Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | faustus-marlas |
View: | 36 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Daquarii J. Rock, Grants Manager
Overview
About Project ACCESS How we got started
• Need?• Developed a plan• Pulling resources
Some challenges Our successes Some effective strategies
• Lessons learned Collaborative
partnerships• Accountability
Sustainability Planning
Project ACCESS Funded by HRSA in
2006• Rural Health Care
Outreach Services Program grant
Seniors (60+) Latah County, ID &
Whitman County, WA• 23 towns (clusters)
3 Area Hospitals 2 Agencies on Aging
Project Focus Transportation Community
Education The Gatekeeper
Program Caregiver Support
How we got started
Who shows a need? Where is the need? Who else has assessed the need in the past?
• Surveys • Focus groups (professionals)• Straw polls
How have others addressed this need in the past? • What worked?• What didn’t?
How can you met this need? Who else in the community is vested in the idea?
• Resources• Partnerships
Working together?
Washington• Pullman Regional Hospital• Whitman Hospital &
Medical Center• Council on Aging &
Human Services (COAST Transportation)
• Washington State University
• Whitman County Libraries• State office of Rural
Health Policy
Idaho• Gritman Medical Center • Area Agency on Aging
(Region II)• University of Idaho• Latah County Libraries• State Office of Rural
Health Policy
Inland Northwest Alzheimer’s Association Western Interstate Commission for Higher
Education (WICHE)
Success! Caregiver Support Groups
13 communities Community buy-in
Transportation 29 Volunteer drivers 1078 miles Matched funds
The Gatekeeper Program All towns trained Community buy-in
Education 340 books and DVDs 36 Dementia Education classes
• Recorded and distributed
Challenges
Rural Culture• Federal dollars
• Federal Anything! Duplication of
services Working together
• History• Healthy
Competition
Community specific needs
Snow! Harvest Season
Working as a collaboration
Make things clear to the group What is our structure? What are our responsibilities? What authority do we have? What other authorities have an interest
(or a “say”) in what we are doing? How do we acknowledge and respect the
restrictions of others in our group? Logistics
What, when, where, who
Accountability
Monthly Palouse Alliance meetings Check-in Concerns Decisions to be made
Bi-weekly “team meetings” Specifics for the team
Work collaboratively* Decision making
Formal Memorandum of Agreement Clear, concise, specific
Healthy Competition
Effective Strategies
Sometimes “the vision” changes to meet the need
Competition can help Egos like to be rubbed
“Social skills” Sometimes people just don’t want to play “It’s not what you know…”
Peer pressure can be a good thing Who do you know?
It takes time, effort, & energy Celebrate success
Program Evaluation
Outcome Evaluation Numbers
• How Many? Process Evaluation
Narrative• Adjustments?• Lessons?
Presented to the group annually
Chris Oakley, Washington State University, Department of Sociology 208-885-4210
Dierdre Rogers, University of Idaho, Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Justice Studies 509-335-5031
Contact Information
Daquarii Rock, Grant [email protected]
Project ACCESS225 E. Palouse River Rd.Moscow, ID 83843208-883-6486
www.accessonthepalouse.org
Questions?