Pre-Demolition Hazardous Material Survey Report Administration Building, Building D
Piedmont High School 800 Magnolia Street
Piedmont, CA
May 28, 2018 (Final) Milani & Associates Project No.: 1048
Submitted to: Piedmont Unified School District
760 Magnolia Street Piedmont, CA 94611
Submitted by: Milani & Associates
2655 Stanwell Drive, Ste. 105 Concord, CA 94520
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD) intends to demolish the existing Administration Building (Building D), trellis/portico structure and associated concrete walkways and surface treatments in the immediate vicinity of the Administration Building. The Administration Building is part of the Piedmont High School Campus operated by PUSD and is located at 800 Magnolia Avenue in Piedmont, CA. The Administration Building and the Piedmont High School Campus are shown in the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The approximate demolition limits of the project are shown in Figure 2. The demolition of the Administration Building will be subject to removal of hazardous materials covered under the federal NESHAP Regulation. To comply with NESHAP, a demolition-level hazardous material survey was conducted by Milani & Associates under contract to the PUSD. The pre-demolition hazardous materials survey included the following elements:
• Review of previous AHERA Triannual Re-Inspection Reports (1988, 1991 and 1994),
• Review of the AHERA Management Plan (1988),
• Review of the previous fire alarm hazardous material survey for the Piedmont High School,
• Review of previous waste characterization testing associated with the selected Administration Building renovation projects.
• Inspecting and sampling the structure (interior, exterior and roof) for Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM) for compliance with the federal NESHAP regulation and applicable federal and state Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations,
• Evaluating and sampling the structure (interior, exterior, roof and concrete foundation) for Category I Non-Friable (CAT I NF) and Category II Non-friable (CAT II NF) Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs). The evaluation included assessing if these materials could be made friable during the demolition of the building. Where these materials could be made friable during demolition, these materials would be re-classified as RACM and would be subject to the federal NESHAP regulation, applicable federal and state Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) regulations covering building renovation and/or demolition,
• Evaluating and sampling building materials, building components and paint coating systems for lead using bulk sampling and nondestructive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) testing for initial waste characterization purposes, and
• Inspecting the structure for the presence of Other Regulated Materials (ORMs) and Universal Wastes that may require removal prior to demolition, may require special handling and packaging or may require waste profiling to determine appropriate disposal.
Previous asbestos and lead data from prior hazardous material surveys and waste characterization were utilized as reported. The scope of the pre-demolition survey did not include performing a mold survey,
ii
sampling of sub-slab vapor barrier systems or sampling of the underground utilities (electrical, water, sewer) for asbestos. The scope of the pre-demolition survey did not include collection and analysis full depth samples of add-on texture coats with lead-containing or lead-based paint coating systems for waste characterization. The hazardous material survey also excluded testing soil for Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA). Soil testing for NOA was performed by the project geotechnical consultant. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY SUMMARY Renovation History Based on a review of the AHERA management report, the Administration Building was originally constructed in 1978. PUSD personnel indicated that in the 1990’s, Classroom 18 was converted for use as counseling offices. The Classroom 18 counseling office conversion included installation of new partition walls, carpet, drop ceiling system, new HVAC ducting and new lighting. The original lighting system for Classroom 18, which is located above the new drop ceiling, was disconnected but not removed. Hazardous Material Survey Overview A pre-demolition hazardous material survey was conducted on July 13, 2017. A supplemental survey was conducted on May 10, 2018. Reasonable efforts were made to access all areas and locate conditions/materials representative of the structure. The general site access was made available by PUSD. Survey activities were performed by Mr. Mark Milani, Cal/OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant 08-4469 and CDPH Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor #21323 and Mr. Jerry Lee, Environmental Technician with Milani & Associates. A preliminary walk-through of the interior, exterior and roof of the structure was performed to familiarize the inspector with the structure. During the walk-through, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) ducting; hot and cold water supply piping; other mechanical systems requiring thermal system insulation (TSI); and other suspect applications that were readily accessible were inspected for suspect asbestos-containing TSI, where present. The interior, exterior and roof of the building were assessed for suspect asbestos-containing surfacing materials, suspect asbestos-containing miscellaneous friable materials, suspect asbestos-containing CAT I NF materials, and suspect asbestos-containing CAT II NF materials. The interior, exterior and roof of the building were also assessed for the following:
• Suspect lead-containing components,
• Suspect lead-containing paint (LCP) coating systems,
• Suspect lead-based paint (LBP) coating systems,
• Other Regulated Materials (ORMs) and
• Universal Wastes. The assessment for lead-containing components, LCP and LBP included bulk sampling of ceramic tile building components and conducting a non-destructive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) lead survey of the
iii
interior, exterior and roof of the structure. The XRF survey was used to analyze painted surfaces and architectural components for lead presence.
The following ORMs and Universal Wastes were assessed using visual observation methods:
• Mercury-containing devices (fluorescent light tubes, compact fluorescent bulbs [CFLs], HVAC thermostats),
• PCB-containing devices and/or materials (electrical light ballasts, caulking),
• Low-Level Radioactive Materials (self-powered [tritium-containing] exit signs),
• Ozone Depleting Chemicals (compressor oils and refrigerants used in HVAC and refrigeration systems), and
• Pressure Treated Wood/Treated Wood Waste (TWW). ORMs, Universal Wastes, and other known hazardous materials are also generally required to be removed prior to demolition since they can require special handling, packaging, and recordkeeping for disposal and/or recycling. Pressure treated wood is required to be handled and disposed of under the alternative management standards (AMS) under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 34 where it is not scheduled for reuse or reclamation by the owner. Sampling Summary (Asbestos) Bulk sampling for asbestos was conducted in accordance with modified procedures outlined in the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (40 CFR 763.86, Sampling). The procedure requires the inspector to select random sampling locations from homogeneous materials suspected to contain asbestos. To comply with recent EPA and BAAQMD guidance, the supplemental ACM survey also included evaluating and sampling the concrete foundation systems (footings and slab-on-grade), and concrete surface treatments that were scheduled for demolition for asbestos. Fifty-six (56) suspect ACM bulk samples were collected from the interior and exterior of the building and from the building roof and foundation systems during the survey. The samples were sealed in uniquely labeled bags and shipped under chain-of-custody procedures to EMSL Analytical Laboratories (EMSL) located in San Leandro, CA. EMSL is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for the analysis of asbestos in bulk samples by EPA Method 600/R-93/116. A copy of EMSL’s NVLAP Certification is included in Appendix A. Asbestos analyses included analysis by standard PLM. This was augmented by point counting (400-point count) on selected bulk samples where samples were identified as containing trace asbestos (Trace [<1% asbestos]). In addition, all drywall joint compound layers found to contain asbestos at less than 3% asbestos were also subject to 400-point count. The asbestos bulk sample locations for the building interior, building exterior, building foundation and roof are shown on the Bulk Sample Location Plans, Figures 3 and 4. The results of the asbestos analyses are tabulated in Tables 1A (interior and foundation), 1B (exterior & roof), and 1C (site exterior). The asbestos analytical reports are included in Appendix A. The referenced Tables and Figures are included in the respective tabbed “Figures” and “Tables” sections of the report.
iv
Sampling Summary (Lead) The assessment for lead-containing components, LCP and LBP included bulk sampling of ceramic tile building components and conducting a non-destructive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) lead survey of the interior, exterior and roof of the structure. The XRF survey was used to analyze painted surfaces and architectural components for lead presence. Four (4) bulk samples were collected from the ceramic tile systems observed in the two exterior restrooms. The lead bulk samples were sealed in uniquely labeled bags and shipped under chain-of-custody procedures to EMSL Analytical Laboratories (EMSL) located in San Leandro, CA. EMSL is certified by the California Department of Health Services Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) for the various EPA and SW-846 Test Methods utilized for lead testing. A copy of EMSL’s California ELAP Certification is included in Appendix A. Bulk sampling for lead, where performed, was performed in accordance with industry standards in existence at the time of the project. The XRF survey was performed in accordance with industry standards in existence the time of the project. Sample locations were determined based on the building components and paint coating systems observed during the inspection. The bulk lead sample locations for the building interior and exterior are shown on the Bulk Sample Location Plan, Figures 3 and 4. The location of building components and paint coating systems identified as being LCP or LBP determined during the XRF survey are shown in Figure 5. The results of the bulk lead analyses are tabulated in Tables 2A and 2B. Figure 6 depicts a lead waste characterization flowchart. Copies of the lead analytical reports are included in Appendix A. Copies of the lead XRF survey reports are included in Appendix B. Sampling Summary (Previous Survey Data) Previous asbestos and lead data from prior hazardous material surveys and waste characterization were utilized as reported. The previous asbestos and lead bulk sample results have been incorporated into the Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary Tables (Tables 1A, 1B, and 1C) and into the Lead Bulk Sample Analytical Summary Tables (Tables 2A and 2B), respectively. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY FINDINGS - ASBESTOS Survey Areas Found to Contain Asbestos The summarized inventory of materials tested and found TO CONTAIN asbestos at concentrations greater than 1% that are regulated under AHERA as TSI, Surfacing and Miscellaneous and regulated under NESHAPS as CAT I NF, CAT II NF or RACM are described below: Building Interior:
• Resilient Floor Tile (RFT), gray-brown with black mastic, 5% Chrysotile [Miscellaneous/Category I NF ACM]. The RFT is in the Janitor Closet (entire floor) and the North Storeroom (approximate 80% of floor area),
v
• Sink Soundproof Coating, black, 3% Chrysotile [Miscellaneous/Category I NF ACM]. The sink is in the Work Room in the administration section of the building.
Building Exterior and Roof:
• None Identified Site Exterior and Concrete Foundation:
• None Identified The summarized inventory of materials tested and found TO CONTAIN asbestos at concentrations regulated under OSHA (greater than 0% but less than or equal to 1%) is described below: Building Interior:
• Drywall Joint Compound, <0.25% to 0.5% Chrysotile (ACCM), by PLM 400-point count
• Blackboard Shim Tile, <25% Chrysotile (ACCM), by PLM 400-point count
The ACCM drywall is located throughout the building interior except in the counseling office renovation area (former Classroom 18). The shim tile is located behind the original blackboards in all classrooms. Building Exterior and Roof:
• None Identified Site Exterior and Concrete Foundation:
• None Identified Survey Areas Not Sampled but Assumed to Contain Asbestos
Based on the results of the visual inspection, the summarized inventory of materials that are SUSPECT AND/OR ASSUMED TO CONTAIN asbestos is described below: Building Interior:
• Interior fire-rated doors through-out the building. Building Exterior and Roof:
• Exterior fire-rated entrance doors on the south side of the building.
vi
Site Exterior and Concrete Foundation:
• Vapor barrier under the concrete slab on grade floor (where present) Survey Areas Found Not to Contain Asbestos
Building Materials: The summarized inventory of building materials tested and found NOT TO CONTAIN asbestos are detailed in Section 3.4 of the report. Site Soils: The hazardous material survey excluded testing soil for Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA). Soil testing for NOA was performed by the project geotechnical consultant, Geo-Engineering Solutions, Inc. Based on a review of NOA soil testing results provided by the project geotechnical consultant, NOA was not detected in the surficial soils and bedrock expected to be disturbed during construction of the new building at the project site. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY FINDINGS - LEAD Lead Survey Findings – Lead-Based Paint/Building Components The following is a list of building components and/or paint coating systems that were found to contain lead at or above the federal standard for lead-based paint (5,000 ppm or 0.5% by weight, or ≥1.0 mg/cm2). All homogeneous components located throughout the building shall be assumed as having similar concentrations: Interior:
• White Pebble Texture Coat (1.0 mg/cm2) – Interior column faces on all sixteen (16) columns located along exterior walls of the building.
Exterior:
• White Pebble Texture Coat (1.0 mg/cm2) – Exterior faces of columns on the north side (six columns) and east side (four columns) of the building.
• White Stucco Texture Coat (1.0 mg/cm2) – East-side building wall face.
• Lead Sheet Pipe Flashing (99% inorganic lead) - At all five (5) roof vent pipe locations. Lead concentrations reported above in ppm or percent by weight were determined by bulk sample analysis. Lead concentrations reported in mg/cm2 were determined by XRF. The XRF survey report is included in Appendix B. Note: Based on the XRF survey results, the lead-based white pebble texture coat was only found on the exterior columns on the east and north side of the Administration Building. The exterior building columns on the south and west side of Administration Building and the columns that support the Trellis/Portico structure have a lead-containing white pebble texture coat.
vii
Lead Survey Findings – Lead-Containing Paint/Building Components The following is a list of building components and paint coating systems that were found to contain lead at concentrations below the federal standard for LBP (<5000 ppm, or 0.5% by weight or less than 1.0 mg/cm2). Building components and paint coating system with lead concentrations below the federal standard for LBP are considered Lead-Containing Materials and are regulated by both Cal/OSHA and EPA. All homogeneous components shall be assumed to contain similar concentrations: Interior:
• Wall and Ceiling Paint Coating Systems (various colors - <100 ppm) - All painted wall and hard ceiling systems located in the interior of the building.
• Wood Trim, Door, and Door Casing Paint Coating Systems (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) - All painted wood wall trim, wood doors and wood door casings located in the interior of the building.
• Metal Lockers and Metal Door Systems (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) - All painted metal lockers (hallways), metal doors and metal door frames in the interior of the building.
• Ceramic Tile Wall Systems (0.58 mg/Kg) – Green ceramic tile in exterior accessed restrooms
• Ceramic Tile Floor Systems (7.3 mg/Kg) – Brown ceramic tile in exterior accessed restrooms Exterior:
• White Stucco Texture Coat (0.2 – 0.7 mg/cm2) – North, South, and West side building wall faces.
• White Pebble Texture Coat (0.2 – 0.5 mg/cm2) – Exterior faces of columns on the south side (six columns) and west side (four columns) of the building and all exterior columns that support the wood Trellis/Portico structure (thirteen columns).
• White/Beige Wood Window Casing (0 mg/cm2) – All painted wood surround casing on the exterior of the building.
• Metal Windows and Doors (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) – All painted metal windows, metal doors and metal door frames on the exterior of the building.
Lead concentrations reported above in ppm or percent by weight were determined by bulk sample analysis. Lead concentrations reported in mg/cm2 were determined by XRF. The XRF survey report is included in Appendix B. See Table 2A for results of paint chip analyses. The results of the XRF survey are included in Appendix B.
viii
Note: Should construction finishes with “detectable” concentrations of lead be disturbed, OSHA compliance measures and waste characterization measures for all lead-containing waste streams will be required. Lead Waste Stream Identification and Preliminary Waste Characterization Assessment Demolition Waste Stream Identification: As part of the lead survey, a demolition waste stream assessment was performed based on the lead-based and lead-containing building components and/or paint coating systems that were identified. Based on a review of the bulk sample and XRF data, the following waste streams were identified that will be generated during the demolition of the building have the potential to contain lead: Interior:
• White Pebble Texture Coat (0. 4 to 1.0 mg/cm2) – Interior column faces of all sixteen (16) columns located along exterior walls of the building.
• Wall and Ceiling Paint Coating Systems (various colors - <100 ppm) - All painted wall and hard ceiling systems located in the interior of the building.
• Wood Trim, Door, and Door Casing Paint Coating Systems (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) - All painted wood wall trim, wood doors and wood door casings located in the interior of the building.
• Metal Lockers and Metal Door Systems (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) - All painted metal lockers (hallways), metal doors and metal door frames in the interior of the building.
• Ceramic Tile Wall Systems (0.58 mg/Kg) – Green ceramic tile in exterior accessed restrooms
• Ceramic Tile Floor Systems (7.3 mg/Kg) – Brown ceramic tile in exterior accessed restrooms Exterior:
• White Pebble Texture Coat (1.0 mg/cm2) – Exterior faces of columns on the north side (six columns) and east side (four columns) of the building.
• White Stucco Texture Coat (1.0 mg/cm2) – East side building wall face.
• Lead Sheet Pipe Flashing (99% inorganic lead) - At all five (5) roof vent pipe locations.
• White Stucco Texture Coat (0.2 – 0.7 mg/cm2) – North, South, and West side building wall faces.
• White Pebble Texture Coat (0.2 – 0.5 mg/cm2) – Exterior faces of columns on south side (six columns) and west side (four columns) of the building and all exterior columns that support the wood Trellis/Portico structure (thirteen columns).
ix
• White/Beige Wood Window Casing (0 mg/cm2) - All painted wood surround casing on the exterior of the building.
• Metal Windows and Doors (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) -- All painted metal windows, metal doors and metal door frames on the exterior of the building.
Preliminary Waste Characterization Assessment – Waste Streams Not Requiring Additional Characterization: The following waste streams were determined not to require additional waste characterization based on the XRF and bulk lead sample data obtained during the survey: Interior:
• Wall and Ceiling Paint Coating Systems (various colors - <100 ppm) on drywall substrate - All painted wall and hard ceiling systems located in the interior of the building.
• Wood Trim, Door, and Door Casing Paint Coating Systems (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) on a wood substrate - All painted wood wall trim, wood doors and wood door casings located in the interior of the building.
• Metal Lockers and Metal Door Systems (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) on a metal substrate - All painted metal lockers (hallways), metal doors and metal door frames in the interior of the building.
• Ceramic Tile Wall Systems (0.58 mg/Kg) on mortar bed substrate – Green ceramic tile in exterior accessed restrooms
• Ceramic Tile Floor Systems (7.3 mg/Kg) on mortar bed substrate – Brown ceramic tile in exterior accessed restrooms
Exterior:
• White/Beige Wood Window Casing (0 mg/cm2) over concrete substrate – All painted wood surround casing on the exterior of the building.
• Metal Windows and Doors (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) over concrete substrate – All painted metal windows, metal doors and metal door frames on the exterior of the building.
• Lead Sheet Pipe Flashing (99% inorganic lead) on metal substrate – At all five (5) roof vent pipe locations
Preliminary Waste Characterization Assessment – Waste Streams Requiring Additional Characterization: The following waste streams were determined to require additional waste characterization based on the XRF and bulk lead sample data obtained during the survey:
x
• Waste Stream #1: White Pebble Texture Coat (0.4 to 1.0 mg/cm2) over concrete substrate – Interior column faces of all sixteen (16) columns located along exterior walls of the building.
• Waste Stream #2: White Pebble Texture Coat (0.2 to 1.0 mg/cm2) over concrete substrate – Exterior faces of columns on the building (sixteen columns) and all exterior columns that support the wood Trellis/Portico structure (thirteen columns).
• Waste Stream #3: White Stucco Texture Coat (0.2 to 1.0 mg/cm2) over concrete substrate – on exterior building wall faces.
The demolition waste streams identified above will need to be tested for total lead (TTLC) and soluble lead (WET and TCLP) to determine if the components will need to be disposed of as Construction Debris, Non-RCRA California Regulated HW - Lead or RCRA Hazardous Waste – lead. The specific method of sampling will depend on if the concrete will be recycled or if it will be disposed of to a Class II/III landfill. The specific sampling methods include the following: Method #1 – Concrete is Recycled: Based on discussion with local concrete recyclers, concrete to be recycled must be free of all paint coating systems that contain lead. This will require removal of the paint coating systems from the following building components and/or waste stream:
• Waste Stream #1: Building Columns (interior column faces) – There are sixteen (16) columns located around the perimeter of the building. The interior faces of these columns contain a white pebble texture coat containing lead between 0.4 and 1.0 mg/cm2. The texture coat is applied to interior surfaces of the concrete columns for the full interior room height.
• Waste Stream #2: Building Columns (exterior faces) and Trellis/Portico Structure Columns: The exterior faces of all the building columns and the columns that support the trellis/portico structure were observed to have a white pebble texture coat containing lead between 0.5 and 1.0 mg/cm2. The texture coat is applied to the full height of the columns.
• Waste Stream #3: Exterior Building Walls: The faces of all exterior walls were observed to have a white texture stucco coat containing lead between 0.2 and 1.0 mg/cm2. The texture stucco coat is located on all exterior wall faces of building exterior.
The individual waste streams will need to be kept separate for waste characterization purposes. Representative bulk samples from each waste stream will need to be collected. The sampling of each waste stream should follow procedures detailed in EPA SW-846. This will require collecting between three and six representative samples. Samples should be analyzed for total lead and soluble lead as shown in Figure 6. Method #2 – Concrete is Not Recycled: Where painted concrete will not be recycled, the demolition contractor will need to determine if additional waste characterization will be necessary to establish a waste profile for the concrete scheduled for disposal. Where determined to be necessary, representative samples will need to be collected. This would require collecting full-depth samples using concrete coring methods.
xi
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY FINDINGS - ORMS AND UNIVERSAL WASTES LEAD Survey Findings – ORMs and Universal Wastes The following ORMs and/or Universal Wastes were observed during the survey or are suspected to be present based on field observation. Quantity estimates for the ORMs and Universal Wastes identified below are presented in Tables 3 and 4:
• Mercury-containing Devices The following mercury-containing devices were observed or are believed to be present:
1. Fluorescent Lighting Fixtures (Tube) – The interior of the building contains multiple ceiling-mounted tube-style fluorescent light fixtures. A total of two hundred forty-eight (248) fluorescent light fixtures are estimated to be present in the building. For demolition purposes, each light fixture is assumed to contain two to four fluorescent light tubes.
2. Fluorescent Lighting Fixtures (CFL) – While not observed during the survey, the interior of the building may contain ceiling-mounted light fixtures that contain compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs). For demolition purposes, where present, CFL containing light fixtures are assumed to contain up to two CFLs.
3. Mercury-containing Thermostats – While not observed during the survey, up to four (4)
mercury-containing thermostats are believed to be present. There is believed to be one (1) thermostat for each HVAC unit.
• PCB-containing Device and Materials
The following PCB-containing devices were observed or are believed to be present: 1. Fluorescent lighting fixtures – A total of two hundred forty-eight (248) fluorescent
light fixtures were observed. The fluorescent light fixtures are assumed to contain one ballast, which may contain PCBs. The ballasts were not readily accessible during the survey because they were internally mounted. Internally mounted ballasts that were not able to be observed should be considered to contain PCB’s until removed from the light fixture and verified to be non-PCB containing. The total quantity of ballasts was estimated to be two hundred forty-eight (248) based on the observed quantity of fluorescent light fixtures.
• Low-Level Radioactive Materials (tritium containing exit signs and smoke detectors)
The following Low-Level Radioactive Materials containing components were observed or are believed to be present:
1. Exit Signs – The building was observed not to contain exit signs.
xii
2. Smoke Detectors – The building was observed to contain numerous smoke detectors.
The devices are in hallways, office, and classrooms. The locations of smoke detectors are shown on the fire alarm drawing for the building. A copy of the fire alarm drawing is included in Appendix C.
