Decision and Order - Toronto€¦ · DECISION AND ORDER Decision Issue Date Wednesday, July 24,...

Toronto Local Appeal Body 40 Orchard View Blvd, Suite 211 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9

Telephone: 416-392-4697 Fax: 416-696-4307 Email: [email protected] Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab

DECISION AND ORDER Decision Issue Date Wednesday, July 24, 2019

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 45(12), subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")

Appellant(s): ARCICA INC

Applicant: ARCICA INC

Property Address/Description: 106 MUNRO BLVD

Committee of Adjustment Case File Number: 18 221023 NNY 25 MV

TLAB Case File Number: 18 248044 S45 25 TLAB

Hearing date: Wednesday, May 01, 2019

DECISION DELIVERED BY SHAHEYNOOR TALUKDER

APPEARANCES

Name Role

Wenshan Huang Owner

Zhengrong Zhang Primary Owner

Arcica Inc. Appellant

Jonathan Benczkowski Expert Witness

Esther Keri Participant

INTRODUCTION

1. This is an appeal by the owners, Wenshan Huang and Zhengrong Zhang, of the property located at 106 Munro Blvd (subject property). The owners appealed the Committee of Adjustment (COA)’s decision, which partially approved and partially

1 of 7

mailto:[email protected]://www.toronto.ca/tlab

Decision of Toronto Local Appeal Body Panel Member: S. TALUKDERTLAB Case File Number: 18 248044 S45 25 TLAB

refused applications for variances for the construction of a new detached dwelling on the Property.

2. The only party to the Toronto Local Appeal Body (TLAB) proceeding was theApplicant owners, who were represented by counsel, Ms. Amber Stewart, on the hearing day.

3. The participant, Esther Keri, did not attend the hearing even though she had fileda participant statement with the TLAB. Ms. Keri is the owner of the adjacent property at 108 Munroe Blvd, which is east to the subject property.

4. At the hearing, I informed those in attendance that I had visited the site of thesubject property and walked around the neighbourhood to familiarize myself withthe neighbourhood.

MATTERS IN ISSUE

5. The Applicant proposes to build a new detached dwelling, which requires the following v ariances (as stated in the COA decision):

1. Chapter 10.20.40.70, By-Law 569-2013 The minimum required side yard setback is 1.8m. The proposed west side yard setback is 1.5m. 2. Chapter 10.20.40.70, By-Law 569-2013 The minimum required side yard setback is 1.8m. The proposed east side yard setback is 1.5m. 3. Chapter 10.20.40.20, By-Law 569-2013 The maximum permitted building length is 17.0m. The proposed building length is 17.98m. 4. Chapter 10.20.40.10, By-Law 569-2013 The maximum permitted side wall height is 7.5m. The proposed east and west side wall heights are 7.8m. 5. Chapter 10.20.40.10, By-Law 569-2013 The maximum permitted height of the pedestrian entrance through the front mainwall is 1.2m. The proposed height of the pedestrian entrance through the front main wall is 1.62m. 6. Chapter 10.5.80.40.(3), By-Law 569-2013

2 of 7

http:10.20.40.10http:10.20.40.10http:10.20.40.20http:10.20.40.70http:10.20.40.70


Vehicle access to a parking space on a corner lot must be from a flanking street that is not a major street. The proposed vehicle access to a parking space is from the street on which the lot fronts.

7. Section 12.7, By-Law 7625 The maximum permitted building height is 8.8m. The proposed building height is 9.1m.

6. The COA approved all variances except Variances 2 and 3.

7. At the hearing, Ms. Stewart provided a list of revised variances, which is attached to this decision as Attachment 1. The only difference between the requested variances at the COA and the revised list is Variance 5. The proposed height of the pedestrian entrance through the front main wall is decreased from 1.62m to 1.38m.

8. Ms. Stewart also proposed the following conditions for the approval of the variances, which are attached to this decision as Attachment 2:

a. The proposed dwelling shall be constructed substantially in accordance with the Site Plan and Elevations prepared by Arcica Inc. dated August 30, 2018 (Attachment 3).

b. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Parks and Recreation, Urban Forestry Division:

1. Submission of a complete application for a permit to injure or destroy a City-owned tree(s). A Contractor's Agreement to Perform Work on City-owned Trees will be required prior to the removal/injure of the subject tree(s). Form located at www.toronto.ca/trees/pdfs/contractor_services_agreement_informa tion.pdf.

2. Submission of a tree protection guarantee security deposit to guarantee the protection of City-owned trees according to the Tree Protection Policy and Specifications for Construction Near Trees or as otherwise approved by Urban Forestry. Accepted methods of payment include debit or card, certified cheque or money order payable to the Treasurer of the City of Toronto, or Letter of Credit.

3. Submission of a c omplete application for permit to injure or remove privately owned trees.

3 of 7

http://www.toronto.ca/trees/pdfs/contractor_services_agreement_information.pdfhttp://www.toronto.ca/trees/pdfs/contractor_services_agreement_information.pdf


c. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Transportation Services Department:

1. The access on Birchwood Avenue must be removed and restored to soft landscaping.

2. The owner must apply for a Construction Access Permit from Transportation Services Right-of-Way Management for the required access approval and curb repairs.

9. The conditions in sub-paragraph 8(c) are conditions requested by the Transportation Services Department in their memorandum dated October 2, 2018.

JURISDICTION

Provincial Policy – S. 3

10. A decision of the Toronto Local Appeal Body (‘TLAB’) must be consistent with the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (‘PPS’) and conform to the Growth Plan of the Greater Golden Horseshoe for the subject area (‘Growth Plan’).

Minor Variance – S. 45(1)

11. In considering the applications for variances form the Zoning By-laws, the TLAB Panel must be satisfied that the applications meet all of the four tests under s. 45(1) of the Act. The tests are whether the variances:

• maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan;

• maintain the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-laws;

• are desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land; and

• are minor.

EVIDENCE

12. The Applicants called Jonathan B enczkowski, a Registered Professional Planner, who I accepted as qualified to give professional land use planning opinion

4 of 7


evidence. Mr. Benczkowski provided the sole source of viva voce evidence. There was no contrary evidence presented.

13. Mr. Benczkowski testified that the proposed minor variances are consistent with the PPS and the Growth Plan, and satisfy the four tests for approval of variances. His testimony and his witness statement to support his conclusion are summarized below.

14. Mr. Benczkowski described the current dwelling on the subject property as a one and half storey building, where the back of the house is split into two levels. The subject property is a corner lot, located on the south-east corner of Munro Boulevard and Birchwood Avenue.

