DELIA A. ARCISOResearcher

The Effect of Using Multimedia and Team

Teaching on the Science Achievement Level of

Fourth Year Students ofLibertad National High

School

Education encounters over population, education philosophy development and the change of teacher’s role, the spread of illiteracy, lack of staff and the technological development and mass media.

RATIONALE OF THE STUDY

Welch, Bownell and Seridan(1999) described team teaching as a restructuring of teaching procedures in which two or more educators who possess distinct sets of skills, work in a co- active and co-ordinate fashion to jointly teach academically and behaviorally heterogeneous groups of students in an educationally integrated classroom setting.

RATIONALE OF THE STUDY

This study is focused in finding out the

effect of using multimedia and teamteaching and its uses in education on thestudent’s academic achievement,especially the fourth year students ofLibertad National High School incomparison with their colleagues whobenefit from this curriculum through

traditional education.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

1. Is there any significant difference between the average marks of the experimental group and that of the control group in the pretest of the fourth year student’s academic achievement in science subject?

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

2. Is there any significant difference between the average of the experimental group and that of the control group in the post test of the fourth year students’ academic achievement in science subject?

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

3. Is there any significant difference between the average marks of the experimental group and that of the control group in the pre and posttest of the fourth year students’ academic achievement in science subject?

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

1. There is difference between the average marks of the experimental group and that of the control group in the pre-test of the fourth year students’ academic achievement in the science subject.

HYPOTHESES

2. There is significant difference between the average marks of the experimental group and that of the control group in the posttest of the fourth year students’ academic achievement in science subject.

HYPOTHESES

3. There is significant difference between the average marks of the experimental group and that of the control in the pre and posttest of the fourth year students’ academic achievement in the science subject.

HYPOTHESES

The scope of the study isconfined to the scienceachievement level of the fourthyear students ofLibertad National High School, School Year 2013-2014.

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

1. It allows reaching asimplified strategy which leads to easy understanding of the part of the students.

2. It raises the students' academic achievement in science subject.

3. It encourages the use of multimedia and team teaching in the school

environment.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY

INSTRUMENTS

• PRETEST/ POST TEST

RESEARCH PARTICIPAN

TS

• 4TH YEAR STUDENTS

• NARRA• EUCALYPTUS

RESEARCH DESIGN

• QUASI EXPERIMENTAL

STATISTICAL

TREATMENT

• MEAN• T-test

Results of the pretest of the control and experimental groups

It reveals that there is no significant differencebetween the control and experimental groups atthe significant level of 0.05 in the pre-test which

indicates the equivalence of the two groups.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Group Number Mean t-stat

Control 40 10.13793

1.4401

Experimental

40 10.20689

Results of the post test for the experimental and the control groups.

Table shows significant difference between the control and the experimental groups at the significant level of 0.05 in the post test in

favor of the experimental group.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Group Number Mean t-stat

Control 40 27.03448

-3.9132

Experimental

40 34.13793

Comparison between the results of the pre and posttest for the control and experimental groups

Table shows that there is a significant differencebetween the pre and posttest at the significantlevel of 0.05 for both the control and the

experimental groups

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Group Pretest Mean

t-stat

Posttest Mean

t-stat

Control 10.13793 1.4401

27.03448

-3.9132

Experimental

10. 20689

34.13793

1. There is no significant difference between the mean of the experimental group and that of the control group in the pretest of the fourth year students’ academic achievement in the Science

subject.

CONCLUSIONS

2. There is significant difference between the mean of the experimental group and that of the control group. in the posttest of the fourth year students’ academic achievement in the Science subject.

CONCLUSIONS

3. There is a significant difference between the mean of the experimental group and that of the control group in the pre and posttest of the fourth year students’ academic achievement in the Science subject.

CONCLUSIONS

3. It is observed that the development of the academic achievement for the experimental group is greater than that of the control group. This stresses the effective use of multimedia and team teaching in presenting lessons.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the study results which indicated the effective use of multimedia and team teaching compared to the traditional methods of teaching, the study recommends the following:

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Use of multimedia and team teaching in presenting lessons.

2. Stress the use of multimedia as an educational tool in teaching.

RECOMMENDATIONS

3. Give training courses to teachers regarding the use of multimedia in teaching not only to Science subjects but also to other subjects.

RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDATIONS

4. Conduct more studies on using multimedia and team teaching in the academic curriculum in Libertad National High School.