4

s were scrnumber png the gen, H 1470, 1, H 1480,tio. Amonotypes perfress condi

inated Res

otypes fo

ed on perRHC 1217, on at harvseed cottost mean haof the entdered as sa

y levels onCulture Co

trol

66

63

14

67

87

80

81

20

37

50

48

ety E

31

41

reened, to per plant anotypes. ThH 1480, R, SIM CDRAg the 30 formed thtion.

D - 38

search Pro

r salinity

rformance RHC 1202,est was reon yield waarvest inderies at lab aline tolera

n Seed Cottonditions

EC in m

4 EC

13.56

15.97

11.46

14.10

14.80

18.76

17.02

14.73

14.32

12.79

14.75

EC level

0.31

0.86

identify thnd cotton he genotypRS 2835 anA, GJHU 47genotypese best for

oject on Co

tolerance

of the en, RB 611 aecorded inas recordeex was recoand pot cant (Table

ton Yield p

mhos/cm

6 EC

9.30

11.70

6.30

10.91

9.60

11.29

10.58

11.20

10.45

10.42

10.24

In

he tolerantseed yieldpes H 1465nd AR 910877, GJHU 5s screenedhigher co

otton – An

e

ntries up tnd L 1384 the entryed in the orded in RBulture con42)

per plant (

C

0

0

0

1

0

9

8

0

5

2

4

nteration (v

t one unded under sa5 showed 8 under sa518 and AKd for droutton seed

nual Repo

to 25 daywas goody RB 617, entries ViB 611, RB 6nditions RB

g) of G.hir

8 EC

7.21

12.00

4.94

7.76

7.13

8.55

7.15

6.07

6.28

8.05

8.80

variety X E

0.52

1.44

er slat strelt stress cothe highesalt stress cKH 1301 shught tolerayield and

ort (2016 –

s at differ. SignificanRB 611, Gz; RB 611,610 and GB 611, RB 6

rsutum

Mean

11.93

14.33

9.46

12.61

12.10

14.35

12.64

12.05

12.36

12.94

C level)

ess conditioondition wst cotton scondition. howed higance, H 1potassium

17)

rent ntly, JHV , RB JHV 617,

n

3

3

1

0

5

4

5

6

4

ons. were eed The gher 465 m to

NAU, SU Genotyp‐ 3.8 to 4in physiSeed colowest wby RB‐61384 fohighest content content 324 follo(Saline significayield wasaline co

Phy.2:

Centre:

higher mentries, delayed sowing kg/ha focotton yindicatesuited fo Table 43Name of

entry

L1060

L 1384

Sivanandi

AKA 2004

AKA 7

Srinandi

Jaadu BG

Mean

SEm+

CD (0.05)

CV(%)

ICAR

URAT

pes (41) we4.8 d S/m,ological retton yield with r L‐1310, BGDS‐llowed by ratio was was founwas recorowed by CField, EC nt differeas recordedondition.

Preparingdevelopm

LAM, GUN

The genomean seedthe arborsowing, w(Table 43)ollowed byyield record that theor late sow

3: Performthe Nu

2/8/

36.8

33.7

31.4

31.8

34.5

37.1

II 39.0

39.0

Entri

0.7

2.1

R ‐ All India

ere screen EC of irrigesponses awas recor84 under s‐1072 and GSB‐43 anfound in Gnd in BGDSrded by SuCPD‐1602 of Saline nce in phyd by RHH‐

g for climment, yiel

NTUR

otypes pland cotton yireum entrwhereas th). The enty L 1384 (1rded by hire arboreumwing.

mance of cumber of bo

/16 28/8

89 25.

78 24.

44 22.

89 28.

56 33.

11 34.

01 37.

01 37.

ies Datesow

5 0.4

8 1.1

15.6

a Coordina

ned for sagation wateand seed crded by RHsaline condRHH‐1007nd CPD‐16GISV‐310 GS‐1063 foluraj followand L‐799soil ‐ 4.2ysiological1007 follow

ate changld and fib

nted undeld was reries and Jahe hirsutury Jaadu B1940 kg/harsutum entm are well

cotton genolls per plant

8/16 Me

25 31.

52 29.

89 27.

55 30.

51 34.

81 35.

84 38.

84

e of wing

EX

40 1.0

16 3.6

69

D

ated Resea

aline toleraer: 8.0 dS/cotton yieldHH‐1007 fodition. Sod7wheras p601 beforeGJHV‐477 alowed by

wed by BGD9. The field to 5.6 d responsewed by RH

ge: Effect re develo

der changecorded unaadu BGIIm entries BGII recoda), L 1060 tries were suited for

notypes un

ean 2/8/1

07 4.23

15 4.15

17 3.99

22 2.16

03 2.34

96 2.20

43 4.51

3.37

XD Entrie

06 0.043

67 0.124

D - 39

arch Projec

ance by usi/m). The red were obollowed byium contepotassium e floweringand L‐1384GJHV‐516 DS‐1072. Kd experimeS/m, EC os and seeHH‐1015 ho

of enviroopment

ging climatnder norm did not srecorded ed signific(1902 kg/hon par wir late sow

nder differBoll weig

16 28/8/

3 4.01

5 3.85

9 3.79

6 2.19

4 2.18

0 2.21

1 4.51

7 3.25

es Date sowi

3 0.02

4 0.06

4.15

ct on Cotto

ing micro pesults showbserved amy TCH‐1199ent was foucontent wg. Results o4. At floweand RHH‐K/Na ratioent screenof irrigatiod cotton yowever it w

onment o

tic conditiomal sowing show any significancantly highha) and Sivth one ano

wing. Amon

ent dates ght (g)

/16 Mea

1 4.12

5 4.00

9 3.89

9 2.18

8 2.27

1 2.2

1 4.5

5

of ng

EXD

23 0.06

66 NS

5

on – Annu

plot technwed that smongst gen9 and TSHund more iwas recordof K/Na raering stage‐1007 whi was founning for saon water: yield. The was the lo

n crop ph

ons revealthan delaydifferenctly lower her mean vanandi (1other. Thngst Bt gen

of sowing See

an 2/8/16

2 2020

0 2148

9 1971

8 1354

7 1415

1 1450

1 2432

1827

D Entries

60 29

S 85

al Report

ique (EC osignificant notypes. T‐327 whilein AKH‐130ded the higatio revealee, the highle highestd the highlinity with10.6 dS/mhighest s

owest in L‐1

henology,

led that, sy sowing. e under nyields undseed cotto808 kg/hahe experimnotypes Ja

at Lam ed cotton yie

6 28/8/1

1784

1733

1646

1323

1412

1380

2412

1669

s Date osowin

16

45

14.08

(2016 – 17

f Saline sodifferenceThe highese it was th01 followeghest by Led that thhest sodium potassiumhest in TSH genotypem) showeeed cotto1384 unde

significantlAmong thnormal ander delayeon of 242). The see

ment resultaadu BGII i

eld(kg/ha)

