Decommissioning,
Decontamination and
Demolition of the Macau Power
Station
Executive Summary (English) –
Environmental Impact Assessment
3 August 2016
Environmental Resources Management 16/F, Berkshire House
25 Westlands Road
Quarry Bay, Hong Kong
Telephone 2271 3000
Facsimile 2723 5660
www.erm.com
ERM consulting services worldwide www.erm.com
Decommissioning, Decontamination
and Demolition of the Macau Power
Station
Executive Summary (English) – Environmental Impact
Assessment
Document Code: 0346562 EIA Executive Summary (English) Cover and
Flysheet.docx
Environmental Resources
Management
16/F Berkshire House
25 Westlands Road
Quarry Bay
Hong Kong
Telephone: (852) 2271 3000
Facsimile: (852) 2723 5660
E-mail: [email protected]
http://www.erm.com
客戶 :
Companhia de Electricidade de Macau
GMS No:
0346562
內容摘要: 日期:
3 August 2016
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study for the proposed
Decommissioning, Decontamination and Demolition of the Macau
Power Station. The EIA Study covers impacts on air quality, noise,
land contamination, water quality, waste management, and ecology.
Recommendations on appropriate mitigation measures have been
given.
審批:
Frank Wan
Partner
Revision Description Prepared Checked Approve Date
1 Executive Summary (English) – Environmental Impact Assessment MTO MTO FWan 3 Aug 16
This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk.
This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of ‘ERM Hong-Kong, Limited’, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client.
We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above.
This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk.
傳閱
內部
公開
保密
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND 1
1.2 EIA STUDY 1
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2
2.1 SCOPE AND NATURE OF THE PROJECT 2
2.2 SITE LOCATION AND BRIEF SITE HISTORY 2
2.3 DEMOLITION PLAN 2
2.4 TENTATIVE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME 3
3 SUMMARY OF EIA FINDINGS 5
3.1 AIR QUALITY 5
3.2 NOISE 5
3.3 LAND CONTAMINATION 6
3.4 WATER QUALITY 8
3.5 WASTE MANAGEMENT 9
3.6 ECOLOGY 9
4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS 10
5 CONCLUSION 11
1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Companhia de Electricidade de Macau (CEM) is the operator of the Macau Power
Station (CMC or the “Project Site”) since the power supply concessions in
1985. Figure 1.1 shows the location of the CMC. The CMC, with a
generation capacity of about 64MW, has been in service for over 30 years and
the generation units have already exceeded their design life. CMC is now
mainly used as a source of back-up capacity due to its low efficiency. In
addition, there are also some old diesel-fired generation units on-site which
are currently out of services.
As the Macau’s economy continues to grow rapidly, there is a high demand of
land for public housing development. In 2012, the Government of Macau
Special Administrative Region (MSAR Government) informed CEM that it
would like CEM to decommission the CMC and return the concession land to
the government for public housing development. In response to the
government’s initiatives, CEM proposes to undertake the Decommissioning,
Decontamination and Demolition (DDD) of the CMC (hereafter referred to as
the Project).
1.2 EIA STUDY
In accordance with the list of designated projects for the administrative
environmental impact assessment (EIA) framework《需進行環境影響評估的
工程項目類別清單》(試行), this Project is classified as a Designated Project
under Item 3–Public utility electricity power plant of Part II–
Decommissioning Projects and therefore an EIA should be undertaken.
ERM-Hong Kong, Limited (ERM) is commissioned by CEM to undertake an
EIA Study for the Project in accordance with Guidelines for Preparation of
Environmental Impact Assessment Report (編寫環境影響評估報告書指引)(2014年
版) published by the Environmental Protection Bureau (DSPA).
This is the Executive Summary of the EIA Report, which describes the nature of
the Project, potential environmental impacts associated with the DDD works
and the key findings and recommendations of the EIA Study.
2
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 SCOPE AND NATURE OF THE PROJECT
The Project includes DDD of the CMC and the off-site oil pipelines between
CMC and the pier located at Avenida da Amizade. General layout plan of the
CMC is given in Figure 2.1.
2.2 SITE LOCATION AND BRIEF SITE HISTORY
The Project Site is located at the junction of Avenida de Venceslau de Morais and
Rua dos Pescadores and surrounded by mixed of industrial/commercial
buildings and residential developments in the northern part of the Macau
Peninsula (see Figure 1.1). The surrounding environment of the Project Site is
shown in Figure 2.2.
