Date post: | 20-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | datastax-academy |
View: | 377 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1 The Elephant in the room
2 Major Pivots to consider
3 Resiliency, Scale and Upgrades
4 Security
5 Multi-Model Platform
7 Conclusion
2 © 2015. All Rights Reserved.
©2015 DataStax Confidential. Do not distribute without consent. 4
A sane landscape view
OLTP OLAP S
cale
, Spe
ed, F
lexi
bilit
y
SLAs, Response times, Data Sets
2000's
2015
Resiliency
©2014 DataStax Confidential. Do not distribute without consent.
H/W Stream Processors
Operational Readiness
Dat
a S
et S
ize
Operational Analytics
Exploratory Analytics
Non Linear Innovation
The elephant's place
©2015 DataStax Confidential. Do not distribute without consent. 6
Pivots to consider
TCO per feature for your use case
over a 3-5 year duration
Geo Resiliency
7
OR
©2015 DataStax Confidential. Do not distribute without consent.
San Francisco
New York
Stockholm
Linear Scaling
©2015 DataStax Confidential. Do not distribute without consent.
http://www.datastax.com/apache-cassandra-leads-nosql-benchmark
End Point Report Excerpt: Balanced Read/Write YCSB Test
The road to Multi Model
© 2015. All Rights Reserved. 12
Application Application
Application (OLTP and OLAP)
Data Access Abstraction
RDBMS / SQL Polyglot Persistence
Multi Model
DSE Multi Model
© 2015. All Rights Reserved. 13
Multiple (polygot) Models exposed via cohesive interaction mechanisms, (APIs) for OLTP and OLAP workloads, (mixed workload) with a unified persistence layer, (Apache Cassandra) providing GR, always on characteristics within a TCO efficient data base platform for a variety of use cases
Cassandra
©2015 DataStax Confidential. Do not distribute without consent. 14
Conclusion • TCO per feature for your use case over 3-5 year duration
• One size (elephant) doesn't fit all
• Business Flexibility – Scale up/down linearly on demand
• Comprehensive Security, Enuf said! • Multi Model platform, which isn't niche
©2015 DataStax Confidential. Do not distribute without consent. 16
Avoid arbitrary preferences for (or against) OSS based on ideology or unproven and wishful thinking expectations; instead, consider OSS on the merits of the software compared with the alternatives (closed source or homegrown), based on fitness of purpose, quality, and sufficient technical and legal risk management (self-supported or third party).
- Gartner Source: Gartner – Understanding the Challenges of Open Source Software