1Deena Abu-Lughod

Children First Intensive

Building Leadership, Network Data Celebration, ARIS Parent

Link

ESO Network 14Eastwood Manor, May 21, 2009

Bob Cohen, NL; Deena Abu-Lughod, SAF

Brandon Alvarez, Jo Ann Benoit, Deirdre Burke, Alan Godlewicz, Dr. Pamela McCarthy

2Deena Abu-Lughod

Provisional Agenda 8:30 Welcome! Announcements, CFI Inquiry Share Fair (6/18) Planning

8:45 CFI: Inquiry and Building Leadership Capacity

10:15 Break

10:30 Network 14 ELA Highlights Celebration

10:50 Planning for ARIS Parent Link

11:15 A Word from our Sponsor: Sussman Sales

11:40 Instructional Needs 2009-10 (Needs Assessment, Principals/Staff Skills Inventory)

12:00 Evaluation

12:05 Study Groups- including planning for June 18th Share Fair

12:30 Lunch- continue Study Group conversations

1:30 Afternoon Consultations: (1) Budget, (2) Progress Report Modeler, (3) Principals Interview Committee

3Deena Abu-Lughod

Outcomes for the day

Plan for the sharing of Inquiry and Study Group Learnings

CFI: Synthesize understandings of the relationship between Inquiry work and instructional leadership

Explore preliminary ELA results and analysis tools

Plan for the roll out of the ARIS Parent link

Evaluate our instructional needs and principals/staff inventory of skills

4Deena Abu-Lughod

”“Taking Responsibility

Research has found that faculty in successful schools always question existing instructional practice and do not blame lack of student achievement on external causes.…The “source of the problem” in ordinary schools is always someone else: the students, the parents/caretakers, the school board, and so on.

— Carl Glickman, 2002, pp. 4, 6

5Deena Abu-Lughod 5

Where we are in the Inquiry Process

Phase II: Move the

Students

Phase I: Identify

Students and

Targets

Phase III: Move the

System

6Deena Abu-Lughod

Analyze systems that

produced conditions of

learning

Design and implement change strategy

Evaluate and revise based on interim progress measures

Phase III: Analyzing systems

7Deena Abu-Lughod

From the target population to the system

The theory of action for the target population was:

If we do X (eg, teach the learning target –Y-- they missed, teach Y differently, teach Y better, change who teaches Y), the target population students will learn Y. Knowing Y, these students will close the gap in their learning this year and move into the sphere of success. This is how you moved the students.

The theory of action for the system is:

If we do Z (eg, change our system for determining what is taught, how it is taught, how well it is taught and who is teaching), we will reduce in the future, the number of students who are outside the sphere of success. This is how you move the system.

8Deena Abu-Lughod

Essential Questions

How can we scale up the work of inquiry teams?

How can we further build leadership?

9Deena Abu-Lughod

Lessons from 333 Leadership Story

What are the qualities of a leader?Inspirational: “How would you like to make 3 million dollars in 3 days?”

Positive: “We won’t spend time on why we can’t”

Action-oriented: “There must be something we can do.”

Resourceful: Tapped on all his contacts; capitalized on each one’s strengths.

Persevering: “We aren’t going to leave until we figure this out.”

Empathetic: He passed through Barrie, saw the damage, considered the implications of not taking action and took action.

Motivational: Gave praise to team members. No idea was too outlandish.

Goal-Oriented: Took action with a clear goal.

Humble: Didn’t matter who got the credit. He gave credit to the team.

10Deena Abu-Lughod

Task I: Inquiry Share

Use Write Sheet: Think/Write (10 mins)

1. What has been the focus of your team’s inquiry work this year? (If you had more than one team pick one to focus on.)

2. How and when will the impact of this inquiry experience (and results) be felt on the larger school community?

3. How did the experience build teacher leadership? What resources and supports were needed to do so? (coaching presence, administrative time, $$)

Next, in your table group, chart a bulleted list of responses to these prompts to share out (15 minutes)

11Deena Abu-Lughod

Task II: Take your bulleted list and discuss…

What are the implications of our findings for building leadership capacity through inquiry?

How is the process of having inquiry team teachers share out to the rest of the community relevant to the development of leadership qualities and skills?

What skill set is necessary for teachers to effectively lead a Professional Learning Community or Inquiry Team?

12Deena Abu-Lughod

Task III: Discuss

Assumption:

Every member of a collaborative school community can act as a leader, dramatically impacting the quality of relationships, the school culture, and student learning. The Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students: Unleashing the Power of Collaborative Inquiry, (Corwin Press, 2008)

How do we know that the leadership and facilitation qualities and skills are being developed?

What frameworks/tools do we use for teams?

What frameworks/tools do we use for individual teachers?

13Deena Abu-Lughod

We’re expanding the sphere of success

The goal of inquiry work is to move every student into the sphere of success.

14Deena Abu-Lughod

Network ELA Data: Predictions

How many of our schools had overall gains that exceeded the City average of 11%?

