Darwinist evolutionist propaganda techniques. english

Since science totally refutes evolution and since they possess not one

single piece of scientific evidence, Darwinists decided to resort to

hypnosis instead. They developed Darwinist propaganda techniques,

involving part of the press, some professors, teachers and people occupying

senior official positions. They had no hesitations about spreading false reports

depicting evolution as a scientific fact right across the world. They eradicated

objections to evolution through defamation, compulsion, imposition and

menaces. They shamelessly misused science in the name of evolution, even

though all branches of science have refuted it. They managed to bring the

great majority of people to believe in evolution, the worst mass deception in

history, by the use of false reports and hypnosis over the last 150 years.

But the days of that deception are now over! This book you are holding

exposes all the false propaganda spread by Darwinists, who have suffered a

terrible scientific rout, by way of the press in particular. Darwinists will no

longer be able to mislead anyone with false press reports, false broadcasts

and misleading illustrations and will no longer be able to impose this huge

deception on anyone. The next generation will be amazed how people came

to believe in this gigantic fraud and will be amazed to see how people were

held spellbound by it.

By Allah's leave, the 21st century will be when people are completely freed

from this terrible fraud and come to fully live by love of Allah, joy, friendship

and moral virtue.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Adnan Oktar, who writes

under the pen-name Harun Yahya, was born in

Ankara in 1956. Since the 1980s, the author has pub-

lished many books on faith-related, scientific and po-

litical issues. He is well-known as the author of

important works disclosing the imposture of evolu-

tionists, their invalid claims, and the dark liaisons be-

tween Darwinism and such bloody ideologies as

fascism and communism.

All of the author’s works share one single goal: to con-

vey the Qur'an's message, encourage readers to con-

sider basic faith-related issues such as Allah's

existence and unity and the Hereafter; and to expose irreligious systems' feeble

foundations and perverted ideologies. His more than 300 works, translated into 72

different languages, enjoy a wide readership across the world.

By the will of Allah, the books of Harun Yahya will be a means through which

people in the twenty-first century will attain the peace, justice, and happiness

promised in the Qur'an.

1

2

• A special chapter is assigned to the collapse of the theory of evolu-tion because this theory constitutes the basis of all anti-spiritualphilosophies. Since Darwinism rejects the fact of creation—andtherefore, Allah's existence—over the last 150 years it has causedmany people to abandon their faith or fall into doubt. It is thereforean imperative service, a very important duty to show everyone thatthis theory is a deception. Since some readers may find the opportu-nity to read only one of our books, we think it appropriate to devotea chapter to summarize this subject.

• All the author's books explain faith-related issues in light ofQur'anic verses, and invite readers to learn Allah's words and to liveby them. All the subjects concerning Allah's verses are explained soas to leave no doubt or room for questions in the reader's mind. Thebooks' sincere, plain, and fluent style ensures that everyone of everyage and from every social group can easily understand them. Due totheir effective, lucid narrative, they can be read at one sitting. Eventhose who rigorously reject spirituality are influenced by the factsthese books document and cannot refute the truthfulness of their con-tents.

• This and all the other books by the author can be read individu-ally, or discussed in a group. Readers eager to profit from the bookswill find discussion very useful, letting them relate their reflectionsand experiences to one another.

• In addition, it will be a great service to Islam to contribute to thepublication and reading of these books, written solely for the pleas-ure of Allah. The author's books are all extremely convincing. Forthis reason, to communicate true religion to others, one of the most ef-fective methods is encouraging them to read these books.

• We hope the reader will look through the reviews of his otherbooks at the back of this book. His rich source material on faith-re-lated issues is very useful, and a pleasure to read.

• In these books, unlike some other books, you will not find the au-thor's personal views, explanations based on dubious sources, stylesthat are unobservant of the respect and reverence due to sacred sub-jects, nor hopeless, pessimistic arguments that create doubts in themind and deviations in the heart.

3

June, 2011

Published by

GLOBAL PUBLISHING Kayisdagi Mah. Degirmen Sok. No: 3

Ataşehir-Istanbul / TURKEY Phone: (+90 216) 660 00 59

Printed by: Secil Ofset

100. Yil Mahallesi MAS-SIT Matbaacilar Sitesi

4. Cadde No: 77 Bagcilar -Istanbul / Turkey

Phone: (+90 212) 629 06 15

w w w . h a r u n y a h y a . c o m - e n . h a r u n y a h y a . t v

4

Now writing under the pen-name of HARUNYAHYA, Adnan Oktar was born in Ankara in 1956. Hav-ing completed his primary and secondary education inAnkara, he studied fine arts at Istanbul's Mimar SinanUniversity and philosophy at Istanbul University. Sincethe 1980s, he has published many books on political, sci-entific, and faith-related issues. Harun Yahya is well-known as the author of important works disclosing theimposture of evolutionists, their invalid claims, and thedark liaisons between Darwinism and such bloody ideolo-gies as fascism and communism.

Harun Yahya's works, translated into 72 different lan-guages, constitute a collection for a total of more than 55,000pages with 40,000 illustrations.

His pen-name is a composite of the names Harun (Aaron)and Yahya (John), in memory of the two esteemed Prophetswho fought against their peoples' lack of faith. The Prophet'sseal on his books' covers is symbolic and is linked to their con-tents. It represents the Qur'an (the Final Scripture) and ProphetMuhammad (saas), last of the prophets. Under the guidance ofthe Qur'an and the Sunnah (teachings of the Prophet [saas]),the author makes it his purpose to disprove each fundamentaltenet of irreligious ideologies and to have the "last word," so asto completely silence the objections raised against religion. Heuses the seal of the final Prophet (saas), who attained ultimatewisdom and moral perfection, as a sign of his intention to

offer the last word. All of Harun Yahya's works share one single goal: toconvey the Qur'an's message, encourage readers to

consider basic faith-related issues such as Allah'sexistence and unity and the Hereafter; and toexpose irreligious systems' feeble foundations

and perverted ideologies. Harun Yahya enjoys a wide reader-

ship in many countries, from

5

India to America, England to Indonesia, Poland to Bosnia, Spain to Brazil, Malaysiato Italy, France to Bulgaria and Russia. Some of his books are available in English,French, German, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Urdu, Arabic, Albanian, Chinese,Swahili, Hausa, Dhivehi (spoken in Maldives), Russian, Serbo-Croat (Bosnian),Polish, Malay, Uighur Turkish, Indonesian, Bengali, Danish and Swedish.

Greatly appreciated all around the world, these works have been instrumentalin many people recovering faith in Allah and gaining deeper insights into theirfaith. His books' wisdom and sincerity, together with a distinct style that's easy tounderstand, directly affect anyone who reads them. Those who seriously considerthese books, can no longer advocate atheism or any other perverted ideology or ma-terialistic philosophy, since these books are characterized by rapid effectiveness,definite results, and irrefutability. Even if they continue to do so, it will be only asentimental insistence, since these books refute such ideologies from their veryfoundations. All contemporary movements of denial are now ideologically de-feated, by means of the books written by Harun Yahya.

This is no doubt a result of the Qur'an's wisdom and lucidity. The author mod-estly intends to serve as a means in humanity's search for Allah's right path. Nomaterial gain is sought in the publication of these works.

Those who encourage others to read these books, to open their minds and heartsand guide them to become more devoted servants of Allah, render an invaluableservice.

Meanwhile, it would only be a waste of time and energy to propagate otherbooks that create confusion in people's minds, lead them into ideological confu-sion, and that clearly have no strong and precise effects in removing the doubts inpeople's hearts, as also verified from previous experience. It is impossible for booksdevised to emphasize the author's literary power rather than the noble goal of sav-ing people from loss of faith, to have such a great effect. Those who doubt this canreadily see that the sole aim of Harun Yahya's books is to overcome disbelief andto disseminate the Qur'an's moral values. The success and impact of this serviceare manifested in the readers' conviction.

One point should be kept in mind: The main reason for the continuing cruelty,conflict, and other ordeals endured by the vast majority of people is the ideologi-cal prevalence of disbelief. This can be ended only with the ideological defeat ofdisbelief and by conveying the wonders of creation and Qur'anic morality so thatpeople can live by it. Considering the state of the world today, leading into a down-ward spiral of violence, corruption and conflict, clearly this service must be pro-vided speedily and effectively, or it may be too late.

In this effort, the books of Harun Yahya assume a leading role. By the will ofAllah, these books will be a means through which people in the twenty-first cen-tury will attain the peace, justice, and happiness promised in the Qur'an.

6

7

8

INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 10

DARWINIST PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES ..............................14

The Darwinists regularly use the press to bring up the

fraudulent idea that “The missing link has been found.” ..................15

They Use Scientific Terminology and Formulae to

Cast a Magic Spell .........................................................................24

They try to portray all of life as very simple ...................................32

Secret backing is provided for the major press so they will

support Darwinism .........................................................................46

They try to portray evolution as fact by suggesting that

"We have managed to make artificial life” ......................................50

They seek to portray chance as divine

(Surely Allah is beyond that) .........................................................54

They try to distract people with fine detail .....................................56

They try to use similarities as evidence ...........................................60

They apply a comprehensive policy of intimidation against those

who deny evolution ........................................................................64

9

They condition people with the lie that vast masses of people

believe in evolution .................................... ........................................68

They try not to lose supporters by threatening them with

exclusion from society .........................................................................72

They try to give the impression that large numbers of people support

evolution by arranging false polls and statistics ..................................76

They claim to not to be “bothered” by anti-Darwinist activities.............78

They try to cast a spell over people with false illustrations and

reconstructions .......................................... ........................................82

When evidence refuting evolution is discovered,

they either ignore or else try to destroy it ............................................87

In order to maintain their ideology they have even

proposed the idea of space creatures ....................................................90

They try to silence activities demonstrating the invalidity of evolution,

not with scientific evidence, but by shouting the opposition down .........94

The fact they suffer psychological troubles and difficulties is clear

from their behavior and reactions ........................................................96

They maintain that all claims refuting evolution are unscientific ..........98

They try to spread the deception that evolution and belief in

Allah are not incompatible ................................................................104

CONCLUSION ...................................................................................110

All superstition will vanish in the face of Truth ....................................111

The Deception of Evolution ..................................................................114

10

Darwinism is based on ignorance and takes advantage of peo-ple’s lack of knowledge on scientific matters. The Darwinist ideologyis based on establishing preconceptions among the uninformed. Thetechnique used to that end is a type of mass hypnosis achievedthrough frequent repetition and thereby establishing an almost mag-ical effect: this is commonly referred to as indoctrination.

Darwinist indoctrination has duped the whole world, so much sothat a great many people have been turned into passionate devoteesof “evolution,” despite knowing almost nothing at all about the sub-ject. Most of them aren't even aware what they are espousing. Theyhave merely been influenced by pictures of fictitious ape-men walkingever more upright as time passes or reports such as “... our ancestorswere worms” that they see in the daily papers. This indoctrination hasachieved its aims by using these methods. Because of this false suc-cess, nobody has ever thought to ask, “Is there any evidence?” Andindeed, Darwinists have no evidence to submit. For people on the re-ceiving end of this conditioning, evolution has now become an insep-arable part of life they encounter just about everywhere, that theyconstantly come across in major dailies and magazines, that is offi-cially taught in state schools and protected and encouraged in insti-tutions of state, and espoused by world renowned scientists. A blatantfraud has literally been imposed as if it were true by means of condi-tioning, indoctrination and deception.

The sole reason for the 150 years of success enjoyed by Darwin-ism, the worst mass deception in history, is this: Propaganda!

Applied in a systematic manner, Darwinist propaganda, a bla-tant fraud, has expertly been made to dominate the world.

11

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)

Through this propaganda, the false theory of evolution, refuted

by science, has been portrayed as a sole and indisputable scientific

truth to the entire world.

Darwinist indoctrination has been spread by way of a constant

barrage of propaganda, and some people have fallen under its sway

and become unquestioning Darwinists, generally in an unconscious

manner. So much so, that some have become unwitting adherents of

an exceedingly dangerous theory that represents the root of all op-

pressive systems that have inflicted such terrible suffering on the

world and shed so much blood during the 20th century. The 150-year-

old Darwinist deception that has so engulfed the world is solely the re-

sult of this highly organized propaganda.

In this book you will see evidence of how Darwinists make use of

the propaganda techniques in question and perpetrate mass indoctri-

nation. The newspaper headings cited throughout the book are

intended to show how Darwinists employ parts of the press, a

part of their propaganda weapon, and shamelessly dissem-

inate false and deceptive reports. These captions are very

important in terms of deciphering this false propaganda

and in helping readers understand the kind of Darwin-

ist deception they are up against and in enabling them to

assess subsequent reports in the light of a true per-

spective.

The aim of this book is to expose the Darwinist

fraud and to show how Darwinists have blatantly mis-

led people. It is to show how people have been conditioned

and lied to for 150 years. The book you are holding constitutes

significant evidence of how Darwinism is a fraud and why it is,

when there are 350 million fossils which all refute

evolution, and yet the whole world has been

told that not even a single protein can form

Darwinist Propaganda Techniques

12

13


by chance. Despite the evidence to the contrary, the evolutionist the-

ory is still widespread among governments, schools, universities,

much of the press and some scientists.

The Darwinism refuted by science will now suffer yet another de-

feat as its propaganda techniques are exposed. The 21st century will

be the era when despite all the means, material support, press backing

and propaganda employed by the Darwinists, evolution will suffer its

most severe collapse and be finally annihilated. The 21st century will

be the era when all pagan religions are eliminated, a century that man-

ifests our Almighty Lord’s title of Hadi (He Who leads to guidance):

Almighty Allah reveals in verses:

... and you have seen people entering Allah’s religion in droves,then glorify your Lord’s praise and ask His forgiveness. He isthe Ever-Returning. (Surat an-Nasr, 2-3)

14

15


The Darwinists regularly use the press to bring up the

fraudulent idea that “The missing link has been found.”

At the heart of the Darwinist propaganda techniques is the con-

stant repetition of a lie, just as in Nazi Germany. This method, known

as “The Big Lie Technique”, employed successfully by the Nazi minis-

ter of propaganda, Dr. Joseph Goebbels, has been comprehensively uti-

lized with the aim of spreading Darwinism. With the constant repetition

of this lie, not only scientists, and world famous newspapers and mag-

azines adopted it, but some ignorant people also came to believe it as

well. That is the climate in which Darwinism grew and flourished.

Because of this propaganda technique, people have been hearing

the same tale for years: "The missing link has been found", "The miss-

ing link has come to light" or "The missing link is complete!"... The

whole world is by now familiar with headlines about fictitious evolu-

tionary missing links that have never been discovered. The reason for

this is because Darwinists keep administering this indoctrination in

specific doses… That is the aim behind the repetition, to ensure the

Darwinist spell maintains its influence over people.

When the invalidity of Darwinism is exposed, when people are

told there is no such thing as a missing link, an air of panic sets in

among Darwinist circles. In that event, the tempo of repetition (by way

of the press) is increased. Darwinists either come up with a sensational

claim or else intensify their reports about supposed missing links. The

dosage is stepped up in a moment. Whatever falsity is needed to pre-

vent the spell being broken is brought up. Fossils of extinct life forms

are used for this false propaganda. Darwinist scientists spring into ac-

tion and these reports are supported to the maximum possible extent

by TV programs, Darwinist journals and documentaries.

Ida, for example, is a stunning fraud produced under the influ-

ence of one such episode of panic. The way that a lemur fossil was

taken and shamelessly heralded to the whole world as an ancestor of

man is truly a shocking phenomenon. The way that this fossil was her-

alded through brazen propaganda and false slogans as if it were the

eighth wonder of the world, and all the wide-ranging furor about it

was a clear expression of the Darwinists’ worry and despair. A great

many Darwinists were forced to make explicit statements about how

embarrassing they found all this furor. And when, following all this

false propaganda, it was finally revealed that Ida was merely a lemur,

apologies were duly issued and all claims hastily retracted.

16


The way that a lemur fossil and a Bonobomonkey can be misrepresented as ances-tors of man in the Darwinist press is trulyshocking. Darwinists have had to apolo-gize for this shameless propaganda.

Ida

17


Ida is not the only example. Such sensations have become com-

mon of late due to the terrifying effects of the rise of Darwinism. Fol-

lowing Ida, Ardi was produced as a result of that same despair, and a

monkey fossil was heralded as the ancestor of man. But this sensation

was short-lived, and all claims were again retracted when it was de-

clared to be simply a monkey.

Claims are constantly being taken back, and will continue to be

retracted in the future. Because all reports about “missing links being

found” are lies. More than 300 million fossils have been unearthed to

date, yet not a single one is a transitional fossil. Despite all the calls

and invitations, not one single Darwinist has managed to produce one

single transitional fossil. The more this most intensive propaganda

technique on which Darwinism relies is eliminated and exposed, the

more Darwinists are suffering their real defeat. Their frauds are being

exposed one by one.

The Ardi and Ida appeared under these headlines in part of the press. The aim was to maintain evolutionary propaganda with false news reports.

18


Charles Beard, a paleontologist from the Johns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Museum of Natural History: "This fossil is not as close to mon-keys, apes, and humans as we are being led to believe."1

Duke University paleontologist Richard Kay admits that, "there is no sci-entific analysis to prove that Ida is a missing link," IN OTHER WORDS,THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR IT AT ALL.2

Timesonline carried the following admission: "Attenborough ... was justone element of the media circus turning Ida into humanity’s newest andbest link with its ancient past." "Such finds are usually unveiled to theworld through the sober pages of an academic journal, but for Ida nothingless than a glittering press conference at the American Museum of NaturalHistory in New York would do. Later the scientists who studied Ida out-lined the details of their research. Their pronouncements were just as ex-travagant."3

Richard Foley, a professor of human evolution at Cambridge University,said that, "it is ‘meaningless’ to describe this creature as a missing link."4

"Dr. Simons phoned me for the first time in 10 years to share his outrageabout this MALARKEY and, for the first time in a decade, I agree withhim,” said Beard last week. “...The roll-out was extraordinary and it is nowclear that the scientists were under pressure to meet the showbusinessdeadlines."