15. Mr. Benczkowski defined his study area to be bounded by Gordon Road to the north, Munro Boulevard to the south, Old Yonge Street to the west, the cul-desac at the end of Munro Boulevard and Owen Boulevard to the west. He chose this study area because it generally reflects what a resident of the area would experience in their day-to-day lives, such as walking the streets and having their children attend Owen Public School. The subject property is in an area designated as a Neighbourhood in the OP.

16. Mr. Benczkowski testified that the study area has a mix of built forms, dwelling types and architectural styles. The n eighbourhood contains detached dwellings exclusively, which are bungalows and new two storey dwellings. As a result of significant reinvestment in the neighbourhood, many of the traditional bungalows have been r eplaced with two storey detached dwellings. This has led to the predominant built form being t wo storey buildings and few existing original bungalows.

17. The proposed dwelling on the subject property will be a two storey building, similar to the predominant building type in the study area. The driveway way will be relocated on Munro Blvd and will lead to a two-car garage. The proposed dwelling w ill have a deck, which will be located the furthest possible distance from the neighbouring lot (108 Munroe Blvd) and near Birchwood Avenue, to avoid any privacy overlook into the neighbouring lots. After it is built, the proposed dwelling will be similar to the predominant buildings in the neighbourhood and would fit harmoniously in the neighborhood as required under OP policy no. 3.1.2 and policy no. 4.1.5(c).

18. The side yard setback on the east of 1.5m is an existing c ondition. The requested variances for side yard setback on both the east and west side (variances 1 and 2) are consistent with past approvals, which were around 1.2m–1.5m for side yard setbacks. Mr. Benczkowski believes that there is appropriate separation between the adjacent dwelling and that this type of separation is found throughout the neighbourhood.

5 of 7

http:1.2m�1.5m


19.With respect to variance 3, Mr. Benczkowski stated the proposed dwelling will be approximately 5m longer than the current dwelling, which is a negligible increase that would not be detrimental to the neighbours. In addition, the backyard setback is maintained and there is no request for variance related to lot coverage. Any shadowing resulting from the increased length will be negligent when taking into consideration that the neighbour on the eastern adjacent lot has approximately 18.5m of amenity space in the backyard.

20.Mr. Benczkowski testified that the requested variance for side wall height (variance 4), is not for the overall height of the dwelling but for the main side wall height. The variance is required for two windows on the second floor on the west side, which are designed to be above the maximum height of 7.5m. The remaining wall height of the side walls are at 7.5m. Similarly, the cut out for both windows on the east side resulted in the requirement for a variance for the increase in the side wall height. The remainder of the wall height is within the zoning by-law requirement. With respect to the variance for building height (variance 7), the visible height increase is 7 inches from established grade, which is minor.

21.Mr. Benczkowski further testified that requested variance 5 is 0.12m more than what is permitted, which is equivalent to one extra step. This request is minor in nature and has no detrimental effect to the neighbours.

22.Mr. Benczkowski stated that the objective of the zoning requirement for variance 6 is to ensure the safe line of sight for the public and vehicle drivers on corner properties. The garage will be 25 ft from the curbed portion of the sidewalk excluding the city boulevard, allowing enough space for both pedestrian and a driver to ensure line of sight. It is the norm for corner lots to have the driveway entrance from the flanking street. Only one corner lot in the study area had a driveway off the flanking street.

ANALYSIS, FINDINGS, REASONS

23. In my view, the proposed variances are consistent with the policy direction in the PPS and policies of the Growth Plan, as these policies promote i ntensification within built up areas.

24. I have accepted Mr. Benczkowski’s testimony, which does not need to be repeated for analysis and which was not contradicted at the hearing. Based on this evidence, I conclude that the variances individually and cumulatively have met the four tests.

6 of 7


DECISION A ND ORDER

25.The applications for variances as listed in Attachment 1 are approved and are subject to the conditions set out in Attachment 2, which includes a condition with respect to the site plans attached to this decision as Attachment 3.

X Shaheynoor Talukder Panel Chair, Toronto Local Appeal Body Signed by: Shaheynoor Talukder

7 of 7

ATTACHMENT 1

Revised List of Variances – 106 MUNRO BOULEVARD

PURPOSE OF THE APPLICATION:

To construct a new detached dwelling.

REQUESTED VARIANCE(S) TO THE ZONING BY-LAW:

1. Chapter 10.20.40.70, By-Law 569-2013 The minimum required side yard setback is 1.8m. The proposed west side yard setback is 1.5m.

2. Chapter 10.20.40.70, By-Law 569-2013The minimum required side yard setback is 1.8m. The proposed east side yard setback is 1.5m.

3. Chapter 10.20.40.20, By-Law 569-2013The maximum permitted building length is 17.0m. The proposed building length is 17.98m.

4. Chapter 10.20.40.10, By-Law 569-2013The maximum permitted side wall height is 7.5m.!The proposed east and west side wall heights are 7.8m.!

5. Chapter 10.20.40.10, By-Law 569-2013The maximum permitted height of the pedestrian entrance through the front main!wall is 1.2m.!The proposed height of the pedestrian entrance through the front main wall is 1.38m.'

6. Chapter 10.5.80.40.(3), By-Law 569-2013Vehicle access to a parking space on a corner lot must be from a flanking street that!is not a major street.!The proposed vehicle access to a parking space is from the street on which the lot!fronts.!

7. Section 12.7, By-Law 7625The maximum permitted building height is 8.8m. The proposed building height is 9.1m.

http:10.20.40.10http:10.20.40.10http:10.20.40.20http:10.20.40.70http:10.20.40.70

ATTACHMENT 2

106 Munro Blvd. – Conditions of Approval

1. The proposed dwelling shall be constructed substantially in accordance with the Site Plan and Elevations prepared by Arcica Inc. dated August 30, 2018, which are attached to this decision as Attachment 3.

2. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Parks and Recreation, Urban Forestry Division:

a. Submission of a complete application for a permit to injure or destroy a City-

owned tree(s). A Contractor's Agreement to Perform Work on City-owned Trees will be required prior to the removal/injure of the subject tree(s). Form located at www.toronto.ca/trees/pdfs/contractor_services_agreement_information.pdf.

b. Submission of a tree protection guarantee security deposit to guarantee the protection of City-owned trees according to the Tree Protection Policy and Specifications for Construction Near Trees or as otherwise approved by Urban Forestry. Accepted methods of payment include debit or card, certified cheque or money order payable to the Treasurer of the City of Toronto, or Letter of Credit.

c. Submission of a complete application for permit to injure or remove privately owned trees.

3. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Transportation Services Department:

a. The access on Birchwood Avenue must be removed and restored to soft

landscaping.

b. The owner must apply for a C onstruction Access Permit from Transportation Services Right-of-Way Management for the required access approval and curb repairs.

http://www.toronto.ca/trees/pdfs/contractor_services_agreement_information.pdf

ATTACHMENT 3

REGISTERED

0.61

2'-0"

WALK-UP

LOT 53

PLAN M-518

165.89169.04

DECK

166.60

4.45 14'-7"

4.42 14'-6"

3.33 10'-11"

5.36 17'-7"

14.58

47'-10"

2.49

8'-2"

2.49 8'-2"

0.30 1'-0"

0.30

1'-0"

0.91

3'-0"

1.52

5'-0"

14.32

47'-0"

2.74

9'-0"

1.07

3'-6"

3.10 10'-2"

17.07

56'-0"

17.07

56'-0"

0.61

2'-0"

Zoning Data Matrix R3 & RD (f18, a690) Proposed

Front Yard Area

Driveway Area

Porch and Walkway Area

Landscape Open Space Area

Soft Landscaping Area

Building Area(Coverage)

Main Floor Area

Second Floor Area

418.51 - 38.88

116.25 - 10.79

622.90 - 57.87 (59.8%)

506.76 - 47.08 (81.3%)

2369.17 -220.10 (34.83%)

2427.01 - 225.47

2369.17 - 220.10

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

m2

s.f.

s.f.

s.f.

s.f.

m2s.f.

s.f.

s.f.

s.f.

6801.83 - 631.91 Lot Area m2s.f.

Plan # M-518

Lot # 53

Gross Floor Area 4796.18 - 445.57 m2s.f.

1041.49 - 96.75

notes:

ALI SHAKERI T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900

Designed by:

17.98

59'-0"

PROPOSED 2-STOREY NEW CONSTRUCTION

DWELLING

FINISH MAIN FLOOR : 169.24 FINISH FIRST FLOOR : 168.15

TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL : VAR. TOP OF BASEMENT SLAB : 166.04/165.46

UNDER OF FOOTING : VAR OR 4' BELOW GRADE WICHEVER DEEPER

166.69

1.52 5'-0"

12.19 40'-0"

1.52 5'-0"

17.98

59'-0"

ARCICA INC. 326 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST,

M2N 3B4 TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA

revisions:

AUG 30, 2018 -issued for COA

166.84

0.61

2'-0"

166.65

PROPOSED DRIVEWAY

PORCH 167.96

0.421'-4 1/2"

2.44 8'-0"

4.1513'-7 1/2"

4.27 14'-0"

0.91 3'-0"

0.46 1'-6"

0.46 1'-6"

2.79 9'-2"

0.902'-11 1/2"

0.301'-0"

6.10

20'-0"

1.37

4'-6"

1.22

4'-0" 1.83

6'-0"

0.41 1'-4"

0.41 1'-4"

6.40

21'-0"

6.40

21'-0"

0.41 1'-4"

1.98 6'-6"

0.41 1'-4"

166.71

0.61

2'-0"

5.79

19'-0"

1.83

6'-0"

2.08

6'-10" 1 ALL WORK SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN

STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST REVISION OF THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE. 2. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION SHALL BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON THE JOB AND ANY VARIANCES OR DISCREPANCIES MUST BE REPORTED TO F&A ASSOCIATES BY PHONE AND SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN CONFIRMATION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK. 5. USE ONLY LATEST REVISED DRAWINGS OF THOSE THAT ARE MARKED "ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION". 6. ALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN MUST BE

2.0

%

166.55

2.79 9'-2" 1.98 6'-6"

0.30 1'-0"

7.6325'-0 1/2"

6.07 19'-11"

1.545'-0 1/2"

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY CERTIFIED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION

project:

106 MUNRO BOULEVARD drawing:

SITE PLAN scale:

3/32" = 1'-0"

page:

A 01

THIS UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED & TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS DESIGN, & HAS THE QUALIFICATIONS & MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS SET OUT

MUNRO BOULEVARD IN THE O.B.C. TO BE A DESIGNER

166.65 Ali Shakeri BCIN#24574 F&A Associates Ltd. BCIN#30998

B2 B2

40'-0" notes: 12.1916'-9" 10'-2" 13'-1" STRUCTURAL MEMBERS: 5.11 3.1 3.99 J1: LPI 20 Plus 117/8" @16'' o/c 1'-0" 8'-2" 1'-0" J2: LPI 42 Plus 117/8" @16'' o/c 0.3 2.49 0.36x6 J3: LPI 42 Plus 117/8" @12'' o/c

B1: 1-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. B2: 2-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP.

P.T. 166.60

B3: 3-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. 32 6x6 6x63-2x12P.T. 3-2x12P.T.32 B4: 4-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP.

5'-0

" 3'

-0"

1.52

0.

91

P.T. 31 31P.T. C1: HSS Ø 102X830

2-2x

12P.

T.

2-2X

12 P

.T.

@12

" O/C

+5X5X1/2" PL. TOP +6X10X1/2" PL. BOTT.

FLOOR 4UP WALK UP-11' - 0"

6'-0"1'-4" 2'-8 1/2" 9'-0" 0.412

-2x1

2P.T

.

+21/2" A.B. DRAIN C3: 3-2x6

165.89 m 1'-1" C4: 4-2x6 1'-1" 3'-8 1/2" 2'-11" 6'-0" 2'-10" 1'-4" L1: 3-2x10 0.33 1.83 0.330.83 2.74 1.13 0.89 1.83 0.86 0.41 L2: 3-2X12

2-2X

6@

12" B2

L1+S1 L1+S1S1: L 31/2 x 31/2 x 5/16 S2: L 5 x 31/2 x 3/8 WP1: 6"X12"X1/2" STEEL PLATE WITH 2 HOOKS

B3+S2

59'-0

" 17

.98

1'-4

" 13

'-4 1

/2"

3 1/

2"

7'-0

" 3

1/2"

9'

-1 1

/2"

3 1/

2"

25'-1

1 1/

2"

1'-4

" 0.

41

4.08

0.

09

2.13

0.

09

2.78

0.

09

7.91

0.

41

2'-0

" 3'

-0"

3'-0

" 11

'-0"

1'-7

" 0.

61

0.91

3.

35

0.91

0.

48

CO

NC

. FO

OTI

NG

2'-0

" 3'

-0"

11'-0

" 3'

-0"

1'-7

" 1'

-4"

22''x

6'',2

0MPA

2-1

5M0.

61

0.91

3.

35

0.91

0.

48 0

.41

C3 C3 C3C3 R22 min. 37'-4"

11.38

L1+S

1 L1

+S1

L1+S

1 L1

+S1

5'-6

" 9'

-7"

5'-6

" 1.

68

2.92

1.

