Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 1
Current Telemetry Dashboards
NDSWG
May 19, 2009
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 2
QSE Telemetry (as of 04/30/09)
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 3
TDSP Telemetry (as of 04/30/09)
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 4
Load Observability (as of 04/30/09)
Lead from the frontTexas Nodal
State Estimator Convergence Rate – April 2009
http://nodal.ercot.com 5
2009 Monthly Convergence %
Jan 2009 - 80.27% Feb 2009 - 69.88% Mar 2009 - 89.49% Apr 2009 – 85.70%
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 6
State Estimator Convergence Rate – February 2009 – April 2009
State Estimator Convergence: February – April 2009
2009 Monthly Convergence %
Jan 2009 - 80.27% Feb 2009 - 69.88% Mar 2009 - 89.49% Apr 2009 – 85.70%
Lead from the frontTexas Nodal
Key Numbers 91% Test Average Convergence; 100% for 8 of 27 Test Hours Primary issues affecting overall test included manual replacements
to address Zonal-Nodal mismatches On Day One, convergence dipped at HE 1100 from an ICCP link
going down and dipped again at HE 1400 owing to output data not currently telemetered to nodal (manual replacements to be made until nodal telemetry is running)
On Day Two, convergence started low owing to missing ICCP tags for several data points. ANA is communicating with MPs to address the issues and will do manual replacements until the tags are operable. Otherwise, the expected zonal-nodal mismatches kept convergence hovering at ≥92% for remaining test hours.
On Day Three, a replay of manual replacements from Day Two kept convergence at ≥92% for most test hours and at 96% for the day.
http://nodal.ercot.com 7
FIT III Assessment reports will be posted at: http://nodal.ercot.com/readiness/eds3/documents/index.html
Focused Input Testing (FIT) III, Week 5 – State Estimator
Lead from the frontTexas Nodal
Key Numbers 93.56% Test Average Convergence; 100% for 13 of 27 Test Hours On Day One, zonal-nodal mismatches and telemetry losses caused
convergence to dip below 90% for Hour Ending (HE) 0900 and HE 1200; convergence achieved 92% or better for all remaining test hours for the day
On Day Two, an ICCP link went down during HE 1400, causing convergence to dip to 73% for the hour; convergence achieved 92% or better for all remaining test hours for the day
On Day Three, An ICCP link went down during HE 1500, causing convergence to dip to 64% for the hour; zonal-nodal mismatches affected HE 1500 with an 86% convergence for the hour; convergence achieved 92% or better for all remaining test hours for the day
Overall, the majority of issues affecting convergence during testing hours were due to mismatches between zonal and nodal telemetry
http://nodal.ercot.com 8
FIT III Assessment reports will be posted at: http://nodal.ercot.com/readiness/eds3/documents/index.html
FIT III, Week 6 – State Estimator
Lead from the frontTexas NodalLFC04/20/23
FIT Series
Week Date Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Average Convergence % for all Test
Hours
100% Convergence Achieved
FIT II Week 1 Oct. 21 – 23, 2008 90.18 74.16 91.83 85.39 12 of 27 hrs
Week 2 Nov. 04 – 06, 2008 88.17 96.58 97.11 93.95 18 of 27 hrs
Week 3 Nov. 18 – 20, 2008 87.17 84.19 82.91 84.76 12 of 27 hrs
Week 4 Dec. 02 – 04, 2008 96.04 93.33 93.44 94.27 14 of 27 hrs
Week 5 Dec. 16 – 18, 2008 94.74 97.49 96.30 96.18 19 of 27 hrs
Week 6 Jan. 13 – 15, 2009 96.00 94.12 95.78 95.30 15 of 27 hrs
Week 7 Jan. 27 – 29, 2009 94.07 90.13 93.29 92.49 14 of 27 hrs
FIT III
Week 1 Feb. 24 – 26, 2009 75.45 78.86 92.85 82.39 09 of 27 hrs
Week 2 Mar. 10 – 12, 2009 96.82 92.97 98.41 96.07 20 of 27 hrs
Week 3 Mar. 24 - 26, 2009 85.45 94.98 94.70 91.71 14 of 27 hrs
Week 4 Apr. 07 - 09, 2009 97.13 92.60 97.44 95.72 21 of 27 hrs
Week 5 Apr. 21 – 23, 2009 87.47 89.87 95.65 91.00 8 of 27 hrs
Week 6 May 5 – 7, 2009 94.34 94.47 91.87 93.56 13 of 27 hrs
Trends – FIT II & FIT III
9
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 10
Appendix: Telemetry & State Estimator
Overview of Reports, Processes, and Data
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 11
ICCP
• Telemetry Support• Telemetry Reporting• State Estimator Tuning• New Telemetry Point Addition Process• Telemetry Issue Process• Current Telemetry Status• Telemetry Status Whereabouts
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 12
Telemetry Support
• ERCOT Full Time Staff ICCP Support– Advanced Network Applications Support 2 Engineers– Control Room 1 Operations Analyst & 1 Shift Engineer– IT 2 System Analysts– Additional Staff on a part time basis
• Market Participants– Contact for Nodal Issues– Timely Response on detected issues
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 13
Telemetry Dashboards
FIT II & FIT III Assessment reports are posted at: http://nodal.ercot.com/readiness/eds3/documents/index.html
• The following Telemetry Dashboards are being posted on the Readiness Center:– Observability– QSER & TDSP Telemetry
• The link for these dashboards is:
http://nodal.ercot.com/readiness/eds1/documents/index.html
• These dashboards are currently being posted monthly following each mid-month Nodal database update.
