+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CU_10.7.09 Final

CU_10.7.09 Final

Date post: 04-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: harini-ramaswamy
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 43

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    1/43

    1

    Advanced Corporate FinanceUniversity of Colorado-BoulderLeeds School of BusinessOctober 7, 2009

    Joseph J. Euteneuer

    Executive Vice President & CFO

    Qwest Communications

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    2/43

    2

    Agenda

    Background / The Business Environment The Streets Perspective

    Creating Shareholder Value

    Balanced Approach to Capital and Investing

    September 2009 Bond Offering

    Asset Strategic Review

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    3/43

    3

    Qwests Business

    Qwest14-state Local Service Area

    Qwest POPs

    VoIP Deployed CitiesVoIP Deployed Cities

    Qwest14-state Local Service Area

    Qwest POPs

    VoIP Deployed CitiesVoIP Deployed Cities

    Qwest14-state Local Service AreaQwest14-state Local Service Area

    Qwest POPs

    VoIP Deployed CitiesVoIP Deployed CitiesVoIP Deployed CitiesVoIP Deployed Cities

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    4/43

    4

    Euteneuer to Lead QwestsFinancesBy Roger ChengB5

    Qwest Communications International

    Inc. hired former XM Satellite Radio

    and Comcast Corp. executive Joseph

    Euteneuer to serve as chief financial

    officer

    Crisis on Wall Street as LehmanTotters, Merrill Is Sold, AIGSeeks to Raise Cash Fed WillExpand Its Lending Arsenal in aBid to Calm Markets; Moves Capa Momentous Weekend forAmerican FinanceBy Carrick Mollenkamp, Susanne Craig, Serena Ng and Aaron

    Lucchetti

    A1

    The American financial system was shaken to its core on Sunday.

    Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. faced the prospect of liquidation,

    and Merrill Lynch & Co. agreed to be sold to Bank of America

    Corp.

    September 15, 2008

    http://online.wsj.com/http://online.wsj.com/
  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    5/43

    5

    Total US Consumer Confidence Index: 3Q06 - 2Q10E

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    3Q06

    4Q06

    1Q07

    2Q07

    3Q07

    4Q07

    1Q08

    2Q08

    3Q08

    4Q08

    1Q09

    2Q09

    3Q09

    4Q09

    1Q10

    2Q10

    CC

    Index(1985=100

    )

    Single Family Homes - Building Permits

    2006 - 2010E

    -

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    3Q06 4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10

    BuildingPermits-National(M)

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    70,000

    80,000

    3Q06

    4Q06

    1Q07

    2Q07

    3Q07

    4Q07

    1Q08

    2Q08

    3Q08

    4Q08

    1Q09

    2Q09

    3Q09

    4Q09

    1Q10

    2Q10

    National

    The Business Environment Post 9/15

    Source: the Conference Board and NIPA; Moodys Economy.com Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics: Current Population Survey; Moody's Economy.com

    Source: Office of US District Courts; Moodys Economy.comSource: Bureau of Census: Form C-404; Moody's Economy.com

    U.S. Unemployment Rate: 2008 - 2011E

    1Q08

    2Q08

    3Q08

    4Q08

    1Q09

    2Q09

    3Q09

    4Q09

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11

    2Q11

    3Q11

    4Q11

    0.0%

    2.0%

    4.0%

    6.0%

    8.0%

    10.0%

    12.0%

    US US last qtr view

    U.S. Business Bankruptcy Filings: 3Q062010E

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    6/43

    66

    The Streets Perspective of Q

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    7/43

    77

    2009 Total Qwest Guidance

    Qwest is on track to meet Guidance and AnalystConsensus in 2009

    7

    2008 2009 Guidance 2009 Consensus

    Revenue 13,475$ n/a 12,367$

    External Adj. EBITDA 4,547$ $4,250 - $4,400 4,351$

    CapEx 1,777$ $1,700 or less 1,629$

    Normalized Free Cash Flow 1,439$ $1,500 - $1,600 1,561$

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    8/43

    8

    Buy/$5.00

    8

    Bank of America, David Barden Key Points

    Positive view of Qwest is based on several factors:1. Management focus on extracting value is a positive

    2. Potential for enhanced returns to shareholders

    Increased the probability of Qwest fully pre-funding the potentialput of its convertible senior notes in 2010

    3. Expect another wave of consolidation to emerge in 12 to 18months

    4. Valuation is attractive

    Qwests EBITDA multiple is the lowest in the sector while its 09E

    FCF yield of 21% is among the highest

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    9/43

    9

    Hold/No Price Target

    9

    Morgan Stanley, Simon Flannery Key Points

    Investment Conclusion Successfully tapped the credit markets, partially addressing its

    short-term maturity profile, easing concerns over its dividendsustainability

    The company has the ability to sustain its dividend:

    Substantial cash on hand

    Strong cash generation

    A ~$945M undrawn credit facility (as of July 29)

