+ All Categories
Home > Business > Dana Skelley, Why Change

Dana Skelley, Why Change

Date post: 18-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: landorlinks
View: 1,608 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Dana Skelley, Director of Roads, Transport for London How partnership working and improved collaboration can support lower cost delivery services and better utilisation of resources and skills.
27
The Future of Local Transport Delivery Road Show 2011 Why Change Dana Skelley Director of Roads TfL
Transcript
Page 1: Dana Skelley, Why Change

The Future of Local Transport

Delivery Road Show 2011

Why Change

Dana Skelley – Director of Roads TfL

Page 2: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 3: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 4: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 5: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 6: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 7: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 8: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 9: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 10: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 11: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 12: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 13: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 14: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 15: Dana Skelley, Why Change
Page 16: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Transforming London Highways

Management

• Across London around £450m pa spent on

highways related activities, via c100 contracts

• Range of different specifications

• Range of rates for similar activities varies

considerably across the 34 London Authorities

• Scope for a better service at a lower cost

.

Page 17: Dana Skelley, Why Change

How? • Better utilisation of resources and skills –

Contractor & Client

• Clear links between service levels, cost and risk

• Minimum disruption through joint forward

planning and improved collaboration on area

works

• Better and more consistent customer experience

• Reduction in interfaces and the use of common

specifications

• Ceasing the constant state of retendering

Page 18: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Project Partners

• LoTAG

• London Strategic Procurement Board

• Sub Regional Procurement Groups

• London Councils (Capital Ambition)

• Efficiency and Reform Group (formally OGC)

• HTMA

And we are feeding into the National scheme HMEP

Page 19: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Structure

Project Sponsor

Martin Smith

Chief Executive LB Ealing

Joint TfL/Borough

Project Board

London Highways Alliance Contract

Newham

Lambeth

Enfield

H&F

Bromley

Hillingdon

TfL

Lin

ked

to N

ational

HE

MP

DfT

Contract

Development

Team:

TfL (3 FTE)

Enfield (1)

Haringey (1)

Lambeth (1)

Camden (1)Joint funding by London

Councils and TfL

Best value for money

from

available funding

Page 20: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Where we want to be

• Partnership thinking and working (“leadership”

and “ownership”)

• Understanding cost

• Orientation towards performance

• Promoting positive outcomes

• Long term thinking and planning

• Looking for wins at all levels – local, borough,

sub-regional, pan-London

Page 21: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Common Specification

Page 22: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Where we want to be

• Partnership thinking and working (“leadership”

and “ownership”)

• Understanding cost

• Orientation towards performance

• Promoting positive outcomes

• Long term thinking and planning

• Looking for wins at all levels – local, borough,

sub-regional, pan-London

Page 23: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Common Specification Benefits

• Reduce pallet of materials

• Reduced stock holding

• Reduced tender costs – both sides

• Reduced depots and empty mile running

• Reduced vehicles – currently London wide

maintenance fleet is estimated at 1500. We could

achieve a 10-20% reduction!

Page 24: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Programme• Development of a common specification contract

- London Highway Alliance Contract LoHAC

• OBCM

• e-auctions for commonly used services and

goods

• Supplier Relationship Development – SRD on

existing contracts

• Highway Management Systems

• Creating the Culture for Delivery

Page 25: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Supplier Relationship Development

• Working with existing borough suppliers

• Supplier and Clients have scored each other out

of 10 against a number of performance attributes

• Looking at work load planning

• Looking at current inspection regimes

• November publication of SRD best practice

document

Page 26: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Programme• Development of a common specification contract

- London Highway Alliance Contract LoHAC

• OBCM

• e-auctions for commonly used services and

goods

• Supplier Relationship Development – SRD on

existing contracts

• Highway Management Systems

• Creating the Culture for Delivery

Page 27: Dana Skelley, Why Change

Questions?


Recommended