68

4'-6" 4'-0" 1.37 1.22

20

BAR RECREATION

B2 B2 R22 min. ROOM

20'-7

"

1.83

2.

08

CO

NT.

(TYP

.)10

" 21

'-0"

5 1/

2"

14'-4

" 5

1/2"

20

'-7"

0.25

6.

4 0.

14

4.37

0.

14

6.27

59'-0

" 17

.98

6.27

F.P. -10' - 6"

J3 38166.04 m

5 J3J3

Designed by:

ALI SHAKERI T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900

ARCICA INC.

33 F1=4'x4'x24'' 33 5'-4 1/2" 5'-9" 6'-5" 19'-9 1/2"

1.64 1.96 6.033'-6" 1.75 2'-3" C2 F1=4'x4'x24''C2 1.07 0.69 W250x58 C2 C230"

UP

3'-7

1/4

"

4

CONT. 31 5'-0" 30 1.5216

1.1 WINE 30" 14'-0 1/2"

326 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST, '-0"

1.22

B2

FLOOR CELLER 4.2831 ELEV. B2

DRAIN

M2N 3B4TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA

revisions:


1 ALL WORK SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST REVISION OF THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE.

3'-1

0"

3'-0

" 7'

-6"

1.17

0.

91

2.29

11'-3

1/2

"

5'-0

" B3 J1 205'-2"

1.573.44

3'-6"

B2 6'-2

1/4"

4'-11" 1.5

MECH.ROOM

FLOOR

0.46

1.

89

5'-0

"

1.07SHOWER J1

14'-4

" 4.

37

4UPB2

6'-3

" 1.

91

NANNY 303'-9 3/4" 4'-0" 2X6 1.16 1.22 24" ROOM 31

166.84

@12"

1'-6

"

DRAIN 30 53UP 4'-4 1/4" 1'-8" 3'-9 1/2" B2

1.33 0.51 1.16J1 32''

1.52

1.52

166.58 32''

1'-6

1/2

" 3'

-6"

1.07

3UP-12' - 5" 166.69 3'

-6"

1.07

165.46 m 3033

LBW2X6@16" 28'' 32''5'-4" 2'-6 3/4" C3 166.781.63 0.780.47

5'-3

1/2

" 1'

-8 1

/2"

1.61

0.

52

W200X52C1 C3C3 line of 10"conc. CONT. C18'-10 3/4" 1'-10" weather stripping + foundation wall on 2.71 0.563'-6" F1

68'' 7'-0

" 2.

13

LAUNDRY self-closing device 26"x8" stip footing

min. 4' below 1.07

SHOWER 10'-8 3/4" 3.27

6.4

W15

0X37

2-

2X6@

12"

2-2X

6@12

"

5'-9

" 1.

75

garage grade W all garage walls and 3'-6"

D1.07 ceiling must be gas 28'' 30" proofed

2. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO 20'-0" 1'-6" CONSTRUCTION.6.1 0.46J1 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. C1C1 W200X52 CONT. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION

'-10

3/4"

2.

1 (FLUSH)

21'-0

"

SHALL BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON THE JOB AND ANY VARIANCES OR DISCREPANCIES MUST BE REPORTED TO F&A ASSOCIATES BY PHONE AND SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN CONFIRMATION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK. 5. USE ONLY LATEST REVISED DRAWINGS OF THOSE THAT ARE MARKED "ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION". 6. ALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY CERTIFIED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION

60"5 min. R31 insulation R22 min. 2-2x8 6CL.

15'-1" 2'-0"

LBW

2X6@

16" between garage

ceiling and first floor

6'-0

" 6'

-10"

THEATER

2-2X

6@12

" 4.6 0.61 2-

2X6@

12"

2% S

LOPE

2-2X6@12"

W15

0X37

W15

0X37

W15

0X37

J1 GARAGE35

6'-2

1/2

"

CL. C3 R22 min. 166.65 m C3C1 C1

60"

1.89

20

C3

project: C1 C1W200X42+1/4''PL. BOTT. 106 MUNRO BOULEVARDL1+S2

32''

4'-2

" 1'

-0"

L1+S1 0.3

1.27

drawing:W150X37+1/4''PL. W150X37+1/4''PL. 10" 7'-6" 10" BASEMENT PLAN0.25 2.29 0.25FLOOR DRAIN COLD 6'-0

" 1.

83

6'-0

" 1.

83

scale: page:1'-4" 1'-0 1/2" 6'-0" 2'-6" 0.41 0.32 1.83 0.76

2'-5 1/2" 15'-0" 1'-8" 10"ROOM 0.75 4.57 0.51 0.25

0.25

CONC. DECK,7'' THK. 32 3/16" = 1'-0" A 02 MPA, W/5%-7% AIR @ -7'' FROM FFF, REINFORCE

4'-0

" 10

"

14'-6

"

1.22

1'-4" 10" 4'-10" 10" 1'-4" 0.254.42

WITH 15M@10'' E.W. 0.410.25 1.47 0.41

4'-6

" 4'

-0"

1.37

1.

22

THIS UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED & PROVIDE 10M 16x16 BENT UNEXCAVATED 1'-0" TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS DOWELS & ANCHORED 0.3 DESIGN, & HAS THE QUALIFICATIONS &

MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS SET OUT IN THE O.B.C. TO BE A DESIGNER

8'-6

" 2.

59

INTO FDN.WALL@24'' O/C

4'-10" 1.47

10"

2'-1

0"

10"

0.25

0.

86

0.25

Ali ShakeriBCIN#24574NOTE:

ALL INTERIOR WALL 10'-10 1/2" 9'-2" 19'-11 1/2" F&A Associates Ltd. 3.31 2.79 6.08DIMENSIONS SHOW

40'-0" BCIN#30998FACE OF STUDS 12.19

mailto:FDN.WALL@24http:0.410.25

0.61

2'-0" 0.6

2 1 '-0"

40'-0" notes: 12.19 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS: 166.60 3130 J1: LPI 20 Plus 117/8" @16'' o/c

31

1'-0

" 3'

-6"

0.3

1.07

1.07

13 UP J2: LPI 42 Plus 117/8" @16'' o/c

J3: LPI 42 Plus 117/8" @12'' o/c B1: 1-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. B2: 2-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. B3: 3-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. B4: 4-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. 17'-7" C1: HSS Ø 102X8 +5X5X1/2" PL. TOPDECK 5.36 -0' - 8" +6X10X1/2" PL. BOTT.169.04 m +21/2" A.B. 31

14'-7" 14'-6" 10'-11" C3: 3-2x6 4.45 4.42 3.33 C4: 4-2x6

3 1/2" 7'-6" 3 1/2" L1: 3-2x10 0.09 2.29 0.09 L2: 3-2X12

11" 3'-0" 9'-0" 4'-0" 4'-3" 11" S1: L 31/2 x 31/2 x 5/16

2'-0

" 0.