    Capital budget flexibility

    Revenue Generating Unit (RGU) growth, and its impact onrevenue growth, is the bigger obstacle for the stock

    Without the stabilization in RGU trends, it may be harder toattract longer-term investors

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    10/43

    10

    Sell/$2.75

    10

    Goldman Sachs, Jason Armstrong Key Points

    Revenue pressure making margin gains difficult to hold The glimmer of hope in AT&T/Verizon results around a

    consumer wireline inflection was not present at Qwest

    We still expect 2010 revenues to decline another 3.4%

    This will lead to 150 bp in 2010 margin pressure, with an

    EBITDA decline of 7.4% to $4.0 bn Tough balancing act ahead

    Peers have invested in video, which appears to be stabilizing lineloss, Qwest line loss stepped up another 50 bp QoQ

    Comparisons versus AT&T and Verizon in consumer are likely tobecome even more unfavorable given the current trajectory

    Attempts at structural value creation through monetizing certainassets seems unlikely as shown through the recent unsuccessfulauction of the companys backbone business

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    11/43

    1111

    Creating Shareholder Value

    Sustainable Free Cash Flow Growth

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    12/43

    1212

    Theoretically how share price is determined:Revenue OpEx = EBITDA

    EBITDA Capex Interest Working Capital = FCF

    FCF *Perception Value = Total Value

    Total Value Net Debt (Debt-Cash) = Equity Value

    Equity Value/Shares Outstanding = Share Price

    The value of a company is determined by itsexpected discounted Free Cash Flow

    *Perception Value - Shorthand metric to reflect the expected Discounted cashflows of a business, discount rate (including risk) and expected

    cash flows growth.

    Shareholder Value

    IncreasingShareholder

    Value

    Return onInvestment

    Capital

    WeightedAverage

    Cost of Capital

    SustainableFree Cash Flow

    Growth

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    13/43

    1313

    Analyst Estimates for Q

    Implied Implied

    Adj EBITDA Adj FCF

    Perception

    Value* Price Target Adj EBITDA Adj FCF

    Perception

    Value* Price Target

    Bank of America 4.24$ 1.49$ 12.9x 4.00$ 4.33$ 1.59$ 13.2x 5.00$

    BMO 4.31 1.39 13.8x 4.00 4.34 1.23 16.4x 4.50

    Citi 4.28 1.42 15.9x 6.00 4.40 1.59 13.8x 5.50

    Goldman Sachs 4.17 1.33 12.5x 2.50 4.34 1.59 10.7x 2.75

    JP Morgan 4.21 1.44 12.1x 3.00 4.33 1.65 13.7x 6.00

    Morgan Stanley 4.11 1.36 15.2x 4.93 4.36 1.55 n/a n/aOppenheimer 4.22 1.40 n/a n/a 4.32 1.51 n/a n/a

    Thomas Weisel 4.34 1.43 13.1x 3.75 4.32 1.50 12.9x 4.00

    UBS 4.14 1.32 13.9x 3.50 4.41 1.55 12.2x 3.80

    Wells Fargo 4.28 1.65 n/a n/a 4.42 1.69 n/a n/a

    Analyst Consensus 4.20 1.40 13.9x 4.19$ 4.35 1.56 13.0x 4.61$Max Estimate 4.31 1.65 15.9x 6.00 4.42 1.72 16.4x 6.00Min Estimate 4.11 1.32 12.1x 2.50 4.30 1.23 10.7x 2.75

    Budget 4.40 1.50 13.0x 4.40 1.50 13.0x

    Guidance 4.2 to 4.4 1.4 to 1.5 4.25 to 4.4 1.5 to 1.6

    * Implied Perception Value is defined as Q Enterprise value divided by the analyst's adjusted FCF estimate

    Feb-09 Sep-09

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    14/43

    14

    FCF x

    Implied

    Perception

    Value

    =Total

    ValueFCF x

    Implied

    Perception

    Value

    =Total

    Value

    1,591 x 13.2 = 20,942 1,589 x 10.7 = 17,065

    Total

    Value- Net Debt =

    Equity

    Value

    Total

    Value- Net Debt =

    Equity

    Value

    20,942 - 12,327 = 8,615 17,065 - 12,327 = 4,738

    Equity

    Value Shares =

    Price

    Target

    Equity

    Value Shares =

    Price

    Target8,615 1,723 = 5.00$ 4,738 1,723 = 2.75$

    Bank of America Valuation Model Goldman Sachs Valuation Model

    14

    David Bardens Perception of Q:

    Confident that Q will resolve debttowers through refinancing

    Meaningful results in businessmarkets

    Consumer access line loss shouldcontinue to slow as FTTN matures

    Views IXC auction as a positive

    indication that Q is exploring value

    Jason Armstrongs Perception of Q:

