+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CV Update Newsletter v11n4 2013 - MC5234-0114

CV Update Newsletter v11n4 2013 - MC5234-0114

Date post: 14-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
9
INSIDE THIS ISSUE Mayo Clinic Investigators Identify Mortality Risk Factors in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Largest Non-Asian Clinical Population to Date IN THE NEWS Mayo Clinic Study Suggests ICDs and Pacemakers Not Affected By Hybrid Cars Mayo Clinic Hospitals Included in Top Hospitals for Heart Care Mayo Clinic a Top Hospital for Hispanics $10 Million Gift Honors Cardiophysiology Pioneer Earl H. Wood, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic Children's Center is First Accredited Pediatric Heart Failure Institute in Midwest and Fourth in Nation Role of Cardiac MRI in the Assessment of Cardiac Amyloidosis Robotic Mitral Valve Repair is a Cost- Effective Treatment Compared With Standard Approach 10 Minutes With David R. Holmes Jr., MD 2 4 5 4 6 7 Cardiovascular U pdate Cardiology, Pediatric Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Surgery News Vol. 11, No. 4, 2013 Colleagues, The introduction of electrocardiography in 1914 marked the beginning of the modern era of car- diology at Mayo Clinic. The machine was ordered in 1912, but due to the time it took to manu- facture, assemble, and ship, it did not arrive for 2 years. Later, Fredrick A. Willius, MD, who had recently completed the Mayo Clinic graduate training program, was hired as the first physician with a special interest in cardiovascular disease. Dr Willius established the electrocardiography Issam D. Moussa, MD; Charanjit S. Rihal, MD, MBA; Win-Kuang Shen, MD Celebrating 100 Years of Cardiology at Mayo Clinic First Cambridge electrocardiograph delivered to Mayo Clinic in 1914. laboratory in 1917, and in 1922 was asked to chair a new section of cardiology at Mayo Clinic. In the intervening 100 years, amazing devel- opments in the understanding and treatment of heart disease in all of its manifestations have oc- curred. We are proud of the many contributions by Mayo Clinic cardiology and cardiovascular sur- gery staff to the field of cardiovascular diseases. In the upcoming year, we will share some of the highlights of the past 100 years. We remain com- mitted to our mission of excellence by providing unsurpassed care to every patient through inte- grated practice, education, and research. Charanjit S. Rihal, MD, MBA Chair, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota Win-Kuang Shen, MD Chair, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic in Phoenix/Scottsdale, Arizona Issam D. Moussa, MD Chair, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida
Transcript

INSIDE THIS ISSUE

Mayo Clinic Investigators Identify Mortality Risk Factors in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Largest Non-Asian Clinical Population to Date

IN THE NEWSMayo Clinic Study Suggests ICDs and Pacemakers Not Affected By Hybrid Cars

Mayo Clinic Hospitals Included in Top Hospitals for Heart Care

Mayo Clinic a Top Hospital for Hispanics

$10 Million Gift Honors Cardiophysiology Pioneer Earl H. Wood, MD, PhD

Mayo Clinic Children's Center is First Accredited Pediatric Heart Failure Institute in Midwest and Fourth in Nation

Role of Cardiac MRI in the Assessment of Cardiac Amyloidosis

Robotic Mitral Valve Repair is a Cost- Effective Treatment Compared With Standard Approach

10 Minutes With David R. Holmes Jr., MD

2

4 5

46

7

CardiovascularUpdateCardiology, Pediatric Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Surgery News Vol. 11, No. 4, 2013

Colleagues,

The introduction of electrocardiography in 1914 marked the beginning of the modern era of car-diology at Mayo Clinic. The machine was ordered in 1912, but due to the time it took to manu-facture, assemble, and ship, it did not arrive for 2 years. Later, Fredrick A. Willius, MD, who had recently completed the Mayo Clinic graduate training program, was hired as the first physician with a special interest in cardiovascular disease. Dr Willius established the electrocardiography

Issam D. Moussa, MD; Charanjit S. Rihal, MD, MBA; Win-Kuang Shen, MD

Celebrating 100 Years of Cardiology at Mayo Clinic

First Cambridge electrocardiograph delivered to Mayo Clinic in 1914.

laboratory in 1917, and in 1922 was asked to chair a new section of cardiology at Mayo Clinic. In the intervening 100 years, amazing devel-opments in the understanding and treatment of heart disease in all of its manifestations have oc-curred. We are proud of the many contributions by Mayo Clinic cardiology and cardiovascular sur-gery staff to the field of cardiovascular diseases. In the upcoming year, we will share some of the highlights of the past 100 years. We remain com-mitted to our mission of excellence by providing unsurpassed care to every patient through inte-grated practice, education, and research.

