DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFY 2017 PRESIDENT’S BUDGET
February 9, 2016
1
Fiscal Context
Operational Context
Balancing• Focused Investments• Hard Choices• Innovation and Reform
Mission Guidance
3 2
The Foundation – Guidance
National Security; Defense;
and Military Strategies
DoDStrategic Guidance
Quad. Defense Rvw
SECNAVPeople; Platforms
Power; Partnerships
National Security; Defense;
and Military Strategies
2
CNODesign for
MaintainingMaritime Superiority
CMCAdvance
To Contact
4 3
14 Ships
1 Ship
183 Ships
24 Ships50 Ships
Ukraine
Russia
China
North Korea
ISIL
Refugees
Boko Haram
Libya
Piracy
Al-Shabab
Cyber Attacks
TalibanSyriaIran
AQAP
Spratly IslandsSubi Reef
SPMAGTF-CR-CC
SPMAGTF-CR-AF
1 CVN1 ARG/MEU
1 CVN
1 CVN1 ARG/MEU
Executing the Guidance – the Navy and Marine Corps TodayOptions to the Nation
LegendCrossroadsNaval Presence
Personnel Sailors deployed afloat 35,564Sailors forward deployed 32,624Marines deployed afloat 4,570Marines forward deployed 30,732
as of 1 Feb 2016 3
Average Ship countToday / FY17/ FY21
Total: 272 / 287 / 308Deployed: 94 / 108 / 118
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Dep
loym
eny
Leng
th (D
ays)
Ship
s
Fleet Size vs Deployed Ships / Avg. Deployment Length
Ships Deployed Total Battle Force Avg Deployment Length
Fleet Size
Globally Deployed Ships
Executing the Guidance – Operational Trends
454 Ships
167 Days
108 Ships, FY9424% of Battle Force
94 Ships, FY1535% of Battle Force
272 Ships
217 Days
4
6 5
Executing the Guidance – Operational Trends
CY 14 – Operational Employment CY 15 – Operational Employment
*Planned deployments historically address 45% of COCOM demand Planned Deployments
CY 13 – Operational Employment
5
7 6
RUSSIA
CHINA
DPRK
IRANISIL
Executing the Guidance – An Evolving World
Accelerating change•Maritime System•Global Information System•Rate of Technological Creation and Adoption
SubmarineFiberOptic
Cable
6Blume, Andrew, “Undersea Cables.” Fortune Magazine, 2012
8 7
Executing the Guidance – An Evolving World
7Nuclear Vacuum, Frank Bennett, Aivazorsky, Darwinek, Yo/ Wikimedia Commons/ CC-BY-SA-3.0
9 88
DON Annual Budget in CY$ - Budget Trends
8
166.6
158.5
165.3163.5
166.8
156.8
152.8
150.0
158.2
158.9
156.4
152.2
159.9
152.9
159.5
155.7
157.4
147
151
155
159
163
167
171
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21
PB14
PB15
PB16
PB17FY 2016 Constant year Dollars
Billi
ons
of D
olla
rs
PB14
PB16
PB17
PB15
10 9
Balancing Overview
9
11 10
Military Personnel - Navy
10
Reserve Personnel StrengthActive Personnel StrengthAligns with force structure
o FY17 Active end strength 322.9K
• Fit / Fill funded at 92% / 95%
o Sailor 2025 Ready, Relevant Learning funded
• Active enlisted end strength reduced 6.6K across the FYDP
o Reflects deactivation of 10th air wing
o Funds HM wholeness; security forces
o FY17 Reserve end strength 58.0K
o Retain HSC-85 and establish two Tactical Support Units
329.2 326.5328.2 329.8 330.0
327.9 327.3322.9 322.2 324.4 323.6 323.1
310.0
320.0
330.0
340.0
FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21
ES (K
)
MPN
PB16 PB17
57.4
58.0
58.9 58.9 58.9
57.457.4
58.0
58.9 58.9 58.9 58.9
56.5
57.0
57.5
58.0
58.5
59.0
FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21ES
(K)
RPN
PB16 PB17
12 11
Military Personnel – Marine Corps
Reserve Personnel StrengthActive Personnel StrengthFocused on forward presence and crisis response
11
o Achieves 182K one-year prior than PB16 end strength plano Funds to 182K Active End Strength across FYDP o Strength meets steady state forward presence and crisis
response requirements around the globe o 1:2 deployment-to-dwell ratioo Major combat operations will drive risk in Deter/Deny
184.0
182.0 182.0 182.0 182.0
183.5
182.0
182.0182.0 182.0 182.0 182.0
170.0
175.0
180.0
185.0
190.0
195.0
200.0
FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21
ES (K
)
MPMC
PB16 PB17
38.9
38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5
38.9 38.9
38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 38.5
38.038.238.438.638.839.039.239.4
FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21ES
(K)
RPMC
PB16 PB17
o FY17 Reserve end strength 38.5Ko Ready, relevant, responsive forceo Seamlessly operates as a part of the total force
13 12
Civilian Personnel
175,237 179,759 181,562
23,405 21,737 21,755
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
FY15 FY16 FY17Marine Corps Navy
FY15 FY16 FY17 FTE by Appropriation/Fund
O&M 116,076 118,230 120,409Other (FHOPS/RDTEN) 1,532 1,787 1,783WCF 81,034 81,479 81,125
Total DON FTE
FTE FY15 FY17FY16
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21FYDP FTE* Profile: 203,317 201,818 201,503 200,982 200,567
*FTE=Full Time Equivalent
Scientists
Shipyard Workers
Highlights
198,642 201,496 203,317
12
Ø Ship Maintenance: Growth at Regional Maintenance Centers, SURFMEPP, in Japan, and at public shipyards to address maintenance backlogs.