Before CEM took over the operation of the CMC, the site has been used for
power generation for over 70 years. The development of CMC can be
described in four stages as presented in Table 1.
Table 1 Historical and Existing Generators
Stage Engines Years of Installation Status
1 D1 - D8 1905 - 1933 Already demolished and removed from Project
Site
2 D9 – D14 1933 - 1962 Already demolished and removed from Project
Site
3 D15 – D21 1964 - 1971 Out of service, still remain on Project Site
T22, T23 1973 Not operating, for back-up and emergency
service only (15.12 MW each)
T24 1973 Already demolished and removed from Project
Site
4 D25 – D28 1983 Not operating, for back-up and emergency
service only (8.48 MW each)
2.3 DEMOLITION PLAN
A conceptual demolition approach and sequence have been developed by
experienced DDD specialists. The demolition works will be carried out in 12
demolition zones (A to L) as listed in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 2.3. It
should be noted that the DDD works will be implemented by appointment of
a DDD Main Contractor who will undertake the detailed design of the DDD
works. The mitigation measures recommended in this EIA Study will be
included in the specification and the findings of the EIA Study will be
developed into environmental performance requirements for the DDD
Contract.
3
Table 2 Demolition Zones
Zone Description Details of Demolition Works
Zone A Tank Farm Fuel oil tank Nos. 1 – 5, including all
piping and retention wall, but
excluding the foundation of the tanks,
underground piping and cabling
Zone B Oily Water System, Chemical Store &
Water Tank No. A1
All facilities inside the room
Zone C Fuel Oil Treatment Plant All facilities inside the building,
including oil storage and gas and
combustive material storage
Zone D Exhaust Gas Stack and Chimneys Exhaust Gas Stack (including facilities
inside the basement) and chimneys
outside from the engine room up to
the top of the stack, and also including
the supporting frame of the exhaust
Zone E Auxiliary Boiler, Fire Fighting Station,
Pumps & Compressors
All facilities inside the room,
including Auxiliary Boiler, Fire
Fighting Station, Cooling Tower,
Pumps & Compressors
Zone F Gas Turbines Packages T22 & T23 Including adjacent facilities, such as
panels and earthing cubicles
Zone G Cooling Tower & Shelter Storage Area Various cooling towers on the Project
Site
Zone H On-Site Cable & Pipe Trenches All cables and pipes buried in
trenches located on the Project Site
Zone I Fuel Oil, Lube Oil & Diesel Oil Pipe Pipes, tracing from the pier to the
Project site
Zone J D25/D28 New Engine Building All facilities inside the building
Zone K D15/D21 Old Engine Building All facilities inside the building
Zone L CMC Control Building All facilities inside the building
2.4 TENTATIVE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
The preliminary project implementation programme is described in Table 3.
Table.2 Preliminary Project Implementation Programme
Stage Time
Stage 1 – Preparation April to July 2016 - EIA study and Pre-DDD preparation, eg
building services investigation.
Stage 2 - Implementation May to September 2016 – procurement arrangements for the
DDD Contract.
July to November 2016 – removal of Asbestos Containing
Materials (ACM) by a qualified Asbestos Contractor and
removal of majority of the plant and equipment by CEM
maintenance contractor.
November 2016 to October 2017 (a) – demolition of the above
ground structures and the remaining plant and equipment.
4
Stage Time
Note:
(a) This is assumed that 2 active demolition zones will be undertaken at the same time. This
duration can be shortened (by about 3 months to July 2017) by increasing the number of
active demolition zones from 2 to 3 at the same time. The key environmental impact
associated with this option will be noise impact, which has been addressed in the noise
impact assessment.
5
3 SUMMARY OF EIA FINDINGS
3.1 AIR QUALITY
The potential air quality impacts (potential release of asbestos fibres and dust)
associated with the DDD works have been evaluated. The removal,
handling, storage, transportation and disposal of asbestos containing materials
(ACM) will be undertaken in accordance to relevant guidelines published by
the DSPA and Hong Kong SAR Government in order to avoid release of
asbestos fibres to the atmosphere.
