+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Data Fusion Methods

Data Fusion Methods

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: azizbahmani
View: 225 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 27

Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    1/27

    5/29/12

    Data Fusion MethodsNeural Network

    Probabilistic model

    Time series

    Kalman filtering

    Other methods:

    A-distributed database query methods

    B-mobile agent based data fusion

    C-processing according to message

    categories 11

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    2/27

    5/29/12

    Neural Network

    neural-networks use unsupervised learningmethods forcategorization of the sensoryinputs

    No need for uncertainties or model of sensors

    Combine NN and discrete waveform transform(initial data-processing)to extract features

    data robustness against malfunctioningsensors

    Combine GROUP and Neural network

    22

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    3/27

    5/29/12 33

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    4/27

    5/29/12 44

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    5/27

    5/29/12

    Probabilistic modelpredicts the monitored data by maintaining a

    pair of probabilistic models over the networkattributes, one distributed in network and

    another at base station.

    When the gap between predicted data andsensed data is within the required error

    bound, the node does not need to report thesensed data, the base station uses thepredicted data as sensed data.

    the better the user can tolerate the error, the

    more energy can be saved. 55

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    6/27

    5/29/12

    Probabilistic modelwhere users need not only the result of the

    object, but also all the information aboutevery node.

    Where need to get the information as muchaspossible without too much network cost

    data is correlative in temporal or space

    data within the tolerance value will not betransmitted, So the accuracy is lowest

    energy saving depend on the model and

    tolerance value. 66

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    7/27

    5/29/12 77

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    8/27

    5/29/12

    Time series modelGood scalability

    Algorithm divided into three phases: history

    data gathering, data predicating and datachecking

    Time series models like autoregressivepredicative algorithm can realize more

    accurate predication. simpler and moresuitable for WSNs.

    little data needs to be transmitted no matterhow high frequency the sample rate is,(save

    energy. ) 88

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    9/27

    5/29/12

    Kalman FilteringPredict state of dynamic system( position ,velocity )in noisy environment.

    reduce the affect of white Gauss noise, so the datais more accurate, while the others are of loweraccuracy

    reduce the impact ofabnormal data (environmentinterference or the problem of the sensor node), soas to get more accurate information.

    Transmits fused data instead of the raw data (saveenergy).

    99

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    10/27

    5/29/12 1010

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    11/27

    5/29/12

    Distributed Kalman

    Filtering Decomposes KF into n collaborative micro-KFs with

    local communication

    Distributed algorithm for Kalman filtering

    Applicable in large-scale sensor networks withlimited capabilities (e.g. local communication,routing)

    Excellent robustness properties regardingvarious network imperfections, including delay,link loss, network fragmentation, andasynchronous operation

    Assumes identical sensing models across WSN1111

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    12/27

    5/29/12

    Comparision

    1212

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    13/27

    5/29/12

    Other methods:

    A. Distributed databasequerynetwork which the user queries informationaccording to requirement

    Consider the WSNs as a distributed database,each node stores very little data of database,

    query result returns to the user in the form ofmulti-hop: such as TAG & TINA

    1313

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    14/27

    5/29/12

    TAG: a Tiny AggregationService for Ad-HocSensor NetworksTAG adopts a query grammar similar to SQL;

    COUNT, MIN, MAX, SUM, and AVERAGE.Flooding: sink broadcaststhe request

    message, If the message is received not forthe first time, it will be dropped, otherwise the

    node sending this message will be taken as itsparent until the requested message reachesevery node in the network, meanwhile anaggregation tree is formed. In the result

    returning phase, data is fused during the 1414

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    15/27

    5/29/12 1515

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    16/27

    5/29/12

    TiNA: A Scheme for TemporalCoherency-Aware in-NetworkAggregationif the query rate is very high or very dense

    communication, the network will not be ableto provide exact answers at the specified rate.

    reduce the amount of information transmittedand to improve quality of data when not allsensor readings can be transmitted (reducepower consumption by up to 50% without any

    loss in the quality of data.)