16 Mean

4 1902

3 1940

6 1808

3 1338

2 1413

0 1415

2 2421

9

of ng

EXD

41

142

8

7)

oil es st e d L‐e m m H‐es d n er

y e d d 1 d ts is

n

2

0

8

8

3

5

1

UAS,

The eper hekg/hagenot(2037kg/hafollow(2493kg/ha385 (6of Jun(Table

Table

V1.Sa

V2 AR

V3 AR

V4 DL

V5 Gh

V6 DA

V7 AR

V8 Fir

V9 AT

Mean

Param

CD @

NAU, The rethat tboll fofloweThe ssowindue tofor eanot vhighe

IC

Dharwad

experimentectare shoa) with firstypes, irres7 kg/ha) foa) and ARBwed by Gh3 kg/ha) foa) with firs669 kg/ha)ne to first e 44).

e 44: Effect

Treat

hana (G. h

RBH‐813 (G

RBC‐19 (G.h

LSA‐17 (G.

ham‐34 (G.

AS‐385 (G.

RBAS‐131 (

rstclass BG

TM BG‐II (B

n

meters

5 %

SURAT

esults on dthere was ormation (ering and bignificant ng as compo date of sarly sown aried signr for G. Co

CAR ‐ All In

t was condowed signifst sowing spective ofllowed by BH‐813 (18am‐34 (11ollowed byt sowing () and DLSAfortnight

t of date of

tments

hirsutum),

G. hirsutum

hirsutum

arboreum

. hirsutum)

arborium)

G. arboriu

G‐II (Bt)

Bt)

dates of sosignificant(DAS 85) dboll formatreduction pare to easowing whcondition ificantly bot. Hy‐12 B

ndia Coord

ducted witficant redu(D1) and f date of sATM‐BG I56 kg/ha).174 kg/ha)y First clas(D1). WherA‐17 (701 kof July (15

f sowing o

m),

)

),

),

um),

owing witht differencdue to dation in late was obserrly sowinghile numbecomparedy genotypBGII at 50D

inated Res

th three timuction withthe least ysowing maI (1989 kg/. Whereas,.Among thss (2411 kreas, leastkg/ha) with5 days inte

on yield an

D1– 11.6

249

214

1849

1770

1480

1210

194

241

2378

1964

Variet

86

genotypece at 50% tes of sowsown conrved in biog at all theer of bolls d to normapes at critiDAS and 11

D - 40

search Pro

mes of sowh delay in syield (110ximum yie/ha), then , least yielhe interactkg/ha), ATMt yield wash last sowerval) resu

nd yield co

6.2016

3

3

9

0

0

0

2

2

8

4

ties

s revealedsquaring (

wing. Less ndition comomass ande stages. Dand seed cal, delayedical growth10DAS wh

oject on Co

wing and nsowing from02 kg/ha) weld was recfollowed d was withtion effect M‐BG II (2s in Gham‐ing (D3).Dulted in sig

mponents

D2 ‐ 27.6

193

194

169

131

141

780

148

210

196

162

Dates of

148

d that soil m(DAS 45), number ofmpared to ed leaf weigDifference cotton yied sown conh periods.ich was at

otton – An

nine genotm D1 to D3with last scorded witby hirsutuh arboreumSahana re

2377 kg/ha‐34 (627 kelay in sowgnificant yi

s in cotton

6.2016

31

45

90

16

16

0

88

08

64

26

sowing

8

moisture a50% flowef days requearly and nght in normin boll weld were fondition.Soi Biomass t par with

nual Repo

types. Seed3, maximusowing (D3th Bt hybrmvariety, m, DAS‐38ecorded ma) and ARBkg/ha) following from ield reduct

genotype

D3‐ 12.7

1340

1482

1022

701

627

669

853

1593

1628

1102

V X D

257

at critical stering (DASuired for 5normal datmal sowingight was nound signifil moisturewas foundDeviraj on

ort (2016 –

d cotton ym yield (13).Among ids, First cSahana (185 (886 kg/maximum yBH‐813 (2owed by Dfirst fortntion in cot

s

7.16 Me

0 19

2 18

2 15

12

11

88

14

20

8 19

2 15

D

tages show 65) and 550% squartes of sowg and delanot significficantly hige content d significanly at 110D

17)

yield 964 the lass 921 /ha) yield 143 DAS‐ight tton

ean

921

857

520

262

174

86

428

038

990

564

wed 50% ring, wing. yed cant gher had ntly DAS.

Leaf weat 110Dwas signdates anInteract50% bol50DAS acotton y

Khandw

GenotypD1(Normof sowinsignificaseed cotother sixdate of skg/ha) y

significatreatmethan othconcernwhich w(2.84 mgin treatmother tre

Leaf watwhich wtreatmegenotypthe treasuperiorLeaf wastatisticaD1G1.

ICAR

ight was siAS. Boll wnificantly hnd genotypion of sowll developmand 110DAyield had sh

wa

The experpes. The mal sowingng D2 and ntly supertton yield x genotypesowing anyield.

The first dntly higheents G1 gavher genotyed, the tr

was significg/g of fresment D3Geatments a

The interater potent

was significents G1 gapes. As far atment D1r to all theater potenally D1G7

R ‐ All India

ignificantlyweight was high for Depes for soiwing dates ment. TheAS as well howed sig

riment waresults reg) recordedD3. The lorior over e(1493 kg/hes. The lowd different

date of sower than ove (2.77 mypes. As fareatment cantly supesh leaves). 5. In case and at par

action effetial of cottantly highave (9.57 ‐as interac

1G7 gave te other trential (20.1was found

a Coordina

y high for Gsignificant

eviraj whichl moistureand geno

e interactioas boll wenificant int

as conductevealed thd consisteowest yieldeach otheha) over owest yield wt genotype

wing (D1) gother datmg/g of frear as interD1G2 gaveerior to alThe lowesof interac with D1G

ect of dateon. The firer than ot‐ bar) Leaction effecthe higheseatments a17 ‐ bar) d significan