Fugitive dust may be generated during the demolition of the concrete
buildings and structures within the Project Site boundary, as well as from
temporary stockpile of excavated soil and dusty materials on site. It is not
anticipated that the removal of about 760m long above-ground section of the
oil pipelines between CMC and the oil jetty east to the Macau Reservoir will
cause adverse air quality impact. With the implementation of the
recommended dust mitigation measures and good construction site practices,
potential fugitive dust emissions will be minimised and unacceptable dust
impacts to the identified air sensitive receivers (see Figure 3.2) is not
anticipated.
Regular dust monitoring and site audits will be carried out during the
demolition works to confirm that the recommended mitigation measures are
properly implemented and verify the findings of the EIA Study.
3.2 NOISE
The DDD works will be carried out during day-time (i.e. 08:00 - 20:00 hrs) on
Monday through Saturday. Powered mechanical equipment will be used for
the DDD works which have the potential to cause noise impact to the noise
sensitive receivers (NSRs) in the vicinity of the Project Site.
A detailed construction noise impact assessment has been undertaken to
predict the noise levels at the representative NSRs (see Figure 4.2) due to the
DDD works. As there are no noise criteria for general construction works
under the Law No.8/2014 - Prevention and Control of Environmental Noise.
Reference has been made to the construction noise assessment criteria
stipulated in the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact
Assessment Process (EIAO-TM) issued under Environmental Impact
Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) published by Environmental Protection
Department of Hong Kong SAR Government. Potential noise impacts arising
from general construction works during normal working hours (ie 08:00 to
20:00 hrs on any day not being a Sunday or public holiday under Law
No.8/2014) at the openable windows of buildings were assessed based on the
noise assessment criteria presented in Table 4.
6
Table 3 Assessment Criteria for General Construction Works other than Percussive
Piling
Sensitive Use Noise Standards (dB(A))
� Domestic Premises 75 dB(A) (30min)
� Educational Institutions including nurseries 70 dB(A) (30min)
� Educational Institutions (during examination periods) 65 dB(A) (30min)
Note:
(a) Reference to Table 1B of the EIAO-TM.
Good construction site practice and noise management have been
recommended to reduce the potential construction noise impact on the
identified NSRs. With the use of practical noise mitigation measures, there
are exceedances (by about 1 dB to 19 dB) of the referenced construction noise
assessment criteria during the day-time period at some of the representative
NSRs due to their close proximity to the Project Site. The impacts have been
minimised with exhausting all practical direct noise mitigation measures,
including the use of temporary movable noise barriers and scheduling of
active zones. Residual impacts are considered temporarily and reversible.
Regular site audits of the DDD works and regular noise monitoring at the
identified NSRs will be carried out to ensure the recommended mitigation
measures are properly implemented and evaluate their effectiveness. In
addition, CEM will facilitate communications with concerned parties on the
residual impacts during the DDD works.
3.3 LAND CONTAMINATION
The historical land uses and operation of the CMC have the potential to cause
land contamination at the Project Site. The potential human health risk
associated with the management of potential contaminated soil and
groundwater which may be encountered during the DDD works have been
evaluated.
Currently, Macau has no locally-derived soil and groundwater contamination
or clean-up standards. In view of the similarity in the physical setting,
development history and land-use framework between Macau and Hong
Kong, and also the fact that groundwater is not abstracted for beneficial uses
in both Macau and Hong Kong, the Risk-Based Remediation Goals (RBRGs)
developed by Environmental Protection Department of the Hong Kong SAR
Government were used for the assessment. As the CMC site will be
subsequently used for public housing development, the criteria for Urban
Residential land use stipulated under the RBRGs were adopted as the
assessment criteria.
As part of the EIA Study, a desktop review, site inspections and interviews
with the operation staff of CMC have been undertaken to identify potential
sources of soil and/or groundwater contamination due to past and present
7
operations at the Project Site. The review identified data gaps for the
assessment and the potential land contamination hotspots. A preliminary
Site Investigation (SI) programme was conducted at the 12 identified hotspots
which were accessible during the EIA Study. A total of 30 soil samples and
11 groundwater samples were collected. All soil and groundwater samples
were analysed by a HOKLAS accredited laboratory for the Chemicals of
Concern (CoC) as stated in the RBRGs. The results obtained from the SI
programme were used for the land contamination assessment.
