Date post: | 20-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | thomas-murphy |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Deep Alteration of Carboniferous Strata in the Midleton, Co. Cork District as Detected byGravity SurveyingAuthor(s): Thomas MurphySource: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Section B: Biological, Geological, andChemical Science, Vol. 64 (1964 - 1966), pp. 323-334Published by: Royal Irish AcademyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20494893 .
Accessed: 22/06/2014 18:18
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Royal Irish Academy is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Proceedings of theRoyal Irish Academy. Section B: Biological, Geological, and Chemical Science.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
[ 323 ]
17.
DEEP ALTERATION OF CARBONIFEROUS STRATA IN THE MIDLETON, CO. CORK DISTRICT AS DETECTED BY
GRAVITY SURVEYING
BY THOMAS MURPHY, M.R.I.A.
PLATES XXVI-XXVII
[Received 29 MARCH. Read, 14 JUNE, 1965. Published, 22 FEBRUARY, 1966.]
ABSTRACT
AT several places in the Cork Syncline, in particular close to the northern Devonian-Carboniferous contact, closed negative gravity anomalies occur. These range up to 4 mgal amplitude and cover about a square kilometre. The cause suggested is decomposition of the Carboniferous Shale and solutioning of the Carboniferous Limestone to a depth of 180 m below the surface, the cavities being filled with the insoluble residue of the limestone and shale together with other washed-in material. The age, by comparison with similar known occurrences in Ireland and England, is probably Tertiary. The surface of the ground is about 10 m M.S.L. and it is suggested that sea level was more than 150 m below the present level in Tertiary Times.
The infilling may contain minerals of commercial value.
INTRODUCTION
In an earlier paper MURPHY (1962) described numerous instances of small
gravity anomalies. which were thought to be caused by extensive solutioning
of the limestone and subsequent filling with loosely-packed unconsolidated
material. Attempts to verify this supposition were severely hampered by
the occurrence of deep drift which reduced the number of outcrops of rock
in their vicinity to almost zero. Some further work was carried out to obtain
more details of the known anomalies but efforts were made to detect similar
anomalies in areas where the rock was much better exposed. One of these
areas was known to occur in the limestone valley which runs through Cork
City and Midleton to Youghal along the centre of the Cork Syncline
(MuRPHY, 1960). The geology of the district has been fully described by
LAMPLUGH et al (1905), outcrops of rock being plentiful.
SURVEY AND ANALYSIS
Measurements of gravity were taken in the accustomed manner with a
WORD?i gravimeter at stations approximately one mile apart. The positions
are marked on Plate 1. Additional readings were taken in very anomalous
areas so that altogether 260 stations were occupied in the area of 200 sq. miles
i.e. 1-3 station per sq. mile or 1 station per 2 sq. kilometre. The heights and
PROC. R.I.A., VOL. 64, SECT. B. [FF]
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
324 Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.
latitudes of each station were obtained from the six-inch to a mile sheets of the Ordnance Survey as in previous work. The Bouguer anomaly deduced,
using a density of 2167 g/cm3 for the rock layer between the station and mean sea level, is also given in Plate 1.
This plate shows part of the pronounced gravity gradient along the
coastline which is an outstanding feature in this region (MURPHY, 1960). In order to bring out the character of the small anomalies a residual map
has been deduced. This was obtained by calculating the average radial value of the Bouguer field for each station and subtracting this value from
the observed Bouguer value. The radius used was 5 km and the number of points, ten. The method had been used in other districts in Ireland because of its rapidity compared with other methods. Since only adding and
subtracting are involved a small portable adding machine is all that is required and the computation of the disturbing masses is straightforward
compared with, say, the second derivative methods.
The results are shown in Plate 2. Owing to the proximity of the sea
over which no gravity measurements have been taken, the regional values
cannot be obtained out to the coast and hence the map. does not cover the
complete area of Plate 1. The gradient to the SSE has been eliminated.
Presumably this is caused by formations at depths comparable to the 5 km
radius chosen for determination of the regional value.
