+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

Date post: 06-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: jazzpcsoluciones
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 8

Transcript
  • 8/17/2019 Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

    1/8

    This article was downloaded by: [190.40.169.28]On: 13 October 2014, At: 23:05Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registeredoffice: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

    New Zealand Journal of Marine andFreshwater ResearchPublication details, including instructions for authors and

    subscription information:

    http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzm20

    Crustorhabditis chitwoodi sp. nov.(Nematoda: Rhabditidae): An intertidalspecies from the coast of New South

    Wales, Australia, with observations onits ecology and life historyWarwick L. Nicholas

    a

    a Division of Botany and Zoology , Australian National University ,

    Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia E-mail:

    Published online: 30 Mar 2010.

    To cite this article: Warwick L. Nicholas (2004) Crustorhabditis chitwoodi sp. nov. (Nematoda:Rhabditidae): An intertidal species from the coast of New South Wales, Australia, with observations

    on its ecology and life history, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 38:5,

    803-808, DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2004.9517279

    To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2004.9517279

    PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

    Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as tothe accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinionsand views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Contentshould not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever orhowsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arisingout of the use of the Content.

    This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Anysubstantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,

    http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzm20http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2004.9517279http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/00288330.2004.9517279http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzm20

  • 8/17/2019 Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

    2/8

    systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

    http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

  • 8/17/2019 Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

    3/8

    New Zealand Journal

      of

     Marine

      and

     Freshwater   Research, 2004,

      Vol

    38Nicholas—Crustorhabditischitwoodisp.n

    0 0 2 8 - 8 3 3 0 / 0 4 / 3 8 0 5 - 0 8 0 3

      ©

     T h e

      R o y a l S o c i e t y

     of

     N e w

      Z e a l a n d 2 0 0 4

    803

      rustorhabditis

     chitwoodi sp nov.

     Nematoda:

     Rhabditidae):

    an

     intertidal

     spec ies from the coast of New

     South

     Wales,

    Australia, with observations on its ecology and  life history

    WAR WICK L. NICHOLAS

    Division of Botany and Z oology

    Australian National University

    Canberra

    ACT 0200, Austral ia

    email: [email protected]

    Abstract  A new species,  Crustorhabditis chit-

    woodi ,

     w as discovered in nutrient agar plates inocu-

    lated with beach sand co llected from an o cean beach

    in New South Wales, Austral ia.

     The

      three other

    known species

     of

     the genus have

     all

     been found

     as

    commensal inhabitants

     of

     ocypodid shore crabs.

     It

    is suggested that the sand inoculum was seeded w ith

    dauer larvae of the nematod e that had been dispersed

    by scavenging crabs. The  new species is distin-

    guished from the three previously described species

    by possessing a  smaller number of differently ar-

    ranged bursal papillae, eight rather than

     10. The

    species

     is

     amphim ictic, oviparous,

     and

     produces

    abundant dauer larvae

     in

     culture, which can be sus-

    tained indefinitely

      on sea

     water nutrient agar

     in

    which

     it

     feeds

     on

     associated bacteria.

    K e y w o r d s

      Crustorhabditis;

     Brach yura; in tertidal

    beach; marine; nematode

    M0 4115; Online publication date

     24

     November 2004

    Received 1 June 2004; accepted

     9

     September 2004

    INTRODUCTION

    The name  Crustorhabditis  was given by Sudhaus

    (1974) to an ew subgenus of Rhabditidae to accom-

    modate three species that are intimately associated

    with beach-inhabi t ing ocypodid crabs . The new

    species, described in this paper, was c ollected from

    a sandy beach

     in

     south-eastern A ustralia awa y from

    crabs

     and can

      reproduce

     in the

     laboratory

     in

     their

    absence.

