Date post: | 06-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | sbruun |
View: | 171 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
Fall 2012
8th Call for NewCenters of Excellence
Excellence – Trust - Transparency
2
Præsentation:
- Head of Manuscript Department, The Royal Library
- Head of Research, The National Museum
- Director, Danmarks Humanistiske Forskningscenter
- Professor, dr.phil., The Danish National Archives,
and affiliated The University of Copenhagen
- Chair of research board, The Ministry of Culture
- Vice president of board, The University of Aalborg
- Board member, The Danish Research Foundation
6. sep 2012
Excellence
Trust
Transparency
Danish National Research Foundation
Focus on people
3 6. sep 2012
Let the best people grapple with the problems they are passionate about, and you set the
stage for real scientific breakthroughs.
DNRF calls for ‘dream projects’
Philosophy of DNRF: Focus on people
4
5
The Danish parliament, Folketinget, established the Danish National Research Foundation in 1991 with capital of 2 billion DKK (≈ 265 million Euros).
In 2008 the foundation was given an extra 3 billion DKK (≈ 400 million Euros) and the capital will be entirely spent by 2026.
The foundation annually distributes up to 400 million DKK (≈ 53 million Euros).
Since 1991 the DNRF has committed itself to supporting Danish research environments with 6 billion DKK (≈ 800 million Euros).
Finance
6. sep 2012
6
The DNRF Activities
6. sep 2012
The DNRF’s primary means to strengthen Danish research:
Other DRNF activities:
Centers of Excellence (CoE)
Niels Bohr Visiting Professorships
DNRF Professorships
International collaboration withMax Planck Society, NSFC, CNRS, NSF
International Talent Recruitment Program
7
Centers of Excellence
6. sep 2012
8
Må have den højeste videnskabelige kvalitet
Må være ambitiøs
Må være original og videnskabeligt nytænkende
Kan inkludere en anvendt forskningsdimension (skal ikke)
Kan have vægt på enten teoretisk dimension eller empirisk
Skal være potentielt nybrydende grundforskning (alle videnskabsområder)
Forskningen - generelt
6. sep 2012
9
Centerlederens drømmeprojekt
Centerleder: ambitiøs, internationalt anerkendt, stærk publikationsprofil, erfaren / nytænkende forskningsleder
Forslaget skal være drevet af:
den gode idé, nysgerrighed og originalitet
spørgsmål og hypotese, ikke beskrivelse
substans, klarhed – og relevans
et klart afsæt i ‘state of the art’
tværvidenskabelighed
Forskningen – Leder og idé
6. sep 2012
10
Centerlederen vælger de folk, han/hun har brug for til at løse forskningsspørgsmålene, ikke andre
Hvis kompetencen ikke er på institutionen, så tænk i rekruttering
2 – 5 gruppeledere, hver med delprojekt, som danner kerne-styregruppen
Tværfaglig ‘gitterstruktur’ (forskellige fag-kompetencer på samme projekt)
Klar ledelsesstruktur med en entydig beslutningskompetence
International rekruttering: Post.docs og Ph.d’er
Fysisk center med samarbejdsrelationer
Advisory Board
Forskningsteam – og organisation
6. sep 2012
11
Ingen fast model
Størrelsen varierer fra 15 til 60 personer
Bevillingen varierer from 36 to 64 mio d.kr. incl. 44 % overhead for en
6-års periode (cf. 7th Call)
Centrene placeret på danske forskningsinstitutioner, som ofte
inkluderer andre danske og/eller internationale institutioner
De fleste centre er inter- og tværdisciplinære
Størrelse og placering af Center of Excellence (CoE)
6. sep 2012
12
Klar vinkling (skal kunne læses og forstås på 10 minutter)
Klar identifikation af den innovative idé og hvorfor netop du/I kan udføre den
Begrundelse for, hvordan du/I bliver en del af den globale top 10 på 6 år
Klar begrundelse for, hvorfor DG-bestyrelsen gør en forskel med bevilling til netop dig/jer
Journalistisk skrivemetode: Gem ej det bedste til sidst!