Among the 30 soil samples and 11 groundwater samples collected, the
concentrations of the CoC of all samples complied with the RBRGs except for
the following samples. The soil sample collected at 2.5m below ground level
(bgl) from Borehole BH4 was found to exceed the RBRGs with respect to the
Arsenic criterion. The soil sample collected at 3.0m bgl from Borehole BH2,
was found to exceed the soil saturation limit (Csat) for petroleum carbon range
(PCR), C17 -C35. Three groundwater samples collected from Boreholes BH2,
BH4 and BH6 were found to exceed the solubility limit for PCR C17-C35. One
groundwater sample collected from Borehole BH10 was found to exceed the
RBRGs for PCR C17–C35, the solubility limit for PCR C9-C16, C17–C35 and
Chrysene. After demolition of the existing buildings and structures at the
Project Site, further SI will be carried out at those areas which are not
accessible during the EIA Study. The findings of the further SI will be
presented in a Supplementary Contamination Assessment Report for submission
to DSPA.
Based on the findings of the preliminary SI, the total volume of impacted soil
is estimated between 5,860 and 7,500 m3. The volume of contaminated soil
will be updated after the completion of the further SI. The actual
contamination extent and volume of these impacted soil areas will be
determined by a combination of field assessments (ie checking of signs of
stained soil with petroleum products and the present of odour; and scanning
of the soil using a photoionisation detector) during excavation of the Project
Site, and confirmatory sampling and testing to determine whether the soils are
compliance with the land contamination criteria after the buildings are
demolished.
In general, when the RBRGs are exceeded, it triggers the needs of remediation
so as to mitigate the health risk future land users. As groundwater is not
utilised for beneficial uses in Macau, the risk of exposure of the future users
(residents of the public housing development) to contaminated groundwater
is considered low. However, the risk to the construction workers for the
public housing development is considered high. Recommended remediation
methods for the contaminated soil and groundwater have been outlined,
which will be updated based on the findings of the further SI. After that a
Remediation Action Plan (RAP) will be submitted to DSPA for review.
The DDD works will mainly involve above-ground works and hence the
potential exposure of PCR to the site workers will be low. If groundwater is
needed to be pumped to facilitate the demolition works, the groundwater will
be tested to confirm that it complies with the discharge standards to the sewer.
8
If pollutant concentrations exceeded the discharge standards, the
groundwater will be treated prior to discharge.
Considering the programming constraints and the fact that the impacted soil
layers are relatively thin and near the surface, source removal by excavation of
the impacted soil for off-site treatment (even though the soil PCR
concentrations are within RBRGs) is regarded as the most effective way of
groundwater clean-up at the Project Site and to avoid or minimise potential
impact to construction workers of the public housing development and future
residents of the development. After removal of the impacted soil layer
(which is likely the sources of the groundwater contamination), it is expected
that the groundwater quality will be improved. The excavated soils which
exceeded the RBRGs for Industrial land use or the Soil Saturation Limit
(whichever the lower) will be treated off-site before disposal at the
Construction Waste Landfill per DSPA’s requirement. After the remediation
works, a Remediation Report will be prepared and submitted to DSPA.
In addition, precautionary and mitigation measures have been recommended
to minimise the impact to construction workers during the DDD works,
subsequent construction of the housing development and the future land
users.
To ensure that the recommended mitigation measures are properly
implemented and the DDD works will not cause secondary land
contamination, regular site inspections and verification sampling and testing
of the remediated soils and groundwater to be discharged from the Project
Site will be carried out. The potential impacts due to management of
potential contaminated soil and groundwater that may be encountered from
the Project Site are considered acceptable with the implementation of the
recommended mitigation measures.
3.4 WATER QUALITY
The potential water quality impacts associated with the DDD works have been
evaluated. Water bodies within the Study Area and potentially polluting
activities from the Project have been identified. The potential water quality
impacts from the Project have been assessed with respect to the applicable
criteria.
Potential sources of water quality impact during the DDD works include
construction site runoff, wastewater from decontamination of plant and
equipment, contaminated groundwater from dewatering (if necessary), and
sewage from demolition workforce. Potential water quality impacts for each
potential source of impact have been evaluated and appropriate mitigation
measures have been considered to minimise the identified impacts. With the
implementation of the recommended control measures, it is anticipated that
the Project will not cause unacceptable water quality impacts on the nearby
water bodies. Regular site audits during the DDD works will be carried out
to ensure the proper implementation of the proposed mitigation measures.