What percent of students made 1 year progress?

What percent of the Level 1+2 students made 1 year progress?

What percent of the Level 3+4 students made 1 year progress?

In what grade were Proficiency Rate gains the highest?

What was the average Proficiency Rate gain for the Level 1+2 students?

What was the average Proficiency Rate gain for the Level 3+4 students?

15Deena Abu-Lughod

Distribute Data Packet

What do you notice? (10 mins)

What questions do you have? (5 mins)

Deena Abu-Lughod

Network 14Students who made one year of progress in ELA:

56.8 % in 2008

66% in 2009

Only 33% lost proficiency inrelation to their 2008 scores.

What does this mean for your school?

52% below proficiency in 2008 Only 37% below proficiency in 2009 (3,748 students)

17Deena Abu-Lughod 1717

Small increases in proficiency translate into large increases in probability of graduating

93%

80%

51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5

8th Grade Test Score (Average of ELA & Math)

4-Y

ear

Reg

ents

Gra

duat

ion

Rat

e

4-Year Regents Diplomas

Source: 2004 Graduation Cohort (“Class of 2008”) from the 2007/08 Progress Reports

18Deena Abu-Lughod

Acuity Predictive Correlations

In June, most schools will administer the Acuity Predictive assessments.

You’re probably wondering: How useful will this be? How reliable are these assessments in predicting the outcomes on the NYS test?

The answer: Probably very useful! The correlation of the Grade 8 ELA Proficiency Rates with the Fall Acuity Predictive was .759.

An additional resource will become available in ARIS as well: The student-level Item Response from the State test.

19Deena Abu-Lughod

Grade 8 Scatterplot: Fall Acuity by Jan. ELA

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Most students who scored 75+ on Acuity, scored at or above proficiency on the ELA. 60-75% = pushable/slippable

20Deena Abu-Lughod

Next steps with NYS data

Student Item Response data is expected to be posted in ARIS.

Deconstruct the “distinguishing questions” from the State tests to puzzle out which skills separate the 2s from the 3s and the 3s from the 4s. Use the State Benchmarks to identify the “distinguishing questions”.

Look for patterns of strength and weakness for the students ENTERING each classroom so the teacher can work strategically.

Analyze the focus of your curriculum map in relation to the “power standards” identified for that grade, the grade below and the grade above (see the Item Map and Trend Chart).

Conduct “Cause-and-Effect” and “Verifying Causes” protocols with your teams using your disaggregated data.

21Deena Abu-Lughod

Benchmarks and “Distinguishing Questions”

22Deena Abu-Lughod

Identifying Power Standards: Item Maps

23Deena Abu-Lughod

Identifying Power Standards: Trend Charts

24Deena Abu-Lughod

ARIS Parent Link

By May 13, you should have assigned the APL coordinator (usually the parent coordinator) in Galaxy.

Consider the following:

What is the best way for your school to distribute the passwords?

How will you provide training to parents on the use of the APL?

How will you support parents who do not have Internet access?

25Deena Abu-Lughod

How can I help my

child learn?

What is my child

learning? How is my child doing?

ELA Landing Page

26Deena Abu-Lughod

ARIS Parent Link Customized Walkthroughs

What is the assessment?

How does this assessment help you teach my child?

How did my child do on this

assessment?

How can I help my child succeed?

27Deena Abu-Lughod

ARIS Parent Link Student Profile

User-friendly navigation

Help button on every

page Help for parents

28Deena Abu-Lughod

Parent Coordinator Role

Parent Coordinators are essential to successful APL rollout. They should: Support parents in their schools with APL by:

Assisting parents in logging in and using APL. Helping parents find information in APL. Encouraging parents to use APL to help their children.

Work collaboratively with other school staff to empower parents in the education process.

Understand school protocol for handling parent requests for data updates.

APL Administrators manage, distribute, and reset APL passwords for parents.

APL Administrator is a new role principals assign through Galaxy. Principals are encouraged to make their Parent Coordinators APL

Administrators. Principals can assign more than one APL Administrator. APL Administrators have access to confidential student level information

they must handle securely.

29Deena Abu-Lughod

Data Conversation and Planning

30Deena Abu-Lughod

Powerful Words

I wonder how many children’s lives we would save if we educators shared what we knew with each other.

— Roland Barth

31Deena Abu-Lughod

Children First Intensive (CFI)

Inquiry team work at the school/classroom level is the DOE professional development model. It is a model that values the skills, talents and potential available within the school. It aims to build self-reliance and sustainability, through the process of research generated at the school level to meet the needs of and improve outcomes for all the students.

32Deena Abu-Lughod

Skills Inventory and Learning Agenda

33Deena Abu-Lughod

Evaluation: Did we achieve our outcomes?

Plan for the sharing of Inquiry Learnings

CFI: Synthesize understandings of the relationship between Inquiry work and instructional leadership

Explore preliminary ELA results and analysis tools

Plan for the roll out of the ARIS Parent link

Evaluate our instructional needs and principals/staff inventory of skills