• Ozone Depleting Chemicals (compressor oils and refrigerants) The following components containing ozone-depleting chemicals were observed or are believed to be present:
1. HVAC System – The building is equipped with four (4) roof-mounted air conditioning
units. The interior of these units could not be accessed. Each unit should be assumed to contain compressor oil and refrigerant.
• Electronic Wastes The following components that would be classified as electronic wastes that were observed or are believed to be present include the following:
1. Digital Thermostats –– While not observed during the survey, up to four (4) thermostats
are believed to be present. There is believed to be one (1) thermostat for each HVAC unit.
2. Digital/Electronic Heat Detectors - The building was observed to contain numerous heat detectors. These devices are in hallways, office, and classrooms. The locations of the heat detectors are shown on the fire alarm drawing for the building. A copy of the fire alarm drawing is included in Appendix B.
3. Other Electronic Wastes – If other electronic wastes are found, they shall be disposed and/or recycled in conformance with applicable regulations.
The PUSD may require that fire alarm components, including the Fire Alarm Control Plan (FACP), smoke detectors, heat detectors and other components to be salvaged and returned to PUSD.
• Treated Wood Waste
Portions of the existing Trellis/Portico structure and wood trellis sunshade are constructed using pressure treated wood. The Trellis/Portico structure and wood trellis sun shades are scheduled for demolition. The pressure treated wood waste stream generated from this demolition would be considered treated wood waste (TWW). Base on the visual survey and field measurements, there is an estimated 32,360 board feet of TWW contained in the Trellis Structure. A breakdown of the TWW by dimensioned lumber size is presented in Table 4
An inventory of ORMs and Universal Wastes that were identified or suspected to be present based on the pre-demolition survey is included in Table 3. A break-down of the treated wood waste (TWW) by wood component size is provided in Table 4.
xiii
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ACM and ACCM
To comply with NESHAP and PUSD requirements, the following asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and asbestos-containing construction materials (ACCM) will need to be removed prior to demolition of the building:
• Resilient Floor Tile (RFT): RFT (gray-brown with black mastic, 5% Chrysotile) is present in the Janitor Closet (entire floor) and in the North Storeroom (approximate 80% of floor area). The estimated quantity is 110 square feet. The RFT shall be fully removed and disposed of as a Category I NF ACM where removed using manual methods. Where removed using mechanical methods, the RFT shall be handled, packed and transported as RACM (Friable Asbestos, California Hazardous Waste). The removal of the RFT will be coordinated with the removal of the ACCM drywall to minimize the number of containments to be constructed. OSHA Class II work practices shall be utilized.
• Sink with Soundproof Coating: One sink was identified as containing a soundproof undercoat. The sink is in the Work Room in the administration section of the building. The underside of the sink contains an ACM soundproof coating (black, 3% Chrysotile). The sink shall be removed intact using manual methods and OSHA Class II work practices and disposed of as a Category I NF ACM.
• Interior and Exterior Fire-Rated Doors (Suspect ACM core): The interior hallway doors and exterior doors are suspected of containing an ACM core. The number of suspect interior fire doors was estimated to be nineteen (19) with seven (7) suspect exterior fire doors. Prior to the start of abatement, suspect ACM fire doors shall be inspected to determine if they contain asbestos. This would be accomplished by drilling. Doors determined not to contain asbestos can be left in place or salvaged. Doors determined to contain asbestos will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of as RACM (friable asbestos). Friable asbestos is regulated as a hazardous waste in California. This will require transporting the RACM to a NESHAP permitted landfill under a hazardous waste manifest (RACM – Friable Asbestos, California Hazardous Waste).
• Under Slab Vapor Barrier (Suspect ACM): No original construct drawings were available at the time the pre-demolition survey was performed. An under-slab vapor barrier is suspected to be present below the concrete slab on grade floor. Prior to the start of abatement, the concrete slab on grade floor should be cored at a minimum of two (2) locations to determine if an under-slab vapor barrier is present. Where a vapor barrier is observed, the vapor barrier should be sampled and analyzed for asbestos. The vapor barrier is anticipated to cover the full building footprint. The building footprint is estimated to be approximately 12,600 square feet. Where the vapor barrier is found to contain asbestos, demolition practices will be implemented to maintain the vapor barrier in an intact condition while it is being exposed and removed. The vapor barrier shall be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of a CAT I NF ACM.
xiv
• Drywall Joint Compound (ACCM): The existing drywall system, except for the counseling office renovation area (former Classroom 18), was determined to be an ACCM (<0.25% to 0.5% Chrysotile). PUSD will require that the ACCM drywall system be removed prior to demolition of the building. Based on the building layout, an estimated 16,000 square feet of drywall is present. The drywall will be removed by putting the entire building within a Negative Pressure Enclosure (NPE). OSHA Class II work practices will also be utilized.
• Blackboard Shim Tile: Based on a previous classroom renovation, the original slate blackboards are anticipated to have shim tiles glued to the backside of the blackboard. Individual shim tiles are glued together to form a stack. The shim tiles are classified as ACCM (<25% Chrysotile). There is one original blackboard in each classroom. Assuming 8 blackboards, the quantity of blackboard shim tile was estimated to be approximately 45 square feet. PUSD will require that the ACCM shim tiles be removed prior to demolition of the building. The removal of the ACCM shim tile should be coordinated with the removal of the ACCM drywall. OSHA Class II work practices will also be utilized.
• Regulatory Requirements: Since the quantity of the ACM is greater than 100 square feet, the removal of the ACM will require the contractor to have DOSH registration as an asbestos abatement contractor for removal of the ACM. The contractor will also need to be a California licensed asbestos contractor1 and use asbestos trained workers and supervisor to remove the ACMs and ACCMs. During removal of the ACMs and ACCMs, work practices and regulatory notifications identified in the OSHA Asbestos in Construction Standard [CAL OSHA 1529] and BAAQMD Regulation 11, Rule 2 will need to be implemented by the asbestos abatement contractor. This will require the use of containment (NPE), regulated areas, wet methods, prompt cleanup of the ACM, placement in a leak-proof container, and perimeter air monitoring. If the contractor does not have a negative exposure assessment, contractor employee’s will need to set up a regulated area and wear appropriate PPE, including respiratory protection. ACMs identified as RACM will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in conformance with the requirements identified in CAL/OSHA 1529. RACM will need to be transported under a Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest as Friable Asbestos and EPA Waste Shipment Record. Category I non-friable ACM can be disposed of as Non-hazardous asbestos-containing waste under a non-hazardous waste manifest.
• Demolition of the building will be subject to Federal National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). Materials identified as ACM will need to be removed from the building prior to demolition. All ACM and ACCM removal will be performed within a regulated area including a Negative Pressure Enclosure (NPE).
• Removal of Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) greater than 100 square feet will require notification to BAAQMD to obtain a J number. In addition, demolition of the
1 California C-22 specialty license or California Contractor License (Class A or B) and asbestos certification pursuant to Section 7058.5 of the California Business and Professions Code (BPC).
xv
building is also subject to a NESHAP demolition permitting. NESHAP demolition permitting will require notification to the BAAQMD for the demolition of the building by completing BAAQMD Form 1102 (Demolition Notification).
Lead
• All lead in construction-related work shall be performed in conformance with OSHA Lead in Construction Standard [CAL OSHA 1532.1]
• Vent Pipe Flashing: The lead sheet vent pipe flashing at all five (5) roof vent pipe locations shall be removed. Since the flashing consist of lead sheeting, the lead sheeting should be recycled.
• Demolition Waste Streams - No Additional Characterization: The following lead-containing waste streams were determined not to require additional waste characterization and can remain in the building unless specified elsewhere to be removed as apart of asbestos abatement, for recycling and/or reclamation or salvaged for reuse by the PUSD:
▪ Interior Painted Wood Trim, Door, and Door Casing Paint - All painted wood wall trim, wood doors and wood door casings located in the interior of the building. Wood doors classified as fire doors are to be removed and handled a RACM.
▪ Interior Metal Lockers and Metal Door Systems - All painted metal lockers (hallways), metal doors and metal door frames in the interior of the building. Metal doors classified as fire doors are to be removed and handled a RACM.
▪ Exterior Metal Door and Window Systems - All metal doors and metal door frames on the exterior of the building. Metal doors classified as fire doors are to be removed and handled a RACM.
▪ Ceramic Tile Wall Systems – Green ceramic wall tile and brown ceramic floor tile in exterior accessed restrooms
▪ Exterior Painted Wood Window Casing – All painted wood surround casing on the exterior of the building.
• Demolition Waste Streams- Additional Characterization Required: The following demolition waste streams were determined to need additional waste characterization to establish removal and disposal requirements:
▪ Waste Stream WS-1: White Pebble Texture Coat over concrete substrate – Interior column faces of all sixteen (16) columns located along exterior walls of the building.
▪ Waste Stream WS-2: White Pebble Texture Coat over concrete substrate – Exterior faces of columns on the building (sixteen columns) and all exterior columns that support the wood Trellis/Portico structure (thirteen columns).
xvi
▪ Waste Stream WS-3: White Stucco Texture Coat over concrete substrate – on the exterior building wall faces.
The demolition waste streams WS-1, WS-2, WS-3 will need to be tested for total lead (TTLC) and soluble lead (WET and TCLP) to determine if the components will need to be disposed of as Construction Debris, Non-RCRA California Regulated HW - Lead or RCRA Hazardous Waste – lead. The lead waste characterization procedure is shown in Figure 6.
• Demolition Waste Stream Sampling Methods: The specific method for sampling procedure for waste streams WS-1, WS-2, WS-3 will depend on if the concrete will be recycled or if the concrete will be disposed of to a Class II/III landfill. The specific sampling methods include the following methods:
▪ Method #1 – Concrete is Recycled: Based on discussion with local concrete recyclers, concrete to be recycled must be free of all paint coating systems that contain lead. This will require removal of the paint coating systems from the following building components and/or waste stream:
➢ Waste Stream #1: Building Columns (interior column faces) – The white pebble texture paint coating is present on the interior column faces of all columns located around the perimeter of the building. Based on the site drawing, there are a total of sixteen (16) columns. The texture coat is applied to interior surfaces of the concrete columns for the full interior room height. The interior column faces are estimated to contain approximately 650 square feet of the white pebble texture paint coating.
➢ Waste Stream #2: Building Columns (exterior faces) and Trellis/Portico Structure Columns: The white pebble texture paint coating is present on the exterior faces of all the building columns and on all the columns that support the trellis/portico structure. Based on the site drawing, there are a total of sixteen (16) building columns and thirteen (13) trellis/portico structure columns. The texture coat is applied to the full height of the columns. The exterior building column faces and the trellis/portico structure columns are estimated to contain approximately 2,250 square feet of the white pebble texture paint coating.
➢ Waste Stream #3: Exterior Building Walls: A white texture stucco coat is present on the exterior face of all exterior walls. The exterior walls are estimated contain approximately 5,400 square feet of the white texture stucco coat.
The individual waste streams will need to be kept separate for waste characterization purposes. Representative bulk samples from each waste stream will need to be collected. The sampling of each waste stream should follow procedures detailed in EPA SW-846. This will require collecting between three and six representative samples. Samples should be analyzed for total lead and soluble lead as shown in Figure 6.
xvii
▪ Method #2 – Concrete is Not Recycled: Where painted concrete will not be recycled, the demolition contractor will need to determine if additional waste characterization will be necessary to establish a waste profile for the concrete scheduled for disposal. Where determined to be necessary, representative samples will need to be collected. This would require collecting full-depth samples using concrete coring methods.
ORMs and Universal Wastes Other Regulated Materials (ORMs) and Universal wastes that are present in the building will need to be removed. Handling and disposal of each material is discussed below
• Mercury-containing ORMs identified in the building will need to be removed prior to demolition of the building and disposed of in conformance with applicable laws and regulations. These include mercury-containing fluorescent lights (tubes and CFLs), thermostats, thermometers, and switches. A total of two hundred forty-eight (248) fluorescent light fixtures were observed. Each light fixture is assumed to contain four tubes.
• PCB-containing ORMs identified in the building will need to be removed prior to demolition of the building and disposed of in conformance with applicable laws and regulations. These include PCB-containing light ballasts. The total quantity of ballasts was estimated to be two hundred forty-eight (248) based on the observed quantity of fluorescent light fixtures.
• There are four (4) roof-mounted HVAC package units. Each HVAC package unit is anticipated to contain oil and refrigerant. These chemicals are considered ozone-depleting chemicals. The oil and refrigerant shall be removed and be recycled by an EPA-certified HVAC technician.
• Smoke detectors were identified as part of the fire alarm system in the building. All smoke detectors are to be removed prior to building demolition. The locations of the smoke detectors are shown the fire alarm plan for the building (See Appendix C). The smoke detectors may contain either low-level radioactive or electronic components that will require recycling or special disposal.
• Heat detectors and other fire alarm components were identified as part of the fire alarm system in the building. All heat detectors and other fire alarm components are to be removed prior to building demolition. The locations of the heat detectors are shown the fire alarm plan for the building (See Appendix C). The heat detectors and other fire alarm components may contain electronic components that will require recycling or special disposal.
• PUSD will not reclaim the pressure treated wood in Trellis/Portico structure or the building window trellis sun shade. All pressure treated wood will need to be handled and disposed of as Treated Wood Waste (TWW) under the alternative management standards (AMS) under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 34. This will require disposal to Class II/III landfill permitted to receive TWW.
xviii
Additional Considerations - Concrete A January 2014 EPA Regulatory Determination in response to a letter from the California Air Resources Board determined that concrete should be considered as a suspect ACM. The determination applies to heavy concrete structures, boiler housekeeping pad, and similar structures. In addition, subsequent EPA guidance has stated that where more than 160 square feet of concrete will be demolished and recycled, the concrete should be tested for asbestos. At present, BAAQMD is recommending that concrete that will be recycled be tested for asbestos. Local concrete recyclers that were contacted indicated that they do not require asbestos testing documentation. However, some local landfills have begun requiring documentation that the concrete has been tested for asbestos and requiring concrete with regulated levels of asbestos (asbestos content greater than 1%) to be properly packaged and transported in conformance with NESHAP and CAL/OSHA regulations. Based on the above, a supplemental survey was conducted. The concrete foundation system was sampled and was found not to contain asbestos. However, the general contractor and/or demolition contractor may need to perform additional sampling of concrete where required by concrete recyclers or by Class II/III landfills for waste profiling and acceptance.
xix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION .................................................................................................................................................................. PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND UNDERSTANDING .................................................................................... 1 1.2 SITE DEMOLITION AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ............................................................ 1 1.3 PRE-RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY SCOPE OF WORK ............................ 2 1.4 REPORT ORGANIZATION .............................................................................................................................. 4
2.0 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION SUMMARY ..................................................................... 5 2.1 RENOVATION HISTORY ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5
3.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY .................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 HAZMAT SURVEY SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 ACM SURVEY ........................................................................................................................................................ 6
3.2.1 ACM Survey Overview ................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.2 Survey Areas Found to Contain Asbestos ................................................................................................... 7 3.2.3 Survey Areas Not Sampled but Assumed to Contain Asbestos ............................................................... 8 3.2.4 Survey Areas Found Not to Contain Asbestos ........................................................................................... 8
3.3 LEAD SURVEY ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.3.1 Lead Survey Overview and Assessment Methodology .............................................................................. 8 3.3.2 Lead Survey Findings – Lead-Based Paint/Building Components.......................................................... 9 3.3.3 Lead Survey Findings – Lead-Containing Paint/Building Components .............................................. 10 3.3.4 Lead Survey Findings – Preliminary Waste Characterization ................................................................. 10
3.4 OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ........................................................................................................... 12 3.4.1 ORMs and Universal Wastes ........................................................................................................................ 12 3.4.2 Electronic Wastes ........................................................................................................................................... 14 3.4.3 Treated Wood Waste (TWW) ...................................................................................................................... 14
3.5 MOLD ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.6 NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS .................................................................................................... 14
4.0 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................................... 15 4.1 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL WORK - REGULATORY NOTIFICATIONS ........................................ 15 4.2 WORKER PROTECTION AND WASTE DEFINITIONS FOR ASBESTOS ..................................... 15 4.3 WORKER PROTECTION AND WASTE DEFINITIONS OF LEAD (IN PAINT AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) .......................................................................................................................... 16 4.4 WORKER PROTECTION FOR RESPIRABLE SILICA ........................................................................... 17 4.5 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS MANAGEMENT ................................................. 17 4.6 OTHER APPLICABLE REGULATIONS ..................................................................................................... 18
4.6.1 California Health and Safety Code (Cal H&SC) ....................................................................................... 18 4.6.2 Proposition 65 ................................................................................................................................................ 18 4.6.3 Hazardous Waste Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 19
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 20 5.1 ACM AND ACCM ............................................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 LEAD ...................................................................................................................................................................... 22 5.3 ORMS AND UNIVERSAL WASTES .............................................................................................................. 24 5.4 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS - CONCRETE ................................................................................ 25
6.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................... 26
xx
LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Page Table 1 – ACM Building Material Sample Results .................................................................................... T-1 Table 2 – Bulk Lead Results ........................................................................................................................ T-9 Table 3 – ORM and Universal Waste Inventory ................................................................................... T-11 Table 4 – TWW Board Inventory ............................................................................................................ T-12
LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page Vicinity Map.................................................................................................................................................... F-1 Site Plan ........................................................................................................................................................... F-2 Building Interior Bulk Sample Location Plan ............................................................................................ F-3 Roof and Building Exterior Bulk Sample Location Plan ......................................................................... F-4 Building Interior and Exterior Lead XRF Summary ............................................................................... F-5 Characterization and Disposal of Lead Waste Streams ............................................................................ F-6 List of Appendices Appendix A .................................................................... Asbestos and Lead Analytical Laboratory Reports Appendix B .......................................................................................................................XRF Survey Reports Appendix C .......................................................................... Administration Building Fire Alarm Drawings Appendix D ....................................................................................................................................... Photo Log Appendix E ....................................................................... Regulatory Information and Notification Forms Appendix F ................................ Hazardous Material Specifications and Hazardous Material Drawings* *Appendix F will be presented in a separate submittal.
xxi
ACRONYM GUIDE
ACM Asbestos-Containing Material
ACCM Asbestos-Containing Construction Material
Cal OSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administration
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDPH California Department of Public Health
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CPSC Consumer Product Safety Commission
DOSH California Department of Safety and Health
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
HSG Homogeneous Sampling Group
HUD U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
HVAC Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning
LBP Lead-Based Paint
NEA Negative Exposure Assessment
NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
PLM Polarized Light Microscopy
ppm Parts per million
PQL Practical Quantification Limit
RACM Regulated Asbestos Containing Material
RFT Resilient Floor Tile
STLC Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
(California soluble metal waste characterization)
TSI Thermal System Insulation
TCLP Toxic Characteristic Leaching Potential
(Federal soluble metal waste characterization: RCRA and Non-RCRA
TTLC
TWW
Total Threshold Limit Concentration
(California total metal waste characterization)
Treated Wood Waste
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND UNDERSTANDING Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD) intends to demolish the existing Administration Building (Building D), Trellis Structure and associated concrete surface treatments in the immediate vicinity of the Administration Building. The Administration Building is also identified historically as the 10’s Building. The Administration Building is part of the Piedmont High School Campus operated by PUSD. The Piedmont High School Campus is located at 800 Magnolia Avenue in Piedmont, CA. The Piedmont High School Campus site is shown in relation to the surrounding area on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The Administration Building is also shown in relation to the Piedmont High School Campus on Figure 1. The approximate demolition limits are shown in Figure 2. The demolition of the Administration Building will be subject to removal of hazardous materials covered under the federal NESHAP Regulation. To comply with NESHAP, a demolition-level hazardous material survey was conducted by Milani & Associates under contract to Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD). 1.2 SITE DEMOLITION AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS The approximate limits of demolition for the Administration Building Demolition Project are shown in Figure 2. The scope of the demolition includes the following:
• Removing building components scheduled to be salvaged,
• Performing necessary hazardous material removal and abatement prior to building demolition,
• Removing the wood trellis/portico roof structure and wood trellis-style sunshades,
• Demolishing the Administration Building,
• Demolishing the concrete building foundation system and concrete surface treatments scheduled for demolition, and
• Performing limited site grading. The demolition will include segregation of demolition waste streams for recycling and disposal. This will include separating pressure treated wood for disposal as Treated Wood Waste (TWW) where the pressure treated wood is not going to be reclaimed for reuse. The demolition of the structure will be subject to removal of hazardous materials and demolition permitting under the federal NESHAP regulation and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Regulation 11, Rule 2. To comply with the NESHAP regulation and BAAQMD regulations, a demolition-level hazardous material survey was conducted by Milani & Associates under contract to the Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD). The pre-demolition hazardous materials survey included the following elements:
• Inspecting and sampling the structure for Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM) for compliance with the federal NESHAP regulation and applicable federal and state Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations,
2
• Inspecting and sampling the structure (interior, exterior and roof) for Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM) for compliance with the federal NESHAP regulation and applicable federal and state Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations,
• Evaluating and sampling the structure (interior, exterior, roof and concrete foundation) for Category I Non-Friable (CAT I NF) and Category II Non-friable (CAT II NF) Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs). The evaluation included assessing if these materials could be made friable during the demolition of the building. Where these materials could be made friable during demolition, these materials would be re-classified as RACM and would be subject to the federal NESHAP regulation, applicable federal and state Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) regulations covering building renovation and/or demolition,
• Evaluating and sampling building materials, building components and paint coating systems for lead using bulk sampling and nondestructive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) testing for initial waste characterization purposes, and
• Inspecting the structure for the presence of Other Regulated Materials (ORMs) and Universal Wastes that may require removal prior to demolition, may require special handling and packaging or may require waste profiling to determine appropriate disposal.
• Sampling the concrete foundation system for asbestos as part of a supplemental survey. The scope of the pre-demolition survey did not include performing a mold survey, or sampling of the sub-slab vapor barrier or sampling of the underground utilities (electrical, water, sewer) for asbestos. The scope of the pre-demolition survey did not include collection and analysis full depth samples of add-on texture coats with lead-containing or lead-based paint coating systems for waste characterization. The hazardous material survey also excluded testing soil for Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA). Soil testing for NOA was performed by the project geotechnical consultant. 1.3 PRE-RENOVATION HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SURVEY SCOPE OF WORK Milani & Associates was requested by PUSD to perform a pre-demolition Hazardous Material Survey for Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs); Lead-based paint (LBP) and/or Lead-containing paint (LCP; and Other Regulated Materials and Universals Wastes within the Administration Building. Milani & Associates performed the following scope of services in conformance with Milani and Associates’ proposal dated July 11, 2017:
1. Review of Available Documents – Prior to the initial site inspection, the following documents were reviewed:
• University Associates, LTD., “Asbestos Inspection Report and Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) Management Plan, Piedmont High School”, dated May 1, 1988.
