+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Decision Time

Decision Time

Date post: 30-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: toril
View: 26 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Application of the FDOT Special Use Methodology on an Interstate 75 Project TRB Summer Meeting Williamsburg, VA July 11, 2006 Presented By: Win Lindeman & Mike Mulbarger Environmental Science Associates 1715 N. Westshore Blvd., Suite 780 Tampa, Florida 33607. Decision Time. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
28
Application of the FDOT Special Use Methodology on an Interstate 75 Project TRB Summer Meeting Williamsburg, VA July 11, 2006 Presented By: Win Lindeman & Mike Mulbarger Environmental Science Associates 1715 N. Westshore Blvd., Suite 780 Tampa, Florida 33607
Transcript
Page 1: Decision Time

Application of the FDOT Special Use Methodology on an Interstate 75 Project

TRB Summer Meeting Williamsburg, VA

July 11, 2006

Presented By:

Win Lindeman & Mike Mulbarger Environmental Science Associates1715 N. Westshore Blvd., Suite 780

Tampa, Florida33607

Page 2: Decision Time

Decision Time

Page 3: Decision Time

Special Use Location Methodology

Page 4: Decision Time

Location Map

Page 5: Decision Time

PD&E Phase Noise Study Report

Page 6: Decision Time

Three Oaks Community Park

I-75

Page 7: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier Number in feet

2 Height of proposed barrier Number in feet

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 Number in ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

Number in hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

Number of people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5 Number of person-hours

7 Divide item 3 by item 6 Number in ft2/person-hour

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7 Amount in $

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

Yes/No

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable √

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable √

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00) Amount in $

Page 8: Decision Time

Sample of Park Usage Information

Three Oaks Field Usage January-December

*p.m. usage starts after 6:00pm

Field Usage for January

Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday ThursdayFrida

y SaturdayUsag

e

a.m usage 150 60 60 100 60 60 450 940

*p.m. usage 75 450 450 450 450 450 150 2475

Average Weekly Total= 3415

          Average Monthly Total=   13660

Page 9: Decision Time

Receiver Array

Page 10: Decision Time

Proposed Barrier Location

Page 11: Decision Time

Recommended Noise Barrier

Barrier

Location

Barrier Length (feet)

Barrier Height (feet)

Barrier Stations

Average Noise

Reduction

Total Estimated

Cost

Three Oaks Community

Park

2,740 18 682+10 to

709+50

7.7 $1,233,000

Page 12: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5

7 Divide item 3 by item 6

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 13: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier 18 ft

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5

7 Divide item 3 by item 6

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 14: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier 18 ft

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5

7 Divide item 3 by item 6

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 15: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier 18 ft

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5

7 Divide item 3 by item 6

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 16: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier 18 ft

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

1139 people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5

7 Divide item 3 by item 6

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 17: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier 18 ft

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

1139 people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5 2897.5 person-hr

7 Divide item 3 by item 6

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 18: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier 18 ft

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

1139 people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5 2897.5 person-hr

7 Divide item 3 by item 6 17.0 ft2/person-hr

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 19: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier 18 ft

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

1139 people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5 2897.5 person-hr

7 Divide item 3 by item 6 17.0 ft2/person-hr

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7 $595,000

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 20: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier 18 ft

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

1139 people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5 2897.5 person-hr

7 Divide item 3 by item 6 17.0 ft2/person-hr

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7 $595,000

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

No

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 21: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

1139 people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5 2897.5 person-hr

7 Divide item 3 by item 6 17.0 ft2/person-hr

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7 $595,000

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

No

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable √

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 22: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

1139 people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5 2897.5 person-hr

7 Divide item 3 by item 6 17.0 ft2/person-hr

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7 $595,000

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

No

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable √

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable N/A

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00)

Page 23: Decision Time

Reasonableness Matrix for Three Oaks Community Park Noise Barrier

Item Criteria Input Units1 Length of proposed barrier 2,740 ft

2 Height of proposed barrier

3 Multiply item 1 by item 2 49,320 ft2

4 Average amount of time that a person stays at the site per visit

2.5 hours

5 Average number of people that use this site per day that will receive at least 5 dBA benefit from abatement at this site

1139 people

6 Multiply item 4 by item 5 2897.5 person-hr

7 Divide item 3 by item 6 17.0 ft2/person-hr

8 Multiply $35,000 by item 7 $595,000

9 Does item 8 exceed the “abatement cost factor” of $711,382/person-hr/ ft2?

No

10 If item 9 is no, abatement is reasonable √

11 If item 9 is yes, abatement is not reasonable N/A

12 Estimated cost of the barrier (multiply item 3 by $25.00) $1,233,000

Page 24: Decision Time

Public Involvement Steps with Lee County

• Obtain Park Usage Information

• Met with Park and County Officials

• Solicited Input on Color, Texture and Landscaping

Page 25: Decision Time

Public Involvement Results

• The barrier was favored by Lee County

• The color selected was Dark Beige

• The texture selected was Ashlar Stone with smooth horizontal band and smooth posts

• Landscaping was encouraged, to include Creeping Fig

Page 26: Decision Time

Barrier Aesthetics Selected

Page 27: Decision Time

Conclusions

• A wide array of receiver points are required

• Single-use facilities rarely qualify for abatement

• Usage data can be difficult to obtain

• The methodology is relatively simple to apply

Page 28: Decision Time

Any Questions?

• When’s the break?• When’s lunch??• Are you done yet???


Recommended