D

ated Resea

G. Cot. Hy‐tly higher h was at pe showed ntypes wason betweeeight was teraction f

ted with that amongntly highed (556kg/hr. The genther genotwas recordes was con

gave (2.74es of sowesh leaves)action effee the highl the othest total Chction statis1 and D1G

e of sowingrst date ofher dates f water pct of date ost (7.13 –and it waswas reco

ntly superio

D - 41

arch Projec

‐12 BGII atfor G. COTpar for G. Cnon‐signific significanen sowing not signiffor sowing

three Dateg the diffst seed coa) was recnotype G1types. Howded by G3 cerned, th

4 mg/g of fwing. Sim) total Chlect of datehest (2.86 er treatmehlorophyll (stically D1G3 (Table 4

g and diffef sowing (Dof sowing.otential wof sowing bar) Leaf closely foorded in tor over oth

ct on Cotto

t 50DAS wT. Hy‐12 BGCOT. Hy‐12cant differt for days dates andficant. Leafdates and

es of sowiferent dattton yield corded und1(Rasi‐659 wever, oth(755 kg/hahe treatme

fresh leavemilarly, amorophyll we of sowinmg/g of nts and it (2.49 mg/gG2 was fo5).

erent genoD1) gave (8. Similarly which was and differwater po

ollowed bytreatment her treatm

on – Annu

hereas it wGII. Seed c2 BGII.The ence at allto 50 % f

d genotypef weight, n genotype

ing super tes of so(1815 kg /der D3. All Bt.) had rer genotypa). As far aent D1G1ga

es) total Cmong the which was ng and difffresh leavwas closeg of fresh ound signif

otypes mar8.39 ‐ bar)among thesignificantrent genototential why D1G5 (7.D3G6.In

ments and a

al Report

was highercotton yielinteractionl phenologlowering aes for Planno. of bolls.

imposed wing the /ha) over othe treatmrecorded tpes were os interactioave the hig

hlorophyll different significantferent genves) total Cely followeleaves) waficantly su

rkedly infl Leaf watee differenttly superiotypes was hich was s29 ‐ bar). case of iat par with

(2016 – 17

r for Devirad per plann of sowingical stagesand days tnt height als and see

with sevetreatmen

other datements werthe higheson par witon effect oghest (242

which wagenotype

tly superiootypes waChlorophyed by D1Gas recordeperior ove

uenced ther potentiat genotypeor to otheconcernedsignificantlThe lowesinteractionh D1G5 an

7)

aj nt g s. o at d

n nt es re st h of 2

as es or as yll 1 d er

e al es er d, ly st n, d

Table

Dates

D1.No

D2. Ddays(

D3. Ddays(2

CD (P

Sub tr

G1:

G2:

G3:

G4:

G5: (arbo

G6:

G7:

Intera

CD @

IC

e 45: EffectLWP a

Treatme

s of Sowing

ormal (26.6

elayed 15 10.7.16)

elayed 30 25.07.2016

=0.05)

reat.

Rasi‐659 B

JK‐4 (hirsu

Vikrum (h

JK‐5 (hirsu

Jawar Tapreum)

AKA‐8 (a

JLA‐505 (a

CD (0.0

action (DX

D1G1

D1G2

D1G3

D1G4

D1G5

D1G6

D1G7

D2G1

D2G2

D2G3

D2G4

D2G5

D2G6

D2G7

D3G1

D3G2

D3G3

D3G4

D3G5

D3G6

D3G7

5 %

CAR ‐ All In

t of enviroand soil m

ent

g

6.16)

6)

BG‐II Bt.

utum)

irsutum)

utum)

pti

rboreum)

arboreum)

05)

G)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

ndia Coord

nment andoisture.

SCY(Kg

181

102

55

15

149

88

75

137

108

109

) 122

744

242

140

968

216

176

190

208

128

77

874

123

101

90

109

774

48

42

74

47

48

50

314

inated Res

d different

g/ha)

15

26

6

7

93

6

5

79

87

98

27

4

22

00

8

62

69

00

81

84

1

4

36

14

6

97

4

7

2

1

7

7

2

4

D - 42

search Pro

t genotype

Total Chlomg/g m o

leav

2.74

2.67

2.57

0.08

2.77

2.73

2.64

2.60

2.58

2.59

2.72

0.22

2.84

2.86

2.75

2.60

2.60

2.57

2.92

2.74

2.74

2.62

2.68

2.64

2.66

2.63

2.72

2.6

2.56

2.5

2.49

2.54

2.59

0.1

oject on Co

es on Seed

orophyll of fresh es

4

7

7

8

7

3

4

0

8

9

2

2

4

6

5

0

0

7

2

4

4

2

8

4

6

3

2

1

6

1

9

4

9

1

otton – An

d Cotton Yi

Leaf wpoten

ba

8.

8.

16

0.

9.

11

10

10

10

12

11

2.

7.

8.

8.

8.

7.

10

7.

9.

9.

6.

9.

8.

8.

8.

11

16

17

14

14

20

18

1.

nual Repo

ield total c

water ntial (‐ar)

39

46

6.10

55

57

1.52

0.79

0.72

0.12

2.72

1.43

95

87

87

74

83

29

0.00

13

17

70

40

00

40

00

53

1.67

6.00

7.23

4.33

4.67

0.17

8.63

77

ort (2016 –

chlorophyl

Soil moisturcontent

18.93

24.89

23.06

0.67

26.98

19.88

21.25

21.12

20.46

25.29

21.07

7.75

27.78

11.46

15.68

15.50

15.56

24.09

22.44

32.27

27.46

21.37

23.07

23.09

25.30

21.69

20.88

20.72

26.70

24.80

22.73

26.49

19.09

3.28

17)

ll,

re %

Hisar

123, HDsowing 5

genotyppar for tper planwith HDMinimufor daystaken byweight ayielded for days46).

genotypMore nugenotypflowerinThe highearly sowsown co

day to ffor the ddegree (HYTU) genotypwere thhighest late sowopeninggenotypconditio

ICAR

Three hirsD 324 and H5/5/2016 a The resultpes for mosthe days tnt and cotD 123 genm time was to boll oy genotypand cottohigher at ls to boll op

The resultpes 1226 aumber of pe, whereang and leashest boll nwn conditiondition an Growing dflowering pday to flowdays (GDDfor boll o

pe. Normale highest GDD, HTUwn conditig stage of pe HD 324 on.

