1
Decentralized Planning Experience in
Madhya Pradesh Madhya Pradesh
M.P. STATE PLANNING COMMISSIONM.P. STATE PLANNING COMMISSION
Overview
2
This presentation provides a This presentation provides a brief overview of sharing the model brief overview of sharing the model designed to rollout the Decentralized designed to rollout the Decentralized
Planning Process in the State Planning Process in the State
Present Status
3
Villages participated in process
Block plans
ULB plans
Districts plan
Remark
52000 313360(+ 6000 wards)
50Online available in public domain …….of preparation of various plan through decentralized approach
First ever…… First ever…… • Prioritizing Activities by COMMUNITY themselves .• Beneficiary identification during the planning process by GRAM SABHA.• Assessing status of Basic infrastructure of the state • Assessing status Delivery of services.
Key Sectors involved
4
Departments (No)
Development Schemes (No.)
Community Demands / Activities (No)
Remark
28 180 10,00,000(Approx. )
Online available in public domain
Framework, Organizational Structures, Methods, Techniques, Tools Prescribed
5
“MP Model” (DPP structure) of Madhya Pradesh State Planning Commission ( Link A)
Technical Support System for Capacity building of Planning Units . (Link B)
Technical Support Groups for facilitation of planning processes ( Link C)
Methods, techniques, tools prescribed (LINK D)
Outputs of DPP
6
Village Master Plan (52,000 Plans )Village Panchayat Plan(23,000 Plans)Block level Plan (313 Plans)Districts Plan (50 Districts Plans)Rural and Urban Plan (Separate)Scheme specific plan (965 Plans) Example
RKVY-Dist. Morena Sector Plans (06 Key Sectors )Department Plans (All ) Beneficiary identification.Planning & feedback mechanism (in
process).
Main Advantages of this Exercise
7
Ownership of plans & Involvement of stakeholders
Integrate participatory monitoring, evaluation and learning systems within the planning cycle itself
Prioritize planning in advance for all departments/schemes/sectors especially flagship programmes
Resource matching with “preferences of peoples’ demand” and “Departments’ pre-set targets”
Effective efficient use of through access to untied funds through village level plans like CDAP, NREGA, SSA, BRGF plan etc.
Achievement of sectoral goals (MDGs/ 11th 5yr. Plan) through convergence amongst departments and schemes
… Main Advantages
8
Enhance sensitivity and accountability towards preferences of people Build awareness level on schemesFeedback to improve scheme design
Transparency, Feed-back possible Provide opportunity to build capacities of grassroots level
govt. functionaries Ensure Social Inclusion. Scope of local innovation Identifying champions at every level of
implementation Driving convergences at the district level
Area of further Improvement (Quality issues)
9
Limited communication efforts specially mass communication
Convergence Role of elected representativesManaging and sustaining ChangeUrban Planning Integration of rural and urbanHuman Resources (inadequate)
Area of further Improvement (Quality issues)
10
Limited capacity building efforts : Strengthening of DPCs and District Planning Offices Capacity development of key Stake holders specially
in DPP, Acts, urban planning etc. Data management system Capacity Building in software application E- learning programmes
Empanelment of National experts /Quality Institutes
Inclusion of DPP section in other developmental modules
Way Forward …
11
Community based monitoring system -Social audit
Resource mapping as per the demand GIS based action monitoringAwards and appreciationsPolitical sensitization Strengthening of capacity of DPCs and key
stake holders
Thanks
12