61

0.28 0.91 2.74 B3+S2

1.22 1.3 0.28

J1 B3 S2: L 5 x 31/2 x 3/8 L1+S1L1 L1 WP1: 6"X12"X1/2" STEEL PLATE WITH 2 HOOKS

C1C1 W250x49+1/4''PL. 12'-1 1/4" D.W. TRASH C3C3

BUIL

T-IN

3'

-6"

3.69R22 min. BREAKFAST AREA

2'-0

"59

'-0"

8'-2

" 0.

61

17.9

8 2.

49

21'-0

" 11

" 11

" 19

'-4 1

/2"

5 1/

2"

7'-1

" 3

1/2"

8'

-6"

5 1/

2"

6.4

0.28

0.

28

5.91

0.

14

2.16

0.

09

2.59

0.

14

11'-0

" 3'

-0"

2'-0

" 2'

-0"

3'-0

" 8"

1'-4

" 6'

-4 1

/2"

6'-0

" 7'

-0"

8'-1

0"

2'-0

" 5'

-0"

2'-0

" 1'

-6"

6'-0

" 6'

-10"

0.

61

0.46

2.

69

0.61

1.

52

1.83

2.

08

11"

31'-3

" 3

1/2"

4'

-4"

3 1/

2"

21'-0

" 11

" 0.

28

9.53

0.

09

1.32

0.

09

6.4

0.28

2'

-0"

59'-0

" 0.

61

17.9

8

0.66

4'

-7 1

/2"

4'-6

" 10

'-0"

4'-6

" 2'

-0"

1.41

0.61

0.

91

3.35

0.

91

0.61

1.37

0.

61

8'-6" 2'-0" 2.59 0.61

L1+S

1 L1

+S1

KITCHEN FAMILY

38 ROOM F.P.

1.37

3.

05

J3 526 0' - 0" 169.24 m

27'-8" 5'-0" 3'-6" 8.43 1.52 1.07 Designed by:

BUIL

T-IN

ALI SHAKERI

T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900

ARCICA INC.326 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST,

M2N 3B4TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA

revisions:


1 ALL WORK SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST REVISION

38'-2" 11.63

12'-7 1/2" 5'-4" OVEN +M.W. 5'-9" 3'-6" 3'-8" 7'-3 1/2" 3.85 1.633'-6" 3'-4"

1.75 1.07 1.12 2.22C3 C31.07 1.02 C3B3C3 CONT. 5'-0" J1 DIRTY

2'-2

"

2x6 30 FRIDGE 1.52 KIT.@12'' 17 UP4'

-6"

B2

1.37

ELEV.

11'-5

" 4'

-0"

1.22

B2

J3

2'-5

1/2

"

POWDERROOM

30" 6'-10"

0.75

WINE 31 2.083-2x6 DISPLAY B3 30''

5'-6" 1'-8" 7'-0" 20'-2 1/2" 1.68 0.51 2.13 6.16

L1

L131

31 0.

56

4'-5

3/4

" 7'

-4 1

/4"

1.37

2.

24

J1

B3

26'' J1

DININGROOM

3'-6" CL. 1.07 31 30 3.

48

16DN

B256'' J1

2'-0" 9'-0" 0.61 2.74C3 C3C3 B3 CONT. C3LBW

C3 2X6@16"

0.3

1'-4

" 4'

-8"

1'-6

" 8'

-6 1

/2"

1'-6

" 6'

-0"

2'-3

1/2

" 0.

41

1.42

6'

-0"

1.83

0.

7 0.

46

2.6

0.46

1.

83

1'-1

0"

6'-0

" 1'

-10"

30F.P. BUILT-IN BUILT-IN

3UP38 30

1.94

1.

83

2.13

L1

+S1

C3

26

0.56

1.

83

3UP OF THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE. 2. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO 1'-6" 11'-0" 6'-6" 1'-10" 18'-6 1/2" CONSTRUCTION.0.46

FOR

TAL

L EX

TR. W

ALL

@EN

TRN

. PR

OVI

DE

2-2x

6@12

''O/C

W/B

LK'G

S @

6FT

.O.C

VER

T.

J1

3.35 1.98 0.56 5.65 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION SHALL BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON THE JOB AND ANY VARIANCES OR DISCREPANCIES MUST BE REPORTED TO F&A ASSOCIATES BY PHONE AND SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN CONFIRMATION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK.

LIVING

ROOM

5

LIBRARY30

3UP

L1+S

2 38J3 0' - 0" F.P.

-8 1

/2"

26 169.24 m ENTRANCE 60" -3' - 7" 5. USE ONLY LATEST REVISED DRAWINGS 5168.15 m OF THOSE THAT ARE MARKED "ISSUED

FOR CONSTRUCTION". 6. ALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY CERTIFIED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO

2.96

9'

1'-8" 18'-3" C3 CONSTRUCTION

project:

drawing:

106 MUNRO BOULEVARD

0.51 5.56R22 min.

C3 C3 C3 C3B2+S2 C1 W250x39+1/4''PL. C1

J1 42''

L1+S2 1'-0"

0.2 0

.41

1'-4"

L1+S

1 PORCH167.96 m 1st FLOOR PLAN

L1+S

10.41 11"B3+S2L111" 4" 6'-0" 4"

0.28

J1 10" 11'-0" 10" scale:1'-4" 6'-6" 1'-4" page:0.28 0.1 1.83 0.1 0.25 3.35 0.25 0.41 1.98 0.418" 6'-8" 8" 8" 12'-8" 8"6x6 6x6L1+S20.2 2.03 0.2 0.2 3.86 0.2 3/16" = 1'-0" A 03 P.T. P.T. 1'-4 1/2" 8'-0" 1'-6" 9'-2" 2'-11 1/2" 14'-0" 3'-0"

0.42 2.44 0.46 10'-10 1/2"

2.79 0.9 4.27 0.91 30 19'-11 1/2"

4'-6

" 4'

-0"

1.37

1.

22

3.31 6.08 THIS UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED & TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS DESIGN, & HAS THE QUALIFICATIONS &

6'-6" 1'-0" MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS SET OUT 1.98 0.3 IN THE O.B.C. TO BE A DESIGNER

7UP Ali ShakeriNOTE: BCIN#24574ALL INTERIOR WALL

40'-0" DIMENSIONS SHOW F&A Associates Ltd. 12.19FACE OF STUDS BCIN#30998

notes:

STRUCTURAL MEMBERS: J1: LPI 20 Plus 117/8" @16'' o/c J2: LPI 42 Plus 117/8" @16'' o/c J3: LPI 42 Plus 117/8" @12'' o/c B1: 1-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. B2: 2-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. B3: 3-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. B4: 4-LVL 117/8X13/4 2.0E TYP. C1: HSS Ø 102X8 +5X5X1/2" PL. TOP +6X10X1/2" PL. BOTT.