     The

     ghost crab,

      Ocypode cardimana  is

    found o n the same beach, but with burrows near the

    high t ide mark. Sudhaus (1974) described

     C

    riemanni, the type species, from nem atodes cultured

    in the laboratory from specimens isolated from  the

    mouthparts  and branchia l chamber  of  Ocypode

    kuhlii, where it apparently lives as a saprobiont. T he

    crab cam e from  a beach at Kikambala, K enya, E ast

    Afr ica . Most Rhabdi t idae

      are

      bacteria-feeding

    terrestrial nematodes and, al though

     a

     number

     of

    bacteria-feeding Rhad itidae are comm only found in

    the intert idal zone, only

      the

      three previously

    described species

     of

     Crustorhabd itis

     are

     known

     to

    be closely associated with crabs.

    Chitwood (1935) originally described

      C. ocypo-

    dis,  which

     he

     found

      on the

     eggs

     of O albicans

    inhabit ing

      a

      sandy beach

      in

     North Carol ina ,

     as

    Parasitorhabditis ocypodis, but

     later changed

     the

    n a me  to Rhab ditis ocypodis  (Chitwood, 1951).

    Sudhaus (1974) redescribed the species from fixed

    material obtained by R iemann from   O. albicans from

    a sandy Caribbean beach  in  Colum bia, South

    Am erica. Sudhaus also redescribed

     C. scanica,

     origi-

    nally named

      Rhabdit is scanica  by

     Allgén (1949),

    from specimens found between the mo uthparts of the

    same beach crab that hosted

      C. riemanni

     when

     the

    crab was collected

     at

     Kikambala

     in

     Kenya.

    Crustorhabditis  is morphologically very close to

    the subgenus M esorhabditis  Osche, 1952. Osche's

    mon ograph sets out to review the morphology of all

    the then described species of Rhabd itis, but over-

    looked Allgén's description of R. scanica.  Osche

    assigned

     R. ocypodis

      Chitwood, 1935,

     to R habdit is

    (Mesorhabditis) ocypodis.

      Dougherty (1955),

     in a

    nomenclatorial review

     of

     the Rhabd it idae Örley,

  • 8/17/2019 Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

    4/8

    804

    New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 2004, Vol. 38

    1880, assigned both  R. scanica  and R. ocypodis  to

    the subgenus  M esorhabditis . In a mono graph on the

    taxonomy of the Rhabdi t idae, Andràssy (1983)

    raised O sche's (1952) subgenera to generic rank.

    METHODS

    A culture of   C. chitwoodi  sp. nov. was established

    fortuitously when a small amo unt of beach sand was

    scattered on a 5 0 cm agar plate. The medium was 2

    agar in sea water enriched w ith 5 m g Na

    2

    S iO

    3

    ,5 mg

    K

    2

    HPO

    4

     and 5 mg Fe(NH

    4

    )

    2

    (S O

    4

    )

    2

     per litre.

    The intention had been to culture algae and

    diatoms as part of ongoing studies of the dietary

    habits of nematodes, but instead brown clumps of

    glutinous bacteria-forming rosettes of cocci formed,

    later to be dispersed and fed upon by the nematodes.

    Some nematod es were transferred to 0.5 bacterio-

    logical nutrient agar in sea water. Dense cultures and

    many gen erations of the nem atodes were ma intained

    by serial subculture on the same nutrient agar

    medium. At this agar concentration the nematodes

    move freely through the medium and are not

    restricted to the surface.

    Individual larval nematodes, or small groups of

    eggs,

      or newly hatched larvae were transferred to

    small 5 cm closed agar plates and incubated at 20°C

    to study the life cycle. All the nematodes fed on

    bacteria transferred with the nema tode inoculum.

    Nematode type specimens were fixed in 5

    formalin plus 10 acetic acid for 24 h then washed

    in distilled water and transferred to 5 aqueo us

    glycerol. Water was evaporated in an oven at 40°C

    and the nem atod es were then transferred with a fine

    needle to anhydrous glycerol on glass slides and a

    cover sl ip was supported by fine glass beads

    (ballatini) and ringed with Glyceel (G urr). M easure-

    ments were made of nematodes after fixation and

    mounting in this way.