• Report questions can be sent to [email protected]
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 14
Telemetry Dashboards
TelemetryDashboards
}
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 15
Telemetry Reporting – QSER/TDSP Dashboard
QSER & TDSP Dashboard
Questions may be sent to: [email protected]
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 16
Telemetry Reporting – Observability Dashboard
The number of unobservable buses in the system with all pseudo measurement removed.
The number of current unobservable buses in the system that have a load at the station where
telemetry is required to make the bus observable.
Buses that are unobservable due to a PUN load at the station.
If a number other then 0 is in column B, then there is missing telemetry which requires Market Participant Corrective Action.
Questions may be sent to: [email protected]
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 17
Telemetry Reporting
State Estimator (SE) Convergence
• SE & Supporting Telemetry Information is posted on EDW MIS The link is: https://nodaleds.ercot.com/pps/tibco/mis/Pages/Market+Information/
Real+Time+Market • Advanced Network Applications
provides analysis assistance and be reached at the EDS2 email: [email protected]
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 18
SE Convergence Supporting Information on EDW MIS
Click on More State Estimator
Reports and Extracts
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 19
SE Convergence Supporting Information on EDW MIS
Click on More State
Estimator Convergence Rate Reports
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 20
State Estimator Tuning
• FIT– Monitors Telemetry– Compares Generation between Zonal & Nodal
• ICCP Support Team– Analysis Support of FIT Issues– ICCP Issue Resolution Support– Produce FIT Report
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 21
FIT Telemetry Reporting
FIT Report• Log of Events & Observations
– The daily logs published in the bi-weekly FIT Reports provide a window into the types of issues that affect convergence during FIT testing hours.
• FIT Reports are posted at: http://nodal.ercot.com/readiness/eds3/documents/index.html
Questions can be sent to [email protected]
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 22
New Telemetry Point Addition Process
MP (QSER or TSP) has new ICCP point to
activate
MP Consults ICCP Handbook to
determine data point names
MP fills out ICCP Change Request Form
MP creates a Service Request via the Texas
Market Link on ERCOT.com
MP attaches completed ICCP
Change Request form to Service Request
ERCOT ICCP Team receives and
processes each Service Request
No
ERCOT ICCP Team contacts MP to confirm the changes
ERCOT ICCP Team notifies the MP
upon completion of the Service Request
Service Request Issues?
Yes
ERCOT ICCP Team makes changes to
ICCP
No
MP has submitted & completed
Model Change
ICCP Standards Questions?
Yes
Lead from the frontTexas Nodalhttp://nodal.ercot.com 23
Current Telemetry Issue Process
ERCOT or Market Participant detects Telemetry, ICCP or other System Issue
Market Participant investigates to
determine correct ability
Requires ERCOT assistance to
resolve?
Contact ERCOT ANA by email
[email protected] for assistance
Yes
No
ERCOT Analyzes Issue and determines
corrective action
ERCOT Contacts MP to Affect Correction
Issue Resolved?
Done
Yes
NoMP Corrects Issue
During FIT? No
Yes
Contact ERCOT Shift Engineer @
512-248-6345