R ‐ All India

sutum genoHD 432) wand Late so

ts on Desst of the cto flowerinton seed ynotype. Tas taken bypening it tes under ln seed yielate sown pening con

ts on hirsund 1098i sbolls, seedas, H 1098st boll opeumbers peion. The gend higher y

degree dayphenologicwering wasD), Helio topening pl sown conunder earU and PTU on for theplant wer had the h

a Coordina

otypes (H ere planteowing 27/5

si cotton sharacters. ng and dayyield per pThe highesy genotypetook maximlate sown eld per placondition tributed to

utum cottoshowed eads per bol8i had then durationer plant, avenotype H yield may b

ys (GDD), Pcal stage ws also the hhermal unhenologicandition hadly and lateunder noe day to fre the highhighest HY

D

ated Resea

1098 i, H 1ed in three 5/2016) un

showed s The genoys to boll plant werest averagees for daysmum duraconditionant were odue to higowards hig

on with rerliness in rll and seede highest n under earverage bol 1300 had be attribut

Photo therwere the hhighest in Hnit (HTU), al stage id the highee sown conrmal sownflowering hest undeYTU for bo

D - 43

arch Projec

1226, H 13dates of snder irrigat

ignificant otypes HD opening de observed boll weigs to floweration. The . The highobserved gher boll ngher avera

espect to respect to d cotton yaverage brly and latel weight athe higheed by both

rmal unit (highest in HH 1098i buPhoto then Americaest value fondition resn conditionphenologir early sowoll opening

ct on Cotto

300) and thsowing (Eated condit

difference123 was fouration. Sd for HD 4ght was oing under least durahest boll nunder lateumber perge boll we

different flowering

yield per pboll weighe sown connd cotton st cotton sh boll num

(PTU) and H 1098i unt at the eaermal unit an cotton or GDD anspectively.n, whereasical stage.wn conditg phenolog

on – Annu

hree arborrly sowingion.

es betweeound earlieignificantly432 genotyobserved iearly sownation for dnumber pee sown cor plant, Hoeight in HD

dates of sand boll o

plant weret. The gendition, reseed yieldseed yield ber and w

Hydro thender late sarly sown p(PTU) andwere the

nd PTU, wh The genos, HYTU w GDD, HTtion in HDgical stage

al Report

reum genog 26/04/20

en sowing er and HD y higher bype which n HD 324n conditionays to boler plant, aondition. Towever, lonD 324 geno

sowing revopening, ree observedenotypes espectivelyd was obseper plant ueight.

ermal unit sown condperiod. d Hydro the highest hereas HTUotype HD 3was the higTU and PT 324 genoe under no

(2016 – 17

otypes (, HD016, Norma

times an432 was a

boll numbewas at pa

4 genotypen, whereasl open waverage boThe HD 43ng duratiotype (Tabl

vealed thaespectivelyd in H 130had earliey (Table 52erved undeunder earl

(HYTU) fodition. HTUGrowing hermal unin H 130U and HYTU324 had thghest undeTU for bootype. Thormal sow

7)

D al

d at er ar e. s, as oll 2 n e

at y. 0 er ). er y

or U

it 0 U e er oll e n

Table

Days t

HD 12

HD 32

HD 43

Mean

CD at

Cotto

HD 12

HD 32

HD 43

Mean

CD at

Hirsu

Days t

H 109

H 122

H 130

Mean

CD at

Cotto

H 109

H 122

H 130

Mean

CD at

Junag

devel

May 2

(2). G

variet

sown arborfor G.requir

IC

e 46: Effect

Desi Var

to flowerin

23

24

32

n

5 %

n seed yie

23

24

32

n

5 %

utum varie

to flowerin

98 i

26

00

n

5 %

n seed yie

98 i

26

00

n

5 %

garh

A field

opment, y

2016, D2=

G.Cot.Hy‐12

ties I.e. (5)

Flowericrop req

reum group. hirsutumrement to

CAR ‐ All In

t of differe

rieties

ng

ld/Plant

eties

ng

ld/Plant

experimen

yield and f

20th Jun 20

2 (3) G.Co

G.Cot.‐19

ng patternuired morp as comp group. Inproduced

ndia Coord

ent sowing

Fa

Fa

Early

Fa

Fa

nt was con

fiber devel

016 and D

ot.Hy‐10 a

(6) G.Cot.

n was affecre heat unare to G. h normal a different

inated Res

g time on s

Early

65.77

74.4

67.27

69.14

actor (V)

1.26

80.94

46.18

67.38

64.83

actor (V)

10.43

y

56.37

55.47

58.7

56.84

actor (V)

1.43

83.61

63.2

115.36

87.39

actor (V)

16.54

nducted to

lopment, t

3=10th July

and one B

MDH‐11 (7

cted by henit to prohirsutum gnd late sophonologi

D - 44

search Pro

seed yield

Sow

No

7

76

77

Fact

1

59

55

71

62

Fact

10

Norma

59

58

5

5

Fact

1

6

6

92

73

Fact

16

o study the

three sowi

y 2016 wit

Bt hybrid

7) G.Cot.‐1

eat unit recoduced 1st

roup. In caown crop, tical stages

oject on Co

and its ch

wing time (T

ormal

76.7

78

6.63

7.11

tor (T)

1.26

9.85

5.16

1.24

2.08

tor (T)

0.43

al

9.73

8.67

58.9

59.1

tor (T)

1.43

66.9

61.8

2.61

3.77

tor (T)

6.54

e effect of

ing dates w

h three No

(4) G.Cot.

15 .

ceived dursquare, 1

ase of bollthere was . Partition

otton – An

haracters (D

T)

L

6

7

7

7

Facto

2

90

78

9

8

Facto

Late

69

6

6

6

Facto

2

4

6

5

5

Facto

f environm

with 20 da

on Bt hybr

Hy‐8 BG‐I

ring the cro1st bloom opening mno majoring percen

nual Repo

Desi &hirs

Late

64.7

7.23

7.97

73.3

or (V x T)

2.17

0.27

8.24

5.07

7.86

or (V x T)

NS

9.97

62.7

64.5

5.72

or (V x T)

2.47

1.88

1.27

52.6

1.92

or (V x T)

NS

ment on cro

ays’ interv

ids i.e. (1)

I with thr

op growthand 50%

more heat differencentage of bi

ort (2016 –

sutum)

Mea

69.0

76.5

73.9

77.0

59.8

77.9

Mean

62.0

58.9

60.7

64.1

62.0

86.8

op phenol

val i.e D1=3

V1= GTHH

ree arbore

h period. Ebloom inunit requie in heat uiomass at

17)

an

06

54

96

02

86

9

02

94

7

13

09

86

ogy

30th

H‐49

eum

arly n G. ired unit 120

and 150matter pwas probiomasscomparehirsutum

cotton y

two gro

(1880 kg

Cot. Hy.

