+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Date post: 26-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: jlsk8death
View: 226 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
Archaeometry 44, 3 (2002) 469– 484. Printed in Great Britain © University of Oxford, 2002 TAPHONOMY AND EXPERIMENTATION C. DENYS Laboratoire de Zoologie Mammifères et Oiseaux—MNHN, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Many experiments have been conducted in the field of taphonomy in order to understand the effects of some agents and the associated pattern and process of bone modifications. A review of these experiments and the patterns of bone modifications is presented here. Numer- ous experiments focus on peculiar points of bone accumulation, mainly to gain knowledge about human habits and practices, but the action of some taphonomic agents has also been explored, among them, diagenetic processes. The striking feature of all these works are that they are localized, performed on non-statistical samples and without repeatability. Very few experiments combine different agents to fit more closely to the complexity of most fossil bone accumulations. KEYWORDS: TAPHONOMY, BONE MODIFICATION, DIAGENESIS, EXPERIMENTATION INTRODUCTION Taphonomy is the study of the laws of burial and fossilization and, by extension, of the palaeoecological biases resulting from the passage of an individual of a living community to a fossil one. Experimentation is a scientific method based on the systematic use of experiment in order to verify hypotheses. Like other historical sciences, taphonomy relies on uniformitarian assumptions for linking the present to the past. The patterns obtained from comparisons can lead to the formulation of hypotheses allowing us to elaborate models or protocols of experi- ments that need to be discussed and/or tested by experimentation and simulations, to reproduce some past patterns and recover some processes. Young (1989) argued that, under certain condi- tions, modern data replication experiments allow us to make generalizations about the past that are more powerful than the generalizations normally allowed by analogical reasoning. Experi- mentation has been used sporadically since the beginnings of taphonomy, but not systematic- ally. This discipline provides materials for this type of research, and here I will try to present some information on how experimentation has been used in taphonomy. Taphonomic processes are rather complex and still not yet fully understood. Among the main processes of bone concentration and alteration are digestion (for small mammals), transport, weathering, soil corrosion, trampling, burning and diagenesis (mineralization, changes in composition) (see Fig. 1). All of these processes are known to leave characteristic patterns of alteration and fragmentation on bone surfaces (Fernández-Jalvo et al. 2002), but the mech- anisms by which they operate cannot be studied without comparisons or experimental work. Moreover, the taphonomic agents that are responsible for the observed processes are not always identified. Here, we present a comprehensive, but not exhaustive, review of the literature of the differ- ent experimental works and the way in which they contribute to our knowledge of fossilization processes and site formation.
Transcript
Page 1: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Taphonomy and experimentation 469Archaeometry 44, 3 (2002) 469– 484. Printed in Great Britain

© University of Oxford, 2002

TAPHONOMY AND EXPERIMENTATION

C. DENYS

Laboratoire de Zoologie Mammifères et Oiseaux—MNHN, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France

Many experiments have been conducted in the field of taphonomy in order to understand theeffects of some agents and the associated pattern and process of bone modifications. Areview of these experiments and the patterns of bone modifications is presented here. Numer-ous experiments focus on peculiar points of bone accumulation, mainly to gain knowledgeabout human habits and practices, but the action of some taphonomic agents has also beenexplored, among them, diagenetic processes. The striking feature of all these works are thatthey are localized, performed on non-statistical samples and without repeatability. Very fewexperiments combine different agents to fit more closely to the complexity of most fossil boneaccumulations.

KEYWORDS: TAPHONOMY, BONE MODIFICATION, DIAGENESIS, EXPERIMENTATION

INTRODUCTION

Taphonomy is the study of the laws of burial and fossilization and, by extension, of thepalaeoecological biases resulting from the passage of an individual of a living community to afossil one. Experimentation is a scientific method based on the systematic use of experiment inorder to verify hypotheses. Like other historical sciences, taphonomy relies on uniformitarianassumptions for linking the present to the past. The patterns obtained from comparisons canlead to the formulation of hypotheses allowing us to elaborate models or protocols of experi-ments that need to be discussed and/or tested by experimentation and simulations, to reproducesome past patterns and recover some processes. Young (1989) argued that, under certain condi-tions, modern data replication experiments allow us to make generalizations about the past thatare more powerful than the generalizations normally allowed by analogical reasoning. Experi-mentation has been used sporadically since the beginnings of taphonomy, but not systematic-ally. This discipline provides materials for this type of research, and here I will try to presentsome information on how experimentation has been used in taphonomy.

Taphonomic processes are rather complex and still not yet fully understood. Among the mainprocesses of bone concentration and alteration are digestion (for small mammals), transport,weathering, soil corrosion, trampling, burning and diagenesis (mineralization, changes incomposition) (see Fig. 1). All of these processes are known to leave characteristic patterns ofalteration and fragmentation on bone surfaces (Fernández-Jalvo et al. 2002), but the mech-anisms by which they operate cannot be studied without comparisons or experimental work.Moreover, the taphonomic agents that are responsible for the observed processes are not alwaysidentified.