BOUGUER ANOMALY O- X REGIONAL ANOMALY X ', RESIDUAL ANOMALY '+,'
o i les 3L
O Kglometres 5
10 10
X~~~~~~~~~
A_ _ _ ++ ..........MIDLETON
0 + 0~~~~~~~~~
.A A DEVONIAN C CARBONIFEROUS 1 DEV 1 CARB
2-75 2'l 2-11 2:73 2r 6 2 266
FIGuRE 1-Gravity profiles and geological section along a line A A' on Plate 1. The positions of the sampling sites and the values obtained for the rock densities are given below the geological section.
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
MURPHY - beep Alteration of Carboniferous Strata in Midleton. 325
The residual anomaly map now exhibits a major negative tract running approximately east-west, flanked on the north by a broad indefinite positive area and on the south by a narrow positive ridge with indications of a further east-west trough on its southern edge. In the main trough, near its northern edge a series of small closed negative anomalies occurs. When this map is
compared with the geological sketch map taken from the one inch to a mile geological maps of the Geological Survey, it is at once apparent that there
is a strong correlation between, on one hand, the positive belts and the
Devonian and on the other between the negative troughs and the
Carboniferous series which here is mainly of limestone. Thus the difference in the level of the anomaly of about 3 mgal, not taking the small intense anomalies into account, must be due to the average difference in density of the two formations.
Profiles of the Bouguer, regional and residual anomalies together with the geological section (from the one inch to a mile maps) and the measured
densities of samples of the rocks are drawn in Figure 1. The line of section,
approximately north-south through Midleton, is given as A A' in Plate 1. It is thought (private communication from D. R. WHITBREAD) that the Carboniferous trough through Midleton is 2-3 miles deep with vertical sides of 15' 175 miles.
Density of the rock formations. From general work in the south of Ireland it is known that the rocks are compact, the pore space being less than
1%, so that the density difference depends entirely on the mineral content of the rock. The Devonian series is for the most part slaty (LAMPLUGIK etc.,
1905) and the sandstones are non-porous. The lower beds of the Carboniferous series are shales and compare in density with the adjacent Devonian. The only light formation of consequence is the Carboniferous Limestone, samples
of which as elsewhere in Ireland give a density of 2-71 g/cm3. The various
densities for water saturated samples are given in Table 1.
TABLE 1-Densities of rock samples
Number
Formation| Type of Density range Average Estimated Mean
Samples Percentage Density
g/Cm3 g/cm3
red slate 20 2%678 - 2-793 2*748 33 1/3
Devonian green slate 7 2.698 - 2-723 2-715 33 1/3 2.716
sandstone 14 2-6.62 - 2-724 2-684 33 1/3
shale 4 2 635 - 2-704 2-659 25
Carboniferous 2-694 limestone 8 2 705 - 2-712 2-708 75
PROC. R.I.A., VOL. 64, SECT. B. [GG]
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
326 Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.
Of the rock formations given in Table 1, only the limestone can be taken
as homogeneous for thicknesses of the order of a few kilometres. The samples
give densities within a narrow range but it may be thought necessary to
make allowance for solutioning as in the Midleton area many caves are
known to exist. However, from evidence of borings (private communications)
in search of minerals in various parts of Ireland, the Carboniferous Limestone
is in general only subject to solutioning effects within a few hundred metres
of the surface so that it is thought quite safe to accept a density of 2-71 g/cm3
for a formation with a thickness of the order of a kilometre.
In contrast, as shown in Table 1, the densities of the various other rock
types vary from 2 66 g/cm3 for sandstones to almost 2P80 g/cm3 for slates.
The latter are red or purple in colour and probably contain a considerable
amount of haematite.
To arrive at density values for the rock formations that produce the
gravity effects, a division is made between the denser formations, the Devonian
sandstone and slate and the higher formations, the Carboniferous shale and
limestone. Estimates of the percentages, arbitrary in the case of the former and
taken from the cross section of Figure 1 in the latter, are given in Table 1.
The mean densities then become 2 716 and 21694 g/cm3 or in other words a
density difference of 0f022 g/cm3.
