+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Current Status of Nuclear Power in Japan...Coal 32.3 LNG Oil 8.7 39.8 Nuclear 3.1 Hydro8 After 3.11...

Current Status of Nuclear Power in Japan...Coal 32.3 LNG Oil 8.7 39.8 Nuclear 3.1 Hydro8 After 3.11...

Date post: 09-Dec-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
20
Current Status of Nuclear Power in Japan Akihito UETAKE Senior Managing Director JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC. (JAIF) World Nuclear Association Symposium September 5, 2019 Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC
Transcript
  • Current Status of Nuclear Power in Japan

    Akihito UETAKESenior Managing Director

    JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC. (JAIF)

    World Nuclear Association SymposiumSeptember 5, 2019

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

  • JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC. (JAIF)

    • Established in March 1956

    • Chairman: Takashi IMAI (Honorary Chairman, NIPPON KEIDANREN)

    • JAIF’S Members: 400 members (as of Jun. 2019)

    • Mission: 原子力の平和利用(エネルギー、放射線利用)の推進

    • Major Activities Promotion of regional and public understanding Promotion of international cooperation Promotion of human resources securing and training

    1Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

  • 2

  • 33

  • 4Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

  • 5Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

  • 6

    A multi-purpose sports complex partially re-opened in 2018 summer (fully open in2019), featuring a stadium, 7 natural turf pitches, all-weather football practice field,400m track field, accommodation, banquet hall, fitness club, convention facilitiesand others.

    (URL: https://j-village.jp/)

    J-Village

    Source: Fukushima Pref.

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

    https://j-village.jp/

  • Coal

    32.3

    Oil 8.7LNG

    39.8

    Nuclear 3.1

    Hydro 8

    After 3.11Renewables 8.1

    Growing dependence on fossil fuel due to nuclear shut-down

    7

    Electricity Generation by Energy Source

    FY2010(1,150 TWh)

    Source: METI

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

    FY2017(1,060 TWh)

    Graph1

    Coal

    Oil

    LNG

    Nuclear

    Hydro

    Renewables

    Renewables 8.1

    After 3.11

    After 3.11

    32.3

    8.7

    39.8

    3.1

    8

    8.1

    Sheet1

    After 3.11

    Coal32.3

    Oil8.7

    LNG39.8

    Nuclear3.1

    Hydro8

    Renewables8.1

    グラフのデータ範囲の大きさを変更するには、範囲の右下隅をドラッグしてください。

    Graph1

    Coal

    Oil

    LNG

    Nuclear

    Hydro

    Renewables

    Renewables 2.3

    Before 3.11

    27.3

    8.8

    28.2

    25.9

    7.5

    2.3

    Sheet1

    Before 3.11

    Coal27.3

    Oil8.8

    LNG28.2

    Nuclear25.9

    Hydro7.5

    Renewables2.3

    グラフのデータ範囲の大きさを変更するには、範囲の右下隅をドラッグしてください。

  • Source: ANRE & METI, Sep 2015Updated by JICC

    Changes of Nuclear Power Generation Output in Japan

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC 8

  • Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

    Target of GHG Reduction and Electricity Generation

    2010 2013 2030Nuclear 29% 1% 20~22%

    Renewable* 10% 11% 22~24%

    Thermal 61% 88% 56%* Geothermal 1.7~4.6 %

    Biomass 3.7~4.6 %Wind 1.7 %Solar 7.0 %Hydro 8.8~9.2 %

    【Source】 The 11th Long-term Energy Supply and Demand Outlook Subcommittee, Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy, METI

    The 5th Strategic Energy Plan (SEP) (July 3, 2018) “Long-term Energy Supply and Demand Outlook”

    GHGs emissions reductionParis agreement commitment (by 2030)

    26% compared with 2013Long-term strategy (by 2050)

    80%

    9

  • Tokyo EPCOFukushima Daiichi

    Hokkaido EPCOTomari

    Tohoku EPCOOnagawa

    Chubu EPCOHamaoka

    JAPCTokai/Tokai Daini

    Tokyo EPCOKashiwazaki Kariwa

    Kyushu EPCOSendai

    Chugoku EPCOShimane

    Hokuriku EPCOShika

    JAPCTsuruga

    Kansai EPCOTakahama

    Kansai EPCOMihama

    Tohoku EPCOHigashidori

    Tokyo EPCOHigashidori

    Kyushu EPCOGenkai

    Kansai EPCOOhi

    Tokyo EPCOFukushima Daini

    J-POWEROhma

    138

    14

    8317

    139

    1107878787846

    17

    8454

    11033

    11028

    11025

    11024

    11028

    8934

    118

    8342

    5425

    36

    34 50

    56

    46

    11824

    11821

    8344

    8343

    8933

    13620

    PWR BWR ABWR

    Capacity(10MW)Age

    12 reactors

    Under NRA Review

    Shikoku EPCOIkata

    57 8924

    9 reactorsIn Operation

    24 reactors

    already decided toDecommission

    5829

    5827

    919

    12112

    11632

    11827

    11826

    8230

    911031

    8323

    11013

    138

    11425

    8734

    8733

    6 reactors

    Passed NRA Reviewfor the Permission for Changes in

    Reactor Installation

    Source: METI & JAIF

    118

    57

    110 110 110 110

    137

    Nuclear Power Plants in Japan

    *As of August 23, 2019

    13622

    13621

    52

    40

    110

    56

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC 10

  • 0

    100

    200

    300

    2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 2070

    Elec

    tric

    ity G

    ener

    atio

    n

    Year

    40 years

    60 years

    (TWh)