Here, we present a comprehensive, but not exhaustive, review of the literature of the differ-ent experimental works and the way in which they contribute to our knowledge of fossilizationprocesses and site formation.

Page 2: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

470 C. Denys

LivingBone

Organism

Population

Ecosystem

Destruction

Predation

Surface alterations

BURIAL

Reworking

Reworking

DIAGENESIS * recrystallization •Mineralisation •compaction

LEVEL SITE

SSOOIILL

Destruction

Soil corrosion, root etching, bioturbation, fragmentation

SSEEDDIIMMEENNTT

-Cooking, burning -Butchery, percussion-Decay, desarticulation -Digestion-Weathering -Trampling -Abrasion -Transport

FOSSIL BONE

Figure 1 A summary of the pre-burial, burial and post-burial processes leading to bone fossilization.

EXPERIMENTAL TAPHONOMY OF PRE-BURIAL PROCESS

Many processes lead to the formation of fossiliferous sites, and they are generally categorizedas either pre-burial or post-burial (Fig. 1). Taphonomic modifications may occur at all stages,from the living animal to the fossil. Experimental work may be carried out on different environ-ments and materials to check the importance or effects of various physical or biological agents.

Cooking and burning

One of the tasks confronting archaeologists and palaeoanthropologists that is relevant totaphonomy is to distinguish between the ‘natural’ and ‘cultural’ origins of an accumulation—this constitutes the field of archaeozoology. Differential preservation of mammalian bones atarchaeological sites leads to hypotheses concerning the natural or cultural origin of accumula-tions, and especially human consumption or use. It is easy to experiment into human activity,and this is one of the earliest fields of experimentation. For example, Lartet (1860) experi-mented with stone tools on fresh bones, to compare with prehistoric bones and interpret human

Page 3: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Taphonomy and experimentation 471

activity. Martin (1907–1910) experimentally broke mammal bones in an attempt to discern thecriteria that denoted a human fracture agent.

Some studies on heating, burning and boiling have analysed bone frequencies and aspectsafter experiments (Buikstra and Swegle 1989; Lubinski 1996), while other studies haveexamined bone chemistry and structure after these experiments (Shipman et al. 1984; De Niroet al. 1985; Richter 1986; Currey 1990; Grupe and Hummel 1991; McCutcheon 1992). Morerecently, Roberts et al. (2002) tried to characterize through experiments the effects of cookingon both inorganic and organic elements, as well as their interface. There are indications that firecontrolled by humans occurs around 2 Ma ago and is quite frequent at archaeological Holoceneand late Pleistocene sites. Fire is well recognized in sediments, but it is more difficult toappreciate on bone surfaces. This topic of archaeology has received much attention, but most ofthe experiments concern the physico-chemical signatures of burnt bones (Shipman et al. 1984;Villa et al. 1986; Brain and Sillen 1988; Walters 1988; Nicholson 1993; Sillen and Hoering1993; Stiner et al. 1995; Taylor et al. 1995; Wu et al. 1999). Other studies have observed theaspect of the burnt bones after stripping the flesh, or after drying or fragmenting them (Thurmanand Willmore 1981; Knight 1985; Gifford-Gonzalez 1989; Johnson 1989). Other protocolshave shown the difference between anthropic and natural fires (Bellomo and Harris 1990;David 1990; Bellomo 1991, 1993), while others have paid attention to the potential survival ofburnt bones (Walters 1988; David 1990; Stiner et al. 1995). The latter authors show that theseburnt bones are more fragile to diagenesis and trampling, while Gilchrist and Mytum (1986)concluded with the hypothesis that recrystallization that occurs when bones are not formed ofcalcinate reinforces the strength of the bone. Differences in colours and fragmentation, exfolia-tion and cracking are current patterns observed on burnt bone surfaces (Fig. 2 (a)). Costamagnoet al. (1999) have shown experimentally that bones may have been used as fuel in Palaeolithictimes.

Butchery, marrow extraction and percussion

At archaeological sites, bone surfaces show various marks that result from man’s activity, suchas percussion or butchery marks (Shipman and Rose 1983). These activities lead to somespatial patterns of distribution and fragmentation of bones, which generally allow us to interprethuman strategies of consumption and the type of site (Isaac 1967). However, especially inPlio-Pleistocene times, it may be difficult to distinguish between a natural Hyaena den and afloor occupation or a butchery site. In order to help discrimination, some authors have madeexperimental cut marks with different tools (Denys 1985; Walker and Long 1977), as well asobserving the results under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Shipman 1981) or throughbinoculars (Blumenschine et al. 1996). Many experiments on disarticulation processes withvarious techniques and tools can be found in the archaeological literature.

Decay and disarticulation

The role played by micro-organisms in the decomposition and disarticulation of bone is wellknown, but their effects on the bone surface are not yet well established. Many aspects ofdecay and disarticulation have been described after monitoring carcasses in the field in variousenvironments (Weigelt 1927; Toots 1965; Hill 1980; Blumenschine 1986; Potts 1988) but, forthis aspect of taphonomy, few works have attempted experimental approaches, with controlledparameters for time, carcasses and the environment.

