Date post: | 03-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | costis-dallas |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 77
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
1/77
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
2/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Outline
European digital infrastructures for the humanities
Presenting method and results of a recent study
Questioning some widely accepted truisms:
Should infrastructures mainly serve digital humanists?
provide those services researchers ask for? offer access chiefly to primary data?
mainly support information seeking?
implement the humanities research worlflow?
be like integrated Virtual Research Environments? Theorizing and modeling scholarly activity
Conceptual dependencies and open issues
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
3/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Digital infrastructure initiatives
and user research
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
4/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
European humanities digitalresearch infrastructures projects
Digital Research Infrastructure for the Artsand Humanities
European Holocaust Research Infrastructure
Advanced Research Infrastructure for
Archaeological Datasets Networking inEurope
Europeana Cloud / Europeana Research
Also
Network for Digital Methods in the Arts andHumanities
Collaborative European Digital ArchiveInfrastructure
..and HERA, Project BAMBOO, DASISH,HERA, CenterNet, arts-humanities.net
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
5/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
DARIAH-EU
Mission: to enhance and support digitally-enabled researchacross the humanities and arts
DARIAH aims to develop and maintain an infrastructure insupport of ICT-based research practices
DARIAH is working with communities of practice to: Explore and apply ICT-based methods and tools to enable new
research questions to be asked and old questions to be posed innew ways
Improve research opportunities and outcomes through linkingdistributed digital source materials of many kinds
Exchange knowledge, expertise, methodologies and practicesacross domains and disciplines
Legal form: Established as an European Research InfrastructureConsortium (ERIC)
Follow-up from Preparing DARIAH(2008-2011) project
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
6/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Studying scholarly practice and needsin EU infrastructures projects
Semi-structured interviews in the Preparing DARIAHproject(DCU, Greece)
Mixed methods research in EHRI, based on concurrent: Researcher questionnaire survey (N: 277; DCU, Greece) 15 semi-structured interviews with researchers (DCU, Greece) 20 semi-structured interviews with archivists (KCL, UK; NIOD,
Netherlands)
Further research
ARIADNE and eCloud starting now (February March 2013)
DARIAH-EU planned research on Understanding scholarly
practice (2013-2015) Methods ontology work in collaboration with NeDiMAH
(initiated January 2013)
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
7/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Information seeking, behaviour anduse research on scholarly practice
Stone (1982) Humanities scholars: information needs and uses
Tibbo (1991) Information systems and services for the humanities
Beeman (1994) Stalking the art historian
Dalton & Charnigo (2004) Historians and their information sources
Duff et al. (2004) Historians use of archival sources Toms & OBrien (2008) Understanding the ICT needs of the e-
humanist
Palmer & Craigin (2008) Scholarship and disciplinary practices
and many more: Jones (1989), Sievert & Sievert (1989), Gould(1998), Chu (1999), Yakel (2005), Case (2002/2006)
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
8/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Studying humanists in the digitalinfrastructures specification context
Different questions to those in informationbehaviour research
Instrumental rationale: to develop bettersystem requirements for infrastructures
Addressing affordances that may not yetexist
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
9/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Approach and objectives
Specification of digital infrastructurse for the arts andhumanities needs to address the historical practices,needs and perceptions of scholars
Seeking to understand information requirements ofscholarly research, as well as differences between
disciplines, research fields and methodologies Evidence-based substantiation of infrastructure
requirements and specificationsHow scholars interact with the whole spectrum of information
and conceptual entities, digital as well as non-digital
Developing a conceptual framework for the identificationof pertinent categories and properties representingscholarly research
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
10/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
EHRI
How do Holocaust researchers familiar withdigital technology account for theirinformation needs, practices and
technology use?
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
11/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
EHRI survey
Population
Online digital technology usersinvolved in Holocaust-relatedresearch, regardless of professionalstatus and affiliation
Most appropriate target group for
use of planned EHRI services Sampling
Purposive sampling approach
Recruitement of respondentsthrough publicity to:
Holocaust-related online
forums and informationservices
EHRI network of partners
Data constitution
Online questionnaire, using theSurveymonkey service
277 total valid responses (less insome questions)
Mixed methods methodological
framework Questionnaire survey running in
parallel to semi-structuredinterviews, analyzed by means ofqualitative content analysis andconceptual modeling
Questionnaire formulationinformed by preliminary interviewresults
Survey results further interpretedthrough semi-structured interviews
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
12/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Scope of survey
Demographics of research actors Country of residence
Status (researcher, student,amateur..)
