+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

Date post: 08-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: subhash-soni
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 19

Transcript
  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    1/19

    DECISIONDECISION MAKING: AnMAKING: An

    essence to problem solvingessence to problem solvingMeaning of a Decision

    Types of Decisions

    Steps in Rational Decision-Making Models of Decision-Making

    Behavior Environment of Decision-Making

    Common Difficulties in Decision-Making

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    2/19

    DECISIONDECISION:: DMDM isis processprocess byby whichwhich individualsindividuals selectselect aa coursecourse ofof actionaction amongamong alternativesalternatives toto

    produceproduce resultsresults..

    ItIt isis aa processprocess ofof usingusing inputsinputs effectivelyeffectively inin thethe solutionsolution ofof selectedselected problemsproblems && creationcreation

    ofof outputsoutputs thatthat havehave utilityutility..

    AA choicechoice mademade fromfrom availableavailable alternatives,alternatives, ChoiceChoice betweenbetween twotwo oror moremore alternativesalternatives..

    ItIt isis aa keykey partpart ofof managersmanagers activity,activity, toto allocateallocate resourcesresources && accomplishesaccomplishes goalsgoals..

    ToTo decidedecide whatwhat toto dodo onon thethe basisbasis ofof somesome consciousconscious && deliberatedeliberate logiclogic oror judgmentjudgment..

    DecisionDecision requiresrequires wisdomwisdom && experienceexperience toto evaluateevaluate alternativesalternatives..

    ManagersManagers havehave somesome purposepurpose inin mindmind toto makemake decisionsdecisions..

    GoodGood DD MM isis vitalvital forfor goodgood managementmanagement..

    Characteristics of DecisionCharacteristics of Decision--MakingMaking::1. Goal-oriented

    2. Alternatives

    3. Analytical-intellectual

    4. Dynamic process

    5. Pervasive function

    6. Continuous activity7. Commitment of time, effort &

    money.

    8. Human & social process

    9. Integral part of planning

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    3/19

    TYPES OF DECISIONTYPES OF DECISION::

    Programmed decisions-

    Solutions are made in accordance with some policy, rule, procedures.

    Problems are routine & repetitive

    Conditions are highly certain

    Made by lower-level people

    1. Programmed & Non-Programmed Decisions

    Non-Programmed decisions-

    Problems are novel & non-repetitive, unique

    No pre-established policies or procedures, each problem needs creativesolution

    Conditions are highly uncertain.

    Top management responsibility

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    4/19

    2. Major & Minor Decisions

    Relative significance of a decision in four ways:

    1. Degree of Futurity of Decision2. Impact of the Decision on Other Functional Areas

    3. Qualitative Factors that Enter the Decision

    4. Recurrence of Decision

    3. Routine & Strategic Decisions Routine

    Which are supportive, repetitive

    Concerned with short-termcommitment

    Central to companies operations

    Relate to present

    Primary purpose to achieve highdegree of efficiency

    Require little deliberation & money

    Strategic

    Concerning unique problems

    Demanding large investments

    Creativeness & good judgment onthe part of higher level managers

    Affect the future of theorganization

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    5/19

    4. Individual & Group Decisions Individual Decisions

    Taken by individual in their individual capacity.

    These cant be delegated

    Affect the organization in indirect way

    Definite procedure to deal with the problem

    Analysis of variable is simple

    Group Decisions

    Taken by managers as in their formal or official capacity as allocators &controllers, can be delegated

    Aimed at furthering the interests of the organization

    These are strategic & important decisions, result into change in org.

    Result of decisions open for public view.

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    6/19

    Advantages:Increased acceptance bythose affected

    Easier coordinationEasier communicationMore information processed

    Disadvantages:Group decisions take longerGroups can be indecisive

    Groups can compromiseGroups can be dominated

    Approaches to Group Decision Making:Discussion or Interacting GroupNominal Group TechniqueDelphi TechniqueDialectic Method

    Devils Advocacy

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    7/19

    STEPS IN RATIONAL DECISION MAKINGSTEPS IN RATIONAL DECISION MAKING::

    (1)

    Recognizing problems

    (2)

    Deciding priorities

    (3)

    Diagnosing theproblem

    (4)

    Developing AlternativeSolutiuons

    (5)

    Measuring & ComparingConsequences

    (6)

    Decision Implementation& Follow up

    Flow diagram ofthe rationaldecision-making process

    External Environment

    feedback

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    8/19

    1. RECOGNISINGPROBLEMS

    1st search the environment for existence of problem

    When Deviation from past experience

    When Deviation from plans

    When Other people bring problems

    When competitors outerperform

    2. DECIDINGPRIORITIES

    Find some of the problems which can be best solved by subordinates asthey are close to them

    Find problems that need to be referred upward

    Some problems allowed to be solved without any efforts

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    9/19

    3. DIAGNOSING THE PROBLEM

    What is the problem?

    Which problem to solve?