Page 4: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

472 C. Denys

Figure 2 Pre-burial patterns and related experiments. (a) Burned bone, Matjies River Shelter, South Africa, layerP (×12). (b) Digestion on the tip of a fossil incisor of rodent (Pech Crabit, Oligocene) (×40). (c) Light to moderatedigestion on a rodent femur from a spotted eagle owl pellet (×20). (d) A detail of digestion (×70). (e) The distal partof a humerus after acid + pronase attack (×12) (after Denys et al. 1995). (f) The proximal head of a humerus afteracid + pronase attack (×42) (after Denys et al. 1995).

Simple experiments on decay, scavenging and disarticulation in a temperate fluvial settinghave been carried out by Bickart (1984), who placed carcasses of birds and pigs on a streamflood plain in Maryland for one year. Disarticulation took from 13 days to six months, andmany of the bones were damaged by the activity of scavengers. Micozzi (1986) observedthe effects of freezing, thawing and mechanical injury on the degradation and separation of

Page 5: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Taphonomy and experimentation 473

articulatory joints, while Janaway (1990) tested the effects on decay of the burial environmentof inhumation graves. Davis and Briggs (1998) placed carcasses—some protected by metalcages and some unprotected—in two field sites in southern Florida, to compare their relativerates of decay and disarticulation, as well as their weight loss, in order to interpret fossils fromsome famous lägerstatten deposits. They found similar sequences of morphological decay inboth environments (brackish swamp and marine embayment) and they used this experiment toproduce a predictive equation of weight loss versus elapsed time from death to stabilization ofthe carcass for fossil birds.

Another experiment, on two shot adult impala carcasses from South Africa, has been con-ducted over a few months. Different sub-regions of the carcasses were suspended on Acaciatree branches and treated once with insecticides. Daily visits allowed observation of the state ofdecay and the activity of large vertebrate scavengers and necrophagous insects (Ellison 1990).This work confirmed that the colonization of carcasses by insects is consistently related to thestate of decay, but for the two carcasses the timing and duration of the decay sequences weredifferent due to different scavengers (civet on one, serval on the other).

Digestion

Digestion occurs in medium to small vertebrates. It has been shown to act as a selective andsequential process. Enamel from rodent teeth is first etched, and then dentine and bone (Fig. 2(b)). On teeth and bones, it leaves characteristic traces that may be used efficiently to recognizethe origin of a predator at a fossil site (Andrews 1990; Fernández-Jalvo and Andrews 1992;Fernández-Jalvo et al. 1998). Generally, epiphyses and salient angles of bones are more stronglyaffected than diaphyses (Figs 2 (c) and (d)). Digestion can be easily simulated by using HClsolutions at various pH values, as in the stomachs of raptors, and some previous experimentshave shown the effects on the surface (Fernández-Jalvo 1992) and on the structure (Boyde et al.1978). However, as far as bone is concerned, we showed that to simulate the enlargement ofosteoblasts and the polishing effects of digestion, the acidity of the solution is not a sufficientfactor. The addition of enzymes was more effective than pH value and duration time (Denyset al. 1995; Figs 2 (e) and (f)). Human digestive effects have been tested by Crandall and Stahl(1995), who analysed faeces containing remains of digested skinned, eviscerated and segmentedinsectivores. Examination of skeletal element proportions, breakage and digestive damage showedthat human digestion produces category 5 predator modification according to Andrews’ classi-fication (1990), showing similar patterns to mammalian carnivore digestion. Another experimenton human digestion, and also that of pigs and dogs, was made on fish bones by Jones (1984,1986, 1990).

Experimental owl feeding by Dodson and Wexlar (1979) has allowed us to quantify, forthe first time, the bone loss and fragmentation due to digestion. Several captive owls werefed on house mice (Mus musculus), and this allowed the authors to develop a methodology ofcalculation of bone loss related to digestion and to shed light on differential preservationamong owls and bones. Similar experimental work has been carried out by Hoffman (1988)on a larger sample of predators with the same type of food (adult mice) and, similarly, quant-itative criteria were found allowing us to distinguish patterns of bone fragmentation in thefunctioning of raptor species. However, the latter author distinguished only between nocturnaland diurnal raptors, and failed to include in his results the smaller bones (vertebrae, metapodials,phalanxes and ribs), which may provide more evidence of discrimination, or of different preysizes.

Page 6: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

474 C. Denys

Gnawing

Many mammals are known to collect skeletal elements in their dens or in their territories forvarious purposes, one of which is to supplement calcium and phosphate in their diets, the otherbeing to prevent excessive growth of incisors. If squirrels, murids, rodents and shrews, as wellas some ungulates, have been recognized to behave in this way, the most effective actors arethe hystricids. Gnawing is characterized by the presence of multiple parallel striations thatmatch the width of the incisors, and by the removal of the articular ends of diaphyses (Brain1980; Maguire et al. 1980; Andrews 1990; Laudet and Fosse 2001).