Simons had said: "It’s absurd and dangerous. … This is all bad science...Darwinius is a wonderful fossil, but IT IS NOT A MISSING LINK OFANY KIND. IT REPRESENTS A DEAD END IN EVOLUTION."

Darwinist confessions regarding the Ida deception

1 The Missing Link? Nightline, ABC News television, May 20, 2009. The MissingLink? Nightline, ABC News television, May 20, 20092 Gibbons, A. "Revolutionary" Fossil Fails to Dazzle Paleontologists. ScienceNOWDaily News. Posted on sciencenow.sciencemag.org May 19, 2009, accessed May20, 20093 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6350095.ece4 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article6350095.ece

19

www.guardian.co.uk/science/

The Ida fraud was launchedwith a huge fanfare in the press,and Isa was intensively usedfor Darwinist propaganda pur-poses. The missing link wasshamelessly maintained untilthe fraud was exposed.

20

://blogs.abcnews.com/scienceandsociety/

www.nature.com/news/

Newsweek, 23 August 1999

New Scientist, 09.09.2006

News, 8 April 2006

21

Reports of this kind, such as the supposed“discovery of evolution’s missing link,” areone of the main techniques that Darwinistsgenerally employ to spread their propaganda.Since Darwinists have no evidence to supporttheir idea of evolution, they seek to maintainthe same spell over people by fraudulentlypersisting with such headlines. At times whenthey have suffered severe defeats in particu-lar, they show people the “missing link dis-covered” captions from Darwinist publicationsand support that lie with illustrations sugges-tive of evolution. They have been using thathypnotic technique for the last 150 years. Mil-lions of people reading these reports over theyears have imagined that evolution and themissing link genuinely exist. Until the true faceof the evolution deception was unmaskedthrough the works of Harun Yahya, that is...

Tim

e, 3

May

199

9

Science & Vie, October 1999

New Scientist, 1 Jan 2005

22

New Scientist, 11 September 2004

Time, 3 May 1999

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/11/06/dolphinlegs_ani.html

New Scientist, July 2001

www.metro.co.uk/news/23906-four-

legged-dolphin-found

Focus, July 2002

Time, 6 April 1998

The Newyork Times National, 24 June 1998

Time, 7 May 2001

23

For someone who is unaware that evolution is a fraud, these reports in well-known newspaper, accompanied by fossil illustrations and scientific terminologyand formulae may well be misleadingly convincing. The fact is, however, that allreports of a “missing link” are specious. THERE EXISTS NOT ONE SINGLE TRAN-SITIONAL FOSSIL SUPPORTING EVOLUTION. No such missing link has everbeen found, and it is impossible for one ever to be found. Because living thingsNEVER EVOLVED. ALLAH CREATED THEM ALL.

New Scientist, 25 Jan 2003

Science & Vie, November 1998


The Australian, 5 April 2010

Newsweek, 23 August 1999

News, 27 June 2005

They Use Scientific Terminology and Formulae

to Cast a Magic Spell

The fact that all false reports regarding the theory of evolution

are issued in the name of science, published in Darwinist scientific

journals, taught as science in biology classes in school curricula, and

that the adherents of evolution constantly refer to themselves as “sci-

entific”, has had a huge effect on conditioning people. As a result of

this intensive Darwinist conditioning, rejection of evolution is por-

trayed as equivalent to rejecting science itself. Evolution is taught by

means of imposition and calling it science.

But the fact is that Darwinism has nothing to do with science. Sci-

ence is the enemy of Darwinism. Science is opposed to atheism. Sci-

ence is anti-communist and anti-Marxist. Science obliterates Marxist,

atheist and Darwinist thinking. Every branch of the sciences has re-

futed evolution. Science has demolished the Darwinist deception; sci-

ence has completely discredited evolution. Microbiology, genetics,

molecular biology, zoology, paleontology, in short, all branches of life

science, have proved the invalidity of evolution. Darwinists have suf-

fered their worst defeat at the hands of science. It is therefore a terri-

ble deception for evolution to be taught as if it were scientific, as

science is for those who believe in Allah; it benefits true believers.

Yet, despite all these facts, the Darwinists’ main vehicle of de-

ception is science. They are unwilling to abandon this indoctrination.

That is why they utilize plenty of scientific terminology and formulae

in the deceptive reports they publish in Darwinist science magazines

in order to give the impression they are providing readers with highly

significant, inaccessible, and complex information.

Latin words are the star performers among the Darwinists’ reper-

toire of deceptive techniques. Darwinists imagine that by bestowing

Latin names on false fossils or freshly minted false theories that this

24


25


will somehow enhance their credibility. Yet there is no scientific evi-

dence behind anything they say. But some people who listen to those

who employ lots of Latin words fall for this supposedly scientific show

and imagine they are dealing with impossibly inaccessible knowledge.

They imagine they cannot possibly understand the subject, that it is

best left to scientists, and that everything they say must be true. This

conditioning is so powerful that failing to go along with the scientists

in question is perceived of as serious irrationality. That is how the pro-

found enchantment of people is established.

Master Bediuzzaman Said Nursi, the greatest Islamic scholar of

the last thousand years, described how Darwinist conditioning of and

influence over people had become a scourge affecting vast masses of

people:Materialism is a spiritual plague which has infected man with a fearsome

fever, causing him to be visited by Divine wrath. The more the ability to

inculcate and criticize expands, so does that plague spread.1

As Bediuzzaman, the Master, notes, this conditioning is utterly

deceptive. The formulae, Latin words and scientific terminology em-

ployed by Darwinists are all false. The scientists in question are also

well aware that they are espousing a fraud. Darwinists are merely

using science to put on a scientific circus. When the true facts of all the tales they have manufactured is

brought to light they have to swiftly take back all the fossils they havespent so many pages describing in Darwinist publications until thattime. The infamous Piltdown Man (also known by the invented Latinname Eoanthropus dawsoni) fraud, which was the result of attaching anorangutan jaw to a human skull and adding a few teeth to it, was thesubject of more than 40 “scientific” doctoral theses; the Nebraska Manfraud, based on a single pig tooth, depicted in illustrations even to theextent of its supposed family and taught in text books for many yearsunder the name Hesperopithecus haroldcookii, as if it were “scientific”

26

Scientific American, May 2002

Evolution on island outpaced that on the mainland

Birgün, 20 September 2006

Males wore “decorations” 50,000 years ago

Star, 12. 01. 2010T

he

form

ula

of

evo

luti

on

dis

cove

red

Hü

rriy

et, 0

3. 0

9. 1

999

Man is not monogamous, but a serial monogamist Hürriyet, 10 04. 2001

27

Science is anti-evolution and anti-Darwinist. Every branch of science definitivelyrefutes evolution. The heaviest blow dealt to the theory of evolution in the 21st

century came from science. But evolution amazingly still claims to be scientific.It uses science to disseminate its false propaganda. It tries to make its hypno-sis more effective by sprinkling false news reports with scientific terminology.But the fact is that these scientific terminology and formulae in Darwinist pub-lications have nothing to do with the reports themselves.

Sto

ne

Ag

e m

an w

as a

lso

“se

lf”-

ish

Sta

r, 2

7. 0

2. 2

009

Genetic map of “an evolutionary accident” producedBirgün, 9 May 2008

Is “Indigo children” a new link in the evolution-

ary process?

Hürriyet, 17 May 2005

28

Vertebrates have been speaking for 400 years

Birgün, 19 August 2008

Had it not been for schizophrenia, we would still be monkeys

Hürriyet, 20. 03. 2001

The evolution of friendshipBirgün, 15 August 2005

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3225729/Stone-Age-man-took-drugs-say-scientists.html

www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2001/mar/18/education.highereducation

Men spoke firstHürriyet Bilim, 12. 10. 2002

Even Stone Age man had a drug dependency!Birgün, 20. 10. 2008

29

Someone who is uninformed on the subject and looks at these false reportsabout evolution under such headlines may well form the impression from thecaptions and illustrations that he is dealing with scientific data emerging fromvarious pieces of legitimate research. But all these reports are fictitious. No sci-entific research has produced any such data. The only conclusion emergingfrom scientific research is the fact that evolution never took place at any timein history. Indeed, it is the revelation of that fact before the eyes of the world thathas most devastated Darwinists.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/im-ages/0674021924/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF

8&n=283155&s=books

The marathon and evolution!Evrensel, 24 October 2004

The Neanderthal inside us wants to dance!

Radikal, 02 June 2006

The aging clock has been set backHürriyet, 29. 04. 2000

New Scientist, 26 June 2006

30

Man is a genetic error!

Radikal, 26 March 2004

Researchers seeking an answer to “why human beings lost their fur.”

Cumhuriyet, 20 August 2003

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=latest-theory-human-body-hair

Gestures are inherited, not social: Researchers emphasizethat facial expressions stem from evolutionary genetic paths

Birgün, 19. 10. 2006

Lice forced human beings to wear

clothes

Hürriyet, 20 August 2003

31

One of the distinguishing features of Darwinists is the way that they laugh atpeople and shamelessly impose their utterly ludicrous reports on them. SinceDarwinists have been doing this and gathering support in this way for the last150 years, they imagine they can persist in the same fraud now by making useof the press. But it is not impossible for them to succeed.

Is the “hmmmm” sound underwater the basis of

speech? Radikal, 19. 07. 2008

The most beautiful woman

3 million years ago

Akşam, 16. 01. 2003

New Scientist, 24 May 2008

New Scientist, 16 October 1999

Science Vie, 01 Oct 2000

The first murder was committed in theStone Age

Hürriyet, 04 August 2009

32


The cell that Darwin in the 19th century imagined to be a balloon filled withwater, has actually turned out to be more complex than the city of NewYork, one of the 21st century’s greatest metropolises. It is impossible for asingle protein inside the cell to form by chance, let alone the cell itself.

evidence for evolution; the Australopithecus afarensis fraud, to giveit its made-up Latin name, that subsequently transpired to be noth-ing but an ape; the Archaeoraptor liaoningensis fraud, the result offive different fossils being put together and depicted as a dinosaurpreparing to take flight in all Darwinist publications, and finallythe Ida fraud, a lemur heralded for a while as the ancestor of man,are just a few instances of this deception.

Each one of these is a fraud published in the world’s most re-spected scientific journals citing world famous scientists as refer-ences and making plentiful use of Latin terminology. Unless thetrue facts of these frauds are exposed, they will astonishingly main-tain their places in school textbooks and scientific journals and bedefended by people bearing the title of “scientist.” Darwinism is aserious danger and a deception that makes use of scientists, scien-tific journals, the TV and newspapers.

They try to portray all of life as very simple

Darwinists’ deception techniques are generally based on notpermitting people to think. One of the most effective ways of doingthis, they foolishly imagine, is to completely ignore the extraordi-nary complexity of life and portray is as really very “simple.”

Darwinists say that, "The cell came into being in muddywater.” They try to deceive people with the idea of the cell “form-ing in muddy water,” despite being at a complete loss to explainhow a single protein might have formed by chance and are stillstriving to fully unravel the mystery of the cell in the most techni-cally advanced laboratories.

33

34

Our ancestor the germHürriyet, 08. 03. 1998

Man is turned out to be 80% oxRadikal, 25 April 2009

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2007/02/27-02.html

Our ancestors were bird feed!Radikal, 14 Jan 2006

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1086928/Kangaroos-closely-related-humans-scientists-claim.html

Chimpanzees and man had a common forebear 4 billion years ago

Radikal, 25 February 2007

35

Life is extraordinarily complex. A single cellis a whole living world, the details of whichhave still not been fully unraveled. Darwin-ists have suffered their worst defeat in theface of a single protein in the cell. They areunable to account for even a single protein.The reports of evolution that Darwinistsmanufacture using fields such as genetic re-search, genetics and DNA, are thereforehugely specious. The science of geneticshas demolished evolution. The subject ofthe beginning of life has inflicted the worstcollapse on Darwinists. No scientific re-search has ever produced any of the resultsclaimed in Darwinist publications. All of thereports in question are fraudulent.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/prehistoric_life/

human/human_evolution/http://io9.com/#!5083673/princeton-scientists-

discover-proteins-that-control-evolution

Time, 18 Oct 1999

Time, 23 August 1999

http://www.selamta.net/Lucy.htm

36

Scientific American, October 2003

Focus, Jul 2002

Scientific American, March 2003

Time, 18 Oct 1999

Time, 27 June 2005

Newsweek, Feb 2003Scientific American, April 1997

37

Science Vie, Aout 1998

Time, 20 October 1996

Stern, December 2004

Scientific American, Jan 2003

All evolutionist claims are irrational and illogical.Small dinosaurs can ever suddenly turn intobirds as they run along the ground. The fact itcan run fast is not the only difference between amonkey and man. Neither anteaters nor wormsnor bacteria are related to human beings. Life isfar too complex to be explained with these fan-tastical Darwinist claims. Darwinists try to givethe impression in the kind of headlines shownabove that life is really very simple. Because theythink that the simpler life is, the easier it will befor them to spread the idea that “everything cameabout by chance.” They have misled people withsuch conditioning for many years. But modernscience that has shown the complexity in a sin-gle cell has now spelled the end of Darwinism.

Darwinists also claim that fish emerged onto dry land and grad-

ually turned into amphibians, that reptiles suddenly grew wings and

began to fly, that bears turned into whales while romping by the shore

– which is Darwin’s own claim, and that chimpanzees (or, since Dar-

winists regard the words chimpanzee or monkey as slightly dis-

paraging, fictitious “ape-like creatures,” as they themselves put it)

turned into scientists, professors, and scholars who examine their own

brain cells in laboratories. The glorious complexity in life is a huge

dead-end for Darwinists. The only way out for them, is to explain

everything in terms of chance; to depict life and the complexity within

it as actually very “simple.”

To that end, the idea that Darwinists want to condition people

with is essentially this: Muddy water + chance + time = Life! Ac-

cording to Darwinists, when coincidences, to which Darwinists at-

tribute a creative power, combine together they can work miracles

(surely Allah is beyond that) and turn life forms into one another, no

matter how impossible that may actually be. The Darwinist claim is a

ludicrous one that seeks to portray everything as very simple.

38


The imaginary formula that Darwinists use to account for thecomplex structures and huge variety of life on Earth.

IMAGIN

ARY

IMAGIN

ARY

39

This is a cunning act of indoctrination performed on people. This

indoctrination has such an effect on some people that they are imme-

diately able to believe in utterly nonsensical concepts. They are able to

believe that man is a slightly more developed form of chimpanzee,

that fish can emerge onto dry land and turn into terrestrial life forms

when they so choose, that a cell can really form in

muddy water and that dinosaurs managed to

grow wings and turn into birds. That is be-

cause they have been so thoroughly indoctri-

nated, almost to the level of brainwashing.

This constant indoctrination is worked into

them by well-known professors, wielding

incomprehensibly strange formulae and pe-

culiar scientific terminology on the covers

of world famous magazines.

The fact is that there is nothing “sim-

ple” about life at all. Everything set out

40



under this indoctrination is a lie. With all of its infrastructure and or-

ganization, a single cell is far more complex than a giant metropolis

such as New York City. Despite much wide-ranging laboratory re-

search over the last few years, only a very small part of this extraor-

dinary structure has been clarified. But there is no way in which it can

be replicated. Not one of the thousands of proteins in the cell can be

artificially manufactured. Living things are literally works of art in

terms of their complexity, sensitivity, symmetry, order, detail, equip-

ment and systems. For that reason, the simplistic explanations offered

by Darwinism’s adherents are simply intended to deceive.

In relating all of this nonsense, Darwinists are of course well

aware that there is nothing simple in life. They are of course well

aware that not a single cell can spontaneously emerge from muddy

water, let alone a complex, multi-cell organism, and that a fish can

never emerge onto dry land and start flying. We must not forget that

Darwinists relate these accounts for purposes of casting a psycholog-

ical spell; a kind of hypnosis. Moreover, the Darwinists who so shame-

lessly do all this are quite unable to account for how even a single

protein came into being. This represents a huge and absolute defeat for

Darwinists right from the beginning. One must never forget this

fact as one listen to Darwinist fairy tales.

In terms of their complexity, sensitivity, symmetry, order,details, equipment and systems, living things are literallyworks of art. These works of art indicate the existence of asublime Artist, the Might of our Lord Allah. Darwinists areperfectly well aware that all entities are created works ofart. But they are reluctant to abandon their ideology. Thatis the main reason why they seek to disseminate their ut-terly ridiculous claims, in the full knowledge of how fraud-ulent they are.