3
• J. A. Townsley Company, Inc., “Asbestos Triannual Re-inspection Report, Piedmont High School”, dated 1991.
• J. A. Townsley Company, Inc., “Asbestos Triannual Re-inspection Report, Piedmont High School”, dated 1994.
• Millennium Consulting Associates, “Hazardous Materials Survey Report - Fire Alarm Alignment – Piedmont High School”, dated September 3, 2009.
• Milani & Associates, “Limited ACM Survey, Inspection, and Testing, Blackboard Replacement and Disposal, Administration and Classroom Building "D", Classroom 12", dated December 5, 2016.
The results of the review were incorporated into the sampling and analysis plan and findings for the pre-demolition survey. Analytical results from the fire alarm hazardous material survey and blackboard replacement project were incorporated into Tables 1 and 2 as appropriate.
2. ACM Survey – An ACM survey of the structure was performed in accordance with the listed
criteria in California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal OSHA) standard under Title 8 California Code of Regulations (CCR) 1529, OSHA standard Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.1101 and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard Title 40 CFR Section 61.145 Subpart M (NESHAP regulation standard for demolition/renovation), including the analysis of bulk samples via polarized light microscopy (PLM) methodology.
The ACM survey was limited to the building interior, building exterior, building roof, building foundation system and associated wood trellis/portico roof and wood trellis sunshade areas of the building that are scheduled for demolition. The survey excluded underground utilities.
3. Lead Paint and Component Survey - A survey of the building was conducted for the presence
of lead-containing building components, lead-based paint (LBP) and lead-containing paint (LCP). The assessment for lead-containing components, LCP and LBP included bulk sampling of ceramic tile building components and conducting a non-destructive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) lead survey of the interior, exterior and roof of the structure. The XRF survey was used to analyze painted surfaces and architectural components for lead presence. Bulk samples of ceramic tile systems were tested for total lead for initial characterization for total lead (TTLC).
4. Other Regulated Materials (ORM) and Universal Waste Survey - A visual inventory and
reconnaissance of lighting and heating systems in the building for mercury and/or PBC containing devices (fluorescent light ballasts, fluorescent light tubes, and thermostats) were performed. The survey also included a visual inventory of low-level radioactive containing materials and components containing ozone-depleting chemicals where these components were observed to be present. An inventory of Treated Wood Waste (TWW) was also generated where pressure treated wood would be generated as a demolition waste stream.
5. Supplemental Survey – A supplemental survey was conducted on May 10, 2018, to sample the concrete foundation system for the building for asbestos.
4
6. Written Report - A written report was prepared to detail the survey information including a description of the samples and sample locations, analytical results in tabular form, the condition of surfaces identified, findings, interpretation of results, and recommendations.
The survey was limited to the interior, exterior and roof areas of the building. The Administration Building was in active use at the time the survey was performed. The initial pre-demolition survey was conducted on July 13, 2017. A supplemental survey was conducted on May 10, 2018. Reasonable efforts were made to access all areas and locate conditions/materials representative of the structure. The general site access was made available by PUSD. Survey activities were performed by Mr. Mark Milani, Cal/OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant 08-4469 and CDPH Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor #21323 and Mr. Jerry Lee, Environmental Technician with Milani & Associates. Previous asbestos and lead data from prior hazardous material surveys and waste characterization were utilized as reported. The scope of the pre-demolition survey did not include performing a mold survey, sampling of an under slab vapor barrier or underground utilities (electrical, water, sewer) for asbestos. 1.4 REPORT ORGANIZATION The Pre-Demolition Survey Report is organized into six (6) sections. Section 1 defines the scope of the pre-demolition survey. Section 2 summarizes information known about the construction materials observed in the structures that were subject to the survey. Section 3 presents the results of the ACM, Lead Paint and Other Regulated Materials (ORM) survey and analyses of bulk samples. Section 4 discusses regulatory considerations. Section 5 presents conclusions and recommendations developed as part of the Pre-demolition survey. Section 6 presents limitations. Figures and tables referenced in the report are presented in the tabbed Figures and Tables section of the report. The asbestos test results and lead results are tabulated in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. An inventory of ORMs and Universal Wastes that were identified or suspected to be present based on the pre-demolition survey is included in Table 3. A break-down of the treated wood waste (TWW) by wood component is provided in Table 4. Copies of asbestos and lead test results are presented in Appendix A. A copy of the XRF report is included in Appendix B. A copy of the Fire Alarm Drawings for the Administration Building are included in Appendix C. A photo log is included in Appendix D. Regulatory information and notification forms are included in Appendix E. Hazardous material specifications and drawings for asbestos abatement, lead in construction work and removal and disposal of ORMs are included in Appendix F. Appendix F will be prepared as a separate submittal from the pre-demolition survey report.
5
2.0 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION SUMMARY 2.1 RENOVATION HISTORY Based on a review of the AHERA management report, the Administration Building was originally constructed in 1978. PUSD personnel indicated that in the 1990’s, Classroom 18 was converted for use as counseling offices. The Classroom 18 conversion to counseling offices included installation of new partition walls, carpet, drop ceiling system, new HVAC ducting and new lighting. The original lighting system for Classroom 18, which is located above the new drop ceiling, was disconnected but not removed. 2.2 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION The Administration Building is approximately rectangular and occupies about 12,500 square feet. The building consists of exterior perimeter concrete columns with concrete tilt-up infill panels. The building is supported on a concrete slab-on-grade floor. The building does not have a crawl space. The building roof system consists of a wood diaphragm with a conventional built-up roof system. A wood-frame clay-tile screen system surrounds the roof-mounted HVAC units. Windows and exterior doors are constructed with metal frames. The building roof is surrounded by a wood trellis/portico roof system on the south side of the building and by wood trellis-style sun shades along the north, east and west sides of the building. Portions of the wood trellis and wood trellis style sunshades are constructed with pressure treated wood. The interior walls of the structure are finished with conventional drywall construction throughout the interior of the building. The exterior columns project into the interior building space. Ceilings in the classrooms and interior office areas are generally open exposing the wood underdeck of the roof diaphragm roof. The counseling office (former Classroom 18) has a drop ceiling with lay-in ceiling tiles with integrated suspended lights. The original light fixtures associated with former classroom use are present above the suspended ceiling system. The two exterior accessed restrooms have drywall ceilings. The flooring systems include conventional resilient floor tiles in the interior hallways and classrooms. The administration offices that comprise the central core of the building and the counseling office have carpet. The two restrooms are constructed with ceramic tile floors and full height ceramic tile walls. Rubber cove base of various colors is present throughout the building. The building was observed to contain four roof-mounted HVAC units. Interior HVAC ductwork is suspended from the ceiling and exposed. All exposed ductwork in the building interior uses mechanical connections. Exterior ductwork on the roof was observed to have duct tape on most connections. Mastics and/or sealants were present at all roof penetrations and counter flashings. All roof vents have lead sheeting flashings. The interior of the HVAC units could not be accessed. However, each unit is thought to contain a compressor and refrigerant reservoir.
6
3.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY 3.1 HAZMAT SURVEY SUMMARY The survey was limited to the interior, exterior and roof areas of the building. The Administration Building was in active use at the time the survey was performed. The pre-demolition survey was conducted on July 13, 2017. A supplemental survey was performed on May 10, 2018. Reasonable efforts were made to access all areas and locate conditions/materials representative of the structure. The general site access was made available by PUSD. Survey activities were performed by Mr. Mark Milani, Cal/OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant 08-4469 and CDPH Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor #21323 and Mr. Jerry Lee, Environmental Technician with Milani & Associates. Previous asbestos and lead data from prior hazardous material surveys and waste characterization were utilized as reported. The scope of the pre-demolition survey did not include performing a mold survey, sampling of sub-slab vapor barrier systems or underground utilities (electrical, water, sewer) for asbestos. The hazardous material survey also excluded testing soil for Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA). Soil testing for NOA was performed by the project geotechnical consultant. 3.2 ACM SURVEY 3.2.1 ACM Survey Overview A preliminary walk-through of the structure was performed to familiarize the inspectors with the structures and to identify suspect ACM containing components. During the walk-through, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) ducting; hot and cold water supply piping; other mechanical systems requiring thermal system insulation (TSI); and other suspect applications that were readily accessible were inspected for suspect asbestos-containing TSI, where present. The interior and exterior of the building were assessed for suspect Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) including suspect asbestos-containing surfacing materials and suspect asbestos-containing miscellaneous friable materials. The interior and exterior of the building were also assessed for suspect asbestos-containing Category I non-friable (CAT I NF) materials and suspect asbestos-containing Category II non-friable materials (CAT II NF). Friable materials (RACM) are defined as materials that when dry, can be crumbled or reduced to a powder by hand pressure. Category I non-friable materials are defined as packing, gaskets, asphaltic roofing materials, and resilient flooring materials and associated mastics in which the asbestos fibers are bound within a resinous matrix. Category II non-friable materials are defined as other non-friable materials such as transite in which the asbestos fibers are bound within a cement-like matrix. During the walk-through, homogeneous sample groups (HSGs) were identified. Based on the identified HSG and understanding of each building’s history, a bulk-sampling plan for suspect ACM was developed. Bulk sampling was conducted in accordance with modified procedures outlined in the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (40 CFR 763.86, Sampling). The procedure requires the inspector to select random sampling locations from homogeneous materials suspected to contain asbestos.
7
Fifty-five (55) suspect ACM bulk samples were collected from the interior and exterior of the building and from the asphalt and concrete pavement systems. The samples were sealed in uniquely labeled bags and shipped under chain-of-custody procedures to EMSL Analytical Laboratories (EMSL) located in San Leandro, CA. EMSL is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for the analysis of asbestos in bulk samples by EPA Method 600/R-93/116. Asbestos analyses included analysis by standard PLM. This was augmented by point counting (400-point count) on selected bulk samples where samples were identified as containing trace asbestos (Trace [<1% asbestos]). In addition, all drywall joint compound found to contain asbestos at less than 3% asbestos were also subject to 400-point count. The bulk sample locations are shown on the Bulk Sample Location Plans, Figures 3 and 4. The results of the asbestos analyses are presented in sections 3.2.2, 3.2.3, and 3.2.4, and are tabulated in Tables 1A, 1B, and 1C. A copy of EMSL’s NVLAP Certification is included in Appendix A.
3.2.2 Survey Areas Found to Contain Asbestos The summarized inventory of materials tested and found TO CONTAIN asbestos at concentrations greater than 1% that are regulated under AHERA as TSI, Surfacing and Miscellaneous and regulated under NESHAPS as CAT I NF, CAT II NF or RACM are described below: Building Interior:
• Resilient Floor Tile (RFT), gray-brown with black mastic, 5% Chrysotile [Miscellaneous/Category I NF ACM]
• Sink Soundproof Coating, black (1), 3% Chrysotile [Miscellaneous/Category I NF ACM] Building Exterior and Roof:
• None Identified Site Exterior and Concrete Foundation:
• None Identified
The summarized inventory of materials tested and found TO CONTAIN asbestos at concentrations regulated under OSHA (greater than 0% but less than or equal to 1%) is described below: Building Interior:
• Drywall Joint Compound, <0.25% to 0.5% Chrysotile (ACCM), by PLM 400-point count
• Blackboard Shim Tile, <25% Chrysotile (ACCM), by PLM 400-point count
The shim tiles are located behind the original blackboards in all classrooms.
8
Building Exterior and Roof:
• None Identified Site Exterior and Concrete Foundation:
• None Identified
3.2.3 Survey Areas Not Sampled but Assumed to Contain Asbestos
Based on the results of the visual inspection, the summarized inventory of materials that are SUSPECT AND/OR ASSUMED TO CONTAIN asbestos is described below: Building Interior:
• Interior fire-rated doors through-out Building Exterior and Roof:
• Exterior fire-rated doors on the south side of the building Site Exterior and Concrete Foundation:
• Vapor barrier under the concrete slab on grade floor (where present) Prior to the start of abatement, suspect ACM fire doors should be inspected to determine if they contain asbestos. This would be accomplished by drilling. In addition, the concrete slab on grade floor should be cored at a minimum of two (2) locations to determine if an under-slab vapor barrier is present. Where a vapor barrier is observed, the vapor barrier should be sampled and analyzed for asbestos.
3.2.4 Survey Areas Found Not to Contain Asbestos The summarized inventory of materials tested and found NOT TO CONTAIN asbestos, according to survey work, are identified in Table 1A for the building interior, in Tables 1B and 1C for the building exterior and roof. 3.3 LEAD SURVEY 3.3.1 Lead Survey Overview and Assessment Methodology Milani and Associates conducted a lead survey of the building. The assessment for lead-containing components, LCP and LBP included bulk sampling of ceramic tile building components and conducting a non-destructive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) lead survey of the interior, exterior and roof of the structure. An RMD Model LPA-1 XRF Analyzer (Serial No. 03494) was used to conduct the XRF Survey. The XRF survey was used to analyze painted surfaces and architectural components for lead presence.
9
Four (4) bulk samples were collected from the ceramic tile systems observed in the two exterior restrooms. The lead bulk samples were sealed in uniquely labeled bags and shipped under chain-of-custody procedures to EMSL Analytical Laboratories (EMSL) located in San Leandro, CA. EMSL is certified by the California Department of Health Services Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program for the various EPA and SW-846 Test Methods utilized for lead testing. A copy of EMSL’s California ELAP Certification is included in Appendix A. A copy of the lead XRF report is included in Appendix B. Bulk sampling for lead was performed in accordance with industry standards in existence at the time of the project. The XRF survey was performed in accordance with industry standards in existence the time of the project. Sample locations were determined based on the building components and paint coating systems observed during the inspection. The results of the lead bulk and lead waste characterization are presented in Tables 2A and 2B, respectively.
3.3.2 Lead Survey Findings – Lead-Based Paint/Building Components The following is a list of building components and/or paint coating systems that were found to contain lead at or above the federal standard for lead-based paint (5,000 ppm or 0.5% by weight, or ≥1.0 mg/cm2). All homogeneous components located throughout the building shall be assumed as having similar concentrations: Interior:
• White Pebble Texture Coat (1.0 mg/cm2) – Interior column faces of all sixteen (16) columns located along exterior walls.
Exterior:
• White Pebble Texture Coat (1.0 mg/cm2) – Exterior faces of columns on the north side (six columns) and east side (four columns) of the building.
• White Stucco Texture Coat (1.0 mg/cm2) – Eastside building wall face.
• Lead Sheet Pipe Flashing (99% inorganic lead) - At all five (5) roof pipe vent locations Lead concentrations reported in ppm or percent by weight were determined by bulk sample analysis. Lead concentrations reported in mg/cm2 were determined by XRF. The XRF survey report is included in Appendix B. Note: Only the exterior columns on the east and north side of the Administration Building contain the lead-based white pebble texture coat. The exterior building columns on the south and west side and the columns that support the trellis/portico structure on the south side of Administration Building have a lead-containing white pebble texture coat.
10
3.3.3 Lead Survey Findings – Lead-Containing Paint/Building Components The following is a list of building components and paint coating systems that were found to contain lead at concentrations below the federal standard for LBP (<5000 ppm, or 0.5% by weight or less than 1.0 mg/cm2). Building components and paint coating system with lead concentrations below the federal standard for LBP are considered Lead-Containing Materials and are regulated by both Cal/OSHA and EPA. All homogeneous components shall be assumed to contain similar concentrations: Interior:
• Paint Coating Systems (various colors - <100 ppm) – all interior painted wall and hard ceiling systems located in the interior of the building.
• Paint Coating System (various colors - 0 mg/cm2) – all interior painted wall trim located in the interior of the building.
Exterior:
• White Stucco Texture Coat (0.2 – 0.7 mg/cm2) – North, South, and West side building wall faces.
• White Pebble Texture Coat (0.2 – 0.5 mg/cm2) – Exterior faces of columns on the south side (six columns) and the west side (four columns) of the building and all exterior columns that support the wood Trellis/Portico structure (thirteen columns).
See Table 2A for results of paint chip analyses. The results of the XRF survey are included in Appendix B. Note: Should construction finishes with “detectable” concentrations of lead be disturbed, OSHA compliance measures and waste characterization measures for all lead-containing waste streams will be required.
3.3.4 Lead Survey Findings – Preliminary Waste Characterization As part of the hazardous material survey, preliminary waste characterization of selected building demolition waste streams for lead was performed to determine if the waste streams will need to be handled and disposed of a hazardous waste. Both XRF and bulk lead sample data were used for the preliminary waste characterization. The selected waste streams on which preliminary waste characterization was performed included the following: Interior:
• Ceramic Tile Wall Systems (bulk sample for total lead) – exterior accessed restrooms
• Ceramic Tile Floor Systems (bulk sample for total lead) – exterior accessed restrooms
11
Exterior:
• White Pebble Texture Coat (XRF) – all exterior faces of building exterior columns
• White Stucco Texture Coat (XRF) – on selected exterior building wall faces
• White Pebble Texture Coat (XRF) – all exterior columns that support the wood Trellis/Portico structure.
The results of the bulk lead sample analyses are included in Tables 2A and 2B. The XRF results are included in the XRF survey reports included in Appendix B. The results of the preliminary waste characterization are presented below. The following is a list of components that contained concentrations of lead from bulk sample analyses (total lead) that resulted in concentrations above the California Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC ≥1000 mg/kg by weight) that will require removal and disposal as a California Regulated Hazardous Waste for lead: Interior: None Exterior: None Based on the initial bulk lead sampling, no additional soluble lead testing (California Waste Extraction Test [WET] or Federal Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure [TCLP]) were determined to be necessary for the ceramic tile systems. The following is a list of building finishes and/or components identified through the XRF survey that could contain concentrations of lead (total lead) above the California Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC ≥1000 mg/kg by weight): Building Interior Columns:
• The interior columns were found to have a white pebble texture coat (0.4 to 1.0 mg/cm2). The texture coat is located on all the interior column faces at exterior walls. The texture coat is applied to interior surfaces of the concrete columns for the full interior room height. The substrate under the pebble texture coat is concrete.
Exterior:
• The faces of all exterior columns were observed to have a white pebble texture stucco coat (0.5 to 1.0 mg/cm2). The pebble texture coat is located on all exterior faces of both the building exterior columns and the trellis/portico support columns. The substrate under the pebble texture coat is concrete.
• The faces of all exterior walls were observed to have a white texture stucco coat (0.2 to 1.0 mg/cm2). The texture stucco coat is located on all exterior wall faces of building exterior. The substrate under the texture coat is concrete.
12
The building components identified above will need to be tested for total lead (TTLC) and soluble lead (WET and TCLP) to determine if the components will need to be disposed of as Non-RCRA or RCRA Hazardous Waste – lead. The specific method of sampling will depend on if the concrete will be recycled or if it will be disposed of to a Class II/III landfill. The specific sampling methods include the following: Method #1 – Concrete is Recycled: Based on discussion with local concrete recyclers, concrete to be recycled must be free of all paint coating systems that contain lead. This will require removal of the paint coating systems from the following building components and/or waste stream:
• Waste Stream #1: Exterior Building Columns (interior column faces) – There are sixteen (16) columns located around the perimeter of the building. The interior faces of these columns contain a white pebble texture coat containing lead between 0.4 and 1.0 mg/cm2. The texture coat is applied to interior surfaces of the concrete columns for the full interior room height.
• Waste Stream #2: Exterior Building and Trellis/Portico Structure Columns: The exterior faces of all the building columns and the columns that support the trellis/portico structure were observed to have a white pebble texture coat containing lead between 0.5 and 1.0 mg/cm2. The texture coat is applied to the full height of the columns.
• Waste Stream #3: Exterior Building Walls: The faces of all exterior walls were observed to have a white texture stucco coat containing lead between 0.2 and 1.0 mg/cm2. The texture stucco coat is located on all exterior wall faces of building exterior.
The individual waste streams will need to be kept separate for waste characterization purposes. Representative bulk samples from each waste stream will need to be collected. The sampling of each waste stream should follow procedures detailed in EPA SW-846. Samples should be analyzed for total lead and soluble lead as shown in Figure 6. Method #2 – Concrete is Not Recycled: Where painted concrete will not be recycled, the demolition contractor will need to determine if additional waste characterization will be necessary to establish a waste profile for the concrete scheduled for disposal. Where determined to be necessary, representative samples will need to be collected. This would generally require collecting full-depth samples using concrete coring methods. 3.4 OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
3.4.1 ORMs and Universal Wastes The following ORMs and/or Universal Wastes were observed during the survey or are suspected to be present based on field observation. Quantity estimates for the ORMs and Universal Wastes identified below are presented in Tables 3 and 4:
• Mercury-containing Devices The following mercury-containing devices were observed or are believed to be present:
13
1. Fluorescent Lighting Fixtures (Tube) – The interior of the building contains multiple ceiling-mounted tube-style fluorescent light fixtures. A total of two hundred forty-eight (248) fluorescent light fixtures are estimated to be present in the building. For demolition purposes, each light fixture is assumed to contain two to four fluorescent light tubes.
2. Fluorescent Lighting Fixtures (CFL) – While not observed during the survey, the interior of the building may contain ceiling-mounted light fixtures that contain compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs). For demolition purposes, where present, CFL containing light fixtures are assumed to contain up to two CFLs.
3. Mercury-containing Thermostats – While not observed during the survey, up to four (4)
mercury-containing thermostats are believed to be present. There is believed to be one (1) thermostat for each HVAC unit.
• PCB-containing Device and Materials
The following PCB-containing devices were observed or are believed to be present: 1. Fluorescent lighting fixtures – A total of two hundred forty-eight (248) fluorescent
light fixtures were observed. The fluorescent light fixtures are assumed to contain one ballast, which may contain PCBs. The ballasts were not readily accessible during the survey because they were internally mounted. Internally mounted ballasts that were not able to be observed should be considered to contain PCB’s until removed from the light fixture and verified to be non-PCB containing. The total quantity of ballasts was estimated to be two hundred forty-eight (248) based on the observed quantity of fluorescent light fixtures.