Experimental feeding of captive porcupines (Hystrix indica spp.) in Israel has been con-ducted by Rabinovitch and Horwitz (1994) in order to verify some hypotheses of porcupinegnawing on middle Palaeolithic bones from Israelian sites. A previous study was made incaptive Hystrix africae-australis from the Cape region by Duthie and Skinner (1986), forphysiological research into the causes for such behaviour.

Lichens, algae and fungi

Lichens, algae and fungi are very abundant in nature and seem to have effects in degradingsome bone tissue structure (Fernández-Jalvo 1992; Fernández-Jalvo et al. 2002). Experimentalwork is currently being undertaken in this field (Fernández-Jalvo pers. comm.).

Weathering

Modifications produced by exposure of bones on the ground for various periods of time havebeen described in detail in different tropical environments by Behrensmeyer (1978) and Tappen(1994, 1995). Different stages have also been recognized both for large and small mammals(Andrews 1990) in the temperate wet climate of Wales (UK). Progressive cracking, splittingand exfoliation may lead to complete and more or less rapid bone destruction. A camel skeletonhas been monitored by Andrews (1995) in the United Arab Emirates. The animal died in 1984and this author observed the progressive dispersal of the skeleton until 1994. After 10 years ofaerial exposure, bones remaining at the surface reached stages 1–2 of Behrensmeyer, but buriedbones were protected from surface weathering (Fernández-Jalvo et al. 2002). On the Welshhills, a long-term monitoring project in Rhulen (Wales, UK) has allowed observation of theprocess of bone dispersal, burial, weathering, trampling, scavenging and predation (Armour-Chelu and Andrews 1996; Andrews and Armour-Chelu 1998) in a temperate environment.The skeletons of approximately 150 sheep, cows, horses, foxes, badgers and small mammalswere left undisturbed in the place of death at altitudes between 300 and 400 m in woodland,moorland and grassland environments. Initially, Andrews and Cook (1985) showed rapid dis-persal of bones and those in wet and sheltered conditions showed evidence of soil corrosionsimilar to those provided by carnivore-gnawing. After 12 years in Wales, some bones may bedestroyed without any of the signs of surface weathering shown by Behrensmeyer (1978) intropical environments. Other Welsh bones exposed without vegetation cover reached weatheringstage 1 of Behrensmeyer’s classification after 10–12 years and stage 2 by 19 years at the earliest).Burial of skeletons occurs for some bones after 3 years of exposure, but for others may takedecades.

In order to characterize the effects of frost on bones, Guadelli and Ozouf (1994) haveconducted two series of experiments. The first consisted of putting long bones, short bones,

Page 7: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Taphonomy and experimentation 475

teeth and antlers through daily freeze–thaw cycles between –5°C and +12°C for four years(1012 cycles) in a cold chamber. The second consisted of the creation of an experimental siteincluding five identical squares, with flint and faunal remains left in the South Alps at 3169 maltitude. From laboratory work, these authors concluded that bone fragmentation is not depend-ent on water content, differences in fragmentation being a function of the bone type. Thefragmentation pattern is very irregular. In the natural site, no conclusions have been reached atthe present time.

Trampling

Bones remains lying on the ground for a long period of time can be trampled by cattle or largemammals. This results in breakage or burial in the sediments, and in some gravel or sandy soilsfriction against sediments may leave some shallow, subparallel scratches on the bone shafts(Fig. 3 (a)). In order to look at some parameters of the soil and to prove the effects of tramplingon mammalian bones, experiments have been conducted by Courtin and Villa (1982), Fiorillo(1989), Behrensmeyer et al. (1986) and Olsen and Shipman (1988). These experiments havedemonstrated that trampling can produce scratch marks and have elicited criteria to distinguishthem from those produced by stone tool cut-marks. Fiorillo (1989) also described the effectsof trampling on the spatial arrangement of bones on different soil surfaces, by comparing theinitial disposition of experimentally oriented, aligned bones before and after the passage of acattle herd of 165 heads. This led to a randomization of the orientation of the bones, and ahigher frequency of trampling marks in sandy soil. In wet sediment, bones sank vertically,indicating the importance of the substrate for this type of bone modification.

Abrasion

In order to observe the different types of abrasion, and also in an attempt to understand somekinds of water transport action and processes, various experiments have been conducted. Largebones at various stages of weathering and fossilization have been abraded in a rotary tumblerfor fixed periods, and with varying sizes of silt, sand, gravel and pebbles, for small mammals(Korth 1979) with or without water, and for larger mammals (Andrews 1990). Weathered boneswere found to be abraded more rapidly than unweathered ones (Andrews 1995), and fossilbones moved faster than fresh and weathered ones (Fernández-Jalvo 1992). Breakage was alsorelated to the degree of weathering. The degree of rounding was found to be related to the clastsizes as well as breakage. Water action produces smooth, polished surfaces on bones (Figs 3 (b)and (c)), by contrast with bones that show weathering or corrosion.