    Intense revenue pressure

    - Large wholesale disconnects

    - Mass markets pressureintensified

    Unfavorable FTTN trajectory

    Unsuccessful IXC auction

    Perception Value Models

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    15/43

    1515

    Perception Value Sensitivity Analysis

    FCF 11.4x 11.6x 11.8x 12.0x 12.2x 12.4x 12.6x 12.8x 13.0x 13.2x 13.4x 13.6x 13.8x1,800$ 4.76$ 4.96$ 5.17$ 5.38$ 5.59$ 5.80$ 6.01$ 6.22$ 6.43$ 6.64$ 6.84$ 7.05$ 7.26$1,750$ 4.42$ 4.63$ 4.83$ 5.03$ 5.24$ 5.44$ 5.64$ 5.85$ 6.05$ 6.25$ 6.46$ 6.66$ 6.86$1,700$ 4.09$ 4.29$ 4.49$ 4.69$ 4.88$ 5.08$ 5.28$ 5.47$ 5.67$ 5.87$ 6.07$ 6.26$ 6.46$1,650$ 3.76$ 3.95$ 4.15$ 4.34$ 4.53$ 4.72$ 4.91$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.49$ 5.68$ 5.87$ 6.06$1,600$ 3.43$ 3.62$ 3.80$ 3.99$ 4.17$ 4.36$ 4.55$ 4.73$ 4.92$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.47$ 5.66$1,561$ 3.17$ 3.35$ 3.54$ 3.72$ 3.90$ 4.08$ 4.26$ 4.44$ 4.62$ 4.80$ 4.99$ 5.17$ 5.35$

    1,500$ 2.77$ 2.94$ 3.12$ 3.29$ 3.47$ 3.64$ 3.81$ 3.99$ 4.16$ 4.34$ 4.51$ 4.69$ 4.86$1,450$ 2.44$ 2.61$ 2.78$ 2.94$ 3.11$ 3.28$ 3.45$ 3.62$ 3.79$ 3.95$ 4.12$ 4.29$ 4.46$1,400$ 2.11$ 2.27$ 2.43$ 2.60$ 2.76$ 2.92$ 3.08$ 3.25$ 3.41$ 3.57$ 3.73$ 3.90$ 4.06$1,350$ 1.78$ 1.93$ 2.09$ 2.25$ 2.40$ 2.56$ 2.72$ 2.87$ 3.03$ 3.19$ 3.34$ 3.50$ 3.66$1,300$ 1.45$ 1.60$ 1.75$ 1.90$ 2.05$ 2.20$ 2.35$ 2.50$ 2.65$ 2.80$ 2.96$ 3.11$ 3.26$

    = August 2008 (H = $4.01, L = $3.43)

    Enterprise Perception Value Multiple

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    16/43

    1616

    Perception Value Sensitivity Analysis

    FCF 11.4x 11.6x 11.8x 12.0x 12.2x 12.4x 12.6x 12.8x 13.0x 13.2x 13.4x 13.6x 13.8x1,800$ 4.76$ 4.96$ 5.17$ 5.38$ 5.59$ 5.80$ 6.01$ 6.22$ 6.43$ 6.64$ 6.84$ 7.05$ 7.26$1,750$ 4.42$ 4.63$ 4.83$ 5.03$ 5.24$ 5.44$ 5.64$ 5.85$ 6.05$ 6.25$ 6.46$ 6.66$ 6.86$1,700$ 4.09$ 4.29$ 4.49$ 4.69$ 4.88$ 5.08$ 5.28$ 5.47$ 5.67$ 5.87$ 6.07$ 6.26$ 6.46$1,650$ 3.76$ 3.95$ 4.15$ 4.34$ 4.53$ 4.72$ 4.91$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.49$ 5.68$ 5.87$ 6.06$1,600$ 3.43$ 3.62$ 3.80$ 3.99$ 4.17$ 4.36$ 4.55$ 4.73$ 4.92$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.47$ 5.66$1,561$ 3.17$ 3.35$ 3.54$ 3.72$ 3.90$ 4.08$ 4.26$ 4.44$ 4.62$ 4.80$ 4.99$ 5.17$ 5.35$

    1,500$ 2.77$ 2.94$ 3.12$ 3.29$ 3.47$ 3.64$ 3.81$ 3.99$ 4.16$ 4.34$ 4.51$ 4.69$ 4.86$1,450$ 2.44$ 2.61$ 2.78$ 2.94$ 3.11$ 3.28$ 3.45$ 3.62$ 3.79$ 3.95$ 4.12$ 4.29$ 4.46$1,400$ 2.11$ 2.27$ 2.43$ 2.60$ 2.76$ 2.92$ 3.08$ 3.25$ 3.41$ 3.57$ 3.73$ 3.90$ 4.06$1,350$ 1.78$ 1.93$ 2.09$ 2.25$ 2.40$ 2.56$ 2.72$ 2.87$ 3.03$ 3.19$ 3.34$ 3.50$ 3.66$1,300$ 1.45$ 1.60$ 1.75$ 1.90$ 2.05$ 2.20$ 2.35$ 2.50$ 2.65$ 2.80$ 2.96$ 3.11$ 3.26$