9
3.5 WASTE MANAGEMENT
The types (including construction and demolition materials, surplus
excavated soil, chemical waste (including asbestos waste) and general waste)
and quantities of waste to be generated during the DDD works have been
identified and estimated as far as practicable. The potential impacts
associated with handling, storage and disposal of these wastes have also been
evaluated. Analysis of waste management implications involving the
consideration of DDD methods and programme was conducted at the early
stage of the Project to try to reduce waste generation and to maximise
opportunities for reuse and recycling of waste from the DDD activities.
Waste segregation will be carried out as far as practicable so as to maximise
the quantity of materials to be recycled and disposal of the wastes at the
appropriate waste treatment or disposal facilities. With the implementation
of good site practices and recommended waste management arrangements,
the DDD activities will not cause adverse waste management or
environmental impacts. Regular site audits during the DDD works will be
carried out to ensure the proper implementation of the proposed mitigation
measures.
3.6 ECOLOGY
As the DDD works will be carried out mainly within the Project Site and along
the of the oil pipelines between the CMC and the off-site jetty, which are
located in an urban/disturbed area of low ecological value, the potential
ecological impacts are considered low. The removal of the pipelines is not
expected to affect any trees and overall the ecological impacts are negligible.
One bat species of conservation importance was recorded roosting within the
landscaped areas of the Project Site and a different insectivorous species was
observed foraging there at night during the baseline ecological survey. The
trees (particularly the Chinese Fan-palms Livistona chinensis) within the Project
Site will be transplanted or felled prior to the DDD works, which have the
potential to impact on the bats. Given that alternative roosting and foraging
sites for these species have been identified in the habitats that are in close
proximity to the Project Site, the potential impact to the bats due to lose the
landscape area will be minimal.
It is recommended that prior to the removal or felling of the trees at the Project
Site, the concerned trees will be inspected to confirm that no Short-nosed Fruit
Bat is present. If any Short-nosed Fruit Bat is observed roosting on tree, tree
felling/removal works will be postponed until the bats have left. With the
implementation of recommended control measure, the unacceptable
ecological impact due to the DDD works is expected. Regular site audits
during the DDD works will be carried out to ensure the proper
implementation of the proposed mitigation measures..
10
4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
To confirm effective and timely implementation of the mitigation measures
recommended in the EIA Report, an Environmental Monitoring and Audit
(EM&A) programme has been developed by which the implementation of the
recommended mitigation measures can be tracked and checked, and their
effectiveness can be verified.
During the DDD works, regular site inspections and audits will be conducted
to confirm that recommended mitigation measures have been properly
implemented.
Regular dust (in terms of 24-hour averaged Respiratory Suspended
Particulates) and noise monitoring will be carried out at the representative
sensitive receivers; and testing of the groundwater to be discharged to the
sewer will be carried out in order to monitor the environmental performance
of the DDD works and to confirm compliance with the regulatory
requirements or assessment criteria.
Further SI will be conducted at the identified land contaminated hotspots that
cannot be accessed during the EIA Study upon completion of the demolition
of structures and buildings in the concerned areas to confirm any soil and/or
groundwater contamination. The extent of the soil and groundwater
contamination estimated in the EIA Report will be reviewed based on the
findings of the further SI. With necessary, the RAP will be updated. Upon
completion of the remediation works, the remediation works and results will
be presented in the Remediation Report which will be submitted to DSPA for
review.
11
5 CONCLUSION
The implementation of this Project is in line with the MSAR Government’s
policy objective of optimising land use on the crowded Macau peninsula.
With the implementation of recommended good construction site practices
and mitigation measures, no adverse residual impacts due to the Project are
envisaged.
This EIA Study has therefore confirmed the overall acceptability of the
environmental impacts likely to arise due to the DDD works. An
environmental monitoring and audit (EM&A) programme (including regular
environmental monitoring and site audit) will be implemented to verify the
impacts predicted of the EIA Study and to ensure the recommended mitigation
measures are properly implemented by the Project Proponent.