    SYSTEMATICS

    A diagnosis of genus   Crustorhabditis is taken from

    Andràssy's (1983) taxonomic monograph on the

    Rha bditoidea, w hich places the genus hierarchically

    in the Rhabd itidae, and M esorhabditinae. The body

    is relatively large, 0.8 to 4 mm long, cuticle with

    transverse annules and fine longitudinal striae. Head

    slightly offset, lips well separated with small rod -like

    papillae, amphids very small, on lateral lips. Stoma

    (buccal cavity) 1.5 to 2 times as long as head

    diameter. Cheilostom not cuticularised, promesos-

    tom tubular with parallel walls; metastom consisting

    of three hemispherical swellings, each bearing two

    minute den ticles; pharyngeal sleave do es not invest

    promesostom . Pharygeal corpus swollen, muscular,

    isthmus long and non -muscular, nerve ring encloses

    isthmus posteriorly, metacorpus with cuticular valve,

    muscular, cardia small tripartite enclosed by anterior

    intestine. Female gonad unpaired prodelphic, vulva

    far posterior, close to anu s, tail conical. Ma le gona d

    unpaired, spicules strong, the posterior two thirds

    fused, bursa pelloderean, open anteriorly, anterior

    half with crenulated margin, 10 pairs of genital

    papillae present, two of them lying prean al, tail very

    short, phasmids open close to anus.

    Sudhaus & Fitch (2001) give a very detai led

    review of the genus

      Crustorhabditis

      based on

      C .

    ocypodis

      and

      C. r iemanni,

      but ignore

      C. scanica.

    Crustorhabditis

      is morphologically very close to

    Mesorhabdit is

      and two of the three previously

    described species were transferred by Sudhaus

    (1974) to the newly created genus   Crustorhabditis.

    In distinguishing the two genera, Sudhaus draws

    attention to their association with beach-inhabiting

    ocypodid crabs, their large size, the crenulated

    anterior bursal velum, the strong spicules fused for

    the posterior two thirds of their length (in

      Mesor-

    habditis

     usually fused for less than two thirds of their

    length).

     Crustorhabditis scanica

     is smaller than the

    other two species and the dependen ce of this species

    on ocypod id crabs needs qualification.

    Type species

    Crustorhabditis chitwoodi  sp. nov.

    Material examined

    Holotype  male, AN IC slide 32 specimen

     4 1:

     Allo-

    type female, slide 32 specimen 4 2; 9 paratype m ales:

    slide 33 specimen 45, slide 35 specimens

      5 0 - 5 3 ,

    slide 36 specimens 5 7-5 9; slide 37 specimen 6 1; 9

    paratype females: slide 32 specimens 43–44, slide

    33 specimen 4 6, slide 34 specimens 4 7–49, slide 36

    specimen 60, slide 37 specimens

      6 2 - 6 3 .

      All type

    specimens taken from same agar plate culture

    inocula ted with beach sand from the Brou lee beach,

    New South Wales on 4 April 2004. Type specimens

    are deposited in the Austral ian National Insect

    Collection, Nematode Collection (ANIC), CSIRO

    Entomology, G.P.O Box 1700, Canberra , ACT,

    Australia.

  • 8/17/2019 Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

    5/8

    Nicholas— Crustorhabdit is chitwoodi sp. nov

    805

    Description

    Measurements in µm are given in Table 1, see also

    Fig. 1.

    Holotype male  Body predominantely cylindrical,

    tapered towards the head and truncated abruptly at

    the posterior end; cuticle annulated; six slightly

    offset lips bearing papilliform outer labial and

    cephalic papillae, inner labial papillae not visible.

    Cheilostom not cuticularised, Promesostom cylin-

    drical, parallel sided, strongly cuticularised; a nterior

    pharynx muscular, expanded to form muscular

    corpus, followed by non-m uscular narrower isthmus,

    then expanded to form muscular metacorpus;

    metacorpus with semilunar cuticular valves,

    terminating in tripart i te short muscular cardia.