(1411 kg

(2483 kg

as comp

had effe

affected

Table 47

V1=GTH

V2=G.Co

V3=G.co

V4=G.co

V5= G.C

V6=G.Co

V7=G.Co

Phy 3. Ehighden LAM, Gu

T

applicat

(Recomm

DAS), T6

N,P, K +

The yiel

ICAR

0 days aftepartitioninduced higs as compe to G. hirsm group. Early sown

yield than

ups; in G.h

g/ha) and i

‐10(1658 k

g/ha, V7)

g/ha) was

pare to ear

ect on the l

d by enviro

7: Preparinof enviro

Treatme

HH‐49 (hirs

ot.Hy‐12(h

ot.Hy‐10(hi

ot.Hy‐8 BG

ot.19 (arbo

ot.MDH‐11

ot.15(arbo

Mea

ANOV

CD @5

Effect of Nnsity plan

untur

The highes

ion of Zn

mended N

6‐ (Recomm

Foliar app

d improve

R ‐ All India

r sowing inng towardsher in earlpare to G.sutum gro

n (1851 kg

late (1176

hirsutum g

it was at p

kg/ha, V3)

and G.Cot

produced

rly (D2=30

lint index,

onment wh

ng for Climonment(da

ents

utum)

irsutum)

irsutum)

II (hirsutu

oreum)

1(arboreum

reum)

n

VA

5%

Nano Zincnting

st seed c

nSO4 @ 0

,P,K + Foli

mended N

plication of

ement ran

a Coordina

ndicated ts boll devey and norm hirsutumup due to

g/ha) and t

6 kg/ha) so

roup, G.Co

par with GT

as compa

t MDS‐11(

by variety

0th May) an

But not in

hereas vari

mate Changates of sow

D1

m)

m)

c and Nan

cotton yie

0. 2% at

ar applicat

,P,K + Soil

f Nano Zin

ged from

D

ated Resea

hat early (elopment, mal sown

m group, bthat seed

timely (18

own crop.

ot.hy.‐8 Bt

THH‐49(18

red to G. a

1396 kg/h

G.Cot. hy‐

nd late(D3

case with

etal differe

ge: Seed cowing)

1 (30.05.20

1942

1884

2050

1916

1554

1811

1803

1851

Dates

157

no‐P on gr

ld was re

45DAS &

tion of Na

l applicatio

c @ 2 g pe

10 to 15

D - 45

arch Projec

(D1) and naltimetry crop. In cabut less pcotton yie

34 kg/ha)

Varietal di

(V4) gave

842 kg/ha,

arboreum

ha, V6). Sig

‐8 BG‐II wh

=10th July)

seed inde

ences were

otton of di

016) D2

rowth and

ecorded w

60 DAS)

no Zinc @

on of Zn S

er 15 litres

percent an

ct on Cotto

ormal sowits effectase of G. aartitioningeld was sig

sown crop

ifferences

the signif

V1), G. Co

group G.co

gnificantly

hich was ti

) sown cro

ex and boll

e found sig

ifferent va

(20.06.201

1855

1798

1871

2483

1775

1325

1733

1834

Varieties

744

d Product

with T7‐ (R

and it w

2 g per 10

SO4 @ 25

s of water

nd the see

on – Annu

wn (D2) croon yield arboreum gg toward gnificantly

p gave sign

also found

icantly hig

ot Hy‐12(16

ot‐15(1489

y the highe

imely sown

op (Table 4

weight. O

gnificant.

arieties as

16) D3 (

tivity of C

Recommen

was on pa

0 litres of

kg/ha) and

at 45DAS &

ed cotton

al Report

ops get maand seed cgroup prodboll devellow as com

nificantly h

d significan

her seed c

668 kg/ha,

9 kg/haV7)

est seed c

n crop (D2

47). Enviro

il percenta

influenced

(10.07.201

1728

1323

1053

1240

904

1053

932

1176

D X V

314

otton und

nded N,P,

ar with T8

water at 4

d T9‐ (Reco

& 60 DAS)

yield was

(2016 – 17

aximum drcotton yielduced moropment ampare to G

higher see

nt betwee

cotton yiel

V2) and G

), G.Cot.‐1

cotton yiel

2=20th June

nment als

age was no

d by effect

16) Mean

1842

1668

1658

1880

1411

1396

1489

1621

der

,K + Folia

8 treatmen

45DAS & 6

ommende

(Table 47

associate

7)

ry d re as G.

d

n

d

G.

9

d

e)

o

ot

t

n

2

8

8

0

1

6

9

1

ar

nt

0

d

).

d

with

weigh

of wa

Table

T1.Re

T2.Re

T3.T1@2%

T4.T12g pe60

T5.T12g pe60 DA

T6.T225 kg/

T7.T20. 2%

T8.T2@ 2 g& 60 D

T9.T2@ 2 g& 60 D

CD (0

Dharw

Maximby (Trecom(4.64)yield becauZn (T8than chave a

IC

higher nu

ht.The folia

ter at 45D

e 48: Effect

Tr

ec NK

ec NPK

+ Foliar apat 45DAS &

+Foliar apr 10 litres

+Foliar apr 15 litres AS

+ Soil app/ha

+ Foliar apat 45DAS

+ Foliar apg per 10 litrDAS

+ Foliar apg per 15 litrDAS

.05)

wad

mum photT8) i.e., recmmended N) with (T8)and yield use of nativ

8 and T9) ncontrol (T1any effect

CAR ‐ All In

mber of s

ar applicat

AS & 60) o

t of Nano

reatment

pplication & 60

pplication oof water a

plication oof water a

plication of

pplication & 60 DAS

pplication res of wate

pplication res of wate

osyntheticcommendeNK+nano‐P rec. NPK+componenve P sourcnor soil app

1 and T2).Ton yield im

ndia Coord

sympodia

ion of pho

observed s

fertilizer o

of KH2PO4

of Nano P @t 45DAS &

of Nano P @t 45DAS &

f Zn SO4 @

of ZnSO4 @

of Nano Zier at 45DA

of Nano Zier at 45DA

c rate (29.4ed NPK+naP (2g 10 lit+nano‐Zn nts betweees. So alsoplication oThe results mproveme

inated Res

per plant,

osphorous

ignificant i

on Seed Co

PlaHeig(cm

12

12

4 13

@ &

13

@ &

12

@ 13

@ 13

inc AS

12

inc AS

12

NS

44) and stoano‐Zn (2gtre‐1) spray(2g 10 litren with ano neither foof ZnSO4 (Tconcluded

ent in Suraj

D - 46

search Pro

, higher n

T5(T1+Fol

improveme

otton Yield

nt ght m)

sym

7

5

6

5

0

2

7

7

7

S

omatal cong 10 litre‐

y (28.28). Tre‐1) spraynd withoutoliar supplT6) could red that foliaj cotton va

oject on Co

number of

iar applica

ent in seed

d of Cotton

No. of mpodia perplant

17.28

17.04

18.88

14.80

13.20

14.72

17.44

15.04

14.16

2.66

nductance‐1) spray wTranspiratio. There wt p fertilizeementatioecord the ar applicatariety (Tabl

otton – An

f bolls per

ation of Na

d cotton yi

n

r No.