This density difference, 0'022 g/cmi, might be thought very small for
computational trials but it cannot be very much greater, certainly not more
than 0'05 g/cm3 for the following reasons. The density measured for the
Carboniferous shale is probably low due to the difficulty in securing
unweathered samples so that 2J70g/cm3 might be a better figure for the
lighter rocks. The value for the denser rocks depends very much on estimating
the relative amounts of slate and sandstone, in effect it is the percentage of
silica that is the important factox. If the denser formation is taken as being
comprised of red slate represented by the 20 samples measured then the
density would be 2 75 g/cinm3 This combined with 2 70 g/cm3 would give
a difference of 0105 g/cmn3 and this then can be looked on as the upper limit.
Computation of gravity differences. It has been lmentioned earlier that, on geological grounds, the 'Carboniferous trough is thought to be about 4km
deep. If, at one extreme, the section is taken to be semicircular with a
diameter of 5 km (cf Plate 2) then with a density difference of 0 022 g/cm3
the anomnaly expected would be -1-4 mgal As the section is thought to
be iectangular in the upper reaches then, at another extreme, taking a
rectangular section 5 knm wide by 4 km deep, the maximum anomaly to be
expected is -213 mgal. Taking the density difference of 0Q05 g/cm3 and the same sections then
the anomalies to be expected would be 3-3 and 5-1 nigal.
As the measured anomaly lies between the computed extremes the gravity
trough running east-west across the residual iilap can be explained by a
small difference in density between the rocks mainly of Carboniferous age
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
NIiiwivni-Deep Alte,ration of Carboniferons Strata in Midleto a. 327
in the topographic valley and the enclosing formation of Devonian. The
dliflerence in density would lie in the ianrge 0 02 and 0105 g/cm3. A similar
explanation can be given for the gravity trough to the south.
THE INTENSE SMALL ANOMALIES
At several places in the northern gravity trough (Plate 2) the negative
anomaly values are much lower than the -3 mngal discussed above and the
character is completely different so that an analysis on similar lines would
be to no avail.
These anomalies all lie in gravity troughs and in fact on the limestone.
Each anomaly has large gradients associated with it and the areal extent is
small. Because of the latter it was not possible to measure the details without
recourse to levelling which is very time-consuming and not justifiable at
this stage. The lowest value of the anomaly in Plate 2 was measured at a
point one mile west of the village of Carrigtohill which is itself four miles
west of Midletonr The gravity profile tlhrough this point has been drawn
in Figure 2 and this shows gradients in excess of 10 mgal/km and a minimum
value of -7'1 mgal (residual). By comparison the profile through Midleton,
Figure 1, has a low value of -2'8 mgal; a difference of 4'3 mgal. The profile
shows a complicated anomaly and allowing for the effect of the syncline at
least another 4 mgal have to be explained for the deepest part.
SOUGUER ANOMALY O f REGIONAL ANOMALY x 0
RESIDUAL ANOMALY ?' 10 /X10
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 ? Kdiometres 5 X
U..~~~~~~~~~~X
+~ ?t
++
+ (0
+ +~~~-1
B B
DEVONIAN 1 CARBONIFEROUS I DEV 1
FiGURRE 2-Gravity profiles and geological sectiorn along a line B B' on
Plate 1
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
328 Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy
Further cast, west of Youghal, the gravity troughi is niot as low, being
at about -1 mgal while the smaller anomalies reach -33 mgal, a deficiency
of 2'3 mgal. There are others of the same order elsewhere on Plate 2.
Cause. The size of the anomalies and the gradients involved are similar
to others reported in central Ireland (MURPHY, 1962). For the reasons given
in that account the gravity effects here too cain only be produced by light unconsolidated materials in the limestone. As the water table is close to the
surface only water-saturated material is considered Assuming that these
light materials are sand or boulder clay, the mineral content would have a
density of between 2165 and 2 75 g/cm3 and the void ratio would be
between 0 4 and 0'5. The resulting bulk density of water-saturated material
would lie between 21 and 23 g/cm3 as given in 'Table 2 For the purposes
of calculation the lower value 2 1 g/cmi will be taken
TABLE 2
Computed densities for zvater-saturated unconvoldated sedimentts
likely to occur at Carrzgtohzll
Void Mineral Water-saturated ratio density bulk density
g/cmi g/cm3
0 4 2-65 2 178 1 2*70 2-214
2 75 2*250 0 5 2065 2ll10
2-70 2-133 2-75 2-166
Analysis. The Carrigtohill anomaly has an areal shape approximately
that of a circle one kilometre in diameter (Figure 3). Assuming a cylindrlcal
cavity of this size filled with a material of 2 1 g/cm' the density contrast with
limestone would be 016 g/cm' (2 7 - 24I) The depth of such light material
necessary to produce an anomaly of -4 mgal would be about 180 m (590 f t)
Although 21 g/cm3 can be looked on as a low value even taking densities
as low as 1P8 g/cm3 depths of the order of 100 m are necessary to explain
the gravity deficiency.