    Straight intest ine, anteriorly encloses cardia,

    terminates in short narrower rectum , about level with

    spicule capitulum, that terminates in cloaca. Single

    testis, vas deferens ventral to gut, opens ven trally to

    cloaca. Paired, long strongly built spicules, with

    distinct capitulum, grooved shaft, fused for posterior

    two thirds of their length, with sharp straight tip.

    Bursa open a nteriorly, velum crenulated for anterior

    half eight paired bursal rays, two short pair

    pre-cloacal, one pair at level of cloacal opening,

    paired group of three post-cloacal then two more

    pairs slightly separated from their group of three, at

    extreme posterior of bursal velum, beside very short

    tail, triangular from dorsal view, no terminal notch

    in velum (Fig 1).

    Five paratype m ales do not differ significantly

    from holotype.

    Allotype female  Essentially similar to male apart

    from sexual organs and po sterior end of body. Single

    ovary, uterus and oviduct ventral to gut, oviduct

    terminating in a posterior vulva, close to but anterior

    to an us. Oviduct with two uncleaved eggs. Tail initially

    conical but drawn out into a terminal filament.

    The excretory system described by Sudhaus &

    Fitch (2001) was not identified in any of the types

    or paratypes. A small perturbation of the cuticle

    posterior to the nerve ring observed in several

    specimens may be the excretory pore, but no

    terminal cuticular duct was evident so the identity

    of the cuticular structure is doubtful. Perhaps the

    excretory system is less prominent in specimens

    cultured in a saline medium than in typical terrestrial

    rhabditids.

    Table

    Measurements of type specimens of  Crustorhabdit is chitwoodi sp. nov. All measurements in µm.

    Type

    Length

    Buccal cavity

    Prostom

    Pharynx

    Head to corpus

    Corpus length

    Head to nerve ring

    Head to bulb

    Bulb length

    Head to intestine

    Head to gonad

    Spicule length

    Gubernaculum

    Bursa length

    Head to vulva

    Vulva to anus

    Head to anus

    Tail length

    Max. width

    Width at vulva

    Width at anus

    de M an's a

    de M an's b

    de M an's c

    de M an's V

    Holo.

    Male

    970

    22

    17

    194

    98

    41

    149

    182

    34

    223

    317

    67

    48

    53

    95 3

    17

    43

    23

    23

    5.0

    40

    Males

    Mean

    1020

    23

    17

    194

    93

    35

    144

    174

    35

    21 8

    32 8

    62

    37

    58

    989

    24

    43

    23

    24

    5.3

    4 2

    n = 10

    SD

    57

    1.66

    1.48

    9.6

    8.61

    3.6

    10.4

    10

    4.0

    10.4

    31

    4.6

    6.4

    5.6

    56

    2.3

    4.9

    2.07

    2.91

    0.23

    2.1

    Range

    970-1084

    19-24

    15-19

    196-202

    77-101

    31–41

    134-158

    161-188

    30–43

    199-226

    283-379

    53-67

    26–48

    53-70

    944-1065

    2 4 -3 6

    36–48

    2 0 -2 6

    2 1 -3 0

    5.0-5.6

    37-57

    Allo.

    Female

    1090

    22

    17

    196

    91

    41

    1581

    185

    41

    22 6

    468

    960

    41

    1001

    89

    43

    43

    26

    25

    5.6

    12.3

    88

    Females

    Mean

    1086

    22 2

    18

    193

    93

    3.5

    158

    180

    38

    218

    34 9

    961

    49

    946

    89

    40

    36

    27

    28

    5.6

    12.3

    89

    n=  10

    SD

    64

    3.0

    2.4

    10.9

    4.0

    8.84

    10.4

    2.9

    12.4

    41

    58

    4.5

    8.62

    67

    3.1

    6.2

    3.1

    5.63

    4.61

    0.24

    1.15

    1.8

    Range

    –10841090

    17-24

    17-22

    178-213

    86-96

    29–41

    132-136

    161-195

    35–41

    197-228

    332-467

    883-990

    4 3 - 5 3

    869-1039

    82-101

    36–48

    30-46

    19-41

    2 2 -3 4

    5.2-5.9

    9.7-13.1

    86-89

  • 8/17/2019 Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

    6/8

    80 6

    New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 2004, Vol. 38

    50ftm

    X

    Fig. 1   Crustorhabdit is  sp. nov.