    = August 2008 (H = $4.01, L = $3.43) = November 2008 (H = $3.38, L = $2.28)

    Enterprise Perception Value Multiple

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    17/43

    1717

    Perception Value Sensitivity Analysis

    FCF 11.4x 11.6x 11.8x 12.0x 12.2x 12.4x 12.6x 12.8x 13.0x 13.2x 13.4x 13.6x 13.8x1,800$ 4.76$ 4.96$ 5.17$ 5.38$ 5.59$ 5.80$ 6.01$ 6.22$ 6.43$ 6.64$ 6.84$ 7.05$ 7.26$1,750$ 4.42$ 4.63$ 4.83$ 5.03$ 5.24$ 5.44$ 5.64$ 5.85$ 6.05$ 6.25$ 6.46$ 6.66$ 6.86$1,700$ 4.09$ 4.29$ 4.49$ 4.69$ 4.88$ 5.08$ 5.28$ 5.47$ 5.67$ 5.87$ 6.07$ 6.26$ 6.46$1,650$ 3.76$ 3.95$ 4.15$ 4.34$ 4.53$ 4.72$ 4.91$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.49$ 5.68$ 5.87$ 6.06$1,600$ 3.43$ 3.62$ 3.80$ 3.99$ 4.17$ 4.36$ 4.55$ 4.73$ 4.92$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.47$ 5.66$1,561$ 3.17$ 3.35$ 3.54$ 3.72$ 3.90$ 4.08$ 4.26$ 4.44$ 4.62$ 4.80$ 4.99$ 5.17$ 5.35$

    1,500$ 2.77$ 2.94$ 3.12$ 3.29$ 3.47$ 3.64$ 3.81$ 3.99$ 4.16$ 4.34$ 4.51$ 4.69$ 4.86$1,450$ 2.44$ 2.61$ 2.78$ 2.94$ 3.11$ 3.28$ 3.45$ 3.62$ 3.79$ 3.95$ 4.12$ 4.29$ 4.46$1,400$ 2.11$ 2.27$ 2.43$ 2.60$ 2.76$ 2.92$ 3.08$ 3.25$ 3.41$ 3.57$ 3.73$ 3.90$ 4.06$1,350$ 1.78$ 1.93$ 2.09$ 2.25$ 2.40$ 2.56$ 2.72$ 2.87$ 3.03$ 3.19$ 3.34$ 3.50$ 3.66$1,300$ 1.45$ 1.60$ 1.75$ 1.90$ 2.05$ 2.20$ 2.35$ 2.50$ 2.65$ 2.80$ 2.96$ 3.11$ 3.26$

    = August 2008 (H = $4.01, L = $3.43) = November 2008 (H = $3.38, L = $2.28)

    = April 2009 (H = $4.06, L = $3.42)

    Enterprise Perception Value Multiple

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    18/43

    1818

    Perception Value Sensitivity Analysis

    FCF 11.4x 11.6x 11.8x 12.0x 12.2x 12.4x 12.6x 12.8x 13.0x 13.2x 13.4x 13.6x 13.8x1,800$ 4.76$ 4.96$ 5.17$ 5.38$ 5.59$ 5.80$ 6.01$ 6.22$ 6.43$ 6.64$ 6.84$ 7.05$ 7.26$1,750$ 4.42$ 4.63$ 4.83$ 5.03$ 5.24$ 5.44$ 5.64$ 5.85$ 6.05$ 6.25$ 6.46$ 6.66$ 6.86$1,700$ 4.09$ 4.29$ 4.49$ 4.69$ 4.88$ 5.08$ 5.28$ 5.47$ 5.67$ 5.87$ 6.07$ 6.26$ 6.46$1,650$ 3.76$ 3.95$ 4.15$ 4.34$ 4.53$ 4.72$ 4.91$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.49$ 5.68$ 5.87$ 6.06$1,600$ 3.43$ 3.62$ 3.80$ 3.99$ 4.17$ 4.36$ 4.55$ 4.73$ 4.92$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.47$ 5.66$1,561$ 3.17$ 3.35$ 3.54$ 3.72$ 3.90$ 4.08$ 4.26$ 4.44$ 4.62$ 4.80$ 4.99$ 5.17$ 5.35$

    1,500$ 2.77$ 2.94$ 3.12$ 3.29$ 3.47$ 3.64$ 3.81$ 3.99$ 4.16$ 4.34$ 4.51$ 4.69$ 4.86$1,450$ 2.44$ 2.61$ 2.78$ 2.94$ 3.11$ 3.28$ 3.45$ 3.62$ 3.79$ 3.95$ 4.12$ 4.29$ 4.46$1,400$ 2.11$ 2.27$ 2.43$ 2.60$ 2.76$ 2.92$ 3.08$ 3.25$ 3.41$ 3.57$ 3.73$ 3.90$ 4.06$1,350$ 1.78$ 1.93$ 2.09$ 2.25$ 2.40$ 2.56$ 2.72$ 2.87$ 3.03$ 3.19$ 3.34$ 3.50$ 3.66$1,300$ 1.45$ 1.60$ 1.75$ 1.90$ 2.05$ 2.20$ 2.35$ 2.50$ 2.65$ 2.80$ 2.96$ 3.11$ 3.26$

    = August 2008 (H = $4.01, L = $3.43) = November 2008 (H = $3.38, L = $2.28)

    = April 2009 (H = $4.06, L = $3.42) = September 2009 (H = $3.72, L = $3.34)

    Enterprise Perception Value Multiple

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    19/43

    19

    FCF 11.4x 11.6x 11.8x 12.0x 12.2x 12.4x 12.6x 12.8x 13.0x 13.2x 13.4x 13.6x 13.8x1,800$ 4.76$ 4.96$ 5.17$ 5.38$ 5.59$ 5.80$ 6.01$ 6.22$ 6.43$ 6.64$ 6.84$ 7.05$ 7.26$1,750$ 4.42$ 4.63$ 4.83$ 5.03$ 5.24$ 5.44$ 5.64$ 5.85$ 6.05$ 6.25$ 6.46$ 6.66$ 6.86$1,700$ 4.09$ 4.29$ 4.49$ 4.69$ 4.88$ 5.08$ 5.28$ 5.47$ 5.67$ 5.87$ 6.07$ 6.26$ 6.46$1,650$ 3.76$ 3.95$ 4.15$ 4.34$ 4.53$ 4.72$ 4.91$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.49$ 5.68$ 5.87$ 6.06$1,600$ 3.43$ 3.62$ 3.80$ 3.99$ 4.17$ 4.36$ 4.55$ 4.73$ 4.92$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.47$ 5.66$1,561$ 3.17$ 3.35$ 3.54$ 3.72$ 3.90$ 4.08$ 4.26$ 4.44$ 4.62$ 4.80$ 4.99$ 5.17$ 5.35$

    1,500$ 2.77$ 2.94$ 3.12$ 3.29$ 3.47$ 3.64$ 3.81$ 3.99$ 4.16$ 4.34$ 4.51$ 4.69$ 4.86$1,450$ 2.44$ 2.61$ 2.78$ 2.94$ 3.11$ 3.28$ 3.45$ 3.62$ 3.79$ 3.95$ 4.12$ 4.29$ 4.46$1,400$ 2.11$ 2.27$ 2.43$ 2.60$ 2.76$ 2.92$ 3.08$ 3.25$ 3.41$ 3.57$ 3.73$ 3.90$ 4.06$1,350$ 1.78$ 1.93$ 2.09$ 2.25$ 2.40$ 2.56$ 2.72$ 2.87$ 3.03$ 3.19$ 3.34$ 3.50$ 3.66$1,300$ 1.45$ 1.60$ 1.75$ 1.90$ 2.05$ 2.20$ 2.35$ 2.50$ 2.65$ 2.80$ 2.96$ 3.11$ 3.26$

    = August 2008 (H = $4.01, L = $3.43) = November 2008 (H = $3.38, L = $2.28)

    = April 2009 (H = $4.06, L = $3.42) = September 2009 (H = $3.72, L = $3.34)

    Enterprise Perception Value Multiple

    19

    Perception Value Sensitivity Analysis

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    20/43

    20

    FCF 11.4x 11.6x 11.8x 12.0x 12.2x 12.4x 12.6x 12.8x 13.0x 13.2x 13.4x 13.6x 13.8x

    1,800$ 4.76$ 4.96$ 5.17$ 5.38$ 5.59$ 5.80$ 6.01$ 6.22$ 6.43$ 6.64$ 6.84$ 7.05$ 7.26$1,750$ 4.42$ 4.63$ 4.83$ 5.03$ 5.24$ 5.44$ 5.64$ 5.85$ 6.05$ 6.25$ 6.46$ 6.66$ 6.86$

    1,700$ 4.09$ 4.29$ 4.49$ 4.69$ 4.88$ 5.08$ 5.28$ 5.47$ 5.67$ 5.87$ 6.07$ 6.26$ 6.46$

    1,650$ 3.76$ 3.95$ 4.15$ 4.34$ 4.53$ 4.72$ 4.91$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.49$ 5.68$ 5.87$ 6.06$

    1,600$ 3.43$ 3.62$ 3.80$ 3.99$ 4.17$ 4.36$ 4.55$ 4.73$ 4.92$ 5.10$ 5.29$ 5.47$ 5.66$