Tlohe smaller anomalies west of Youghal have not been surveyed in detail
because of the lack of suitable levelled roads. Whatever form they may take,
the deficiency of mass is equivalent to a thickness of light materials of the
order of 10Gm.
Position. It has already been stated that these anomalies occur in the
limestone valley but so far no outcropping rock of any description has been
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
MURPHY -Deep Alteration of Carboniferous Strata in Midletonl. 329
.4 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..
, ?'Z-07 ,.
,* r,, r . . ....... 0 - 3 .. . ;
.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
8 Solid .... . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. .,-,Alvu . . . ,;"@?'s'
Gravel mound __s __________ 1-7 - #hill.t
.. . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..... . . . . .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~.....
N .. . . .. .... ... .. ..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~... ...
~Solid
Re.mainder~ is Bioulder clay with ~~- -
Gravel mrounds 1-7
| Station with BougVer anomaly 2.0.,
FIGURE 3-Position of gravity stations with residual anomaly values together with the drift and solid geology from manuscript maps of the Geological Survey.
found inside the intense anomalous area. This is quite significant and
characteristic of occurrences elsewhere in Ireland. In some places it is possible
that an anomaly occurs in areas mapped as Carhoniferous Shale but this type
of small anomalies has not been detected or suspected outside the Carboniferous
series. When they occur in aieas mapped as Carboniferous Shale then they
lie within a few hundred metres of the mapped limestone contact.
In the Youghal area of anomalies no outcrop of any rock occurs.
The position of the anomalies with respect to the centre of the syncline
is quite significant. They lie in lines near the mnargins of the limestone, the
north side being preferred (Plate 2). It is a distinct characteristic of these
valleys (LAMPLUGH et al, 1905) that the lowest ground occurs immediatelv
at the foot of the steep slopes of the Devonian strata while the centre rises to
kniolls of massive limestone. For example the River Lee at Cork flows along
one side of the limestone syncline.
The ground level at the sites of the anomalies is close to sea level. At
Carrigtohill the highest point is 13 m (40 ft.) M.S.L. atop a gravel mound
and the average height of the gravity stations over the anomnaly is 6-7 m (22 ft.)
M.S.L. The bottom of the light materials as computed above then lies well
below sea level,
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
330 Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.
Origin. In the earlier paper quoted, the suggestion put forward was
that almost complete solutioning of the limestone had taken place and by
collapse the subsequent cavity was filled with waste material and glacial
gravels. Since that time further work to elicit evidence for this theory has
been collected and forms the subject of another publication.
The main results of this work are that glacial gravels can only be a very
minor constituent if present at all and that the Carboniferous Limestone has
in places suffered extensive deep alteration either by subaerial weathering
or by some other process not yet discovered. The calcium carbonate is
dissolved out and the remaining mainly siliceous part of the limestone is
left along with some washed-in materials, the process having taken place
in preglacial times. A similar suggestion is now offered to explain the origin of the Carrigtohill
and other small anomalies.
One of the reasons for doing gravity work in the Midleton area was also to investigate the possibility of detecting gravity anomalies associated with
the Cloyne Clays. These deposits, reported by BISHoPP and MCOCLUSKEY in 1948, are of silica sands and clays and while their origin was not clear
to these workers it was thought that they were due to the decomposition
of the shales.
Attempts were made to take readings across the belt of the deposits but
because of the lack of levelled roads no measurements were taken at the
actual sites of the occurrences. Nevertheless the readings taken nearby
reveal that there are no anomalies on the scale of one kilometre diameter.