File: T:\GIS\CONTRACT\0346562\Mxd\EIA\0346562_Project_Location.mxdDate: 28/4/2016
Legend
Surface Pipeline
Underground Pipeline
Project Boundary
0 200100Meters
´
Figure 1.1
Project Location
FILE: 0346562eDATE: 28/04/2016General Layout of the Power Plant
Figure 2.1
N
Zone L
Zone K
Zone J
Zone H
Zone H
Zone H
Zone H
Zone G
Zone G
Zone G
Zone G
Zone F
Zone F
Zone E
ZoneE
Zone E
ZoneD
Zone C
Zone B
Zone B
Zone A
File: T:\GIS\CONTRACT\0346562\Mxd\EIA\0346562_Demolition_Zones.mxdDate: 28/4/2016
Legend
CMC Site Boundary
0 5025Meters´
Figure 2.3
Demolition Zones
Zone I
Zone I
Overview of Zone I
Zone DescriptionZone A Tank FarmZone B Oily Water System, Chemical Store & Water Tank No.A1Zone C Fuel Oil Treatment PlantZone D Exhaust Gas Stack and Chimneys
Zone EAuxiliary Boiler, Fire Fighting Station, Pumps next to thisBuilding and Compressors behind this Building
Zone F Gas Turbines Packages T22 and T23Zone G Cooling Tower & Sheltered Storage AreaZone H Cable and Pipe TrenchesZone I Fuel Oil Pipe, Lube Oil Pipe and Diesel Oil PipeZone J D25/D28 Engine RoomZone K D15/D21 Engine RoomZone L Control Building
Jardim DaMontanha Russa
螺螺螺螺螺
MacaoDaily News澳澳澳澳
EdificioAir Way飛飛飛飛
Edificio IndustrialNam Fong
南南南南飛飛
EdificioIndustrial Fu Tai富飛南南飛飛
Edificio Hantec亨亨飛飛
Escola Seono Fan DaAssociacao Comercial
De Macau商商商商商
EnvironmentalProtection Bureau
環環環環環Edificio
Golden Sea金金金螺
EdificioDragon Tower
龍龍龍
EdificioChan Chu珍珍龍
Edificio OK Garden好好金螺
Museu dasComunicacoes飛通通通通
Edificio DosCorreios
郵郵郵郵郵郵郵商郵
Reception area of theTransport Bureau交飛交交環飛交
Edificio Hoi Van海海飛飛
Edificio Ocean Garden海海金螺
Edificio PatTat Sun Chuen
八亨八八
EscolaSao Paulo聖環聖商聖
Edificio IndustrialNam Fong
南南南南飛飛
EdificioIndustrial Fu Hang
富富南南飛飛
EdificioAir Way飛飛飛飛
EdificioIndustrial Chun Foc
景景南南飛飛
Edificio IndustrialNam Leng
南南南南飛飛
Posto Operacionalda Areia Preta
黑黑環黑黑環黑黑黑黑
Nam Wa SanChun
南南八八
Tong WaSan Chun東南八八
JardimNam Ou南澳金螺
EdificioFok Hoi景海金螺
Colegio DomBosco (Yuet Wah)鮑鮑鮑鮑南鮑商
Edificio Obradas Maes母母母飛飛
EdificioKin Chit建建金螺
Edificio IndustrialCheong Long昌龍南南飛飛
EscolaHou Kong濠濠商商
File: T:\GIS\CONTRACT\0346562\Mxd\EIA\0346562_Surrounding_Environment.mxdDate: 11/7/2016
Legend
CMC Site Boundary
0 10050Meters´
Figure 2.2
Surrounding Environment of the Power Plant Site
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
ASR10
ASR11
ASR12
ASR13
ASR14
EdificioIndustrial
Nam Fong南南南南南南
Escola Seono FanDa AssociacaoComercial De
Macau商商商商商
Jardim DaMontanha Russa
螺螺螺螺螺
MacaoDaily News澳澳澳澳
EdificioAir Way飛飛南南
EdificioIndustrial Fu Tai富南南南南南
Edificio Hantec亨亨南南
EnvironmentalProtection Bureau
環環環環環EdificioGolden Sea金金金螺
EdificioDragon Tower
龍龍龍
Edificio ChanChu
珍珍龍
EdificioO K Garden好好金螺
Museu dasComunicacoes飛通通通通
Edificio DosCorreios
郵郵郵郵郵郵郵商郵
Reception area ofthe Transport Bureau