40'-0" +21/2" A.B. 12.19 C3: 3-2x6

0.28 11"

3.23 10'-7"

0.09 3 1/2"

5.79 19'-0"

0.09 3 1/2"

2.44 8'-0"

0.28 11" C4: 4-2x6

L1: 3-2x10

1.63 5'-4"

L1+S1 1.52 5'-0"

0.08 3"

0.61 2'-0"

L1+S1 1.83 6'-0"

0.91 3'-0"

1.83 6'-0"

L1+S1 0.61 2'-0"

0.46 1'-6"

1.52 5'-0"

L1+S1 0.46 1'-6" L2: 3-2X12

S1: L 31/2 x 31/2 x 5/16 S2: L 5 x 31/2 x 3/8 WP1: 6"X12"X1/2" STEEL PLATE WITH 2 HOOKS

59'-0

" 1'

-0"

17.9

8 0.

3 19

'-6 1

/2"

3 1/

2"

6'-3

" 3

1/2"

9'

-4"

5 1/

2"

21'-0

" 11

" 11

" 0.

28

5.96

0.

09

1.91

0.

09

2.84

0.

14

6.4

0.28

1'

-9 1

/2"

3'-0

" 1'

-5 1

/2"

3'-0

" 3'

-0"

3'-4

" 2'

-0"

3'-0

"16

'-0"

0.28

16

'-0"

1'-9

" 5'

-11

1/2"

3

1/2"

11

'-1 1

/2"

5 1/

2"

21'-0

" 11

" 4.

88

0.53

1.

82

0.09

3.

39

0.14

6.

4 0.

28

3 1/

2"

8'-0

" 0.

09

2.44

59

'-0"

17.9

8

BENCH R22 min. GIRDER C3C3 5'-0" 1.52

7'-0

" 2.

13

SHOWER ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES @24''O/C

MASTER 26 BEDROOM 5 MASTER

F.P. W.I.C.

4.88

Designed by:30" 30" ALI SHAKERI

T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900 L1+

S1

0.61

0.

91

GIRDER C3 60" 5'-0" C3 5'-6"

ELEV. 4'-0" ARCICA INC.

326 SHEPPARD AVENUE EAST,M2N 3B4

TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA

revisions:


12'-5" 1'-9"

L1+S

1 L1

+S1

2'-0

" 4"

2'

-6 3

/4"

6'-0

" 2'

-6 3

/4"

0.61

0.1

0.

78

1.83

0.

78

1.521.68 0.53CL. 3.78

30"

GIR

DER

3'

-6"

8'-4

" 4'

-0 1

/2"

1.07

1.07

30

0.91

0.

44

1.02

1.22

2.54

1.

23

31 2X10 30" @12"

L1+S

1 L1

+S1 3-2x10

0.91

0.

91

11'-1

0 1/

2"

2-2x

10 W D 5 BEDROOM DRAIN

7'-3

1/2

"

1.22

3.

62

GIR

DER

1'

-9"

5'-3

" 5'

-6"

0.53

1.

6 31

2X10

@12

" #4FLOOR

2-2x

10 LAUNDRY

2.22

26 7'-0 1/2"

24"

3'-5 1/2" 1'-9" 1.05 0.53

46"

6'-3

" 1.

91

2.1530 LIN.2'-11" 24"3-2x10 0.89 32'' 30"11' - 0"

17DN 172.59 m 3'-6" 2X10 8'-6" 2.59

11' CLG. 4'

-0"

@12" CL.

0.55

12'-4" 11'-3" SHOWER 3.43GIRDER 3.76 30"30" 30" C3

C3 3'-0" 0.91 3'-6 1/2" 12'-0"

3.66

5'-9

1/2

"1.

77

CL.1.081.68

SHOWER 24" 30" 1 ALL WORK SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN26''

STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE8'-3" 4'-6 1/2" 8'-9 1/2" REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST REVISION OF THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE.

3'-8 1/2"

2.51 1.38 2.68

8'-6 1/2" 2. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO 1.13 2.6 CONSTRUCTION.

3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION SHALL BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON THE JOB AND ANY VARIANCES OR

BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM #3 5 5 #4 5 #2 DISCREPANCIES MUST BE REPORTED TO 26

F&A ASSOCIATES BY PHONE AND SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN CONFIRMATION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE

26 26

13'-9

" 4.

19

WORK. 5. USE ONLY LATEST REVISED DRAWINGS OF THOSE THAT ARE MARKED "ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION".

ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES @24''O/C 6. ALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY CERTIFIED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TOGIRDER C3 C3 CONSTRUCTION

R22 min. 12'-3" 13'-4" 3.73 4.06 project:

106 MUNRO BOULEVARD11"

L1+S1

1'-0

" 0.

3 6'

-0"

1.83

L1+S1 B3+S2 drawing:

2nd FLOOR PLAN1'-5 1/2" 6'-0" 2'-6" 9" 3'-0" 2'-2" 6" 7'-6" 5'-4"

0.44 1.83 0.76 0.23 0.91 0.66 11" 9'-11 1/2" 11" 7'-4" 11"

0.15 2.29 1.63 scale:19'-0 1/2" 11" page:

0.28 3.04 0.28 2.24 0.28 5.8 0.28

3.31 10'-10 1/2"

2.79 9'-2"

31

40'-0" 6.08 19'-11 1/2"

3/16" = 1'-0" A 04

12.19 THIS UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED & TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS DESIGN, & HAS THE QUALIFICATIONS & MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS SET OUT IN THE O.B.C. TO BE A DESIGNER

Ali ShakeriNOTE: ALL INTERIOR WALL BCIN#24574 DIMENSIONS SHOW F&A Associates Ltd. FACE OF STUDS BCIN#30998

0.46 1'-6"

TOTAL ROOF AREA : 2673 S.F. FLAT ROOF AREA : 668.25 S.F. (25%-by-law 7625)

FLAT ROOF AREA : 1336.5 S.F. (50%-by-law 569-2013) 1'-6" 0.46

notes:

1'-6

"

1'-6

" 0.

46

8" / 12"8" / 12" 12" 8" / 12" 8" / 8" / 12" 12"8" / 12" 8" / 8" / 12"

4'-8

"

0.46

0.

46

1.43

16

.05

1.43

TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA

revisions:


42'-1

1"13

.08

41'-5

1/2

" 12

.64

2.0

%

2.0

%

4'-0

" 4'

-8"

1.43

1.