Ø NWCF: FTE added to address increased flight hours and corrosion issues on existing aircraft.
Ø Installation Security: Guards added to counter increased risk at installations.
Ø Headquarters: Previous reduction increased to 25 percent of funding; will be fully realized by FY20.
Ø Overall FYDP: Decline of 2,750 FTE from FY17 to FY21.
14 13
Operations & Readiness
13NAVY BASE OCO
Ship Operations58 days/qtr deployed
24 days/qtr non-deployed($B)
3.8 3.8 3.5
1.2 1.41.1
0.0
1.5
3.0
4.5
6.0
FY15 FY16 FY17
Ship Depot Maintenance100% of projected maintenance
funded($B)
4.9 4.9 5.2
2.9 2.9 2.9
0.0
1.5
3.0
4.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
FY15 FY16 FY17
Flying Hour OperationsDeployed T-Rating
Navy 2.0 / Marine Corps 2.0($B)
6.5 5.8 6.5
1.01.4
0.9
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
FY15 FY16 FY17
1.4 1.5 1.7
0.30.1
0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
FY15 FY16 FY17
Aircraft Depot Maint/Logistics85% of projected maintenance
funded($B)
Marine Corps ReadinessOperating Forces
($B)
0.7 0.7 0.7
0.7 0.6 0.7
-
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
FY15 FY16 FY17
Marine Corps Ground Equip79% of maintenance
funded in FY17
0.2 0.2 0.2
0.4
0.2 0.2
-
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
FY15 FY16 FY17
($B)
MC BASE OCO
15 14
Shipbuilding ProcurementFY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FYDP
Ohio Replacement Program 0 AP AP AP AP 1 1CVN-21 0 0 1 0 0 0 1SSN-774 2 2 2 2 2 1 9DDG 51 2 2 2 2 2 2 10LCS/FF 3 2 1 1 1 2 7LHA(R) 0 1 0 0 0 0 1LPD 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 0LX(R) 0 0 0 0 1 0 1T-ATS 1 0 1 1 1 1 4Expeditionary Fast Transport (EPF) (formerly JHSV) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0Expeditionary Mobile Base (ESB) (formerly MLP AFSB) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0T-AO(X) 1 0 1 1 1 1 4 New Construction Total QTY 12 7 8 7 8 8 38LCAC SLEP 4 0 0 0 0 0 0Ship to Shore Connector 4 2 6 10 12 12 42LCU 1700 1 0 1 2 4 4 11Moored Training Ships 0 1 0 0 0 0 1CVN RCOH 1 0 0 0 1 0 1Other Construction Total QTY 10 3 7 12 17 16 55
Total Shipbuilding QTY 22 10 15 19 25 24 93FY16 enacted includes Congressional adds for T-ATS, JHSV (EPF), MLP AFSB (ESB), LCU 1700 and Congressional reduction of one Ship to Shore Connector.
LHA 6
14
Black Sea
SSN 785
DDG 107
ESB 3CVN 78
16 15
Aircraft ProcurementFY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FYDP
Fixed WingF-35C (CV) 6 4 6 12 18 24 64F-35B (STOVL) 15 16 20 20 20 21 97EA-18G** 10 0 0 0 0 0 0FA-18E/F*** 5 2 14 0 0 0 16E-2D AHE 5 6 5 3 4 5 23P-8A (MMA)** 17 11 6 13 0 0 30CA-40A 1 0 0 0 0 0 0KC-130J 2 2 2 2 2 2 10Rotary WingCH-53K (HLR) 0 2 4 7 13 14 40MV-22B* 19 16 6 6 6 14 48MH-60R 29 0 0 0 0 0 0AH-1Z/UH-1Y 29 24 27 27 0 0 78VH-92A 0 0 0 6 6 5 17UAVMQ-4 Triton 4 2 3 3 5 6 19MQ-8C Firescout 5 1 2 2 2 2 9RQ-21A Blackjack*** 6 8 4 5 5 3 25
TOTAL 153 94 99 106 81 96 476*FY 2018-2021 includes 6 V-22 per year for the Navy.**FY 2016 reflects A-12 settlement for 3 EA-18G and plan to procure 1 additional P-8A (MMA). ***FY 2017 includes 2 F/A-18 and 4 RQ-21 requested in the OCO request.
P-8A Poseidon
MV-22B Osprey
E-2D Hawkeye
F-35C (CV JSF)
MQ-8C Firescout
AH-1Z
CH-53K King Stallion
15
17 16
Weapons ProcurementLRASM
16
ESSM
TACTOM
* OCO funding for FY 2017.
