+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Decision Support

Decision Support

Date post: 22-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: acacia
View: 19 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Decision Support. May 2011. DSS components. Hydrobase GIS data TStool /CDSS tool box StateCU StatePP Modflow . HydroBase. GIS Data (Spatial Data). CDSS Tool Box & StateDGI. TSTool & StateDMI. StateCU. MODFLOW. Decision Support Process. Refinements. New Data Aerial imagery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
13
Decision Support May 2011
Transcript
Page 1: Decision Support

Decision Support

May 2011

Page 2: Decision Support

DSS components

• Hydrobase

• GIS data

• TStool/CDSS tool box

• StateCU

• StatePP

• Modflow.

Page 3: Decision Support

HydroBase

MODFLOW

GIS Data (Spatial Data)

TSTool & StateDMI

CDSS Tool Box & StateDGI

StateCU

Page 4: Decision Support

Deci

sion

Supp

ort P

roce

ssRGDSS GROUNDWATER MODEL WORKSHOP

JANUARY 10-12, 2011 PROCESS/DATA FLOW DIAGRAM

HYDROBASE Basic Water Data

Diversions/Structures Water Rights

Well Info Climate Data

Irrigated Parcels

AGG Aggregates individual ditches

to make the MS and ADW structures

PRISM PRISM Climate Group, Oregon

State University, http:/ /www.prismclimate.org,

created 4 Feb 2004

Historic Runs

Steady State: 1990-1998 Steady State: Average Monthly Initial Period: Steady State 1950-

1969 Transient: 1970-2009

STATEPP – Modified for RGDSS

INPUT: StateCU, StateDGI, AGG, and PRISM OUTPUT: MODFLOW Recharge Packages MODFLOW ET Packages MODFLOW Well Packages MODFLOW Drain Packages

SCALE: Model Cell Time Frame: Model Period Time Step: Monthly RUNS: Historic No Pumping Recharge Decrees General Input Files

NAM File – Names all input files BAS Package - General Setup

BCF Package – Aquifer Parameters DIS Package – Discretization GHB Package – Boundaries

HFB (Horizontal Flow Barrier) Package – Mesita Fault OC Package- Output Control

Solver Package

<

MODFLOW

Stream Package Major Programs

Mkstr: Reads GIS coverage and creates initial network Mkq: Prepares flow files for each stress period Build: Performs data integration MODEx: Produces MODFLOW stream package

GIS DATA (Spatial Data) – ARCVIEW

Ditch Service Areas County, HUC Land Use Aerial & Satellite Imagery Rim Inflow Areas Drains Diversions Model Grid/Layers Climate Stations Soils Stream Gages GW Only Area Boundaries Sprinklers (1975-98) Wells/Irrigated Lands (1936, 1998, 2002, 2005)

SCALE: Parcel Time Frame: Variable

TSTOOL/STATEDMI

Tools for downloading and enhancing data from HydroBase

User/GIS generated lists provide input files

CDSS TOOL BOX & STATEDGI

INPUT: GIS Files OUTPUT: Canal Length Irrigated acreage by ditch Irrigation wells

Irrigated crop for subirrigation Wells assigned to cells/layers

Small flowing wells assigned to cells Rim Inflow Areas assigned to cells Native Vegetation areas Available Water Content SCALE: Parcel/Structure/Model Cell Time Frame: Snapshots (1936, 1998, 2002, 2005) RUNS: One run for each of the snapshot years

MODFATE Iterative program

that estimates fate of surface

water return and drain flows

M&I Well Pumping and Recharge Command Files

Plus Rim Recharge Command File

mksub Program that builds Subdistrict input

files, one for each Subdistrict

Mkrcdwb: Program that creates 3rd dwb file needed for simulating the recharge decrees

<

STATECU PROGRAM

INPUT: RCU file + other files created by DMI’s OUTPUT File (*.DWB):

Canal Losses Non-Consumed SW & GW Effective Precipitation GW Pumping for irrigation Ditch Shortage of subirrigation

IWR for crop subirrigation SCALE: Ditch /Structure TIME FRAME: Model Period TIME STEP: Monthly RUNS: Historic No Pumping

Subdistrict Response Function Runs

1. No Pumping Run: 1970 -2009 (includes recharge decrees ) 2. Historic Response Calibration Data: Transient Historical Run minus No Pumping Run (1970-2009) 3. Annual Response Functions (1988 – 2009) used to derive calibrated Wet, Dry and Average Year

Response Functions. 4. Wet, Dry and Average year responses are combined and adjusted to “calibrate” to the Historic

Response Calibration Data. 5. Calibrated Wet, Dry and Average year response functions used to estimate future pumping

impacts.

Page 5: Decision Support

Refinements

• New Data– Aerial imagery– Pumping information– Cropping information– Geological information– Water User information

• Commitment to continue to refine the model• Phase 4, phase 5, phase 6

Page 6: Decision Support

Imagery

• Original data– 1998 satellite imagery (3)

• New data– 1998 imagery (~27)– 2002– 2005

– More images at better resolution– Used to refine GIS layers

Page 7: Decision Support

Illustrative Example

Illustrative example only. Not from RGDSS modeling effort.

Page 8: Decision Support

Well/Meter Records • Incorporated 2009 pumping data • Reviewed well meter data and other information to assure that pumping from

all non-exempt wells within the model domain are included in the model.

• Refinements to structure lists and multi-structure groupings

• Enhanced methodology to estimate historic pumping that takes into account subirrigaton and regional irrigation practices obtained through interviews with water users and water commissioners

• Refinements to municipal and industrial well pumping estimates

Page 9: Decision Support

Cropping

• Conducted a series of water user and water commissioner interviews to enhance ditch service area representation, well to parcel assignments and local irrigation practices.

• 1998 Irrigated Lands Assessment completed under the same standards utilized from the 2002 and 2005 Irrigated Lands Assessments

• Additional investigation of the extent of meadow/grass pasture actually irrigated

• Added new crop types: cover crops and new alfalfa

• Revisited some crop characteristics, such as planting date and freeze dates, based on water user interviews and recommendations based on Agro Engineering’s experience.

• Refine subirrigation curves based on additional research

Page 10: Decision Support

Geology/Hydrogeology

• investigated the locations of high groundwater tables during irrigation season based on the RGWCD’s water level measurement database

• review all existing well log records for the Conejos/Rio San Antonio area and update the geological parameters of the model based on that review by HRS Water Consultants, Inc.

Page 11: Decision Support
Page 12: Decision Support

User Information

• User experience– In meetings– On the ground

• Updated some canal conveyance efficiencies based on revised canal coverage and interviews with water users and water commissioners

• Farm operations

Page 13: Decision Support

General• “study period” extended through 2009 • refined climate station weights based on local climate information • refinements to diversion records for structures carrying or

receiving water to or from other structures

• update stream inflow and recharge areas with current data

• refinements to stream and drain packages based on GPS data location and additional mapping


Recommended