Discipline or field of research
Experience in archival research
Use of different kinds of resources Unpublished resources
Published sources
Reported importance of specificresearch activities Information seeking
Entry points to information
Foreign language use Storing and organising
Studying and annotating
Collaborating
Procedures: beliefs and attitudes On collaboration and sharing
On resource trustworthiness
Place Place of work
Hardware devices used
Digital tools and services Software tools used
Online services used
Motives Reasons for using digital
technology for research
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
13/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Who are the Holocaust
researchers?
NB: Purposive sample represents
connected researchers
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
14/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Most respondents live in Europe;
US residents the 2nd largest group.
Most respondents live inEurope, while one out ofseven (14%) lives in theUnited States. The largestgroups are residents of
Germany (20%) and Holland(15%). Next are residents ofIsrael and the UK (6%),Hungary (4%), Greece,France, Belgium andRomania (3%).
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
15/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
More than are professional researchers; students and
amateurs follow suit.
Researchers are the largestgroup: 28% working inuniversities, 13% outsideacademia and 13% arefreelance. 20% are PhD or
postgraduate students.Smaller groups includeamateur researchers (7%)and museum professionals(5%).
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
16/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
2/3 are historians followed by Hebrew/Jewish studies,
cultural studies, literature & political science.
Of 292 respondents, 187identified history as one oftheir research fields, 45 saidHebrew/Jewish studies, 37cultural studies, 28 languagesand literature, 21 political
science and 18 internationalrelations. Museum studies,sociology, visual studies andarchival science followed suit.
Holocaust-related culturalrepresentation, memory andtrauma research may explainnon-obvious frequency ofcultural and museum studies.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
17/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Most respondents report being experienced in archival
research.
Of 190 respondents to thisquestion, 90 identifythemselves as experts inconducting archivalresearch, 85 as of
intermediate expertise andonly 15 as novices.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
18/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Use of resources
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
19/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Textual resources still predominate;audio and video have gone digital.
The large majority of respondentsreport using textual resources inorder of frequency, correspondence,official and legal documents - andphotographs, compared to much
smaller numbers for audiovisualmedia. Textual sources are notablymore often accessed in analog form;conversely, video and soundrecordings are more often accessed indigital form.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
20/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Books still most commonly used;
print still more common than digital access.
Books are the most commonkind of published sources usedby respondents, closelyfollowed by journals,conference proceedings and,
not far behind, self-publishedand grey literature. Print is stillmore common than digitalaccess, especially for books.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
21/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Digital access for journals predictably more common foracademic faculty and students.
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
22/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Research activities
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
23/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Most important research
activities for respondents
Multilingual primary resource use tops the list.Activities related to seeking unpublished sources, as well
as in filing and organizing both unpublished and published
materials are also often listed as very important:
Footnote hunting, query searching, query refinement
and consulting finding aids to find primary sources
Storing digital copies, collecting references, andstoring printed copies of both unpublished and
published materials
Activities related to study and annotation follow suit in
being often considered very important:
Highlighting relevant text passages, storing notes
with them, looking for interesting passages andwriting margin notes
Asking for comments on initial research ideas follows as
the most important collaboration activity
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
24/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Named entities and dates the most important
aspects of subject used to find unpublished sources.
In seeking primary sourcesby subject, the mostcommon entry pointsconsidered as veryimportant by respondents
were, in order of frequency,person names, dates, placesand names of specificevents; classifications ofevents, of people and ofplaces, and other topics,were less frequentlymentioned as veryimportant.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
f i i h i h h i
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
25/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Name of issuing authority or author the most important
document property used to find sources.
In seeking primary sourcesby document property, themost common entry pointsconsidered as veryimportant by respondents
were, in order of frequency,name of author or issuingauthority, collection name,resource genre and format.Document properties wereless frequently reported asvery important than aspectsof resource subject such asnamed entities and dates.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
26/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Attitudes
R h f h l i i i b
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
27/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Research of other people is an important interest; about
would share resources and publish jointly
About two thirds would liketo find out about otherscurrent research work.