Give 5 – 20 faglige nøgleord
Husk du/I skriver til DG-bestyrelsen, ej til fagfæller
Forskningen – forslaget til ansøgning (prækvalifikation)
6. sep 2012
13
Life Cycle of a Center of Excellence
Sep 6, 2012
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Call Outline proposals
Prequali-ficationSubmission of full applications
Center start Selected, peer-reviewed applications. Large, flexible grants (6+4 years). Max. 2 grant periods.
Midterm evaluationAfter 5 years, the board decides which centers will continue
1ST PERIOD
Final evaluationAfter 9 years
Annual follow-up meetingsAnnual reports
Year
Potential embedment at host institution2ND PERIOD
14
Call and Prequalification
Sep 6, 2012
Preparation ofoutline proposal, approx. 5 pages
Outline proposals
Board processing
1. Outline proposals are submitted electronically: www.dg.dk
2. The DNRF board processes the letters of interest.
3. A number of qualified applicants are selected.
15
The Selection Process
Sep 6, 2012
Preparation ofoutline proposals, approx. 5 pages
CallOutline proposals
Preparation of applications,approx. 15 pages
Peer review3 international peers per application
Contract phase
Inauguration
Board processing
ApplicationsProcessing
Board processing
16
The Application Phase
Sep 6, 2012
Preparation of applications,approx. 15 pages
Application
The outline proposal is developed into a real research plan for a 6-year period at a maximum of 15 pages, according to the guidelines set by the DNRF.
The application must contain:• a description of the scientific problem and the scientific and social relevance of the problem
• budget
• CVs for core workers
• an organizational plan
• a commitment from the host institution
17
The Processing Phase
Sep 6, 2012
Peer review3 international peers per application
Board processing
Processing For each application, 3 written peer reviews are collected. The peers are internationally recognized within their fields of research.
The international peers are chosen following counseling from national and international research grant-awarding organizations (Danish research councils, ESF and NSF). Applicant may suggest one peer.
The applicant is heard on the composition of the panel and again on the reviews, with an option to comment on them.
The Selection Phase
18 Sep 6, 2012
The DNRF boardchooses the Centers
Contract phase
Inauguration
In the contract phase, the DNRF and the center leader negotiate with the host institution on co-financing and on plans for embedding the center after the end of the DNRF grant.
When processing the applications, the board includes:
the application the peer reviews the applicant’s comments on the peer reviews an interview with the applicant
19 6. sep 2012
A) should be supported;
B) should be conditionally supported, further discussed, clarified, etc;
C) should be rejected; or
P) shows the potential to deliver real transformative or groundbreaking research, even though the proposed endeavor may be considered very risky.
DNRF board: A B C P scores
20
Approx. 140 outline proposals responding to the 5th and 6th call (198 to the 7th call)
Success rate on outline proposals ~ 20%
27 applicants invited to submit full applications in the 7th round (29 in the 6th round and 23 in the 5th round)
Success rate on full applications/final decision ~ 30%
11 new centers have been selected for funding in the 7th round
Overall success rate ~ 6 %
Number of Applications and Success Rates
Sep 6, 2012
21 6. sep 2012
30-40 % success rate15-20 %
success rate
6 % success rate
22
The primary criterion isscientific excellence – peer reviews
6. sep 2012
Fairness ’Equal treatment’ of all proposals No overlap
Quality ‘True peers’ Well argumented reviews (not reduced to numbers, ranking/grading)
Transparency ‘Double open’ Extensive consultation procedure
Basic Principles in Peer Review
23 6. sep 2012
24
Transparent and open process ensures that: the peers have the right scientific profile conflict of interests are exposed the evaluation is high quality and legitimate
But… it is time consuming the wording of the peer reviewers’ opinions are not as direct as in
anonymous reviews.