Other readings on the extension of the belt did give anomalies, for example
at the points (1887 640), (1978 677) and (2008 679). Here the geology is hidden by deep drift The size of these anomalies is about -1 5 mgal and
they are not outstanding.
The position of the Carrigtohill anomaly on the northern side of the
syncline very close to the limestone-shale boundary suggests that a similar
decomposition of the limestone shale and the limestone has taken place
but to a much greater degree and extent. The Soil Survey sheets of the
Geological Survey report the whole area as covered by alluvium or drift
mainly of gravel in mounds up to a height of 40 ft. (Figure 3). Directly to
the east, there are limestone outcrops and here the anomaly increases sharply.
On the west at a distance of over a kilometre limestone outcrops. No readings could be taken in this direction on account of the river estuary. A perusal
of aerial photographs (Geological Survey) does not give any indication of
rock close to the surface within the anomaly. It does not seem possible at
present, except at considerable expense, to investigate the matter further
geologically and there are no visual indications which might stimulate
exploration for economic minerals.
Dating. The size and occurrence of the anomalies in limestone invite
comparison with the "Pocket Deposits" of Derbyshire in England (KENT, 1957X
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
MluI1tuH'v --Deep Alteration of Carboniferous Strata irn Midleton. 331
YOuKEI, 1961) and the glass sands in Wales (THOMAS, 1959). The deposits iti Derbyshire are of sand with clay and pebbles and they, occur in steep
wtllcd cavities in Carboniferous limestone or dolomite. They vary in size, tie largest being of the order of 100 m wide and over half a km long
(YORKB). The depths are not known but they are in excess of 150 m (KENT).
Such deposits should produce anomalies of nearly 2 mgal but so far only
anomalies of the order of 05 mgal have been recorded (Gravity Survey of
Great Britain and private communications from BULLERWELL) and the extent
of the anomalous area is of the order of the deposit. Gravitationally they
are thus not strictly comparable.
The Welsh occurrences are of larger size and anomalies of several mgal
could be expected but no gravity measurements have been taken over them
(cf MURPHY, 1962). There are other occurrences in Ireland and North Wales
but in most cases the dimensions are smaller and usually the depths are
unknown. The Welsh deposits have been given a tentative dating by THOMAS as
"from mid-Tertiary times" while the dating of the Derbyshire ones has been
put as early as Triassic by YORKE who states that they were "trapped in
pre-existing limestone hollows, in part solution cavities and in part great
surface watercourses". The various occurrences of similar but smaller deposits in limestone in
Ireland are being reported elsewhere. They are known to have included
in the in-filling, various materials dated as Cretaceous (WALSH, 1960)' in
Co. Kerry, and Eocene (WATTS, 1957) ih Co. Tipperary. Trhe Cloyne Clay has not been given any date.
It would seem then that the age of the Carrigtohill and Youghal deposits
can only vaguely be put as Tertiary in line with the other deposits thought
to be similar in these islands.
Dsscu SSION
Having arrived at the conclusion that decomposition of the shale anld
solutioning of the limestone have taken place in the Cork-Midleton trough,
it is difficult to explain the process as being confined to deep pits strung out along a line.
Considering first the possibility that subaerial weathering is the cause then
it is to be expected that ground water level would be important. In this
area it is known that the River Lee has cut a trench to 158 ft. below M.S.L.
at Cork City with a gradient of the order of 20 ft per mile. FARRINGTON (1959) while commenting that it is ". . . probably influenced by low sea-level of
a glacial period . . ." does not discuss the dating of the trench further.
At the eastern extremity of the Plates, at the new Youghal bridge, the
River Blackwater has a similar buried valley which ORME (1964) has
estimated to have a base level of -158 ft M.S.L. beyond the present coast.
If the Blackwater at its mouth has a profile similar to the Lee in its lower
reaches, then this estimate of base level would be increased considerably.
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
332 Proceedtings of the Royal Tiush Academy.
Nevertheless since ground water level must have been about the level
calculated for the bottom of the cavity at Carrigtohill for a considerable time, the corresponding sea level must have been very low at the time for
Carrigtohill is as far from the open sea as Cork City. Furthermore a deep
exit to the sea must also have existed either underground or as a channel.