    1,561$ 3.17$ 3.35$ 3.54$ 3.72$ 3.90$ 4.08$ 4.26$ 4.44$ 4.62$ 4.80$ 4.99$ 5.17$ 5.35$

    1,500$ 2.77$ 2.94$ 3.12$ 3.29$ 3.47$ 3.64$ 3.81$ 3.99$ 4.16$ 4.34$ 4.51$ 4.69$ 4.86$

    1,450$ 2.44$ 2.61$ 2.78$ 2.94$ 3.11$ 3.28$ 3.45$ 3.62$ 3.79$ 3.95$ 4.12$ 4.29$ 4.46$1,400$ 2.11$ 2.27$ 2.43$ 2.60$ 2.76$ 2.92$ 3.08$ 3.25$ 3.41$ 3.57$ 3.73$ 3.90$ 4.06$

    1,350$ 1.78$ 1.93$ 2.09$ 2.25$ 2.40$ 2.56$ 2.72$ 2.87$ 3.03$ 3.19$ 3.34$ 3.50$ 3.66$

    1,300$ 1.45$ 1.60$ 1.75$ 1.90$ 2.05$ 2.20$ 2.35$ 2.50$ 2.65$ 2.80$ 2.96$ 3.11$ 3.26$

    = August 2008 (H = $4.01, L = $3.43) = November 2008 (H = $3.38, L = $2.28)

    = April 2009 (H = $4.06, L = $3.42) = September 2009 (H = $3.72, L = $3.34)

    Enterprise Perception Value Multiple

    20

    Perception Value Sensitivity Analysis

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    21/43

    2121

    Theoretically how share price is determined:Revenue OpEx = EBITDA

    EBITDA Capex Interest Working Capital = FCF

    FCF *Perception Value = Total Value

    Total Value Net Debt (Debt-Cash) = Equity Value

    Equity Value/Shares Outstanding = Share Price

    The value of a company is determined by itsexpected discounted Free Cash Flow

    *Perception Value - Shorthand metric to reflect the expected Discounted cashflows of a business, discount rate (including risk) and expected

    cash flows growth.

    Shareholder Value

    IncreasingShareholder

    Value

    Return onInvestment

    Capital

    WeightedAverage

    Cost of Capital

    SustainableFree Cash Flow

    Growth

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    22/43

    22

    Perfecting the Customer Experience

    Simplify our Focus to Drive Shareholder Value

    Execution

    RevenueAdministrative /

    OperatingExpense

    Capital Expectations

    Shareholder Value

    NewCustomers

    ExistingCustomers

    ARPU

    WalletShare

    AcquisitionCost

    ServiceCost

    FacilityCost

    SharedSupport

    3rd PartyPayments

    CapitalSpending

    PP&EEfficiency

    Working

    CapitalEfficiency

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    23/43

    23

    23

    Balanced Approach to Capital and

    Investing

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    24/43

    24

    Comparative Balance Sheet

    24

    QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.

    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(UNAUDITED)

    June 30, December 31,

    2009 2008

    (Dollars in millions)

    ASSETS

    Current assets:Cash and cash equivalents................................................................. 1,796$ 565$Other................................................................................................. 2,252 2,405

    Total current assets............................................................................... 4,048 2,970Property, plant and equipmentnet and other..................................... 16,178 17,171

    Total assets........................................................................................... 20,226$ 20,141$

    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

    Current liabilities:

    Current portion of long-term borrowings ......................................... 1,085$ 820$Accounts payable and other.............................................................. 2,703 3,033

    Total current liabilities......................................................................... 3,788 3,853Long-term borrowingsnet................................................................. 13,038 12,735Other..................................................................................................... 4,451 4,939

    Total liabilities..................................................................................... 21,277 21,527Stockholders' equity ............................................................................ (1,051) (1,386)

    Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.............................................. 20,226$ 20,141$

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    25/43

    25

    Balance Investment in Growth withReturns to the Shareholder

    2009 Investment and Return- $2.8B

    (estimated)In millions of dollars

    $1,700

    $549

    $528

    Capex Dividend Share Repurchase Debt Repurchase

    We started paying dividends in February 2008

    The first dividend paid since 2001 We announced a $2B stock buy back program in October 2006

    Repurchased $1.8B through December 2008 Still have authorization to buy $.2B

    We spent $1.8B in 2008 on CAPEX Estimated CAPEX is $1.7B or less in 2009

    25

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    26/43

    26

    $ in Millions

    Notes: Convertible notes shown as a maturity in 2010 given investors put rights

    $945 million un-drawn revolver matures in October 2010

    Paid down $562M QCF notes due August 3, 2009

    Information above excludes any potential pension funding starting in 2011

    2,168 2,151

    1,900

    3,389

    950

    Qwest Debt Maturity Schedule

    Unregulated QCIIandQCF(pay

    down)RegulatedQC(re-finance)

    26

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    27/43

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    28/43

    282828

    In the 90 day period between Nov. 2010 and Feb. 2011,

    Qwest has $2.6 Billion Debt Maturing (The Elephant)

    $2.6 Billion

    One Piece at a Time

    Combined with cash on hand and expected cash flow generation,

    we need to finance approximately $800 Million to finish the meal.