41

42

Time, 17 April 2006

http://schansblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/we-evolved-from-fruit-flies-and.html

http://www.livescience.com/98-runner-high-jog-

ging-separated-humans-apes.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/647139.stm

43

It was easy to produce fictitious re-ports in the name of science in Dar-win’s time. Because science wasexceedingly primitive then. Peoplereally were able to believe, fromnewspaper headlines, that we are re-lated to the fly, that chimpanzees are“our cousins” and that we are closerelatives of the horse. However, sci-ence has challenged the theory ofevolution in a way that Darwinistsnever expected. These ludicrousclaims by Darwinists have been an-nihilated in the face of science. Thesepropaganda techniques thereforemerely disgrace Darwinists.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2002-04/aaft-uoa040402.php

Sciences et Avenir, May 2003

Philippines Daily, 09.08.2007

http://io9.com/#!5597276/meet-your-true-ancestor-the-segmented-worm

44

Time, 23 Dec 1996

Time, 29 March 1999

News, 11 June 2005

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=latest-theory-human-body-hair

45

Darwinists want people to be ignorant and un-informed. They want to be able to misleadthem with utterly nonsensical reports. Theyseek to condition them with the idea that imag-inary formulae such as “time+chance+mud”are enough to account for the glorious varietyand perfection in the living world. That is theterrible nonsense that Darwinism is. Headlinesin the newspapers in question are their great-est weapon in spreading this foolish logic.They try to hypnotize people who are ignorantof the subject. It is largely through these falsepress reports that Darwinism has been able tomaintain its dominion over the last 150 years.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sci-ence/2004/dec/29/evolution.science

Times of Malta, 11 August 2007

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6057734.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8012322.stm

Secret backing is provided for the major press

so they will support Darwinism.

Darwinists have been making propaganda through the press for

150 years and have used the press for all of their psychological condi-

tioning techniques. If they didn't control such a major force as the

press, it would be impossible for the Darwinist dictatorship to have es-

tablished a false dominion across the world and for the nonsense of

evolution to have found its way into institutions of state, schools and

universities.

The first decision for Darwinism to be disseminated by the press,

to make such a fantastical idea in some way believable, was taken in

a senior masonic lodge made up of atheist freemasons in Darwin’s

time. Members of the 33rd Degree Mizraim Freemasonry Supreme

Council in Paris announced the need for evolution to be supported by

depicting it as science, but had no qualms about ridiculing the theory

amongst themselves; It is with this object in view that we are constantly by means of our press,

arousing a blind confidence in these theories. The intellectuals... will puff

themselves up with their knowledge and without any logical verification of

them will put into effect all the information available from science, which

our agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of ed-

ucating their minds in the direction we want. Do not suppose for a moment

that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we

arranged for Darwinism...”2

Thus it was that Darwinism spread to the masses of people in the

light of this decision taken at a French lodge made up of atheist freema-

sons. Ever since then it has always been under the atheist Freemasons’

protection. Atheist freemasons, who have established a global domin-

ion and therefore possess a press army capable of shaping the world as

they choose, can thus produce whatever reports they wish, raise

46


47


whichever subjects they choose, and thus manage people as they de-

sire. This cunning policy of management continues to this day.

Successes in eliminating Darwinism make atheist masons very

uneasy. At such times they immediately embark on an intensive pol-

icy of conditioning, as already described, through the press. The Dar-

winist press is immediately unleashed and a false fossil is immediately

discovered. A Darwinist scientist is trotted out, and tall tales are writ-

ten about this fossil. That is how the atheist freemasons’ system works.

It is noteworthy as to why reports about Darwinism are sup-

ported by certain sections of the press. The press in question produces

their reports solely in line with the instructions they receive from athe-

ist freemasons, and not because of any scientific fats, data or informa-

tion. This needs to be borne in mind in evaluating the false, global

dominion of the Darwinist deception.

Under the control of atheistmasons, the major press fre-

quently carries reports em-phasizing the nonsense that

is evolution.

48

http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/786/first-land-vertebrates-may-have-suffocated

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2006/apr/06/evolution.fossils

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/evolu-

tion/7550033/Missing-link-between-man-and-apes-

found.html

The Press, 10 August 2007

Science Vie, Jul 2003

49

Ever since the time of Darwin, part of themajor press has been given the task ofdisseminating Darwinist indoctrination.The Darwinists of the time were well awarethat the theory of evolution would never becorroborated by any scientific evidence,but produced a Darwinist dictatorship asthe result of systematic and organized ac-tivities and charged part of the majorpress with spreading the fraud. The pressin question is still at work today. The onlydifference is that the Darwinist fraud theyperpetrate has now been exposed.

Scientific American, May 2003

New Scientist, 19 April 2008

Science, 2 April 2004

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2008-04-24-trex-chicken-dna_N.htm

They try to portray evolution as fact by suggesting

that "We have managed to make artificial life”.

There is a great deal of evidence refuting Darwinism. But the fun-

damental issue that demolishes the theory evolution is the beginning

of life. As we have reiterated many times and insist on keeping on the

agenda, Darwinists are unable to explain how even a single protein

might have come into being by chance. This is where the theory of

evolution falls apart.

In order to neutralize this terrible defeat, Darwinists again resort

to their press monopoly. The most familiar means of deception on this

subject are scenarios about artificial life. Reports in the publishing or-

gans in question that appear from time to time along the lines of “We

have made artificial blood,” “We have made artificial evolution,” “We

have manufactured artificial DNA,” “Synthetic life is on the way,” or

“An artificial cell has been manufactured” are part of these psycho-

logical defense mechanisms.

People who are uninformed on the subject may form the impres-

sion from such reports that the greatest obstacle in Darwinism’s way,

the question of the beginning of life, has been resolved. They naively

assume that “today they have made a cell, so tomorrow they may build

human beings.” Indeed, the Darwinists’ aim in producing such reports

is to baffle people and numb their brains with this sinister hypnosis.

But there is a deception going on here. Nobody has ever, and can

never come anywhere close to creating something out of nothing. That

is impossible, unless Allah so wills it. What scientists are doing is to

use already existing blood, DNA and cells and, most important of all,

intelligence, and use these in laboratory research. Darwinists can de-

scend to the deepest point possible if they so wish, right down to the

level of the atom, but an intelligence has still been employed there and

they will make use of already existing atoms. These results, the work

50


51


of thousands of scientists, technological laboratories, the expenditure

of millions of dollars and countless experiments, have only been pos-

sible with enormous hard work and intelligence. In other words, in-

telligence is essential. But the result is still not evolution.

Taking nucleotides inside DNA and synthesizing a cell in a dif-

ferent way is a new procedure performed using intelligence within

the existing system. It is a great success for science, and a major de-

velopment that will hopefully lead the way for important advances in

science and medicine; but it is very definitely not evolution. Evolution

has collapsed right from the very beginning; the subject of the origin

of life. The inability to account for the chance formation of even a sin-

gle protein spells the end for all Darwinist claims.

Darwinists’ deception techniques have always been rather

wretched ones. That means it is very easy to decipher those techniques

and counteract the conditioning involved. The quasi-magical effect that

Darwinists have obtained using propaganda techniques for decades

now can be demolished in a single move. There is no doubt that, as

Allah has promised, victory will always go to the supporters

of Allah. Our Almighty Lord says in one verse that:

As for those who make Allah theirfriend, and His Messenger andthose who believe: it is the partyof Allah who are victorious!(Surat al-Ma’ida, 56)

52

FROM SEAWEED TO MAN

Bilim Teknik, September 1979

Evolution approved at the molecular levelRadikal, 9 April 2006

Now it is time for the organism

Cumhuriyet, 22 May 2010

http://www.pizaazz.com/2010/06/17/worlds-

first-synthetic-organism/

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/5409946/scientists_create_artificial_life_a.html

http://www.sinfest.net/phpbb2/view-topic.php?p=326543&sid=94488980c2

bf62284d4439842ba2e2f0

53

It is certainly a great feat of science to take structures already existing in a livingthing and make an artificial “copy” under the supervision of conscious beings,under conscious conditions, as the result of years of laboratory research. But ITIS DEFINITELY NOT EVOLUTION. No DNA or protein has been created out of noth-ing, and no new information that did not exist before has been added to the sys-tem. Instead of using scientific advances that have nothing to do with evolution,Darwinists should first explain how a single protein might have come into being bychance. That is the great question that terrifies Darwinists and that they can neveranswer. Therefore, all the Darwinist speculation about artificial copies and clonesis completely specious.

http://www.dailytech.com/Scientist+Craig+Venter+Has+Created+Artificial+Life/article16619.htm

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/328/5981/958.full

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10132762

They seek to portray chance as divine

(Surely Allah is beyond that)

Darwinists make use of unbelievably illogical scenarios in order to

deceive people. There are no boundaries to these scenarios; thousands of

different life forms come from a single cell, reptiles suddenly take to the

air from dry land and turn into birds, and worms gradually turn into

human beings. According to the Darwinists, the power that causes these

transitions to occur in this rather embarrassing scenario is “chance.” This

is how the Darwinists have deceived people for so many years.

Evolutionists have maintained this ever since Darwin’s time, or

even since the days of Samaria. The idea of chance is an embarrass-

ment that represents the foundation of the theory of evolution and is

a source of terrible shame for the Darwinists.

But following the exposure of the wretched, illogical and ludi-

crous nature of this claim, especially through the Atlas of Creation,

Darwinists suddenly began speaking very differently. In order to

avoid further embarrassing themselves by trying to defend this

shameful claim, they adopted an even more illogical defense mecha-

nism. Now, when Darwinists are asked,

“Do you think that it was chance that

created everything?” they reply, “We

never said it was chance.” Then when

54


55


asked, “If it was not chance, then what was it?” they adopt the highly

irrational and infantile defense of referring to “... a process arising as

the result of a number of coincidences.” This is an explicit and clear

sign of how invalid Darwinists’ foundations really are.

We have already seen how Darwinists foolishly try to give the

impression of providing scientific accounts by using scientific termi-

nology and formulae in order to mislead people. They also try to por-

tray the deceptive idea of chance as perfectly legitimate by using the

same methods. The lie of a dinosaur growing wings and taking flight,

so often repeated in Darwinist publications, is described with a fre-

quent usage of Latin verbiage and terminology, thus giving the story

a supposedly scientific veneer. Yet, in the fictitious process in ques-

tion and this unbelievably ridiculous tale, there is no intelligence ca-

pable of making informed, conscious interventions, directing the

course of events, choosing the best course by making logical deduc-

tions, making choices, making logical inferences and distinguishing

the proper thing to do. Darwinism rejects the existence of such a con-

sciousness. Everything in the myth of evolution happened uncon-

sciously, unintelligently, as the result of blind chance. Chance is the

Darwinists’ false god, one that works miracles, creates from noth-

ing, makes no errors and is able to predict future events and take

appropriate precautionary measures.

Darwinists seek to portray this false god as a creative force, at

least in their own eyes (surely Allah is beyond that). And by means of

these cunning statements they try to turn people away from belief in

Allah. The Darwinist magic spell, as it were, is the underlying reason

why people gradually turn toward atheism, and why so many Dar-

winists are engaged in a merciless struggle against belief in Allah.

Whether they are aware of it or not, believers in Darwinism fall under

the hypnotic spell of the false idol, chance, and inevitably abandon be-

lief in Allah.

They try to distract people with fine detail

Confusing details and ridiculous reports represent an important

part of Darwinist psychological defense mechanisms. Inundating peo-

ple with illogical details is one part of the Darwinist's hypnotic in-

doctrination technique. The real aim behind reports appearing in

Darwinist publications is to make some people, who have little knowl-

edge of the subject, forget that evolution is a fraud and thereby occupy

their minds with exceedingly foolish questions, such as, “Are we more

closely related to the potato or the worm?” Darwinists use illogical

details for that purpose.

The true aim behind all of the utterly illogical reports in a Dar-

winist publication, such as “Are we related to kangaroos?”, “We

started to walk upright out of hunger”, or “Hiccupping is a legacy

from the frog”, is to distract people’s attention. By positing evolution

as though it were a proven fact, they strive to give the impression that

the only remaining question is where

56


http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/

2008/11/200811187292180817.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2730251.stm

57


hiccupping came from. People who fall under the intense influence of

such reports, and who are inadequately informed on the subject can

easily fall victim to such conditioning. Under the influence of these

misleading reports, they imagine that just a few minor aspects of evo-

lution still need to be explained and that they, too, will eventually be

clarified. Darwinists thus perpetrate the mass deception they have en-

gaged in for decades by way of this system. Darwinist indoctrination

is successfully propagated by this false method.

Let us now remind ourselves that:

✧ Darwinists are unable to explain how even a single protein

might have formed by chance.

✧ They possess not one transitional fossil they can produce.

✧ More than 350 million fossils have demolished evolution.

✧ The complexity in living things has dealt Darwinism one of the

heaviest blows, and revealed biological systems that cannot be ex-

plained in terms of evolution.

✧ All the fossils they have heralded have turned out to be false, or

even deliberate fakes.

✧ Fossils show that living things appeared suddenly and remained

unchanged for millions of years.

These things are scientific evidence. Since Darwinists are unable

to explain them, they produce extraordinarily ridiculous headlines in-

stead because they are in a state of desperation. How else, apart from

using fraud, could they defend a theory launched in the name of sci-

ence, but in fact devoid of any scientific evidence? But they have now

realized that these illogical headlines no longer have any impact. Even

schoolchildren now expect Darwinists to be able to account for the for-

mation of a single protein when they encounter such claims. So this

particular deception has not been long-lived.

58

Nature, 20 Sep 2001


New Scientist, 11-12 July 2008

http://io9.com/#!5403595/one-gene-tweak-could-make-chimps-talk


59

One of the best-known Darwinist propaganda tactics is to inundate the peoplethey have indoctrinated with detail and to distract them from the real issue – thefact that evolution is a fraud – by means of false claims. Darwinists manufacturefictitious and ludicrous reports, giving the impression that everything about evo-lution has been proved and all that remains is detail such as hiccupping being in-herited from such or such an animal or whether a whale turned into an elephant.It is easy to mislead uninformed people with such reports. The person in ques-tion will not then think of investigating whether there is any evidence that actuallycorroborates evolution. Because people swamped in detail are distracted from re-searching the true facts and remain under the Darwinist spell.

New

Scien

tist, 19 Ap

ril 2008

Scientific American, August 2002New Scientist, 03 November 2007

They try to use similarities as evidence

Since Darwinists know that the origin of life has obliterated theirtheory, that fossils have demolished evolution, and that mutationshave no power in and of themselves to bring about evolution, theyhide behind another deception instead, one that will have tremendousinfluence over people and also appear very logical to them; similari-ties between life forms!

Similarities between living things are constantly being raised byDarwinists as if they were evidence of evolution because some people arepredisposed to believe in this deception. The Darwinists speak of thesimilarity between man and apes with such an air of its being absoluteproof that when people exposed to such conditioning go to a zoo, orwatch a documentary about apes, they draw the appropriate conclu-sions. They have been so affected by this Darwinist deception they beganto foolishly imagine that apes could easily turn into human beings “... ifthey developed a bit, shaved and ate better.” A few generalized similar-ities prepare the way for the spread of Darwinist conditioning.

The fact is, however, that no matter how much an ape resemblesa man it will never, by Allah’s leave, for all its time on this Earth, beanything more than an ape. No matter how much or how well it istrained, it will never become human. No matter what it does it willnever, unless Allah chooses otherwise, possess a “soul” that makes ahuman being human.

It is the “soul” that makes human beings human. A living thing isonly human so long as he possesses a soul. Man is an entity capable ofsaying, “I am me,” with the sufficient awareness to realize that there isan image that forms in his brain and that he watches. No matter whathuman beings may look like physically, they are human so long as theypossess a soul. This is the great truth that separates them from all otherliving things and the Darwinists try to cover that fact up. But the theoryof evolution is dealt one of the heaviest blows of all by the definite ex-

60


61


istence of the soul. For that reason, Darwinists are careful to try to avoidthis matter being raised at all. Similarities between life forms constituteno evidence for evolution whatsoever. Of course life forms will resem-ble one another. They all breathe the same air on the same planet. Theyare all made up of compounds of the same elements, eat the same foodsand share the same habitats. All living things have been equipped withsimilarly glorious molecular systems. Every system has been broughtinto being in such a way as to establish a perfect harmony within theconditions on this world, with their strictly defined boundaries. There-fore, these similarities are evidence not of evolution, but of the creativeartistry of Almighty Allah, Who says in one verse:

It is Allah Who created the seven heavens and of the earth thesame number, the Command descending down through all ofthem, so that you might know that Allah has power over all thingsand that Allah encompasses all things in His knowledge. (Suratat-Talaq, 12)

It is the “soul” that makes a living thing human, not its external ap-pearance. Darwinists seek to cover that fact up. Yet the fact that

human beings possess a soul is one of thegreatest dilemmas facing Darwinists anddoes away with all their claims about the

supposed evolution of man.

62

19 September 2006

New Scientist, 8 March 2008

Science, 28 May 2004

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0831_050831_chimp_genes.html

Science, 24 Feb 2004

63

The fact that a chimpanzee can make tools, laugh like a human when tickled orshow affection toward its young is no evidence that it is “in the process of be-coming human.” Physical similarities can never be proof of evolution. Even a dif-ference of 0.001% between two life forms is a gigantic molecular gulf thatDarwinists can never bridge. But even if a chimpanzee was identical to a humanbeing in physical appearance, it could still never be human because it has no soul.Therefore, Darwinist propaganda, examples of which can be seen in these cap-tions, are a gigantic fraud.

www.guardian.co.uk

28 October 2010

Washington Post, 13 October 2007

Nature, 28 October 2004

They apply a comprehensive policy of intimidation

against those who deny evolution

Darwinism is propped up by what can only be described as des-

potism, imposition, coercion, and fraud. The only reason why Dar-

winism has occupied the agenda for so many years is the Darwinist

dictatorship, a system that rules the world. Darwinism has been im-

posed by this dictatorial regime and been accepted by the power of

compulsion. Darwinist indoctrination has spread in ways that people

are unaware of, and vast masses of people have fallen under its sway.