    Data will not be reported if the gap betweenthe data and the one just report is within thetolerance value.(exploiting end-user toleranceto temporal coherency) 1616

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    17/27

    5/29/12

    transmitting a single bit of data is equivalent

    to 800 instructions.a AA battery pack will allow a sensor to send

    5.52 million messages which is equivalent toone message per second every day for about

    two months 1717

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    18/27

    5/29/12

    B. Mobile Agent Based

    Data Fusionsensed data is stored in local node.

    mobile agent migrates among the nodes

    according to the requirement, and gets thedata of the nodes one by one. Then the agentfuses the data with previous results.

    Less demand for bandwidth, lower energy

    consumption and latency.

    If combined with mobile agent routingstrategy, it could reduce congestioneffectively.

    1818

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    19/27

    5/29/12

    C. Processing According

    to Message Categoriesclassify the message into emergency one and

    non-emergency one

    For emergency one, the nodes forward itimmediately to meet the requirement ofreal-time system.

    in the abnormal detection network to be

    reported in time.

    1919

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    20/27

    5/29/12

    D. Data Compression

    for the applications requiring all the raw data

    node compresses the data before

    transmitting, and the sink node decompressesthe data after receiving it. (some energyconsumption, but better than sending rawdata)

    data compression techniques , such as sortingencode based data compression algorithm,relevance based compression algorithm, etc.

    sorting encode based data compression:

    some nodes value is expressed by other 2020

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    21/27

    5/29/12

    Data Compression

    Using joint entropy and bit-hop metric toquantify the size of compressed data and totalcost of joint routing with compression

    respectively.

    Three schemes: DSC, RDC and CDR.

    2121

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    22/27

    5/29/12

    Distributed Source Coding (DSC): If the sensornodes have perfect knowledge about theircorrelations, they can encode/compress dataso as to avoid transmitting redundantinformation. In this case, each source cansend its data to the sink along the shortestpath possiblewithout the need for

    intermediate aggregation. 2222

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    23/27

    5/29/12

    Routing Driven Compression (RDC): In this

    scheme, the sensor nodes do not have anyknowledge about their correlations and senddata along the shortest paths to the sink whileallowing for opportunistic aggregation

    wherever the paths overlap. 2323

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    24/27

    5/29/12

    Compression Driven Routing (CDR): As inRDC, nodes have no knowledge of thecorrelations but the data is aggregated closeto the sources and initially routed so as to

    allow for maximum possible aggregation at2424

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    25/27

    5/29/12

    DSC(Distributed Source Coding ) performs theideal bit-hop metric based on having knownthe correlations, and its bit-hop metric is the

    lower bound for any possible routing schemewith lossless compression.

    RDC outperforms CDR for low correlation(little data can be compressed) while CDRoutperforms RDC for high correlation.

    Neither RDC nor CDR performs well forintermediate correlation. In this case, a hybrid

    scheme can be adopted. 2525

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    26/27

    5/29/12

    Conclusion and future

    studyIn-network data processing is a unique

    characteristic that differentiates wirelesssensor networks from conventional data

    forwarding networks.

    Classify routing schemes supporting datafusion in wireless sensor networks into threecategories: routing-driven, coding-driven, andfusion-driven

    Chal1:obtaining data correlation, whichserves as the foundation for coding-driven

    and fusion-driven approaches, is still a 2626

  • 7/31/2019 Data Fusion Methods

    27/27

    5/29/12

    future study

    while the fusion process curtails dataredundancy, it also decreases the reliability ofrouting schemes. In lossy and uncertain

    wireless environments, a certain degree ofredundancy must be preserved in order toachieve the desired fault tolerance andreliability. Embedding this consideration in the

    routing design is desirable.

    in-network fusion will inevitably introducedelay in routing schemes, due to either theprocessing itself or the waiting time for side

    information (need to provide mechanisms for2727


Recommended