Charanjit S. Rihal, MD, MBAChair, Division of Cardiovascular DiseasesMayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota

Win-Kuang Shen, MDChair, Division of Cardiovascular DiseasesMayo Clinic in Phoenix/Scottsdale, Arizona

Issam D. Moussa, MDChair, Division of Cardiovascular DiseasesMayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida

2 MAYO CLINIC | CardiovascularUpdate

The apical variant of hypertrophic cardiomy-opathy (HCM) accounts for approximately 25% of the total HCM population in Asians and less than 10% in non-Asians. It is an au-tosomal dominant genetic disease with vari-able phenotypic penetrance. Studies in Asian populations suggest that it has a more benign prognosis than other types of HCM. Data in non-Asian populations is limited, but small studies suggest that the prognostic implica-tions of apical HCM may be more severe in this group than in affected Asian individuals. A review of the comprehensive Mayo Clinic HCM and echocardiographic databases was conducted by Kyle W. Klarich, MD, car-diologist and director of the Cardiovascular Graduate Training Program at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, and published in 2013 in the American Journal of Cardiology. She and her colleagues retrospectively identified 2662 in-dividuals with HCM evaluated at Mayo Clinic between June 1976 and September 2006. Of these individuals, 193 patients (7.3%) without confounding factors were classified as apical HCM, and follow-up was obtained in 187 of them (114 men, mean age 62 ± 19 years; 73 women, mean age 66 ± 16 years). Mean dura-tion of follow-up was 94 ± 76 months.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ClinicMayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota

Steve R. Ommen, MD, Director

CardiologyMichael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD*William K. Freeman, MDBernard J. Gersh, MB, ChB, DPhilKyle W. Klarich, MDRick A. Nishimura, MD

Cardiovascular SurgeryJoseph A. Dearani, MDHartzell V. Schaff, MD

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Clinic Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Christopher P. Appleton, MDKrishnaswamy Chandrasekaran, MDSteven J. Lester, MDSusan Wilansky, MD

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Clinic Mayo Clinic in Florida

Joseph L. Blackshear, MDRobert E. Safford, MD, PhDBrian P. Shapiro, MD*Pediatric Cardiology

There were 55 deaths; 21 had noncardiac causes, 27 were from unknown causes, and 7 were of cardiac etiol-ogy. While Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the observed overall survival of this group of North American patients was significantly worse than expected, this find-ing was entirely due to excess mortality in women (Fig-ure). Survival in men with apical HCM was almost iden-tical to age-matched controls. Multivariate predictors of increased mortality included female sex, age at first visit, chronic atrial fibrillation, and history of stroke.

Mayo Clinic Investigators Identify Mortality Risk Factors in Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Largest Non-Asian Clinical Population to Date

Kyle W. Klarich, MD

Figure. Kaplan-Meier survival curves. A. 10- and 20-year survival in all patients.B. Survival in men with apical HCM was equivalent to age- and sex-matched controls.C. Survival in women with apical HCM was significantly worse than age- and sex-matched controls.

P=0.001

ExpectedObserved

100 –

80 –

60 –

40 –

20 –

0 –l l l l l0 5 10 15 20

Surv

ival

(%

)

P=0.41

100 –

80 –

60 –

40 –

20 –

0 –l l l l l0 5 10 15 20

Years

P<0.001

100 –

80 –

60 –

40 –

20 –

0 –l l l l l0 5 10 15 20

A

B

C

Surv

ival

(%

)Su

rviv

al (

%)

(Reproduced with permission from American Journal of Cardiology 2013;111:1784-1791.)

MAYO CLINIC | CardiovascularUpdate 3

Mayo Clinic Children's Center is First Accredited Pediatric Heart Failure Institute in Midwest and Fourth in Nation On October 1, 2013, the Healthcare Accreditation Colloquium announced that Mayo Clinic Children's Center had become the first accredited Pediatric Heart Failure Institute in the Midwest and only the fourth in the nation. This accreditation was given based on a rigorous process focused on quality improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric heart failure within the hospital, community, clinician, and science domains. The process was led by Jonathan N. Johnson, MD, pediatric cardiologist at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, and Ms. Sonja H. Dahl, RN, CNP. With the backing of the Healthcare Accreditation Colloquium and its member hospitals, Mayo Clinic Children's Center will seek to continually improve outcomes for this challenging group of patients and promote the Mayo Clinic legacy of "The needs of the patient come first." To learn more about Mayo Clinic Children's Center, visit http://www.mayoclinic.org/pediatrics. To learn more about Accredited Pediatric Heart Failure Institutes, visit http://colloqui-umhealth.com/who-we-are/?post=1275.