As a result of the sly tactics employed by this vile dictatorship, Dar-

winism has quite literally become undeniable across the world.

Darwinism currently enjoys a vast level of protection from the

various states of the world. It is supported by official institutions in a

great many countries and even forcibly imposed. Those who oppose

the spurious religion that is Darwinism are silenced by the most

despotic methods. There are hundreds of examples of this. This policy

of intimidation, in which professors and scientists have been removed

from their posts for criticizing the theory of evolution, has been fully

exposed in recent years. Students are unable to progress from one year

to another, and people in institutions of state have had their careers ru-

ined. Universities have become part of a dictatorial regime in which

only a Darwinist education is given and acceptable.

64

No academic staff member inany university in the worldquestions Darwinism.

65


People are prevented from rejecting Darwinism, because other-

wise the adherents of the religion of Darwinism would have no other

way of propping this groundless theory up. A lie is spoken very

loudly, and to expose it as a lie is regarded as a crime. A theory her-

alded as scientific, yet having nothing whatsoever to do with science,

has become a superstitious and dogmatic belief officially and openly

protected against rejection. But the most striking thing is that this is

done so flagrantly, with no attempt at concealment at all.

That is why nonsense such as, “Darwinism is supported all over

the world” is completely meaningless and no attention should be paid

to it. The systematic and cunning activities of the Darwinist dictator-

ship make such support obligatory. Some people have to appear to

agree with this false theory in order not to lose their jobs or careers,

while students are compelled to give answers supporting evolution

in order to pass their exams. The greatest intellectual tyranny in his-

tory is enforced worldwide by the Darwinist dictatorship.

Just a few of the professors and scien-tists who have lost their jobs for ques-tioning the theory of evolution.

66

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=405909

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/09/15/anglican-church-owes-darwin-an-apology-senior-clergyman-says/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-

1055597/Church-makes--8216-ludicrous-8217-

apology-Charles-Darwin--126-years-death.html

67

The Darwinist dictatorship has taken over the whole world. Since it is imposed bythat dictatorship, evolution is protected under national laws in all countries ofthe world. It is almost impossible to oppose the theory of evolution or questionits validity. Those who do question it are immediately identified and silenced.Mass pressure is brought to be through the press under the control of the Dar-winist dictatorship, public opinion is set in motion and a huge deterrent campaignis set in motion against the person or body questioning evolution. Fear is thesole reason why professors continue teaching in universities, a conference washeld in the Vatican, the home of the Pope, and people have issued apologies toDarwin. The theory of evolution, the worst fraud of the last 150 years, spreadacross the whole world and its hypnotic effect was cast over vast masses of peo-ple through these techniques employed by the Darwinist dictatorship.

Irish Times, 21 July 2007

Time, 30 April 2001


They condition people with the lie that vast masses

of people believe in evolution

When one grasps the scale of the dictatorial Darwinist regime one

can better understand why it is that evolution appears to be supported

all over the world. Some people generally believe in the legitimacy of

whatever the majority happens to believe in. They want to believe that

the majority is right. The fact is, however, as revealed in the Qur’an in

the words, "If you obeyed most of those on earth, they would mis-

guide you from Allah’s Way..." (Surat al-An'am, 116), that the major-

ity are generally subject to a mass conditioning that turns them away

from Allah’s path. The important thing is to heed the Qur’an and one’s

conscience, rather than the majority. It was the mindset of the major-

ity that led to the mass slaughters of the First and Second World Wars,

this sociodynamic critical mass that led to the atrocities perpetrated

by Hitler’s Germany and Mussolini’s Italy, and that shed so much

blood in communist Russia. This twisted perspective, deeply rooted in

Darwinist ideology, was responsible for

these world wars and the resulting deaths

68


The scourges inflicted on mankind bycruel philosophical movements of Dar-winist origins have led to the deaths oftens of millions of innocent people.

69

of more than 200 million people. This majority culture, this group-

think, is one of the most deceptive and dangerous elements in the ar-

senal of the Darwinist dictatorship.

But how have the majority been brought to believe in Darwinism

despite all its illogicality? The reasons are these:

a) Darwinism is a superstitious belief system methodically or-ganized by atheist masons of the time. All its development fromthe outset to the present day has taken place within this highly or-ganized plan.

b) Atheist masons have quietly, but profoundly, disseminated theidea of evolution, despite its initially attracting much criticism, bymeans of certain press organizations which it monopolizes and thuscreated a pervasive indoctrinating effect similar to mass hypnosis.

c) The impression that evolution is true has been given by meansof newspapers, magazines, television stations and other mediaorgans under the control of atheist masons. That conditioning isstill continuing.

d) In order to thoroughly indoctrinate people, they have devel-oped visual conditioning techniques involving false illustrations,reconstructions, and false pictures and drawings.

e) Despite being the worst fraud in history, they have placed evo-lution in school curricula as if it were scientific fact.

f) The Darwinist dictatorship, under the control of atheist ma-sons, has placed evolution under global protection and variousadministrations have personally undertaken that task. Opposi-tion to evolution has literally become regarded as equivalent tohigh treason, and individuals, schools and managements have allbeen taken to court for that reason.

g) Opponents of evolution have been intimidated, silenced andremoved from their posts. It has become all but impossible to ob-ject to evolution.

70


71


h) Although science completely refutes evolution, they have de-clared that believers in evolution are scientific while its opponentsare unscientific, and as a result of this conditioning people whoreject evolution have been alienated from society. As we have seen, Darwinism enjoys support, not because it is sci-

entific, but because it is inculcated by means of imposition and coer-cion, and protected across the world by the Darwinist dictatorship.The fact that the majority support this false theory must not andshould not deceive people; some of the people are unaware that Dar-winism is the greatest fraud that has ever been, while others appear tosupport Darwinism only out of fear of losing their jobs or attractingcriticism from people around them.

There are of course some people – albeit a small minority – whodo honestly adopt Darwinism as an ideology, a false religion. As Allahreveals in the Qur’an, these people have been created to deny Allahand side with superstition. In the Qur’an, Allah tells us that these peo-ple will never believe, even if they were to witness genuine miracles.The existence of such people must not, therefore, deceive anyone.Almighty Allah describes these people as follows in the Qur’an:

Even if We sent down angels to them, and the dead spoke to them,and We gathered together everything in front of them right beforetheir eyes, they would still not believe unless Allah willed. Thetruth is that most of them are ignorant. (Surat al-An’am, 111)

These people, explicitly described in the Qur’an, are in fact wellaware of their wrongdoing. They realize that Darwinism is false andwrong, and that it is Almighty Allah who created them and all things.But even though they accept what the Qur’an says in their hearts, theystill object and deny it all because of their pride. In another verse,Almighty Allah says:

And they repudiated them wrongly and haughtily, in spite of theirown certainty about them. See the final fate of the corrupters.(Surat an-Naml, 14)

They try not to lose supporters by threatening

them with exclusion from society

Darwinism has been comprehensively defended by the Darwin-ist dictatorship for the last 150 years, and is protected by law in a num-ber of countries. Those who subscribe to the theory are praised, whilethose who reject it are ridiculed or sacked. The theory is also taught ona compulsory basis in schools. For these reasons, it is not at all a sim-ple matter to openly state that one rejects Darwinism in such a climate.Such people are immediately excluded and removed by others, underthe powerful impact of Darwinist conditioning. This is one of the mostimportant psychological deterrent methods employed by the Dar-winist dictatorship in order to hold onto its adherents.

It would be a very significant event for someone who has spent alifetime specializing in evolution, and maybe even become a professor,to one day announce that he rejects Darwinism and has seen the in-validity of evolution. If a professor announces that he now rejects evo-lution, he is well aware that his whole career has essentially come toan end, that he will be removed from his post in the university, that thegreat majority of his friends, largely made up of Darwinists, willswiftly turn their backs on him, and that he will also be subjected to in-tense negative propaganda. That is how it has always been. Profes-sors we have already cited have lost their jobs, friends, and colleaguesfor that very reason. Unpleasant defamation campaigns have been setin motion on the internet about some of them in order to prevent themfinding work again, while others have been declared to be “intellectualterrorists” by employers.

Rejecting the theory of evolution brings with it major life changesfor someone who has spent years as an evolutionist and may evenhave built a career on it. For such a person, all the ideological scourgesthat Darwinism brings with it are invalidated in a moment. Commu-nism, fascism, atheism, and many other such perverse beliefs all be-

72


73


come instantly worthless. For example, from the moment a satanistsees the invalidity of Darwinism, being a satanist will be meaningless,as satanism is a false religion based entirely on elitism and social Dar-winism. The moment a terrorist capable of ruthlessly murdering otherpeople realizes the invalidity of Darwinism, he will also realize howillogical and incompatible with good conscience his actions were. Theperverse ideological foundation that justified killing suddenly van-ishes in a puff of smoke. For that reason, rejecting Darwinism changesthe whole perspective, values, and lives of people who based theirlives on that perverse ideology.

This policy of exclusion against those who reject Darwinism isperhaps the most effective psychological weapon to which Darwin-ists resort. Some people who believe it will be to difficult for them toovercome that policy of exclusion have had to appear to be evolu-tionists, despite not truly believing in it. There are a great many peo-ple who have had to appear to eagerly espouse evolution whenevolutionists are present, when holding conferences or writing booksand articles about it, despite clearly seeing its illogicality. There hasbeen a particular rise in recent years in the number of people whoclearly see the existence of Allah, but who are unable to express thatthought in the presence of their atheist friends.

This policy of intimidation must not alarm the people in questionbecause the supposed dominion of the Darwinist dictatorship is tem-porary and weak. As Allah has promised, superstition will certainlydisappear and the truth will be victorious. What needs to be known isthat Allah is always alongside those who genuinely turn to Him, whoheed their consciences and who are prepared to risk social exclusionby espousing what is right and true. It is the friends of Allah who willinevitably be victorious. Our Almighty Lord reveals in a verse that:

If Allah helps you, no one can vanquish you. If He forsakesyou, who can help you after that? So the believers should puttheir trust in Allah. (Surah Al ‘Imran, 160)

74

http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090310/full/news.2009.150.html

http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/67115/

striking-protest-by-metu-to-the-tubitak-

regarding-the-darwin-censor-.html

http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/domestic/11189047.asp?scr=1

Minister who questioned evolution removed from post

HaberTurk, 26.02.2011

Protests to TRT, Enemy ofDarwin

Birgün, 4 December 2009

75

If a professor one day announces that he does not believe in evolution, he knowsthat his whole career will come to an end, that he will be spurned by family andfriends, that he will be defamed and subjected to an intensive smear campaign, thathe will never again find work because of the negative reports spread about him andthat he will be crushed in psychological terms. Because of that intense psycholog-ical pressure, a great many professors are forced to give the impression of believ-ing in evolution, even though they do not. This policy of exclusion aimed at peoplewho reject Darwinism is perhaps the most effective psychological technique towhich Darwinists resort. Evolution is a huge fraud that people are forced to espousethrough threats, exclusion, negative propaganda and hooligan methods.

http://ww.bianet.org/bianet/freedom-of-expres-

sion/113054-darwin-censored-at-scientific-

councils-magazine

http://www.turks.us/article.php?story=20090504070626603

http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_get-

NewsById.action?load=detay&link=169462

GLOBAL CENSUREPosta, 12. 03. 2009

They try to give the impression that large numbers

of people support evolution by arranging

false polls and statistics

When asked for scientific evidence, Darwinists generally reply asfollows: "But evolution is regarded as fact all over the world!" Whenthey say that, Darwinists imagine that all the questions hanging overevolution somehow disappear, that people will be satisfied with thatreply, and that by saying this it will be enough to ensure acceptanceof Darwinism. Indeed, this method of psychological conditioning hashad a huge effect on some people who attach little importance to thefact that the theory of evolution is not backed up by any scientific ev-idence and who regard general opinion as more significant.

That is why the Darwinist dictatorship tries every possible meansto give the impression that evolution is accepted all over the world.One method is to organize false surveys and statistics, and then usethese polls to show that large numbers of people believe in evolution,and then publish their survey results to loud fanfare in the press or-gans under the control of the Darwinist dictatorship.

Someone looking at the results of the polls in question may wellthink that only a very few people reject evolution, particularly in coun-tries such as the United States and Great Britain. Under the influenceof the mass psychology we have already discussed, they may imaginethat this false majority believing in evolution is on the true path. Butthis is a deception. In fact, no such poll has ever been held. These re-sults are fraudulent figures invented for the purpose of being an-nounced in press organs under the control of the Darwinistdictatorship. As always, Darwinists deceive people, this time by thesefake polls and figures.

Polls have been conducted in many countries and people havebeen genuinely asked what they think; but the results obtained are theexact opposite of what the Darwinists claim. People actually reject evo-

76


77


A report inthe BritishGuardiannewspaperthat only 25% of Britons were shown tobelieve in evolution following a poll in GreatBritain was quickly changed on the paper’sweb site to read that half the country’s popula-tion did not believe in evolution.

One of the largest polls conductedshowed that Turkey heads the listof countries rejecting evolution.Turkey is followed by the USA.

lution and believe that Allah creates all things. And these levels aregrowing all the time. One of the largest verifiable polls conductedshowed that Turkey heads the list of those rejecting evolution.3 Thesecond country in terms of rejection of evolution was the United Statesof America.

Therefore, it must not be forgotten that if high levels of belief inevolution are suggested in a poll, or any statistical research in Dar-winist publications, then the results are fraudulent. In fact, polls con-ducted all over the world, especially in the United States, Canada, andEuropean countries such as Great Britain, show that evolution hasbeen abandoned to a very significant extent.

78


They claim to not to be “bothered”

by anti-Darwinist activities

One of the most terrifying things for a publishing group spread-

ing Darwinist propaganda with all of its might is without doubt the

success of anti-Darwinist activities. Books, articles, exhibitions and

conferences setting out the proofs of the fact of creation are enjoying

a worldwide success which represents a grave threat for these Dar-

winists. The publishing groups in question makes no mention of this

success, the work of large numbers of people. They generally prefer to

appear to attach no importance to that success and say, “It does not

bother us at all.”

But in truth, the Darwinists are in a state of panic. Conferences

around the world describe how Darwinists are unable to account for

even a single protein and exhibit fossils that totally refute evolution,

while molecular biology utterly eliminates the possibility of evolution.

Thousands of people listen to this information with great amazement.

This information is also passed on by word of mouth to hundreds of

thousands more. People who see this evidence can no longer believe in

Darwinism. Therefore, saying “........we are not bothered” is a defense

mechanism intended to neutralize this huge defeat and cover it up.

This is actually a very childish reaction, much like the way that a

small child, having been punished by his father, will try to give the

impression he is unaffected by saying, “I don’t care,” Darwinist pub-

lications exhibit the very same reaction. But their trickery is being ex-

posed and the theory of evolution they espouse with such fervid

desperation is collapsing before everyone’s eyes. It is therefore im-

possible for Darwinists to be unaffected by that collapse; of course

they will be affected, and terrified by it.

Darwinists’ terror will grow still further, because all the scientific

evidence is increasingly showing the fact of Creation. The corrupt

79

hegemony of the Darwinist dictatorship is coming to an end. This age

will be one that manifests our Almighty Lord’s title of the Hadi (the

Bestower of guiadance), an age of faith. Every superstitious faith

launched in opposition to belief in Allah will inevitably vanish.

Almighty Allah says in one verse:

Say: ‘Truth has come and falsehood has vanished. Falsehood isalways bound to vanish.’ (Surat al-’Isra, 81)

More than 200 conferences on thecollapse of the theory of evolutionheld around the world and at-tended by large numbers of peoplehave greatly upset Darwinists.This great success has terrifiedthem. The use of the term “... itdoes not bother us” is intended toneutralize and help them cope withthat enormous defeat.

The collapse of the theory of evolution and the fact of Creation conference series

Switzerland

France – Paris

Germany

80

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/28/us-china-dinosaur-bird-idUSTRE60R62F20100128

Sydney Morning, 9 April 2010

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.html


81

Whenever there are effective activities regarding the collapse of Darwinism, when-ever conferences are held, books distributed or TV programs made, Darwinists al-ways attempt to neutralize that effect by saying “we are not bothered.” Then theytry to make good the damage by inventing another “missing link” report. Theytry to give the impression that this global defeat has not affected them. But thefact is they are in a state of panic. They have realized their trickery of the last 150years will be exposed. They are aware they are headed toward total collapse. The“missing link” reports they produce so keenly are in fact their ideology’s deaththroes. But they can now see that even these will do them no good.

New evidence of the dinosaur-bird connection NTVMSNBC, 11 May 2010

A new link in evolutionSabah, 10. 04. 2010

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/04/07/welcome-to-the-family-missing-link.html#

The Detroit News, 9 April 2010

Great news, we have an ancestor

Star, 26 March 2010

82


They try to cast a spell over people with

false illustrations and reconstructions

By now, we are all familiar with an ape-man that for many years

has appeared in the pages of newspapers and magazines, that was for

years taught in school books as if it were true, and that people were

told represented important evidence for is an entirely false chronol-

ogy. This fake ape-man was depicted walking with a stooped gait and

an animal-like appearance holding a heavy club in his hands and with

a whole social life. It was also been given an almost unpronounceable

Latin name: Hesperopithecus haroldcookii.

Hesperopithecus haroldcookii was illustrated time and time again in

the pages of the world’s best known magazines. Reconstructions of it

were produced and exhibited in prestigious museums.. Nobel prize-

winning scientists discussed it at conferences, doctoral theses were

written about it, and scientists frequently debated as to what kind of

social life it enjoyed, where and how it lived, where it walked and how

it spoke. It was also better known by another name: Nebraska Man.