    Life Extension & Decommissioning

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

    Complied by JAIF

    Nuclear in Energy Mix 20%~22%

    11

  • Challenges

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

    新増設・リプレースに向けて

    (1) Industry’s Effort

    (2) Government Support

    -Energy Policy への反映(エネルギー基本計画)-電力自由化との整合性(長期投資回収措置)

    (3) Public Support

    12

  • Thank youfor your attention.

    Akihito UETAKEwww.jaif.or.jp/en/

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC 13

    http://www.jaif.or.jp/en/

  • Source: Nuclear Power Awareness Survey conducted by JAIF (Dec., 2018)

    Nuclear Power Awareness Survey

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

    On Utilization of Nuclear PowerArea covered: Japan nationwide (Major metropolitan cities) Target: Adults aged 18-69 Sample size: 3,800 Method: Internet survey

  • Atomic Energy Association (ATENA)Society

    (incl. local municipalities &

    gov’t)

    ②Dialogue

    NPP NPP NPP

    Performing safety measures

    Nuclear Regulation Authority

    Regulations

    Vendors JEMA* JAIFFEPC

    *CRIEPI*

    JANSI*

    Atomic Energy Association①

    Promoting safety

    measures

    ③ Communication for safety enhancements

    Experts (both domestic & international)

    Participation (utilizing available sources)

    Nuclear Industry

    Opinionexchange

    Evaluation/SupportCooperation

    Nuclear operators

    *JANSI: Japan Nuclear Safety InstituteJEMA: Japan Electrical Manufacturers’ AssociationFEPC: Federation of Electric Power CompaniesCRIEPI: Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry

    Source: ATENA HP

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

  • Decreasing Students’ Interest and Increasing Manpower Needs

    200 240525

    755

    1256

    223 265 225 250 188 304 259 213

    361

    647

    273 123 195 143149

    138 124 126200240

    525

    1116

    1903

    496388 420 393 337

    442383 339

    25

    32

    45

    60

    65

    53

    3437

    47

    5559

    72

    80

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    0

    1000

    2000

    2006年度

    2007年度

    2008年度

    2009年度

    2010年度

    2011年度

    2012年度

    2013年度

    2014年度

    2015年度

    2016年度

    2017年度

    2018年度

    大阪会場来場数(人)

    東京会場来場数(人)

    参加企業・機関数(延べ)

    Fiscal Year

    Numbers of companies

    # of students -Tokyo

    # of students -Osaka

    # of companies

    <人材育成における課題>

    現場の活用(稼働プラントによる実機体感研修など)

    若年層、社会からの原子力に対する支持、理解の獲得

    産官学連携の深化(ニーズや課題を共有し、最適化を図りながら戦略的に取り組む)

    Numbers of students

    Companies

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

  • Source: METI

    Overview of Water Management

    *ALPS stands for Multiple facilities including a Multi-nuclide Removal Facility (Advanced Liquid Processing System = ALPS)

  • Reference Values for Cesium Concentration in Foods

    Note: As seen in the next slide, the assumptions for calculating reference values vary; thus the reference values can be quite different and are not directly comparable.

    ※ An intergovernmental organization issuing international food standards (Codex Standards), established in 1963 by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization (WHO) of the United Nations.

    Japan(2012.4-)

    Codex AlimentariousCommission※

    EU (Products distributed within the EU)

    U.S.A.

    Drinking water 10 1000 1000 1200

    Milk 50 1000 1000 1200

    General food 100 1000 1250 1200

    Baby food 50 1000 400 1200

    [Unit: Bq/kg]

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

    Source: Basic Information on Radiation Risk, Cabinet Office, Et Al. (February 2016)

    食品中の放射性物質の基準値

  • Implemented on July 8, 2013

    Improved Safety MeasuresExternal power supply enhancement

    Water supply vehicle

    Portable pump

    Source: Chubu EPC

    Portable power supply vehicle

    Investigation of active faults

    Seawall against tsunamis

    Watertight door against flooding

    Filter vent (PWR: to be used 5 yrs later)

    Use of fire resistant cables and multiplexing piping

    Wheel loader (for removing debris)

    Specific safety facilities(to be used 5 yrs later)- Emergency control room- Power, water supplies, etc.

    ReactorBuilding

    Setting of standard for tsunamis

    Copyright © JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC

    スライド番号 1JAPAN ATOMIC INDUSTRIAL FORUM, INC. (JAIF)スライド番号 3スライド番号 4スライド番号 5スライド番号 6J-Villageスライド番号 8スライド番号 9スライド番号 10スライド番号 11スライド番号 12スライド番号 13スライド番号 14スライド番号 15スライド番号 16Decreasing Students’ Interest and Increasing Manpower Needsスライド番号 1スライド番号 2スライド番号 3


Recommended