In the Cork-Youghal limestone valley particularly near Midleton the
limestone is well exposed and while caves etc. are known to exist (LAMPLUGH)
these are small and no gravity anomalies associated with them have been
detected. It is taken that they were produced by subaerial weathering but
at a more recent date. It is not known whether any of these occur below
sea level.
Evidence that solutioning and infilling of Carboniferous Limestone has
taken place to depths at least close to if not below present sea level, has
recently become available. At Drogheda in the limestone quarry of CEMENT
LTD. there occurs a series of deposits in vertical pipes consisting mainly of
silica sand similar in appearance to the Derbyshire deposits. The floor of
the quarry is at 62 ft. M.S.L. and it is obvious that the bottom of the
deposits is well below this level but the depth has as yet not been ascertained.
Four miles to the southwest of this quarry a similar pipe is visible at the
surface at 192i ft. M.S.L. and a boring made in the vicinity has encountered
sand down to a depth of 35 ft M.S.L. without reaching solid rock. This latter
place is six miles west of the Irish Sea. The 35 ft. M.S.L. level is below the depth
of the beds of any rivers in the neighbourhood The filling of these pipes is
not of glacial origin but it contains decalcified chert and remnants of shale
thought to be of Namurian origin (Private communication, WHITEBREAD).
The limestones in the vicinity do not appear to contain chert.
Thus while there is evidence of solutioning having taken place near
Midleton and evidence for cavities in limestone down to present sea level
it is still difficult to visualise subacrial weathering having taken place to
depths of the order calculated at Carrigtohill without very low sea levels in
pre-glacial times. The position of the anomalies close to the Devonian slates appears to
be significant. It may be because the shales were the most easily eroded, as
JUKiES (1862) supposed and the resulting channel would bring the acid waters
coming off the Devonian strata against the adjacent limestone which then
would be attacked more readily (THOMAS, 1954) The depths to which
these waters could reach is again probably determined by ground water
level and so the above remarks regarding very low sea level apply.
On the other hand it is possible that the limestone and shale are attacked
not by subaerial agencies but by some other means for Bisnopp and
MCCLuSKEY (1948) in their investigation of the Cloyne deposits reached
the conclusion that the silica beds were in essence the disintegrated basal
beds of the Carboniferous but confessed themselves baffled as to how this
had come about. They drew attention to their occurrence along with similar
deposits in Ireland, to districts where "there has been appreciable faulting
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
MuRPHY - Deep Alteration of Carboniferous Strata in Midle ton. 333
and considerable mechanical stress caused by folding and faulting". A suggestion was made:- "The origin of the Cloyne beds is probably bound
up with physico-chemical conditions at the time of their deposition; whether disintegration has been furthered by sulphuric acid liberated by the
weathering of the pyrites which occurs in the underlying Devonian beds is
an open question."
Since the gravity anomalies in the Cork syncline lie in a position
analogous to the silica deposits in the Cloyne syncline it is not unreasonable to
assume that similar conditions prevail but as yet there is a complete absence of any geological evidence. It is thus possible that the light materials present
at Carrigtohill etc. could have a commercial value similar to the Cloyne
and the Derbyshire Pocket Deposits. However, due to their occurrence
close to sea level and the thick drift, their exploitation is another matter.
AcKNOWLEDGMENTS
I wish to thank D. WHITEHEAD of Trinity College for drawing my
attention to the results of the borings carried out by Messrs. ICEMENT Lm.
and J. HUMPHEYS of that Company for acquainting me with the presence
of the solution channels in their quarry at Drogheda. Finally I am grateful
tO CEMENT Lm. for their co-operation and for permitting me to quote details
from their records.
References
BrsHOPP, D. W. and McCluskey, J. A. G. 1948 Sources of industrial
silica in Ireland. Pamphlet 3, Geological Survey of Ireland, Dublin.
Farrington, A. The Lee basin. Part one : Glaciation. Proc Roy. Irish
Acad., 60, B, 135-166,
Jukes, J. B. 1862 On the mode of formation of some of the river-valleys in the south of Ireland. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, 18, 378-403.
