Date post: | 27-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lindsey-blake |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 1 times |
David Ramirez, P.E.David Ramirez, P.E.Senior HydrologistSenior Hydrologist
Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center Slidell, LALower Mississippi River Forecast Center Slidell, LA
Real-Time Operation of HEC-RAS at the Real-Time Operation of HEC-RAS at the Lower Mississippi River Forecast CenterLower Mississippi River Forecast Center
USACE/NWS/USGSUSACE/NWS/USGSAnnual Tri-Agency Coordination MeetingAnnual Tri-Agency Coordination Meeting
Oct. 30 – 31, 2007Oct. 30 – 31, 2007
• Used for locations where hydrologic Used for locations where hydrologic techniques do not work as welltechniques do not work as well– Storm surge and other tidal effectsStorm surge and other tidal effects– Areas affected by backwaterAreas affected by backwater– Levee breachesLevee breaches– Off-channel storage areasOff-channel storage areas– Lateral inputs/diversionsLateral inputs/diversions– Dam breaksDam breaks
LMRFC Hydraulic LMRFC Hydraulic ModelingModeling
• Hydrologic ModelingHydrologic Modeling– Continuity equation and relationship Continuity equation and relationship
between storage in the reach and between storage in the reach and discharge at the outlet.discharge at the outlet.
• Hydraulic ModelingHydraulic Modeling– Continuity equation and the momentum Continuity equation and the momentum
equation. equation. – Unsteady flow routing is more physically Unsteady flow routing is more physically
based and is applicable to wider range based and is applicable to wider range of applications.of applications.
Hydraulic vs. Hydrologic Hydraulic vs. Hydrologic ModelingModeling
• Large number of existing models available Large number of existing models available from other agencies, state, and local from other agencies, state, and local governments.governments.
• Data format is compatible with many other Data format is compatible with many other software packages. software packages.
• Excellent technical support, training and Excellent technical support, training and user documentationuser documentation
• Modeling software is continuing to be Modeling software is continuing to be developed by HECdeveloped by HEC
Why HEC-RAS?Why HEC-RAS?
Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis SystemRiver Analysis System
(HEC-RAS)(HEC-RAS)
• One-dimensional model.One-dimensional model.
• Current capabilities:Current capabilities:– Subcritical & Supercritical flowSubcritical & Supercritical flow– Mixed regime (transcritical flow)Mixed regime (transcritical flow)– Hydraulic structures, e.g. culverts, bridges, Hydraulic structures, e.g. culverts, bridges,
weirs, etc. weirs, etc. – Unsteady flow analysisUnsteady flow analysis– Mobile Boundary Hydraulics (sediment Mobile Boundary Hydraulics (sediment
transport)transport)– Water Quality ModelingWater Quality Modeling
Data Requirements for a Data Requirements for a Hydraulic ModelHydraulic Model
• Geometry data:Geometry data:– cross sections & hydraulic structures: In-channel cross sections & hydraulic structures: In-channel
from field surveys and over bank from LIDARfrom field surveys and over bank from LIDAR– distance between cross-sectionsdistance between cross-sections
• Surface Roughness (e.g. Manning’s n)Surface Roughness (e.g. Manning’s n)
• Upstream and downstream boundary Upstream and downstream boundary conditions (flow, stage, rating curves, conditions (flow, stage, rating curves, normal depth)normal depth)
HEC Geo-RASHEC Geo-RAS
• New model development can use GISNew model development can use GIS• Geo-referenced hydraulic models can be Geo-referenced hydraulic models can be
developed using a digital terrain model developed using a digital terrain model created with ESRI’s ARCGIS. created with ESRI’s ARCGIS.
• Using a DTM for model geometry requires Using a DTM for model geometry requires less surveyed cross sectional information. less surveyed cross sectional information. (Saves time and money!)(Saves time and money!)
• Geo-referenced hydraulic models can Geo-referenced hydraulic models can produce inundation mapsproduce inundation maps
HEC-RASHEC-RAS
Standard Hydraulic Geometry
Standard Hydraulic Geometry
TIN Processing
TIN Processing
WSE @ Cross SectionsHEC-RAS HEC-2 Cross
Sections
Hydrographic Survey
Inundated Area
Intersect Continuous WS with Land (terrain-based interpolation)
ARC/INFO
& ArcView
River Hydraulics ModelTopographic
Survey
Floodplain & Channel
TIN
Cross Sections
Extraction
FLOODPLAIN MAP
HEC Geo-RASHEC Geo-RAS
Incorporating HEC-RAS intoIncorporating HEC-RAS into LMRFC Operations LMRFC Operations
NWSRFSNWSRFSHydrologicHydrologic
ModelModel
Standard Standard Hydrologic Hydrologic Exchange Exchange
Format Format (SHEF)(SHEF)
HEC-DSSHEC-DSS(dss utilities)(dss utilities)
DSS-Vue (Python)DSS-Vue (Python)Updated HEC-RASUpdated HEC-RASFlow and Plan filesFlow and Plan files
HEC-RAS HEC-RAS Model RunModel Run
(PC)(PC)
DSS-Vue DSS-Vue (Python)(Python)
Writes TS Writes TS back to NWSRFSback to NWSRFS
Data FlowData Flow
NWS ForecastNWS Forecast
Pearl River ModelsPearl River Models
Upstream boundary:Upstream boundary:
Discharge from Ross Barnett Dam,Discharge from Ross Barnett Dam,
Jackson, MSJackson, MS
Lateral inflows:Lateral inflows:
JHMM6 - Hanging Moss CreekJHMM6 - Hanging Moss Creek
DLAM6 - Strong River at D’LoDLAM6 - Strong River at D’Lo
OVWM6 – Whitesand Creek at OVWM6 – Whitesand Creek at OakvaleOakvale
Local flows:Local flows:
JACM6, ROCM6, MTCM6 and CLMM6JACM6, ROCM6, MTCM6 and CLMM6
Downstream boundary:Downstream boundary:
Stage at CLMM6Stage at CLMM6
• NWSRFS hydrologic modelNWSRFS hydrologic model• FLDWAVFLDWAV• HEC-RASHEC-RAS
HEC-RAS GeometryHEC-RAS GeometryPearl River BasinPearl River Basin
Geometry for both FLDWAV and Geometry for both FLDWAV and HEC-RAS models are identical.HEC-RAS models are identical.