交飛交交環南交
Edificio Hoi Van海海南南
EdificioOcean Garden
海海金螺
Edificio PatTat Sun Chuen
八亨八八
EscolaSao Paulo聖環聖商聖
Edificio IndustrialNam Fong
南南南南南南
EdificioIndustrial Fu Hang
富富南南南南
EdificioAir Way飛飛南南
Edificio IndustrialChun Foc
景景南南南南
Edificio IndustrialNam Leng
南南南南南南
Posto Operacionalda Areia Preta
黑黑環黑黑環黑黑黑黑
Nam WaSan Chun南南八八
Tong WaSan Chun東南八八
JardimNam Ou南澳金螺
EdificioFok Hoi景海金螺
Colegio DomBosco (Yuet Wah)鮑鮑鮑鮑南鮑商
Edificio Obradas Maes母母母南南
EdificioKin Chit建建金螺
Edificio IndustrialCheong Long昌龍南南南南
Escola HouKong
濠濠商商
Edificio IndustrialChong Fong商中南南南南
NovelCentre
Ocean IndustrialCentre (I & II)
海金南南商郵(1期郵2期
AdvancePlaza
先先先先
EdificioIndustrial Veng Hou
永好南南南南
Edificio IndustrialKin Va
建南南南南南
Edificio IndustrialSun Cheong信昌南南南南
Bai YunGarden白白金螺
Escola ChongTak De Macau澳澳商澳商聖
EdificioMarbela海景海螺
ASR1
ASR2
ASR3
ASR4
ASR5
ASR6ASR7
ASR8
ASR9
ASR15
File: T:\GIS\CONTRACT\0346562\Mxd\EIA\0346562_RASR.mxdDate: 11/7/2016
Legend
!( Representative Air Sensitive Receivers (ASRs)
Surface Pipeline
Underground Pipeline
CMC Site Boundary
0 10050Meters
´
Figure 3.2
Locations of Representative Air Sensitive Receivers (ASRs)
Ç
ÇÇ
Ç
Ç
ÇÇ
Ç
Ç
Ç
NSR8
NSR9
NSR10
Creche 1 Da AssociacaoDas Mulheres De Macau
婦婦婦婦婦婦婦
EdificioIndustrial
Nam Fong南南南南南南
Escola Seono FanDa AssociacaoComercial De
Macau商商商商商
Jardim DaMontanha Russa
螺螺螺螺螺
MacaoDaily News澳澳澳澳
EdificioAir Way飛飛南南
EdificioIndustrial Fu Tai富南南南南南
Edificio Hantec亨亨南南
EnvironmentalProtection Bureau
環環環環環Edificio
Golden Sea金金金螺
EdificioDragon Tower
龍龍龍
Edificio ChanChu
珍珍龍
EdificioO K Garden好好金螺
Museu dasComunicacoes飛通通通通
Edificio DosCorreios
郵郵郵郵郵郵郵商郵
Reception area ofthe Transport Bureau
交飛交交環南交
Edificio Hoi Van海海南南
EdificioOcean Garden
海海金螺
Edificio PatTat Sun Chuen
八亨八八
EscolaSao Paulo聖環聖商聖
Edificio IndustrialNam Fong
南南南南南南
EdificioIndustrial Fu Hang
富富南南南南
EdificioAir Way飛飛南南
Edificio IndustrialChun Foc
景景南南南南
Edificio IndustrialNam Leng
南南南南南南
Posto Operacionalda Areia Preta
黑黑環黑黑環黑黑黑黑
Nam WaSan Chun南南八八
Tong WaSan Chun東南八八
JardimNam Ou南澳金螺
EdificioFok Hoi景海金螺
Colegio DomBosco (Yuet Wah)鮑鮑鮑鮑南鮑商
Edificio Obradas Maes母母母南南
EdificioKin Chit建建金螺
Edificio IndustrialCheong Long昌龍南南南南
Escola HouKong
濠濠商商
Edificio IndustrialChong Fong商中南南南南
NovelCentre
Ocean IndustrialCentre (I & II)
海金南南商郵(1期郵2期
AdvancePlaza
先先先先
EdificioIndustrial Veng Hou
永好南南南南
Edificio IndustrialKin Va
建南南南南南
Edificio IndustrialSun Cheong信昌南南南南
Bai YunGarden白白金螺
Escola ChongTak De Macau澳澳商澳商聖
EdificioMarbela海景海螺
NSR1NSR2
NSR3
NSR4NSR11
NSR5
NSR6
NSR7
File: T:\GIS\CONTRACT\0346562\Mxd\EIA\0346562_RNSR.mxdDate: 13/7/2016
Legend
Ç Representative Noise Senstive Receivers (NSRs)
Surface Pipeline
Underground Pipeline
CMC Site Boundary
0 10050Meters´
Figure 4.2
Locations of Representative Noise Sensitive Receivers (NSRs)