I N T H E N E W SMayo Clinic Hospitals Included in Top Hospitals for Heart CareMayo Clinic Hospital in Phoenix, Arizona, and Mayo Clinic Hospital, Saint Marys Campus, in Rochester, Minnesota, have both been named to Truven Health Analytics' list of 2014 Top 50 U.S. Hospitals for Heart Care. Hospitals were scored in key areas of performance, such as risk-adjusted mortality and complications, core measures, 30-day mortality and readmission rates, severity-adjusted average length of stay, and severity-adjusted average cost. Top 50 hospitals spent approximately $2,000 less per bypass surgery and $1,000 less per patient with myocardial infarction. Top hospitals award winners demonstrate top performance on both clinical care and business efficiency.

Mayo Clinic a Top Hospital for HispanicsMayo Clinic was named to the list of Top Hospitals for Hispanics by DiversityComm, Inc, as reported in Hispanic Network Magazine. Important criteria included outreach and acces-sibility to Hispanic and Latino populations. Mayo Clinic recently launched "Historias Mayo," a video series focused on Hispanic and Latino patient and physician stories, on its redesigned Spanish-language website (http://www.mayoclinic.org/espanol/). Additionally, Mayo Clinic has created Spanish social media communities on Twitter (@ClinicaMayo) and Facebook (www.facebook.com/MayoClinicEspanol), and the Mayo Clinic YouTube channel includes an "En español" playlist. Mayo Clinic operates Representative Of-fices in Mexico, Guatemala, Ecuador, and Colombia. Nearly 300 physicians at Mayo Clinic's campuses in Rochester, Florida, and Arizona are Spanish-speaking.

$10 Million Gift Honors Cardiophysiology Pioneer Earl H. Wood, MD, PhDMayo Clinic in Rochester received a $10 million gift from an anonymous Mayo Clinic alum-nus to honor his late mentor and friend, Earl H. Wood, MD, PhD, for his illustrious career as a pioneer in cardiophysiology. This gift establishes the Earl H. Wood, MD, PhD, Career Development Award in Cardiovascular Diseases Research and the Earl H. Wood, MD, PhD, Fund for Cardiovascular Diseases Research. Dr Wood joined Mayo Clinic in 1942. As a physiologist, Dr Wood helped develop the invasive cardiac physiology laboratory. He was part of the team charged with helping mili-tary air crews survive the physical stresses of flying. The team tested G-forces in a human centrifuge, designed the famous G-suit, and developed the M1 maneuver for use by pilots to avoid blacking out in high G-force situations. Dr Wood studied and refined techniques for measuring blood flow within and to the heart that helped to pave the way for cardiac catheterization. He received a patent for the oximeter, a noninvasive tool used to measure oxygen levels, and helped develop a light-absorbing green dye, indocyanine, used in diagnosing cardiac shunts. He pioneered techniques for left and right heart catheterization, often using direct puncture. His work led directly to the modern diagnostic and therapeutic catheterization laboratory that has treated tens of thousands of people at Mayo Clinic.

"The increased mortality observed in women with apical HCM is likely due to older age at first visit and the presence of chronic atrial fibrillation. The mortality rate approaches what has been reported for other HCM phenotypes," says Dr Klarich. "However, as with other cardiovascular diseases, we do not yet understand the role of hormonal and other sex-specific factors that may affect phenotypic onset, expression, and progression of this disease." Genetic testing for and analysis of sarcomeric mu-tations characteristic in HCM were not routinely per-formed in these patients, so mutational correlation could not be performed. While cardiac MRI is currently the preferred imaging modality for assessing both apical wall thickness and the presence of an apical pouch (al-though echocardiographic detection of apical pouch can be improved by contrast imaging) in these patients, this technology was introduced after the time frame included in this study and therefore not included in this analysis. "Unfortunately, to date, genetic mutations in isola-tion are not reliable prognostic predictors," says Dr Klar-ich. "As our understanding of the role of environmental and other genetic factors on mutational gene expression expands, we hope to better predict and improve out-comes for this group of patients." This study suggests that apical HCM has different prognostic implications for affected women than affected men. The finding that the excess mortality in women is responsible for decreased survival in North Americans with apical HCM will help to focus future investigations.

