+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Decision Analysis.lecfinal

Decision Analysis.lecfinal

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: joyce-ann-jarabelo-juyo
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 45

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    1/45

    1

    *

    *Problem Formulation

    *Decision Making without Probabilities

    *Decision Making with Probabilities*Risk Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis

    *Decision Analysis with Sample Information

    *Computing Branch Probabilities

    *Utility and Decision Making

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    2/45

    2

    *

    *A decision problem is characterized by decisionalternatives, states of nature, and resulting payoffs.

    *The decision alternatives are the different possiblestrategies the decision maker can employ.

    *The states of nature refer to future events, not underthe control of the decision maker, which willultimately affect decision results. States of natureshould be defined so that they are mutually exclusiveand contain all possible future events that couldaffect the results of all potential decisions.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    3/45

    3

    *

    *Decision theory problems are

    generally represented as one ofthe following:

    *Influence Diagram

    * Payoff Table

    *Decision Tree

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    4/45

    4

    *

    *An influence diagram is a graphical deviceshowing the relationships among the

    decisions, the chance events, and theconsequences.

    *Squares or rectangles depict decision nodes.

    *Circles or ovals depict chance nodes.*Diamonds depict consequence nodes.

    *Lines or arcs connecting the nodes show thedirection of influence.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    5/45

    5

    *

    *The consequence resulting from a specific

    combination of a decision alternative and astate of nature is a payoff.

    *A table showing payoffs for all combinationsof decision alternatives and states of nature isa payoff table.

    *Payoffs can be expressed in terms of profit,cost, time, distance or any other appropriate

    measure.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    6/45

    6

    **

    A decision tree is a chronological representation ofthe decision problem.

    *Each decision tree has two types of nodes; roundnodes correspond to the states of nature while

    square nodes correspond to the decisionalternatives.

    *The branches leaving each round node represent thedifferent states of nature while the branches leavingeach square node represent the different decision

    alternatives.

    *At the end of each limb of a tree are the payoffsattained from the series of branches making up thatlimb.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    7/45

    7

    *

    A developer must decide how large a

    luxury condominium complex to build small, medium, or large. Theprofitability of this complex depends

    upon the future level of demand forthe complexs condominiums.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    8/45

    8

    *

    * States of nature: The states of nature could

    be defined as low demand and high demand.* Alternatives: CAL could decide to build asmall, medium, or large condominium complex.

    * Payoffs: The profit for each alternativeunder each potential state of nature is going tobe determined.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    9/45

    *

    9

    Alternatives Low HighSmall 8 8Medium 5 15

    Large -11 22

    States of Nature

    (payoffs in millions of dollars)

    THIS IS A PROFIT PAYOFF TABLE

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    10/45

    10

    *

    Medium Complex

    8

    8

    5

    15

    22

    -11

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    11/45

    11

    *

    *Three commonly used criteria fordecision making when probability

    information regarding the likelihood ofthe states of nature is unavailable are:

    *the optimistic approach

    *the conservative approach*the minimax regret approach.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    12/45

    12

    **The optimistic approach would be used by anoptimistic decision maker.

    *The decision with the best possible payoff is

    chosen.*If the payoff table was in terms of costs, thedecision with the lowest cost would bechosen.

    *If the payoff table was in terms of profits,the decision with the highest profit would bechosen.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    13/45

    13

    **For each decision the worst payoff is listed and thenthe decision corresponding to the best of these worstpayoffs is selected. (Hence, the worst possiblepayoff is maximized.)

    *If the payoff was in terms of costs, the maximumcosts would be determined for each decision andthen the decision corresponding to the minimum ofthese maximum costs is selected. (Hence, the

    maximum possible cost is minimized.)*If the payoff was in terms of profits, the minimumprofits would be determined for each decision andthen the decision corresponding to the maximum ofthese minimum profits is selected. (Hence, the

    minimum possible profit is maximized.)

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    14/45

    14

    *

    1. The minimax regret approach requires theconstruction of a regret table or anopportunity loss table. This is done by

    calculating for each state of nature thedifference between each payoff and the bestpayoff for that state of nature.

    2. Then, using this regret table, the maximum

    regret for each possible decision is listed.3. The decision chosen is the onecorresponding to the minimum of themaximum regrets.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    15/45

    15

    *

    *If the optimistic approach is selected:

    STATES OF NATUREBEST

    Alternatives Low HighPROFIT

    Small 8 8 8

    Medium 5 15 15

    Large -11 22 22

    MaximaxMaximaxpayoffpayoff

    MaximaxMaximaxdecisiondecision

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    16/45

    16

    *

    *If the conservative approach is selected:

    STATES OF NATUREWORST

    Alternatives Low HighPROFIT

    Small 8 8 8

    Medium 5 15 5

    Large -11 22 -11

    MaximinMaximinpayoffpayoff

    MaximinMaximindecisiondecision

    The decision with the best profit from the column of worst profits is selected.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    17/45

    17

    *

    *If the minimax regret approach is selected:

    Step 1: Determine the best payoff for each state ofnature and create a regret table.