• Low-Level Radioactive Materials (tritium containing exit signs and smoke detectors)
The following Low-Level Radioactive Materials containing components were observed or are believed to be present:
1. Exit Signs – The building was observed not to contain exit signs.
2. Smoke Detectors – The building was observed to contain numerous smoke detectors.
The devices are in hallways, office, and classrooms. The locations of smoke detectors are shown on the fire alarm drawing for the building. A copy of the fire alarm drawing is included in Appendix C.
• Ozone Depleting Chemicals (compressor oils and refrigerants) The following components containing ozone-depleting chemicals were observed or are believed to be present:
1. HVAC System – The building is equipped with four (4) roof-mounted air conditioning
units. The interior of these units could not be accessed. Each unit should be assumed to contain compressor oil and refrigerant.
14
3.4.2 Electronic Wastes
The following components that would be classified as electronic wastes that were observed or are believed to be present include the following:
1. Digital Thermostats – While not observed during the survey, up to four (4) thermostats
are believed to be present. There is believed to be one (1) thermostat for each HVAC unit.
2. Digital/Electronic Heat Detectors – The building was observed to contain numerous heat detectors. These devices are in hallways, offices, and classrooms. The locations of the heat detectors are shown on the fire alarm drawing for the building. A copy of the fire alarm drawing is included in Appendix C.
3. Other Electronic Wastes – If other electronic wastes are found, they shall be disposed and/or recycled in conformance with applicable regulations.
The PUSD may require that fire alarm components, including the Fire Alarm Control Plan (FACP), smoke detectors, heat detectors and other components to be salvaged and returned to PUSD.
3.4.3 Treated Wood Waste (TWW)
Portions of the existing Trellis/Portico structure and wood trellis sunshade are constructed using pressure treated wood. The Trellis/Portico structure and wood trellis sun shades are scheduled for demolition. The pressure treated wood waste stream generated from this demolition would be considered treated wood waste (TWW). Base on the visual survey and field measurements, there is an estimated 32,360 board feet of TWW contained in the Trellis Structure. A breakdown of the TWW by dimensioned lumber size is presented in Table 4
An inventory of ORMs and Universal Wastes that were identified or suspected to be present based on the pre-demolition survey is included in Table 3. A break-down of the treated wood waste (TWW) by wood component size is provided in Table 4. 3.5 MOLD The scope of the pre-demolition survey did not include performing a mold survey. Consequently, no mold sampling was performed. 3.6 NATURALLY OCCURRING ASBESTOS While the hazardous material survey excluded testing soil for Naturally Occurring Asbestos (NOA), soil testing for NOA was performed by the project geotechnical consultant. Based on a review of NOA soil testing results provided by the project geotechnical consultant, NOA was not detected in the soils expected to be disturbed during construction of the new building. A full NOA assessment is included in the geotechnical investigation report.
15
4.0 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 Hazardous Material Work - Regulatory Notifications The following notifications will need to be prepared and submitted (where checked):
• Asbestos
☒ Bay Area Air Quality Management District – Form 1102 Demolition Notification
(Demolition only)
☒ Bay Area Air Quality Management District – Form 1102 Demolition Notification
(Asbestos Abatement)
☒ CAL/OSHA – Form 183B Temporary Worksite Notification for Asbestos Related
Work
• Lead
☒ CAL/OSHA – Lead Pre-Work Notification
☒ CDPH – Form 8551 Abatement of Lead Hazards Notification
• Waste Management
☒ City of Piedmont – C&D Waste Management Plan
The above notifications are in addition to the standard construction and workplace notifications required at construction sites by CAL/OSHA and other regulatory agencies. 4.2 Worker Protection and Waste Definitions for Asbestos The state of California has specific regulations regarding asbestos. California standards for the workplace are issued primarily by the California DOSH. Specific asbestos requirements are contained in Title 8 CCR Sections 1529 and 5208. The asbestos standard in Section 1529 applies to asbestos-related construction work, such as routine building maintenance, asbestos removal, renovation, demolition, excavation which may involve exposure to asbestos as a natural constituent, and asbestos spill/emergency cleanup. The asbestos standard in Section 5208 applies to general industry. These standards mandate an 8-hour Time-Weighted Average (TWA) Permissible Exposure Limit of 0.1 fibers/cubic centimeter (f/cc), and a 30-minute excursion limit of 1 f/cc. Employers conducting any operation involving the disturbance of materials containing asbestos and/or which may reasonably be expected to result in employee exposure above the action level and/or excursion limit must register with DOSH using the "Carcinogen Report of Use Form." This is a one-time registration; however, the employer must update the report and provide it to DOSH when there are any changes in report information.
Construction materials containing asbestos greater than 1 (>1%) percent are defined as an ACM and are regulated under both federal and state regulations. Constructing materials containing asbestos greater than 0.1% are defined as an Asbestos Containing Construction Material (ACCM) and are regulated by the State of California. CAL OSHA regulates the removal of both ACM and ACCM.
16
Please refer to Title 8 CCR 1529-Asbestos for the regulatory requirements associated with working with both ACM and ACCM. Additionally, refer to 8 CCR 1529(r)-Report of Use and Asbestos-related Work Registration for the DOSH registration requirement of contractors involved in asbestos-related work involving over 100 square feet of ACCM/ACM. In instances where a material contains asbestos in concentrations below the ACCM regulatory threshold (e.g. greater than 0% but less than or equal to 0.1%), the employer is required to comply with CAL OSHA 5194-Hazard Communication in addition to pertinent sections of 8 CCR 1529-Asbestos. The would include the used of HEPA-equipped vacuums, wet methods for removal and prompt cleanup under 8 CCR 1529(g). In California, ACMs that are friable or will become friable during abatement are classified as a California-Hazardous Waste and require special handling, packaging, and disposal. The local air pollution control district regulations should be consulted on how non-friable ACMs are classified for NESHAP purposes and when they are considered to be made friable upon demolition and/or abatement. 4.3 Worker Protection and Waste Definitions of Lead (in paint and construction materials) Title 17 CCR, Division 1, Chapter 8 covers the training, certification and work practices of individuals conducting lead surveys, writing lead work plans, monitoring abatement projects and those engaging in the abatement of LBP in relation to a public or residential building. The regulation also requires notification of abatement be provided five days prior to the start of work and that the notifications be posted at all entrances to the work area. Title 8 CCR Section 1532.1 covers work activities impacting LBP pose a potential exposure risk for workers and/or building occupants. Only workers trained in proper safety and respiratory techniques should perform renovation activities that may impact the LBP described in this report. All construction work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead must comply with Cal/OSHA requirements set forth in 8 CCR 1532.1. This regulation requires initial employee exposure monitoring to evaluate worker exposure during work that disturbs lead-containing materials (lead present in detectable levels). Milani & Associates suggests that engineering controls, respiratory protection, and personal protective equipment be employed at the start of any project that could disturb LBP. Other Regulatory Definitions of lead-containing materials are detailed in Title 8 CCR, Title 22 CCR, and Title 40 CFR regulations. CAL OSHA Regulation 8 CCR 1532.1-Lead regulates the removal of materials with detectable levels of lead. Please refer to §1532.1-Lead for the regulatory requirements associated with working with lead-containing materials. It is important to understand that CAL OSHA does not give a regulatory definition of a “lead-containing material”. CAL OSHA and Federal OSHA are concerned with “an employee occupationally exposed to lead”. This is understood to mean material disturbed during construction work containing lead in any amount (i.e., lead-containing paint and lead-based paint) is covered under the lead in construction standard. Additionally, Federal OSHA has determined that the use of XRF data and/or bulk sampling data (e.g., paint chips) are not acceptable for predicting employee exposures to lead. This fact means that contractors cannot use XRF data, paint chip data or bulk sample data as a surrogate for employee exposures during construction work (or the bidding process) as defined in 8 CCR 1532.1(a). The two OSHA interpretation letters below should be reviewed. Again, in summary, they state, the burden of proof is on the employer in regard to employee exposures to lead in construction work and not the reliance on XRF data, bulk sampling data or paint chip sampling data.
17
1. www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=23455
2. www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=22701
Current California and Federal regulations do mandate that generators determine if a waste is hazardous or non-hazardous by testing representative samples of the waste. The total lead by Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC), California WET-method Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC), and Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analyses should be performed to characterize each waste stream as Federal RCRA hazardous waste, California regulated hazardous waste, non-hazardous waste, or as construction debris. The waste stream must be handled as RCRA hazardous waste if TCLP lead levels exceed 5.0 milligrams per liter (mg/l), or as California-regulate hazardous waste if TTLC lead exceeds 1,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), and/or STLC lead exceeds 5.0 mg/L, respectively. By calculation, if a sample analyzed for lead by TTLC is found to contain less than 50 mg/kg, then the waste stream represented by the sample result is non-hazardous (a completely soluble waste at this concentration would produce a TCLP lead concentration of less than 5.0 mg/L). Similarly, total lead less than 50 mg/kg will generally produce an STLC lead concentration of less than 5.0 mg/L. The demolition contractor will need to determine if additional waste streams will require waste characterization and testing for proper disposal.
4.4 Worker Protection for Respirable Silica
Demolition and renovation activities that involve work on building components or materials containing silica and
concrete can potentially result in worker exposure to respirable silica dust particles. Employers must comply with
the requirements in 8 CCR 1530.1 to control employee exposures to dust created by operations conducted on
concrete or masonry materials
The revised silica standard that was published on March 25, 2016, and became effective in September 2017 for
occupational exposure to silica. Exposure to respirable silica is regulated by both OSHA and Cal/OSHA. Under
the newly implemented silica standard, the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for crystalline silica was reduced to
50 µg/m3 (micrograms per cubic meter of air) with an action limit of 25 µg/m3. In California, exposure to
respirable silica is regulated by CAL/OSHA under 8 CCR Title 1532.3. The regulation applies to all occupational
exposures to respirable crystalline silica in construction work, except where employee exposure will remain
below 25 micrograms per cubic meter of air (25 µg/m3) as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) under any
foreseeable conditions.
Employers will be required to monitor crystalline silica exposure if workplace levels may exceed 25 µg/m3 for at least 30 days in a year and provide medical monitoring to employees in those workplaces. In the case of construction workers, medical monitoring is required only if the new standards require workers to wear respirators for at least 30 days in a year. Construction industry employers are exempt from the PEL and exposure monitoring requirements if they comply with the engineering controls and work practices specified in the new standards. Specific engineering controls and work practices are identified in Table 1 of the standard.
4.5 Construction and Demolition Debris Management
To encourage Construction & Demolition (C&D) Debris C&D recycling, the city of Piedmont adopted a C&D recycling ordinance in February 2007. The ordinance requires projects within the city, where the total construction costs are projected to be greater than, or equal to $50,000 to divert 50% of their job debris from the landfill. The project applicant is required to submit the following prior to the start of construction:
• A completed and signed Debris Recycling Statement (DRS) prior to the issuance of a building permit.
18
• A completed Construction and Debris Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan (WRRP)
• A completed Construction and Demolition Debris Salvaged Materials Form (SMF)
Prior to the start of construction/demolition, the project applicant will also be required to submit a Drop Box – Dumpster Application. Richmond Sanitary Service has an exclusive franchise for the removal of solid waste and recyclable material from properties within the City of Piedmont limits. Richmond Sanitary Service, the City’s franchised waste hauler, will work with the project applicant to ensure that at least 50% of the debris generated is recycled. Richmond Sanitary Service will verify that the contents of the drop box were recyclable and recycled and submit to the City an accounting of the weight and types of materials diverted. Additional information is available at the following link: http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/publicworks/c-d-recycling.shtml Copies of the above referenced forms are included in Appendix E.
4.6 Other Applicable Regulations
The following regulations will apply to contractors performing work and building owners that contract with licensed contractors to perform renovation and/or demolition work.
4.6.1 California Health and Safety Code (Cal H&SC) On January 1, 1989, Assembly Bill 3713 mandated the addition to the California Health and Safety Code of Chapter 10.4, which affects owners of buildings constructed prior to 1979. The regulation details notification requirements for owners of buildings with known ACMs and/or ACCMs. The bill requires owners to provide written notices to employees, contractors, and lessees concerning matters related to ACM and ACCM. The notice must include (1) the existence of, the conclusions from, and the contents of asbestos building surveys, (2) specific locations of ACM and ACCM, (3) general procedures and handling restrictions to minimize asbestos disturbance, (4) results of any bulk analysis of air monitoring conducted, and (5) potential health risks associated with asbestos exposure.
For non-friable materials (i.e., material in which asbestos fibers are completely encapsulated), such as asbestos-containing resilient floor covering, notice must include (1) information described in Items 1and 2 in the preceding paragraph, and (2) warning that activities such as removing, sanding, scraping, etc. are restricted and should not be performed by unqualified employees. Notice in writing to each individual employee must be provided within 15 days of the receipt of information identifying the presence or location of ACM and ACCM within the building; annual notification is required thereafter. The regulation also requires the posting of warning notices in building areas where construction, maintenance, or remodeling may create a release or disturbance of ACM and ACCM.
4.6.2 Proposition 65 Proposition 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 took effect August 11, 2003, and is contained in the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) regulations, Title 27 CCR Division 2. This act states that no person in the course of doing business shall knowingly discharge or release a chemical known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity into water or onto land where such chemical passes or probably will pass into any source of drinking water, notwithstanding any other provision or authorization of law except as provided in Section 25249.9 of the regulation Asbestos was listed on the Proposition 65 list of
19
known carcinogens on February 27, 1987. Businesses are required to provide a "clear and reasonable" warning before knowingly and intentionally exposing anyone to a listed chemical. For asbestos, the level at which warning requirements are exempted, or the "no significant risk level" (NSRL) is 100 fibers inhaled per day or 140 million fibers ingested per day. The 100 fiber NSRL equates to an airborne fiber concentration of 0.00001 f/cc based on the inhalation of 10 cubic meters of air during an 8-hour workday. There are currently no validated sampling and analytical methods capable of detecting airborne fibers at this low level. For practical purposes, the Health and Welfare Agency has indicated that warnings must be posted when indoor airborne asbestos concentrations are significantly higher than ambient (outdoor) levels.
4.6.3 Hazardous Waste Criteria Wastes generated as part of a building renovation or demolition are required to be properly characterized and profiled prior to disposal in accordance with the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) regulations contained in Title 22 CCR. In California, friable asbestos-containing waste, containing more than or equal to 1% (≥ 1%) asbestos must be handled, transported, and disposed of as California regulated hazardous waste in accordance with the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) regulations contained in Title 22 CCR. Asbestos waste containing asbestos greater than 1% must also be disposed under the federal NESHAP regulation as Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RACM – friable asbestos) In California, lead-containing waste that contains lead at concentrations more than or equal to 1000 mg/kg (1,000 ppm) [TTLC] or more than 5 mg/L soluble lead by the California Waste Extraction Test [WET] must be handled, transported, and disposed of as Non-RCRA California regulated hazardous waste - lead in accordance with the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) regulations contained in Title 22 CCR. Where the soluble lead exceeds 5 mg/L by the federal Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure [TCLP], the waste must be handled, transported and disposed of as a RCRA hazardous waste – lead. Hazardous waste must be transported under a Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest. Friable asbestos waste (RACM) must also be shipped under an EPA Waste Shipment Record. A Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest can be made equivalent to an EPA Waste Ship Record by the addition of the following information: Amount of asbestos waste in cubic yards and Name and address of administrative agency (local air district). This information must be included in the comment section of the HW manifest. Hazardous wastes must be properly labeled. Hazardous Waste labels must conform to the following requirements: California Hazardous Waste Labels: Asbestos waste streams must be labeled with a hazardous waste label that meets the requirements in 22 CCR 66262.34 (e) and (f). When the waste stream is shipped across the public road, containers must have a label that meets 22 CCR 66262.32. Federal NESHAP Labels: Asbestos waste streams must be marked with signs that meet the OSHA hazards communication labeling requirements while in storage, and when being transported or disposed of to a permitted NESHAP Landfill.
20
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 ACM AND ACCM To comply with NESHAP and PUSD requirements, the following asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and asbestos-containing construction materials (ACCM) will need to be removed prior to demolition of the building:
• Resilient Floor Tile (RFT): RFT (gray-brown with black mastic, 5% Chrysotile) is present in the Janitor Closet (entire floor) and in the North Storeroom (approximate 80% of floor area). The estimated quantity is 110 square feet. The RFT shall be fully removed and disposed of as a Category I NF ACM where removed using manual methods. Where removed using mechanical methods, the RFT shall be handled, packed and transported as RACM (Friable Asbestos, California Hazardous Waste). The removal of the RFT will be coordinated with the removal of the ACCM drywall to minimize the number of containments to be constructed. OSHA Class II work practices shall be utilized.
• Sink with Soundproof Coating: One sink was identified as containing a soundproof undercoat. The sink is in the Work Room in the administration section of the building. The underside of the sink contains an ACM soundproof coating (black, 3% Chrysotile). The sink shall be removed intact using manual methods and OSHA Class II work practices and disposed of as a Category I NF ACM.
• Interior and Exterior Fire-Rated Doors (Suspect ACM core): The interior hallway doors and exterior doors are suspected of containing an ACM core. The number of suspect interior fire doors was estimated to be nineteen (19) with seven (7) suspect exterior fire doors. Prior to the start of abatement, suspect ACM fire doors shall be inspected to determine if they contain asbestos. This would be accomplished by drilling. Doors determined not to contain asbestos can be left in place or salvaged. Doors determined to contain asbestos will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of as RACM (friable asbestos). Friable asbestos is regulated as a hazardous waste in California. This will require transporting the RACM to a NESHAP permitted landfill under a hazardous waste manifest (RACM – Friable Asbestos, California Hazardous Waste).
• Under Slab Vapor Barrier (Suspect ACM): No original construct drawings were available at the time the pre-demolition survey was performed. An under-slab vapor barrier is suspected to be present below the concrete slab on grade floor. Prior to the start of abatement, the concrete slab on grade floor should be cored at a minimum of two (2) locations to determine if an under-slab vapor barrier is present. Where a vapor barrier is observed, the vapor barrier should be sampled and analyzed for asbestos. The vapor barrier is anticipated to cover the full building footprint. The building footprint is estimated to be approximately 12,600 square feet. Where the vapor barrier is found to contain asbestos, demolition practices will be implemented to maintain the vapor barrier in an intact condition while it is being exposed and removed. The vapor barrier shall be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of a CAT I NF ACM.
21
• Drywall Joint Compound (ACCM): The existing drywall system, except for the counseling office renovation area (former Classroom 18), was determined to be an ACCM (<0.25% to 0.5% Chrysotile). PUSD will require that the ACCM drywall system be removed prior to demolition of the building. Based on the building layout, an estimated 16,000 square feet of drywall is present. The drywall will be removed by putting the entire building within a Negative Pressure Enclosure (NPE). OSHA Class II work practices will also be utilized.
• Blackboard Shim Tile: Based on a previous classroom renovation, the original slate blackboards are anticipated to have shim tiles glued to the backside of the blackboard. Individual shim tiles are glued together to form a stack. The shim tiles are classified as ACCM (<25% Chrysotile). There is one original blackboard in each classroom. Assuming 8 blackboards, the quantity of blackboard shim tile was estimated to be approximately 45 square feet. PUSD will require that the ACCM shim tiles be removed prior to demolition of the building. The removal of the ACCM shim tile should be coordinated with the removal of the ACCM drywall. OSHA Class II work practices will also be utilized.
• Regulatory Requirements: Since the quantity of the ACM is greater than 100 square feet, the removal of the ACM will require the contractor to have DOSH registration as an asbestos abatement contractor for removal of the ACM. The contractor will also need to be a California licensed asbestos contractor2 and use asbestos trained workers and supervisor to remove the ACMs and ACCMs. During removal of the ACMs and ACCMs, work practices and regulatory notifications identified in the OSHA Asbestos in Construction Standard [CAL OSHA 1529] and BAAQMD Regulation 11, Rule 2 will need to be implemented by the asbestos abatement contractor. This will require the use of containment (NPE), regulated areas, wet methods, prompt cleanup of the ACM, placement in a leak-proof container, and perimeter air monitoring. If the contractor does not have a negative exposure assessment, contractor employee’s will need to set up a regulated area and wear appropriate PPE, including respiratory protection. The ACMs identified as RACM will need to be removed, handled, packaged and disposed of in conformance with the requirements identified in CAL/OSHA 1529. RACM will need to be transported under a Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest as Friable Asbestos and EPA Waste Shipment Record. Category I non-friable ACM can be disposed of as Non-hazardous asbestos-containing waste under a non-hazardous waste manifest.
• Demolition of the building will be subject to Federal National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). Materials identified as ACM will need to be removed from the building prior to demolition. All ACM and ACCM removal will be performed within a regulated area including a Negative Pressure Enclosure (NPE).
• Removal of Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) greater than 100 square feet will require notification to BAAQMD to obtain a J number. In addition, demolition of the building is also subject to a NESHAP demolition permitting. NESHAP demolition permitting
2 California C-22 specialty license or California Contractor License (Class A or B) and asbestos certification pursuant to Section 7058.5 of the California Business and Professions Code (BPC).
22
will require notification to the BAAQMD for the demolition of the building by completing BAAQMD Form 1102 (Demolition Notification).
5.2 LEAD All lead in construction-related work shall be performed in conformance with OSHA Lead in Construction Standard [CAL OSHA 1532.1]. Building components and paint coating system found to contain lead will be handled as follows:
• Vent Pipe Flashing: The lead sheet vent pipe flashing at all five (5) roof vent pipe locations shall be removed. Since the flashing consist of lead sheeting, the lead sheeting should be recycled.
• Demolition Waste Streams- No Additional Characterization: The following lead-containing waste streams were determined not to require additional waste characterization and can remain in the building unless specified elsewhere to be removed as apart of asbestos abatement, for recycling and/or reclamation or salvaged for reuse by the PUSD:
▪ Interior Painted Wood Trim, Door, and Door Casing Paint - All painted wood wall trim, wood doors and wood door casings located in the interior of the building. Wood doors classified as fire doors are to be removed and handled a RACM.
▪ Interior Metal Lockers and Metal Door Systems - All painted metal lockers (hallways), metal doors and metal door frames in the interior of the building. Metal doors classified as fire doors are to be removed and handled a RACM.
▪ Exterior Metal Door and Window Systems - All metal doors and metal door frames on the exterior of the building. Metal doors classified as fire doors are to be removed and handled a RACM.
▪ Ceramic Tile Wall Systems – Green ceramic wall tile and brown ceramic floor tile in exterior accessed restrooms
▪ Exterior Painted Wood Window Casing – All painted wood surround casing on the exterior of the building.
• Demolition Waste Streams- Additional Characterization Required: The following demolition waste streams were determined to need additional waste characterization to establish removal and disposal requirements:
▪ Waste Stream WS-1: White Pebble Texture Coat over concrete substrate – Interior column faces on all sixteen (16) columns located along exterior walls of the building.
