Home >Documents >Debate Prep: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

Debate Prep: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

Date post:23-Feb-2016
Category:
View:48 times
Download:0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Debate Prep: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. 2013-2014 Constitutional Law Debate One. What is Success?. What it comes down to…. Define empathy…. em·pa·thy (ˈ empəTHē /) Noun 1 .the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. Deadlines/Prep Points. Case Briefs and Answers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript:

Debate Prep: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

2013-2014Constitutional Law Debate OneDebate Prep:AFFIRMATIVE ACTION1What is Success?

What it comes down to

Define empathyempathy(empTH/)Noun

1.the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.

4Deadlines/Prep PointsCase Briefs and AnswersDUE Next Tuesday (10/1) by 11:59 PMUSE manual templates as a worksheetTYPE questions and answers, TYPE case briefs No prep points assignedWill receive up to two fall points if not completed up to standards2 Fall Points if not completed1 Fall Point if completed or not completed up to standards

Deadlines/Prep Points ContdFIRST DRAFTDUE Tuesday, 10/15/13 by 11:59 PMFOLLOW examples and specs in manual for formattinge.g. Font, Spacing, HeadingsWill NOT receive full prep points if not properly followedEARN up to two prep pointsFINAL DRAFTDUE Tuesday, 10/22/13 by 11:59 PM (one week turn-around)FOLLOW examples and specs in manual for formattinge.g. Font, Spacing, HeadingsWill NOT receive full prep points if not properly followedEARN up to FOUR prep pointsDeadlines/Prep Points ContinuedDEBATE COACHING DUE Friday, 10/25 by 11:59 PMRequired one sessionEarn up to two prep pointsWill follow up with times to meet with debate coachesMENTOR RECEIPTSDUE Friday, 10/25 by 11:59 PMRequired two meetings during cycleEarn up to four prep points2 meetings = 4 points1 meeting = 2 pointsOn to TEXABAMA!!

EQUAL PROTECTION

Three (3) Considerations

Start by asking

C R E A C

CrosonMain PointsRace = Suspect Class Strict ScrutinyRemedial = Compelling Interest, but must show evidenceMust be able to determine whether best-fit to accomplish specific objectiveNote about local and state laws

AdarandMain PointsRemedial = Compelling Interest(Note Croson holding summarized)Again strict scrutiny, but first time applies it to federal law, not state or local law

GrutterMain PointsDiversity in higher education = compelling interestMust be narrowly tailored (approach to achieve interest is best fit)Race can be one plus factor, but must be considered in conjunction with entire individual, cannot be preference solely based on race

Seattle School DistrictMain PointsInvolves diversity in grade schoolDifferent from Grutter Means not narrowly tailoredHere, racial balance the school districts seek is a defined range set solely by reference to the demographics of the respective school districts.racial balance is not to be achieved for its own sake. (p. 33)

HopwoodID PointersSummarize Facts/CircumstancesMain PointsCase is a good example of the necessity at times for remedial actionLook at data and parts that are relied on by court in justifying remedying past discrimination

Ms. [email protected](973) 297-1555 (After School House)(908) 591-4670 (Cell)

Popular Tags:

Click here to load reader

Reader Image
Embed Size (px)
Recommended