I N T H E N E W SMayo Clinic Study Suggests ICDs and Pacemak-ers Not Affected By Hybrid Cars

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) in the environment can have deleterious effects on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and pacemaker function. Little is known about the effect on device func-tion by EMI generated by hybrid cars, although a study reported by cardiologists from Mayo Clinic in Arizona and presented at the 2013 Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology has shed some light on the topic. The authors enrolled 30 patients with ICDs from 3 major United States device manufacturers, and EMI was measured from 6 locations (the driver seat, front passenger seat, right and left back seats, and outside at the back and front of the car) in a 2012 Toyota Prius hybrid. Each position was evaluated at variable speeds of acceleration and deceleration; 7,800 data points were acquired per patient dur-ing continuous monitoring. The levels of EMI generated at all speeds and locations within the car were below the recommended thresh-old, and there were no episodes of oversensing or programming changes after exposure. This is the first study to address this issue using an in vivo model, and the results suggest that hybrid cars do not generate clinically relevant amounts of EMI. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the interaction between ICDs and other models of hybrid cars or exclusively electric cars.

4 MAYO CLINIC | CardiovascularUpdate

Role of Cardiac MRI in the Assessment of Cardiac Amyloidosis

Amyloidosis is caused by extracellular deposition of autologous protein that is laid in a conforma-tion described as beta-pleated sheets and known as amyloid fibrils. Cardiac amyloidosis is a clini-cal condition in which the cardiac structures are infiltrated by beta-amyloid protein, leading to a constellation of findings on history, physical ex-amination, and cardiac imaging. The protein that is deposited has varied subtypes, with each having its own natural history. Amyloid deposition typi-cally occurs in a uniform pattern, but certain vari-ants may show a more patchy involvement. These proteins are deposited in the interstitial space and on biopsy, which remains the current gold standard of diagnosis, amyloid fibrils bind Congo red stain, yielding apple-green bifringence under cross-po-larized light microscopy. Noninvasive imaging features of cardiac amy-loidosis are generally sufficient to detect or at least suspect the diagnosis, and cardiac MRI has an emerging role in diagnostic evaluation. It is impor-tant, however, to note that the diagnosis is based upon the integration of several clinical features and basic testing, including laboratory testing and elec-trocardiogram, that leads to the clinical suspicion of the disease. Cardiac imaging is typically performed in pa-tients with known systemic amyloidosis presenting with cardiac symptoms or signs. Echocardiography is usually the first cardiac imaging test performed, typically because it is more widely available, porta-ble, and affordable; has robust and well-established techniques to measure diastolic function, which is the most important physiologic abnormality in car-diac amyloidosis; and has developed newer appli-cations such as strain imaging. Cardiac MRI is, however, emerging as a first-line modality or at least a complementary imag-ing modality in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis, specifically with regard to its supe-rior ability to characterize the myocardial tissue on postcontrast myocardial delayed enhancement sequences. A comprehensive assessment of cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac MRI requires tailored, flexible imaging protocols to complement other clinical information. Cardiac MRI has shown con-siderable promise in the diagnostic evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis. Cardiac morphologic features are evaluated using steady-state free precession sequences. This particular sequence allows visualization of both cardiac structure and function. Images of the heart are taken throughout the cardiac cycle, affording the ability to determine cardiac volumes and ejec-tion fraction. Similarly, the myocardial thickness

Nandan S. Anavekar, MB, BCh

Integrative Cardiovascular ImagingMayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota

Eric E. Williamson, MD, DirectorNandan S. Anavekar, MB, BChPhilip A. Araoz, MDJerome F. Breen, MDThomas A. Foley, MDJames Glockner, MD, PhDPaul R. Julsrud, MDRonald S. Kuzo, MDDarin White, MDPhillip M. Young, MD

Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Mayo Clinic in Florida

Brian P. Shapiro, MD, DirectorJoseph L. Blackshear, MDRobert E. Safford, MD, PhD

Figure 1. Myocardial delayed enhancement sequence. Note the "nulling" characteristic of the normal myocardium, which appears dark on the se-quence.

Figure 2. Myocardial delayed enhancement sequence in a patient with car-diac amyloidosis. Note the abnormal, diffuse enhancement; this finding is characteristic of infiltrative cardiomyopathies.