bolls sq.m

70.6

76.3

80.3

73.6

81.6

86.6

90.0

86.3

84.3

4.7

(0.348) atwhich wason rate at ere no sigers (T1 and on of nanohigher yieltion of nanle 49).

nual Repo

r plant an

ano P @ 2g

ield (Table

of per m

Bow(g

67 3.3

33 3.2

33 3.3

67 3.2

67 3.3

67 3.4

00 3.4

33 3.4

33 3.4

74 N

t 100 DAS s on par w100 DAS wgnificant dT2) treatm‐P (T3 and ld and yielno‐P or na

ort (2016 –

d higher

g per 15 lit

48).

oll wt g)

SCY(Kg/h

36 172

25 179

38 176

27 177

30 180

40 192

40 201

49 190

46 189

S 77.

was recorwith (T3) was maximifferences ments possT4) and nald parametno‐Zn did

17)

boll

tres

Y ha)

20

94

69

70

03

20

15

04

92

.9

ded i.e.,

mum for

sibly ano‐ters not

Table 49

T1.Rec N

T2.Rec N

T1+Foliaper 10 li

T1 +Foliaper 15 li

T1 + Folat 45DA

T2 + Soikg/ha

T2 + Fol2% at 45

T2 + Fol2 g per 1DAS

T2 + Fol2 g per 1DAS

CD

Srigang

The seed

applicat

in Table

with T6(T

of Nano

Table 50

T1.Reco

T2.Reco

T3.T1+Foliters of

T4.T1 + F

T5.T2 + S

T6.T2 + F& 60 DA

T7.T2 + Fliters of

CD at 5 %

ICAR

9:Effect of

Trea

NK

NPK

ar applicatiiters of wa

ar applicatiters of wa

iar applicaAS & 60

l applicatio

iar applica5DAS & 60

iar applica10 liters of

iar applica15 liters of

ganagar

d cotton y

ion of Nan

e 49 reveal

T2 + Foliar

P @ 0.13

0: Effect of

mmended

mmended

oliar applicwater at 4

Foliar appl

Soil applica

Foliar applAS

Foliar applwater at 4

%

R ‐ All India

Nano‐Zn a

atment

ion of Nanter at 45D

tion of Nanter at 45D

tion of KH

on of Zn SO

tion of ZnS DAS

tion of Naf water at 4

tion of Naf water at 4

yield and b

no Zinc @

led that hi

applicatio

g per 15 lit

f Nano‐Zn

Treatm

d dose of N

d dose of N

cation of N45DAS & 60

ication of K

ation of Zn

ication of Z

ication of N45 DAS & 6

a Coordina

and NAno‐

o P @ 2g DAS & 60

no P @ 2g DAS & 60

2PO4 @2%

O4 @ 25

SO4 @ 0.

no Zinc @ 45DAS & 6

no Zinc @ 45DAS & 6

oll weight

0.13 g per

ghest yield

on of ZnSO4

ters of wat

and NAno

ments

NK

NPK

Nano P @ 00

KH2PO4

nSO4 @ 25

ZnSO4 @ 0

Nano Zinc 60 DAS

D

ated Resea

‐P on yield

Photor

2

2

2

2

% 1

2

2

60 2

60 2

was incre

r 15 liters o

d (3238.65

4 @ 0. 2%

ter at 45DA

o‐P on yield

0.13 g per 1

kg/ha

0. 2% at 45

@ 0.13 g p

D - 47

arch Projec

d and yield

synthetic rate

22.8

26.8

28.3

27.5

16.2

26.5

22.4

29.4

24.0

2.1

ased signif

of water a

5 kg ha‐1) a

at 45DAS &

AS & 60) (T

d and yield

15

DAS

per 15

ct on Cotto

d compone

Conduct

0.25

0.244

0.23

0.20

0.14

0.19

0.277

0.348

0.26

0.04

ficantly by

t 45 DAS &

and boll w

& 60 DAS)

Table 50)

d compone

Seed cottYield (kg/

2549

2610

2944

2735

2685

3213

3239

436

on – Annu

ents in cott

tance Tra

2

4

5

1

6

2

7

8

6

3

y applicatio

& 60 DAS).

weight (3.47

and T3 (T3

ents (Sriga

ton /ha) we

al Report

ton in Dha

anspirationrate

4.55

4.09

3.91

3.41

2.35

3.32

4.31

4.64

4.45

0.62

on of T7 (T7

. The data

7 g) but it

3.T1+Foliar

anganagar

Boll eight (g)

3.1

3.0

3.0

3.1

3.1

3.4

3.5

0.3

(2016 – 17

arwad

n YieldKg ha‐

1566

1513

1153

1219

1287

1542

1357

1427

1345

25

7.T2 + Folia

a presente

was at pa

applicatio

)

Boll no /plant

39.7

45.6

39.5

42.4

46.7

44.9

53.6

8.4

7)

1

ar

d

ar

n

Bioch

Dharw

underparamgenotIrrespand signifimaintNDLHrainfe(Table Table

AKH‐1

RB‐61

RB‐61

CPD‐1

CPD‐1

ARBH

L‐106

PH‐10

NDLH

NDLH

RAH‐1

RAH‐1

BGDS

CCH‐1

Suraj

NDLH

Sahan

IC

hem 1: SIr

wad

The expr two wameter in thtype to mpective of wAKH‐1301icantly higtaining hig‐2030‐2, Aed conditioe 51).

e 51: Leaf p

Gen

1301

10

11

1651

1652

‐1651

0

071

‐2027

‐2030‐2

1070

1071

‐1072

16‐3

(QC)