    What is the real cause of problem? symptoms

    4. DEVELOPINGALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS

    - Review the past experiences

    - Scrutinize the practice of others

    Inventors & scientist indicate 5 stages of creative process:

    Must make familiar with the problem- Saturation

    Think problem from several view points- Deliberation

    No fruitful solution, turn-off conscious search & relax- Incubation

    Flash of insight take place & get new ideas- Illumination

    Refines ideas into a usable proposal- Accommodation

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    10/19

    5. MEASURING & COMPARING CONSEQUENCES

    Comparison of the quality & acceptability of various solutions

    Taking in consideration all the consequences

    If information is not available about quality & acceptability advisable toexperiment on small scale i.e. Pilot-testing

    6. DECISION IMPLEMENTATION & FOLLOW UP

    Translate the decision into action

    Requires communication of decisions

    Secure acceptance of decision

    Associate employees in DM to get whole hearted participation & improvequality.

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    11/19

    MODELS OF DECISION-MAKING BEHAVIOUR

    Dev. by classical economist, believed that man is rational being.

    Make search for best alternative for achieving optimum solution to aproblem in planned, orderly & logical manner.

    Gather all necessary information for decision.

    Mentally store the information

    Accurately recall the information

    Do series of complex calculations

    Rank all consequences

    Criticism: lacks realism, not portray how decisions actually made.

    Mgmt. decisions in all areas can be made rationally.

    I. ECONOMIC MAN MODEL

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    12/19

    Assumptions of Rational Decision Making:

    Decision-making is a goal-oriented process

    All choices are known

    Order of preference

    Maximum advantage

    Factors effecting in being perfectly rational:

    Impossible to state the problem accurately

    Not fully aware about problems

    Imperfect knowledge Limited time & resources

    Cognitive limits

    Politics

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    13/19

    II. ADMINISTRATIVE MAN MODEL

    Dev. By Herbert Simon, more realistic description

    Man uses limited rationality because of limited information processingskills.

    Look for the one which is good enough (may promote paralysis byanalysis)

    Administrative man satisfies rather than maximizes

    Not required to search& evaluate to initiate search to find possiblealternative solutions.

    search feasible alternatives one by one, if 1stdo not work search for

    another.

    as soon as workable alternative found, discontinues search

    Search for alternatives is guided by experiences & past records.

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    14/19

    Eight steps in Bounded Rationality Model :

    1. Set the goal , define the problem

    2. Establish criteria to judge the acceptability of a solution

    3. use heuristics & identify a feasible solution

    4. If no feasible solution identified, lower the criteria to judge a7 beginthe search, repeating the step 3.

    5. If feasible solution identified, to determine acceptability

    6. If solution found acceptable, implement it

    7. If solution found unacceptable, initiate search for new solution ,repeating steps 3to 5.

    8. Following implementation, evaluate degree of difficulty, set thecriteria to judge for future decisions of this type

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    15/19

    I. SOCIAL MAN/ POLICAL MODEL

    Dev. by Classical psychologist

    Freud says That man being a bundle of feelings, emotions, instincts isguided by his unconscious desires.

    Decisions also subject to social pressures & influences.

    Strong social pressures forces to choose wrong alternatives

    Decisions cannot be termed as organizationally rational

    Decisions may be sometimes personally rational.

    Useful for non-programmed decisions-

    when conditions are uncertain

    Information is limited

    disagreement among managers about goals & course of actions.

    When the outcomes are not clear, gain support throughnegotiation, discussions & bargaining.

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    16/19

    ENVIRONMENT OF DECISION-MAKING

    The condition of knowledge is referred to as the environment of decision-making

    CERTAINITY-

    - Consequences of particular decision are specified.

    - Conditions associated with alternatives are known to the decision-maker.

    RISK-

    - Consequences not specified with certainty.

    - Decisions has clear goals, incomplete but reliable & factual informationavailable.

    - Future outcomes associated with each outcomes are subject to chance.

    - Evaluation by calculating expected value of the pay off.

    - Objective probabilities derived mathematically from historical data.

    - Subjective probabilities estimated from past experience & judgments.

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    17/19

    UNCERTAINITY-

    - Not known with the probabilities of possible outcomes.

    - Conditions of complete ignorance.

    Three basis that can be used

    Maximin- pessimistic or cautious approach. Choose that decision act thatmaximizes the minimum.

    Minimax- optimistic , choose that decision act which maximizes themaximum

    MinimaxRegret- neither optimistic nor pessimistic.

    AMBIGUITY-

    - Goals & problems are unclear

    - Alternatives are not properly defined

    - Information about outcomes is not available

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    18/19

    COMMON DIFFICULTIES IN DECISION-MAKING

    Incomplete Information

    Unsupporting Environment

    Non-Acceptance by Subordinates

    Ineffective Communication

    Incorrect Timing

  • 8/7/2019 Decision Making(Sess 7-8)

    19/19

    It is better to light a candle, than tocurse the darkness.

    Be a part of solution not a part of problem


Recommended