One very important point here is that all of these fictitious sce-

nario concerning Hesperopithecus haroldcookii, which Darwinist scien-

tists studied and taught their students for years, was revealed to have

been all invented on the basis of a single pig tooth.

Nebraska Man is an example which illustrates the scale of the

frauds Darwinists perpetrate through visual conditioning, but it is by

no means the only one. All the Darwinist pictures of fictitious ape-

men, with all their characteristics such as enjoying social lives, hunt-

ing and fishing, playing with their children and whatnot, are

sometimes based on nothing more than a single finger bone, a shoul-

der blade or a tooth. Parts of fossil skeletons are sometimes unearthed,

but then such fantastical reconstructions are produced that the result

is a fully fledged ape-man. But this is a complete deception.

83

Reconstructions and evolutionist drawings are used

to mislead people and create the impression that there really is such a

thing as evolution. As we have seen with Nebraska Man, the various

pictures and reconstructions are based solely on the imaginations of

the people producing them. No such ape-man ever, ever existed. In-

deed, all the skulls and skeletons discovered either come from human

beings, or else from extinct species of apes or monkeys. But the pic-

tures and reconstructions produced provides the framework for the

subsequent conditioning.

All the ape-men, dino-birds, and life forms trying to move from

water to dry land that one sees in Darwinist newspapers, magazines

and TV programs are fictitious. If nothing else, they certainly reflect

the imaginative power of the artists concerned. When they are exposed

as frauds, they are quietly set aside. The Darwinist press is very care-

ful that nobody should realize the scale of the fraud being perpetrated.

But policies of concealing frauds of course bears no fruits, and all Dar-

winist deceptions are being exposed, one by one, and all the time.

Nebraska Man is the greatest evidenceof Darwinists’ reconstruction decep-tions. Darwinists had no hesitationsover depicting the fictitious NebraskaMan and a whole social setting “on thebasis of a single pig tooth.”

Time, 9 August 2004

IMAGIN

ARY

IMAGIN

ARY

Tim

e14.03.1994

Toronto Star,11 August 2007

Ottowa Citizen, 9 August 2007

NTV Bilim, 10.2009

Kansas City, 9 August 2007

84

She recreated them!Akşam, 6 April 2001


Science vie, Nov 2003

28 October 2010

Mankind survived by cannibalismMilliyet, 23 June 2010

http://www.associatedcontent.com/arti-cle/21288/biocultural_evolution_still_af-

fecting.html?cat=5

85

All the illustrations in these newspaper clippings are FALSE. No such ape-manever existed. Darwinists use drawings and reconstructions to spread lies. Theyuse the conditioning technique that will most affect people – the visual element.Someone uninformed on the subject who looks at these newspapers will beginto become very familiar with these ape-men he keeps seeing. Through thismagic spell he will become “convinced” that our ancestors really were ape-men.That person will easily believe in evolution. He will feel no need to ask for anyscientific evidence. That is how Darwinist propaganda beguiles people, spread-ing hypnosis in this way.

A 4-million-year changeYeni Şafak, 01. 10. 1998

86

Darwinists produced the above illustrations from a little finger fossil theyfound in Siberia an claimed that the finger represented a “third species ofman.” The sole reason why Darwinists resorted to that deception is that thisfinger belonging to modern man did not fit into their fictitious schemes of evo-lution and indeed totally refuted the theory of evolution. It was immediatelydepicted as an odd kind of ape-man in Darwinist publications, taking ab-solutely no precautionary measures at all, and the impression was given thatthe discovery had something to do with evolution. Were it not for the com-prehensive and scientific responses provided by us on the subject, this de-ception would have taken in vast numbers of people. Someone unaware of thescientific facts about the subject might well imagine that this ape-man he sawin Darwinist publications was true.

Commercial Appeal, 9 August 2007

Asian Age,09 August 2007

Boston Herald USA, 09.08.2007

Baltimore Sun, 9 August 2007

Daily Mail, 9 August 2007

Calgary Herald, 9 August 2007

The Gazette Colarado, 9 August 2007

Dai

ly T

eleg

rap

h, 0

9.08

.200

7

87


When evidence refuting evolution is discovered,

they either ignore or else try to destroy it

Darwinists have used all these forms of mental conditioning for

the last 150 years and engaged in false fossil propaganda exactly as

they chose. Since they had a monopoly of schools, universities,

renowned scientists, magazines, newspapers and visual media they

could deceive people as they wished. That included evidence refuting

evolution.

Since fossils from the Cambrian Period serve as one of the main

proofs that life began suddenly and with an extraordinary complexity,

and would certainly spell the end of Darwinism, they were hidden

away for seventy years by Charles Doolittle Walcott, the Darwinist

paleontologist who found them. This is a startling and significant in-

dicator in terms of understanding the scale of the Darwinist fraud.

Similar events have taken place quite frequently in subsequent

times, and nobody was even aware of the more than 350 million fos-

sils completely refuting evolution, and discovered to date. Of course,

Darwinists did to these fossils what they did to the Cambrian ones.

Because all of these fossils meant the same thing; each one was proof

of Creation.

For years, Darwinists only ever mentioned two or three types of

“living fossil,” in a bid to give the impression that living fossils con-

sisted of these alone. But then people came to realize that there are

fossil specimens dating back millions of years of all the life forms alive

today. In other words, the great majority of fossils were living fossils

showing that present-day life forms are identical to those living mil-

lions of years ago.

Since the fictitious subject of the evolution of man was the most

sensitive, and the most open to Darwinist speculation, Darwinists en-

gage in widespread fraud when it comes to fossils showing the his-

tory of man. Fossils showing that man has never evolved are generally

kept hidden away, or even destroyed entirely. Because if even one of

these enters the agenda, that will be enough to spell the end of the evo-

lution deceit. That is why false fossils are always brought up in this

context and made the subject of constant speculation.

88


As soon as Charles D. Walcott discovered the Cambrian Era fossils he hid themaway, and kept them HIDDEN FOR THE NEXT 70 YEARS. The only reason forhiding them away is that Cambrian fossils represented the most excellent evi-dence for Creation.

This method of Walcott's is still being applied by today’s evolutionists. Morethan 350 million fossils had been hidden away until they were revealed throughthe Atlas of Creation. Because all these fossils prove Creation. Darwinists try topreserve their false theories not by producing scientific evidence, but by CON-CEALING IT.

89


The trilobite eye in thepicture consists of hun-dreds of tiny cells, eachone of which contains apair of lenses. The 530-

million-year-old com-pound eye system in

these life forms has comedown to the present dayunchanged; various in-sects such as bees and

dragonflies have thesame eye structure.

In order to maintain their ideology they have even

proposed the idea of space creatures

It is utterly humiliating and ludicrous for a Darwinist scientist to

stand up and say, “Space creatures brought life here!” Someone who

pays close attention and is aware of the true face of the Darwinist de-

ception will immediately see that such statements are an expression of

utter wretchedness and despair. Because the single greatest problem

for Darwinists is that of the origin of life. Quite unable to account for

how even a single protein could have formed by chance, and aware of

how helpless they are on that subject, Darwinists have sought a way

out by hiding behind the idea of creatures from space.

There is one very important point we have already stressed re-

garding Darwinists: some Darwinists will deny the existence of Allah

“... even if they see miracles,” as we are told in one verse. This is a

characteristic of some unbelievers described in the Qur’an. Even

though these people are well aware of the facts and the truth, the

Qur’an tells us they will still deny it because of the vast scale of their

pride.

The space creature deception raised by certain atheist Darwinists

was born from exactly that state of affairs. The fact that proteins can-

not come into being spontaneously is just one of the proofs that life

was created. But since it is some Darwinists’ intention to deny the ex-

istence of Allah (surely Allah is beyond that), they ignore this highly

significant fact about proteins. And instead of admitting the existence

of Allah, Who is mighty enough to create even a single protein with

the most amazing complexity, they have become the defenders of this

utterly illogical claim. This is extraordinarily brazen-faced, and in fact

an admission of great weakness. The Darwinists who make this un-

believable claim are utterly humiliating themselves for the sake of

their perverse religion.

90


91


In doing this, Darwinists never reflect on how they will be un-

able to answer the following question: How did this fictitious and com-

plex molecule they make this claim about come into being? Even if it were

somewhere in the vastness of space, it could not have come into being

by chance; thus, there has to be an intelligence far superior to that of

human beings that created it. That alone spells the end of this dubious

Darwinist claim. Other claims made by Darwinists, such as organic

molecules arriving from space and being caught in something like a

cold trap used in the Miller experiment and eventually giving rise to

a living cell, are equally preposterous.

Even if all the organic molecules constituting a cell, even if all the

proteins in it that could never come into being by chance were all pres-

ent at the same time, and even if all the conditions claimed by the Dar-

winists applied, it would still be impossible for a cell to emerge by

chance. Darwinists are unable to produce even the smallest compo-

nents of the cell, not even in a conscious and controlled manner and

under whatever laboratory conditions they desire. They are unable to

account for even a single protein. Darwinists are just playing games

with people. Their deceptive idea of “space creatures” makes their

perspective towards human beings very clear indeed. They imagine

that they can still impose evolution, the great deception of the last 150

years and which they now fear they may be losing, by means of such

nonsense, and that people will simply accept it.

Darwinists can strive all they like, but all the claims they come

up with for the purpose of encouraging denial of Allah (surely Allah

is beyond that) merely humiliate them further. Because Almighty

Allah, Lord of the worlds, has promised in verse that He will bring

down all those who deny Him:

... know that you cannot thwart Allah and that Allah will hu-miliate the unbelievers. (Surat at-Tawba, 2)

92

www.space.com/1686-life-building-blocks-abundant-space.html

So, did we all come from Mars?

Vatan, 14 November 2005

Asteroids gave rise to lifeBugün, 8 December 2008

Hope in extraterrestrial life Bugün, 11 December 2008

So, we came from Mars!Sabah, 3 February 2003

http://www.100megsfree4.com/

farshores/n02et.htm

Proof of extraterrestrial life

Radikal, 11. 12. 2008

93

Some Darwinists, who are unable to deny that proteins cannot come into beingby chance but that are unwilling to abandon the fraudulent state of mind broughtabout by materialist logic, instead of admitting the sublime power of AlmightyAllah, have no compunctions about hiding behind the idea of space creatures.They again engage in fraud and to try deceive people into thinking that the ideaof space will answer the fundamental question of how protein first came intoexistence. In fact, however, the Darwinist idea of outer space is an indicator ofa very profound and comprehensive despair. It is an admission of defeat andbafflement. It is one of the claims that most humiliates Darwinists. Life neithercame from outer space nor started on Earth by chance. Life came into being,with all its extraordinary beauty diversity and complexity by our Lord telling itto “Be!” This is the only conclusion shown us by science through molecular bi-ology, genetics and 350 million fossils.

We fell to Earth from spaceSabah, 6 April 2005

Meteors gave lifeRadikal, 10 August 2005

http://www.physorg.com/news5686.html

Did life come from space?

Vatan, 5 December 2006

So, are we all Martians? Vatan, 14. 11. 2005

They try to silence activities demonstrating the

invalidity of evolution, not with scientific evidence,

but by shouting the opposition down

Darwinists are afraid of science. They are terrified at the facts re-

vealed by science becoming known to all and spreading across the world

because everything truly scientific demolishes and refutes evolution.

For that reason, Darwinists can never RESPOND TO ANYONE

WITH SCIENCE.

- Aggression is their only response to scientific evidence.

- They oppose conferences against evolution that reveal scientificevidence, not with evidence of their own, but with placards andprotests.

- They try to close down exhibitions displaying scientific facts – gen-uine fossils. They seek to burn books containing scientific evidence.

- They take people who try to have scientific evidence that ex-poses the fraud of evolution being taught in schools to court.

- They reject invitations from adherents of creationism to face-to-face debates with horror and terror and never, ever accept suchchallenges.

- Instead of responding to scientific evidence with evidence oftheir own, Darwinists reply with despotism, aggression, bruteforce and great hue and cry because they possess no scientific ev-idence and this is the only way they know of keeping their theorypropped up.

Darwinists hide behind concepts such as democracy, rights, lib-

erty and freedom of thought at every available opportunity, but when

the invalidity of their claims is exposed, they suddenly become big-

oted and aggressive. They immediately disregard the concepts of free-

dom of thought and speech, democracy, and intellectual freedom they

have been sheltering behind. They immediately become utterly intol-

94


95


erant, and even highly aggressive,

when evidence revealing the fact

of creation is brought forward. In-

deed, when it comes to ideas, it is

the Darwinists themselves who are the most closed minded, bigoted,

and perverse of all. Far from being a scientific conclusion, Darwinism

is a false and perverse belief that science actually refutes. Since it is

based solely on ideology and a superstitious belief system, its sup-

porters can only seek to keep it alive through methods more suited to

hooligans than men of science and education.

For many years now, Darwinism has intimidated people with this

despotic policy. If it is that Darwinism dominates institutions of state

across the whole world today, the sole reason for that is the tyranni-

cal and aggressive policy of intimidation in question. If a Darwinist

comes to a scientific conference holding a placard instead of scientific

evidence, if he tries to silence opposition by shouting rather than mak-

ing scientific statements, if he imagines he can intimidate opponents

of evolution by attacking them, and if he is removed from a scientific

conference under police escort, then that alone is enough to expose

the true face of Darwinism. Reports of the collapse of Darwinism have

initiated an extraordinary panic among Darwinists. No despotism will

now be able to keep the Darwinists’ false religion propped up. This is

the law of Allah. Our Lord Allah, Who knows all things, reveals in

one verse that believers will always emerge victorious:

Rather We hurl the truth against falsehood and it cuts rightthrough it and it vanishes clean away! Woe without end for youfor what you portray! (Surat al-Anbiya’, 18)

The only way that Darwinists can re-spond to scientific anti-evolution activ-ities is by behaving like hooligans withaggression, protests and shouting andscreaming. They can never respondwith science and scientific evidence.

The fact they suffer psychological troubles and

difficulties is clear from their behavior and reactions

There is a very important clue that Darwinists are psychologi-

cally troubled; it manifests itself in their body language. One can

clearly see that they have suffered a terrible defeat from their anxious

states when they see proofs of Creation, from their reactions, uncon-

trolled actions, and stressed responses. This is another significant piece

of evidence that Darwinism is a deception.

Darwinists in any case usually confront supporters of Creation

with the full awareness of this defeat and with a sense of inferiority.

For that reason, instead of enjoying the peace and ease that comes

from espousing what is true and right, they suffer under the burden

and troubles that comes from espousing a lie. Their own ideology re-

quires them to espouse a theory devoid of any scientific evidence as

though it were scientific, and has strong supporting evidence. They

have to try and respond to vital scientific evidence proving the inva-

lidity of the theory of evolution. Even though they know that people

will believe and be convinced by the true scientific facts, they still try

to give the impression that what they espouse is the truth. Having to

96


The beauty, har-mony and symmetry

in nature is one ofthe most troublingissues for Darwin-ists. Even Darwin

did not conceal thatunease, being

forced to admit thatthe feathers of a

peacock made himfeel “ill.”

97


consistently espouse a lie is a terrible burden for a person, particularly

if he is aware of the true facts.

That is why in discussion programs there are scenes where Dar-

winists display very angry, irritable, and distressed behavior, waving

their arms around in peculiar gestures and generally giving an im-

pression of stress and exhaustion. They constantly say there is some-

thing they want to state, but no statement is ever forthcoming. It is

impossible for them to make any statement because there is absolutely

no scientific evidence for evolution. This is the stress and unease that

comes from not espousing the truth. Darwinists inevitably experience

this constantly distressed state of mind everywhere in their lives, not

just in the environments described above, because they espouse a lie

and behave falsely. Almighty Allah reveals in a verse

how those who strive against our Lord will have

troubled lives:

But if anyone turns away from Myreminder, his life will be a dark andnarrow one... (Surah Ta Ha, 124)

They maintain that all claims refuting evolution

are unscientific

We have been discussing how Darwinists try to give the impres-

sion of being scientific by using scientific formulae and terminology

and have thus deceived large numbers of people by means of such

psychological conditioning. A second fraudulent tactic that Darwinists

resort to in this context is the (deceptive) defense mechanism of sug-

gesting that opponents of Darwinism are unscientific.

Because he knows he will inevitably come off for the worse, a

Darwinist will never publicly debate a proponent of creation, and will

justify this attitude by saying that “... the proper environment for a

scientific debate has not been established.” But this is merely defeatism

and an easy way out. Of course they will not want to engage in such

a debate, because they know they will lose and end up humiliated. In-

stead, they hide behind the idea of being scientific in their search for

ways to avoid such encounters.

But the fact is that it is only the supporters of Creation that have

produced scientific evidence. No Darwinist has ever been able to pro-

duce even a single piece of scientific evidence, nor is it possible for

any Darwinist ever to do so. But the scientific evidence refuting evo-

lution that he sees during the course of any debate will cause him

enormous distress. He will see genuine fossils, and the frauds of evo-

lution will be exposed, and the simple fact that evolutionists are un-

able to account for how even a single protein could have come about

by chance will be revealed for all to see. Such a defeat is intolerable for

Darwinists. That is why they hide behind all these very familiar psy-

chological defense mechanisms and accuse the other side of being un-

scientific.

This fact must be always borne in mind: Darwinists possess not

so much as one single piece of scientific evidence. All they have is

98


99


demagoguery, lies, false accusations, aggression, psychological con-

ditioning, hoax fossils and abundant specious scientific terminology.

