www.postersession.com
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
D. Robillard, C. Taylor, T. Smith, J. Brousseau, J. Lofto, B. Johnston
Supervised by Sandra Johnstone, as part of GEOL 300: Igneous & Metamorphic Petrology course requirements, Spring 2015
Nanoose Geology
Geochemistry Petrography
In order to determine the nature of metamorphism, 9 thin sections
(7 from 2015; 2 from 2009) were analyzed using petrographic
microscopes. Photomicrographs of basalt from each site are shown
below in plane polarized light (PPL) and cross polarized light (XPL).
Predictions or Comments
Similar anomaly at Nankivell Point
(as outlined in the 2009 study)?
Results show a Karmutsen signature
within mapped Sicker Group territory
Evidence of contact metamorphism? Hornblende-hornfels-type (contact )
metamorphism adjacent to intrusion
Different geochemical signatures
proximal to the intrusion?
Basalt at Sites 1 & 2 display variable
and inconsistent geochemical affinites
Sincere thanks to the following contributors:
• Acme Labs in Vancouver, BC, for geochemical analysis.
• Vancouver Petrographics in Langley, BC, for thin sections.
• Students of GEOL300 for their participation in field studies.
• Sandra Johnstone for her guidance in completing this research.
Results suggest that geochemical anomalies at Nankivell Point
may be explained through contact metamorphism. Based on
geochemical and petrographic observations, we interpret that the
basalt as Nankivell Point may represent metamorphosed Sicker
Group basalt. However, further sampling is necessary.
Recommendations for future research:
1. Produce detailed geologic maps for all three sites.
2. Collect more samples and analyze metamorphic variability
closer to and further from the intrusive contact at Nankivell Point
3. Investigate the validity of mapped Karmutsen Fm. at Site 1.
Fig. 1. Current BCGS geology map of the Nanoose Peninsula study
area. Note the location of 3 sample sites. Site 1 is located at “Ainsley
Beach” where Karmutsen Fm. basalt shares a suspected fault-related
contact with a quartz-diorite “Island Intrusion” of the Bonanza Arc. Site
2 is located at Nankivell Point where quartz-diorite shares an intrusive
relationship with basalt interpreted as part of the Sicker Group[8]. Site 3
is located along Dolphin Beach where Sicker Group pillow basalt is
most dominant. Sicker-type-rocks associate with the Nanoose
Complex (mapped in blue); however, stratigraphic relationships are
unclear; age constraints are broadly Paleozoic[8]. Map derived from
BCGS data available at mapplace.ca. Base map modified by Robillard
et al. (2015).
Field Photos
Regional Geology
• Vancouver Island is mostly of the exotic Wrangellia terrane,
which formed during three major volcanic episodes[2]:
1. Sicker Group island-arc volcanism (380-360 Ma)[8]. These
rocks comprise the basement of Wrangellia and are overlain
by limestone of the Buttle Lake Group.
2. Karmutsen Fm. ocean-island volcanism (230-225 Ma)[3].
Karmutsen basalt represents the most widespread unit on
Vancouver Island and is overlain by Quatsino Fm. limestone.
3. Bonanza island-arc volcanism (202-168 Ma)[1]. Bonanza
rocks represent the final episode of Wrangellian volcanism
and commonly intrude older Wrangellian rocks.
• Wrangellia collided with North America ~100 Ma[8]. Thus, rock
units comprising Wrangellia are commonly folded and faulted.
The geology of Nanoose is not well understood[8]. Mafic volcanic
rock (i.e., basalt) is currently mapped as Sicker Group in the
northeast and Karmutsen Formation (Fm.) in the southeast (Fig.
1). However, a 2009 study by VIU students suggests that Sicker
Group basalt at Nankivell Point may actually be part of the
Karmutsen Fm. The goal of this research is to investigate an
anomalous geochemical result from the 2009 study at Nankivell
Point in order to determine if (a) basalt is incorrectly mapped as
Sicker Group, or (b) if metamorphism is causing this anomaly.
If basalt at Nankivell Point is incorrectly mapped as Sicker Group
(and is in fact Karmutsen Fm.), we expect a lack of contact
metamorphism in addition to Karmutsen signatures on AFM,
MnO/TiO2/P2O5, TAS, and Harker diagrams. If, however,
metamorphism is responsible for geochemical anomalies
reported in 2009, we expect contact metamorphic mineral
assemblages and different geochemical signatures in samples
closer to and further from a local intrusive body.
1. Canil, D., Styan, J., Larocque, J., Bonnet, E., & Kyba, J. (2010). Thickness and composition of the Bonanza arc
crustal section, Vancouver Island, Canada. Geological Society of America Bulletin, B26578-1.
2. DeBari, S.M., Anderson, R.G., & Mortensen, J.K. (1999). Correlation among lower to upper crustal components in
an island arc: the Jurassic Bonanza arc, Vancouver Island, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 36(8),
1371-1413.
3. Greene, A.R., Scoates, J.S., Weis, D., Nixon, G.T., & Keiffer, B. (2009). Melting history and magma evolution of
basalts and picrites from the accreted Wrangellia ocean plateau, Vancouver Island, Canada. Journal of Petrology.
4. Le Maitre, R. W., Streckeisen, A., Zanettin, B., Le Bas, M. J., Bonin, B., & Bateman, P. (Eds.). (2002). Igneous
rocks: a classification and glossary of terms: recommendations of the International Union of Geological Sciences
Subcommission on the Systematics of Igneous Rocks. Cambridge University Press.