Re-modelling bone surfaces of sub-adult macaque cranial bones have been subjected to waterabrasion, brushing, rubbing, exfoliation and chipping in order to characterize the micromorpho-anatomy of bone surfaces (Bromage 1984) and to distinguish this from possible interference dueto taphonomic modifications. Some effects of air-polishing on bone and teeth have also beendescribed by Boyde (1984) and d’Errico et al. (1984).

Transport

Some fossil bone accumulations result from accumulations in river channels or in deltaicenvironments. Transport by water has been studied experimentally by Voorhies (1969), Dodson(1973) and Boaz and Behrensmeyer (1976), who first showed that this process induces sorting

Page 8: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

476 C. Denys

Figure 3 Burials and related experiments. (a) Parallel striation characterizing trampling on a Holocene rodentfemur (×177). (b) The contrast between rounding and polishing (right) after water transport and soil corrosion (left)effects on the same skeletal element (Cainotherium phalanxes) at the Pech Crabit site (Oligocene) (×12).(c) A polished phalanx resulting from water transport (×30). (d) Bone corrosion by acid soil pH on anarchaeological fossil rodent femur (×15) (Monte di Tuda site, Corsica, Holocene). (e) An experimentallyaltered rodent distal femur after immersion at pH 2.35 for 21.5 h (×20). (f) Root marks on a Holocene rodentfemur diaphysis (×35). (g) A detail of the previous photograph (×88).

Page 9: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Taphonomy and experimentation 477

of bones Behrensmeyer (1975) described the behaviour of bones in water as a function of theirsize and density. She elaborated a method of using the quartz-equivalent of bones as a predict-ive value. Similar experiments have been carried out by Korth (1979) on small mammals. Thelast author also undertook experiments concerning the transport of owl pellets by water, andmeasured the distance and time of flotation and disintegration. Some other flume and riverexperiments in natural conditions are described by Hanson (1980), who attempted to modelsome aspects of water transportation and its associated deposit processes. In order to test theeffect of water on articulated bones, Coard and Dennell (1995) conducted flume experiments ina water stream. The main result of their study was that articulated bones displayed a greatertransport potential and that, in one species, the rate of movement was significantly faster thanwhen disarticulated.

EXPERIMENTAL TAPHONOMY OF BURIAL AND POST-BURIAL PROCESSES

Burial is a major process in fossilization and site formation, because it concerns the transitionfrom the biosphere to the lithosphere. It may be defined as the covering of faunal remains withsediment, which can be either mineralogical or biological, such as sand or vegetation, respect-ively (Lyman 1994, 406). It has been shown that this passage is not unique and sometimes mayoccur many times but, generally, better preservation is related to rapid burial, as shown experi-mentally by Meyer (1991) and probably with the absence of reworking and re-elaboration(Briggs 2001).

Soil corrosion, bacteria and fungal action

In addition to digestion, bones and teeth may be corroded by the chemical attack of the naturalacid soils, which produce relief-abraded bone surfaces, especially on epiphyses (Fig. 3 (d)).Experimental work (Fernández-Jalvo 1992; Fernández-Jalvo et al. 2002), has also shown thathighly alkaline sediments (pH 9–14) also produce alterations such as a surface exfoliation ofbone and dentine called ‘desquamation’, while enamel is not affected. Fernández-Jalvo et al.(2002) have shown that acid attack is very quickly effective (after 1 min) on human teethimmersed in 0.1 M HCl (pH ~ 1.7), while teeth immersed in 1 M KOH (pH ~ 14) showedmodifications only after 48 and 72 h.

In order to simulate different soil chemical conditions, small mammal carcasses were buriedat Rhulen, Wales, UK, in a peat bog with pH = 4.0, another sample was left for four years in acontainer with a little water, and a third one was placed in a solution derived from carbonatitevolcanic rock with pH = 6.0 (Andrews 1995). As a result, the bones in acid soil were etched,while the bones left in alkaline conditions showed little modification (Andrews and Armour-Chelu 1998). Other experiments have been conducted by immersing bones in solutions atvarious pH values, to simulate the pH of acid soils. At pH = 2.35, after 21.5 h some very lightmodifications occur (Fig. 3 (e)). After five days at pH 5, no significant traces of corrosion werefound in these bones (Denys et al., unpublished).

The burial of complete cadavers of various domestic animals, from the size of a rat to Bos(fresh or boiled), in a range of different soil types under controlled pH and drainage regimes ina temperate environment over seven years showed that almost all soft tissues disappeared, butfur, leather and hoofs survived in acidic soils (Nicholson 1996). The rate of bone loss andmodification could not simply be related to the soil pH and/or the inferred Eh. Bone modifica-tion varied greatly between animals of similar size and in geographically adjacent soils of

Page 10: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

478 C. Denys

similar pH and drainage. The state of the remains prior to burial played a role in acceleratingdiagenesis for boiled specimens.

Child (1995) found than across a range of 26 micro-organisms isolated from the soil andinoculated into fresh excavated sterilized archaeological bones, only 17% possessed collagenaseand then were able to use collagen as their sole nitrogen source. For this author, the soilchemistry had a greater influence on the types and microbial and fungal abundances of populationsof bones than the other way round.