They way they claim to be “scientific” is one of the century’s most as-

tonishing phenomena. This shows the worldwide scale of the Dar-

winist deception. A deception that is constantly rebutted by scientific

evidence, and that not even children attach any credence to, has

adopted science as a protective shield.

Therefore, one must always bear in mind that a Darwinist who es-

pouses evolution in the name of science and simultaneously refuses to

have any dealings with proponents of Creation because they aren't

scientific is engaging in a huge deception. Science is in actual fact Dar-

winists’ greatest foe. Because the more they turn their backs on sci-

ence, the more the scientific facts keep annihilating evolution.

Mr. Adnan Oktar has time and again reiterated his invitation to the atheist andDarwinist Richard Dawkins for a face-to-face encounter. He even placed a noticein the eminent British daily The Times for that purpose. The only reason whyDawkins avoids such a debate is without doubt the fact that he is only too wellaware that his claim will completely collapse in the face of the scientific evidencehe sees in Mr. Oktar’s works.

From the 13 October, 2009, issue of the Times, Great Britain

100


Science is anti-Darwinist and anti-atheist

SCIENCE IS THE ENEMY OF DARWINISM. SCIENCE IS OPPOSED TOATHEISM. SCIENCE IS ANTI-COMMUNIST AND ANTI-MARXIST. SCI-ENCE ANNIHILATES MARXIST, ATHEIST, AND DARWINIST THINK-ING. The Darwinist deception has collapsed in the face of science. Sciencehas dealt Darwinist propaganda its heaviest blow. Science has eliminatedthe mass conditioning of the fraud of evolution. Science has torn down thefoundations of atheist philosophy. Science demolishes Darwinism whereverit goes, wherever it shows its face. SCIENCE is ANTI-PAGAN. Science doesaway with idolatrous thinking, superstitious religions and false ideologies.For that reason, SCIENCE INFLICTS THE GREATEST PAIN ON DAR-WINISTS.

Passing Darwinism off as science is part of an unpleasant trickery being per-petrated across the world. The system of the dajjal required a new religion(surely Allah is beyond that) in order to eliminate belief in Allah from theworld, and it many years ago identified the most efficient hypnotic tech-nique and surrounded itself with science. It realized it could take advantageof science to mislead people, that it could reach across the world, take con-trol of the most key positions and perpetrate all kinds of fraud, all in thename of science. The mass hypnosis that the system of the dajjal carried outall over the world was spread in the name of science.

But the science they thought of as their ally eventually devastated Darwin-ists. They never dreamed as they shamelessly perpetrated their scientificfrauds that science would inflict such dreadful suffering on them. They en-tered a state of shock when they saw that science served only religion. Theywere terrified to see the world’s greatest scientists announcing to the worldthat they believed in Allah. They again attempted to hide behind their sci-entific nonsense, but to no avail. They lost their voices. They saw with theirown eyes how science demolished atheism, Darwinism, Marxism, commu-nism, materialism and all other superstitious ideologies. Darwinists sufferedtheir worst defeat at the hands of science. The science they thought of astheir ally actually routes them.

101


One of the greatest facts that emerged with advances in science in the 21st

century is this: science is for those who believe in Allah. Science benefitstrue believers. Allah refers in the Qur’an to the gnat (Surat al-Baqara, 26)and the honeybee (Surat an-Nahl, 68). He notes the stars travelling in theirorbits (Surat adh-Dhariyat, 7) and to ships floating on the water (Surat al-Hajj, 65). Allah refers in the Qur’an to leaves turning tree (Surat al-An’am,59) and to the seven layers of the sky (Surat al-Isra’, 44). Allah tells believ-ers in the Qur’an to be aware of these proofs of faith. People discover thedepths of these phenomena as they investigate them with science.

Science tells us the anesthetic technique by which a mosquito inserts itsproboscis and it tells us the molecular structure of the substance in thatlocal anesthetic. The miracle of photosynthesis in green leaves, the laws ofphysics by which ships float on water and the celestial bodies that remainsuspended in the sky and never go off course – unless Allah so chooses –are all facts shown us by science. Science proves everything we are told inthe Qur’an. Therefore, anyone capable of thinking with reason and goodconscience will immediately grasp the Almighty Existence of Allah from asingle instance cited in the Qur’an. For that reason, a gnat cited in theQur’an is enough for us to believe in our Almighty Lord. Allah says inverses:

Allah is not ashamed to make an example of a gnat or of an even smallerthing. As for those who believe, they know it is the truth from their Lord.But as for those who disbelieve, they say, ‘What does Allah mean by thisexample?’ He misguides many by it and guides many by it. But He onlymisguides the deviators. (Surat al-Baqara, 26)

Mankind! an example has been made, so listen to it carefully. Thosewhom you call upon besides Allah are not even able to create a single fly,even if they were to join together to do it. And if a fly steals somethingfrom them, they cannot get it back. How feeble are both the seeker andthe sought! (Surat al-Hajj, 73)

102


Signs leading to faith are gifts shown to us by science. They are a gloriousblessing from Allah. Allah uses science as His instrument to show us Hissublimity, greatness and might. Both science and its discoveries are cre-ated by Allah, Lord of the Worlds. Darwinists are now in a state of panic.They are amazed to see that science is anti-pagan and anti-Darwinist. Thatpain is the worst of all Darwinists’ sufferings over the last 150 years. Theway that those who understand science have abandoned Darwinism indroves has further increased that suffering. The way that science servesIslam has multiplied that pain even more. So much so that Darwinistshave shamefully declared that the way out lies with space creatures. Thatis the final situation of the system of the dajjal that has perpetrated masshypnosis for the last 150 years. Every branch of science shows the sub-lime existence of Allah. The 21st century will be the age of that discoveryand of an irreparable Darwinist defeat.

Science is Darwinism's worst enemy. Sci-ence obliterates Marxist, atheist, material-ist and Darwinist thinking. Science hasrevealed the sublime existence and Cre-ation of Allah in all their glory. All thesefacts revealed by science, and the way thatscience serves Islam, represent Darwin-ists’ worst sufferings in the 21st century.

103

They try to spread the deception that evolution and

belief in Allah are not incompatible

Materialism constitutes the foundation of Darwinism. According

to the materialist error, matter is eternal and there is no force superior

to it. To put it another way, materialism rejects the idea of a Creator

who rules the matter that constitutes the universe, and maintains it

constantly under His control (surely Allah is beyond that). The only

reason for all the efforts made to prop up Darwinism, which is based

on the absolute existence of matter, and for all the frauds and decep-

tions perpetrated to that end, is the desire to prevent acceptance of the

fact that a sublime and omnipotent Creator has brought all things into

being. Darwinists have been endeavoring to do that for the last 150

years. And that is the reason Darwinism has been adopted as a false

religion.

Darwinists as of late have been in a state of terrible panic due to

this important fact having come to light in recent years. The reason

for this panic is the fear of losing the support of large number of reli-

gious believers. Many people who believe in Allah and are ignorant of

the true face of Darwinism blindly sign up to this deception, and Dar-

winists have been greatly displeased by the revelation of a truth that

will awaken them.

The manner in which Darwinists have been working so strenu-

ously to cover up the fact that Darwinism and atheism are in fact

equivalent to one other is particularly striking. Worldwide conferences

being held by Darwinists holding the title of Priest, conferences on

evolution even being held in the Vatican as the result of pressure on

the Pope, prizes being given to Darwinists acting on behalf of charities

that seek to reconcile belief in Allah and evolution, clergymen ap-

pearing on television programs to defend evolution, the citing of

fraudulent statements in support of evolution made by people who

104


105


lived in the past and are heralded as religious scholars, and many

other such initiatives all stem from that same unease. The Darwinist

press under the control of atheist freemasons must have realized that

the equation "Darwinism = Atheism" would pose a huge difficulty

for them and so went into action at once to raise the issue. The atheist

and Darwinist Richard Dawkins admits the existence of a Darwinist

lobby active in this sphere: There’s a kind of … evolution defense lobby, in particular. They are mostly

atheists, but they are wanting to—desperately wanting—to be friendly to

mainstream, sensible religious people. And the way you do that is to tell

them that there’s no incompatibility between [evolution] and religion…4

As is clear from Dawkins' own admission, atheists represent the

great majority of Darwinists who are trying to supposedly reconcile

belief in Allah and evolution. This is a most unpleasant and mislead-

ing trick. All Darwinists who are prepared to engage in conditioning

people through fraud and deception merely for the sake of their ide-

ology have joined this pagan religion in order to deny the existence of

Allah. In spreading their propaganda, Darwinists strive to conceal the

true face of their theory. The fact that some people are unaware of is

that this perverse and unscientific theory constitutes the source be-

hind irreligion, tyranny, wars, slaughter, cruelty, degeneracy, terror

and the martyring of so many soldiers in Turkey. The intensive Dar-

winist propaganda provides the foundation for the blind support of

their insidious pseudo-religion. Darwinists are terrified of losing these

blind grassroots supporters.

Darwinism is opposed to all beliefs and ideas that espouse the ex-

istence of Allah, that praise our Lord and point to Almighty Allah’s

creative artistry. Darwinism is a perverse religion produced in a de-

liberate and programmatic manner in atheist freemasons lodges for

the purpose of halting the turning towards Allah, preventing the

emergence of devout societies, and for materialism to be able to reign

supreme as a false faith. Just as it was intended, this perverse religion

has for 150 years turned vast masses of people away from belief in

Allah and constituted the foundation of the communist and fascist

regimes that inflicted some of the worst scourges in history. Today’s

efforts to reconcile evolution and belief in Allah are one of the most

unpleasant ruses of this whole great fraud. Everyone must reject this

deception and this false propaganda. Our Almighty Lord created all

things, the earth and sky and everything between, simply by com-

manding them to “Be!” That is the glorious Creation shown in the

Qur’an and exhibited with so much evidence on earth. The evidence

of that glorious Creation is inflicting defeat upon defeat on the fraud

of Darwinism, day after day, and is effectively eliminating it. As our

Almighty Lord says in one verse:

It is He Who created the heavens and the earth with truth. Theday He says ‘Be!’ it is. His speech is Truth. The Kingdom will beHis on the Day the Trumpet is blown, the Knower of the Un-seen and the Visible. He is the All-Wise, the All-Aware. (Suratal-An'am, 73)

106


107

If Almighty Allah wished, He could of course havecreated all this glorious life using evolution as His in-strument. And in that event we would, of course,have been the most convinced adherents of evolu-tion. But creation did not take place like that, as theQur’an says, our Lord created living things in a sin-gle moment by telling them to “Be!” This magnificentcreation demolishes Darwinism more and more everyday with new evidence.

108

Today’s Zaman, 01.07.2010

The Daily Telegraph, 26 July 2007

NCSE Resource, 26 July 2007

NCSE Resource, 20 January 2006

New Humanist, 03.2010

109

Darwinism is a perverse pagan religion deliberately and systematically devel-oped in atheist Freemasons Lodges. Over the last 150 years, it has turned peo-ple away from belief in Allah and wreaked terrible oppression on the world 150.Darwinism is opposed to science and to all opinions and beliefs that espousethe existence of Allah and point to our Lord’s sublime creative power. ThoseDarwinists who seek to reconcile evolution and belief in Allah are thereforelying. Those who go along with such Darwinist claims are being. This is a hoaxperpetrated on people who are unaware of the scale and danger of the Darwin-ist. They are currently trying to keep Darwinism propped up with this trickery.Those who genuinely and sincerely love Allah must never fall for that trickery.

The Muslim Observer, 10-16 May 2007

MSNBC News Service, 25 July 2007 Welt Online, 26 July 2007

MSNBC News Service, 19 Jan 2006

110

111


All superstition will vanish in the face of Truth

Every superstitious religion will inevitably fail. This is an im-

mutable law of Allah. No matter how successful they may appear, no

matter how much dominion they enjoy, no matter how many people

they may influence and no matter how much success they appear to

enjoy, all superstitious faiths will inevitably fall. This law of Allah

never changes.

The Darwinists have failed to comprehend this great secret of

Allah’s. They never believed that Allah will inevitably inflict defeat

on every perverse idea. They imagined that the transitory victory be-

stowed on them by Allah was a gain and a superiority. They boasted

of this false victory and never foresaw that they would one day be re-

vealed as frauds.

Yet what they never foresaw or expected suddenly befell them.

They began to watch their own defeat in complete amazement. They

were unable to understand how it had happened. They were at a loss

to understand how the theory of evolution, protected under law in all

countries, taught in schools and imposed on professors, supported by

virtually all the major press and backed with a budget of millions of

dollars could have been swept away like this. They failed to compre-

hend how it was that the fossils completely refuting evolution they

had so carefully kept hidden away could suddenly have emerged into

the light of day at a time when evolution was so closely protected

under national laws, and how the fact that not even a single protein

112


can form by chance had come out into the open. They were stunned to

see that the Darwinist dictatorship could no longer protect them.

That huge defeat meant the end of the demagoguery and propa-

ganda that were Darwinists’ sole prop. Darwinists probably never

imagined that the day would come when they would have to abandon

their only means of deception. They never expected that their lies and

deceptions based on mass conditioning through the press, and

through pressure and imposition, would ever be exposed. They prob-

ably never dreamed that all their trickery would one day be unex-

pectedly exposed.

The Darwinists now have no way back. The true nature of their

deceptive claims that “The missing link has been found”, or “The

missing link has been observed” has now been revealed. A great many

people have now realized that evolution is a hollow fraud, devoid of

any evidence. Darwinists can use whatever propaganda methods they

like, and manufacture whatever false evidence they see fit and depict

that as the truth, but they will never be able to go back to their days of

glory. The Darwinist deception is finally at an end. This period we are

living in, when Darwinists are desperately making a last stand to keep

their deception alive, will witness a mighty defeat for them. There is

another very important point here that must not be forgotten. It is still

not too late for Darwinists. They can still turn away from, and make

up for, all their errors. The time has come for Darwinists to realize that

all power lies with Almighty Allah, and that whatever Allah ordains

will definitely come about. This will be of great benefit to them and

113


allow them to live honorable lives in this world and in the hereafter.

It must not be forgotten that no matter how much pride they have in

this world, no matter how much they wage an illegitimate struggle

against right and truth (surely Allah is beyond that), whatever our

Lord Allah ordains is what will happen. Darwinism will absolutely

come to an end in this century, and whether or not Darwinists want to

see it, the true faith of Allah will rule the world. Allah’s promise is the

Truth, and the Truth will certainly be made good.

Allah reveals in verses:

Say: ‘Truth has come and falsehood has vanished. Falsehood isalways bound to vanish.’ (Surat al-Isra’, 81)

Yes, everything in the heavens and earth belongs to Allah. Yes,Allah’s promise is true but most of them do not know it. (SurahYunus, 55)

So remain steadfast. Allah’s promise is true. Ask forgivenessfor your wrong action and glorify your Lord with praise in theevening and the early morning. Certainly those who argueabout the Signs of Allah without any authority having come tothem. (Surah Ghafir, 55-56)

Say: ‘The Truth has come. False-hood cannot originate or regener-ate.’ (Surah Saba’, 49)

114

115


Darwinism, in other words the theory of evolution, was put for-

ward with the aim of denying the fact of Creation, but is in truth noth-

ing but failed, unscientific nonsense. This theory, which claims that

life emerged by chance from inanimate matter, was invalidated by

the scientific evidence of miraculous order in the universe and in

living things, as well as by the discovery of more than 300 million

fossils revealing that evolution never happened. In this way, science

confirmed the fact that Allah created the universe and the living

things in it. The propaganda carried out today in order to keep the

theory of evolution alive is based solely on the distortion of the scien-

tific facts, biased interpretation, and lies and falsehoods disguised as

science.

Yet this propaganda cannot conceal the truth. The fact that the

theory of evolution is the greatest deception in the history of science

has been expressed more and more in the scientific world over the last

20-30 years. Research carried out after the 1980s in particular has re-

vealed that the claims of Darwinism are totally unfounded, something

that has been stated by a large number of scientists. In the United States

in particular, many scientists from such different fields as biology, bio-

chemistry and paleontology recognize the invalidity of Darwinism and

employ the fact of Creation to account for the origin of life.

We have examined the collapse of the theory of evolution and the

proofs of Creation in great scientific detail in many of our works, and

are still continuing to do so. Given the enormous importance of this

subject, it will be of great benefit to summarize it here.

The Scientific Collapse of DarwinismAs a pagan doctrine going back as far as ancient Greece, the the-

ory of evolution was advanced extensively in the nineteenth century.

The most important development that made it the top topic of the

world of science was Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species, pub-

lished in 1859. In this book, he opposed, in his own eyes, the fact that

Allah created different living species on Earth separately, for he erro-

neously claimed that all living beings had a common ancestor and had

diversified over time through small changes. Darwin's theory was not

based on any concrete scientific finding; as he also accepted, it was

just an "assumption." Moreover, as Darwin confessed in the long

chapter of his book titled "Difficulties on Theory," the theory failed

in the face of many critical questions.

Darwin invested all of his hopes in new scientific discoveries,

which he expected to solve these difficulties. However, contrary to his

expectations, scientific findings expanded the dimensions of these dif-

ficulties. The defeat of Darwinism in the face of science can be re-

viewed under three basic topics:

1) The theory cannot explain how life originated on Earth.

2) No scientific finding shows that the "evolutionary mechanisms"

proposed by the theory have any evolutionary power

at all.

3) The fossil record proves the exact oppo-

site of what the theory suggests.