LV

RV

LV

RV

MAYO CLINIC | CardiovascularUpdate 5

can be assessed, including both ventricular and atrial wall and interatrial septal thickness. These findings in the setting of low-voltage electrocardiogram should raise the suspicion of the di-agnosis. The ability to image the heart in any plane is one of the major advantages over traditional echocardiographic assessment, which may be limited by the available acoustic windows. The steady-state free precession sequence is also useful in the identification of pericardial and pleural effusions, which may be accompanying findings. Impaired diastolic function may also be apparent and, similar to the Doppler echocardiographic assess-ment of diastolic function, mitral inflow measurements can be obtained using cine phase-contrast pulse sequences. One of the utilities of cardiac MRI that makes it an attractive imaging modality in patients with cardiac amyloidosis is its abil-ity to characterize abnormalities in the tissue structure. In order to achieve this goal, though, intravenous administration of gad-olinium contrast is necessary. This becomes an important con-sideration when selecting a patient for cardiac MRI. The major factor precluding the use of intravenous gadolinium contrast is the presence of significant renal dysfunction; at Mayo Clinic, we use a cutoff for glomerular filtration rate of 30 mL/min/BSA, and those above this threshold are considered candidates for contrast administration. This becomes a particularly important consider-ation in patients with amyloidosis, as these patients may com-monly be afflicted by significant renal dysfunction. After administration of contrast medium, there are often striking abnormalities of myocardial tissue characteristics that are seen on myocardial delayed enhancement pulse sequences. Pa-tients with cardiac amyloidosis typically demonstrate diffuse and irregular hyperenhancement of the myocardium. The hyperen-hancement pattern may be circumferential and subendocardial in distribution but is quite variable. Right ventricular involvement may also be apparent on these sequences. The delayed enhance-ment sequence can also be useful in the identification of intracar-diac thrombus, particularly intra-atrial thrombi, which may also be a feature in patients with the disease who may be presenting with stroke-like symptoms.

One of the important distinctions that needs to be made is be-tween cardiac amyloidosis and other nonischemic cardiomyopa-thies, most notably hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, that can have potentially similar imaging findings. Abnormalities in myocardial nulling are a common feature in amyloidosis and can be useful in such a distinction. The term "myocardial nulling" refers to an inversion recovery pulse sequence that is used to null the signal from a desired tissue to accentuate surrounding pathology. A com-mon use of this technique is to null the signal from normal myo-cardium during delayed-enhanced imaging. The nulled normal myocardium will be dark in contrast to the enhanced abnormal myocardium. For example, in the setting of a myocardial infarction, the infarcted myocardial will appear "bright" next to the normally "dark" nulled noninfarcted myocardium (Figures 1 and 2). The inversion recovery pulses have a special parameter known as the inversion time. In order to null normal myocardi-um, the MRI technician must find the appropriate inversion time at which the normal myocardium is dark. This time does vary slightly from person to person and as such is a parameter that is determined at the time of the scan. A cine multi-inversion time inversion recovery sequence, in which each image is acquired with a slightly longer inversion time, is often used to select the optimal inversion time for the delayed enhancement acquisition. As the inversion time increases, the blood and myocardium pass through a null point at which signal is minimized. Generally, the blood pool contains a higher concentration of gadolinium and passes through the null point before the myocar-dium. In cardiac amyloidosis, however, this normal blood-pool-to-myocardium relationship is reversed and as such, the myo-cardium reaches the null point before the blood pool. The actual timing of the null point in the blood pool and myocardium can be graphed using on-board software contained on the imaging platform that is used in a particular institution. The evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis is clearly multifaceted and is directed initially by patient characteristics, laboratory stud-ies, and electrocardiographic studies. Noninvasive imaging tech-niques, particularly cardiac MRI, are having a more central role in the evaluation of patients with cardiac amyloidosis and, when integrated with other clinical features, may lead to an efficient and cost-effective clinical evaluation.RECOGNITION

Hal Dietz, MD (right), was the 2013 Robert L. Frye, MD, Lecturer. (Dr Frye is at left.) Dr Dietz is the Victor A. McKusick Professor of Medicine and Genetics at Johns Hopkins University and an investigator at Howard Hughes Medical Insti-tute. He also is director of the William S. Smilow Center for Marfan Syndrome Research, part of the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine at Johns Hopkins, as well as a professor of pediatrics, medicine, and molecular biology and genetics at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

RECOGNITION

The Department of Medicine at Mayo Clinic in Rochester has announced re-cipients of the 2013 Faculty Recognition Awards. Jae K. Oh, MD (left), received the Outstanding Mentor Award, and David A. Foley, MD (right), received the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases Laureate Award. Both are members of the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases.