    50 nm A, head and pharyngeal region; B,

    head and buccal cavity; C, hind

    end of female in lateral view; D,

    hind end of male in lateral view;

    E, hind end of male in dorsal view.

     

    chitwoodi

     

    riemanni

     

    scanica

      ocypodis

    Fig . 2 Com parison of the bursal

    region and bursal papillae of all

    four known species of the genus

    Crustorhabdit is. C. riemanni, C.

    ocypodis,

      and

      C. scanica

      from

    Sudhaus (1974);  C. chitwoodi,  n.

    sp .

     original. Drawin gs not to same

    scale.

  • 8/17/2019 Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

    7/8

    Nicholas— Crustorhabdit is chitwoodi sp. nov

    807

    Dauer larvae, 536-78 7 µm long 21- 24 µm wide,

    accumulate in cultures. These are a non-growing

    dispersive stage in the life cycle. In common with

    other Rhabdit idae, these dauer larvae retain the

    cuticle of the second instar, the lips and lumen of the

    alimentary canal are closed, but they retain m otility.

    Differential diagnosis

    Significant differences between   C. chitwoodi  sp .

    nov.,

      C. r iemanni, C . ocypodis ,

      an d

      C. scanica

      are

    listed in Table 2.

     C . r iemanni

      an d

     C. ocypodis

      are

    much larger than the other two species, which are

    of comparable size. De M an 's ratios of pharyngeal

    length to body length,

      b ,

      and tail length to body

    length, c, as well as the ratio of the distance b etween

    the vulva and an us to tail length and the absolute tail

    length are greater in the former two, probably related

    to their greater size. De Man's rat ios are not

    independent of body length.  C. scanica has shorter

    spicules than any of the other three species.

      C .

    scanica

      an d

      C. chitwoodi,

      sp. nov. are more alike

    than the other two. However, the most significant

    difference between the four species is the difference

    in the number and disposition of the bursal papillae

    (Fig. 2). Unlike the other species with 10 pairs,  C .

    chitwoodi  sp. nov. has only 8 pairs. Baird (2001)

    shows that in the rather closely related   Caeno-

    rhabditis briggsae  the bursal papillae are a good

    indicator of species, although some variation can

    occur in strains.

    Type locality

    Mid-tide level on a sandy beach at Broulee on the

    South East Coast of New South Wales, Australia,

    La titu de 35º55¢ , Lon gitu de 150º9¢ .

    Etymology

    The specific epithet nam ed in hono ur of the greatest

    nematologist and the describer of

      Crustorhabditis

    ocypodis .

    Reproductive biology

    Crustorhabditis chitwoodi sp. nov. is amphimictic,

    with approximately equal numbers of male and

    female progeny. Females are normally oviparous,

    but sometimes eggs hatch   in utero   and the larvae

    devour the mother, i.e.,  endotokia matricida.  Chen

    & Caswell-Chen (2003) show that in the related

    rhabditid

      Caenorhab ditis elegans

     this behaviour is

    an adaptive response to failing food resources. In the

    absence of ma les, females die with several unhatched

    eggs

      in utero.

      Protandrous hermaphrodi t i sm,

    comm on in some rhabditids, has not been observed.

    The generation time at 20°C is c. 7 days.

    Ecology

    Crustorhabditis ocypodis  was recovered from the

    eggs of the shore crab

      Ocypode albicans

      in North

    Carolina in North Am erica by Chitwood (1935) and

    again from the branchial chamber of the same

    species from Columbia in South America

    (Rieman n, 1970).