▪ Waste Stream WS-2: White Pebble Texture Coat over concrete substrate – Exterior faces of columns on the building (sixteen columns) and all exterior columns that support the wood Trellis/Portico structure (thirteen columns).
23
▪ Waste Stream WS-3: White Stucco Texture Coat over concrete substrate – on exterior building wall faces.
The demolition waste streams WS-1, WS-2, WS-3 will need to be tested for total lead (TTLC) and soluble lead (WET and TCLP) to determine if the components will need to be disposed of as Construction Debris, Non-RCRA California Regulated HW - Lead or RCRA Hazardous Waste – lead. The lead waste characterization procedure is shown in Figure 6.
• Demolition Waste Stream Sampling Methods: The specific method for sampling procedure for waste streams WS-1, WS-2, WS-3 will depend on if the concrete will be recycled or if the concrete will be disposed of to a Class II/III landfill. The specific sampling methods include the following methods:
▪ Method #1 – Concrete is Recycled: Based on discussion with local concrete recyclers, concrete to be recycled must be free of all paint coating systems that contain lead. This will require removal of the paint coating systems from the following building components and/or waste stream:
➢ Waste Stream #1: Building Columns (interior column faces) – The white pebble texture paint coating is present on the interior column faces of all columns located around the perimeter of the building. Based on the site drawing, there are a total of sixteen (16) columns. The texture coat is applied to interior surfaces of the concrete columns for the full interior room height. The interior column faces are estimated to contain approximately 650 square feet of the white pebble texture paint coating.
➢ Waste Stream #2: Building Columns (exterior faces) and Trellis/Portico Structure Columns: The white pebble texture paint coating is present on the exterior faces of all the building columns and on all the columns that support the trellis/portico structure. Based on the site drawing, there are a total of sixteen (16) building columns and thirteen (13) trellis/portico structure columns. The texture coat is applied to the full height of the columns. The exterior building column faces and the trellis/portico structure columns are estimated to contain approximately 2,250 square feet of the white pebble texture paint coating.
➢ Waste Stream #3: Exterior Building Walls: A white texture stucco coat is present on the exterior face of all exterior walls. The exterior walls are estimated contain approximately 5,400 square feet of the white texture stucco coat.
The individual waste streams will need to be kept separate for waste characterization purposes. Representative bulk samples from each waste stream will need to be collected. The sampling of each waste stream should follow procedures detailed in EPA SW-846. This will require collecting between three and six representative samples. Samples should be analyzed for total lead and soluble lead as shown in Figure 6.
▪ Method #2 – Concrete is Not Recycled: Where painted concrete will not be recycled, the demolition contractor will need to determine if additional waste characterization will be
24
necessary to establish a waste profile for the concrete scheduled for disposal. Where determined to be necessary, representative samples will need to be collected. This would require collecting full-depth samples using concrete coring methods.
5.3 ORMs and Universal Wastes
Other Regulated Materials (ORMs) and Universal wastes that are present in the building will need to be removed. Handling and disposal of each material is discussed below
• Mercury-containing fluorescent lights (tubes and CFLs), Thermostats, Thermometers, and Switches: Mercury-containing ORMs identified in the building will need to be removed prior to demolition of the building and disposed of in conformance with applicable laws and regulations. These include mercury-containing fluorescent lights (tubes and CFLs), thermostats, thermometers, and switches. A total of two hundred forty-eight (248) fluorescent light fixtures were observed. Each light fixture is assumed to contain four tubes.
• PCB-containing Light Ballasts: PCB-containing ORMs identified in the building will need to be removed prior to demolition of the building and disposed of in conformance with applicable laws and regulations. These include PCB-containing light ballasts. The total quantity of ballasts was estimated to be two hundred forty-eight (248) based on the observed quantity of fluorescent light fixtures.
• Ozone Depleting Chemicals: There are four (4) roof-mounted HVAC package units. Each HVAC package unit is anticipated to contain oil and refrigerant. These chemicals are considered ozone-depleting chemicals. The oil and refrigerant shall be removed and be recycled by an EPA-certified HVAC technician.
• Low-level radioactive or Electronic Components: Smoke detectors were identified as part of the fire alarm system in the building. All smoke detectors are to be removed prior to building demolition. The locations of the smoke detectors are shown the fire alarm plan for the building (See Appendix C). The smoke detectors may contain either low-level radioactive or electronic components that will require recycling or special disposal. Heat detectors and other fire alarm components were identified as part of the fire alarm system in the building. All heat detectors and other fire alarm components are to be removed prior to building demolition. The locations of the heat detectors are shown the fire alarm plan for the building (See Appendix C). The heat detectors and other fire alarm components may contain electronic components that will require recycling or special disposal.
• Pressure Treated Wood/Treated Wood Waste: PUSD will not reclaim the pressure treated wood in Trellis/Portico structure or the building window trellis sun shade. All pressure treated wood will need to be handled and disposed of as Treated Wood Waste (TWW) under the alternative management standards (AMS) under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 34. This will require disposal to Class II/III landfill permitted to receive TWW.
25
5.4 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS - CONCRETE
A January 2014 EPA Regulatory Determination in response to a letter from the California Air Resources Board determined that concrete should be considered as a suspect ACM. The determination applies to heavy concrete structures, boiler housekeeping pad, and similar structures. In addition, subsequent EPA guidance has stated that where more than 160 square feet of concrete will be demolished and recycled, the concrete should be tested for asbestos. At present, BAAQMD is recommending that concrete that is scheduled to be recycled should be tested for asbestos. Local concrete recyclers that were contacted also indicated that they do not require asbestos testing documentation. However, some local landfills have begun requiring documentation that the concrete has been tested for asbestos and requiring concrete with regulated levels of asbestos (asbestos content greater than 1%) to be properly packaged and transported in conformance with NESHAP and CAL/OSHA regulations. Based on the above, a supplemental survey was conducted. The concrete foundation system was sampled and was found not to contain asbestos. However, the general and/or demolition contractor may need to perform additional sampling of concrete where required by concrete recyclers or by Class II/III landfills for waste profiling and acceptance.
26
6.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS Milani & Associates conducted the pre-demolition hazmat survey on July 13, 2017, in general accordance with industry standards for bulk asbestos sampling, bulk lead sampling and lead XRF procedures in existence at the time of the project. A supplemental survey was conducted on May 10, 2018 specifically for sampling the concrete foundation system of the building. Bulk sampling of the concrete was performed in accordance with industry standards for concrete bulk sampling in existence at the time the sampling was performed. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the applicable standards of our profession at the time this report was prepared. Copies of this report are furnished to provide the factual data that were gathered and summarized in the report. The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based in part on the data obtained from specific and discrete, representative sampling locations throughout the interior wall, floor and ceiling systems as well as exterior and roof systems. However, the nature and extent of variations between the sampling locations may not become evident until planned renovation and/or demolition procedures commence. If potential variations are identified during renovation or demolition activities, it may be necessary to conduct additional bulk sampling. The general and/or demolition contractor may need to perform additional sampling of concrete where required by concrete recyclers or by Class II/III landfills for waste profiling and acceptance. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Piedmont Unified School District for specific application to the locations where the survey was performed. This report may not be copied, except by Piedmont Unified School District, without the express written permission of Milani & Associates. No other representation, expressed or implied, is made.
FIGURES
PIEDMONT HIGH SCHOOL
LIMITS OF DEMOLITION
CLASSROOM 17
CLASSROOM 16 CLASSROOM 15
CLASSROOM 14
CLASSROOM 13 CLASSROOM 12
CLASSROOM 11
CLASSROOM 10
SOCIAL SCIENCEDEPT. OFFICE WORK ROOM CONF. ROOM LANGUAGE
DEPT. OFFICE
PRINCIPAL
MAIL ROOMCOMMUN.
NORTH HALLWAY
EAST
HAL
LWAY
WES
T HA
LLW
AY
OFFICE #
OFFICE #
DEAN'S OFFICE (ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL)
ATTENDANCE OFFICE
RECEPTION (ADMINISTRATION)
CLERICAL
SOUTH STORAGE
NORTHSTORAGE/JANITOR(CUSTODIAN)
NORTH STORAGE
NURSE (ATHLETIC DIRECTOR)
RESTROOM ENTRY(FACULTY)
EACH AC UNIT HAS ELECTRIC AND GAS
LEAD WRAPPED ROOFPENETRATIONS
ROOF PENETRATIONS
TABLES
Sample ID6 Homogenous
Sample GroupMaterial Description Material Location Condition Substrate Layer Asbestos Status
AHERA/OSHA
Category1,8
NESHAP
Category2,8
Cal/OSHA
Class of Work4
Quantity on-site
(sf or lf)Comments 9
g wood drywall ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall tape ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall joint compound2% Chrysotile (PLM, std)
<0.25% (PLM 400 Pt Ct) ACCM ----- -----
Approximately
16,000-16,200
sq.ft. for all
ACCM Drywall
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
g wood drywall ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall tape ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall joint compound3% Chrysotile (PLM, std)
<0.25% (PLM 400 Pt Ct) ACCM ----- -----
Approximately
16,000-16,200
sq,ft,for all
ACCM Drywall
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
g wood drywall ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall tape ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall joint compound2% Chrysotile (PLM, std)
<0.25% (PLM 400 Pt Ct) ACCM ----- -----
Approximately
16,000-16,200
sq.ft. for all
ACCM Drywall
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
g wood drywall ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall tape ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall joint compound2% Chrysotile (PLM, std)
<0.25% (PLM 400 Pt Ct) ACCM ----- -----
Approximately
16,000-16,200
sq.ft.for all
ACCM Drywall
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
Table 1A
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary - Administration Building Interior
August 20, 2009 - Millenium Fire Alarm Survey Samples
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
090820-905 -----
090820-906
090820-907
-----
-----
DWS, white
DWS, white
DWS, white
Admin Bldg (Building D),
Outside Counseling Office
[East Hallway, North Wall]
Admin Bldg (Building D),
Inside Room 12
[North Wall, NE Corner]
Admin Bldg (Building D),
Inside Room 16
[South Wall]
Admin Bldg (Building D0,
Inside Room 13
[North Wall, NE Corner]
090820-908 ----- DWS, white
T-1
Sample ID6 Homogenous
Sample GroupMaterial Description Material Location Condition Substrate Layer Asbestos Status
AHERA/OSHA
Category1,8
NESHAP
Category2,8
Cal/OSHA
Class of Work4
Quantity on-site
(sf or lf)Comments 9
Table 1A
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary - Administration Building Interior
August 20, 2009 - Millenium Fire Alarm Survey Samples
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
161130-101 1 Blackboard Mastic, yellow Classroom 12 Gray Black Slate Mastic ND N/A N/A N/A
161130-102 1 Blackboard Mastic, yellow Classroom 12 Gray Black Slate Mastic ND N/A N/A N/A
161130-103 2Blackboard Shim Tile, light gray
with black streaksClassroom 12
Yellow Mastic/
Gray Black SlateShim Tile
<1% Chrysotile - PLM
<0.25 Chrysotile - PLM, 400 pt ctACCM ----- -----
Approximately
40-45 sq.ft.
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
170713-15Mortar bed, lt. gray, under
brown tile
Bldg D, Mens RR, H/C Stall,
NE Cornerg concrete mortar ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-16Mortar bed, lt. gray, under
green tile
Bldg D, Mens RR, H/C Stall,
NE Cornerg concrete mortar ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-17 grout, brown off of brown tileBldg D, Mens RR, H/C Stall,
NE Cornerg mortar grout ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-18 grout, gray off of green tileBldg D, Mens RR, H/C Stall,
NE Cornerg mortar grout ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-19 grout, gray off of green tileBldg D, Mens RR, H/C Stall,
NE Cornerg mortar grout ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-20 grout, brown off of brown tileBldg D, Mens RR, H/C Stall,
NE Cornerg mortar grout ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-21Mortar bed, lt. gray, under
green tile
Bldg D, Womens RR, NW
Cornerg concrete mortar ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-22Mortar bed, lt. gray, under
brown tile
Bldg D, Womens RR, NW
Cornerg concrete mortar ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic carpet ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic cove base ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic carpet ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic cove base ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-25 12Carpet, brown with black
spots and yellow masticBldg D, office #1, NE corner
Bldg D, office #1, NE cornerCove base, tan, with white
mastic13170713-26
July 14, 2017
8
9
8
170713-23 10 gray Carpet with yellow masticBldg D, Mens RR,
NE Corner at door
170713-24 11Cove base, black 6", with
white yellow mastic
Bldg D, Faculty RR Waiting
Room, center North wall
November 30, 2016
T-2
Sample ID6 Homogenous
Sample GroupMaterial Description Material Location Condition Substrate Layer Asbestos Status
AHERA/OSHA
Category1,8
NESHAP
Category2,8
Cal/OSHA
Class of Work4
Quantity on-site
(sf or lf)Comments 9
Table 1A
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary - Administration Building Interior
August 20, 2009 - Millenium Fire Alarm Survey Samples
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
g wood drywall ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g joint compound tape ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall joint compound ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-28Dry Wall System (DWS), Tan,
field
Bldg D, office #1,
North wallg wood drywall ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic cove base ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic carpet ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-31LCT, white with random
holes and channels
Bldg D, Office #1 ceiling,
West centerg phlenum LCT ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-32LCT, white with random
holes and channels
Bldg D, Office #4 ceiling, SW
cornerg phlenum LCT ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-33Column Texture, white pebble
textureBldg D, Office #4, NE corner g concrete Column Texture ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713034Column Texture, white pebble
textureBldg D, Office #5, SE corner g concrete Column Texture ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic RFT <1% - Chrysotile (PLM, Std)
400 Pt Ct not
requested for RFT,
Mastic is ACM
g concrete mastic 5% - Chrysotile (PLM, Std) ACM
g mastic RFT <1% - Chrysotile (PLM, Std)
400 Pt Ct not
requested for RFT,
Mastic is ACM
g concrete mastic Positive Stop, (Not Analyzed) ACM
g mastic RFT ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-38 19 Sink Sound Proofing, BlackBldg D, workroom, South
wall, centerg metal soundproofing 3% - Chrysotile (PLM, Std) ACM CAT I NF Class II 4 sq.ft.
Dispose of as CAT I Non-
Friable ACM.
g mastic carpet ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Cove base, tan, with white
mastic
170713-30 12
170713-37 18
RFT, gray brown with white
and brown striations, yellow
mastic
170713-27
14
Dry Wall System (DWS), Tan,
with tape and joint
compound, corner
1. Dispose of as CAT I Non-
Friable ACM.
2. Reclassify as RACM and
dispose of as California
Regulated Hazardous
Waste - Friable Asbestos if
mechanical methods are
used to remove RFT and
Mastic.
CAT I NF Class II 53 sq. ft.
CAT I NF Class II 55 sq.ft.
Bldg D, office #1, NW corner
Bldg D, office #1, NE corner
170713-29 Bldg D, office #1, NE corner13
RFT, gray brown striations,
black mastic
RFT, gray brown striations,
black mastic
Bldg D, Janitor Closet, SE
corner
Bldg D, North Storage
Room, SW corner
Bldg D, North Storage Room,
SW corner
170713-39 20Carpet tile, blue gray with
yellow mastic
Bldg D, South floor,
workroom, at door
15
16
170713-36
170713-35
17
Carpet, brown with black
spots and yellow mastic
T-3
Sample ID6 Homogenous
Sample GroupMaterial Description Material Location Condition Substrate Layer Asbestos Status
AHERA/OSHA
Category1,8
NESHAP
Category2,8
Cal/OSHA
Class of Work4
Quantity on-site
(sf or lf)Comments 9
Table 1A
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary - Administration Building Interior
August 20, 2009 - Millenium Fire Alarm Survey Samples
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
g wood drywall ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g joint compound tape ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall joint compound<1% - Chrysotile (PLM, Std)
0.25% Chrysotile (PLM 400 Pt Ct)ACCM ----- -----
Approximately
16,000-16,200
sq.ft. for all
ACCM Drywall
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
g mastic cove base ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g compound mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall compound<1% Chrysotile (PLM Std)
0.50% Chrysotile (PLM 400 Pt Ct)ACCM ----- -----
Approximately
16,000-16,200
sq.ft. for all
ACCM Drywall
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
g mastic carpet ND ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g wood drywall ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g joint compound tape ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall joint compound2% Chrysotile (PLM, Std)
<0.25% Chrysotile (PLM 400 Pt Ct)ACCM ----- ----- -----
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
Bldg D, workroom, E. wall,
S corner
11170713-41
170713-43 22
21170713-40DWS, yellow white with
tape and joint compound
DWS, white, with tape and
joint compound
Bldg D, Admin Reception,
NE corner
Covebase, black 6", with
yellow mastic
Bldg D, workroom, East
wall, South corner
20170713-42Carpet, blue gray with yellow
mastic
Bldg D, Admin Reception,
NE corner
T-4
Sample ID6 Homogenous
Sample GroupMaterial Description Material Location Condition Substrate Layer Asbestos Status
AHERA/OSHA
Category1,8
NESHAP
Category2,8
Cal/OSHA
Class of Work4
Quantity on-site
(sf or lf)Comments 9
Table 1A
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary - Administration Building Interior
August 20, 2009 - Millenium Fire Alarm Survey Samples
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
g mastic covebase ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g compound mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall compound2% Chrysotile (PLM, Std)
<0.25% Chrysotile (PLM 400 Pt Ct)ACCM -----
Approximately
16,000-16,200
sq.ft. for all
ACCM Drywall
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
g mastic carpet ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-46 16 Column texture, white Bldg D, Room 16 NE Corner g concrete column texture ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic covebase ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g compound mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall compound<1% Chrysotile (PLM, Std)
0.25% Chrysotile (PLM 400 Pt Ct) ACCM CAT I NF
Approximately
16,000-16,200
sq.ft. for all
ACCM Drywall
1. All ACCM to be removed
prior to demolilition.
2. Dispose of as non-
hazardous asbestos-
containing construction
waste
g mastic RFT ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic RFT ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g concrete mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g mastic covebase ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g drywall mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Notes:
5. ND = No asbestos detected in sample
6. Note: Items not in numerical order have been grouped and sorted by homogeneous material
7. DWS = Drywall System. System includes drywall, tape, and joint compound/taping mud
8. Texture Coat (TC) - Classified as an add-on coating by OSHA. Not classfied as an AHERA surfacing material.
9. Unless specified for removal, material can remain in place during demolition
11. H/C = Handicapped Stall
12. RR = Restroom
Carpet, blue, yellow, white
pebble pattern with yellow
mastic
Bldg D, Room 16 NE Corner
10. All bulk samples collected by Milani and Associates except where noted in table. Bulk samples by others were used as reported.
4. OSHA Class of Work - Applies to removal and/or disturbance of buidling materials with >1% asbestos content (Class I, Class II, Class III, Class IV). OSHA regulates removal of all materials that contain asbestos greater that 0% under Title 8 CCR 1529.
2. NESHAP Category - For Renovation and/or Demolition identification for Category I Non-Friable [CAT I], Category II Non-Friable [CAT II], or friable materials (Regulated ACM [RACM]) with > 1% asbestos content.
3. Asbestos-containing construction material (ACCM)- Building materials with asbestos content > 0.1% but ≤ 1%.
1. AHERA Category - Materials classified as TSI, Surfacing or Miscellaneous
170713-45 24
170713-50 27Covebase, black 4" with
yellow mastic
Bldg D, East Hallway, North
wall, center locker
Bldg D, East Hallway,
SW corner
Bldg D, East Hallway,
West wall center
170713-49
26RFT, lt. gray with dark gray
lineations and yellow brown
mastic
Bldg D, North Hallway, South
wall center
170713-47
170713-48
11Cove base, black 6" with
yellow mastic
RFT, lt. gray with dark gray
lineations and yellow brown
mastic
23170713-44Cove base, gray brown with
yellow mastic
Bldg D, Room 16 NE
Corner
T-5
Sample ID6,9 Homogenous
Sample GroupMaterial Description Material Location Condition Substrate Layer Asbestos Status
AHERA
Category1,8
NESHAP
Category2,8
Cal/OSHA
Class of Work4
Quantity on-site
(sf or lf)
Comments/
Quantity (sf) 9
Composition Roof g tar Comp. Roof ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Tar g felt tar ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Felt g wood felt ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Composition Roof g tar Comp. Roof ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Tar g felt tar ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Felt g wood felt ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Composition Roof A g tar Comp. Roof ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Tar g felt tar ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Felt g wood felt ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g tar Comp. Roof ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g felt tar ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
g wood felt ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-05 Roof Tile Vapor Barrier, black Bldg D, Roof Tile, S.W. center g wood vapor barrier ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-06 Roof Tile Vapor Barrier, black Bldg. D, Roof Tile, S.E. center g wood vapor barrier ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-07 4 Flashing Mastic, white Trellis Roof, S. edge g metal mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-08 Penetration Mastic, Black Trellis Roof, N.E. Corner g metal mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-09 Penetration Mastic, Black Trellis Roof, N.W. Corner g metal mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-10 Flashing Mastic, grey Bldg D, Roof, N.W. corner g metal mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-11 Flashing Mastic, grey Bldg.D, Roof N.E. corner g metal mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-12Flashing Mastic, Dark Grey,
Flashing cap on post
Bldg D, Roof, Flashing cap on
post N.E. cornerg wood mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-13Flashing Mastic, Dark Grey,
Flashing cap on post
Bldg D, Roof, Flashing cap on
post N.W. cornerg wood mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-14Flashing Mastic, Dark Grey,
Water Spigot Sleeve
Bldg D, Roof, N. center under tile
roofg metal mastic ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-51 28Exterior Column Stucco,
whiteBldg D, S.W. corner column g concrete stucco ND ----- ---- ----- ----- -----
July 14, 2017
Table 1B
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary - Exterior and Roof
Bldg D, Roof A S.W. corner field
Composition Roof A Bldg D, Roof A N.E. corner field
170713-01 1
170713-02 1
Roof B "trellis roof" N.E. Corner
Field
Roof B "trellis roof" N.W. Corner
Field
7
5
6
3
170713-03
170713-04
2
2
T-6
Sample ID6,9 Homogenous
Sample GroupMaterial Description Material Location Condition Substrate Layer Asbestos Status
AHERA
Category1,8
NESHAP
Category2,8
Cal/OSHA
Class of Work4
Quantity on-site
(sf or lf)
Comments/
Quantity (sf) 9
July 14, 2017
Table 1B
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
Asbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary - Exterior and Roof
170713-01 1Roof B "trellis roof" N.E. Corner
Field
170713-53 30 Door Caulking, greyBldg D, Exterior, West Hallway
door, West side, lowg metal caulking ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-54 31 Stucco, white upper exteriorBldg D, Exterior East Wall, North
center at column 3g concrete stucco ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
170713-55 32Spray coating, white on
concrete, lower
Bldg D, Exterior East Wall, North
center at column 3g concrete stucco ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
180510-101 33 Concrete, Gray Bldg D Southwest Exterior Door g N/A concrete ND ----- ----- ----- -----no substrate for a concrete
slab
Notes:
5. ND = No asbestos detected in sample
6. Note: Items not in numerical order have been grouped and sorted by homogeneous material
7. DWS = Drywall System. System includes drywall, tape, and joint compound/taping mud
8. Texture Coat (TC) - Classified as an add-on coating by OSHA. Not classfied as an AHERA surfacing material.
9. Unless specified for removal, material can remain in place during demolition
May 10, 2018
1. AHERA Category - Materials classified as TSI, Surfacing or Miscellaneous
2. NESHAP Category - For Renovation and/or Demolition identification for Category I Non-Friable [CAT I], Category II Non-Friable [CAT II], or friable materials (Regulated ACM [RACM]) with > 1% asbestos content.