‐1938

na (LC)

M

W

W

CAR ‐ All In

Screening rrigated &

periment water regimhese two cmoisture stwater regi. Three gher prolineher tissue ARBH‐1651on which a

proline con

notypes

Mean

WR

G

WRXG

ndia Coord

of cotto& Rainfed

was conducmes (rainfeconditionstress. Highme, the hgenotypese content water pot1, NDLH‐1also exhibi

ntent and s

inated Res

BIO C

on genotycondition

cted to kned and nes were woher prolineigher prolis viz., RBunder raintential und1938 and ited highe

seed cotto

L

RF

13.5

13.5

17.6

12.6

13.2

11.8

14.0

13.7

13.7

15.6

12.3

11.8

10.4

10.8

12.9

11.7

10.3

S Em

0.04

0.08

0.12

D - 48

search Pro

CHEMIST

ypes for n)

ow the peeed basedrked out te was recine contenB‐611, NDnfed than ider water sSahana shr and stab

on yield un

Leaf prolin

F

56

55

63

65

29

82

09

76

70

61

39

82

45

85

90

75

39

12.26

m±

40

88

28

oject on Co

TRY

abiotic s

erformanced irrigatedto assess torded in nt was recoDLH‐2030‐2rrigated costress. Thehowed higble yield in

nder rainfe

e content

IR

12.

13.

9.7

10.

13.

9.7

9.2

10.

11.

7.1

11.

9.4

10.

10.

14.

7.9

9.6

CD@

0.2

0.2

0.3

otton – An

stress tol

e of selected). The cthe relativrainfed thorded in C2 and NDondition ine genotypegher prolinn rainfed t

ed and irrig

at 140 DA

R

86

07

72

46

16

75

21

00

44

13

54

48

30

39

19

94

66

11.30

@5%

24

25

36

nual Repo

lerance (

ed 17 cotthanges inve performhan irrigatCPD‐1652, DLH‐1938 ndicating thes CPD‐165ne accumuthan irriga

gated cond

AS (µg g‐1 fr

0

ort (2016 –

Need bas

ton genotyn biochemmance of eed conditSuraj, RB‐accumulaheir ability52, CPD‐16ulation unted condit

dition

r. wt.)

Mean

13.21

13.31

13.68

11.56

13.23

10.78

11.65

11.88

12.57

11.37

11.97

10.65

10.37

10.62

13.55

9.85

10.02

17)

sed

ypes mical each ion. 610 ated y for 651, nder tion

NAU, Su

Screenincontent lower psignificareducingfor CPDlower fohigher indifferenchloroph Seed pro

CCSHAU

The seedIsomersthe entrwas obstheir oilgiven inobserveIt was relow (‐ Isgossypo HAU, Hihighest 6056 (19CCSHAUShakti V907 (Br no. 6009 NAU, Su

results s

observe

entry no

The low

no.623 (

ICAR

urat

ng of genowas signif

proline contly deviag sugar fol‐1601 folloor SIMA‐5 n RB‐611 ft paramethyll stabilit

otein, oil a

U,Hisar

ds of test e) content. ries no.621served in el content. n table 3.1d in entry eported thsomer gosol) but in m

The trials isar centreoil conten9.75%), resU regional Vardhak Se25) and 609 in Bro3 (a

urat

Seed sam

showed th

d with ent

o. 607 (18

west gossy

(35.26 mg

R ‐ All India

types for dficantly higontent waated undelowed by owed by Cfollowed bfollowed bter indicatty index.

and gossyp

entries of The highe1 and 609 entry no. 6The +, ‐ g

1 indicatesno. 604. That entry nssypol) conmost of gen

Bro3, Bro5e were evt was founspectively.station, Sieeds, Hisar018 (Bro5aa) trial rec

ple of 42

hat signific

try no. 614

.95%). Gos

ypol conte

%) and en

a Coordina

drought togher in genas found er stress Suraj and CCH‐12‐2 by RS‐2835by Suraj anted a sign

pol conten

Br 02 trial est proteinwere at p640 and engossypol Iss that entrThe entry nno. 642 mntent. It hnotypes it w

5, Bro6, Brvaluated fond in Bro6 . Oil conteirsa were r the highea), respecteived from

genotype

ant variati

4 (19.16%)

ssypol con

nt was ob

ntry no.608

D

ated Resea

olerance banotype TCin RB‐617for the gCPD‐1602and AR‐915 and RB‐6d CPD‐160nificant re

nt of Br 02

(601‐642)n content (par with thntries no. somers anry no. 629no. 642 haay be expad about was found

ro6 IET, Bror oil contIET trial ennt of the tpresentedest oil contively. The m CCSHAU

s were an

ions amon

) followed

ntent range

bserved w

8 (35.32 m

D - 49

arch Projec

ased on bioH‐1777 fo7 followedgenotypes.. Chloroph108 where616. Mean01 under raelationship

genotypes

) were eva(26.91%) whe entry no605 and 6d total go9 had lowed very lowloited for 1/3 amouin 1:1 ratio

22, Br 24 tent. Amontry no. 70rials receivd in table 3tent 18.75highest oiregional st

nalyzed for

ngst genoty

by entry n

es from 29

with entry

mg %). Hig

ct on Cotto

o chemicalllowed by d by RB‐. AKH‐130hyll stabiliteas chloropn value of painfed conbetween

s

luated for was observo. 623. Th617 were fossypol conest total gw (– Isomerfurther brunt (– isomo.

Br 25 PAHng the Am08 (19.7 %ved from S3.4. Amon5 and 15.3il content tation, Sirs

r oil, goss

ypes. Signi

no. 611 (19

9.85 to 16

no. 624(2

gher gossy

on – Annu

l parameteGJHV‐477611. Redu01 showedy index waphyll stabiprotein in ndition.Cor yield and

protein, oved in Entrhe highestound at pntent wergossypol, wr) gossypolreeding promer gossyp

HT and Br merican an) and Br 25Shakti Vardng the two35 % was o(19.8 %) wsa.

ypol and

ificantly hi

9.07%), en

9.34 mg %

29.85mg %

pol conten

al Report

ers found t7 and ARBHucing sugd significaas significaility index leaf was srrelation od proline

oil and gossry No. 623. oil contenar with ene evaluatewhereas, h content (Togramme pol) of the