Almost as many:
Would share interesting
resources and inform-ation on their own work
Would like to publishtogether with others
Fewer regard copyright or
privacy as major obstacles.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
S id i t bli ti t t th d
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
28/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Some consider print publications more trustworthy, and
physical archive resources more so than digital.
A sizeable minority considerprinted papers and booksmore trustworthy thanonline publications, andresources in a physical
archives more trustworthythan those in a digitalarchive.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
29/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Place of work
M d t k t h th i lib hi
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
30/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
More respondents work at home than in a library, an archive o
in a shared or private office.
The majority of respondentswork regularly at home.
Many work in a library, and aslightly lower number in anarchive.
Fewer still work in a personalor shared office.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
F ti l th i PC h d
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
31/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Four times as many people use their own PC vs. a shared
one; a sizeable minority uses digital tables or mobiles.
Most respondents use theirown computer for researchpurposes.
A much smaller, but stillsizeable proportion, use a
digital tablet, or ashared/work computer.
These results, suggestingmobility and independence,fit well with the information
that respondents work moreoften at home, and alsofrequently at other placessuch as a library or archive.
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
32/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Use of digital tools and services
Excel is the Swiss army knife for research data;
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
33/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Excel is the Swiss army knife for research data;
a small minority use user-configured Access DBs.
The most common softwareapplications used are wordprocessors and spreadsheets.A bibliographic referencemanagement software, as
well as various databaseapplications follow suit. Onlya few use institutional orthematic researchrepositories.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
Google dominates online services use; filesharing and social
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
34/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Google dominates online services use; filesharing and social
network services are also used by some.
Google+ - probably meant asGoogle in general tops thelist of online services used,followed by GoogleDocuments and Translate.
Decreasing numbersmention that they useDropbox, various socialnetworks such as Facebook,academia.edu and LinkedIn,and Twitter.
Zotero and Refworks arealso used, albeit by a smallminority.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
35/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Motives for ICT use
Majority uses computers for diverse research uses
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
36/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Majority uses computers for diverse research uses,
including annotation & research data management.
The majority of respondentsuse computers for mostaspects of the researchlifecycle: word processing,searching catalogues and
finding digital resources,communicating withcolleagues, searching digital
journals, keeping notes,organizing research data,preparing presentations,
and storing relevantpublications locally.
EHRI researchers questionnaire survey. C. Dallas, A. Benardou & P. Constantopoulos,
Digital Curation Unit-IMIS, Athena Research Centre, Greece (2011-12).
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
37/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Theorizing scholarly practice
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
38/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
J. Unsworths scholarly primitives
On humanities research process modeling: a core list ofprimitives Discovering Annotating
Comparing Referring Sampling Illustrating Representing
Providing for information access, manipulation and displayenvironments with appropriate affordances and user interfaces
Facilitating digital scholarship through new kinds ofrepresentation and analysis of arts and humanities information
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
39/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Modeling scholarly practice
A formal model, intended to captureknowledge about scholarly informationpractices
A specialisation of CIDOC ConceptualReference Model
Inspired by activity theory
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
40/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Scholarly Research Activity Model
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
41/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Cultural-historical activity theory
Activity: purposeful interaction of a subject with theworld
Directed toward an object, a physical or conceptual entityembodying the fulfilment of some objective or motive,intended to meet a specific needofthe subject
Activity systems are composed as a hierarchy ofactivities,constituted by conscious actions, which in turn areconstituted by sub-conscious operations
Subjects can be individuals, but also communities ofpractice, sharing needs and motives.
Activities take place by means oftool mediation, whichinclude both physical and cognitive mediationalartefacts
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
42/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
The compositional structure ofactivity
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
43/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
A simple(r) activity theory model
i i i f
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
44/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Descriptive vs. normative aspects ofscholarly activity
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
45/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Scholarly information activity
as digital curation at the source
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
46/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Questions
What is the scope of information objects curated inthe scholarly research process?
What is the relation between data and scholarly objects?
What is the structure of scholarly research activity,
and what does it entail? How do workflows look like, and how fixed are they?
How serialised, and how granular, are scholarly primitives?
What is the relationship between information seeking
and curation, as part of scholarly activity? When is curation enacted in the scholarly activity lifecycle,
and by whom?