     C. riemanni

     has been found in the

    branchial chamber and between the mouth parts of

    the shore crab  Ocypode kuhlii in Ken ya, East Africa,

    together with  C. scanica. How ever, C. chitwoodi sp.

    nov. was not found in direct association with crabs

    when it was recovered from sand at mid-tide level,

    although

      Ocypode cardimana

      occurs on the same

    beach clo se to the high tide mark. Con sequently this

    species is not totally restricted in its distribution to

    the immed iate presence of crab s. It can multiply for

    Table 2

      Com parison of significant taxono mic measurements of three previously described species of

     Crustorhah bdit is

    an d

     C . chitwoodi

     sp. nov. All measurements in µm.

    Species:

    Sex:

    Body length

    Vulva-anus/tail

    Tail length

    Spicules length

      spicule fused

    Bursal formula

    d eM a n s ' a

    de Ma n's b

    de Ma n's c

    C. riemanii

    Male

    1895-2820

    0.96

    27-54

    53-62

    66

    2 .2 .6= 10

    16.5-21.8

    6.5-9.1

    39.2-64.7

    Female

    2422-3890

    91-158

    14.5-23

    7.9-11.8

    19.6-35.8

    C. ocypodis

    Male

    2015-2380

    0.68

    24-30

    65-71

    69

    2.1.7 = 10

    26.7–40.4

    6.1-7.4

    71.1-98.5

    Female

    2 4 2 2 3 8 9 2 1 5 – 2 3 8

    101-162

    25.4-38.9

    6.8-8.7

    14.2-17.8

    C. scanica

    Male

    7 8 5 - 1 1 7 0

    17-26

    38–48

    54

    2.8  = 10

    15.0-22.8

    4 . 0 - 6 . 5

    31 .4-49 .3

    Female

    857-1516

    0.56

    8 3 - 1 2 5

    15.0-22.816

    6.1-7.46.8

    8.7-16.4

    C .

     chit

    Male

    970-1084

    24-36

    53-67

    57-60

    2.1.3.2 = 8

    21-30

    5.0-5.6

    37.3-57

    woodi

    Female

    950-1090

    0.40-0.63

    82-101

    22-34

    5.2-5.9

    8.7-1

  • 8/17/2019 Crustorhabdsaditis Chitwoodi Sp. Nov. (Nematoda Rhabditidae)

    8/8

    80 8

    New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 2004, Vol. 38

    many generations on nutrient agar, feeding on

    associated bacteria.

    The dependence of   C. scanica  for reproduction

    on the presence of crabs is uncertain. Schuurmans

    Stekhoven (1943) reported   Rhabdit is monhystera,

    which seems from its description to be a synonym

    for

      C. scanica,

      from sand together with the macro-

    algae

      Codium

     and

      Caulerpa

     in the Mediterranean.

    According to Sudhaus (1974), Allgén (1934)

    reported a single male as

     Rhab ditis marina

     with the

    bursal papilla formula of 2/8 so that this specimen

    was in all probability   C. scanica.  Allgén (1949),

    again according to Sudhaus (1974), described   C .

    scanica as a new species from a single male derived

    from marine algae. Sudhaus (1974) equates the

    single female figured by Gerlach (1953) from c oastal

    ground water in Madagascar as

      C scanica,

      but its

    identi ty is by no means certain. In summary,

    although

      C. scanica

      has been found in the mouth

    parts of ocypode crabs it has also been found in the

    absence of crabs. Sudhaus suggests its dauer larvae

    may have been dispersed by c rabs.

    Although

      C. chitwoodi

     sp. nov. was not found in

    the proximity of crabs, ocypode crabs do inhabit the

    beach from which it was found. It is not a comm on

    inhabitant of the beach m eiofauna bec ause it has not

    previously been found in studies of this and neigh-

    bouring beaches during several years of sampling

    (Nicholas 200 1). The m ost likely explanation is that

    Ocypode cardimana

     crabs scavenge at night at low

    tide on the beach and disperse dauer larvae, as

    Sudhaus (1974) suggests, and though these are

    capable of feeding and reproducing on bacteria, the

    habitat does not facilitate sustained reproduction

    without direct association with ocypode crabs. It

    would be interesting to examine a number of the

    local ocypodid crabs for nem atodes, but the author

    sees no prospect of doing so in the near future.