    = $.8 Billion

    So How Do You Eat an Elephant?

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    29/43

    29

    29

    September 2009 Bond Offering

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    30/43

    30

    $502 $505

    $680

    $799

    $517 $484$440

    $707

    $518

    03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11

    Capital Markets Seize Up

    High Yield Bonds ($ in billions)Upcoming Annual

    MaturitiesAnnual New Issuance

    Investment Grade Corporate (Non-Financial) Bonds($ in billions)

    Upcoming AnnualMaturities

    Source: CitiSource: Citi Syndicate

    $158

    $112

    $181

    $165

    $51$62

    $71

    $40

    $143

    03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11

    Annual New Issuance

    30

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    31/43

    31

    Qwest Yields and High Yield Market Issuance

    $0

    $2

    $4

    $6

    $8

    $10

    $12

    $14

    1/3/06 4/3/06 7/3/06 10/3/06 1/3/07 4/3/07 7/3/07 10/3/07 1/3/08 4/3/08 7/3/08 10/3/08 1/3/09 4/3/09 7/3/09

    6.0%

    8.0%

    10.0%

    12.0%

    14.0%

    16.0%

    18.0%

    20.0%

    22.0%

    Weekly HY Issuance YTW on QCII 7.5% Senior Notes due '14

    8.59%

    21.255%

    9/16/08Lehman files

    forbankruptcy

    3/9/09S&P 500

    2009 low

    Heightened LBO Activity

    Cheap Money unlikely to return to these

    levels Heavy issuance volume

    ($ in bn)

    Current yields are

    comparable to 2008(pre-Lehman) levels

    8/18/09

    S t b 14th Wh did Q t l h b d

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    32/43

    32

    September 14th Why did Qwest launch a bondoffering?

    Re-finance

    decision

    Now

    Later

    Pay rate

    as of 9-14

    (8.375%)1

    Opportunity cost -

    could have paid

    lower rate

    Payhigher rate

    (could be 20%+)

    Pay

    lower rate1

    Rates increase

    Rates increase

    Rates decrease

    Rates decrease

    1 Best rate issued since 2002 is in the low 7% range

    Financing Transaction

    On September 14th, Qwest launched and priced a $550m high yield bond offering

    Price of 98.244%, coupon of 8.0% and yield of 8.375%

    32

    S t b 14th Wh did Q t l h b d

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    33/43

    33

    September 14th Why did Qwest launch a bondoffering?

    Funding need Debt maturities in 2010/2011 that exceed FCF less dividends

    Improved market environment Equity and bond market were greatly improved

    S&P 500 up 54% from low of 676 on March 9, 2009 to 1,043 as of Sept. 11, 2009

    High yield market has also rallied (bond prices up and yields down) Qwests 7.5% note due 2014 trading yield improved to 8.2% (Sept.

    11) down from a high of approximately 20% in December 2008

    Decision Raise capital now or at a later date in 2009 or 2010

    Waiting = taking a position that interest rates will fall or remain flat Not waiting = protection against rising interest rates

    Chance to opportunistically re-finance a portion of funding requirement (dollar cost average) Cost is negative carry (the interest cost on new debt raised prior to the maturity of the old

    debt)

    33

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    34/43

    34

    34

    Asset Strategic Review

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    35/43

    35

    Introduction Opportunity

    Qwest Corporation 14-state Local Service Area

    Qwest POPs

    VoIP Deployed Cities

    Qwest Central Offices

    Qwest Communications International Inc. (QCII)

    Unregulated parent company traded on the NYSE Qwith a state-of-the-art nationwide fiber optic networkand advanced product offerings

    Regulated Regional Bell Operating Company (RBOC)telecom provider in 14 western states with asignificant customer base:

    Third largest local telephone company 10.9 million access lines 2.9 million high-speed Internet subscribers 853K video subscribers

    Potential Opportunity Qwest received an unsolicited inquiry from a

    company that was interested in purchasing assets

    (property plant & equipment, customers, revenueand employees)

    The assets in question were not a separate stand-alone business unit with financial statements

    1) As of Q2 2009

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    36/43

    36

    Unsolicited Offer for Assets - Summary

    Company receives an unsolicited offer from a buyer Corporate governance issues

    Board has a fiduciary duty to the shareholders to evaluate anacquisition proposal

    Internal and external counsel consulted

    Meetings with management, the board of directors andconsultants / advisors

    Comprehensive review of the assets and operations undertaken

    Decision to run competitive bidding process

    Outside advisors engaged to manage process Evolution of offers concluded the asset was more valuable to

    Qwest shareholders

    No disclosure requirement until an actual agreement is reached

    Identify the Specific Assets Due Diligence

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    37/43

    37

    Identify the Specific Assets Due DiligenceProcess

    Physical Assets Customer Assets Human Capital

    Detailed process toidentify specificallywhat physical assetsthe buyer wasinterested in

    For example: fiber in

    the ground from city Ato city B, etc.