C f i bj
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
47/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Co-reference, merging objectidentity
Quite frequently a scholar might find a fragment of asculpture or vase in one museum that joins to a similarpiece in another museum. Dyfri Williams has done justthat with an Archaic Greek vase fragment, in the Ure
Museum [], that joins a dinos (bowl) attributed tothe painter, Sophilos, which is housed in the BritishMuseum []. So access to the fragment on the Ure DBgives visitors only a glimpse of the whole, and to seethe more significant parts of the vase, one has to haveaccess to the corresponding piece in the BritishMuseum (Fuchs, Isaksen & Smith, 2005)
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
48/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and researchinfrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Object collocation, attribution
[] The same Archaic fragment is also partof several distributed assemblages ofobjects. For example, someone interested
in the works of Sophilos would wish toconsult all of the 91 works attributed to orsigned by that artist [...] These are
fortunately brought together, albeit inlimited form, on the Beazley Archive.(Fuchs, Isaksen & Smith, 2005)
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
49/77
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
50/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Versioning, curating
Okay, you get someone annotating or correcting orsending information. You can get it as a list ofemails, and then you have to work with that, andthen you need the management tool for that. Youneed to know, okay, this one must be sent to thisadvisor ... This one is something that I can ignore.This one needs another consultation with thisexpert. This one I want to take into account andchangethe authorised description. So this kind of
administrative tool does not exist, we [haventfound] yet a good tool for that anywhere. (Speck &Links 2013: archivist interview)
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
51/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Searching, organising
I want to be able to search through all notecards Ihave ever made ever in my life, not just those for acertain text I've read since that would limit my quotesto that text. I want every quote I've ever jotted downthat contains the word "umbrage" to appear if I searchfor that term. [] I want to then have a space where Ican take the results of multiple such searches: Victorian
Honor
Umbrage
and order the notecards or quotes in a way I want.(anon. 2010, chroniclecareers.com forum)
T l ti t ti
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
52/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Term selection, construction,definition
As far as possible I use established terms asclearly as I can. I would rather try to describewhat Im looking at and see how it sits withinthe framework of discussion in the literature. I
think if you have to call a new term you couldhave to be really sure what you are doing. []Where one does have to create a new term itneeds to be glossed with the kind of definition
that you hope will then get into the secondaryliterature in its own right (UK archaeologist,quoted in Benardou et al. 2010)
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
53/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Scholarly primitives as research activity-centred relations
R l ti hi b t ti iti d
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
54/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Relationship between activities andinformation objects
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
55/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Interplay between facts and theories
[i]t is conceivable that, through the use of links, website visitors may be able to see how the archaeologistmoves back and forth [] between images, artifacts,documents, and theories, to arrive at aninterpretation about the site. They may be able to
better understand which of the archaeologist'squestions were NOT answered what "testimplications" were NOT met. Suppose visitors could"see", with image maps, say, the artifacts as they layin the ground and experience links between those
artifacts and the ethnographic examples thatsuggested certain kinds of artifact patterning to thearchaeologist? (Landow 1992)
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
56/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations56
From objects to theories
categorical knowledge,
domain knowledge,
theories, classifications,
ontologies
things in the
world
identifications,
descriptions, facts
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
57/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Epistemic cultures (Knorr-Cetina 1999)
Particular configurations of Working practices Institutional arrangements
Roles and hierarchies
Technologies
They differ amongst different communitiesof epistemic practice
E.g., between high-energy physicists andmolecular biologists
Not only diffferent disciplines!