25 CAHT gnd Desi co5 CAHT triadhak Seedso trials recobserved iwas observ

protein co

igher oil co

try no. 62

% in differe

%) followe

nt was fou

(2016 – 17

that prolinH‐1601 anar contenantly loweantly highewas founsignificantlf yield witas well a

sypol (+ & . Howevernt (19.75%ntry 640 foed by UPLhighest waTable 53). to produce (+ isome

grow at CCotton trialsal entry nos, Hisar anceived fromn entry noved in entr

ontent. Th

ontent wa

2 (18.97%

ent entries

d by entr

nd in entr

7)

e d nt er er d y h as

‐ r, %) or C as e er

CS s, o. d m o. ry

e

as

),

s.

ry

ry

no. 61

in ent

% res

Table

Entry c

601

602

603

604

605

606

607

608

609

610

611

612

613

614

615

616

617

618

619

620

621

622

623

624

625

626

627

628

629

630

631

632

633

634

635

636

637

638

639

640

641

642

C.D

IC

11 and 626

try no. 618

pectively)

e 52: Br 02

code Prote

1 22

2 21

3 20

4 22

5 25

6 24

7 25

8 24

9 25

0 24

1 23

2 24

3 22

4 23

5 24

6 25

7 24

8 21

9 19

0 22

1 25

2 23

3 26

4 24

5 22

6 19

7 21

8 22

9 18

0 22

1 24

2 21

3 19

4 21

5 23

6 19

7 24

8 24

9 23

0 24

1 22

2 22

D. 1.

CAR ‐ All In

6 (169.34 a

8 (23.48%)

(Table 52)

2a Seed pro

ein (%) Oil

2.91 17

1.06 13

0.55 14

2.91 15

5.76 19

4.08 17

5.09 17

4.76 15

5.76 15

4.09 15

3.41 18

4.76 13

2.07 16

3.75 15

4.76 17

5.26 18

4.42 19

1.73 16

9.88 17

2.40 18

5.93 15

3.58 14

6.61 15

4.42 15

2.23 16

9.88 18

1.56 16

2.07 16

8.87 15

2.91 14

4.25 15

1.73 15

9.72 17

1.06 15

3.08 13

9.38 14

4.25 16

4.42 18

3.24 15

4.09 19

2.91 17

2.24 14

.29 0.

ndia Coord

and 165.76

which wa

.

otein, oil aH

(%) Gossy(+ Iso

.80 0.8

.70 0.5

.65 0.8

.95 1.

.20 1.1

.80 0.9

.40 0.8

.95 0.5

.80 0.5

.30 0.7

.35 0.8

.10 0.6

.15 0.7

.60 0.7

.50 0.7

.55 0.6

.20 0.7

.20 0.5

.10 0.7

.65 0.5

.40 1.1

.60 0.8

.30 0.5

.15 0.8

.85 0.8

.40 0.8

.30 0.6

.15 0.6

.35 0.3

.75 0.8

.50 0.6

.65 0.5

.40 0.9

.55 0.7

.45 0.6

.30 0.4

.45 0.6

.65 0.6

.65 0.8

.75 0.9

.60 0.7

.10 0.6

54 0.0

inated Res

6 mg% res

as followed

and gossypHisar

ypol mer)

GosIso

83 0

57 0

87 0

2 0

12 0

93 0

87 0

51 0

56 0

70 0

88 0

68 0

74 0

72 0

74 0

67 0

73 0

52 0

77 0

56 0

12 0

88 0

57 0

83 0

86 0

89 0

60 0

69 0

38 0

89 0

66 0

52 0

91 0

76 0

60 0

46 0

66 0

63 0

83 0

90 0

79 0

63 0

02 0

D - 50

search Pro

spectively)

d by entry

pol conten

ssypol (‐omer) G

0.49

0.31

0.50

0.67

0.64

0.47

0.51

0.44

0.33

0.39

0.49

0.34

0.39

0.44

0.43

0.40

0.42

0.27

0.48

0.38

0.50

0.47

0.32

0.39

0.52

0.44

0.30

0.31

0.23

0.50

0.33

0.29

0.47

0.42

0.34

0.28

0.36

0.36

0.55

0.54

0.45

0.21

0.07

oject on Co

. The highe

no. 621 an

t of genot

Total Gossypol

1.32

0.89

1.36

1.87

1.76

1.40

1.39

0.95

0.88

1.09

1.37

1.02

1.13

1.16

1.17

1.06

1.15

0.79

1.24

0.94

1.61

1.35

0.89

1.23

1.37

1.33

0.91

1.01

0.61

1.40

1.00

0.81

1.37

1.17

0.94

0.74

1.02

0.99

1.39

1.44

1.24

0.85

0.07

otton – An

est protein

nd 638 (22

ypes at Hi

Oil content (%)

17.46

18.53

17.97

18.55

18.50

18.90

18.95

18.36

18.83

17.70

19.07

18.04

18.40

19.16

17.51

17.49

18.68

18.07

18.75

18.44

18.58

18.97

17.01

17.75

17.38

18.16

18.43

17.88

17.36

18.56

17.39

17.93

18.40

17.97

17.73

18.16

18.21

18.46

18.38

18.45

17.71

17

0.1

nual Repo

n content w

2.40 mg%

sar & SuraS

Protein (mg/g of tissue)

10.97

18.49

13.45

20.82

12.64

17.65

20.69

15.89

17.63

12.60

17.75

13.40

20.68

11.49

15.79

19.82

21.50

23.48

21.16

16.72

22.40

17.23

16.09

15.41

18.43

17.07

10.92

14.77

13.63

13.54

12.43

20.82

16.64

21.16

18.80

18.28

20.46

21.52

17.89

19.45

21.25

7.71

196

ort (2016 –

was obser

and 21.52

at Surat

Gossy(mg%

80.6

73.2

131.5

160.2

109.5

108.0

112.5

35.3

37.6

41.0

169.3

75.5

164.2

42.0

62.7

55.1

39.4

46.7

104.4

54.8

110.1

124.5

35.2

29.8

121.9

165.7

94.1

110.5

65.1

126.8

130.8

161.8

125.0

129.8

128.8

164.7

36.1

117.3

147.4

116.7

127.8

16.5

0.42

17)

rved

mg

pol %)

62

28

50

29

54

05

55

32

67

09

34

58

25

01

70

12

46

74

40

84

10

54

26

85

90

76

12

52

10

88

86

82

04

87

86

72

15

39

44

76

88

54

2

Date post:	04-Nov-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

CROP PR ODUCTION AGRONOMY, PHYSIOLO GY AN D …aiccip.cicr.org.in/CD_16_17/6_Crop_Production.pdf ·...

Documents