+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Date post: 26-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: ariana-davidson
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
28
Cyber Disruption: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Probability and Response Readiness Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013
Transcript
Page 1: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Cyber Disruption: Probability and Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response ReadinessResponse Readiness

WSEMASeptember 18, 2013

Page 2: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

SHORT BIOSHORT BIO• Partner, MK Hamilton and Associates

• CISO, City of Seattle

• Managing Consultant, VeriSign GSC

• Senior Principal Consultant, Guardent

• Independent Security Consultant

• CEO, Network Commerce, Inc.

• Ocean Scientist, NASA/JPL

Page 3: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Don’t Try ThisDon’t Try This

• Enabling Kevin Mitnick• JPL, SunOS 4.13, and

SATAN• Accessing credit cards• Oceanographic hacking• FreeBSD and the FWTK • The Bad Guys• Network Commerce Inc.

Page 4: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• Assume breach

• Preventive controls

not good enough

• Detective controls more

imperative as device

population grows

Security PhilosophySecurity Philosophy

• Focus on key assets and

event detection

• Mobile security should be

carefully evaluated

• Prevention on the "network

of things" will not scale

Page 5: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• Emergency response driven by IT disruption

• What it would look like

• What we normally do

• How response is different

• What we know now

• How we are addressing the problem

Cyber Meets Emergency ServicesCyber Meets Emergency Services

Page 6: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Local GovernmentLocal Government

Services that affect quality of life, and lifeWe’d like them to be there

6

Page 7: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• Credit cards, IP, and Infrastructure

• Hacktivists, organized crime, and nation-states

• Capability, meet intent

My PerspectiveMy Perspective

Page 8: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Critical Infrastructure Now the Critical Infrastructure Now the target of most attackstarget of most attacks

Overall cyber attacks are up, but most dramatically in the last year, the type of attack

has shifted away from hacking and financially motivated crime toward cyber

espionage focused on critical infrastructure, such as utilities, according to

research from communications provider Verizon.

“These aren’t about stealing data and fraud, they’re about deny, disrupt and

destroy,” said Bryan Sartin, director of investigative response for Verizon.

In its upcoming Data Breach Investigation Report, a yearly document that is one of the

more noteworthy surveys of attacks released to the public, the company found that

cyber espionage, once a far lesser component of the attack volume, is now

dominating networks.

http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20130227/

SHOWSCOUT01/130227002/Critical-infrastructure-now-target-most-

attacks

Page 9: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURECRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

It’s good business sense!

Page 10: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Attack on Fake Control SystemAttack on Fake Control System

Page 11: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Attack on Financial SectorAttack on Financial Sector

Page 12: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Telephony Denial of ServiceTelephony Denial of Service

Page 13: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

The Tunisian Cyber ArmyThe Tunisian Cyber Army

Page 14: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

#OpBlackSummer#OpBlackSummer

Page 15: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Closer to HomeCloser to Home

Page 16: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Closer…Closer…

Page 17: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Clark County Website DefacementClark County Website Defacement

Page 18: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

THREAT PROBAILITY: SIGNIFICANT

Page 19: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• Preparedness exercises

• EOC Activation

• NIMS: ESF2 and Logistics Branch

• WebEOC and other IT-enabled methods

• Role of the National Guard

• Application of the Stafford Act

How We Handle DisastersHow We Handle Disasters

Page 20: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• Escalation path not defined

• NIMS difficult to apply

• Fusion Center as coordination point

• No FEMA resource list, etc.

• Mutual-Aid agreements

• Role of the private sector

What’s DifferentWhat’s Different

Page 21: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• Exercises – Emerald Down, Evergreen, NLE12

• Fusion Center Cyber Analyst ([email protected])

• National Guard and State Response Plan for

Significant Cyber Disruption

• CIRCAS

• FEMA resource typing

• FBI cyber task force

• US Attorney Jenny Durkhan

State of ReadinessState of Readiness

Page 22: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

PRISEMPublic Regional Information Security Event Management

Regional Asset for Situational Awareness andCommon Operating Picture

Page 23: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• DHS S&T funding to initiate; Five grants total

• Participants contribute firewall logs, netflow, botnet

alerts (Einstein); arbitrary devices under monitoring

• Commercial SIEM infrastructure at UW APL

• Cities of Seattle, Lynnwood, Bellevue, Kirkland,

Redmond; Thurston and Kitsap Counties; Seattle

Children’s Hospital, Snohomish PUD

PRISEM HistoryPRISEM History

Page 24: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

PRISEM IN ACTION: HUNT FOR APT1

Page 25: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• Conduct more exercises on cyber disruption

• Finish the SCIRP

• Cement the role of the Fusion Center

• Continue working with FEMA

• Conduct outreach to the Private Sector

• Improve information sharing and situational

awareness

Before the Real EventBefore the Real Event

Page 26: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

• Improved resilience

• Avoiding cascading failures

• Protect regional infrastructure

• We learn to integrate

Benefits of PreparednessBenefits of Preparedness

Page 27: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

Is Cybersecurity a Bubble?Is Cybersecurity a Bubble?

Page 28: Cyber Disruption: Probability and Response Readiness WSEMA September 18, 2013.

My Contact InformationMy Contact Information

Michael Hamilton Chief Information Security Officer

City of [email protected]

206.684.7971 (D)


Recommended