Kent, P. E. 1957 Triassic relics and the 1,000-foot surface in the southern
Pennines. East Midland Geographer, 8, 3-10.
Lamplugh, G. W. et al. 1905 The geology of the country around Cork
and Cork Harbour. Memoir Geol. Survey of Ireland, Dublin.
Murphy, T. 1960 Gravity anomaly map of Ireland, sheet 5?south west.
Geophys. Bull. Dublin Inst. Adv. Stud., No. 18. - 1962 Some unusual low Bouguer anomalies of small extent
in central Ireland and their connection with geological structure.
Geophys. Prosp., 10, 258-270.
Orme, A. R. 1964 Plantation surfaces in the Drum Hills, County Waterford,
and their wider implications. Irish Geog., 5, 48-72.
Thomas, T. M. 1954 Solution subsidence outliers of Millstone Grit in the
Carboniferous Limestone of the North Crop of the southwest
coalfield. Geol Mag., 91, 220-226
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
334 Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy.
Walsh, P. T. 1960 An occurrence of Cretaceous chalk in the Killarney district, Eire. Proc Geol. Soc No. 1581, 113.
Watts, W. A. 1957 A Tertiary deposit m County Tipperary. Set. Proc.
Roy. Dublin Soc, 27, 309-311.
Yorke, C. 1961 The pocket deposits of Derbyshire. Birkenhead, England,
private publication. Gravity Survey overlay map, sheet 11 1956. Geological Survey of Great
Britain, London.
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
PRoc. R. I. AcAD., VOL. 64, SECT. B.
180
0 I -*~~~~~~~~~
/ /
0
0 0~~~~
I 0~~0\
0~~~*~~~ ,/0ARRG1O IL
-0~~~~~~~ 0~~~~~~
70~~~
4,i> ,'* 0 , ,
COB ' ARGTHL
- -~~~~~~~~~ -- -~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---4-~ ~~~~~~~~o 70 - - - - -~~is
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
A
190
/ ' ~* --1, -. /
,// ~ ~~ -" l, I~ -/ .. (
'''\~ ~ * - ''" I"' '" 'I -, I - -\ .s__
' _ _0 ILTO
-
At 190
Figures 1 and 2. N 0 .,?< -.0
'
N I 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0 O MI DLETON. *
~ToH;LL - - / - - -~ -. -:- -~ - - - 0CASTLEMAPF6TYR
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-1 - - 1 - 0~~~~~~~~~~~
-~~~~~ -
- -. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o
- - --I- -- -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 - - - - -. /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -. -, - I S~~~~~~~~0 - - -~~~~~~~~~~. -0 0
-.0 . -.
- I.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N / ~OCLOYNE - -~~~~~~~~~~~~~L
- N~~~~ ~ ~~~~~13
0 --
-- - 0 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I -
A 190
PLATIE 1-Sketch map with National Grid showing the positions of the gravity stations and BOUGUER anomaly contours. The gravity profiles etc. along the lines A A' and B B' are drawn in Figures I and 2.
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
PLATE XXVI
200 210
10
0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~8
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~ _ { _ ~~~~~~~~13-_ -.--1_'-YOUGHALS
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0~~~~~~~~~1
0 X D o _~ ~~ * N * -bUGE ANOMLY
- 0 |,06g 1 nma
'~~~. -</ / oiino rvt tto
20 . 210
0 B o /0
N I. ~~BOUGUER ANOMALY ) ~~~~~~~in mgal
I Position of gravity station
--- * Jj~. - - National Grid
200 210
(Based on the Ordnance Survey by permission of the Government)
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
I CY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
ti ~ t
/ I
clJ
I~~~~~~~~~~~~~tn
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
0
cg
0~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0~~~~
0~~~~~~~~~~
N 10 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ .~~~ L ~ ~ C
cli~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~U
410~~~~~~~~~~~0
ii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i
________
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
I,
-s4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -1
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~b 01
%. .-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i
0 , .
C%j ~ ~ ~
00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I..
I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c
'I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4
Ii *~~~~~~l
This content downloaded from 91.229.248.154 on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 18:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions