+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Crossing the Quality Chasm

Crossing the Quality Chasm

Date post: 11-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: xanthe
View: 42 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Crossing the Quality Chasm. Second Report Committee on Quality of Health Care in America To order: www.nap.edu. Studies Documenting the “Quality Gap”. Literature reviews conducted by RAND Over 70 studies documenting quality shortcomings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
18
1 Crossing the Quality Chasm Second Report Second Report Committee on Committee on Quality of Health Quality of Health Care Care in America in America To order: www.nap.edu To order: www.nap.edu
Transcript
Page 1: Crossing the Quality Chasm

1

Crossing the Quality Chasm

Second ReportSecond Report

Committee onCommittee onQuality of Health Care Quality of Health Care

in Americain America

To order: www.nap.eduTo order: www.nap.edu

Page 2: Crossing the Quality Chasm

2

Studies Documenting the “Quality Gap”

Literature reviews conducted by RANDLiterature reviews conducted by RAND Over 70 studies documenting quality Over 70 studies documenting quality

shortcomingsshortcomings Large gaps between the care people should receive Large gaps between the care people should receive

and the care they do receiveand the care they do receive true for preventive, acute and chronictrue for preventive, acute and chronic across all health care settingsacross all health care settings all age groups and geographic areas all age groups and geographic areas

(Schuster et.al., MMFQ,1998 ;updated 2000)(Schuster et.al., MMFQ,1998 ;updated 2000)

Page 3: Crossing the Quality Chasm

3

Medical Errors are a Serious Problem

Over 35 studies documenting patient Over 35 studies documenting patient safety concernssafety concerns

Tens of thousands of Americans are Tens of thousands of Americans are seriously harmedseriously harmed

Most errors occur because of system Most errors occur because of system failures failures

Page 4: Crossing the Quality Chasm

4

Major Forces Influencing Health Care

Expanding Knowledge BaseExpanding Knowledge Base

““Current practice depends upon the clinical Current practice depends upon the clinical decision-making capacity and reliability of decision-making capacity and reliability of autonomous individual practitioners, for classes of autonomous individual practitioners, for classes of problems that routinely exceed the bounds of problems that routinely exceed the bounds of unaided human cognition.”unaided human cognition.”

Daniel R. Masys, M.D.Daniel R. Masys, M.D. 2001 IOM Annual Meeting2001 IOM Annual Meeting

Page 5: Crossing the Quality Chasm

5

Major Forces Influencing Health Care

Chronic Care NeedsChronic Care Needs

40% of population have one or more chronic 40% of population have one or more chronic conditionsconditions

Chronic conditions account for more than two-thirds Chronic conditions account for more than two-thirds of health care expenditures of health care expenditures (RWJF, 1996)(RWJF, 1996)

80/20 Rule: Limited number of conditions account 80/20 Rule: Limited number of conditions account for most of these health care expendituresfor most of these health care expenditures

Page 6: Crossing the Quality Chasm

6

Delivery System Increasingly Inadequate Dearth of clinical programs with necessary infrastructure Dearth of clinical programs with necessary infrastructure

Chronic Care Delivery Model (Wagner, 1996)Chronic Care Delivery Model (Wagner, 1996) Systematic approachSystematic approach Attention to information and self-management needs of Attention to information and self-management needs of

patientspatients Multi-disciplinary teamsMulti-disciplinary teams Coordination across settings and clinicians, and over timeCoordination across settings and clinicians, and over time Unfettered and timely access to clinical information Unfettered and timely access to clinical information

Page 7: Crossing the Quality Chasm

7

Committee’s Conclusion

The American health care delivery system The American health care delivery system is in need of fundamental change. The is in need of fundamental change. The current care systems cannot do the job. current care systems cannot do the job. Trying harder will not work. Changing Trying harder will not work. Changing systems of care will. systems of care will.

Page 8: Crossing the Quality Chasm

8

Five Part Agenda for Change

Commit to six aims for improvement Commit to six aims for improvement

Adopt “10 rules” to guide the redesign of careAdopt “10 rules” to guide the redesign of care

Implement effective organizational supportsImplement effective organizational supports

Focus efforts on “priority conditions”Focus efforts on “priority conditions”

Create environment that fosters improvementCreate environment that fosters improvement

Page 9: Crossing the Quality Chasm

9

Aims For Improvement

SafeSafe

EffectiveEffective

Patient-centeredPatient-centered

TimelyTimely

EfficientEfficient

EquitableEquitable

Page 10: Crossing the Quality Chasm

10

10 Simple Rules Continuous Healing Continuous Healing

RelationshipsRelationships Evidence-based Evidence-based

DecisionsDecisions Customized CareCustomized Care Patient is the Source Patient is the Source

of Controlof Control Shared KnowledgeShared Knowledge

TransparencyTransparency Safety is a System Safety is a System

PropertyProperty Cooperation Among Cooperation Among

Clinicians Clinicians Needs are AnticipatedNeeds are Anticipated Waste is Continuously Waste is Continuously

DecreasedDecreased

Page 11: Crossing the Quality Chasm

11

Organizational Supports to…

-- redesign care processesredesign care processes-- invest in information technologyinvest in information technology- - management of knowledge and skillsmanagement of knowledge and skills- - develop effective multidisciplinary teamsdevelop effective multidisciplinary teams- - coordinate carecoordinate care-- measure and improve performance and measure and improve performance and

outcomes outcomes

Page 12: Crossing the Quality Chasm

12

Focus on Priority Conditions

AHRQ should identify 15 priority conditionsAHRQ should identify 15 priority conditions

Congress should establish $1B Innovation Congress should establish $1B Innovation Fund Fund

There should be substantial improvements in There should be substantial improvements in quality for priority conditions over the next 5 quality for priority conditions over the next 5 yearsyears

Page 13: Crossing the Quality Chasm

13

Align Environmental Forces

Four Critical Forces: Four Critical Forces:

1. 1. Information TechnologyInformation Technology2. 2. PaymentPayment3.3. Clinical Knowledge Clinical Knowledge 4.4. Professional WorkforceProfessional Workforce

Page 14: Crossing the Quality Chasm

14

Align Environmental Forces

Information TechnologyInformation Technology

Call for renewed national commitment to building an Call for renewed national commitment to building an information infrastructure to support care delivery, information infrastructure to support care delivery, consumer health, public accountability, public health, consumer health, public accountability, public health, research, and clinical educationresearch, and clinical education. .

Goal: elimination of most handwritten clinical data by Goal: elimination of most handwritten clinical data by 20102010

Page 15: Crossing the Quality Chasm

15

Aligning Environmental Forces

PaymentPayment

Current payment policies are complex and Current payment policies are complex and contradictory, and often work contradictory, and often work againstagainst efforts to efforts to improve quality. improve quality.

Payment methods should provide an opportunity for Payment methods should provide an opportunity for providers to share in the benefits of quality providers to share in the benefits of quality improvementimprovement

Page 16: Crossing the Quality Chasm

16

Aligning Environmental Forces

Clinical KnowledgeClinical Knowledge

Focusing on priority conditions, a public - private partnership Focusing on priority conditions, a public - private partnership should:should:- synthesize evidence - synthesize evidence - identify best practices in care delivery- identify best practices in care delivery- communicate evidence to public and professionals - communicate evidence to public and professionals - develop and apply decision support tools- develop and apply decision support tools- establish goals for improvement in care processes- establish goals for improvement in care processes- develop core sets of quality measures- develop core sets of quality measures

Page 17: Crossing the Quality Chasm

17

Aligning Environmental Forces

Professional WorkforceProfessional Workforce

A multidisciplinary summit of leaders within the A multidisciplinary summit of leaders within the health professions should be held to discuss and health professions should be held to discuss and develop strategies for develop strategies for -- restructuring clinical education at all levelsrestructuring clinical education at all levels-- assessing the implications of change for assessing the implications of change for

credentialing programscredentialing programs

Page 18: Crossing the Quality Chasm

18

Crossing the Quality Chasm: Next Steps

2001 - 2003 2001 - 2003 Project AreasProject Areas

Priority Conditions Priority Conditions Reports to Monitor and Track QualityReports to Monitor and Track Quality Health Professions SummitHealth Professions Summit Nursing Work Environment and Patient SafetyNursing Work Environment and Patient Safety 11stst Annual Chasm Summit Annual Chasm Summit Related IT InitiativeRelated IT Initiative


Recommended