Date post: | 04-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | shane-carter |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 37
7/29/2019 Dec Making
1/37
1
Principles of ManagementFundamentals of Decision Making
Professor Bowon Kim
KAIST Graduate School of Management
7/29/2019 Dec Making
2/37
2
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
Define decision making
Explain the conditions of certainty, risk, and uncertainty under
which decisions are made
Describe a framework for understanding routine, adaptive, and
innovative decisions
Explain how goals affect decision making
Describe the rational, bounded rationality, and political models of
decision making
7/29/2019 Dec Making
3/37
3
Define Decision Making
What is Decision Making?
The Decision Making Process
define the problem
identify and assess alternatives
choose a course of action
7/29/2019 Dec Making
4/37
4
Steps in the Decision Making Process
Define the
problem
Gather
information
Identify
and assessalternatives
Choose a
course of
action
7/29/2019 Dec Making
5/37
5
Define Decision Making
What is Decision Making?
Systematic Decisions are Based On the nature of the problem possible available the degree of involved
managers rely on all six managerial competencies to make
decisions
7/29/2019 Dec Making
6/37
6
Conditions of Certainty, Risk, and Uncertainty
Decision Making Conditions
Reflect Uncontrollable Environmental Forces made under conditions of certainty, risk, and
uncertainty
7/29/2019 Dec Making
7/377
Conditions Under Which Decisions Are Made
Certainty Uncertainty
Objective probabilities Subjective probabilities
Risk
7/29/2019 Dec Making
8/378
Conditions of Certainty, Risk, and Uncertainty
Certainty
Full Information the condition under which individuals are fully
informed about a problem, alternatives are obvious, andthe likely results of each choice are clear
is the exception for top and middle managers, but more
common at the supervisory management level
7/29/2019 Dec Making
9/379
Conditions of Certainty, Risk, and Uncertainty
Risk
Determining
the condition under which individuals can define a
problem, specify the probability of certain events,identify alternative solutions, and state the probability
of each alternative leading to a desired outcome
probability is the percentage of times a specific
outcome would occur if the decision were made
numerous times
type, amount, and reliability of information influence
the level of risk
7/29/2019 Dec Making
10/3710
Conditions of Certainty, Risk, and Uncertainty
Risk
Probability
the likelihood that a specific outcome will occur, based
on facts and numbers often based on archival data,historical company and industry events and trends
Probability
the likelihood that a specific outcome will occur, based
on personal judgments and beliefs based on intuition,previous experience, expertise, and personality
7/29/2019 Dec Making
11/3711
Conditions of Certainty, Risk, and Uncertainty
Uncertainty
the condition under which individuals do not have the
information needed to assign probabilities to outcomesof alternative solutions
individual may not even be able to identify the problem common in areas such as R&D, market research, and
strategic planning
7/29/2019 Dec Making
12/3712
Framework for Decision Making
Known and
well defined
Unusual
and
ambiguous
Innovative decisions
Adaptivedecisions
Routine
decisions
Risk
Uncertainty
Certainty
Untried and
ambiguous
7/29/2019 Dec Making
13/3713
Framework for Understanding Routine, Adaptive, and Innovative
Decisions
Types of Problems
Relatively Common
Unusual/Ambiguous
7/29/2019 Dec Making
14/37
14
Framework for Understanding Routine, Adaptive, and Innovative
Decisions
Types of Solutions
Relatively Common and Well Defined
Untried and Ambiguous
7/29/2019 Dec Making
15/37
15
Framework for Understanding Routine, Adaptive, and Innovative
Decisions
Routine Decisions
made in response to well-defined and common
problems and alternative solutions
often available in established rules, standard operating
procedures, or computer software employees may be tempted to make routine decisions in
situations that actually call for adaptive or innovativedecision making
7/29/2019 Dec Making
16/37
16
Framework for Understanding Routine, Adaptive, and Innovative
Decisions
Adaptive Decisions
Response to
combinations of moderately unusual and fairly
uncommon problems and alternative solutions
Involve
modifying and improving upon and practices
a process known as continuous improvement
continuous improvement is a steady stream of small incrementalimprovements made in functional areas of the organization
7/29/2019 Dec Making
17/37
17
Benefits of Continuous Improvement
1) Enhanced customer value through new
and improved products and services
2) Reduction in errors, defects, and waste
3) Increased responsiveness changes in customer
expectations
4) Increased productivity and effectiveness
in the use of resources
7/29/2019 Dec Making
18/37
18
Framework for Understanding Routine, Adaptive, and Innovative
Decisions
Innovative Decisions Based on
discovery, identification, and diagnosis of unusual andambiguous problems and/or development of unique orcreative alternative solutions
information Involve
a series of small, interrelated decisions made overmonths or years
Dont usually happen in a logical, orderly sequence
a sharp break from
7/29/2019 Dec Making
19/37
19
How Goals Affect Decision Making
Linked With Organizational Goals
a search for better ways to achieve established goals an effort to discover new goals, revise current goals, or
drop outdated goals
7/29/2019 Dec Making
20/37
20
How Goals Affect Decision Making
The Nature of Goals Goals are Results
organizational aims
Goals Specify Desired Outcomes
quantitative qualitative
are relatively stable
require constant monitoring and modification
7/29/2019 Dec Making
21/37
21
How Goals Affect Decision Making
Why People Set Goals
Organizational Purposes to focus individual and organizational decisions and
efforts
to facilitate the planning process to to facilitate performance evaluation and control
7/29/2019 Dec Making
22/37
22
How Goals Affect Decision Making
General and Operational Goals
General Goals
provide broad direction for decision making in
qualitative terms
state in quantitative terms
what is to be achieved for whom within what time period
7/29/2019 Dec Making
23/37
23
How Goals Affect Decision Making
Role of Stakeholders Demands
are expressed desires of stakeholders regarding organizational
decisions and goals
limit the types of goals set, decisions made, and actions taken two of the most important are laws and ethics
are the set of goals and alternatives organizations and individualshave to choose from
the range of choices depends partially on the magnitude of
stakeholder power
7/29/2019 Dec Making
24/37
24
Stakeholders, Alternatives, and Goals
Power of
Stakeholders
Choice among
organizational
alternatives
and goals
Constraints
Demands
create influence
7/29/2019 Dec Making
25/37
25
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Rational Model
Seven Step Process
increases the likelihood of logical and sound decision
making
permits the maximum achievement of goals within the
limitations of the situation
7/29/2019 Dec Making
26/37
26
2. Set goals 3. Search for
alternative
solutions
Rational Decision-Making Model
1. Define the
issue
4. Compare and
evaluate
alternative
solutions
5. Choose among
alternative
solutions
6. Implement the
solution
selected
7. Follow up and
control
External and internal
environment forces
7/29/2019 Dec Making
27/37
27
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Rational Model Step 1: Define and Diagnose the Problem
using three basic skills
identifying and monitoring numerous external and internalenvironmental forces and deciding which ones are contributing to theproblem
assessing the environmental forces and determining which are causes
and which are symptoms
relating interpretations to current or desired goals Step 2: Set Goals Step 3: Search for
may involve seeking additional information, thinking creatively,
consulting experts, undertaking research, and similar actions
7/29/2019 Dec Making
28/37
28
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Rational Model Step 4: Alternative Solutions
anticipate expected results and determine the relativecost of each alternative
Step 5: Choose Among Alternative Solutions Step 6: the Solution Selected
a well chosen solution must also be accepted andsupported in order to be well implemented
Step 7: and Control
when implementation doesnt produce desired resultscorrective action is needed
7/29/2019 Dec Making
29/37
29
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Bounded Rationality Model Developed by Herbert Simon
management scholar, in the 1950's Simon won the 1978 Nobel Prize in economics for his research
into the decision making process Refers to
an individual's tendencies to select less than the best goal or
alternative solution
to engage in for alternative solutions to have and control over external and internal environmental
forces influencing the outcomes of decisions
7/29/2019 Dec Making
30/37
30
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Bounded Rationality Model
Satisficing
accepting an acceptable (rather than optimal) goal or
alternative solution may be easier to identify and achieve, less controversial, or
otherwise safer
factors that result in a satisficing decision
a limited
information
7/29/2019 Dec Making
31/37
31
Factors Influencing a Satisficing Decision
Satisficing decision
Limited
search
Informationprocessing
bias
Inadequate
information
7/29/2019 Dec Making
32/37
32
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Bounded Rationality Model
individuals stop searching for alternatives as soon as
they find an acceptable one
Inadequate or Misinterpreted Information
7/29/2019 Dec Making
33/37
33
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Bounded Rationality Model Information Processing Biases
individuals are often affected by information processing biases when theyengage in bounded rationality decision making
availability bias people who easily recall specific instances of an event (due to personal familiarity
with that event) may overestimate how frequently (in general) the event occurs
what people expect to find is often what they do find people seek information consistent with their own views and downplay
conflicting information concrete information bias
vivid, direct experience usually prevails over abstract information
people may view a few incidents as representative of a larger population
seeing an unexpected number of similar events in a row can lead people to
believe that a dissimilar event is more likely to occur next
7/29/2019 Dec Making
34/37
34
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Political Model Power of
describes the decision making process in terms of the particular
interests and goals of powerful external and internal stakeholders powerful refers to the ability to control or influence decisions and
goals
7/29/2019 Dec Making
35/37
35
Factors Affecting Political Decision-Making Processes
Stakeholders
Choice of goals
Alternative solutions
Political
decision
making
7/29/2019 Dec Making
36/37
36
Rational, Bounded Rationality, and Political Models
Political Model Problem Definition
external and internal stake holders try to define problems to their ownadvantage
stakeholders may use scapegoating to cast blame on another party for
problems, hoping to preserve a position of power or a positive image
reflect the agendas of the organization's most powerful stakeholders coalitions(alliances)
formed when no one person or group has sufficient power to select orimplement its preferred goal
Search for Alternative Solutions constrained or expanded
depending upon whether more or less information is conducive to stakeholdersagendas
bringing in a new stakeholder representative to increase the number ofalternative solutions
7/29/2019 Dec Making
37/37
Did You Make an Ethical Decision? (examples)
Highly Highly
Ethical Ethical Gray Area Unethical Unethical
Taking a box
of paper clips
home
Using a copy
machine for
personal use
Using e-mail
for personal
messages