CHAPTER 7 CORPORATE
STRATEGY
Daniel Crawford
Mark Engelhardt
Chase Barlow
Alex Bregger
Corporate Strategy
Corporate strategy is concerned with where the firm competes whereas business strategy is concerned with how a firm competes
In this chapter we turn our attention to corporate strategy and the scope of the firms activities.
These include: …
Corporate Strategy
Product Scope – how specialized the firm is in terms of the range of products it supplies. (Coca Cola- soft drinks) (Gap – Fashion retail)
Vertical Scope – the range of vertically linked activities the firm encompasses. (Exxon – active supply chain)
Geographical Scope – the geographic spread of activities for the firm. (Global Vs. Local)
Amazon Strategy
Product Scope: Amazon Prime, Amazon Fresh, Amazon Supply, Amazon Web Services, One Click Purchasing,
Vertical Scope: Amazons goal is to own every step of the internet experience. (Cloud Computing)
Geographical Scope: Amazon is a global company.
Tesco Case
Tesco is a global grocery and general merchandise retailer headquartered in London.
The company was founded in 1919 by Jack Cohen
Tesco made a name for itself by developing a strategy of “piling it high and selling it cheap” in the 50s and 60s
Tesco Case
In 1973 Jack Cohen stepped down and passed the torch to new management
They decided to take on a new strategy and abandon the low price approach.
Expanded the company through new formats; Tesco Extra, Tesco Express, new technology, and acquisition.
Tesco Case
Another change in management and the need to expand further ushered in more new ideas.
Tesco became first UK market to introduce loyalty cards.
Tesco Direct mail ordering company. Tesco Personal Finance in 1997
Tesco Personal Finance
Products initially offered: Credit cards, savings, and insurance.
By 2008 Tesco decided to develop into a full scale bank, offering mortgages, current accounts, and loans.
By 2011 Tesco became third largest retailer In the world by turnover, behind Walmart and Carrefour.
Tesco Strategy
When the company would near its limits of growth. Executives would broaden its scope:Through the use of diversification they
extending its product offeringsAdapting and changing to consumer tastesBuilding its capabilities in house instead of
outsourcing.
The Scope of the Firm
•Deciding ‘what business are we in?’
•Corporate strategic decisions encompasses both firm’s
product range and extent of involvement in the value chain
•Can be defined broadly or narrowly
•Some exclusively focus on one narrow part of the supply
chain, other will extend reach across many supply chain
activities
Key concepts for analyzing firm scope
Key concepts
1. Economics of Scope
2. Transaction Costs
3. Costs of Corporate Complexity
Economics of scope
•The cost economies from increasing the output of multiple products•Economies of scope exists when using a resource across multiple activities uses less of that resource than when the activities are carried out independently •This creates the potential for multi-business firms to gain cost advantage over more specialized businesses
Capabilities vs. Resources Tangible resources Shared service organizations Intangible resources Brand extension Organizational capabilities
Can be exploited by simply selling or licensing the use of the resource or capability
Transaction costs
Forms of Economic Organization •Market Mechanism (visible)•Administrative Mechanism (invisible)
Firms and markets may be viewed as alternative forms for organizing production
Firms are not essential for organizing production Mainframes vs. PC’s If transaction costs of organizing across markets is higher
than administrative costs then, we can expect coordination of productive activity to be internalized within firms
Technology: major source of falling administrative costs Vertical integration doesn’t reduce/ eliminate all
transaction costs
Costs of Corporate Complexity
•Extending firm’s scope of operations by engaging in additional business activities, can reduce transaction costs•This incurs additional management costs •Can outweigh cost savings •Usually requires more organizational capabilities
Diversification The expansion of an
existing firm into another product line or field of operationUnrelated
(conglomerate) diversification
Related (concentric) diversification
Costs and Benefits
Benefits Costs
Growth Risk Reduction Value Creation Economies of Scope Internal Labor Markets
Sometimes against the shareholders interests
Transaction Costs Politicized investment
allocation
Will diversification truly create shareholder value?
Attractiveness and cost-of-entry tests The firm faces the challenge of entering
the new industry The cost of entry may counteract the
attractiveness of the industry
Better-off test
Will the firm be any more profitable? Economies of scope and transaction
costsWill diversification be more profitable than
licensing?
Diversification and performance
How will the diversified firm perform compared to the specialized firm?
Organizational complexity Turbulence of the business environment
Recent Trends in Diversification
Firms in mature industrialized nations have shied away from unrelated diversification
Invested more in their core business While diversification in industrialized
nations is shrinking, more conglomerates are being formed in developing nations
Technology may make diversification more attractive in the future
Vertical Integration
“A firms ownership of vertically related activities”
Indicated by: ratio of a firms value added to its sales revenue (how much it makes rather than buys)
Benefits & Costs
Benefits Cost savings from
physical integration of processes
Ex: linking the two stages of steel sheet production (production & rolling into sheet) at a single location saves energy & transportation costs
Costs Single supplier/Single
Buyer No market price; all
depends on relative bargaining power
Transaction- specific investments result in high transaction costs between both parties
Optimal Scale
Example: FedEx would not produce their delivery trucks in-house to avoid transaction-specific investments but rather to avoid mass inefficiency Amazon does not produce their own
products because they simply do not possess the optimal scale needed for proper efficiency
Designing Vertical Relationships
1. Extent to which buyer/seller commit resources to relationship
Arm’s length/spot contracts: involve no resource commitment beyond single deal
Vertical Integration: involves substantial investment
2. Formality of Relationship Long-term/Franchise:
complex written agreements Spot contracts: bound by
formalities of common law Collaborative Agreements:
informal Vertical Integration: at the
discretion of the firm’s management
Classified in relation to TWO characteristics:
Types of Vertical Relationships
Spot Contracts: one time transaction, requiring no subsequent transactions
Long-term Contracts: Involve series of transactions over time with specifications to each party
Relational Contracts: No written contract; high flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances
Franchising: Contractual agreement between business owner and a permitted investor
Recent Trends in Vertical Integration Past 25 years: Massive shift from spot
contracts to long-term collaborations with fewer suppliers
Outsourcing Involves outsourcings entire chunks of the
value chain rather than individual components or services○ Virtual corporation: coordination of activities
through a network or suppliers & downstream partners
Portfolio Planning
GE/Mckinsey Matrix Strategic variables based on industry
attractiveness & competitive advantage Analysis guides:
Allocation of resources between the businessFormulating business unit strategy: strategic
positioning & opportunitiesAnalyzing portfolio balance: cash flow
generation & growth prospects Setting performance targets
Ashridge Portfolio Display:Potential for Patenting Advantage
Summary
Corp. Strategy: about deciding which business segment to engage in
Clear, long term adaptation to market conditions through diversification
Careful selection deciding which parts of value chain to engage inOutsource/vertically integrate/specific
contracts