    STATES OF NATURE

    Alternatives Low High

    Small

    8 8Medium 5 15

    Large -11 22

    Best Profit

    for Low8

    Best Profit

    for High22

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    18/45

    18

    **If the minimax regret approach is selected:

    Step 1: Create a regret table (continued).STATES OF NATURE

    Alternatives Low High

    Small 0 14

    Medium 3 7Large 19 0

    For a profit payoff

    table,entries in

    the regret tablerepresent profits

    that could have

    been earned.

    If they knew in advanced that the demand would be low, they would have built a

    small complex. Without this psychic insight, if they decided to build a medium

    facility and the demand turned out to be low, they would regret building a medium

    complex because they only made 5 million dollars instead of 8 million had they built

    a small facility instead. They regret their decision by 3 million dollars.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    19/45

    19

    *

    *If the minimax regret approach is selected:

    Step 2: Create a regret table (continued).Step 3: Determine the maximum regret for eachdecision.

    STATES OF NATUREMax

    Alternatives Low HighRegret

    Small 0 14 14

    Medium 3 7 7

    Large 19 0 19Regret not getting a profit

    of 19 more than not making

    a profit of 0.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    20/45

    20

    *

    *If the minimax regret approach is selected:

    Step 4: Select the decision with the minimum valuefrom the column of max regrets.

    STATES OF NATUREMax

    Alternatives Low HighRegret

    Small 0 14 14

    Medium 3 7 7

    Large 19 0 19

    MinimaxMinimaxRegretRegretpayoffpayoff

    MinimaxMinimaxRegretRegret

    decisiondecision

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    21/45

    21

    *

    *Expected Value Approach

    *If probabilistic information regarding the states of

    nature is available, one may use the expected value

    (EV) approach.*Here the expected return for each decision is

    calculated by summing the products of the payoff

    under each state of nature and the probability of the

    respective state of nature occurring.*The decision yielding the best expected return is

    chosen.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    22/45

    22

    *

    *The expected value of a decision alternative is the sum ofweighted payoffs for the decision alternative.

    *The expected value (EV) of decision alternative di isdefined as:

    where: N= the number of states of nature

    P(sj ) = the probability of state of nature sjVij = the payoff corresponding to decision

    alternative di and state of nature sj

    EV( ) ( )d P s V i j ijj

    N!

    !

    1

    EV( ) ( )d P s V i j ijj

    N!

    !

    1

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    23/45

    23

    *

    Burger Prince Restaurant is contemplating opening anew restaurant on Main Street. It has three differentmodels, each with a different seating capacity. BurgerPrince estimates that the average number of customers

    per hour will be 80, 100, or 120. The payoff table(profits) for the three models is on the next slide.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    24/45

    24

    *

    *Payoff Table

    Average Number of Customers Per Hour

    s1 = 80 s2 =100 s3 =

    120

    Model A $10,000 $15,000 $14,000

    Model B $ 8,000 $18,000 $12,000

    Model C $ 6,000 $16,000 $21,000

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    25/45

    25

    *

    *Expected Value Approach

    Calculate the expected value foreach decision.

    Here d1, d2, d3 represent the decisionalternatives of models A, B, C, and s1,

    s2, s3 represent the states of nature of80, 100, and 120.

    Suppose that optimism leads to an initialsubjective probability assessment of .4,

    .2 & .4 respectively.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    26/45

    26

    *Example: BurgerP

    rince

    *Decision Tree

    1

    .2

    .4

    .4

    .4

    .2

    .4

    .4

    .2

    .4

    d1

    d2

    d3

    s1

    s1

    s1

    s2

    s3

    s2

    s2

    s3

    s3

    Payoffs10,000

    15,000

    14,000

    8,000

    18,000

    12,000

    6,00016,000

    21,000

    2

    3

    4

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    27/45

    27

    Example: Burger Prince

    Expected Value For Each Decision

    Choose the model with largest EV, Model C.