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
58/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Tool mediation
Archaeologists need to be more aware not only of howwe span the multiple gaps, the multiple fields, betweenthe material world and text, plans, maps, illustrations andso on, but also of how these processes are caught up indiverse networks linking fields which encompasseverything from funding bodies, sociopolitical alliances,
media and materialities [] to, for example, even themodes of engagement and articulation practised by anartillery officer in the British military during theNapoleonic wars. We need [] to situate this process inrelation to these larger networks []. Things (our tapes,trowels, theodolites, media, etc.), too, have a stake in our
nonlinear and interconnected paths of knowledgeproduction []. They too must be included. This scheme ofmultiple fields is a means of maintaining something of thecomplexity of archaeological practice in our modes ofdocumentation and language. (Witmore 2004)
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
59/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Tool mediation: a broader account
A continuum of epistemic objects, mediated by Thick descriptions, materiality-informed inscriptions
Importance of secondary archive
Complex subject access Overlapping and inconsistent terminologies
Different languages, disciplinary traditions
Persistence of value of old knowledge
Static or slow-changing information resources, e.g.corpora
Legacy research always important
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
60/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Object-centered research mediation
Epistemic cultures in object-centred disciplines Information-intensive, object-centred
E.g., molecular biology, archaeology, art history
Typically idiographic rather than nomothetic
Densely connected, deeply nested, topologicallycomplex objects
Inconsistency of facts, intransitivity in reasoning
Practice informed by thingy mediating tools Quasi-objects, boundary objects, mutable mobiles
Material tools, interactive kinds
People in situated action
H h l i l it
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
61/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
How an archaeological siteremembers its facts
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
62/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
The world of activity
Activity model
Epistemic agency
Epistemic process
Epistemic object
A second-level articulation between anontology, an epistemology and a
methodology
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
63/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
64/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Scholarly activity meta-domains
Scholarlyactivity
Epistemicagency
Epistemicobjects
Epistemicprocess
Epistemology
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
65/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Questions and issues
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
66/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Infrastructure requirements
Individual disciplines (will) have their own mechanisms,repositories, tools and other resources
In this light, where are particular needs for cross-disciplineresources, services, tools, infrastructures?
Which of the following is a) desirable, b) feasible? Do nothing is should be an issue for each discipline to solve Focus just on cross-discipline information dissemination, so that
people can know and adopt tools and services used succesfully inneighbouring disciplines
Identify those collections/resources/datasets used across specificdisciplines, and provide cross-discipline access
Federate and provide collective access to all discipline-basedinformation sources (collection-level, people, methods etc.)
Federate and provide full access to individual resources across thehumanities
Requirements information access and
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
67/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Requirements information access anddiscovery
Do we need information services on Research problems, programmes, long-term initiatives?
Topics, research areas, concepts, theories as entry points?
People, i.e., scholars, researchers? E.g., a registry or communityof practice where humanists can find out what others are working
on; who works on a particular area, etc? Collections of research sources, existing databases, repositories,
archive? E.g., a collection level registry? Should it include justdigital or all collections?
Research methods, procedures, best practices? E.g., an systematic
index of methods related to disciplines and research problems?Also with particular projects / people / collections involved?
Tools and services? Listing what tools are available, and for whichpurpose?
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
68/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Requirements curation
Primary cultural object repositories, corpora, databases etc.exist in different countries, disciplines, research areas, andrightly so, ensuring reliability and authenticity
Given the nature of humanities information objects, and therise of online research, how do we keep up to date
information on corrections, annotations, links as knowledge onthese objects evolves?
Given that scholarly research is evidenced in publication -increasingly digital, especially for journals- is it useful toconnect these to resources, and how?
How do we imagine online scholarly communication? Apartfrom digital publication, is interaction in blogs, forums etc.important? Should it become part of the information record ofresearch? How should it be preserved and supported?
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
69/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Requirements - sociotechnical
Should infrastructure projects (such as DARIAH) focusmostly on developing their own systems, or not?
Which of the following are a) desirable, b) feasible? Develop prescriptive mechanisms for particular areas of scholarly
information, e.g. for scholarly resource metadata and work
towards enforcement across Europe Develop tools; a workbench; a virtual research environment Develop / evangelise standards, guidelines etc. to mine connect,
integrate existing resources, tools etc. Develop canonical meta-collections, filters, recommenders Energise particular business models, trial initiatives etc. in the area
of scholarly communication, publication, open access, academicadvancement etc.
Advocate adoption of digital humanities, provide information,learning materials etc.
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
70/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Six truisms on the specification of
humanities digital infrastructures
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
71/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Truism #1: Digital infrastructures shouldserve digital humanists
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
72/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Truism #2: Digital infrastructures should bebased on digital services humanists ask for
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
73/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Truism #3: Digital infrastructures shouldprovide access to primary research data
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
74/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Truism #4: Digital infrastructures shouldfocus on serving information seeking needs
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
75/77
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
76/77
Costis Dallas (2013) Scholarly activity, information requirements and research
infrastructures: European initiatives and intellectual foundations
Truism #6: digital infrastructures shouldprovide an integrated virtual research
environment for humanists
7/29/2019 Dallas, Costis (2013) Scholarly Activity, Information Requirements and Research Infrastructures
77/77
Thank you!
For more info:http://www.dariah.eu
http://[email protected]