Transparent Process
Sep 6, 2012
High scientific standing, complementary competencies
One reviewer who has been proposed by the applicant
Extensive consultation process (external sources)
Composition of review ‘panels’
25 6. sep 2012
Some statistics:To get 1 reviewer we need to ask 2-3. 1% declines due to open process60% of all reviews considered A – only 4% C by board in 6. round
26
Centers and Board
6. sep 2012
Centers of Excellence:Strengthening the Organization of Danish Research
The DNRF Centers of Excellence work as role models for increasing the level of:
organization talent nursing talent recruitment training professional administration professional management
in publicly funded research in Denmark
Each center is visited annually by:
Chairman, 1-2 board members, director and research adviser Research progress, financial and administrative/organizational matters
etc. are discussed Every other year informal meetings with postdocs and/or PhD students Selected topics (internationalization, fraud, scientific communication,…)
Annual meetings for all center leaders and board members etc.
Annual reports
Annual follow-up meetings – keeping in close contact
28
29
The DNRF board
Klaus Bock, Chair
Bo Honore
Birte Svensson
Kirsten Hastrup
Eivind Hiis Hauge
Svend Erik Larsen
Gunnar Öquist
Pirjo Nuutila
Birgitte Possing
Thomas SinkjærDirector
List of active Centers of Excellence
Centre for Quantum Optics
Nordic Centre for Earth Evolution
Centre for Individual Nanoparticle Functionality
Centre for Inflammation and Metabolism
Centre for Genotoxic Stress
Centre for Social Evolution
Centre for mRNP Biogenesis and Metabolism
Centre for Insoluble Protein Structures
Centre for Oxygen Microscopy and Imaging
Centre for Viscous Fluid Dynamics
Dark Cosmology Centre
Centre for Language Change in Real Time
Centre for Textile Research
Centre for Models of Life
Danish Arrhythmia Research Centre
Centre for Molecular Movies
Centre for Research in Econometric Analysis of Time Series
Centre for Carbohydrate Recognition and Signalling
Centre for DNA Nanotechnology
Centre for Epigenetics
Centre for Ice and Climate
Centre for Massive Data Algorithmics
PUMPKIN, Membrane pumps in cells and disease
Centre for Autobiographical Memory Research
Centre for Particle Physics & Origin Mass CP3 – Origins
Centre for Particle Physics – DISCOVERY
Centre for Symmetry and Deformation
Centre for Materials Crystallography
Centre for GeoGenetics
Centre for Quantum Geometry of Moduli Spaces
Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate
Centre for Star and Planet Formation
Center for Medieval Literarure
Center for Dynamic Molecular Interactions
Center for Permafrost Dynamics in Greenland
Center for Frictional Finance
Center for Nanostructured Graphene
Center for International Courts
Stellar Astrophysics Centre
Copenhagen Center for Glycomics
Center for Vitamins and Vaccines
Center for Quantum Devises
Center for Geomicrobiology
31
Centers Distributed Among Scientific Fields
Sep 6, 2012
The DNRF has so far funded 88 centers. At the moment 49 centers are active. The centers are funded for up to 10 years, typically with grants of 50-100 million DKK for a 10-year period.
www.dg.dk
33
8th Call. Deadline for outline proposals:
End November 2013
Inauguration of new centers January 1st, 2015
Stiff competition/get through the eye of a needle Big effort The organizational plan must match the research projects Ambitious and original research (potentially ground-breaking) Basic research/frontier research Adequate and flexible funding with long-term time frame
8th Call – Summary
Sep 6, 2012
34
The DNRF board is your target group at first
Explain how the project will redefine science and why exactly your outline proposal/application should get funded
Should be ambitious and original
Ask advice from present and former center leaders
Do not hesitate to contact the DNRF secretariat for advice
Tips for Outline proposals/Application
Sep 6, 2012