3. Asbestos-containing construction material (ACCM)- Building materials with asbestos content > 0.1% but ≤ 1%.4. OSHA Class of Work - Applies to removal and/or disturbance of buidling materials with >1% asbestos content (Class I, Class II, Class III, Class IV). OSHA regulates removal of all materials that contain asbestos greater that 0% under Title 8 CCR 1529.
10. All bulk samples collected by Milani and Associates except where noted in table. Bulk samples by others were used as reported.
T-7
Sample ID7 Homogenous
SampleMaterial Description Material Location Condition Substrate Layer Asbestos Status
AHERA
Category1,5
NESHAP
Category2,5
Cal/OSHA Class
of Work3
Quantity on-site (sf
or lf)Comments/Quantity (sf)
8
170713-52 29 Sealant, greyBldg D, Sidewalk Expansion
Joint, SW cornerg concrete sealant ND ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Notes:
8. Texture Coat (TC) - Classified as an add-on coating by OSHA. Not classfied as an AHERA surfacing material.
Table 1C
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
July 14, 2017
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CAAsbestos Bulk Sample Analytical Summary - Site
6. Note: Items not in numerical order have been grouped and sorted by homogeneous material
5. ND = No asbestos detected in sample
1. AHERA Category - Materials classified as TSI, Surfacing or Miscellaneous
2. NESHAP Category - For Renovation and/or Demolition identification for Category I Non-Friable [CAT I], Category II Non-Friable [CAT II], or friable materials (Regulated ACM [RACM]) with > 1% asbestos content.
3. Asbestos-containing construction material (ACCM)- Building materials with asbestos content > 0.1% but ≤ 1%.4. OSHA Class of Work - Applies to removal and/or disturbance of buidling materials with >1% asbestos content (Class I, Class II, Class III, Class IV). OSHA regulates removal of all materials that contain asbestos greater that 0% under Title 8 CCR 1529.
7. DWS = Drywall System. System includes drywall, tape, and joint compound/taping mud
T-8
Sample ID Sample Type Material Description Material Location2 Condition Substrate Layer
Lead
Concentration
(ppm)1
Lead
Concentration
(W%)1
Lead ClassifcationQuantity on-site
(sq ft or lf)Comments
090820-904L Paint Chip Paint, Off white
Admin Building (Building D)
outside Counseling Office
[East Hallway, North Wall, NE]
Intact drywall paint <100 <0.0100 Lead-containing N/A
090820-905L Paint Chip Paint, CreamAdmin Building (Building D) Inside
Room 16 [South Wall]Intact drywall paint <100 <0.0100 Lead-containing N/A
090820-906L Paint Chip Paint, CreamAdmin Building (Building D) Inside
Room 13 [North Wall]Intact drywall paint <100 <0.0100 Lead-containing N/A
090820-907L Paint Chip Paint, Off white
Admin Building (Building D)
outside Room 12 [West Hallway,
West Wall, SW Corner]
Intact drywall paint <100 <0.0100 Lead-containing N/A
170713-101L Bulk Ceramic floor tile, brownBldg D, Mens RR floor, H/C stall
NE corner floorIntact mortar ceramic tile 7.3 0.00073 Lead-containing N/A
170713-102L Bulk Ceramic floor tile, brownBldg D, Womens RR floor, NW
corner floorIntact mortar ceramic tile 0.55 0.000055 Lead-containing N/A
170713-103L Bulk Ceramic wall tile, greenBldg D, Mens RR floor, H/C stall
NE corner wallIntact mortar ceramic tile 0.58 0.000058 Lead-containing N/A
170713-104L Bulk Ceramic wall tile, greenBldg D, Womens RR floor, NW
corner wallIntact mortar ceramic tile ND(0.50) ND
Non-Lead
ContainingN/A
Notes:
2. Abbreviations: H/C = Handicapped, RR = Restroom
3. N/A = Not Applicable
1. ND () = No lead detected in sample above method detection limit (mdl). MDL in ( ).
Table 2A
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
August 20, 2009 - Millenium Fire Alarm Survey Samples
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
Lead Bulk Sample Analytical Summary
July 13, 2017
No additional lead waste
characterization required.
Remove and dispose of ceramic
tile with building demolition
waste.
No additional lead waste
characterization required.
Remove and dispose of ceramic
tile with building demolition
waste.
No additional lead waste
characterization required.
Drywall is ACCM. See Table 1A
for quantity, handling and
disposal.
T-9
Sample ID Material Description Material Location4 Condition Substrate Layer
Total Lead
Concentration
(mg/Kg)2
Total Lead
Concentration
(W%)2
Soluble Lead
Concentration
(mg/L)
Lead Load
(mg/cm2)
Lead ClassifcationQuantity on-site
(sf or lf)Comments 1
WS-1 White Pebble Texture Coat Interior Building Column Faces Intact Concrete Paint Coating ----- ----- ----- 0.4 - 1.0 Lead Containing 650 sfFull Waste Characterization required
(Total and Soluble Lead)
WS-2 White Pebble Texture Coat Exterior Building Column Faces
Trellis/Portico Column FacesIntact Concrete Paint Coating ----- ----- ----- 0.5 - 1.0 Lead Containing 2,250 sf
Full Waste Characterization required
(Total and Soluble Lead)
WS-3 White Stucco Texture Coat Exterior Building Wall Faces Intact Concrete Paint Coating ----- ----- ----- 0.2 - 1.0 Lead Containing 5,400 sfFull Waste Characterization required
(Total and Soluble Lead)
1,000 0.1 ----- -----
----- ----- 5 -----
----- ----- 5 -----
Notes:
1. See Figure 5 for Lead Waste Characterization Sampling and Analysis Procedure.
2. ----- = Analysis not performed or no data available
Table 2B
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
Lead Bulk Waste Characterization Summary - Building Interior & Exterior
July 13, 2017
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
Federal TCLP (mg/L)
California TTLC
Regulatory Limits
California STLC (mg/L)
T-10
Component Regulated Material Building Location Description/Note Estimated Quantity1,2,3
Lighting - Fluorescent Light (Tubes) Mercury Bldg D Interior 474 total bulbs, various lenghts 474
Lighting - Compact Fluorescent Light (CFLs) Mercury Bldg D Interior/Exterior None Observed 0
Lighting Ballasts PCBs Bldg D Interior 248 fixtures, 1 ballast per fixutre 248
Pressure Treated Wood (TWW) Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D Trellis and Sun Shades ExteriorSeparate Pressure Treated wood from non-
pressure treated32,359
Thermostats Mercury Bldg D Interior Contractor to field locate for removal 4
Digital/Electronic Smoke Detector/Fire Alarms Heavy Metals/Electronic Components Bldg D Interior of buildingSee Appendix C for Bldg D Fire Alarm
DrawingContractor to verify
HVAC System - Compressor/Refrigerant Reservoir Hazardous Material - Liquid Bldg D Roof Package HVAC Units 4
3. Quantity of pressure treated wood estimated in board feet. See Table 4 for detail. Contractor to field verify.
2. HVAC unit was unable to be opened. HVAC unit contains compressor oils and/or refrigerants that require capture and/or removal by a certified refrigerant recovery technician.
Notes:
July 14, 2017
Table 3
Piedmont High School - Administration Building (Building D) Demolition
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
1. Quantity of fluorescent light tubes and ballasts estimated. Contractor to field verify prior to demolition.
ORMs and Universal Waste
T-11
Component Regulated Material Building Location TWW Board Dimensions Board Feet (per board) Condition Quantity Total Board Feet
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 4" x 16" x 28' 149 Good 29 4,331
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 4" x 16" x 13' 69 Good 18 1,248
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 4" x 16" x 25' 133 Good 12 1,600
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 4" x 16" x 8' 43 Good 47 2,005
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 3" x 10" x 20' 50 Good 57 2,850
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 3" x 10" x 15' 38 Good 77 2,888
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 3" x 10" x 10' 25 Good 16 400
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 2" x 4" x 20' 13 Good 214 2,853
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 2" x 4" x 6' 4 Good 126 504
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Trellis and Sun Shades Exterior 2" x 10" x 12' 20 Good 84 1,680
Pressure Treated Wood Pentachlorophenol (TWW) Bldg D and C Tile Roof Support Structure Exterior Miscellaneous ----- ----- ----- 12,000
32,359
Table 4
Piedmont High School - Building D and C Trellis and Sunshade Demolition
800 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA
Treated Wood Waste (TWW) Quantity Summary
July 31, 2017
Notes:
1. Quantity and estimated board feet of pressure treated wood are approximate. Contractor to field verify.
TOTAL
T-12
APPENDIX A
CERTIFIED ANALYTICAL REPORTS
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
091714698EMSL Order:
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Attention: Phone:Mark Milani (925) 330-7642
Fax:Milani & Associates
Received Date:2655 Stanwell Drive 07/17/2017 11:45 AM
Analysis Date:Suite 105 07/23/2017 - 07/24/2017
Collected Date:Concord, CA 94520
Project:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
170713-1
091714698-0001
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
25%
Cellulose
Glass
5%
10%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp. Roof Silver w
black tar and felt
paper - Roof B (Trellis
Roof) Roof NE Corner
Field
170713-2-Roofing
091714698-0002
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
30%
Glass10%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp. Roof Silver w
black tar and felt
paper - Roof B (Trellis
Roof) Roof NW
Corner Field
170713-2-Insulation
091714698-0002A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose
Min. Wool
20%
75%
Gray/Yellow
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp. Roof Silver w
black tar and felt
paper - Roof B (Trellis
Roof) Roof NW
Corner Field
170713-3-Roofing
091714698-0003
None DetectedQuartz
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%
60%
15%
Glass15%Red/Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp Roof (A) w Red
rock/black tar - Bldg D
Roof A SW Core Field
170713-3-Tar
091714698-0003A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp Roof (A) w Red
rock/black tar - Bldg D
Roof A SW Core Field
170713-3-Insulation
091714698-0003B
None DetectedCellulose
Min. Wool
25%
75%
Gray/Yellow
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp Roof (A) w Red
rock/black tar - Bldg D
Roof A SW Core Field
170713-4-Roofing
091714698-0004
None DetectedQuartz
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
12%
60%
13%
Glass15%Red/Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp Roof (A) w Red
rock/black tar - Bldg D
Roof A NE Core Field
170713-4-Tar
091714698-0004A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp Roof (A) w Red
rock/black tar - Bldg D
Roof A NE Core Field
170713-4-Insulation
091714698-0004B
None DetectedCellulose
Min. Wool
15%
85%
Gray/Yellow
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Comp Roof (A) w Red
rock/black tar - Bldg D
Roof A NE Core Field
170713-5
091714698-0005
None DetectedMatrix15%Cellulose85%Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof Tile Vapor
Barrier Black - Bldg D
Roof Tile SW Center
170713-6
091714698-0006
None DetectedMatrix20%Cellulose80%Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Roof Tile Vapor
Barrier Black - Bldg D
Roof Tile SE Center
170713-7
091714698-0007
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
30%
50%
20%
Gray/White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Flashing Mastic White
- Trellis Roof S Edge
170713-8
091714698-0008
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
25%
Cellulose15%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Penetration Mastic
Black - Trellis Roof
NE Corner
170713-9
091714698-0009
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
25%
Cellulose15%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Penetration Mastic
Black - Trellis Roof
NW Corner
Initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:33
Page 1 of 7ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 7/24/2017 9:40 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
091714698EMSL Order:
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
170713-10
091714698-0010
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
65%
35%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Flashing Mastic Grey
- Bldg D Roof NW
Corner
170713-11
091714698-0011
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Flashing Mastic Grey
- Bldg D Roof NE
Corner
170713-12
091714698-0012
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic Dark Grey
Flashing Cap on Post
- Bldg D Roof
Flashing Cap on Post
NE Cor
170713-13
091714698-0013
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic Dark Grey
Flashing Cap on Post
- Bldg D Roof
Flashing Cap on Post
NW Cor
170713-14
091714698-0014
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
65%
35%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic Dark Grey
Water Spigot Skeve -
Bldg D Roof N Center
Under The Roof
170713-15-Mortar
091714698-0015
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
35%
65%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Martar Bed Grey
Under Brown Tile -
Bldg D Mens RR H/C
Stahl NE Cor
170713-15-Tile
091714698-0015A
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
35%
65%
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Martar Bed Grey
Under Brown Tile -
Bldg D Mens RR H/C
Stahl NE Cor
170713-15-Grout
091714698-0015B
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
Brown/Purple
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Martar Bed Grey
Under Brown Tile -
Bldg D Mens RR H/C
Stahl NE Cor
170713-16-Mortar
091714698-0016
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
45%
55%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Martar Bed Grey
Under Green Tile -
Bldg D Mens RR H/C
Stahl NE Cor
170713-16-Tile
091714698-0016A
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
35%
65%
Gray/Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Martar Bed Grey
Under Green Tile -
Bldg D Mens RR H/C
Stahl NE Cor
170713-17
091714698-0017
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
Brown/Red
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Grout Brown from
Brown Tile - Bldg D
Mens RR H/C Stahl
NE Cor
170713-18
091714698-0018
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
35%
65%
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Grout Grey from
Green Tile - Bldg D
Mens RR H/C Stahl
NE Cor
170713-19
091714698-0019
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Grout Grey from
Green Tile - Bldg D
Womens RR H/C
Stahl NW Cor
170713-20
091714698-0020
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Grout Brown Off
Brown Tile - Bldg D
Womens RR NW
Corner
Initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:33
Page 2 of 7ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 7/24/2017 9:40 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
091714698EMSL Order:
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
170713-21-Mortar
091714698-0021
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
40%
60%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mortar Bed Lt Grey
Under Green Tile -
Bldg D Women RR
NW Corner
170713-21-Tile
091714698-0021A
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
35%
65%
Brown/Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mortar Bed Lt Grey
Under Green Tile -
Bldg D Women RR
NW Corner
170713-22-Mortar
091714698-0022
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
45%
55%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mortar Bed Lt Grey
Under Brown Tile -
Bldg D Women RR
NW Corner
170713-22-Tile
091714698-0022A
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
30%
70%
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mortar Bed Lt Grey
Under Brown Tile -
Bldg D Women RR
NW Corner
170713-23-Carpet
091714698-0023
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)10%Synthetic90%Gray
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Grey Carpet W/Yellow
Mastic - Bldg D Nebs
RR/NE Cor @ Dor
170713-23-Mastic
091714698-0023A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Grey Carpet W/Yellow
Mastic - Bldg D Nebs
RR/NE Cor @ Dor
170713-24-Cove Base
091714698-0024
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
40%
10%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 6"
w/White yellow mastic
- Bldg D Waiting
Room of Faculty RR
Center N Wall
170713-24-Mastic
091714698-0024A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
50%
White/Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 6"
w/White yellow mastic
- Bldg D Waiting
Room of Faculty RR
Center N Wall
170713-25-Carpet
091714698-0025
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Synthetic95%Brown/Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Brown w/black
spots and yellow
mastic - Bldg D Office
#4 NE Cor
170713-25-Mastic
091714698-0025A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Brown w/black
spots and yellow
mastic - Bldg D Office
#4 NE Cor
170713-26-Cove Base
091714698-0026
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
35%
15%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Tan
w/white mastic - Bldg
D Office #1 NE Cor
170713-26-Mastic
091714698-0026A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
50%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Tan
w/white mastic - Bldg
D Office #1 NE Cor
170713-26-Compound
091714698-0026B
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Tan
w/white mastic - Bldg
D Office #1 NE Cor
170713-27-Drywall
091714698-0027
None DetectedGypsum
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
28%
Cellulose2%White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS Tan Corner -
Bldg D Office #1 NE
Corner
170713-27-Joint
Compound
091714698-0027A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
20%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS Tan Corner -
Bldg D Office #1 NE
Corner
170713-28-Drywall
091714698-0028
None DetectedGypsum
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
28%
Cellulose
Glass
2%
<1%
White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS Tan Field - Bldg
D Office N Wall
Initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:33
Page 3 of 7ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 7/24/2017 9:40 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
091714698EMSL Order:
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
170713-28-Joint
Compound
091714698-0028A
Not SubmittedDWS Tan Field - Bldg
D Office N Wall
No Joint Compound present in sample
170713-29-Cove Base
091714698-0029
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
35%
15%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Tan
w/white mastic - Bldg
D Office #6 NE
Corner
170713-29-Mastic
091714698-0029A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
50%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Tan
w/white mastic - Bldg
D Office #6 NE
Corner
170713-29-Compound
091714698-0029B
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Tan
w/white mastic - Bldg
D Office #6 NE
Corner
170713-30-Carpet
091714698-0030
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Synthetic95%Brown/Black
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Brown w/black
spots with yellow
mastic - Bldg D Office
#1 NW Corner
170713-30-Mastic
091714698-0030A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
40%
Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Brown w/black
spots with yellow
mastic - Bldg D Office
#1 NW Corner
170713-31
091714698-0031
None DetectedPerlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%
30%
Cellulose
Min. Wool
40%
20%
Tan
Fibrous
Homogeneous
LCT White w/random
hooks and channels -
Bldg D Office #1
Ceiling W Center
170713-32
091714698-0032
None DetectedPerlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%
30%
Cellulose
Min. Wool
40%
20%
Tan
Fibrous
Homogeneous
LCT White w/random
hooks and channels -
A+D Bldg Office #4
Ceiling SW Corner
170713-33
091714698-0033
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
30%
50%
20%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Column Texture White
Pebble Texture - Bldg
D Office #4 NE
Corner
170713-34
091714698-0034
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
30%
50%
20%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Column Texture White
Pebble Texture - Bldg
D Office #15 SE
Corner
170713-35-RFT
091714698-0035
<1% ChrysotileCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
50%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Grey Brown
Striatius Black Mastic
- Bldg D Janitors
Closet SE Corner
170713-35-Mastic
091714698-0035A
5% ChrysotileMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
45%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Grey Brown
Striatius Black Mastic
- Bldg D Janitors
Closet SE Corner
170713-36-RFT
091714698-0036
<1% ChrysotileCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
50%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Grey Brown
Striatius Black Mastic
- Bldg D Janitors
Closet SW Corner
170713-36-Mastic
091714698-0036A
Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)RFT Grey Brown
Striatius Black Mastic
- Bldg D Janitors
Closet SW Corner
Initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:33
Page 4 of 7ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 7/24/2017 9:40 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
091714698EMSL Order:
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
170713-37-RFT
091714698-0037
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
45%
55%
Brown/Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Gray Brown with
White+Brown
stratious/yellow
mastic - Bldg D North
Storage SW Corner
170713-37-Mastic
091714698-0037A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
65%
35%
Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Gray Brown with
White+Brown
stratious/yellow
mastic - Bldg D North
Storage SW Corner
170713-38
091714698-0038
3% ChrysotileMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
37%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Sink Sounds Proofing
Black - Bldg D
Workroom S Wall
Center
170713-39-Carpet
091714698-0039
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Synthetic95%Gray/Blue
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Tile blue grey
yellow mastic - Vldg D
S Floor Work Room
@ Door
170713-39-Mastic
091714698-0039A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
40%
Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Tile blue grey
yellow mastic - Vldg D
S Floor Work Room
@ Door
170713-40-Drywall
091714698-0040
None DetectedGypsum
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
17%
Cellulose3%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS Yellow White -
Bldg D Work Room E
Wall S Corner
170713-40-Joint
Compound
091714698-0040A
<1% ChrysotileCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
20%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS Yellow White -
Bldg D Work Room E
Wall S Corner
170713-41-Cove Base
091714698-0041
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
30%
20%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 6"
w/yellow mastic - Bldg
D Work Room E Wall
S Corner
170713-41-Mastic
091714698-0041A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
60%
20%
Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 6"
w/yellow mastic - Bldg
D Work Room E Wall
S Corner
170713-41-Compound
091714698-0041B
<1% ChrysotileCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 6"
w/yellow mastic - Bldg
D Work Room E Wall
S Corner
170713-42-Carpet
091714698-0042
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)10%Synthetic90%Gray
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Blue Grey
W/yellow mastic -
Bldg D Admin
Reception NE Corner
170713-42-Mastic
091714698-0042A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
20%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Blue Grey
W/yellow mastic -
Bldg D Admin
Reception NE Corner
170713-43-Drywall
091714698-0043
None DetectedGypsum
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
18%
Cellulose
Glass
2%
<1%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS White - Bldg D
Admin Receoption NE
Corner
170713-43-Joint
Compound
091714698-0043A
2% ChrysotileCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
18%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS White - Bldg D
Admin Receoption NE
Corner
Initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:33
Page 5 of 7ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 7/24/2017 9:40 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
091714698EMSL Order:
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
170713-44-Cove Base
091714698-0044
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
30%
20%
