+ All Categories
Home > Education > Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

Date post: 22-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: cornelius-puschmann
View: 1,426 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Held on May 25th 2012 at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA) in Phoenix. Thanks to Hallvard Moe (http://hm.uib.no/) and Anders Larsson (http://www.andersoloflarsson.se/) for organizing an excellent session!
14
Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research Cornelius Puschmann, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Jean Burgess, Queensland University of Technology Axel Bruns, Queensland University of Technology Merja Mahrt, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf ICA 2012 Track: Communication and Technology Session: Researching Social Media: Ethical and Methodological Challenges 26 May 2012, Phoenix
Transcript
Page 1: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services:Issues for Twitter Research

Cornelius Puschmann, Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinJean Burgess, Queensland University of TechnologyAxel Bruns, Queensland University of Technology

Merja Mahrt, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf

ICA 2012Track: Communication and Technology

Session: Researching Social Media: Ethical and Methodological Challenges

26 May 2012, Phoenix

Page 2: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

“There are also significant questions of truth, control, and power in Big Data studies: researchers have the tools and the access, while social media users as a whole do not. Their data were created in highly context-sensitive spaces, and it is entirely possible that some users would not give permission for their data to be used elsewhere.”(boyd & Crawford, 2012, p.12)

Page 3: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

#1Access, control, ownership and interpretation of data are interrelated facets that raise questions of power.

#2Market, legislation, social norms and code are dynamic regulatory forces in social web platforms.

Page 4: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

Data

Access (technology) Control (ability)

Ownership (law) Interpretation (competence)

TOS“law”

API“code”defines enables

Page 5: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

• founded in 2006 by Jack Dorsey• 140 mio active users• 340 mio tweets per day• source of real-time information on a breadth of issues

from pop culture to politics • increasingly used as a data source among researchers

(e.g. on election prediction via Twitter: Tumasjan et al, 2010, Jungherr et al, 2011, Gayo-Avello, 2012)

Page 6: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

• Twitter‘s (future) business model is based on advertising• ad revenue of $260 mio in 2012• sources of revenue:• promoted accounts• promoted tweets• promoted trends

Page 7: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

“What‘s yours is yours (but also ours)”

Terms of Service

Twitter Rules

API Rules

“..but only if youknow how to get it”

“Don‘t do what gets us into trouble”

Page 8: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

“By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute such Content in any and all media or distribution methods (now known or later developed).”

“You agree that this license includes the right for Twitter to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals who partner with Twitter for the syndication, broadcast, distribution or publication of such Content on other media and services, subject to our terms and conditions for such Content use.”

“We encourage and permit broad re-use of Content. The Twitter API exists to enable this.”

The TOS

Page 9: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

“You will not attempt or encourage others to: sell, rent, lease, sublicense, redistribute, or syndicate access to the Twitter API or Twitter Content to any third party without prior written approval from Twitter. If you provide an API that returns Twitter data, you may only return IDs (including tweet IDs and user IDs). You may export or extract non-programmatic, GUI-driven Twitter Content as a PDF or spreadsheet by using "save as" or similar functionality. Exporting Twitter Content to a datastore as a service or other cloud based service, however, is not permitted.”

“Except as permitted through the Services (or these Terms), you have to use the Twitter API if you want to reproduce, modify, create derivative works, distribute, sell, transfer, publicly display, publicly perform, transmit, or otherwise use the Content or Services.”

API Rules

Page 10: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

REST API Streaming APISearch API

• similar to site search functionality• originally a third-

party product• rate-limited• use of Streaming

API for high velocity queries is recommended

• allows interaction with Twitter similar to an individual user (“core” data)• rate-limited• whitelisting was

previously possible, now discontinued

• real-time access to information moving through Twitter• for developers with

“data-intensive needs”

The APIs

Page 11: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

• Twitter doesn‘t look to analytics as a source of revenue• providing data is costly in terms of computing resources • analytics are left to companies like Gnip and Datasift• these data resellers have little to gain by catering to the

scientific community or Twitter‘s users

Intermediaries of Data

Page 12: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

TwitterData reseller

(Gnip, Datasift)

Large data interpreter

(orga.)

Small data interpreter(individual)

Individual user

Log data

Historical data

Real-time data (all)

Real-time data

(sample)

Actors and Options

Page 13: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

• the exact sample size and quality of any data from Twitter is unknown (see e.g. Gnip‘s Power Track) • TOS and API regulate access to Twitter data for

different actors (users, researchers) on different levels (access, control, ownership, interpretation)• for users, the API is the only point of access to

“their” data apart from the web interface• the implicit audience for virtually all services built on

Twitter data are companies• both users and scholars lacking access to high-

performance computing infrastructure are likely to be sidelined by the trend towards Big Twitter Data

Conclusions

Page 14: Data Access, Ownership and Control in Social Web Services: Issues for Twitter Research

Thank you for your attention!

Contact: Cornelius [email protected] / @coffee001

images retrieved from Twitter 1% random sample


Recommended