6 MAYO CLINIC | CardiovascularUpdate

The rapidly changing health care economic en-vironment necessitates the pursuit of innovation in order to improve patient outcomes in a cost-effective manner. Technical advances must add value to clinical and financial outcomes.

The approach to treating mitral valve regur-gitation is but one example of changing practice guided by technological innovation. Many valves can be repaired rather than replaced, negating the need for long-term anticoagulation, and less-invasive robotic procedures can frequently be employed earlier in the clinical course, result-ing in fewer atrial arrhythmias and preserved left ventricular function.

In a study published in 2013 in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Rakesh M. Suri, MD, DPhil, cardio-vascular surgeon at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, demonstrated the affordability of robotic mitral valve repair compared with traditional sternotomy.

Dr Suri and colleagues reviewed a total of 747 consecutive patients at Mayo Clinic in Roch-ester who underwent mitral valve repair either via traditional sternotomy or minimally invasive robotic repair between July 1, 2007, and January 31, 2011. Patients were excluded from review if they required concomitant cardiac surgery, such as coronary artery bypass grafting or repair of congenital cardiac defects; had prior thoracot-omy or sternotomy; or had rheumatic valvular disease, active endocarditis, or peripheral vascu-lar disease. Of the 482 remaining patients, 282 had open mitral repair, while 200 underwent ro-botic repair. One hundred eighty-five pairs were identified for comparative baseline characteris-tics, and propensity matching was performed on the basis of preoperative variables.

Direct costs were calculated by using stan-dardized values for services and procedures obtained from the Olmsted County Healthcare Expenditure and Utilization Database, which has been used for cost studies since 1995. Provider and institutional costs were determined by ap-plying appropriate Medicare fees. Costs were standardized over the time period studied. The results were then aggregated into categories to enable comparison between the 2 approaches.

Additionally, Mayo Clinic in Rochester im-plemented a surgical process improvement proj-ect in July 2009 specifically designed to reduce the cost of cardiac surgical care without nega-tively impacting quality of care. Components of that redesign process included:

• Coordinatedcasesequencingacross operating rooms

Robotic Mitral Valve Repair is a Cost-Effective Treatment Compared With Standard Approach

• Staggeredstarttimes• On-timeoperatingroomstarttimes• Integratedstaff• Standardizedpostoperativecare algorithmsRobotic and open operative groups were

evaluated before and after implementation of the process improvement project.

Early complications were infrequent in both the open and robotic repair groups, with the ex-ception of the need for blood transfusion and early atrial fibrillation; both were statistically less frequent in the robotic repair group. Hospital length of stay initially was shorter in the robotic group (3.5 vs 5.3 days; P < .001).

Costs in both groups fell after implementa-tion of the surgical process improvement proj-ect, but costs declined more dramatically in the robotic group. Overall costs of those undergoing robotic mitral repair were slightly less but sta-tistically indistinguishable in comparison to the open group also exposed to the improvement project (Table).

There are 3 important findings in this study, according to Dr Suri:

• Systems innovation can lead to cost sav- ings, even in a large diverse cardiac valve surgery program

• Technical innovation can be optimized to be cost neutral

• Patientstreatedunderthiscombined model benefit from accelerated recovery

and shorter hospital staysThe current health care environment man-

dates that new medical treatments demonstrate added value either by reducing cost or improv-ing outcomes. This study demonstrates that im-provements in both are facilitated by concurrent deployment of both technical and systems in-novations in a large and diverse academic heart valve practice.

Rakesh M. Suri, MD, DPhil

Cardiothoracic SurgeryMayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota

Joseph A. Dearani, MD, ChairRichard C. Daly, MDKevin L. Greason, MDLyle D. Joyce, MD, PhDAlberto Pochettino, MDHartzell V. Schaff, MDJohn M. Stulak, MDRakesh M. Suri, MD, DPhil

Cardiothoracic Surgery Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Octavio E. Pajaro, MD, PhD, ChairPatrick A. DeValeria, MDDawn E. Jaroszewski, MDLouis A. Lanza, MD

Cardiothoracic Surgery Mayo Clinic in Florida

Kevin Landolfo, MD, ChairRichard C. Agnew, MDStephanie E. Helmer, MDJohn A. Odell, MDMathew Thomas, MD

Table. Summary of total hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) of patients treated with open ster-notomy or robotic mitral repair, before and after implementation of surgical process improvement project.