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Grey
Brown w/yellow
mastic - Bldg D Rm
16 NE Corner
170713-44-Mastic
091714698-0044A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
60%
20%
Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Grey
Brown w/yellow
mastic - Bldg D Rm
16 NE Corner
170713-44-Compound
091714698-0044B
2% ChrysotileCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
28%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Grey
Brown w/yellow
mastic - Bldg D Rm
16 NE Corner
170713-45-Carpet
091714698-0045
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Synthetic80%Gray/Blue
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Blue yellow
white pebble pattern -
Bldg D Rn 16 NE
Corner
170713-45-Mastic
091714698-0045A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
20%
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Carpet Blue yellow
white pebble pattern -
Bldg D Rn 16 NE
Corner
170713-46
091714698-0046
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
60%
20%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Column Texture White
- Bldg D Rm 16 NE
Corner
170713-47-Cove Base
091714698-0047
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
30%
20%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase black 6"
yellow mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway SW Corner
170713-47-Mastic
091714698-0047A
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
60%
20%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase black 6"
yellow mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway SW Corner
170713-47-Compound
091714698-0047B
<1% ChrysotileCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase black 6"
yellow mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway SW Corner
170713-48-Floor Tile
091714698-0048
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Lt+Grey w dark
gray lineations/yellow
brown mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway W Wall
Center
170713-48-Mastic
091714698-0048A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
20%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Lt+Grey w dark
gray lineations/yellow
brown mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway W Wall
Center
170713-49-Floor Tile
091714698-0049
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
30%
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Lt+Grey w dark
gray lineations/yellow
brown mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway S Wall
Center
170713-49-Mastic
091714698-0049A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
20%
Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
RFT Lt+Grey w dark
gray lineations/yellow
brown mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway S Wall
Center
170713-50-Cove Base
091714698-0050
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
50%
30%
20%
Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 4"
Yellow Masitc - Bldg
D E Hallway N Wall
Center Locker
Initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:33
Page 6 of 7ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 7/24/2017 9:40 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
091714698EMSL Order:
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
170713-50-Mastic
091714698-0050A
None DetectedMatrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
80%
20%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 4"
Yellow Masitc - Bldg
D E Hallway N Wall
Center Locker
170713-51
091714698-0051
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
60%
20%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Ext Column Stucco
White - Bldg D SW
Corner Column
170713-52
091714698-0052
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%
70%
20%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Sealant Gray - Bldg D
Sidewalk Exp Joint
SW Corner
170713-53
091714698-0053
None DetectedCa Carbonate
Matrix
Non-fibrous (Other)
5%
80%
15%
Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Door Caulking Grey -
Bldg D Exterior W
Hallway Door/W Side
Low
170713-54
091714698-0054
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
60%
20%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Stucco White Upper
Exterior - Bldg D
Exterior Wall EASt N
Center @ Column 3
170713-55
091714698-0055
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
60%
20%
Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Spray Coating White
on Concrete Lower -
Bldg D Exterior Wall
EASt N Center @
Column 3
Analyst(s)
Beheshta Ahadi (57)
Shane Heisser (33)
Matthew Batongbacal
or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no
responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim
product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government . Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL
recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless
requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc San Leandro, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101048-3, WA C884
Initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:33
Page 7 of 7ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 7/24/2017 9:40 AM
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Phone/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
EMSL Order: 091714698
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Attention: Mark Milani Phone: (925) 330-7642
Milani & Associates Fax:
2655 Stanwell Drive Received: 07/17/2017 11:45 AM
Suite 105 Analysis Date: 07/23/2017 - 07/24/2017
Concord, CA 94520 Collected:
Project:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy. Quantitation using 400 Point Count Procedure
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS Yellow White -
Bldg D Work Room E
Wall S Corner
170713-40-Joint
Compound
091714698-0040A
Non-fibrous (Other)99.75% 0.25%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 6"
w/yellow mastic - Bldg
D Work Room E Wall S
Corner
170713-41-Compou
nd
091714698-0041B
Non-fibrous (Other)99.50% 0.50%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase black 6"
yellow mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway SW Corner
170713-47-Compou
nd
091714698-0047B
Non-fibrous (Other)99.75% 0.25%Chrysotile
Analyst(s)
Shane Heisser (3) Matthew Batongbacal
or other approved signatory
Disclaimer:Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.25%. EMSL Analytical Inc suggests
that samples reported as <0.25% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM . The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full,
without written approval of EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government . EMSL
Analytical Inc., bears no responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical
Inc., liability is limited to the cost of sample analysis.The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition
unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc San Leandro, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101048-3, WA C884
Initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:28
ASB_PLMPC_0006_0003 Printed 7/24/2017 9:40:49AM Page 1 of 1
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Phone/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
EMSL Order: 091714698
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048
Project ID:
Attention: Mark Milani Phone: (925) 330-7642
Milani & Associates Fax:
2655 Stanwell Drive Received: 07/17/2017 11:45 AM
Suite 105 Analysis Date: 07/23/2017 - 07/26/2017
Concord, CA 94520 Collected:
Project: 1048 - PHS Admin Bldg Demo
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using
Polarized Light Microscopy. Quantitation using 400 Point Count Procedure
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS Yellow White -
Bldg D Work Room E
Wall S Corner
170713-40-Joint
Compound
091714698-0040A
Non-fibrous (Other)99.75% 0.25%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Black 6"
w/yellow mastic - Bldg
D Work Room E Wall S
Corner
170713-41-Compou
nd
091714698-0041B
Non-fibrous (Other)99.50% 0.50%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
DWS White - Bldg D
Admin Receoption NE
Corner
170713-43-Joint
Compound
091714698-0043A
Non-fibrous (Other)100% <0.25%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase Grey Brown
w/yellow mastic - Bldg
D Rm 16 NE Corner
170713-44-Compou
nd
091714698-0044B
Non-fibrous (Other)100% <0.25%Chrysotile
White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Covebase black 6"
yellow mastic - Bldg D
E Hallway SW Corner
170713-47-Compou
nd
091714698-0047B
Non-fibrous (Other)99.75% 0.25%Chrysotile
Analyst(s)
Adam C. Fink (2)
Shane Heisser (3)
Matthew Batongbacal
or other approved signatory
Disclaimer:Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.25%. EMSL Analytical Inc suggests
that samples reported as <0.25% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM . The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full,
without written approval of EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government . EMSL
Analytical Inc., bears no responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical
Inc., liability is limited to the cost of sample analysis.The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition
unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc San Leandro, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101048-3, WA C884
Report amended: 07/24/2017 11:24:23 Replaces initial report from: 07/24/2017 09:40:51 Reason Code: Client-Change to Project
ASB_PLMPC_0006_0003 Printed 7/26/2017 11:21:38PM Page 1 of 1
OrderID: 091714698
Page 1 Of 6
OrderID: 091714698
Page 2 Of 6
OrderID: 091714698
Page 3 Of 6
OrderID: 091714698
Page 4 Of 6
OrderID: 091714698
Page 5 Of 6
OrderID: 091714698
Page 6 Of 6
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick Street San Leandro, CA 94577
Tel/Fax: (510) 895-3675 / (510) 895-3680
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
091810382EMSL Order:
Customer ID: MLAN42
Customer PO: 1048-2018-1
Project ID:
Attention: Phone:Mark Milani (925) 330-7642
Fax:Milani & Associates
Received Date:2655 Stanwell Drive 05/16/2018 12:00 PM
Analysis Date:Suite 105 05/16/2018
Collected Date:Concord, CA 94520 05/10/2018
Project: 1048 / PHS Bldg D
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
180510-101
091810382-0001
None DetectedQuartz
Ca Carbonate
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
50%
30%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Concrete, Gray - SW
Exterior Door
Analyst(s)
Beheshta Ahadi (1) Matthew Batongbacal
or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no
responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim
product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government . Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL
recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless
requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc San Leandro, CA NVLAP Lab Code 101048-3, WA C884
Initial report from: 05/16/2018 20:33:27
Page 1 of 1ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 5/16/2018 5:33 PM
OrderID: 091810382
Page 1 Of 2
OrderID: 091810382
Page 2 Of 2
WorkOrder:
Report Created for: Milani & Associates
2520 Stanwell Drive Ste 250
Concord, CA 94520
Project Contact: Mark Milani
Project Name: 1048; Admin (Bldg D) Building Demo Survey
Project P.O.: 1048
Project Received: 07/17/2017
Analytical Report reviewed & approved for release on 07/21/2017 by:
Angela Rydelius,
Laboratory Manager
1707530
The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written
approval of the laboratory. The analytical results relate only to the
items tested. Results reported conform to the most current NELAP
standards, where applicable, unless otherwise stated in the case
narrative.
Analytical Report
1534 Willow Pass Rd. Pittsburg, CA 94565 ♦ TEL: (877) 252-9262 ♦ FAX: (925) 252-9269 ♦ www.mccampbell.com
CA ELAP 1644 ♦ NELAP 4033ORELAP
McCampbell Analytical, Inc."When Quality Counts"
Page 1 of 8
Glossary of Terms & Qualifier Definitions
Client: Milani & Associates
Project: 1048; Admin (Bldg D) Building Demo Survey
WorkOrder: 1707530
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701
Toll Free Telephone: (877) 252-9262 / Fax: (925) 252-9269
http://www.mccampbell.com / E-mail: [email protected]"When Quality Counts"
Glossary Abbreviation
%D Serial Dilution Percent Difference
95% Interval 95% Confident Interval
DF Dilution Factor
DI WET (DISTLC) Waste Extraction Test using DI water
DISS Dissolved (direct analysis of 0.45 µm filtered and acidified water sample)
DLT Dilution Test (Serial Dilution)
DUP Duplicate
EDL Estimated Detection Limit
ERS External reference sample. Second source calibration verification.
ITEF International Toxicity Equivalence Factor
LCS Laboratory Control Sample
MB Method Blank
MB % Rec % Recovery of Surrogate in Method Blank, if applicable
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level of Quantitation
MS Matrix Spike
MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate
N/A Not Applicable
ND Not detected at or above the indicated MDL or RL
NR Data Not Reported due to matrix interference or insufficient sample amount.
PDS Post Digestion Spike
PDSD Post Digestion Spike Duplicate
PF Prep Factor
RD Relative Difference
RL Reporting Limit (The RL is the lowest calibration standard in a multipoint calibration.)
RPD Relative Percent Deviation
RRT Relative Retention Time
SPK Val Spike Value
SPKRef Val Spike Reference Value
SPLP Synthetic Precipitation Leachate Procedure
ST Sorbent Tube
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure
TEQ Toxicity Equivalents
WET (STLC) Waste Extraction Test (Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration)
Page 2 of 8
Analytical Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701
Toll Free Telephone: (877) 252-9262 / Fax: (925) 252-9269
http://www.mccampbell.com / E-mail: [email protected]"When Quality Counts"
Client: Milani & Associates
Project: 1048; Admin (Bldg D) Building Demo Survey
Date Received: 7/17/17 12:30
Date Prepared: 7/17/17
WorkOrder: 1707530
Extraction Method: SW3050B
Analytical Method: SW6020
Unit: mg/Kg
Lead
170713-101L/Ceramic Floor Tile, Brown, Mens 1707530-001A Solid 07/13/2017 ICP-MS3 142086
Analytes Result DF Date AnalyzedRL
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID
Lead 7.3 0.50 1 07/17/2017 23:57
Surrogates REC (%) Limits
Analyst(s): ND
Terbium 106 70-130 07/17/2017 23:57
170713-102L/ Ceramic Floor Tile, Brown, Women 1707530-002A Solid 07/13/2017 ICP-MS3 142086
Analytes Result DF Date AnalyzedRL
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID
Lead 0.55 0.50 1 07/18/2017 00:03
Surrogates REC (%) Limits
Analyst(s): ND
Terbium 104 70-130 07/18/2017 00:03
170713-103L/ Ceramic Wall Tile, Green Mens RR 1707530-003A Solid 07/13/2017 ICP-MS3 142086
Analytes Result DF Date AnalyzedRL
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID
Lead 0.58 0.50 1 07/18/2017 00:09
Surrogates REC (%) Limits
Analyst(s): ND
Terbium 110 70-130 07/18/2017 00:09
170713-104L/Ceramic Wall Tile, Green Womens 1707530-004A Solid 07/13/2017 ICP-MS3 142086
Analytes Result DF Date AnalyzedRL
Client ID Lab ID Matrix Date Collected Instrument Batch ID
Lead ND 0.50 1 07/18/2017 00:15
Surrogates REC (%) Limits
Analyst(s): ND
Terbium 100 70-130 07/18/2017 00:15
Angela Rydelius, Lab ManagerCDPH ELAP 1644 • NELAP 4033ORELAP
Page 3 of 8
Quality Control Report
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701
Toll Free Telephone: (877) 252-9262 / Fax: (925) 252-9269
http://www.mccampbell.com / E-mail: [email protected]"When Quality Counts"
Client: Milani & Associates
Project: 1048; Admin (Bldg D) Building Demo Survey
Date Analyzed: 7/18/17
Date Prepared: 7/17/17
WorkOrder: 1707530
BatchID: 142086
Analytical Method: SW6020
Unit: mg/Kg
Sample ID: MB/LCS-142086
1707520-001AMS/MSD
Instrument: ICP-MS2
Matrix: Soil
Extraction Method: SW3050B
QC Summary Report for Metals
Analyte MB
Result
LCS
Result
RL SPK
Val
MB SS
%REC
LCS
%REC
LCS
Limits
Lead ND 50.6 0.50 50 - 101 75-125
Surrogate Recovery
Terbium 532.7 496 500 107 99 70-130
Analyte MS
Result
MSD
Result
SPK
Val
SPKRef
Val
MS
%REC
MSD
%REC
MS/MSD
Limits
RPD RPD
Limit
Lead 50.0 53.6 50 2.783 94 102 75-125 6.99 20
Surrogate Recovery
Terbium 472 504 500 94 101 70-130 6.58 20
Analyte DLT
Result
DLTRef
Val
%D %D
Limit
Lead 2.94 2.783 5.64 -
%D Control Limit applied to analytes with concentrations greater than 25 times the reporting limits.
QA/QC OfficerCDPH ELAP 1644 • NELAP 4033ORELAP
Page 4 of 8
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.1534 Willow Pass Rd
Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701
(925) 252-9262
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Page
Lab ID Matrix Collection Date Hold
Requested Tests (See legend below)
Report to:
Mark Milani
2520 Stanwell Drive Ste 250
Concord, CA 94520
(925) 674-9082 FAX:
PO: 1048
07/17/2017
Client ID
ProjectNo: 1048; Admin (Bldg D) Building Demo Survey
WorkOrder: 1707530
1 of 1
Date Logged:
Date Received: 07/17/2017
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Milani & Associates
Bill to:
Mark Milani
Milani & Associates
2520 Stanwell Drive Ste 250
Concord, CA 94520
Requested TAT: 5 days;
ClientCode: MACC
Email: [email protected]
EDF EQuIS Email HardCopy ThirdParty
Excel J-flagWriteOn
cc/3rd Party:
WaterTrax
A1707530-001 Solid 7/13/2017 00:00170713-101L/Ceramic Floor Tile, Brown,
A1707530-002 Solid 7/13/2017 00:00170713-102L/ Ceramic Floor Tile, Brown,
A1707530-003 Solid 7/13/2017 00:00170713-103L/ Ceramic Wall Tile, Green
A1707530-004 Solid 7/13/2017 00:00170713-104L/Ceramic Wall Tile, Green
Prepared by: Jena Alfaro
NOTE: Soil samples are discarded 60 days after results are reported unless other arrangements are made (Water samples are 30 days). Hazardous samples will be returned to client or disposed of at client expense.
Comments:
PBMS_TTLC_S1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10
Test Legend:
11 12
Page 5 of 8
Lab ID Client ID Collection Date
& Time
Date Logged:
TATMatrix Test Name Containers
/Composites
WORK ORDER SUMMARY
Work Order: 1707530
Comments:
Client Name: MILANI & ASSOCIATES Project: 1048; Admin (Bldg D) Building Demo Survey
QC Level: LEVEL 2
HoldDe-
chlorinated
SubOutBottle & Preservative
7/17/2017
Sediment
Content
EDF Fax Email HardCopy ThirdPartyExcel J-flagWriteOn
Mark MilaniClient Contact:
[email protected]'s Email:
WaterTrax
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701
Toll Free Telephone: (877) 252-9262 / Fax: (925) 252-9269
http://www.mccampbell.com / E-mail: [email protected]"When Quality Counts"
1707530-001A 170713-101L/Ceramic Floor
Tile, Brown, Mens
7/13/2017 5 daysSolid SW6020 (Lead) 1 Plastic Baggie, Small
1707530-002A 170713-102L/ Ceramic Floor
Tile, Brown, Womens RR
7/13/2017 5 daysSolid SW6020 (Lead) 1 Plastic Baggie, Small
1707530-003A 170713-103L/ Ceramic Wall
Tile, Green Mens RR
7/13/2017 5 daysSolid SW6020 (Lead) 1 Plastic Baggie, Small
1707530-004A 170713-104L/Ceramic Wall
Tile, Green Womens RR
7/13/2017 5 daysSolid SW6020 (Lead) 1 Plastic Baggie, Small
1 of 1Page
- STLC and TCLP extractions require 2 days to complete; therefore, all TATs begin after the extraction is completed (i.e., One-day TAT yields results
in 3 days from sample submission).
NOTES:
- MAI assumes that all material present in the provided sampling container is considered part of the sample - MAI does not exclude any material from
the sample prior to sample preparation unless requested in writing by the client.
Page 6 of 8
Page 7 of 8
Sample Receipt Checklist
McCampbell Analytical, Inc.1534 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565-1701
Toll Free Telephone: (877) 252-9262 / Fax: (925) 252-9269
http://www.mccampbell.com / E-mail: [email protected]"When Quality Counts"
Client Name: Milani & Associates
WorkOrder №: 1707530
Date Logged: 7/17/2017
Logged by: Jena AlfaroMatrix: Solid
Carrier: Client Drop-In
Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No NA
Samples Received on Ice? Yes No
Chain of custody present? Yes No
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No
Samples in proper containers/bottles? Yes No
Sample containers intact? Yes No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No
NAAll samples received within holding time? Yes No
NASample/Temp Blank temperature
Yes No NAWater - VOA vials have zero headspace / no bubbles?
pH acceptable upon receipt (Metal: <2; 522: <4; 218.7: >8)? Yes No NA
Temp:
Chain of Custody (COC) Information
Yes NoSample IDs noted by Client on COC?
Yes NoDate and Time of collection noted by Client on COC?
Yes NoSampler's name noted on COC?
Sample Receipt Information
Sample Preservation and Hold Time (HT) Information
Sample labels checked for correct preservation? Yes No
Project Name: 1048; Admin (Bldg D) Building Demo Survey
Comments:
Total Chlorine tested and acceptable upon receipt for EPA 522? Yes No NA
UCMR Samples:
Free Chlorine tested and acceptable upon receipt for EPA 218.7, 300.1, 537, 539?
Yes No NA
Date and Time Received 7/17/2017 12:30
Received by: Jena Alfaro
Page 8 of 8
United States Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology
Certificate of Accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2005
NVLAP LAB CODE: 101048-3
EMSL Analytical, Inc.San Leandro, CA
is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for specific services, listed on the Scope of Accreditation, for:
Asbestos Fiber Analysis
2016-07-01 through 2017-06-30Effective Dates For the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
This laboratory is accredited in accordance with the recognized International Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005. This accreditation demonstrates technical competence for a defined scope and the operation of a laboratory quality
management system (refer to joint ISO-ILAC-IAF Communique dated January 2009).
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005
Page 1 of 1
For the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
Effective 2016-07-01 through 2017-06-30
EMSL Analytical, Inc.464 McCormick St.
San Leandro, CA 94577Mr. Chris Dojlidko
Phone: 510-895-3675 Fax: (510) 895-3680Email: [email protected]
http://www.emsl.com
ASBESTOS FIBER ANALYSIS NVLAP LAB CODE 101048-3
Bulk Asbestos Analysis
Code Description18/A01 EPA 600/M4-82-020: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples
18/A03 EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials
Airborne Asbestos Analysis
Code Description18/A02 U.S. EPA's "Interim Transmission Electron Microscopy Analytical Methods-Mandatory and
Nonmandatory-and Mandatory Section to Determine Completion of Response Actions" as found in 40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix A.
APPENDIX B
LEAD XRF SURVEY REPORT
APPENDIX C
FIRE ALARM DRAWINGS
Quad / Student CenterSeismic / Modernization
Project
Piedmont High School800 Magnolia AvenuePiedmont, California
Piedmont Unified School District
DSA BACKCHECK08/19/2009
P:\2008\08017-Piedmont HS and MS\8017-FA-0.dwg, 8/7/2009 1:23:24 PM, DWG To PDF2.pc3
Quad / Student CenterSeismic / Modernization
Project
Piedmont High School800 Magnolia AvenuePiedmont, California
Piedmont Unified School District
DSA BACKCHECK08/19/2009
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ADMINISTRATION & CLASSROOMS FLOOR PLAN
P:\2008\08017-Piedmont HS and MS\8017-FA-6.dwg, 8/7/2009 1:25:24 PM, DWG To PDF2.pc3
SCALE: NO SCALE
FIRE ALARM RISER DIAGRAM BUILDING 10 (SLC #1, NAC #1)
SCALE: NO SCALE
FIRE ALARM RISER DIAGRAM BUILDING 20 (SLC #1, NAC #1)
SHEET NOTES:
NOTE:
Quad / Student CenterSeismic / Modernization
Project
Piedmont High School800 Magnolia AvenuePiedmont, California
Piedmont Unified School District
DSA BACKCHECK08/19/2009
P:\2008\08017-Piedmont HS and MS\8017-FA-14.dwg, 8/7/2009 1:27:24 PM, DWG To PDF2.pc3
APPENDIX D
PHOTO LOG
Photo Log Job No. 1048
Photo Log Page - 1
Photo #1 Adminstration Building Entrance
View looking north Note white pebble texture coat on wall.
Photo Log Job No. 1048
Photo Log Page - 2
Photo #2
Adminstration Building Entrance View looking north
Note white pebble texture coat on column.
Photo Log Job No. 1048
Photo Log Page - 3
Photo #3 Adminstration Building Roof
View looking south west TWW Portico visible
Photo Log Job No. 1048
Photo Log Page - 4
Photo #4 Adminstration Building Roof
View looking north east TWW Sunshade visible
Photo Log Job No. 1048
Photo Log Page - 5
Photo #5
Adminstration Building Roof View looking north west
HVAC unit and TWW equipment surroung visible
Photo Log Job No. 1048
Photo Log Page - 6
Photo #6
Adminstration Building Interior Work Room
Interior View of Work Room with Sink with ACM soundproof coating
Photo Log Job No. 1048
Photo Log Page - 7
Photo #7
Adminstration Building Interior Interior Column
Note: white pebble texture coat.