In this section, we will examine

these three basic points in general

outlines:

116


Charles Darwin

117


The First Insurmountable Step:The Origin of Life

The theory of evolution posits that all living species evolved from

a single living cell that emerged on Earth 3.8 billion years ago, sup-

posed to have happened as a result of coincidences. How a single cell

could generate millions of complex living species and, if such an evo-

lution really occurred, why traces of it cannot be observed in the fos-

sil record are some of the questions that the theory cannot answer.

However, first and foremost, we need to ask: How did this "first cell"

originate?

Since the theory of evolution ignorantly denies Creation, it

maintains that the "first cell" originated as a product of blind coin-

cidences within the laws of nature, without any plan or arrange-

ment. According to the theory, inanimate matter must have produced

a living cell as a result of coincidences. Such a claim, however, is in-

consistent with the most unassailable rules of biology.

"Life Comes From Life"In his book, Darwin never referred to the origin of life. The prim-

itive understanding of science in his time rested on the assumption

that living beings had a very simple structure. Since medieval times,

spontaneous generation, which asserts that non-living materials came

together to form living organisms, had been widely accepted. It was

commonly believed that insects came into being from food leftovers,

and mice from wheat. Interesting experiments were conducted to

prove this theory. Some wheat was placed on a dirty piece of cloth,

and it was believed that mice would originate from it after a while.

Similarly, maggots developing in rotting meat was assumed to

be evidence of spontaneous generation. However, it was later under-

stood that worms did not appear on meat spontaneously, but were

carried there by flies in the form of

larvae, invisible to the naked eye. Even when Darwin wrote The

Origin of Species, the belief that bacte-ria could come into existence fromnon-living matter was widely acceptedin the world of science.

However, five years after the publi-cation of Darwin's book, Louis Pasteur an-nounced his results after long studies andexperiments, that disproved spontaneous generation, a cornerstoneof Darwin's theory. In his triumphal lecture at the Sorbonne in 1864,Pasteur said: "Never will the doctrine of spontaneous generation re-cover from the mortal blow struck by this simple experiment."5

For a long time, advocates of the theory of evolution resisted thesefindings. However, as the development of science unraveled the com-plex structure of the cell of a living being, the idea that life could comeinto being coincidentally faced an even greater impasse.

Inconclusive Efforts of the Twentieth CenturyThe first evolutionist who took up the subject of the origin of life

in the twentieth century was the renowned Russian biologist Alexan-

der Oparin. With various theses he advanced in the 1930s, he tried to

prove that a living cell could originate by coincidence. These studies,

however, were doomed to failure, and Oparin had to make the fol-

lowing confession: Unfortunately, however, the problem of the origin of the cell is per-haps the most obscure point in the whole study of the evolution oforganisms.6

118


Through his experiments, Louis Pasteur in-validated the idea that “life can emerge frominanimate matter,” which represents the foun-dation of the theory of evolution.

119


Evolutionist followers of Oparin tried to carry out experiments

to solve this problem. The best known experiment was carried out by

the American chemist Stanley Miller in 1953. Combining the gases he

alleged to have existed in the primordial Earth's atmosphere in an ex-

periment set-up, and adding energy to the mixture, Miller synthesized

several organic molecules (amino acids) present in the structure of

proteins.

Barely a few years had passed before it was revealed that this ex-

periment, which was then presented as an important step in the

name of evolution, was invalid, for the atmosphere used in the ex-

periment was very different from the real Earth conditions.7

After a long silence, Miller confessed that the atmosphere

medium he used was unrealistic.8

All the evolutionists' efforts throughout the twentieth century

to explain the origin of life ended in failure. The geochemist Jeffrey

Bada, from the San Diego Scripps Institute accepts this fact in an arti-

cle published in Earth magazine in 1998:

Today as we leave the twentieth century, we still face the biggest un-

solved problem that we had when we entered the twentieth century:

How did life originate on Earth?9

The Complex Structure of Life The primary reason why evolutionists ended up in such a great

impasse regarding the origin of life is that even those living organisms

Darwinists deemed to be the simplest have outstandingly complex

features. The cell of a living thing is more complex than all of our man-

made technological products. Today, even in the most developed lab-

oratories of the world, no single protein of the cell, let alone a living

cell itself, can be produced by bringing organic chemicals together.

The conditions required for the formation of a cell are too great in

quantity to be explained away by coincidences. However, there is no

need to explain the situation with these details. Evolutionists are at a

dead-end even before reaching the stage of the cell. That is because

the probability of just a single protein, an essential building block of

the cell, coming into being by chance is mathematically "0."

The main reason for this is the need for other proteins to be

present if one protein is to form, and this completely eradicates the

possibility of chance formation. This fact by itself is sufficient to

eliminate the evolutionist claim of chance right from the outset. To

summarize,

1. Protein cannot be synthesized without enzymes, and en-

zymes are all proteins.

2. Around 100 proteins need to be present in order for a single

protein to be synthesized. There therefore need to be proteins for

proteins to exist.

120


One of the facts nullify-ing the theory of evolutionis the incredibly complexstructure of life. The DNA mole-cule located in the nucleus of cells of livingbeings is an example of this. The DNA is a sort of databank formed of the arrange-ment of four different molecules in different sequences. This databank containsthe codes of all the physical traits of that living being. When the human DNA isput into writing, it is calculated that this would result in an encyclopedia made upof 900 volumes. Unquestionably, such extraordinary information definitively re-futes the concept of coincidence.

121


3. DNA manufactures the protein-synthesizing enzymes. Pro-

tein cannot be synthesized without DNA. DNA is therefore also

needed in order for proteins to form.

4. All the organelles in the cell have important tasks in protein

synthesis. In other words, in order for proteins to form a perfect and

fully functioning cell needs to exist together with all its organelles.

The DNA molecule, which is located in the nucleus of a cell and

which stores genetic information, is a magnificent databank. If the in-

formation coded in DNA were written down, it would make a giant

library consisting of an estimated 900 volumes of encyclopedias con-

sisting of 500 pages each.

A very interesting dilemma emerges at this point: DNA can repli-

cate itself only with the help of some specialized proteins (enzymes).

However, the synthesis of these enzymes can be realized only by the

information coded in DNA. As they both depend on each other, they

have to exist at the same time for replication. This brings the scenario

that life originated by itself to a deadlock. Prof. Leslie Orgel, an evo-

lutionist of repute from the University of San Diego, California, con-

fesses this fact in the September 1994 issue of the Scientific American

magazine:It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both ofwhich are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the sameplace at the same time. Yet it also seems impossible to have onewithout the other. And so, at first glance, one might have to concludethat life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means.10

No doubt, if it is impossible for life to have originated sponta-

neously as a result of blind coincidences, then it has to be accepted

that life was "created." This fact explicitly invalidates the theory of

evolution, whose main purpose is to deny Creation.

Imaginary Mechanism of Evolution The second important point that negates Darwin's theory is that

both concepts put forward by the theory as "evolutionary mecha-

nisms" were understood to have, in reality, no evolutionary power.

Darwin based his evolution allegation entirely on the mechanism

of "natural selection." The importance he placed on this mechanism

was evident in the name of his book: The Origin of Species, By Means of

Natural Selection…

Natural selection holds that those living things that are stronger

and more suited to the natural conditions of their habitats will survive

in the struggle for life. For example, in a deer herd under the threat of

attack by wild animals, those that can run faster will survive. There-

fore, the deer herd will be comprised of faster and stronger individu-

122


The mechanism of natural selection does not support the theory of evolution,because it can never enrich a species’ genetic information. It can never trans-form one species into another.

123


als. However, unquestionably, this mechanism will not cause deer to

evolve and transform themselves into another living species, for in-

stance, horses.

Therefore, the mechanism of natural selection has no evolu-

tionary power. Darwin was also aware of this fact and had to state

this in his book The Origin of Species:Natural selection can do nothing until favorable individual differ-ences or variations occur.11

Lamarck's ImpactSo, how could these "favorable variations" occur? Darwin tried

to answer this question from the standpoint of the primitive under-

standing of science at that time. According to the French biologist

Chevalier de Lamarck (1744-1829), who lived before Darwin, living

creatures passed on the traits they acquired during their lifetime to

the next generation. He asserted that these traits, which accumulated

from one generation to another, caused new species to be formed. For

instance, he claimed that giraffes evolved from antelopes; as they

struggled to eat the leaves of high trees, their necks were extended

from generation to generation.

Darwin also gave similar examples. In his book The Origin of

Species, for instance, he said that some bears going into water to find

food transformed themselves into whales over time.12

However, the laws of inheritance discovered by Gregor Mendel

(1822-84) and verified by the science of genetics, which flourished in

the twentieth century, utterly demolished the legend that acquired

traits were passed on to subsequent generations. Thus, natural selec-

tion fell out of favor as an evolutionary mechanism.

Neo-Darwinism and MutationsIn order to find a solution, Darwinists advanced the "Modern

Synthetic Theory," or as it is more commonly known, Neo-Darwin-

ism, at the end of the 1930s. Neo-Darwinism added mutations, which

are distortions formed in the genes of living beings due to such exter-

nal factors as radiation or replication errors, as the "cause of favorable

variations" in addition to natural mutation.

Today, the model that Darwinists espouse, despite their own

awareness of its scientific invalidity, is neo-Darwinism. The theory

maintains that millions of living beings formed as a result of a process

whereby numerous complex organs of these organisms (e.g., ears,

eyes, lungs, and wings) underwent "mutations," that is, genetic disor-

ders. Yet, there is an outright scientific fact that totally undermines

this theory: Mutations do not cause living beings to develop; on the

contrary, they are always harmful.

The reason for this is

very simple: DNA has a very

complex structure, and ran-

dom effects can only harm it.

The American geneticist B. G.

Ranganathan explains this as

follows:

124


Since the beginning of the twen-tieth century, evolutionary biolo-

gists have sought examples ofbeneficial mutations by creating

mutant flies. But these effortshave always resulted in sick anddeformed creatures. To the side

can be seen a fly subjected tomutation.

125


First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mu-tations are harmful since they are random, rather than orderlychanges in the structure of genes; any random change in a highly or-dered system will be for the worse, not for the better. For example, ifan earthquake were to shake a highly ordered structure such as abuilding, there would be a random change in the framework of thebuilding which, in all probability, would not be an improvement.13

Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful, that is,which is observed to develop the genetic code, has been observed sofar. All mutations have proved to be harmful. It was understood thatmutation, which is presented as an "evolutionary mechanism," is ac-tually a genetic occurrence that harms living things, and leaves themdisabled. (The most common effect of mutation on human beings iscancer.) Of course, a destructive mechanism cannot be an "evolution-ary mechanism." Natural selection, on the other hand, "can do nothingby itself," as Darwin also accepted. This fact shows us that there is no"evolutionary mechanism" in nature. Since no evolutionary mecha-nism exists, no such imaginary process called "evolution" could havetaken place.

The Fossil Record: No Sign of Intermediate Forms

The clearest evidence that the scenario suggested by the theory ofevolution did not take place is the fossil record.

According to the unscientific supposition of this theory, every liv-ing species has sprung from a predecessor. A previously existingspecies turned into something else over time and all species have comeinto being in this way. In other words, this transformation proceedsgradually over millions of years.

Had this been the case, numerous intermediary species shouldhave existed and lived within this long transformation period.

126

LIVING FOSSILS REFUTE EVOLUTION

Fossils are evidence that evolutionnever happened. As revealed by thefossil record, living organisms werecreated complete with all their char-acteristics, and have never changedsince they first appeared and for aslong as they existed. Fish have al-ways been fish, insects have alwaysbeen insects and reptiles have al-ways been reptiles. There are noscientific grounds for the claim thatspecies gradually develop. All be-ings are created by Allah.

Sun FishPeriod: Eocene Age: 54-37 million years

Crane FlyPeriod: Eocene Age: 48-37 million years

Sea UrchinPeriod: CarboniferousAge: 295 million years

127

FroghopperPeriod: Cretaceous Age: 125 million years

Sequoia LeafPeriod: Eocene Age: 48-37 million years

Birch Tree LeafPeriod: Eocene Age: 50 million years

Sea StarPeriod: Ordovician Age: 490-443 million years

For instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the

past which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish

traits they already had. Or there should have existed some reptile-

birds, which acquired some bird traits in addition to the reptilian traits

they already had. Since these would be in a transitional phase, they

should be disabled, defective, crippled living beings. Evolutionists

refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in

the past, as "transitional forms."

If such animals ever really existed, there should be millions and

even billions of them in number and variety. More importantly, the

remains of these strange creatures should be present in the fossil

record. In The Origin of Species, Darwin explained:If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking mostclosely all of the species of the same group together must assuredlyhave existed... Consequently, evidence of their former existencecould be found only amongst fossil remains.14

However, Darwin was well aware that no fossils of these inter-

mediate forms had yet been found. He regarded this as a major dif-

ficulty for his theory. In one chapter of his book titled "Difficulties on

Theory," he wrote:Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly finegradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitionalforms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the speciesbeing, as we see them, well defined?.. But, as by this theory innu-merable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not findthem embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?..Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum fullof such intermediate links? 15

128


129


Darwin's Hopes ShatteredHowever, although evolutionists have been making strenuous ef-

forts to find fossils since the middle of the nineteenth century all over

the world, no transitional forms have yet been uncovered. All of the

fossils, contrary to the evolutionists' expectations, show that life ap-

peared on Earth all of a sudden and fully-formed.

One famous British paleontologist, Derek V. Ager, admits this

fact, even though he is an evolutionist:The point emerges that if we examine the fossil record in detail,whether at the level of orders or of species, we find – over and overagain – not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of onegroup at the expense of another.16

This means that in the fossil record, all living species suddenly

emerge as fully formed, without any intermediate forms in between.

This is just the opposite of Darwin's assumptions. Also, this is very

strong evidence that all living things are created. The only explana-

tion of a living species emerging suddenly and complete in every de-

tail without any evolutionary ancestor is that it was created. This fact

is admitted also by the widely known evolutionist biologist Douglas

Futuyma:Creation and evolution, between them, exhaust the possible explanations

for the origin of living things. Organisms either appeared on the earth fully

developed or they did not. If they did not, they must have developed from

pre-existing species by some process of modification. If they did appear in a

fully developed state, they must indeed have been created by some omnipo-

tent intelligence.17

Fossils show that living beings emerged fully developed and

in a perfect state on the Earth. That means that "the origin of species,"

contrary to Darwin's supposition, is not evolution, but Creation.

The Tale of Human EvolutionThe subject most often brought up by advocates of the theory of

evolution is the subject of the origin of man. The Darwinist claim holds

that man evolved from so-called ape-like creatures. During this al-

leged evolutionary process, which is supposed to have started 4-5 mil-

lion years ago, some "transitional forms" between man and his

imaginary ancestors are supposed to have existed. According to this

completely imaginary scenario, four basic "categories" are listed:

1. Australopithecus

2. Homo habilis

3. Homo erectus

4. Homo sapiens

Evolutionists call man's so-called first ape-like ancestors Aus-

tralopithecus, which means "South African ape." These living beings

130


Evolutionist newspapers and magazines often print pictures of imaginary “prim-itive” man. The only available source for these pictures is the imagination ofthe artist. Evolutionary theory has been so dented by scientific data that todaywe see less and less of it in the serious press.

IMAGINARY

131


are actually nothing but an old ape species that has become extinct.

Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by

two world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely,

Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, shows that these

apes belonged to an ordinary ape species that became extinct and bore

no resemblance to humans.18

Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as

"homo," that is "man." According to their claim, the living beings in

the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus. Evolu-

tionists devise a fanciful evolution scheme by arranging different fos-

sils of these creatures in a particular order. This scheme is imaginary

because it has never been proved that there is an evolutionary rela-

tion between these different classes. Ernst Mayr, one of the twentieth

century's most important evolutionists, contends in his book One Long

Argument that "particularly historical [puzzles] such as the origin of

life or of Homo sapiens, are extremely difficult and may even resist a

final, satisfying explanation."19

By outlining the link chain as Australopithecus > Homo habilis >

Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of these

species is one another's ancestor. However, recent findings of pale-

oanthropologists have revealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and

Homo erectus lived at different parts of the world at the same time.20

Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus

have lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens neandarthalen-

sis and Homo sapiens sapiens (man) co-existed in the same region.21

This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim that

they are ancestors of one another. The late Stephen Jay Gould ex-

plained this deadlock of the theory of evolution although he was him-

self one of the leading advocates of evolution in the twentieth century:What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages

of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. ha-bilis), none clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of thethree display any evolutionary trends during their tenure on earth.22

Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is "upheld" with

the help of various drawings of some "half ape, half human" creatures

appearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by means of

propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.

Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected sci-

entists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years

and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded,

despite being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such

family tree branching out from ape-like creatures to man.

Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science" rang-

ing from those he considered scientific to those he considered unsci-

entific. According to Zuckerman's spectrum, the most

"scientific"—that is, depending on concrete data—fields of science are

chemistry and physics. After them come the biological sciences and

then the social sciences. At the far end of the spectrum, which is the

part considered to be most "unscientific," are "extra-sensory percep-

tion"—concepts such as telepathy and sixth sense—and finally

"human evolution." Zuckerman explains his reasoning:We then move right off the register of objective truth into those fieldsof presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception or theinterpretation of man's fossil history, where to the faithful [evolu-tionist] anything is possible – and where the ardent believer [in evo-lution] is sometimes able to believe several contradictorythings at the same time.23

132


133


The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but the prej-

udiced interpretations of some fossils unearthed by certain people,

who blindly adhere to their theory.