22

4'-8" 33'-7 3/4" 4'-8" STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO1.43 10.26 1.43 CONSTRUCTION

project:

106 MUNRO BOULEVARD

20

" / 1

2"

33'-7 3/4" 10.26 2

.0%

2

0" / 1

2"

2.0%

4'-8" 8'-8" 24'-11 3/4"

2.0

%

4'-8" 1.431.43 2.64 7.61

20" / 12" 14'-6" 12'-1" 3'-1" 4.42 3.68 0.94

LINE OFBUILDING

PERIMETER 2.0% BELOW ROOF

2.0%

Designed by:10.0%

10.0% ALI SHAKERI20" / 12" SKYLIGHT

2'x4' T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900


M2N 3B4

44'-7

3/4

" 13

.61

4'-8

" 52

'-7 3

/4"

SKYLIGHT6'x6' SKYLIGHT

2'x2'

2.0% LINE OF BUILDING

PERIMETERBELOW ROOF10.0% 10.0%

SKYLIGHT2'x2'

PROVIDE ROOF 2.0% VENTS, MIN. 1/300

OF FINISH CEILING AREA, MIN. 50% TO

20" / 12" BE AT ROOF RIDGE SKYLIGHT

2'x2'

1 ALL WORK SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST REVISION OF THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE. 2. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION SHALL BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON THE JOB AND ANY VARIANCES OR DISCREPANCIES MUST BE REPORTED TO F&A ASSOCIATES BY PHONE AND SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN CONFIRMATION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK. 5. USE ONLY LATEST REVISED DRAWINGS OF THOSE THAT ARE MARKED "ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION".20" / 12"2.0% 6. ALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY CERTIFIED

1'-6

" 20" / 12" 20" / 12" 1'

-6"

0.46

drawing:

ROOF PLAN 1'-6" 1'-6" 0.46

scale: page:

3/16" = 1'-0" A 05

THIS UNDERSIGNED HAS REVIEWED & TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS DESIGN, & HAS THE QUALIFICATIONS & MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS SET OUT IN THE O.B.C. TO BE A DESIGNER

Ali Shakeri BCIN#24574 F&A Associates Ltd. BCIN#30998

0.46

FIN. 2ND FL. +172.59

T/BASEMENT SLAB +166.04

FIN. 1ST FL. +168.15

FIN. MAIN FL. +169.24

2ND FL. CLG. +175.49

T/ROOF +176.77

ESTABLISHED GRADE +166.77

UNDER OF SUFFIT +174.27

MID OF THE ROOF +175.57

LOWER BASEMENT +165.46

T/PLATE +175.03

3.2

10'-6

" 3.

35

11'-0

" 2.

9 9'

-6"

14

0.15 6"

0.15

6"

-3' - 7"

0' - 0"

-8' - 1"

-10' - 6"

11' - 0"

16' - 6"

CENTER OF THE ROAD +166.65 -8' - 6"

24' - 8 1/2"

7.5

24'-7

1/4

"

0.3

1'-0

" 0.

46

1'-6

" 1.

83

6'-0

" 0.

46

1'-6

"2.

13

7'-0

"

0.46

1'

-6"

0.61

2'

-0"

3.1 10'-2"

1.68

5'

-6 1

/4"

0.1 4"

1032

'-9 3

/4"

1.3

4'-3

"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.68

5'

-6"

0.53

1'

-9"

0.25 10"

0.25 10"

2.64 8'-8"

0.15 6"

0.15 6" 0.25

10"

0.15 6"0.25

10"

0.15 6"

0.46

1'-6

" 1.

68

5'-6

" 1.

68

5'-6

" 0.

63

2'-0

3/4

"

0.19

7 1/

2"

2.74

9'

-0"

-12' - 5"

1.2

3'-1

1 1/

4"

1.2

3'-1

1 1/

4"

0.15

6"

0.15 6"

2.69

8'-1

0"

30

31

20' - 9"

20' - 6"

19' - 0"

174.27 m

174.37 m

0.46 1'-6"

0.46 1'-6"

1.33

4'-4

1/4

"

15.0%15.0%15.0%

21

17 17

12

15

15

15.0%

1.07

3'

-6"

0.53

1'

-9"

1.68

5'

-6"

0.03

1"

2.

377'

-9 1

/2"

2.0% 2.0%

20"

12"

20"

12"

20"

12"

20"

12"

0.73

2'

-4 3

/4"

0.59

1'

-11

1/4"

0.67

2'

-2 1

/4"

0.66

2'-1

3/4

"

8.92

29

'-3 1

/4"

0.76

2'

-6"

1.52

5'

-0"

MIN

.4'

MIN

.4'

0.15 6"

0.15 6"

0.15 6"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.83

6'

-0"

8.92

29'-3

1/4

"

1 ALL WORK SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST REVISION OF THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE. 2. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND INFORMATION SHALL BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON THE JOB AND ANY VARIANCES OR DISCREPANCIES MUST BE REPORTED TO F&A ASSOCIATES BY PHONE AND SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN CONFIRMATION PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK. 5. USE ONLY LATEST REVISED DRAWINGS OF THOSE THAT ARE MARKED "ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION". 6. ALL STRUCTURAL DESIGN MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY CERTIFIED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION



revisions:

scale:

project:

drawing:

page:

notes:

ALI SHAKERI T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900



Designed by:

1/4" = 1'-0" A 06

MAIN ELEVATION (SOUTH)

106 MUNRO BOULEVARD


FIN. 2ND FL. +172.59


FIN. 1ST FL. +168.15


2ND FL. CLG. +175.49

T/ROOF +176.77





T/PLATE +175.03

31

14

0.46

1'

-6"

1.68

5'

-6"

0.46

1'

-6"

0.46

1'

-6"

2.13

7'

-0"

0.2 8"

1.37

4'

-6"

1.07

3'

-6"

1.37

4'

-6"

1.07

3'

-6"

MIN

.4' 0

.15

6"

7 10

0.15

6"

2.

44

8'-0

"

MIN

.2'

MIN

.2'

0.15 6"

0.15

6"

MIN

.2'M

IN.2

'

0.2 8"

0.15 6"

CENTER OF THE ROAD +166.65

2.9

9'-6

" 3.

35

11'-0

" 3.

2 10

'-6"

MIN

.4'

MIN

.4'

MIN

.4'

31

31

8"

12" 8"

12"

8"

12" 8"

12"

10

32'-9

3/4

"

0.1 4"

1.68

5'-6

1/4

" 0.