At Overton Down, UK, an experimental earthwork was set up by archaeologists in 1961(Jewell 1963) in order to investigate fungal attacks, invertebrate attack, bone surface altera-tion and degradation of cooked bones. Part of the earthwork was excavated in 1993 and twobones were examined by Armour-Chelu and Andrews (1994). One sheep distal metapodial wasboiled for 1 h before burial in 1961 and the second showed surface degradation due to percola-tion of acid ground water. Additionally, fungal attacks had left multiple small-scale grooves onboth bones, and the experimental cut-marks, made during preparation of the bone prior toburial, were still visible. The experiment will continue for the next 32 years. At the site ofDraycott, Somerset, UK, two other experiments were undertaken in 1977 and are described inAndrews (1995). A single cow skeleton was naturally dispersed at the entrance to the cavesystem, providing a trampling pattern described by Andrews and Cook (1985). Few root markswere observed; nor was there either breakage or insect damage. The second experiment con-cerned some amphibian bones recovered inside the Draycott cave and then left exposed outsidefor 16 years. SEM observations showed incipient weathering and root and micro-organismattack (Andrews 1995).

Concerning some of the praecocial diagenesis aspects related to burial, one experimentattempted to define the speed of humic uptake in the collagen and the effects of differentchemical treatments to remove these humic acids (Van Klinken and Hedges 1995). Anotherdetermined the survival of albumin in experimentally buried fragmented bovine and humanbones in a suburban garden exposed to rainfall for a 26-month period (Cattaneo et al. 1995).The rate of survival was lower in those bones than in intact complete human bones that were4000 years old. The authors concluded that bone integrity is important for protein conservationand exposure of marrow and trabecular bone to water is the most significant factor for thesediagenetic changes.

Roots

Bone surfaces are currently affected by more or less deep sinuous crests that result from rootprinting. These roots may destroy the bone by splitting and increase the porosity by enlargingthe osteoblasts (Figs 3 (f ) and (g)). Experimental work is in progress (Fernández-Jalvo pers.comm.).

Bioturbation

Soil agents such as burrowing mammals are well known to disturb soil levels and are suspectedto be responsible for bone dispersion, especially at archaeological sites. Less well known is therole of earthworms as bioturbation agents, which was experimentally demonstrated by Armour-Chelu and Andrews (1994), and has allowed us for the first time to elicit criteria by which torecognize earthworm activity in palaeosoils. The stratigraphic consequences of such activity areimportant, because earthworms are able to move some bones 30 cm in depth.

Page 11: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Taphonomy and experimentation 479

Diagenesis

Once they are buried, bones are affected by new physico-chemical agents that may produceimportant changes in their mineral and organic structures, and in their chemical composition.In order to understand some of the numerous parameters that occur during diagenesis, someexperimental work has been undertaken. Water exchanges, soil pH and pressure may play animportant role in conditioning bones for early diagenesis. Similarly, the previous modificationsoccurring on bone may already have induced irreversible changes of bone structure and com-position. Time also plays an important role in diagenesis, and it is more difficult to deal with itin experiments, although the action of time is sometimes simulated by heating bones (Von Endtand Ortner 1984). However, some recent work on bone incorporation of trace elements showsthat time may not be the relevant factor, because some recently buried bones are modified morestrongly than older bones (Dauphin et al. 1994, 1999; Fernández-Jalvo et al. 1998).

Experimental dissolution of synthetic apatites at varying pH have allowed measurementof the changes in bone crystallinity using infrared spectrometry on the phosphate ν4 bandsplitting factor (Sillen and Le Gros 1991). Another similar experiment (Nielsen-Marsh andHedges 1997) showed that changes in the crystallinity of bone apatite occur independently ofthe degree of bone mineral dissolved and depend strongly on the ionic composition of the acidsolution.

Collins et al. (1995) have simulated the chemical degradation of ancient collagen, whileWaite et al. (1997) have studied DNA stability during artificial diagenesis.

EXPERIMENTS AND SITE FORMATION, TIME AVERAGING

Site formation is complex, as demonstrated by various kinds of taphonomic synthesis on fossilassemblages, and is very rarely a monophase process. Re-elaboration, mixing and reworkingprocesses may constitute a sequence of events through time that is called the taphonomichistory of a site. Only catastrophocoenosis may be regarded as a unique event of formation,called ‘time-specific assemblages’ by Behrensmeyer (1982). More frequently, either open-air orkarstic sites represent a more sequential history, with many phases of bone accumulation–dispersal episodes, and mixing may be frequent: according to Behrensmeyer (1982), these areeither ‘time- or spatial-averaged sites’.

Only one original experiment (TRAVEX; Carbonell et al. 1996) has attempted to reproducethe physical, biological, chemical and geological processes that may occur, simulating theenvironmental conditions and taphonomic and geomorphological modifications of a travertinerock-shelter site (Abric-Romani of Barcelona, Spain). The main physico-chemical features(temperature, humidity, pH and alkalinity) and rock-shelter structures were simulated in inde-pendent trays to observe their respective effects. The results of this experiment have not yetbeen published.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The examination of the experimental taphonomy literature shows that nearly all aspects arecovered by various experiments, except for some roots action. Globally, archaeologists havehad a more experimental approach than other disciplines. Some process are now well known,while some—such as decomposition at various levels, decay, human predation, gnawing, rootetching, insect action, bioturbation, reworking, bacterial and fungal attacks—are poorly studied.