    REFERENCES

    Allgén, C. 1949: Uber einiger sudschwedische Brack-

    wasser und Eardnematoden.

      Kunglia Fysiogra-

    fiska Säliskkapets i Lund Förhandlingar19: 1—19.

    Andràssy, I. 1983: A taxonomic review of the suborder

    Rhabditina (Nematoda: Secernentia). Edit ions de

    l Office de la Re sea rch e Scientifiqu e et Tec h-

    nique outra-mer. Paris. Pp 1-240.

    Baird, S. E. 2001: Strain specific variation in the pattern

    of caudal papillae in

      Caenorhabdit is briggsae

    (Nematoda: Rhabditidae); implications for spe-

    cies identification.  Nematology 3: 373-376 .

    Chen, J.; Caswell-Chen, E.

      2003:

      W hy

      Caenorhabdit is

    elegans  adults sacrifice their bodies to progeny.

    Nematology 5: 641-645.

    Chitwood, B . G. 1935: Nema todes parasitic in, and asso-

    ciated with, Crustacea, and description of some

    new species and a new variety.

      Proceedings of

    the Helminthological Society of Washington 2:

    93-96 .

    Chitwood, B. G. 1961: North American marine nema-

    todes.

     Texas Journal of Science 3:

     617-672.

    Dougherty, E. C. 1955: The genera and species of the

    subfamily Rhabditinae Micoletzky, 1922 (Nema-

    toda):

     a nom enclatorial analysis-including an ad-

    dendum on the composit ion of the family

    Rhabditidae Örley, 1880. Journal o f Helminthol-

    ogy 29:

      105-152.

    Gerlach, S. A. 1953: Recherches sur la faune des eaux

    interstitielles de Mad agascar.

     M émoires de l Institut

    scientifique de M adagascar Series A 8:

     73-86 .

    Nicholas, W. L. 2001: Seasonal variations in nematode

    assemblages on an Australian ocean beach; the

    effect of heavy seas and unusually high tides.

    Hydrobiologia 464:  127-26.

    Osche, G. 1952: Systematik und Phylogenie der Gatung

    Rhabditis

      (Nematoda).

      Zoologische Jahbücher

    (Systematik) 81:

     190-280.

    Riemanni, F. 1970: Das Keimenlückensustem von

    Krebsen as lebensraum der Meiofauna, mit

    Beschreibung freilebender Nematoden aus

    karibichen amphibish lebenden Decapoden.

    Veröffentl ichungen Insti tuts für Mee resforschung

    in Bremerhaven 12: 413–428.

    Schuurmans Stekhoven, J. H. Jr. 1943: Freilebende ma-

    rine Nematoden des Mittlemeeres. IV. Freilebende

    marine Nematodender Fischereigeregründe bei

    Alexandreien.

      Zoologische Jahbücher (Syste-

    matik) 76:

     417–465.

    Sudhaus, W. 1974: Nematoden (insbesondere Rhab-

    ditiden) des Strandanwurfs un ihre Beziiehungen

    zu Krebsen. F auist isch-Ökologisch Mittei lungen

    4: 365–400.

    Sudha us, W. 1974: Zur Systematik, Verbreitung, Öko logie

    und Biologie neuer und wenig bekannter Rhab-

    ditiden (Nematoden) 2. Teil. Part II.  Zoologische

    Jahbücher (Systematik) 101:  417–465.

    Sudhaus, W. Fitch 2001: Comparative studies on the

    phylogeny and systematics of the Rhabditidae

    (Nematoda). Journal of Nematology 33:   1-70.


Recommended