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FYDP
Aircraft Weapons
AIM-9X 227 152 150 153 153 150 758
AMRAAM 167 163 247 260 252 248 1,170
AARGM 155 253 336 322 183 197 1,291
LRASM 0 10 25 25 0 0 60
JAGM 0 96 104 110 110 221 641
HELLFIRE* 0 100 0 0 0 0 100
SDB II 0 0 90 750 750 750 2,340
Ship Weapons
TACTOM 149 100 0 0 0 0 100
SM6 113 125 125 125 125 125 625
RAM 90 90 90 90 90 90 450
ESSM 30 75 28 52 46 56 257
MK 48 HWT 8 11 15 24 33 40 123
MK 48 HWT MODS 81 73 64 50 43 52 282
MK 54 LWT MODS 140 144 167 174 170 130 785
SOPGM 27 24 24 24 24 24 120
LCS SSMM 0 24 110 110 110 110 464
SM-6
AIM-9X
MK-54
Tomahawk Maritime Strike
18 17
0.6 0.7 0.8
0.40.5
0.7
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
FY15 FY16 FY17
Weapons,Vehicles &Other
Communications andElectronicsEquipment
0.2 0.2 0.2
0.6 0.6 0.5
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
FY15 FY16 FY17
Navy
USMC
1.9 2.3 2.5
2.22.4 2.1
2.3 1.9 1.9
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
FY15 FY16 FY17
Ships SupportEquipment
Communicationsand ElectronicsEquipment
Aviation,Ordnance &Other SupportEquipment
Additional Investment Numbers may not add due to rounding
G/ATOR
17
Bill
ions
of D
olla
rs
$6.4B $6.5B $6.5B
Key OPN Capability Enhancements
• CYBER and the EM Spectrum
• Ship Capabilities
• Submarine & Underwater Capabilities
Bill
ions
of D
olla
rs
$1.0B$1.2B
$1.5B
Bill
ions
of D
olla
rs $0.8B $0.8B $0.7B
OPN
PMC
PANMC Funding reflects Baseline + OCO
Key PANMC Capability Enhancements
• General Purpose Bombs
• Air Expendable Countermeasures
• Active Jammers, IR Decoys
Key PMC Capability Enhancements
• Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV)
• Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR)
• Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S)
SEWIP
General Purpose Bombs
19 18
R&D Investment
Numbers may not add due to rounding
MQ-4C Triton
18
Bill
ions
of D
olla
rs
2.1 2.3 2.1
1.3 0.9 0.9
12.714.9 14.4
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
FY15 FY16 FY17S&T Management Development
$16.1B
$18.1B$17.4B
Major Systems ($M) FY15 FY16 FY17
Ohio Replacement Program 1,203 1,391 1,091
Virginia Class SSN 189 317 209
CVN 78 236 225 223
Surface Ship Torpedo Defense 57 71 87
Joint Strike Fighter (F-35) 995 1,085 1,198
CH-53K 538 592 405
Executive Helo Development 357 507 338
MQ-4C Triton 449 357 293
UCLASS 382 435 0
CBARS (RAQ-25) 0 0 89
MQ-8 43 53 27
XL/LD Unmanned Undersea Veh 11 12 146
Amphibious Combat Vehicle 101 212 159
G/ATOR 91 66 84
Rapid Prototyping 0 0 55
Energy 245 231 328
Cyber Resiliency 0 55 88
Aviation
Shipbuilding
Unmanned
USMC
Other
Virginia Payload Module
ACV
20 1919
Facilities SupportNavy 70%
of facility sustainment model($B)
4.4 4.5 4.3
1.72.3
1.70.1
0.1
0.2
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
FY15 FY16 FY17
OCO
FSRM
BOS
2.0 1.92.2
0.7 0.80.7
0.2 0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
FY15 FY16 FY17
OCO
FSRM
BOS
$2.9B
Facilities SupportUSMC 74%
of facility sustainment model($B)
$6.2B$6.9B
$6.2B
$2.9B $2.9B
Shore Readiness
21 20
749986
640
390
754
426
60
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Navy Marine Corps OCO
Military Construction & Family Housing
Joint Region Marianas, Guam Parris Island Reconditioning Center
20
344 353301
16 1794
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
FHOPS FHCON
$361M $370M$395M
Mil
lion
s of D
olla
rs
$1.1B $1.1B
Mil
lion
s of D
olla
rs
FY17 MILCON ProjectsMajor Categories $ in Millions # of Projects
New Platform/Mission Support 357 9 COCOM Support 176 6*Energy 85 4 Ground Forces 73 1Guam 62 1Naval Shipyards 58 3*Quality of Life 48 2Training 39 2Reserves 35 4Environmental 13 1Planning and Design 92 N/AUnspecified Minor Construction 30 N/AOCO 60 3**
$1.7B
*Includes Energy project**Includes European Reassurance Initiative (ERI)
22 212121
Where it Matters, When it Matters
23 22
For more InformationFully searchable justification material available at:
http://www.secnav.navy.mil/fmc/fmb/Pages/Fiscal-Year-2017.aspx
23