+ All Categories
Home > Documents > David Weisbrot, Ph.D “Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality...

David Weisbrot, Ph.D “Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality...

Date post: 31-May-2018
Category:
Upload: idenshijp
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 18

Transcript
  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    1/18

    Beyond Medicine:

    The Role and Limitation of LegalRegulation for the Development of

    Quality Genetic Testing Services

    Prof David Weisbrot, ALRC President

    Kitasato International Symposium 2008

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    2/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 20082

    ALRC-NHMRC joint inquiry

    In relation to human genetic information and the samples from which this isderived how can we best:

    protect privacy interests

    protect against unfairdiscrimination

    ensure the highest ethical standards

    Emphasis on public engagement

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    3/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 20083

    Application to many contexts

    Medical/scientificresearch

    Clinical genetics

    Systemic healthcare issues

    Human geneticdatabases, tissuebanks, registers

    Employment Insurance

    Forensics

    Kinship and Identity

    (immigration;parentage; ethnicity/Aboriginality?)

    Other right, services(eg education, aged

    care, sports)

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    4/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 20084

    Final Report ALRC 96 (2003)

    144 recommendations directed at 31 bodies,including the NHMRC

    Dr Francis Collins,NHGRI/NIH: a trulyphenomenal job placingAustralia ahead of whatthe rest of the world isdoing.

    Whole-of-Governmentresponse on9 Dec 05

    accepted almostallrecommendations

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    5/18

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    6/18

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    7/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 20087

    GATTACA

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    8/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 20088

    The policy approach

    Not every problem requires Big Law: successfully fulfilling this brief not only

    involves providing adequate protections

    against the unlawfuluse of genetic

    information, but also putting into place

    measures to ensure that where such

    information may be used lawfully, it is

    used properly, fairly and intelligently

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    9/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 20089

    The regulatory approach

    Use a sophisticated mix of strategies:

    legislation and regulations official standards and codes of practice

    eg NHMRC and Privacy Commissioners officalGuidelines, laboratory accreditation standards

    industry codes and best practice standards insurance industrys policy on genetic testing

    education and training community, med schools, continuing/specialist ed

    peer review

    funding incentives/disincentives better coordination of governmental programs

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    10/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 200810

    Key legalrecommendations

    Some legal changes required To protect/preserve inherent rights and interests

    So important health choices notdriven by collateralmatters (Doctor, I cant take that genetic test because Imworried it may affect my insurance)

    Address anti-discrimination concerns Amend law expressly to cover unlawful discrimination

    based on (real or perceived) genetic status

    employment, insurance, immigration, OH&S laws

    Adapt privacy laws sensitive personal information requires strong protection

    but also shared information (familial dimension) extend law beyond data to cover geneticsamples

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    11/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 200811

    Delivering quality genetic services

    Preparing for when all medicine will begenetic medicine requires a collaborative,coordinated effort:

    Health Departments, hospital administrators

    Clinical geneticists (and researchers)

    GPs (and other specialist doctors) diagnosis (gatekeeping); patient management

    Genetic counsellors (or Google?!) expert at communicating risk and options

    Genetic support groups

    Human Genetics Advisory Committee

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    12/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 200812

    Regulating access to testing

    DNA testing/analysis only by fully-accredited laboratories

    no Medicare payments otherwise

    no evidentiary value otherwise (eg paternity tests)

    Identifysensitive genetic tests

    requiring restricted access, consent

    regimes or counselling analogy with approach to restricted HIV-AIDS testing

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    13/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 200813

    Regulating illicittesting?

    Decreased cost, increased availability,direct marketing, financial incentives

    encourage illicit testing eg, by parents, employers, insurers, investigators, media etc

    Recommend creating a new criminal

    offence:submitting another persons

    DNA for testing without consent or other

    lawful authority (eg court order, statute)

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    14/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 200814

    Regulating consumer curiosity?

    Directly-marketed DIY lifestyle test kits CEO of Sciona, You and Your Genes:already a lot of information out there recommending, forinstance, a diet high in fruit, broccoli and grains Consumers find this advice daunting, as they are not sure towhat extent it pertains to them as individuals.

    Nutrigenomics has now begat dermagenetics (the 5wrinkle genes); sporting genes; ancestry; paternity

    Empowering? Worth worrying about? Regulation? Education? Buyer beware?

    (recreational genomics; feng shui genomics)

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    15/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 200815

    www.rejuvenationplus.com/

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    16/18

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    17/18

    Kitasato International Symposium

    16 March 200817

    Lessons/conclusions

    Sensitive regulation needed to facilitate

    advances in genetic research and thedevelopment of quality clinical genetic services reassure public about ethics, autonomy, legal protections,

    quality and integrity of system

    over-regulation stifle innovation

    under-(or poorly targeted-) regulation risk horrorstories that cause panic regulatory over-reaction

    Maintaining public support (and legitimacy) forgenetic medicine requires openness,transparency and honest public debate.Once trust is lost, it isvery difficult to regain.

  • 8/14/2019 David Weisbrot, Ph.D Role and Limitation of Legal Regulation for the Development of Quality Genetic Testing Services

    18/18


Recommended