03

1"

2.37

7'

-9 1

/2"

20"

12"

14

21

1.52

5'

-0"

1.07

3'

-6"

7.5

24'-7

1/4

" 1.

2 3'

-11

1/4"

1.

2 3'

-11

1/4"

1717

12

15

0.3

11 3

/4"

0.69

2'

-3"

-12' - 5"

-10' - 6"

-8' - 1"

-3' - 7"

0' - 0"

11' - 0"

16' - 6"

24' - 8 1/2"

20' - 9"

19' - 0"

20' - 6"

0.3

1'-0

"

0.2 8"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.68

5'

-6"

0.46 1'-6"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.68

5'

-6"

8"

12" 8"

12" 8"

12"

8"

12"

1.83

6'

-0"

0.46

1'

-6"

174.37 m

174.27 m

20"

12"

2.0% 2.0%

1.8 5'-10 3/4"

2.13 7'-0"

2.13 7'-0"

1.8 5'-10 3/4"

0.59

1'

-11

1/4"

0.

852'

-9 1

/2"

0.59

1'

-11

1/4"

0.

852'

-9 1

/2"

7 10

0.46 1'-6"

31

30

0.46

1'

-6"

1.68

5'

-6"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.68

5'

-6"

-8' - 6"

8.92

29

'-3 1

/4"




revisions:

scale:

project:

drawing:

page:

notes:

ALI SHAKERI T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900



Designed by:

1/4" = 1'-0" A 07

REAR ELEVATION (NORTH)

106 MUNRO BOULEVARD


FIN. 2ND FL. +172.59


FIN. 1ST FL. +168.15


2ND FL. CLG. +175.49

T/ROOF +176.77





T/PLATE +175.03

1.52

5'

-0"

0.91

3'-0

"

0.91

3'-0

" 1.

52

5'-0

"

0.46

1'-6

" 1.

68

5'-6

" 0.

46

1'-6

"

MIN

.4'

2.9

9'-6

" 3.

35

11'-0

" 3.

2 10

'-6"


11' - 0"

0.15 6"

0.19

7

1/2"

3.

5311

'-6 3

/4"

0.91

3'

-0"

2.69

8'

-10"

4.

44

14'-6

3/4

" 2.

9 9'

-6"

31

15

1.68

5'

-6 1

/4"

0.1 4"

2.4

7'-1

0 1/

2"

31

30

DOWN SPOUT

DOWN SPOUT

174.27 m

174.37 m

10

32'-9

3/4

"

7.5

24'-7

1/4

"

1.2

3'-1

1 1/

4"

1.2

3'-1

1 1/

4"

21

12

17 17

24' - 8 1/2"

20' - 9"

20' - 6"

19' - 0"

16' - 6"

-3' - 7"

-12' - 5"

-10' - 6"

-8' - 1"

31

0.3

1'-0

" 0.

511'

-8"

3.93

12

'-10

3/4"

0.2 8"

0.46

1'-6

" 1.

68

5'-6

" 0.

46

1'-6

"

0.2 8"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.68

5'

-6"

0.46

1'

-6"

0.15

6"

0.15 6"

MIN

.4'

1.68

5'-6

" 1.

68

5'-6

" 0.

46

1'-6

"

0.46 1'-6"

1.52

5'-0

" 1.

07

3'-6

"

1.37

4'

-6"

1.07

3'

-6"

0.53

1'

-8 3

/4"

0.92

3'

-0 1

/4"

1.37

4'

-6"

1.07

3'

-6"

20"

12"

20"

12"

2.0%2.0%

0' - 0"

0.46 1'-6"

0.15 6"

0.156"

31

2.28

7'

-5 3

/4"

0.03

1"

2.

377'

-9 1

/2"

31

30

-8' - 6"

8.92

29'-3

1/4

"




revisions:

scale:

project:

drawing:

page:

notes:

ALI SHAKERI T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900



Designed by:

3/16" = 1'-0" A 08

SIDE ELEVATION (WEST)

106 MUNRO BOULEVARD


FIN. 2ND FL. +172.59


FIN. 1ST FL. +168.15


2ND FL. CLG. +175.49

T/ROOF +176.77




GLAZED AREAS: 1. AREA OF EXPOSED BUILDING FACE: 1521.27 SQ.FT. 2. PROPOSED GLAZED AREA:

94.03 SQ.FT. (6.18%)

T/PLATE +175.03

10

32'-9

3/4

"

2.9

9'-6

" 3.

35

11'-0

" 3.

2 10

'-6"


DOWN SPOUT

7.5

24'-7

1/4

"

15

DOWN SPOUT

21

12

171730

24' - 8 1/2"

20' - 9"

20' - 6"

19' - 0"

11' - 0"

-3' - 7"

0' - 0"

-12' - 5"

-10' - 6"

-8' - 1"

31

31

14

14

31

31

31

0.46

1'

-6"

1.68

5'

-6"

0.46

1'

-6"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.83

6'

-0"

0.46

1'

-6"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.83

6'

-0"

0.46

1'

-6"

0.91

3'

-0"

1.52

5'

-0"

0.91

3'

-0"

1.52

5'

-0"

0.46 1'-6"

0.46 1'-6"

0.03

1"

2.

377'

-9 1

/2"

1.2

3'-1

1 1/

4"

1.2

3'-1

1 1/

4"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.83

6'

-0"

20"

12" 20"

12" 2.

28

7'-5

3/4

" 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%2.0%

0.15

6"

MIN

.4'

0.15 6"

0.15 6"

2.13

7'

-0"

7.8

25'-7

1/4

"

0.46

1'

-6"

1.52

5'

-0"

1.07

3'

-6"

0.91

3'

-0"

31 15

0.03

1"

2.

37

7'-9

1/2

"

MAX

.2'

0.2 8"

7 10

MIN

.4'

0.15 6"

0.15

6"

30

30

174.37 m

174.27 m

1.98

6'-6

"

7.8

25'-7

1/4

"

174.57 m 174.57 m

-8' - 6"

8.92

29

'-3 1

/4"

0.15 6"

0.15 6" M

IN.4

'




revisions:

scale:

project:

drawing:

page:

notes:

ALI SHAKERI T: 416 821 3960 F: 416 2508900



Designed by:

3/16" = 1'-0" A 9

SIDE ELEVATION (EAST)

106 MUNRO BOULEVARD


Accessible Decision and Order Template - 106 MunroDECISION AND ORDERappearancesIntroductionMatters in issueJurisdictionEvidenceAnalysis, findings, reasonsDecision and Order

Document - List of ConditionsPages 12-20 from Appellant Disclosure_Plans Revised List of Variances

Date post:	25-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

Decision and Order - Toronto€¦ · DECISION AND ORDER Decision Issue Date Wednesday, July 24,...

Documents