5. Massey, N.W.D. (1995). Geology and mineral resources of the Alberni-Nanaimo Lakes sheet, Vancouver Island:
92F/1W, 92F/2E, 92F/7E. British Columbia, Geological Survey.
6. Massey, N.W.D. (1995). Geology and mineral resources of the Cowichan Lake sheet, Vancouver Island: 92C/16.
British Columbia, Geological Survey.
7. Winter, J.D. (2010). Principles of igneous and metamorphic petrology, 2nd Ed. Prentice Hall.
8. Yorath, C.J., Sutherland, A., and Massey, N.W.D. (1999). Lithoprobe, Southern Vancouver Island, British
Columbia: Geology, Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 498.
Whole-rock geochemistry for 7 basalt samples (5 from 2015; 2 from
2009 study) was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry (ICP-MS). These data are compared with published
geochemical data[3,5,6,8] on Karmutsen Fm. and Sicker Group rocks.
Site 1 hosts 2 different varieties of altered basalt. Further from the
intrusion, sulphide-bearing “basalt” is heavily altered and contains
some clastic material of unknown composition (Fig. 6). Closer to the
contact, typical fine-grained basalt is less oxidized and contains some
2 mm amygdules of calcite and cubic pyrite (Fig. 2).
Site 2 also hosts 2 types of altered basalt. Further from the intrusion,
brown-hornblende-rich basalt (Fig. 3) contains mineral assemblages
that may suggest hornblende-hornfels-facies metamorphism. Close to
the intrusion, clinopyroxene is more dominant and overprints twinned
plagioclase phenocrysts (Fig. 4).
Site 3 showcases dark-green, opaque-rich, plagiophyric pillow basalt
(Fig.6). Mineral assemblages (Fig. 5) resemble those characteristic of
prehnite-pumpellyite to lower-greenschist-facies metamorphism[7].
Fig. 6. ( ) Alteration and clasts noted
in basalt at Site 1. Clastic material is
not characteristic of Karmutsen Fm.
basalt. ( ) Intrusive contact at Site 2,
marked by abundant dykes and felsic
veins. ( ) Green pillow basalt at Site 3
is interpreted as part of the Sicker
Group. Photos by Sandra Johnstone.
Na2O + K2O
Fe2O3T
MgO
Derived from
more-evolved magma
MnO*10
TiO2
P2O5*10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
37 42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77
Na
2O
+ K
2O
(w
t. %
)
SiO2 (wt. %)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77
Na
2O
(w
t. %
)
SiO2 (wt. %)
0
5
10
15
20
42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77
Al 2
O3
(wt. %
)
SiO2 (wt. %)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77
CaO
(w
t. %
)
SiO2 (wt. %)
0
5
10
15
20
25
42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77
Fe
2O
3T
(w
t. %
)
SiO2 (wt. %)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77
MgO
(w
t. %
)
SiO2 (wt. %)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
(g) (h)
(a) AFM diagram. Sicker Group plots dominantly calc-alkaline, while
Karmutsen Fm. plots tholeiitic. Note considerable signature overlap.
(b) MnO/TiO2/P2O5 diagram. Note distinct separation between Sicker
Group and Karmutsen Fm data. Site 1 & 2 samples vary with location.
(c) TAS diagram. Boundaries define specific volcanic rock types[4].
Sicker Group data spans various rock types; Karmutsen Fm. plots
strongly within the basalt category[4]. No genetic significance implied.
(d-h) Harker diagrams. Major oxides are plotted against SiO2. Plots
show consistent trends. However, notice that overlap is significant.
Introduction
References
Fig. 2. Fine-grained basalt in PPL (left) and XPL (right). Clinopyroxene
overprints feldspar laths. Opaques represent Fe-Ti oxides and cubic pyrite.
50μm 50μm
200μm 200μm
50μm 50μm
Sicker affinity: Karmutsen affinity:
Sicker affinity: Karmutsen affinity:
Sicker affinity: Karmutsen affinity:
Sicker affinity: Karmutsen affinity:
Fig. 3. Brown-hornblende-rich basalt in PPL (left) and XPL (right).
Hornblende dominates and crystallizes with glomeroporphyritic style.
50μm 50μm
Fig. 4. Typical fine-grained basalt in PPL (left) and XPL (right). Plagioclase
is overprinted by abundant clinopyroxene. Note similarities with Fig. 2.
Fig. 5. Quartz-epidote vein in PPL (left) and XPL (right). Also note fibrous
pumpellyite—an indicator mineral for prehnite-pumpellyite metamorphism[7].
Calc-alkaline
Tholeiitic
Basalt
Data Legend *Note the location of each sample relative to the intrusion
Published Data: Sicker Group Karmutsen Formation
W E L C O M E T O N A N O O S E P E N I N S U L A
Nankivell Point
“Ainsley Beach”
Dolphin Beach
1
2
3
1:30,000
1 km
Bonanza Arc“Island Intrusions”
Sicker-related“Nanoose Complex”
Karmutsen Fm.
Fault structure
Ocean
Site number
Nanoose
Study Area
Lantzville
NanaimoSchooner
Cove
Sicker Group
Karmutsen Fm.
epidote
altered
plagioclase
hornblende
clinopyroxene