Darwinian Formula!Besides all the technical evidence we have dealt with so

far, let us now for once, examine what kind of a superstition

the evolutionists have with an example so simple as to be un-

derstood even by children:

The theory of evolution asserts that life is formed by

chance. According to this irrational claim, lifeless and

unconscious atoms came together to form the cell

and then they somehow formed other living

things, including man. Let us think about that.

When we bring together the elements that are the

building-blocks of life such as carbon, phosphorus,

nitrogen and potassium, only a heap is formed. No

matter what treatments it undergoes, this atomic

heap cannot form even a single living

being. If you like, let us formulate an

"experiment" on this subject

and let us examine on

the behalf of evolutionists what they really claim without pronounc-

ing loudly under the name "Darwinian formula":Let evolutionists put plenty of materials present in the compositionof living things such as phosphorus, nitrogen, carbon, oxygen, iron,and magnesium into big barrels. . Moreover, let them add in thesebarrels any material that does not exist under normal conditions, butthey think as necessary. Let them add in this mixture as many aminoacids and as many proteins—a single one of which can by no meansform by chance— as they like. Let them expose these mixtures to asmuch heat and moisture as they like. Let them stir these with what-ever technologically developed device they like. Let them put theforemost scientists beside these barrels. Let these experts wait in turnbeside these barrels for billions, and even trillions of years. Let thembe free to use all kinds of conditions they believe to be necessary fora human's formation. No matter what they do, they cannot producefrom these barrels a human, say a professor that examines his cellstructure under the electron microscope. They cannot produce gi-raffes, lions, bees, canaries, horses, dolphins, roses, orchids, lilies,carnations, bananas, oranges, apples, dates, tomatoes, melons, wa-termelons, figs, olives, grapes, peaches, peafowls, pheasants, multi-colored butterflies, or millions of other living beings such as these.Indeed, they could not obtain even a single cell of any one of them.

Briefly, unconscious atoms cannot form the cell by coming to-

gether. They cannot take a new decision and divide this cell into two,

then take other decisions and create the professors who first invent

the electron microscope and then examine their own cell structure

under that microscope. Matter is an unconscious, lifeless heap, and

it comes to life with Allah's superior creation.

The theory of evolution, which claims the opposite, is a total fal-

lacy completely contrary to reason. Thinking even a little bit on the

claims of evolutionists discloses this reality, just as in the above ex-

ample.

134


135


Technology in the Eye and the EarAnother subject that remains unanswered by evolutionary the-

ory is the excellent quality of perception in the eye and the ear. Before passing on to the subject of the eye, let us briefly answer

the question of how we see. Light rays coming from an object fall op-positely on the eye's retina. Here, these light rays are transmitted intoelectric signals by cells and reach a tiny spot at the back of the brain,the "center of vision." These electric signals are perceived in this cen-ter as an image after a series of processes. With this technical back-ground, let us do some thinking.

The brain is insulated from light. That means that its inside iscompletely dark, and that no light reaches the place where it is located.Thus, the "center of vision" is never touched by light and may even bethe darkest place you have ever known. However, you observe a lu-minous, bright world in this pitch darkness.

The image formed in the eye is so sharp and distinct that eventhe technology of the twentieth century has not been able to attainit. For instance, look at the book you are reading, your hands withwhich you are holding it, and then lift your head and look around you.Have you ever seen such a sharp and distinct image as this one at anyother place? Even the most developed television screen produced bythe greatest television producer in the world cannot provide such asharp image for you. This is a three-dimensional, colored, and ex-tremely sharp image. For more than 100 years, thousands of engineershave been trying to achieve this sharpness. Factories, huge premiseswere established, much research has been done, plans and designshave been made for this purpose. Again, look at a TV screen and thebook you hold in your hands. You will see that there is a big differencein sharpness and distinction. Moreover, the TV screen shows you atwo-dimensional image, whereas with your eyes, you watch a three-dimensional perspective with depth.

For many years, tens of thousands of engineers have tried to makea three-dimensional TV and achieve the vision quality of the eye. Yes,they have made a three-dimensional television system, but it is not pos-sible to watch it without putting on special 3-D glasses; moreover, it isonly an artificial three-dimension. The background is more blurred, theforeground appears like a paper setting. Never has it been possible toproduce a sharp and distinct vision like that of the eye. In both the cam-era and the television, there is a loss of image quality.

Evolutionists claim that the mechanism producing this sharp anddistinct image has been formed by chance. Now, if somebody told youthat the television in your room was formed as a result of chance, thatall of its atoms just happened to come together and make up this de-vice that produces an image, what would you think? How can atomsdo what thousands of people cannot?

If a device producing a more primitive image than the eye couldnot have been formed by chance, then it is very evident that the eyeand the image seen by the eye could not have been formed by chance.The same situation applies to the ear. The outer ear picks up the avail-able sounds by the auricle and directs them to the middle ear, the mid-dle ear transmits the sound vibrations by intensifying them, and theinner ear sends these vibrations to the brain by translating them intoelectric signals. Just as with the eye, the act of hearing finalizes in thecenter of hearing in the brain.

The situation in the eye is also true for the ear. That is, the brain isinsulated from sound just as it is from light. It does not let any soundin. Therefore, no matter how noisy is the outside, the inside of the brainis completely silent. Nevertheless, the sharpest sounds are perceived inthe brain. In your completely silent brain, you listen to symphonies,and hear all of the noises in a crowded place. However, were thesound level in your brain measured by a precise device at that mo-ment, complete silence would be found to be prevailing there.

136


137


As is the case with imagery, decades of effort have been spent in

trying to generate and reproduce sound that is faithful to the original.

The results of these efforts are sound recorders, high-fidelity systems,

and systems for sensing sound. Despite all of this technology and the

thousands of engineers and experts who have been working on this

endeavor, no sound has yet been obtained that has the same sharp-

ness and clarity as the sound perceived by the ear. Think of the high-

est-quality hi-fi systems produced by the largest company in the music

industry. Even in these devices, when sound is recorded some of it is

lost; or when you turn on a hi-fi you always hear a hissing sound be-

fore the music starts. However, the sounds that are the products of the

human body's technology are extremely sharp and clear. A human ear

never perceives a sound accompanied by a hissing sound or with at-

mospherics as does a hi-fi; rather, it perceives sound exactly as it is,

sharp and clear. This is the way it has been since the creation of man.

So far, no man-made visual or recording apparatus has been as

sensitive and successful in perceiving sensory data as are the eye and

the ear. However, as far as seeing and hearing are concerned, a far

greater truth lies beyond all this.

To Whom Does the Consciousness that Sees andHears within the Brain Belong?

Who watches an alluring world in the brain, listens to sym-

phonies and the twittering of birds, and smells the rose?

The stimulations coming from a person's eyes, ears, and nose

travel to the brain as electro-chemical nerve impulses. In biology,

physiology, and biochemistry books, you can find many details about

how this image forms in the brain. However, you will never come

across the most important fact: Who perceives these electro-chemical

nerve impulses as images, sounds, odors, and sensory events in the

brain? There is a consciousness in the brain that perceives all this

without feeling any need for an eye, an ear, and a nose. To whom

does this consciousness belong? Of course it does not belong to the

nerves, the fat layer, and neurons comprising the brain. This is why

Darwinist-materialists, who believe that everything is comprised of

matter, cannot answer these questions.

For this consciousness is the spirit created by Allah, which

needs neither the eye to watch the images nor the ear to hear the

sounds. Furthermore, it does not need the brain to think.

Everyone who reads this explicit and scientific fact should ponder

on Almighty Allah, and fear and seek refuge in Him, for He squeezes

the entire universe in a pitch-dark place of a few cubic centimeters in

a three-dimensional, colored, shadowy, and luminous form.

138


We live our whole life in our brains. People we see, flowers we smell, music wehear, fruit we taste, the moisture we feel with our hands—all these are impres-sions that become "reality" in the brain. But no colors, voices or pictures existthere. We live in an environment of electrical impulses. This is no theory, but thescientific explanation of how we perceive the outside world.

139


A Materialist FaithThe information we have presented so far shows us that the the-

ory of evolution is incompatible with scientific findings. The the-

ory's claim regarding the origin of life is inconsistent with science, the

evolutionary mechanisms it proposes have no evolutionary power,

and fossils demonstrate that the required intermediate forms have

never existed. So, it certainly follows that the theory of evolution

should be pushed aside as an unscientific idea. This is how many

ideas, such as the Earth-centered universe model, have been taken out

of the agenda of science throughout history.

However, the theory of evolution is kept on the agenda of sci-

ence. Some people even try to represent criticisms directed against it

as an "attack on science." Why?

The reason is that this theory is an indispensable dogmatic belief

for some circles. These circles are blindly devoted to materialist phi-

losophy and adopt Darwinism because it is the only materialist ex-

planation that can be put forward to explain the workings of nature.

Interestingly enough, they also confess this fact from time to time.

A well-known geneticist and an outspoken evolutionist, Richard C.

Lewontin from Harvard University, confesses that he is "first and fo-

remost a materialist and then a scientist":It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow com-pel us accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but,on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to ma-terial causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of con-cepts that produce material explanations, no matter howcounter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. More-over, that materialism is absolute, so we cannot allow a Divine [in-tervention]...24

These are explicit statements that Darwinism is a dogma kept

alive just for the sake of adherence to materialism. This dogma main-

tains that there is no being save matter. Therefore, it argues that inan-

imate, unconscious matter brought life into being. It insists that mil-

lions of different living species (e.g., birds, fish, giraffes, tigers, insects,

trees, flowers, whales, and human beings) originated as a result of the

interactions between matter such as pouring rain, lightning flashes,

and so on, out of inanimate matter. This is a precept contrary both to

reason and science. Yet Darwinists continue to ignorantly defend it

just so as not to acknowledge, in their own eyes, the evident existence

of Allah.

Anyone who does not look at the origin of living beings with a

materialist prejudice sees this evident truth: All living beings are

works of a Creator, Who is All-Powerful, All-Wise, and All-Knowing.

This Creator is Allah, Who created the whole universe from non-ex-

istence, in the most perfect form, and fashioned all living beings.

The Theory of Evolution: The Most Potent Spell in the World

Anyone free of prejudice and the influence of any particular ide-

ology, who uses only his or her reason and logic, will clearly under-

stand that belief in the theory of evolution, which brings to mind the

superstitions of societies with no knowledge of science or civilization,

is quite impossible.

As explained above, those who believe in the theory of evolution

think that a few atoms and molecules thrown into a huge vat could

produce thinking, reasoning professors and university students; such

scientists as Einstein and Galileo; such artists as Humphrey Bogart,

Frank Sinatra and Luciano Pavarotti; as well as antelopes, lemon trees,

and carnations. Moreover, as the scientists and professors who believe

in this nonsense are educated people, it is quite justifiable to speak of

this theory as "the most potent spell in history." Never before has any

140


141


other belief or idea so taken away peoples' powers of reason, refused

to allow them to think intelligently and logically, and hidden the truth

from them as if they had been blindfolded. This is an even worse and

unbelievable blindness than the totem worship in some parts of Africa,

the people of Saba worshipping the Sun, the tribe of the Prophet Abra-

ham (pbuh) worshipping idols they had made with their own hands,

or some among the people of the Prophet Moses (pbuh) worshipping

the Golden Calf.

In fact, Allah has pointed to this lack of reason in the Qur'an. In

many verses, He reveals that some peoples' minds will be closed and

that they will be powerless to see the truth. Some of these verses are

as follows:

As for those who do not believe, it makes no difference to themwhether you warn them or do not warn them, they will not believe.Allah has sealed up their hearts and hearing and over their eyes isa blindfold. They will have a terrible punishment. (Surat al-Baqara, 6-7)

… They have hearts with which they do not understand. They haveeyes with which they do not see. They have ears with which theydo not hear. Such people are like cattle. No, they are even furtherastray! They are the unaware. (Surat al-A'raf, 179)

Even if We opened up to them a door into heaven, and they spentthe day ascending through it, they would only say: "Our eyesightis befuddled! Or rather we have been put under a spell!" (Surat al-Hijr, 14-15)

Words cannot express just how astonishing it is that this spell

should hold such a wide community in thrall, keep people from the

truth, and not be broken for 150 years. It is understandable that one or

a few people might believe in impossible scenarios and claims full of

stupidity and illogicality. However, "magic" is the only possible ex-

planation for people from all over the world believing that uncon-

scious and lifeless atoms suddenly decided to come together and form

a universe that functions with a flawless system of organization, dis-

cipline, reason, and consciousness; a planet named Earth with all of its

features so perfectly suited to life; and living things full of countless

complex systems.

In fact, in the Qur'an Allah relates the incident of the Prophet Moses

(pbuh) and Pharaoh to show that some people who support atheistic

philosophies actually influence others by magic. When Pharaoh was

told about the true religion, he told the Prophet Moses (pbuh) to meet

with his own magicians. When the Prophet Moses (pbuh) did so, he told

them to demonstrate their abilities first. The verses continue:

He said: "You throw." And when they threw, they cast a spell onthe people's eyes and caused them to feel great fear of them. Theyproduced an extremely powerful magic. (Surat al-A'raf, 116)

As we have seen, Pharaoh's magicians were able to deceive every-

one, apart from the Prophet Moses (pbuh) and those who believed in

him. However, his evidence broke the spell, or "swallowed up what

they had forged," as revealed in the verse:

We revealed to Moses: "Throw down your staff." And it immedi-ately swallowed up what they had forged. So the Truth took placeand what they did was shown to be false. (Surat al-A'raf, 117-118)

As we can see, when people realized that a spell had been cast

upon them and that what they saw was just an illusion, Pharaoh's ma-

gicians lost all credibility. In the present day too, unless those who,

under the influence of a similar spell, believe in these ridiculous claims

under their scientific disguise and spend their lives defending them,

abandon their superstitious beliefs, they also will be humiliated when

the full truth emerges and the spell is broken. In fact, world-renowned

British writer and philosopher Malcolm Muggeridge, who was an

142


143


atheist defending evolution for some 60 years, but who subsequently

realized the truth, reveals the position in which the theory of evolution

would find itself in the near future in these terms:

I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially

the extent to which it's been applied, will be one of the great

jokes in the history books in the future. Posterity will marvel

that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted

with the incredible credulity that it has.25

That future is not far off: On the contrary, people will soon see that

"chance" is not a deity, and will look back on the theory of evolution as

the worst deceit and the most terrible spell in the world. That spell is

already rapidly beginning to be lifted from the shoulders of people all

over the world. Many people who see its true face are wondering with

amazement how they could ever have been taken in by it.

144


1. Letters, Seeds of Reality, p. 5532. John Daniel, Two Faces of Freema-sonry, A Picture Book Supplement to Vol-ume One – Third Edition of Scarlet andthe Beast, Day Publishing, 2007, p. 121 3. James Owen, Evolution Less Acceptedin U.S. Than Other Western Countries,Study Finds, 10 August 2006 -http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/08/060810-evolution.html4. Ben Stein, Expelled "No Intelligence Al-lowed", 20085. Sidney Fox, Klaus Dose, Molecular Evo-lution and The Origin of Life, New York:Marcel Dekker, 1977, p. 2.6. Alexander I. Oparin, Origin of Life,(1936) New York, Dover Publications,1953 (Reprint), p. 196.7. "New Evidence on Evolution of EarlyAtmosphere and Life", Bulletin of theAmerican Meteorological Society, vol. 63,November 1982, pp. 1328-1330. 8. Stanley Miller, Molecular Evolution ofLife: Current Status of the Prebiotic Syn-thesis of Small Molecules, 1986, p. 7.9. Jeffrey Bada, Earth, February 1998, p.40.10. Leslie E. Orgel, The Origin of Life onEarth, Scientific American, vol. 271, Octo-ber 1994, p. 78.11. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species:A Facsimile of the First Edition, HarvardUniversity Press, 1964, p. 189.12. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species:A Facsimile of the First Edition, HarvardUniversity Press, 1964, p. 184.13. B. G. Ranganathan, Origins?, Pennsyl-vania: The Banner Of Truth Trust, 1988.

14. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species:A Facsimile of the First Edition, HarvardUniversity Press, 1964, p. 179.15. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species,pp. 172, 280.16. Derek A. Ager, "The Nature of the Fos-sil Record", Proceedings of the British Ge-ological Association, vol. 87, 1976, p. 133.17. Douglas J. Futuyma, Science on Trial,New York: Pantheon Books, 1983. p. 197.18. Solly Zuckerman, Beyond The IvoryTower, New York: Toplinger Publications,1970, pp. 75-94; Charles E. Oxnard, "ThePlace of Australopithecines in HumanEvolution: Grounds for Doubt", Nature,vol. 258, p. 389. 19. J. Rennie, "Darwin's Current Bulldog:Ernst Mayr", Scientific American, Decem-ber 199220. Alan Walker, Science, vol. 207, 1980, p.1103; A. J. Kelso, Physical Anthropology,1st edition, New York: J. B. Lipincott Co.,1970, p. 221; M. D. Leakey, OlduvaiGorge, vol. 3, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1971, p. 272.21. Time, November 1996. 22. S. J. Gould, Natural History, vol. 85,1976, p. 30.23. Solly Zuckerman, Beyond The IvoryTower, New York: Toplinger Publications,1970, p. 19.24. Richard Lewontin, "The Demon-Haunted World", The New York Reviewof Books, 9 January, 1997, p. 28.25. Malcolm Muggeridge, The End ofChristendom, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,1980, p. 43.

NOTES

Date post:	16-Apr-2017
Category:	Science
Upload:	harunyahyaenglish
View:	72 times
Download:	3 times