    Detailed process to identifywhat customer contractsand revenues would beincluded in the sale

    Many lawyers reviewingcontracts

    Audited financial statementsneeded to be created

    Detailed process toidentify the employeesthat would be includedin the sale of assets

    Separation of relatedassets (e.g., real

    estate, PCs, e-mailnetworks, etc.)

    Goal is to determine what assets would be sold and, therefore, the cash flow stream that would be leavingthe company in exchange for a purchase price

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    38/43

    38

    Valuation Value to a Buyer of Assets

    NPV (net present value) of the cash flows discounted at the companys WACC (weighted average costof capital) is the value of purchasing the assets inclusive of synergy value

    2,0002,100

    2,2002,300

    2,400

    800900

    1,0001,100

    1,200

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

    Revenue FCF

    Asset Purchase

    Buyer will estimate futurecash flows

    Identification of synergiesis typically a significantvalue driver

    For example,elimination ofduplicative overhead

    Considerations

    Not actual numbers /For illustrative purposes only

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    39/43

    39

    Valuation Value of Retaining Assets

    NPV (net present value) of the cash flows discounted at the companys WACC (weighted average costof cost of capital) is the value of retaining the assets plus the avoided transaction costs and dis-synergies

    2,000

    2,200

    2,400

    2,600

    2,800

    1,0001,100

    1,2001,300

    1,400

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

    Revenue FCF

    Asset Sale

    Review of assets andoperations

    Sale of assets mayinvolve dis-synergies

    For example,

    corporate overheadallocated over asmaller revenue base

    Separation of assetsinvolves transaction costs

    Considerations

    Not actual numbers / For illustrative purposes only

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    40/43

    40

    Evaluation of the Purchase Offer

    ConsiderationExecution

    RiskFinancial Markets

    Risk

    Currency utilized could be: Cash

    Stock Debt Commercial agreements Combination of the above

    Terms & conditions of contract

    Time to close Impact to the business

    between announcementand closing Regulatory risk sale

    may be delayed orblocked by thegovernment

    Time and cost to extractthe assets (e.g., billing

    systems)

    Evaluation of the buyers

    ability to raise financing

    Shareholder perceptionof the offer Exposure on debt pricing

    A purchase proposal can be very simple or extremely complex

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    41/43

    41

    Conclusion

    Value of retaining the assets wasgreater than purchase price proposedby the buyer

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    42/43

    42

    Conclusion

    Qwest Completes Strategic Review of Long Distance Network Asset

    Company Reaffirms Full Year 2009 Guidance

    DENVER, June 8, 2009 Qwest Communications International Inc. (NYSE: Q) and its Board of Directors today announced the outcome of itsstrategic review of its long distance network asset.

    After receiving unsolicited indications of interest from potential purchasers of Qwest's long distance network asset, the company and its Board ofDirectors undertook a comprehensive review of this asset and its operations. Following this review, the company commenced a competitive biddingprocess. Although there was significant interest in this process from prospective buyers, the company and its Board of Directors have determined thatthe long distance network asset holds far more value to Qwest shareholders and is more strategically important to Qwest and its customers than isthe alternative of pursuing a transaction.

    Qwest reaffirms its guidance for the full year 2009, expecting adjusted free cash flow to be $1.4 to $1.5 billion, full year adjusted EBITDA of $4.2 to$4.4 billion, inclusive of an expected increase in non-cash pension and OPEB expense of $200 million, and capital expenditures of $1.8 billion orlower.

    Qwest remains confident in its outlook for 2009 and the ability of its business to continue to perform, said Edward A. Mueller, chairman and chiefexecutive officer of Qwest. At the same t ime, we are committed to taking steps that will benefit our shareholders, customers and employees in everydecision we make. We have always taken a disciplined, prudent approach to assessing our business in this ever changing industry. The review weconducted confirmed that our nationwide network is a tremendous asset and delivers best-in-class telecommunications services to businesses andgovernment agencies throughout the country. We are committed to serving those valued customers and remain focused on increasing shareholdervalue and perfecting the customer experience."

    Second Quarter 2009 Earnings Call

    The Company will announce its second quarter 2009 financial and operational highlights on Wednesday, July 29, 2009, at 7 a.m. EDT. Qwestmanagement will host a conference call at 9 a.m. EDT on the same day to discuss the companys perspective on the results and answer questions.

  • 7/29/2019 CU_10.7.09 Final

    43/43


Recommended