Page 12: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

480 C. Denys

The experimental work remains timely and is generally not replicated. The samples used for theexperiments are in most cases too small to be statistically significant, and the protocols are notalways detailed in the published papers. These experiments have yielded information on physicalagencies and allow us to replicate patterns resulting from processes. In the field of diagenesis,the problem of time is generally solved by heating, which may not be the most appropriatemethod, bearing in mind the number of parameters that are involved in diagenetic processes,such as soil composition, bacteria, geomorphological transformations of soils, compaction,chemical modification of bones and soils, and climate, amongst others.

Very few experiments are devoted to successions of processes such as those occurring duringsite formation. It has been well demonstrated that each site may yield results that are due to itsown specific sequence of processes, and that these may lead to superimposed patterns of bonedegradation and chemical composition changes, between which it may then be difficult todistinguish (Denys et al. 1997a,b).

Moreover, to my knowledge there are at present no experiments on spatial or time averagingprocesses, even though their importance in the reconstruction of the taphonomic history of asite is fundamental. In this field, simulations of a mixture of elements may be the best way totest various hypotheses.

However, by limiting the number of variables in test situations, experimental taphonomy inthe laboratory helps to isolate factors that are important in the formation of fossil assemblages,and to build models to test the effects of these factors in natural situations.

REFERENCES

Andrews, P., 1990, Owls, caves and fossils, Natural History Museum Publications, London.Andrews, P., 1995, Experiments in taphonomy, Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 147–53.Andrews, P., and Cook, J., 1985, Natural modifications to bones in a temperate setting, Man, 20, 675–91.Andrews, P., and Armour-Chelu, M., 1998, Taphonomic observations on a surface bone assemblage in a temperate

environment, Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 169(3), 433–42.Armour-Chelu, M., and Andrews, P., 1994, Some effects of bioturbation by earthworms (Oligochaeta) on archaeo-

logical sites, Journal of Archaeological Science, 21, 433–43.Armour-Chelu, M., and Andrews, P., 1996, Surface modifications on bone, in The Experimental Earthworks Project

1960–1992 (ed. M. Bell), 178–85, Council for British Archaeology, York.Behrensmeyer, A. K., 1975, The taphonomy and paleoecology of Plio-Pleistocene vertebrate assemblages east of Lake

Rudolf, Kenya, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 146, 473–578.Behrensmeyer, A. K., 1978, Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering, Paleobiology, 4, 150–62.Behrensmeyer, A. K., 1982, Time resolution in fluvial vertebrate assemblages, Paleobiology, 8, 211–28.Behrensmeyer, A. K., Gordon, K. D., and Yanagi, G. T., 1986, Trampling as a cause of bone surface damage and

pseudo cutmarks, Nature, 319, 768–71.Bellomo, R. V., 1991, Identifying traces of natural and humanly controlled fire in the archaeological record: the role of

actualistic studies, Archaeology in Montana, 32(2), 75–93.Bellomo, R. V., 1993, A methodological approach for identifying archaeological evidence of fire resulting from human

activities, Journal of Archaeological Science, 20, 525–53.Bellomo, R. V., and Harris, J. W. K., 1990, Preliminary reports of actualistic studies of fire within the Virunga National

Park, Zaïre: toward an understanding of archaeological occurrence, in Evolution of environments and Hominidiae inthe African Western Rift Valley (ed. N. T. Boaz), vol. 1, 317–38, Virginia Museum of Natural History, Martinsville.

Bickart, K. J., 1984, A field experiment in avian taphonomy, Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 4, 525–35.Blumenschine, R. J., 1986, Carcass consumption sequences and the archaeological distinction of scavenging and

hunting, Journal of Human Evolution, 15, 639–59.Blumenschine, R. J., Marean, C. W., and Capaldo, S. D., 1996, Blind tests of inter-analyst correspondence and

accuracy in the identification of cut marks, percussion marks and carnivore tooth marks on bone surfaces, Journalof Archaeological Science, 23, 493–507.

Page 13: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Taphonomy and experimentation 481

Boaz, N. T., and Behrensmeyer, A. K., 1976, Hominid taphonomy: transport of human skeletal parts in an artificialfluviatile environment, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 45, 53–60.

Boyde, A., 1984, Airpolishing effects on enamel, dentine and cement: assessment of clinical and laboratory applica-tions, British Dentistry Journal, 156, 287–91.

Boyde, A., Jones, S. J., and Reynolds, P. S., 1978, Quantitative and qualitative studies of enamel etching with acid andEDTA, Scanning Electron Microscopy, II, 991–1002.

