December 2012 - NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services...programming (80%) chemical dependency...

County Re-entry Task Force Program Activity Report:

October 2012 – December 2012

Data provided by County Re-entry Task Forces to Division of Criminal Justice Service, Office of Justice Research and Performance as of

May 6, 2013

For the Following Counties: Albany, Bronx, Broome, Dutchess, Erie, Kings, Manhattan, Monroe,

Nassau, Niagara, Oneida, Onondaga, Orange, Rensselaer, Rockland, Schenectady, Suffolk, Ulster, and Westchester

Division of Criminal Justice Services Office of Justice Research and Performance

This report includes information on CRTF activity during October 2012-December 2012, which includes information on Track I clients, the higher-risk prison releases served by the CRTFs.

This project was supported by Grant No. 2011-BJ-CX-K042 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.

2

CRTF Track I (T1) Admissions, July 2012 – December 2012

There were 868 Track I clients admitted to the CRTFs from October through December of 2012, 69 more clients than in the previous quarter. Overall, the CRTFs met 86% of their Track I intake goal for the quarter.

County Min

Req per Month

Min Req per Quarter

July August September October November December Q1 (Jul-Sep)Q2 (Oct-

Dec)

n %

Goal Met

n %

Goal Met

n %

Goal Met

n %

Goal Met

n %

Goal Met

n %

Goal Met

n %

Goal Met

n %

Goal Met

Albany 20 61 24 118% 26 127% 26 127% 27 132% 24 118% 27 132% 76 124% 78 127%

Bronx* 10 31 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 10% 3 29% 0 0% 4 13%

Broome 11 32 17 161% 16 151% 26 246% 21 198% 12 113% 18 170% 59 186% 51 161%

Dutchess* 5 16 6 114% 11 210% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 17 108% 0 0%

Erie 38 115 18 47% 8 21% 7 18% 12 31% 25 65% 25 65% 33 29% 62 54%

Kings 21 63 18 86% 27 130% 24 115% 41 197% 31 149% 39 187% 69 110% 111 178%

Manhattan 21 63 16 77% 7 34% 4 19% 12 58% 14 67% 16 77% 27 43% 42 67%

Monroe 37 111 10 27% 27 73% 12 33% 20 54% 7 19% 9 24% 49 44% 36 33%

Nassau 17 52 31 180% 20 116% 15 87% 19 110% 11 64% 16 93% 66 128% 46 89%

Niagara 10 31 7 67% 5 48% 11 106% 13 125% 14 134% 13 125% 23 74% 40 128%

Oneida 12 36 12 101% 17 143% 18 151% 17 143% 3 25% 27 227% 47 131% 47 131%

Onondaga 28 85 19 67% 18 64% 18 64% 30 107% 23 82% 20 71% 55 65% 73 86%

Orange 15 44 34 232% 28 191% 12 82% 13 89% 21 143% 17 116% 74 168% 51 116%

Rensselaer 8 25 14 168% 7 84% 12 144% 13 156% 4 48% 6 72% 33 132% 23 92%

Rockland 5 15 9 180% 7 140% 8 160% 9 180% 5 100% 1 20% 24 160% 15 100%

Schenectady 12 37 12 97% 14 114% 14 114% 12 97% 16 130% 12 97% 40 108% 40 108%

Suffolk 38 114 15 40% 12 32% 11 29% 31 82% 35 92% 15 40% 38 33% 81 71%

Ulster 10 31 8 77% 10 96% 4 38% 6 58% 11 106% 9 86% 22 70% 26 83%

Westchester 15 44 17 117% 15 103% 15 103% 15 103% 13 89% 14 96% 47 107% 42 96%

Total 335 1,004 287 86% 275 82% 237 71% 311 93% 270 81% 287 86% 799 80% 868 86%

*Bronx began accepting clients in November 2012 and did not discharge any clients in November or December 2012. Dutchess’ contract was renegotiated to begin October 1, 2012, and clients were first admitted under the new contract in January 2013, resulting in no admissions or discharges from September 2012 to December 2012.

3

CRTF Track I Admissions, October 2012 – December 2012 (cont’d)

24% of Track I clients admitted to the CRTFs were under 25 years old. For county specific Track I client age information, see page 9.

A small proportion (6%) of Track I clients were female. For county specific Track I client sex information, see page 9.

17 years & under5

1%18-24 years

19623%

25-34 years32237%

35-49 years27131%

50+ years748%

Age of Track I Clients: October 2012 - December 2012 Admissions

n=868

Male80893%

Female516%

Unknown9

1%

Sex of Track I Clients: October 2012 - December 2012 Admissions

n=868n=868

4


Nearly all (97%) Track I clients were moderate to high risk offenders (87%) or sex offenders (10%). For county-level Track I population information, see page 10.