Group Median Cost ($) Median LOS (Days) Open Robotic Open Robotic

Before Redesign 32,650 34,920 5.3 3.5After Redesign 31,310 30,606 5.3 3.4All 31,838 32,144

MAYO CLINIC | CardiovascularUpdate 7

Robotic heart valve repair is also associated with a shorter recovery time after hospital dis-missal due to lack of sternotomy. "Patients have less pain, shorter recovery times, and are usually able to return to work and other activities sooner than individuals who have open repair," says Dr

Suri. "While these factors were not addressed in this review, they are important considerations for patients, their families, and the American econo-my. We are currently studying these very impor-tant outcomes and will hopefully have more to share on this topic in the very near future."

Earl H. Wood, MD, PhD (1913-2009), was born in Mankato, Minnesota. He received both his medical degree and doctorate in physiology from the University of Minnesota, joining the Mayo Clinic staff in 1942. His 40-year career was marked by in-tellectual curiosity and a collaborative spirit. Calvin Coolidge, the 30th president of the United States, wrote, "Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence … persistence and determination are omnipotent." This characteristic, added to talent and genius and combined in the single individual of Earl H. Wood, formed a giant on whose shoulders all of us stand in order to see the future and move toward it.

Dr Wood initially led the Mayo Clinic team charged with studying the effects of gravitational forces on World War II pi-lots in planes flying higher and faster than before. He built a human centrifuge in which he could replicate various gravi-tational forces and measure the effects on human physiology. He was both a leader and a participant, having actually sat in the business end of his self-designed centrifuge to person-ally experience 8-G acceleration levels during which time con-sciousness fades to nonexistence; an example of "leading from the front."

His work resulted in the invention of anti-gravitational suits ("G-suits") and physical maneuvers to counteract the ef-fects of gravitational forces. The design of the modern space-suit used by astronauts today is based on Dr Wood's G-suit.

His discoveries and inventions made it possible to perform real-time assessment of cardiovascular physiology. Modern versions of those inventions, such as the strain gauge manom-eter to directly measure arterial pressure and the ear oximeter to measure oxygen saturation of blood, are still in use today. He pioneered the use of indocyanine dye to measure cardiac output—a technique that is independent of variations in he-moglobin concentration—and identified dye curves character-istic of specific cardiac abnormalities.

A cherished letter mailed December 31, 1992, from the Holiday Inn, Room 6-172, Yorkdale, Toronto, Canada, begins, "Dear Dave: Thanks for your nice note [regarding] my current

David R. Holmes Jr., MDDr Holmes is the former director of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory at Mayo Clinic in Rochester and past president of the American College of Cardiology. He spoke recently at the dedication of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory in honor of the late Earl H. Wood, MD, PhD.

research activities: the information herein is a current status report." He and his beloved wife, Ada, were living in Canada in the Holiday Inn for 11 months as he worked on a Cana-dian Defence grant on gravitational forces and new designs of fighter planes. That note, written at the age of 80 years, was a continuation of the work started at Mayo Clinic in 1942 and that resulted in a President's Certificate of Merit by President Harry Truman in 1947. Dr Wood concluded that letter by say-ing, "My career and fulfillment have been based on making seemingly impossible dreams for the betterment of biomedi-cine come true."

As a problem solver, he defined eclecticism—bringing to-gether scientists and physicians from every specialty and ev-ery corner of the world to bring into sharp focus the issues at hand. The people he brought together, those he taught, those he worked with, and those he learned with and shared experi-ences with included pioneers, many of whom have gone on to make continued seminal advances worldwide as part of his legacy.

Yet he was a real person, a man devoted to his family, and not a theoretical construct. Each year beginning in 1942, he, family, and friends came together in the fall of the year for fam-ily traditions revolving around a deer hunt. After each hunt, statistics of the adventure were circulated. A little-known story relates that when he retired from Mayo Clinic, he and family and close friends sailed from Hawaii to Seattle. Family and friends were an essential core of his life.

Dr Wood once told his son, "Complicated things are just a series of very simple things put together." From the days of his 1942 thesis, "The Distribution of Electrolytes and Water Between Cardiac Muscle and Blood Serum with Special Refer-ence to the Effects of Digitalis," through his multiple scientific accolades, his presidential citation, to the naming of the Earl Wood Strasse on the grounds of a superb bioscience company in Germany, the qualities of persistence, talent, and genius al-lowed Earl H. Wood—the man and the legend—to live his life and his career of making impossible dreams come true.