Geometry data provided to LMRFC courtesyGeometry data provided to LMRFC courtesyof the Vicksburg District USACEof the Vicksburg District USACE
HEC-RAS/FLDWAV HEC-RAS/FLDWAV ComparisonComparison
Pearl River February-March 2003 Flood
235.00
240.00
245.00
250.00
255.00
260.00
265.00
270.00
275.00
01/19/03 01/29/03 02/08/03 02/18/03 02/28/03 03/10/03 03/20/03 03/30/03 04/09/03
Date
Sta
ge
ft
(MS
L)
JACM6 Observed
HEC-Sim
FLDWV-Sim
Vermilion River ModelsVermilion River Models
Upstream boundary:Upstream boundary:Stage at BVCL1 Bayou Carencro Stage at BVCL1 Bayou Carencro
Local flows:Local flows:VRLL1, VLSL1, VSHL1, andVRLL1, VLSL1, VSHL1, andVRPL1VRPL1
Downstream boundary:Downstream boundary:Tide gage at VCPL1 at CypremortTide gage at VCPL1 at CypremortPoint in Vermilion BayPoint in Vermilion Bay
• NWSRFS hydrologic modelNWSRFS hydrologic model• FLDWAVFLDWAV• HEC-RASHEC-RAS
HEC-RAS GeometryHEC-RAS GeometryVermilion River BasinVermilion River Basin
HEC-RAS - geometry uses levees HEC-RAS - geometry uses levees with storage areas.with storage areas.
FLDWAV – levee option does not FLDWAV – levee option does not work in OFS, used “cave-in-bank” work in OFS, used “cave-in-bank” method to account for storage method to account for storage area represented in HEC area represented in HEC geometry.geometry.
This area is in coastal LA is very flat, This area is in coastal LA is very flat, tidally influenced and subject to storm surge.tidally influenced and subject to storm surge.
VLSL1 Gage
Geometry data provided to LMRFC courtesyGeometry data provided to LMRFC courtesyof the New Orleans District USACEof the New Orleans District USACE
HEC-RAS/FLDWAV ComparisonHEC-RAS/FLDWAV Comparison
Vermilion River TS Allison Flood June 2001
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
05/29/2001 06/03/2001 06/08/2001 06/13/2001 06/18/2001 06/23/2001 06/28/2001 07/03/2001
Date/Time
Sta
ge
VLSL1 Observed
VLSL1 HEC-Sim
VLSL1 FLDWAV-Sim
Lower Ohio/Upper MissLower Ohio/Upper MissJunction ModelsJunction Models
Upstream boundaries:Upstream boundaries:CHSI2, SMLI2, BARK2 and KYDK2CHSI2, SMLI2, BARK2 and KYDK2observed/projected flowobserved/projected flow
Local flows:Local flows:CPGM7, PAHK2, CIRI2,CPGM7, PAHK2, CIRI2,WKLK2, NMDM7, OBOT1 and WKLK2, NMDM7, OBOT1 and MEMT1MEMT1
Downstream boundary:Downstream boundary:Normal depthNormal depth
• DWOPERDWOPER• FLDWAV (In-The-Works)FLDWAV (In-The-Works)• HEC-RASHEC-RAS
HEC-RAS GeometryHEC-RAS GeometryLower Ohio/Upper Miss JunctionLower Ohio/Upper Miss Junction
Geometry data provided to LMRFC courtesyGeometry data provided to LMRFC courtesyof the Louisville District USACEof the Louisville District USACE
Geometry for both DWOPER and Geometry for both DWOPER and HEC-RAS models are identical.HEC-RAS models are identical.
Runs as “Proof of Concept” and is Runs as “Proof of Concept” and is not calibrated or used not calibrated or used operationally.operationally.
DWOPER is the current DWOPER is the current operational model at the LMRFCoperational model at the LMRFC
Pascagoula River Pascagoula River ModelModel
Under DevelopmentUnder Development• NWSRFS hydrologic modelNWSRFS hydrologic model• FLDWAVFLDWAV• HEC-RASHEC-RAS
Upstream boundaries:Upstream boundaries:WGAM6, MRRM6, AGRM6, BCDA1,WGAM6, MRRM6, AGRM6, BCDA1,VESM6VESM6
Local flows:Local flows:PGFM6, ORAM6 from NWSRFSPGFM6, ORAM6 from NWSRFS
Downstream boundary:Downstream boundary:Tide gageTide gage
QuestionsQuestions