    3

    d1

    d2

    d3

    EMV = .4(10,000) + .2(15,000) + .4(14,000)= $12,600

    EMV = .4(8,000) + .2(18,000) + .4(12,000)= $11,600

    EMV = .4(6,000) + .2(16,000) + .4(21,000)

    = $14,000

    Model A

    Model B

    Model C

    2

    1

    4

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    28/45

    28

    *

    *Suppose market research was

    conducted in the community wherethe complex will be built. Thisresearch allowed the company toestimate that the probability of low

    demand will be 0.35, and theprobability of high demand will be0.65. Which decision alternativeshould they select.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    29/45

    29

    *

    STATES OF NATUREAlternatives Low (0.35) High (0.65)

    Small 8 8

    Medium 5 15Large -11 22

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    30/45

    30

    *

    STATES OF NATUREAlternatives Low High

    (0.35) (0.65) Expectedvalue (EV)

    Small

    8 8 8(0.35) +8(0.65) = 8

    Medium 5 15 5(0.35) +15(0.65) = 11.5

    Large -11 22 -11(0.35) +22(0.65) = 10.45

    Recall that this is a profit payoff table. Thus since the decision to build a medium

    complex has the highest expected profit, this is our best decision.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    31/45

    31

    *

    *Frequently information is available which canimprove the probability estimates for the statesof nature.

    *The expected value of perfect information(EVPI) is the increase in the expected profit thatwould result if one knew with certainty which

    state of nature would occur.*The EVPI provides an upper bound on theexpected value of any sample or surveyinformation.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    32/45

    32

    *

    *EVPI Calculation

    *Step 1:

    Determine the optimal return corresponding to each

    state of nature.*Step 2:

    Compute the expected value of these optimal

    returns.

    *Step 3:

    Subtract the EV of the optimal decision from the

    amount determined in step (2).

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    33/45

    33

    *

    *Expected Value ofPerfect Information

    Calculate the expected value for theoptimum payoff for each state of nature andsubtract the EV of the optimal decision.

    EVPI= .4(10,000) + .2(18,000) + .4(21,000) -14,000 = $2,000

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    34/45

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    35/45

    *If a small change in the value of one of the

    inputs causes a change in therecommended decision alternative, extraeffort and care should be taken inestimating the input value.

    *One approach to sensitivity analysis is toarbitrarily assign different values to theprobabilities of the states of nature and/orthe payoffs and resolve the problem. If

    the recommended decision changes, thenyou know that the solution is sensitive tothe changes

    35

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    36/45

    36

    *

    *For the special case of two states of nature, agraphical technique can be used to determine

    how sensitive the solution is to theprobabilities associated with the states ofnature.

    *This problem has two states of nature.

    Previously, we stated that CAL Condominiumsestimated that the probability of future lowdemand is 0.35 and 0.65 is the probability ofhigh demand. These probabilities yielded the

    recommended decision to build the mediumcomplex.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    37/45

    37

    *In order to see how sensitive thisrecommendation is to changingprobability values, we will let pequal the probability of low demand.

    Thus (1-p) is the probability of highdemand. Therefore

    EV( small) = 8*p + 8*(1-p)= 8

    EV( medium) = 5*p + 15*(1-p) = 15 10p

    EV( large) = -11*p + 22*(1-p) = 22 33p

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    38/45

    38

    *

    *Next we will plot the expected value

    lines for each decision by plotting pon the x axis and EV on the y axis.

    *EV( small) = 8

    EV( medium) = 15 10p

    EV( large) = 22 33p

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    39/45

    39

    *

    0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 10

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    EV( small)

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    40/45

    40

    *

    *Since CAL condominiums list

    payoffs are in terms of profits,we know that the highest profitsis desirable.

    *Look over the entire range of p(p=0 to p=1) and determine therange over which each decisionyields the highest profits.

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    41/45

    41

    *

    0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 10

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    EV( small)

    B1 B2

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    42/45

    42

    *

    *Do not estimate the values of B1 or B2 (the points where theintersection of lines occur). Determine the exact intersectionpoints.

    *B1 is the point where the EV( large) line intersects with the EV( medium) line:

    To find this point set these two lines equal to each other andsolve for p.

    22-33p= 15-10p

    7= 23p

    p=7/23= 0.3403

    *B2 is the point where the EV( medium) line intersects with theEV( small) line:

    15-10p = 8

    7 = 10p

    p = 0.7

    So B1 equals 0.3403

    So B2 equals 0.7

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    43/45

    43

    *

    0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 10

    5

    1 0

    1 5

    2 0

    2 5

    EV( small)

    0.3403 0.7

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    44/45

    44

    *

    *From the graph we see that if the probabilityof low demand (p) is between 0 and 0.3403,

    we recommend building a large complex.*From the graph we see that if the probabilityof low demand (p) is between 0.3403 and 0.7,we recommend building a medium complex.

    *From the graph we see that if the probabilityof low demand (p) is between 0.7 and 1, werecommend building a large complex.

    *

  • 8/3/2019 Decision Analysis.lecfinal

    45/45

    45

    *

    See your textbook for moreexamples and detailed explanations

    of all topics discussed in these notes.


Recommended