Earl H. Wood, MD, PhD

10 minutes

W I T H

MC5234-0114

Continuing MediCal eduCation, Mayo CliniCFor additional information:Web: www.mayo.edu/cme/cardiovascular-diseasesEmail: [email protected]: 800-283-6296

Echo Revolution: Adult Echocardiography for Physicians and SonographersApr 4-6, 2014Boston, MA

Case Studies from the Heart of Manhattan: A Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular UpdateApr 10-12, 2014New York, NY

Mayo Clinic Update in Echocardiography: Role of Echo from Prevention to InterventionApr 10-13, 2014Scottsdale, AZ

Mayo Echocardiography Review Course for Boards and RecertificationApr 26-29, 2014Rochester, MN

Echo Fiesta: An In-Depth Review of Adult Echocardiography for Sonographers and PhysiciansMay 1-4, 2014San Antonio, TX

Heart Rhythm SocietyMay 7-10, 2014San Francisco, CA

Basic to Advanced Echocardiography: From the Riverfront of SavannahMay 14-17, 2014Savannah, GA

Cardiac Rhythm Device Summit: Implantation, Management, and Follow-upJun 13-15, 2014Chicago, IL

28th Annual Echocardiographic Symposium at Vail: New Technologies, Live Scanning, and Clinical Decision MakingJul 20-24, 2014Vail, CO

Success with Heart Failure: Strategies for the Evaluation and Treatment of Heart Failure in Clinical PracticeAug 11-13, 2014Dana Point, CA

19th Annual Mayo Cardiovascular Review Course for Cardiology Boards and Recertifica-tion with Pre-Course Echo Focus SessionAug 15-20, 2014Rochester, MN

Pediatric Cardiology 2014 Review CourseAug 17-22, 2014Dana Point, CA

Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Update

Medical Editor: Margaret A. Lloyd, MD, MBA

Editorial Board: Charanjit S. Rihal, MD, MBA Issam D. Moussa, MDWin-Kuang Shen, MD Joseph A. Dearani, MDFrank Cetta, MD Nicole B. Engler Marjorie G. Durhman

Managing Editor: Matthew T. Sluzinski

Art Director: Marjorie G. Durhman

Photography: Amanda R. Durhman

Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Update is written for

physicians and should be relied upon for medical

education purposes only. It does not provide a

complete overview of the topics covered and should

not replace the independent judgment of a physician

about the appropriateness or risks of a procedure for a

given patient.

Electrophysiology Review for Boards and Recertifi-cation: Transeptal Workshop and ConferenceSep 5-8, 2014Rochester, MN

Challenges in Clinical Cardiology: A Case-Based UpdateSep 12-14, 2014Chicago, IL

Echo at the Arch: Practical Review of Ischemic and Myopathic Heart DiseaseSep 21-22, 2014St. Louis, MO

11th Annual Mayo Clinic Interventional Cardiology Board ReviewSep 26-28, 2014Rochester, MN

Advanced Pathophysiology and Emerging Novel Therapeutic StrategiesOct 10-11, 2014Boston, MA

Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging with CT and MRI: Case-Based and Interactive ApproachOct 10-11, 2014Amelia Island, FL

30th Annual Echocardiography in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart DiseaseOct 15-19, 2014Phoenix, AZ

Advanced Catheter Ablation Course: New Tips, Tech-niques and Technologies for Complex ArrhythmiasOct 18-21, 2014San Francisco, CA

24th Annual Cases in Echocardiography, Cardiac CT and MRIOct 22-25, 2014Napa, CA

Coronary Artery Disease: Prevention, Detection & TreatmentNov 21-23, 2014Las Vegas, NV

SyMpoSia

Mayo Clinic Satellite Educational Symposia at ACC 2014Mar 29-31, 2014, Washington, DCSymposia to be announced

Mayo Clinic Satellite Educational Symposia at ASE 2014Jun 21-24, 2014, Portland, ORSymposia to be announced

Mayo Clinic Satellite Educational Symposia at AHA 2014Nov 15-19, 2014, Chicago, ILSymposia to be announced

CARDIOVASCULAR SELF-STUDYhttps://cardiovascular.education-registration.com/selfstudy

Contact UsMayo Clinic welcomes inquiries and referrals, and a request to a specific physician is not required to refer a patient.

Arizona 866-629-6362

Florida 800-634-1417

Minnesota 800-533-1564

Resourcesmayoclinic.org/medicalprofs Clinical trials, CME, Grand Rounds, scientific videos, and online referrals


Recommended