Nearly all (97%) of Track I clients were on parole when admitted to the CRTFs. County-level information can be found on page 12.

Of Track I admissions on parole, case conferences were held for 699 (81%). County-level information can be found on page 12.

Moderate to High Risk75187%

Woman with High Need 2%

Max Expiration <1%

Sex Offender 10%

Juvenile < 1%Impairments/ severe medical

<1%

Other11713%

Track I Population Composition: October 2012 - December 2012 Admissions

n=868

On Parole84697%

Max Exp223%

Supervision Status of Track I Clients: October 2012 - December 2012 Admissions

n=868

5


The needs that were most commonly identified by the CRTFs for Track I clients were employment programming (80%) chemical dependency treatment (79%), and social services assistance (78%). See pages 13-14 for additional county specific information.

CRTF Track I Discharges, October 2012 – December 2012

Of the 711 clients discharged between October 2012 and December 2012, 445 (63%) clients successfully completed CRTF programs. 151 (21%) clients were discharged by CRTFs due to a new arrest or parole violation (as reported by the CRTFs). County-level data can be found on page 15.

80% 79% 78%72%

56%49%

35% 35% 35%

25%

10%3%

Identified Service Needs of Track I Clients: October 2012 -December 2012 Admissions

Successful Completion

44563%

Voluntarily Discontinued

9714%

New Arrest/Violation

15121%

Other Reasons182%

Discharge Reasons for Track I Clients: October 2012 - December 2012 Discharges

n=711

6

CRTF Track I Discharges, October 2012 – December 2012 (cont’d)

615 (86%) clients spent at least 45 days in the CRTFs, with 470 (66%) enrolled more than 90 days. See page 22 for county specific information.

208 (29%) of clients discharged from the CRTFs were employed while in the CRTFs, with an additional 44 (6%) reported as unemployable. County-level employment data is available on page 21.

<45 days96

14%

45-89 days14520%

90+ days47066%

Days Spent in the CRTF by Track I Clients: October 2012 - December 2012 Discharges

n=711

Not Employed45965%

Unemployable6%

Employed P/T14%

Employed F/T15%

Employed/ Unemployable

25235%

Employment Status of Track I Clients: October 2012 - December 2012 Discharges

n=711

7

Program Participation among Track I Discharges*, October 2012 – December 2012

County specific data regarding program participation is located on pages 16-19.

592 clients discharged during this time had a need for social services assistance assessed at intake. Of these, 504 (85%) had obtained social services assistance prior to discharge.

479 clients discharged during this time period had a need for housing assistance assessed at intake. Of these, 284 (59%) were in a private residence at discharge.

The following chart shows the proportion of clients who either successfully completed or were still engaged in a program at discharge for the other identified needs.

0% 0% 7%

18% 19%

0%

16%11%

2% 2% 5%

56% 53%44% 25% 21%

39%

22%

20%

18% 18% 13%

MH TxProg

Vets Prog ChemDep Prog

AngerMgt

Cog BehInt

Sex OffTx Prog

EmployProg

Off AcctProg

Ed/VocProg

FamilySuppProg

MentoringProg

Percentage of Clients with Assessed Need Who Successfully Completed or Were Currently Engaged in Programs

Successfully Completed Currently Engaged56%

53%51%

43%

40% 38%

31%

20% 20% 18%

39%

*For clients who were discharged due to a new arrest or parole violation, program participation status reported by the CRTF is prior to the client’s arrest/violation.

8

Service Gaps, October 2012 – December 2012

In addition to information on housing and social service utilization, needs assessment information is reported for 11 program areas. For each program area, the CRTFs record whether an assessment is conducted as well as the outcome of the assessment. The majority of Track I clients were assessed for all needs areas. Data by county is on pages 13-14.

The following chart shows the proportion of clients who did not have their need met while engaged in the CRTF because an appropriate program does not exist in that county or the client was placed on a waiting list.

The needs areas with the largest proportion of Track I clients who did not get their need met due to lack of an appropriate program were mentoring (34% of clients with an assessed need) and family support (20%). See pages 16-19 for county specific information.

Needs areas with the largest proportion of Track I clients still waiting for a program at discharge were sex offender treatment (19% of clients with an assessed need) and educational/vocational programs (9%). See pages 16-19 for county level data.