APPENDIX E
REGULATORY INFORMATION/NOTIFICATION FORMS
DEMOLITION REGULATION 11, Rule 2
Notification Form
Site of Demolition
For Office Use Only J# I#
Site Address: Cross Street: City: Zip: Owner/Operator Phone ( ) Specific Location of Project within Building/Address: Check One: Single Family Dwelling Commercial Multifamily Dwelling Govt Bldg School
Contractor/Individual Performing Demolition
Name: Company/Individual Contact: Mailing Address: City: Zip: Phone: ( )
Have you previously submitted notifications for other sites? Yes No
Description of Demolition
Is this Demolition by Fire for Fire Training purposes? yes No
Is this Demolition ordered by a Government Agency? yes No (Emergency only – attach copy of order) If not Demolition for Fire Training, check applicable method: Heavy Equipment Implosion By Hand Other Dates of Demolition: (Actual dates must be entered, "ASAP" or "SOON" will be rejected.) Start: Completion: Weekend Work? Night Work (After 5 PM)?
Asbestos Survey Report
Name of company that conducted survey: Address:
City: Zip: Phone: ( ) Name of person who completed the survey: CAC/SST #: Is /was asbestos present? Yes No If yes, who will remove/has removed prior to demo?
Form Preparation Information
This form prepared by: Title: Name: Company/Individual Phone: ( ) Address: City: State: Zip:
See Page Two to Complete This Form www.baaqmd.gov
Required Information
Payment must be received before J# will be assigned. See Schedule L of Regulation 3 for appropriate fees. Payment type: Check Cashier’s Check Money Order Credit/ Debit Card* (American Express, Discover, Visa, MasterCard or Debit Card) (payments, other than credit card payment, must be mailed or delivered to: 939 Ellis St., San Francisco, CA 94109)
I certify that the above information is correct and that I will comply with all of the requirements of the BAAQMD's regulations, as well as all other applicable federal, state and local requirements. Signature of Contractor or Person Performing Demolition:
Form: 1102_demolition_061615 GENERAL INFORMATION ♦ This notification form shall be used to notify the BAAQMD of a demolition operation only. Notification is
required for every demolition. All boxes must be completed. Notifications may be faxed to (415) 749-4658. *To make credit or debit card payment, go to www.baaqmd.gov/payments to pay on-line. Credit card forms will no longer be accepted. Job numbers will not be issued until applicable fees are received.
♦ Notification shall be provided to the District at least 10 working days prior to commencement of demolition, or as early as possible prior to commencement of emergency demolition. The notification period will not start until a complete notification is submitted (see above).
♦ An Acknowledgement Letter is mailed to the contractor/person listed within 3-5 days of receipt of a complete notification. This should be checked for accuracy of data.
♦ If the job is postponed or cancelled, the District must be notified of a revision; the Acknowledgement Letter should be used to fax or mail the revision information. When cancelled, a cancellation fee will apply.
♦ For specifically-defined "Emergency" conditions, the 10 working day period will be waived. Notification must be made by fax, and the job number will be issued if accompanied with a faxed copy of a valid check, cashier’s check or money order.
♦ For 4 or fewer unit residences, the 10 working day period may be reduced to 72 hours for an additional fee. INSTRUCTIONS ♦ SPECIFIC LOCATION OF PROJECT: Identify where the demolition is taking place if the site contains more
than one building. ♦ START AND COMPLETION DATES: The start date is the date on which demolition of the facility or
structure commences. Any revision to the start or completion dates must be submitted prior to the previously notified date(s). Under no circumstances may the revised start date be earlier than the 10th working day following the postmark or fax date of the original notification. If the start date is unknown, enter an estimated start date and revise the notification when the actual start date is known, but not later than the estimated start date.
♦ FIRE TRAINING: Reg. 11-2-206 includes "intentional burning" in the definition of demolition. Notification is required, the 10 working day requirement must be met and all Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) >1% must be removed prior to fire training. The District's Open Burning Notification form must also be filed and the applicable requirements of Regulation 5 must be met.
♦ SURVEY REPORT: Provide information showing that prior to commencement of the demolition, a survey was performed to determine the presence of Regulated ACM (RACM). Indicate if there was/was not suspected ACM.
♦ GOVERNMENT ORDERED DEMOLITION: If an "Emergency" demolition (see above) is the result of a state or local agency declaring the building a public nuisance or structurally unsound and in danger of imminent collapse, a copy of the written order must accompany this notification.
939 Ellis Street San Francisco, California 94109 (415) 749-4762
FEES APPLICABLE TO DEMOLITION OPERATIONS (FROM REGULATION 3, SCHEDULE L) Demolition conducted at a single family dwelling is subject to the following fee:
OPERATION FEE: $88 Cancellation: $88 (100% of fee) non-refundable, for notification processing.
Demolition conducted at a single family dwelling or multiple family dwelling with four or fewer units with 72 hours instead of 10 days prior notice (excluding emergencies) is allowed upon payment of the following additional fee:
OPERATION FEE: $606 Demolition, other than those conducted at a single family dwelling, is subject to the following fee:
OPERATION FEE: $364 Cancellation: $243 of above amount non-refundable for notification processing.
Demolition conducted for the purpose of fire training is exempt from fee. SURVEY REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION OPERATION (FROM REGULATION 11, RULE 2) 303.8 Surveys: Except for ordered demolitions, prior to commencement of any demolition or renovation, the owner or operator shall thoroughly survey the affected structure or portion thereof for the presence of asbestos-containing material, including Category I and Category II nonfriable asbestos-containing material. The survey shall be performed by a person who is certified by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health, and who has taken and passed an EPA-approved Building Inspector course and who conforms to the procedures outlined in the course. The survey shall include sampling and the results of laboratory analysis of the asbestos content of all suspected asbestos-containing materials. This survey shall be made available, upon request by the APCO, prior to the commencement of any RACM removal or any demolition. This subsection shall not apply if the owner or operator asserts that the material to be renovated is RACM and will be handled in accordance with the provisions of Sections 11-2-303, 304 and 401. The requirement for certification by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health shall not apply to in-house health professionals within a specific nonasbestos related company who perform occasional surveys only for that company as part of their regular job responsibilities 8.1 When a structure, or portion thereof, is demolished under an ordered demolition, the survey must be done prior to, during, or after the demolition but prior to loading or removal of any demolition debris. If the debris contains regulated asbestos-containing material, all of the debris shall be treated as asbestos-containing waste material pursuant to Section 11-2-304. 8.2 For renovation or demolition of residential buildings having four or fewer dwelling units, a survey is not required. A sample and test of the material will be required only when any of the following will be removed or disturbed: heating, ventilation, air conditioning ducting and systems; acoustic ceiling material or acoustic plaster; textured or skim coated wall surfaces, cement siding or stucco, or resilient flooring. Where the material is found to contain greater than 1 percent asbestos and is friable, the material must be handled in accordance with Section 11-2-303. 6/2015
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
CAL/OSHA Form 183B Rev 04/2004
Temporary Worksite Notification for Asbestos-Related Work
Company/Employer Name: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________
Headquarters Address: _________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Contractors State License Board License Number: ______________________________
DOSH-ACRU (Cal/OSHA) Asbestos Registration Number: ______________________
And/or “Report of Use” Registry number: _________________________
Address of Temporary Worksite and Precise Location: ___________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Nearest intersection: ______________________________________________________
Type of Business: _________________________________________________________
*Name of Certified Supervisor: ______________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
*Name of Qualified person in charge of air
monitoring,
laboratory work, and respirators: _____________________________________________
*Name of Certified of Consultant: ____________________________________________
Projected job starting date: _____________projected completion date: _______________
Describe type, scope and work practices of job: _________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Evaluation of potential for exposure: __________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Estimated number of employees on this job: ____________________________________
Prior to the start of each job or phase of asbestos-related work requiring the
employer or contractor to be registered, Section 341.9 of the California Code of
Regulations (8 CCR 341.9) requires notifications to the nearest DOSH District
Office. Do not send this notification to DOSH Headquarters or to DOSH Consultation.
This will not satisfy the notification requirement and could result in citation.
Note: Any change in the information provided to the district office by the written notice
shall be reported to the district office within 24 hours of such change.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEAD-WORK PRE-JOB NOTIFICATIONDivision of Occupational Safety and Health
*Name of employer doing 'Lead Work' *Address *Zipcode *Phone
Pager/cellular phone no.Calif. Cont. Lic. No. (if applicable)
* Supervisor name:
California Department of Health Services Lead Cert. No.
*Job start date/time *Job completion date/time Shift (Check all that apply) *Approximate duration of 'Lead Work' in days
*Street address or location of job
Entity contracting the lead-work (check one) Zipcode
Pager/cellular phone no.
Type of structure and use: (Check all that apply)
Torch cutting/weldingDuration of work:
Concentration of lead in disturbed materials:
_____________________ parts per million (ppm) _____________________ % percent by weight
_____________________ mg/cm2Assumed to be lead-containing:
Name of Notifier: Title: Date:
*Precise location of work (building no., room no., etc.)
Other work practices disturbing lead:
*Describe paint removal methods (Check all that apply):
City
County
(if applicable)
Nearest cross street
Zipcode
Address
*Describe lead-related work to be done (check all that apply)
(*Note: items marked are required)
*Amount of area to be disturbed: (Check one per column)
*Number of lead-job workers: (Check one below)Supervisor:
Scope of work and work practices:
Phone
Annual Notification for Steel Structures
1 - 5
6 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
> 50
Day
Swing
Graveyard
Other
Premises Owner Lessee
Office Building
Public Access/Commercial
Residence
School
Steel Structure/Type
Other
OtherSurface Preparation
Window/Door Repair/Replacement
Water/Moisture Damage Repair
Wall Repair
Demolition
Paint Removal
Manual Scraping/Sanding
Chemical Stripping
Power Sanding/Grinding
Demolition
Abrasive Blasting
Heat Guns
Hydroblasting
Welding
Torch Cutting
< 10 square feet
10 - 100 square feet
> 1000 square feet
101 - 1000 square feet
< 10 linear feet
10 - 100 linear feet
100 - 1000 linear feet
> 1000 linear feet
YES
This information is provided in accordance with Title 8, California Code of Regulations, Construction Safety OrderSection1532.1 (p). 1/25/02
Name:
Revised on 3/14/2011
CITY OF PIEDMONT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 120 VISTA AVENUE, PIEDMONT, CA 94611
TEL: (510) 420-3050 FAX: (510) 658-3167
Construction & Demolition Debris Recycling Statement (DRS) Complete this form for all construction, demolition and/or renovation projects with a valuation of $50,000 or more. Please note that building permits will not be issued without a completed and signed DRS. A separate DRS is required for each building permit. Submit the DRS with your building permit application. Prior to the start of construction/demolition, submit a completed Drop Box/Dumpster Application. Please call (510) 420-3050 or visit the City’s website for additional information. Project Address: Building Permit No.:
Owner Name: ____________________________________
Address: ________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Phone: __________________ Fax: ___________________
Contractor Name: _________________________________
Address: ________________________________________
________________________________________________
Phone: ___________________ Fax: __________________
Project Valuation $ Project Type: Demolition Construction
Project Description:
Exclusive debris hauling by Franchised Hauler. The City Council has authorized a single franchised waste hauler, Richmond Sanitary Service, to provide debris boxes within the City limits. Contractors, or any other paid hauler other than Richmond Sanitary Service, may not remove debris for homeowners. Do not place non-recyclable material in the C&D recycling drop box! Please note that if the drop box intended for the collection of mixed recyclable debris is contaminated with debris that is not recyclable, the contents of the box will be treated as waste (non-recyclable material) and taken to the landfill. As a result, you may fail to meet the requirements of the C&D Ordinance. Verification of Compliance. Verification by Richmond Sanitary Service that the debris box was used exclusively for the purpose of collecting only materials on the List of Eligible Materials for C&D Recycling is required. When the project is completed and prior to final inspection, the Applicant shall submit collection receipt(s) from Republic Services to the Department of Public Works. Applicants that have salvaged or reused debris in order to comply with the 50% diversion goal are required to submit a Salvaged Materials Form (SMF).
I believe it is infeasible to recycle, reuse or salvage at least 50% of the debris generated by my project and would like to apply for an Infeasibility Exemption. I have attached a detailed letter that estimates the amount of debris from my project and states the reason(s) that I believe make my project uniquely unable to comply. My letter includes the project’s maximum feasible diversion rate, a list of each material the project will generate and the material’s estimated weight, and the maximum rate of diversion for that material.
The City of Piedmont C&D Recycling Ordinance requires at least 50% diversion from the landfill of job-site waste materials. I understand that I am bound to comply with the requirements of this Ordinance and will present all required documents related to this project for review. I further understand that if I do not meet the requirements of this ordinance, I could be subject to penalties as listed in Article II of Chapter 1 of the Piedmont Municipal Code. Applicant’s Signature Date Office Use Only DRS: Approved Denied Exemption: Approved Denied
Building Official: _________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________
F:\STOPWASTEorg\C & D\C&D Public Info-Handouts\Piedmont_SMF.doc
CITY OF PIEDMONT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 120 VISTA AVENUE, PIEDMONT, CA 94611 TEL: (510) 420-3050 FAX: (510) 658-3167
Construction & Demolition Debris Salvaged Materials Form (SMF)
Project Address: Building Permit No.:
Owner Name: ____________________________________
Address: ________________________________________
________________________________________________
Phone: ________________ Fax: _____________________
Contractor Name: _________________________________
Address: ________________________________________
________________________________________________
Phone: ________________ Fax: _____________________
Project Valuation $ Project Type: � Demolition �Construction
Project Description:
Deconstruction. Applicants for projects involving the removal of all or part of an existing structure shall consider deconstruction to the maximum extent feasible, and shall make the materials generated thereby available for salvage. Prior to the issuance of a Final Inspection Permit, the Applicant shall submit a Salvaged Materials Form that itemizes the materials salvaged, with an estimate of the weight and number of items, accompanied with receipts and/or weight tags from the salvage operation. Documentation of Salvaged Materials. Applicants shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that all materials salvaged are measured and recorded using the most accurate method of measurement available. To the extent practical, salvaged materials shall either be weighed by measurement on scales in compliance with all regulatory requirements for accuracy and maintenance, or for salvaged material for which weighing is not practical due to small size or other considerations, a volumetric measurement shall be used. For conversion of volumetric measurements to weight, the Applicant shall use the standardized Conversion Rates approved by the City for this purpose (See the attached Salvaged Materials Conversion Table). For salvaged materials or items that were donated or sold for reuse, an itemized list of such items specifying the weight, size and number of items shall be provided prior to the Final Building Permit Inspection, accompanied by receipts from the charitable organization or salvage operation receiving the items. Materials that can be salvaged or reused include:
wood beams, joists, studs, baseboards cabinets and cupboards railings brick doors and casings
windows bathroom fixtures light fixtures furnishings replantable trees, shrubs
Salvaged Items Weight in Tons1 Facility/Service Provider used2 1 Please refer to the attached Salvaged Materials Conversion Table 2 For assistance in salvaging materials at the jobsite, refer to the Builders’ Guide to Reuse and Recycling.
F:\STOPWASTEorg\C & D\C&D Public Info-Handouts\Piedmont_SMF.doc
TABLE OF TYPICAL MATERIALS GENERATED BY RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
MATERIAL YES NO SAL.
Aluminum – painted or unpainted, including windows √ Asphalt √ Bricks, crushed √ Bricks, whole √ Cardboard √ Carpeting √ Cinder Blocks √ Concrete √ Copper, unpainted and painted √ Dirt, clean fill w/ no rocks or concrete √ Drywall (unpainted) √ Drywall (painted) √ Electrical Wire √ Fiberglass √ Formica √ Glass √ Granite, fireplace surrounds, counters, floors √ √ Iron, painted, unpainted, wrought and cast √ Lead √ Linoleum √ Marble – fireplace surrounds, counters, floors √ √ Plaster √ Plant Debris √ Plastics √ Pressboard √ Porcelain – tubs, toilets, sinks √ Roofs – composition shingle, tar and gravel, cap sheet, synthetic √ Roofs – shake, shingle, concrete tile and clay tile √ Steel, including windows √ √ Stucco, separated from wire √ Tile – ceramic √ Tile - concrete √ Vinyl – windows, floors √ Windows √ Wood, unpainted, including lath w/ no plaster, shingles, shakes √ Wood, painted, stained or treated √
Key: Yes = material can be recycled currently by Richmond Sanitary Service or used as alternative daily cover No = the material is solid waste that will end up in the landfill Sal = Salvage material that may be resold through a salvage company
F:\STOPWASTEorg\C & D\C&D Public Info-Handouts\Piedmont_WWRP.doc - 1 -
Construction & Demolition Debris Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan (WRRP) This form must be completed for construction and demolition projects with construction valuation exceeding $50,000 and that have been approved to NOT use the hauling and disposal services of the City’s franchised waste hauler, Richmond Sanitary Service.
Building permits will not be issued without an approved WRRP. Separate WRRPs are required for each building permit. Submit with a building permit application to the Public Works Counter, City Hall, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611. Please read instructions carefully. Incomplete forms will be returned to applicant and may delay issuance of permit.
If you have questions, call (510) 420-3050. DO NOT ATTACH ADDITIONAL ITEMS.
1) Project Type (check one): New Construction Addition/Alteration Demolition 2) Size of Project ________________ sq. ft Project Valuation $___________________ 3) Estimated Start Date____/_____/_____ Estimated Completion Date___/____/____ 4) a. Briefly describe project (e.g. remodel kitchen, construct rear deck, etc.)____________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. How will scrap or waste materials be handled to ensure salvage, reuse or recycling? __________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. How will employees and subcontractors know of recycling plan and goals? ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Building Permit Application #: Property Owner:
Project Address: _______________________________________________
Contact Name: __________________________________ Title: _____________________________
Company: _________________________________________________________________________
Contact Mailing Address: ____________________________________________________________
City________________________________________ State____________________ ZIP__________
Phone: _________________ Fax: __________________ Email: ____________________________
For City Use Only: Permit No.___________________ App Filed ____/____/____ WRRP Submitted____/____/____
DR App. No. ________________ Received by ________
WRRP Approved____/____/____ By Conditions?
� 50% Diversion �Good Faith Effort �Approved �Conditional Approval � Not Approved
F:\STOPWASTEorg\C & D\C&D Public Info-Handouts\Piedmont_WWRP.doc - 2 -
REQUIREMENT: Recycle at least 50% of all construction and demolition debris (tons).
Instructions: Develop a plan outlining how much scrap and debris will be generated during construction or demolition and include handling methods for all materials. Complete the chart below and make sure your column totals are correct. The Builders Guide to Reuse & Recycling lists vendors and recycling centers.
Column A – Tons of scrap or debris for each material type. Refer to your materials take-offs. Use Materials Conversion Worksheet to convert from cy, sqft, bdft, etc. to tons Columns B, C, D – quantities to be salvaged or reused; recycled; or disposed. See worksheet for definitions. Column E –list vendors or facilities you plan to use for salvage or reuse, recycle, or disposal. Column Totals – Add up all quantities listed in Column A, B, C and D.
Material Type A B C D E (circle all that apply) Total TONS
Discarded Salvage or
Reuse* Recycling* Disposal* Proposed Destination(s) from
Builder's Guide
Asphalt/Concrete
do not add to total tonnage
Brick, Masonry, Tile Cabinets, Fixtures, Doors, Windows, Equipment
Carpet Carpet Padding Cardboard Ceiling Tile (acoustic) Drywall6 Drywall (unpainted new scrap or sheets)
Landscape Debris (brush, chips, trees, stumps, etc.)
Scrap Metal (all types) Wood, Pallets, & Lumber (clean & unpainted, no pressure treated wood)
Non-Recyclable Debris (indicate)
Other (indicate) Recyclable Mixed Debris §
* See instructions for definition of Salvage/Reuse
§ See instructions for Mixed Debris, Rebate Program and preferential pricing information.
7. Fill in the blanks below to calculate your recycling rate.
Column Totals B ___ + C ___ = ____ ÷ A ____ = _____x 100 = _____% 8. Is the percentage listed in #7 greater than or equal to 50%? � YES � NO If NO, explain why ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Print Name: ________________________ Signature:__________________________ Date___/___/____
City of Piedmont DROP BOX – DUMPSTER APPLICATION
C&D Debris Recycling Mandatory
If yes, a DRS is required to be submitted with building permit application. Project Address:
Property Owner:
Owner Address: Phone:
Dates Requested: From To
Location:
Reason for Drop Box: Construction Project -- Building Permit #
Other
Type of Drop Box: Mixed Recyclables Separated Recyclables
Green Recyclables Solid Waste (Trash)
APPLICANT (if other than above):
Name:
Company:
Address:
Business Phone: Cell Phone:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Must maintain a minimum of 20 foot egress for emergency apparatus.
2. No parking signs required across street from site of dumpster.
NOTE: All dumpsters must be ordered through Richmond Sanitary Service, (800) 320-8077
OFFICE USE ONLY: $30 FEE PAID ________ Date ___________ Permit No. ________________________
Approved Denied ____________________________________ ______________
Public Works Department Date
Approved Denied ____________________________________ ______________
Fire Department Date Faxed to Richmond Sanitary: ____________________________________ ______________ Date
please see reverse
By contractual agreement between the City of Piedmont and Richmond Sanitary Services, Richmond Sanitary has an exclusive right to provide Drop Box, Debris Box, and Roll-Off Box Services to Piedmont property owners. No other hauling company may provide those services for properties within the City of Piedmont. Prices charged by Richmond Sanitary Services are regulated by the contract between the City and Richmond Sanitary. The following exceptions apply:
Solid Waste Materials: Homeowners (not their contractor, subcontractor or other agent) may personally transport solid waste materials to a licensed solid waste disposal, transfer or processing facility. Recycling Materials: Homeowners may give recyclable materials to another hauling service or a recycling processor provided that no compensation of any kind is given to either the hauler or processor for the collection or disposal of the materials.
Drop Boxes related to Construction Projects:
Drop box applications, in connection with a construction project and building permit, are valid for the duration of the project. The contractor or homeowner may swap out boxes (a full for an empty, for example) or go through periods of interrupted service.
Drop Boxes for Other Uses:
Drop box applications, when requested by homeowners for personal use (cleaning out a house or garage, for example), are for ONE box only for the dates specified on the application. Should the homeowner need another box, either during the same time period or at another date in the future, another application must be submitted to the Public Works Department.
To make arrangements to have a debris box, drop box or roll-off box delivered to your residence for the collection and removal of either solid waste or recyclable materials, please complete the drop box application at the Public Works Office and allow 24 - 48 hours before contacting Richmond Sanitary Services at 800-320-8077.
APPENDIX F*
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS HAZARDOUS MATERIAL ABATEMENT DRAWINGS
*Hazardous Material Specifications and Drawings will be included in a separate submittal and incorporated into the report by reference.