+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CSCE 330 Project Algol 68 Joe PuzioWael AL-Fayez Gaurav ShahRonak Patel.

CSCE 330 Project Algol 68 Joe PuzioWael AL-Fayez Gaurav ShahRonak Patel.

Date post: 22-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
23
CSCE 330 Project Algol 68 Joe Puzio Wael AL-Fayez Gaurav Shah Ronak Patel
Transcript

CSCE 330 Project Algol 68

Joe Puzio Wael AL-Fayez

Gaurav Shah Ronak Patel

History

ALGOrithmic Language Developed in Europe by an international group,

consisting of 7 different countries, in the late 1950’s

Very similar to FORTRAN Peter Naur and J.W. Backus worked on the

project. Was the debut of the BNF syntax. Designed specifically for programming scientific

computations

History (Continued)

Never became as commercially popular as FORTRAN or COBOL Was not compatible with IBM

Is considered the most important programming language in terms of influence on later language development

Many similar languages can (and are) referred to as “ALGOL-like” JAVA, C, C++, Pascal, Ada, FORTRAN, etc.

Design Goals

Design goals: general purpose, rigorously-defined

language Clears up trouble spots in ALGOL60

(but, Pascal more like A60 than A68 is)

orthogonality, extensibility

Features

Supports a Block Structure Two types of Parameter Passing

Value Name

Recursion Arrays Reserved Words

Failures and Shortcomings

The prime cause of the failure of ALGOL 68 was that too much was expected of it.

It was not widely implemented or not soon enough implemented.

Its formal definition was too complex to implement. ALGOL 68 is known to be ‘unreadable’. ALGOL 68 report was not properly typed hence too difficult

to read.       ALGOL 68 semantic model was too big with lots of

extensions  ALGOL 68 was a very mathematical language fairly difficult to understand, difficult to implement. The language was considered to complex for its time.

Key Ideas

User type declarations (modes) Reference mode (pointers of a sort) United modes (predecessor to variant

records) Auto declaration of FOR LOOP index User-specified operator overloading

Key Ideas (Continued)

Mode requirement for formals Casting: user-specified mode

conversion Redefinition of operator precedence Semaphores W-grammars - two-level grammar

Structure

ALGOL68 is block structured w/ static scope rules

ALGOL68's model of computation: static stack: block/procedure AR's; local data

objects heap: “heap” -- dynamic-- data objects

ALGOL68 is an expression-oriented language

Organization

Declarations: Must be given (FOR LOOP index only

exception) Can name new types (modes)

Imperatives (units) 15 major unit types Assignment is allowable side-effect of units

Algol 68 Modes

Primitive modes Compound Modes int --arrays Real --structures Char --procedures bool --sets string --pointers Compl(complex) bits bytes Sema (semaphore) Format (I/O) file

Other features of Algol 68

Storage management • Local storage on stack • Heap storage, explicit alloc and garbage

collection Parameter passing • Pass-by -value • Use pointer types to obtain Pass-by -

reference Assignable procedure variables • Follow “orthogonality ” principle rigorously

Source: Tanenbaum, Computing Surveys

Basic Syntax

Addition : “ + ” Subtraction : “ - ” Multiplication : “ * ” Division : “ / ” Exponentiation : “ ** ” Assignment : “ := ” Boolean Expressions

= , > , < , <= , >= , /=

Block Structure

First language to implement a block structure Similar in form to pascal

begin

…..

end;

Each block can have its own variables, visible only to that block (local variables). After the block is exited the values of all the local variables are lost.

Block Structure example

Example:

begin

own integer i; integer j,k;

i := j + k;

end; The integer i will have the value of j+k stored the

next time the block is entered

By using the “own” statement the variable will retain its value for the next time the block is entered

Parameter Passing

Two types of parameter passing: by Value, by Name Pass by Value works the same as in most other

languages Pass by Name is similar to pass by reference, but it adds

flexibility All parameters are pass by name unless otherwise

specified Example: can make a call “sum(i,2,5,x+6)” to the

procedure sumprocedure sum(i,j,k,l); value i,j,k;begin

i := i + j + k + lend;

(will execute as i := i + 2 + 5 + (x+6))

Recursion

Algol 68 Supports recursion

Example:

real procedure factorial (n);

begin

if n = 1 then

factorial := 1;

else

factorial := n* factorial(n-1);

end;

Arrays

Three types of arrays: real, integer, Boolean Each array must contain all the same types All arrays are of type real unless specified Can have multidimensional arrays Declarations:

array name1[1:100]; (1D array of type real) real array name2(-3:6,20:40); (2D array of type real) integer array name3, name4(1:46); (2 1D arrays of type integer) Boolean array name5(-10:n); (1D array of type Boolean)

(Allocated Dynamically)

Algol 68 presented the following innovations (among many):

A new level in language description with the semantics defined to mathematical precision as well as the syntax.

A formal method for describing, constructing and manipulating data types embodied in the language.

An abstract model of computation that can be applied across radically different (single and multi) processor designs (in direct contrast to C).

User-definable operators (in fact all the operators we normally take for granted as "built-in" are merely part of the Standard Prelude).

Support for parallel programming with the parallel-clause and Dijkstra semaphores.

Conclusion

General purpose algorithmic language with a clean consistent and unambiguous syntax.

Comprehensive fully-checked type-system covering structures, unions, pointers, arrays and procedures.

Procedures may be nested inside procedures and can deliver values of any type without you having to worry about where the storage is coming from.

User-defined operators including user-defined operator symbols.

Powerful control structures can deliver values of any type.

Conclusion

Dynamic sized arrays know their current bounds.

Array and structure displays can be used in any context.

Parallel programming with semaphores. Complex arithmetic. Declarations can be interleaved with

statements. Clear distinction between value semantics and

reference semantics. No distinction between compile-time constants

and run-time values.

References

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=155365&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=14638885&CFTOKEN=99793879

http://www.occl-cam.demon.co.uk/whitepaper.html#FirstExample:Animal

http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs242/slides/ml.pdf

Any Questions?


Recommended