34%

12%

19% 20%

9%13%

7%3% 0% 2% <1%

1%

19% 7%0%

7% 0%

6%9%

7% 5% 4%

MentoringProg

Sex OffTx Prog

AngerMgt

FamilySupp Prog

Cog BehInt

Vets Prog Off AcctProg

Ed/VocProg

MH TxProg

EmployProg

ChemDep Prog

Percentage of Clients with Need Who Were Not Enrolled in Programs Due to Lack of Program Availability

No Appropriate Program Client on Waiting List35%

31%

26%

20%

16%13% 13% 12%

7%4%

7%

9

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Intakes: Age and Sex

County 17 years & under 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-49 years 50+ years Total

County Male Female Unknown Total

n % n % n % n % n % n n % n % n % n

Albany 2 3% 19 24% 24 31% 25 32% 8 10% 78 Albany 68 87% 8 10% 2 3% 78

Bronx 0 0% 0 0% 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 Bronx 4 100% 0 0% 0 0% 4

Broome 0 0% 5 10% 25 49% 16 31% 5 10% 51 Broome 45 88% 4 8% 2 4% 51

Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Erie 0 0% 15 24% 19 31% 22 35% 6 10% 62 Erie 60 97% 2 3% 0 0% 62

Kings 0 0% 23 21% 44 40% 38 34% 6 5% 111 Kings 109 98% 2 2% 0 0% 111

Manhattan 0 0% 16 38% 11 26% 12 29% 3 7% 42 Manhattan 42 100% 0 0% 0 0% 42

Monroe 0 0% 5 14% 15 42% 11 31% 5 14% 36 Monroe 34 94% 0 0% 2 6% 36

Nassau 0 0% 22 48% 14 30% 7 15% 3 7% 46 Nassau 41 89% 5 11% 0 0% 46

Niagara 0 0% 11 28% 17 43% 11 28% 1 3% 40 Niagara 38 95% 2 5% 0 0% 40

Oneida 0 0% 9 19% 24 51% 13 28% 1 2% 47 Oneida 45 96% 2 4% 0 0% 47

Onondaga 3 4% 22 30% 29 40% 17 23% 2 3% 73 Onondaga 64 88% 6 8% 3 4% 73

Orange 0 0% 7 14% 19 37% 19 37% 6 12% 51 Orange 48 94% 3 6% 0 0% 51

Rensselaer 0 0% 2 9% 7 30% 11 48% 3 13% 23 Rensselaer 22 96% 1 4% 0 0% 23

Rockland 0 0% 3 20% 8 53% 1 7% 3 20% 15 Rockland 15 100% 0 0% 0 0% 15

Schenectady 0 0% 9 23% 15 38% 13 33% 3 8% 40 Schenectady 38 95% 2 5% 0 0% 40

Suffolk 0 0% 12 15% 27 33% 31 38% 11 14% 81 Suffolk 74 91% 7 9% 0 0% 81

Ulster 0 0% 6 23% 8 31% 9 35% 3 12% 26 Ulster 23 88% 3 12% 0 0% 26

Westchester 0 0% 10 24% 15 36% 13 31% 4 10% 42 Westchester 38 90% 4 10% 0 0% 42

Total 5 1% 196 23% 322 37% 271 31% 74 9% 868 Total 808 93% 51 6% 9 1% 868

10

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Intakes: Population Composition

County Moderate to High Risk

Woman with High Need

Max Expiration

Sex Offender Juvenile Impairments/ severe medical

Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n Albany 62 79% 1 1% 0 0% 13 17% 1 1% 1 1% 78 Bronx 4 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 Broome 41 80% 3 6% 1 2% 5 10% 1 2% 0 0% 51 Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Erie 51 82% 1 2% 0 0% 10 16% 0 0% 0 0% 62 Kings 111 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 111 Manhattan 41 98% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 42 Monroe 35 97% 0 0% 1 3% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 36 Nassau 43 93% 3 7% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 46 Niagara 30 75% 1 3% 0 0% 9 23% 0 0% 0 0% 40 Oneida 34 72% 0 0% 0 0% 13 28% 0 0% 0 0% 47 Onondaga 68 93% 3 4% 0 0% 0 0% 2 3% 0 0% 73 Orange 41 80% 0 0% 0 0% 10 20% 0 0% 0 0% 51 Rensselaer 18 78% 0 0% 0 0% 5 22% 0 0% 0 0% 23 Rockland 15 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 15 Schenectady 32 80% 1 3% 0 0% 6 15% 0 0% 1 3% 40 Suffolk 62 77% 4 5% 0 0% 15 19% 0 0% 0 0% 81 Ulster 25 96% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 4% 26 Westchester 38 90% 3 7% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 42 Total 751 87% 20 2% 2 0% 87 10% 4 0% 4 0% 868

11

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Intakes: Time between DOCCS Release and CRTF Intake

County 7 days or less 8-30 days 31-60 days 61-90 days 91-365 days More than 365 days Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n

Albany 66 85% 12 15% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 78

Bronx 4 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4

Broome 21 41% 25 49% 3 6% 0 0% 2 4% 0 0% 51

Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Erie 27 44% 22 35% 7 11% 3 5% 3 5% 0 0% 62

Kings 4 4% 41 37% 18 16% 8 7% 27 24% 13 12% 111

Manhattan 14 33% 11 26% 4 10% 1 2% 6 14% 6 14% 42

Monroe 6 17% 12 33% 5 14% 3 8% 9 25% 1 3% 36

Nassau 42 91% 4 9% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 46

Niagara 27 68% 5 13% 4 10% 1 3% 2 5% 1 3% 40

Oneida 30 64% 10 21% 5 11% 1 2% 1 2% 0 0% 47

Onondaga 69 95% 2 3% 0 0% 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% 73

Orange 45 88% 2 4% 3 6% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 51

Rensselaer 22 96% 1 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 23

Rockland 6 40% 8 53% 0 0% 1 7% 0 0% 0 0% 15

Schenectady 31 78% 3 8% 3 8% 0 0% 2 5% 1 3% 40

Suffolk 27 33% 27 33% 9 11% 3 4% 9 11% 6 7% 81

Ulster 7 27% 14 54% 1 4% 3 12% 1 4% 0 0% 26

Westchester 8 19% 22 52% 8 19% 2 5% 2 5% 0 0% 42 Total 456 53% 221 25% 70 8% 28 3% 64 7% 29 3% 868

12

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Intakes: Supervision Status and Case Conference Status

County On Parole, Case Conf

On Parole, No Case Conf

Not on Parole, Case Conf

Not on Parole, No Case Conf

Total County

On Parole Max Exp Other Total

n % n % n % n % n n % n % n % n

Albany 68 87% 1 1% 9 12% 0 0% 78 Albany 69 88% 9 12% 0 0% 78

Bronx 3 75% 1 25% 0 0% 0 0% 4 Bronx 4 100% 0 0% 0 0% 4

Broome 49 96% 0 0% 2 4% 0 0% 51 Broome 49 96% 2 4% 0 0% 51

Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Erie 61 98% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 62 Erie 62 100% 0 0% 0 0% 62

Kings 111 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 111 Kings 111 100% 0 0% 0 0% 111

Manhattan 24 57% 18 43% 0 0% 0 0% 42 New York 42 100% 0 0% 0 0% 42

Monroe 0 0% 32 89% 0 0% 4 11% 36 Monroe 32 89% 4 11% 0 0% 36

Nassau 44 96% 2 4% 0 0% 0 0% 46 Nassau 46 100% 0 0% 0 0% 46

Niagara 39 98% 0 0% 0 0% 1 3% 40 Niagara 39 98% 1 3% 0 0% 40

Oneida 36 77% 10 21% 0 0% 1 2% 47 Oneida 46 98% 1 2% 0 0% 47

Onondaga 73 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 73 Onondaga 73 100% 0 0% 0 0% 73

Orange 17 33% 33 65% 1 2% 0 0% 51 Orange 50 98% 1 2% 0 0% 51

Rensselaer 23 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 23 Rensselaer 23 100% 0 0% 0 0% 23

Rockland 15 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 15 Rockland 15 100% 0 0% 0 0% 15

Schenectady 36 90% 1 3% 3 8% 0 0% 40 Schenectady 37 93% 3 8% 0 0% 40

Suffolk 32 40% 48 59% 0 0% 1 1% 81 Suffolk 80 99% 1 1% 0 0% 81

Ulster 26 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 26 Ulster 26 100% 0 0% 0 0% 26

Westchester 42 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 42 Westchester 42 100% 0 0% 0 0% 42

Total 699 81% 147 17% 15 2% 7 1% 868 Total 846 97% 22 3% 0 0% 868

13

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Intakes: Service Needs

County Total

Albany Bronx Broome Dutch-ess Erie Kings Man-

hattan Monroe Nassau Niagara Oneida Onon- daga Orange Renss-

elaer Rock-land

Schen-ectady Suffolk Ulster West-

chester n %

Hou

sin

g Need 42 4 26 N/A 46 13 11 24 20 32 28 39 36 5 5 21 36 13 14 415 49% No need 36 0 25 N/A 16 98 23 12 26 8 19 33 4 18 10 19 28 13 28 416 49%

Not Assessed 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 2 0 0 22 3%

Em

plo

y

Need 71 4 33 N/A 42 96 34 18 46 39 40 56 22 18 9 38 49 23 41 679 80% No need 6 0 18 N/A 20 15 7 18 0 1 7 10 5 5 3 2 10 3 1 131 15%

Not Assessed 1 0 0 N/A 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 24 0 3 0 7 0 0 43 5%

Ed

/ V

oc Need 12 3 19 N/A 43 110 31 11 46 14 29 44 1 8 5 13 49 22 20 480 56%

No need 65 1 32 N/A 19 1 10 25 0 26 18 21 35 15 9 26 11 4 22 340 40% Not

Assessed 1 0 0 N/A 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 15 0 1 1 6 0 0 33 4%

Soc

Serv

A

ssis

t

Need 73 4 39 N/A 62 37 13 20 46 40 38 65 42 12 14 39 59 18 39 660 78% No need 5 0 12 N/A 0 74 24 16 0 0 9 7 1 11 1 1 6 8 3 178 21%

Not Assessed 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 2%

Ch

em D

ep

Tx

Need 47 4 47 N/A 56 111 23 13 46 36 24 63 17 17 15 34 61 23 40 677 79% No need 31 0 4 N/A 5 0 16 23 0 4 23 10 22 6 0 6 5 3 2 160 19%

Not Assessed 0 0 0 N/A 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2%

Sex

Off

Tx Need 14 0 8 N/A 11 0 0 2 4 8 7 0 8 6 0 6 17 0 0 91 10%

No need 63 4 36 N/A 51 111 39 34 42 32 39 64 39 17 15 34 64 26 42 752 87% Not

Assessed 1 0 7 N/A 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 3%

Off

Acc

t P

rog

Need 16 0 18 N/A 21 3 0 7 46 39 2 35 29 1 6 17 45 17 4 306 35% No need 61 4 33 N/A 41 108 39 29 0 1 45 37 15 18 9 23 30 9 38 540 62%

Not Assessed 1 0 0 N/A 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 7 4 0 0 6 0 0 22 3%

Total 78 4 51 N/A 62 111 42 36 46 40 47 73 51 23 15 40 81 26 42 868

14

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Intakes: Service Needs (cont’d)

County Total


hattan Monroe Nassau Niagara Oneida Onon- daga Orange Renss-

elaer Rock-land

Schen-ectady Suffolk Ulster West-

chester n %

Cog

Beh

In

t Need 61 4 37 N/A 25 111 33 10 46 38 19 34 8 14 7 32 76 25 42 622 72% No need 17 0 14 N/A 36 0 7 26 0 2 28 37 28 9 0 8 4 1 0 217 25%

Not Assessed 0 0 0 N/A 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 15 0 8 0 1 0 0 29 3%

Men

tor

Need 33 1 21 N/A 3 6 1 0 46 33 0 7 1 21 3 35 26 23 41 301 35% No need 45 3 30 N/A 59 105 39 36 0 7 47 65 44 2 10 5 37 3 1 538 62%

Not Assessed 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 2 0 18 0 0 29 3%

An

ger

Mgt

Need 20 0 23 N/A 25 34 27 10 19 6 1 29 9 9 10 7 30 15 30 304 35% No need 57 4 28 N/A 36 77 12 26 26 34 46 43 25 14 5 33 46 11 12 535 62%

Not Assessed 1 0 0 N/A 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 17 0 0 0 5 0 0 29 3%

Men

tal H

ealt

h

Tx

Need 18 3 9 N/A 24 9 3 7 9 10 11 20 9 5 5 16 24 24 8 214 25% No need 58 1 42 N/A 38 102 35 29 37 30 36 51 28 18 10 24 54 2 34 629 72%

Not Assessed 2 0 0 N/A 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 14 0 0 0 3 0 0 25 3%

Fam

Su

pp Need 36 2 27 N/A 26 6 12 11 46 23 1 45 9 10 1 21 22 20 23 341 39%

No need 42 2 24 N/A 36 105 27 25 0 17 45 28 34 13 10 19 55 6 19 507 58% Not

Assessed 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 4 0 4 0 0 20 2%

Vet

s P

rog

Need 0 0 0 N/A 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 2 12 4 0 27 3% No need 78 4 5 N/A 60 111 37 36 46 40 47 71 47 21 15 38 67 22 42 787 91%

Not Assessed 0 0 46 N/A 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 54 6%

Total 78 4 51 N/A 62 111 42 36 46 40 47 73 51 23 15 40 81 26 42 868

15

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Discharges: Discharge Reasons

County Successful Discharge

Voluntarily Discontinued

New Arrest Violation Deceased Transferred to Other

CRTF Area Moved to non-CRTF Area Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n

Albany 61 72% 5 6% 1 1% 16 19% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% 85

Bronx 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0

Broome 67 87% 0 0% 0 0% 10 13% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 77

Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Erie 23 61% 1 3% 1 3% 7 18% 0 0% 1 3% 5 13% 38

Kings 9 13% 57 81% 0 0% 4 6% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 70

Manhattan 4 67% 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 6

Monroe 6 23% 13 50% 0 0% 7 27% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 26

Nassau 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 75% 0 0% 2 25% 0 0% 8

Niagara 5 45% 0 0% 1 9% 4 36% 0 0% 1 9% 0 0% 11

Oneida 55 93% 0 0% 2 3% 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 59

Onondaga 37 60% 1 2% 9 15% 14 23% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 62

Orange 20 39% 8 16% 0 0% 23 45% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 51

Rensselaer 13 54% 0 0% 2 8% 6 25% 1 4% 2 8% 0 0% 24

Rockland 16 76% 0 0% 0 0% 5 24% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 21

Schenectady 31 56% 3 5% 3 5% 16 29% 0 0% 2 4% 0 0% 55

Suffolk 29 78% 4 11% 0 0% 4 11% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 37

Ulster 14 61% 5 22% 0 0% 4 17% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 23

Westchester 55 95% 0 0% 0 0% 3 5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 58

Total 445 63% 97 14% 19 3% 132 19% 2 0% 9 1% 7 1% 711

16

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Discharges: Program Participation Status at CRTF Discharge* County Total


hattan Monr

oe Nassau Nia- gara Oneida Onon-

daga Orange Renss-elaer

Rock-land

Schen-ectady

Suf-folk Ulster West-

chester n %

Hou

sin

g

No Need 27 0 26 N/A 8 65 1 0 0 0 7 22 22 8 0 13 3 0 30 232 33% Halfway House 4 0 2 N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 1 0 0 24 3% Residential Treatment Program 2 0 2 N/A 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 13 2% Parole Resid Stabilization Prog 9 0 3 N/A 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 24 3% Parole Community Based Resid Prog 0 0 2 N/A 14 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 7 31 4% Shelter- Housing Only 5 0 8 N/A 0 1 0 3 0 3 1 7 0 0 1 8 4 1 0 42 6% Shelter that includes ancillary services 0 0 0 N/A 10 3 0 3 3 0 0 7 0 1 1 0 0 2 9 39 5% Hotel/motel 8 0 7 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 22 3% Private Residence 30 0 27 N/A 4 0 4 19 2 7 49 24 12 8 18 24 25 19 12 284 40%

Em

p P

rog

Not Referred, No Need Identified 3 0 53 N/A 17 2 2 19 0 0 3 12 7 10 4 9 5 5 1 152 21% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 0 0 1 N/A 2 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1% Not Referred, Other Reasons 4 0 1 N/A 1 8 1 1 0 1 1 39 34 1 0 14 7 0 9 122 17% Referred, On Waiting List 0 0 2 N/A 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 9 5 1 27 4% Referred, Client Declined Services 8 0 4 N/A 5 15 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 6 2 13 1 3 3 64 9% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 3 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 10 1% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 7 0 0 N/A 4 0 0 2 0 0 6 2 5 0 1 0 0 2 2 31 4% Referred, Currently Engaged 6 0 9 N/A 5 4 0 1 0 4 12 4 3 7 9 10 12 1 38 125 18% Referred, Discharged, Did Not Complete 11 0 0 N/A 2 37 1 2 8 1 8 2 2 0 3 2 1 2 1 83 12% Referred, Discharged, Successful Completion 43 0 7 N/A 0 4 0 1 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 6 2 2 3 88 12%

Ed

/V

oc P

rog


Total 85 0 77 N/A 38 70 6 26 8 11 59 62 51 24 21 55 37 23 58 711

*Program participation status for clients discharged due to a new arrest/violation is their status prior to the arrest/violation.

17

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Discharges: Program Participation Status at CRTF Discharge* (cont’d) County Total


hattan Monroe Nassau Nia- gara Oneida Onon-


Rock-land

Schen-ectady


chester n %

Soc

Serv

Ass

t No Need 6 0 34 N/A 0 10 1 8 0 0 7 13 6 11 4 11 2 4 2 119 17% Referred 3 0 0 N/A 1 3 3 0 0 0 5 11 0 0 1 6 3 1 0 37 5% Applied- Pending 0 0 0 N/A 8 3 0 0 0 0 1 12 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 31 4% Denied - Not Eligible 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 11 2% Denied - DSS Sanction 3 0 0 N/A 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 9 1% Receiving Services 73 0 43 N/A 28 54 2 18 8 11 39 23 42 11 13 37 31 15 56 504 71%

Ch

em D

ep P

rog


Sex

Off

Tx


Off

Acc

t P

rog


Total 85 0 77 N/A 38 70 6 26 8 11 59 62 51 24 21 55 37 23 58 711


18



hattan Monroe Nassau Nia- gara Oneida Onon-


Rock-land

Schen-ectady


chester n %

Cog

Beh

In

t


Men

tori

ng


An

ger

Mgt


Total 85 0 77 N/A 38 70 6 26 8 11 59 62 51 24 21 55 37 23 58 711


19



hattan Monroe Nassau Nia-gara Oneida Onon-


Rock-land

Schen-ectady


chester n %

Men

tal H

ealt

h P

rog

Not Referred, No Need Identified 80 0 68 N/A 20 64 5 22 8 8 44 48 29 16 18 40 35 6 37 548 77% Not Referred, No Appropriate Program 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% Not Referred, Other Reasons 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 17 0 0 7 0 0 0 28 4% Referred, On Waiting List 0 0 0 N/A 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 12 2% Referred, Client Declined Services 0 0 2 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 1 10 1% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0% Referred, Other Non-Admission Reason 0 0 0 N/A 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 7 1% Referred, Currently Engaged 5 0 7 N/A 12 1 1 3 0 1 13 7 4 5 0 5 2 8 18 92 13% Referred, Discharged, Did Not Complete 0 0 0 N/A 2 5 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 13 2%

Referred, Discharged, Successful Completion 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Fam

Su

pp

Pro

g



Vet

eran

s P

rog



Total 85 0 77 N/A 38 70 6 26 8 11 59 62 51 24 21 55 37 23 58 711


20

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Discharges: Program Participation Status at CRTF Discharge: All CRTFs

Employment

Program

Education/ Vocational Program

Chemical Dependency

Program

Sex Offender Tx Program

Offender Accountability

Program

Cog Behavioral

Intervention

Mentoring Program

Anger Management

Mental Health Tx Program

Family Support Program

Veterans Program

n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Total Discharges 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% 711 100% Clients with No Need 152 21% 343 48% 185 26% 644 91% 533 75% 226 32% 443 62% 443 62% 548 77% 460 65% 696 98% Clients with Need 559 79% 368 52% 526 74% 67 9% 178 25% 485 68% 268 38% 268 38% 163 23% 251 35% 15 2% Not Referred, No Appropriate Prog 9 2% 11 3% 1 0% 8 12% 12 7% 43 9% 91 34% 51 19% 0 0% 49 20% 2 13%

Not Referred, Other Reasons 122 22% 83 23% 45 9% 12 18% 57 32% 57 12% 44 16% 38 14% 28 17% 71 28% 1 7% Referred, On Waiting List 27 5% 32 9% 20 4% 13 19% 11 6% 34 7% 4 1% 19 7% 12 7% 0 0% 0 0%

Referred, Client Declined Services 64 11% 104 28% 23 4% 2 3% 12 7% 43 9% 54 20% 10 4% 10 6% 42 17% 1 7% Referred, Client Deemed Ineligible 10 2% 3 1% 35 7% 0 0% 0 0% 5 1% 1 0% 0 0% 1 1% 4 2% 2 13% Referred, Other Non-Adm Reason 31 6% 19 5% 14 3% 4 6% 15 8% 20 4% 8 3% 7 3% 7 4% 9 4% 0 0%

Referred, Currently Engaged 125 22% 66 18% 232 44% 26 39% 36 20% 100 21% 36 13% 68 25% 92 56% 44 18% 8 53% Referred, Did Not Complete 83 15% 41 11% 118 22% 2 3% 16 9% 93 19% 16 6% 28 10% 13 8% 27 11% 1 7%

Referred, Successful Completion 88 16% 9 2% 38 7% 0 0% 19 11% 90 19% 14 5% 47 18% 0 0% 5 2% 0 0% Clients With Need Subtotal 559 100% 368 100% 526 100% 67 100% 178 100% 485 100% 268 100% 268 100% 163 100% 251 100% 15 100%

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Discharges: Program Participation Status Categories Summary

Employment Program

Education/ Vocational Program

Chemical Dependency

Program

Sex Offender Tx Program

Offender Accountability

Program

Cog Behavioral

Intervention

Mentoring Program

Anger Management

Mental Health Tx Program

Family Support Program

Veterans Program

n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

Total Clients with Need 559 100% 368 100% 526 100% 67 100% 178 100% 485 100% 268 100% 268 100% 163 100% 251 100% 15 100% No Appropriate Program 9 2% 11 3% 1 0% 8 12% 12 7% 43 9% 91 34% 51 19% 0 0% 49 20% 2 13% Client on Waiting List 27 5% 32 9% 20 4% 13 19% 11 6% 34 7% 4 1% 19 7% 12 7% 0 0% 0 0% Client Declined Services 64 11% 104 28% 23 4% 2 3% 12 7% 43 9% 54 20% 10 4% 10 6% 42 17% 1 7% Other 163 29% 105 29% 94 18% 16 24% 72 40% 82 17% 53 20% 45 17% 36 22% 84 33% 3 20% Client Was Enrolled 296 53% 116 32% 388 74% 28 42% 71 40% 283 58% 66 25% 143 53% 105 64% 76 30% 9 60%

Successfully Completed 88 30% 9 8% 38 10% 0 0% 19 27% 90 32% 14 21% 47 33% 0 0% 5 7% 0 0% Currently Engaged 125 42% 66 57% 232 60% 26 93% 36 51% 100 35% 36 55% 68 48% 92 88% 44 58% 8 89% Did Not Complete 83 28% 41 35% 118 30% 2 7% 16 23% 93 33% 16 24% 28 20% 13 12% 27 36% 1 11%

Client Was Enrolled Subtotal 296 100% 116 100% 388 100% 28 100% 71 100% 283 100% 66 100% 143 100% 105 100% 76 100% 9 100%

*Other includes Not Referred, Other Reason, Client Deemed Ineligible, and Other Non-Admission Reason. Client Was Enrolled includes Currently Engaged, Failed to Complete, and Successful Completion.

21

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Discharges: Employment Status

County Unemployable Not Employed Employed P/T Employed F/T Total

n % n % n % n % n

Albany 7 8% 20 24% 35 41% 23 27% 85

Bronx 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0

Broome 1 1% 40 52% 17 22% 19 25% 77

Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Erie 4 11% 25 66% 6 16% 3 8% 38

Kings 1 1% 55 79% 3 4% 11 16% 70

Manhattan 2 33% 3 50% 1 17% 0 0% 6

Monroe 0 0% 22 85% 1 4% 3 12% 26

Nassau 0 0% 7 88% 1 13% 0 0% 8

Niagara 0 0% 7 64% 2 18% 2 18% 11

Oneida 11 19% 41 69% 3 5% 4 7% 59

Onondaga 2 3% 54 87% 2 3% 4 6% 62

Orange 0 0% 43 84% 3 6% 5 10% 51

Rensselaer 4 17% 16 67% 0 0% 4 17% 24

Rockland 0 0% 13 62% 3 14% 5 24% 21

Schenectady 2 4% 33 60% 11 20% 9 16% 55

Suffolk 1 3% 27 73% 5 14% 4 11% 37

Ulster 3 13% 17 74% 1 4% 2 9% 23

Westchester 6 10% 36 62% 4 7% 12 21% 58

Total 44 6% 459 65% 98 14% 110 15% 711

22

October 2012 through December 2012 Track I Discharges: Days in CRTF

County <45 days 45-89 days 90+ days Total

n % n % n % n

Albany 0 0% 11 13% 74 87% 85

Bronx 0 - 0 - 0 - 0

Broome 4 5% 13 17% 60 78% 77

Dutchess N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Erie 11 29% 11 29% 16 42% 38

Kings 33 47% 12 17% 25 36% 70

Manhattan 1 17% 1 17% 4 67% 6

Monroe 8 31% 7 27% 11 42% 26

Nassau 0 0% 6 75% 2 25% 8

Niagara 6 55% 0 0% 5 45% 11

Oneida 1 2% 4 7% 54 92% 59

Onondaga 10 16% 11 18% 41 66% 62

Orange 6 12% 12 24% 33 65% 51

Rensselaer 4 17% 14 58% 6 25% 24

Rockland 1 5% 6 29% 14 67% 21

Schenectady 5 9% 12 22% 38 69% 55

Suffolk 4 11% 20 54% 13 35% 37

Ulster 2 9% 2 9% 19 83% 23

Westchester 0 0% 3 5% 55 95% 58

Total 96 14% 145 20% 470 66% 711

Date post:	11-Oct-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

December 2012 - NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services...programming (80%) chemical dependency...

Documents