Brain, C. K., 1980, Some criteria for the recognition of bone collecting agencies in African caves, in Fossils in themaking (eds. A. K. Behrensmeyer and A. P. Hill), 107–30, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Brain, C. K., and Sillen, A., 1988, Evidence from the Swartkrans cave for the earliest use of fire, Nature, 336, 464–6.Briggs, D. E. G., 2001, Exceptionally preserved fossils, in Palaeobiology II (eds. D. E. G. Briggs and P. R. Crowther),

328–32, Blackwell Science, London.Bromage, T. G., 1984, Interpretation of scanning electron microscopic images of abraded forming bone surfaces,

American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 64, 161–78.Buikstra, J. E., and Swegle, M., 1989, Bone modification due to burning: experimental evidence, in Bone modification

(eds. R. Bonnichsen and M. H. Sorg), 247–58, University of Maine Center for the Study of the First Americans, Orono.Carbonell, E., Plaja, S., Canellas, J., Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Allué, E., Caceres, I., Diaz, R., Garcia-Anton, D., Gardella,

R., Guerrero, J. M., Hernandez, R., Manez, M., Pasto, I., Sala, R., and Vallverdo, J., 1996, Travex: travertineexperimental reproduction of a middle paleolithic site, Abric Romani (Barcelone, Spain), in II Reunion de Tafonomiay fosilizacion (eds. G. Melendez Hevia, M. Fernanda Blasco Sancho and I. Perez Urrestiu), 83–8, Institucion‘Fernando el Catolico’, Zaragoza.

Cattaneo, C., Gelsthorpe, K., Philipps, P., and Sokol, R. J., 1995, Differential survival of albumin in ancient bone,Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 271–6.

Child, A. M., 1995, Towards an understanding of the microbial decomposition of archaeological bone in the burialenvironment, Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 165–74.

Coard, R., and Dennell, R. W., 1995, Taphonomy of some articulated skeletal remains: transport potential in an artificialenvironment, Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 441–8.

Collins, M. J., Riley, M. S., Child, A. M., and Turner-Walker, G., 1995, A basic mathematic simulation of the chemicaldegradation of ancient collagen, Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 175–83.

Costamagno, S., Griggo, C., and Mourre, V., 1999, Approche expérimentale d’un problème taphonomique: utilisationde combustible osseux au Paléolithique, Préhistoire européenne, 13, 167–94.

Courtin, J., and Villa, P., 1982, Une expérience de piétinement, Bulletin, Société Préhistorique Française, 79(4), 117–23.Crandall, B. D., and Stahl, P. W., 1995, Human digestive effects on a micromammalian skeleton, Journal of Archaeo-

logical Science, 22, 789–97.Currey, J. D., 1990, Biomechanics of mineralised skeletons, in Skeletal biomineralization: patterns, process and

evolutionary trends (ed. J. G. Carter), vol. 1, 11–25, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Dauphin, Y., Kowalski, K., and Denys, C., 1994, Assemblage data and bone and teeth modifications as an aid to

palaeoenvironmental interpretations of the open-air Pleistocene site of Tighenif (Algeria), Quaternary Research,42, 340–9.

Dauphin, Y., Williams, C. T., Andrews, P., Denys, C., and Fernández-Jalvo, Y., 1999, Diagenetic alterations ofmicromammal fossil bones from Olduvai Bed I of the Lower Pleistocene sequence at Olduvai gorge, Tanzania,Journal of Sedimentary Research, 69(3), 612–21.

David, B., 1990, How was this bone burnt? in Problem solving in taphonomy: archaeological and palaeontologicalstudies from Europe, Africa and Oceania (eds. S. Solomon, I. Davidson and D. Watson), vol. 2, 65–79, Tempus, StLucia, Brisbane, Queensland.

Davis, P. G., and Briggs, D. E. G., 1998, The impact of decay and disarticulation on the preservation of fossil birds,Palaios, 5, 3–13.

d’Errico, F., Giacobini, B., and Puech, P. F. 1984, An experimental study of the technology of bone-implementmanufacture, MASCA Journal, 3, 71–4.

De Niro, M. J., Schoeninger, M. J., and Hastorf, C. A., 1985, Effect of heating on the stable carbon and nitrogenisotope ratios of bone collagen, Journal of Archaeological Science, 12, 1–7.

Denys, C. 1985, Nouveaux critères de reconnaissance des concentrations de microvertébrés d’après l’étude des pelotesde chouette du Botswana (Afrique australe), Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, 4è série, 7, A,4, 879–933.

Denys, C., Fernández-Jalvo, Y., and Dauphin, Y., 1995, Experimental taphonomy: preliminary results of the digestionof micromammal bones in the laboratory, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 321, série II a,803–9.

Page 14: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

482 C. Denys

Denys, C., Fernández-Jalvo, Y., and Laudet, F., 1997a, Biochronology and taphonomy: problems and solutions, inActes du Congrès BiochroM’97 (eds. J. P. Aguilar, S. Legendre and J. Michaux), Mémoires et Travaux de l’E.P.H.E.,Institut de Montpellier, 21, 55–65.

Denys, C., Andrews, P., Dauphin, Y., Williams, T., and Fernández-Jalvo, Y., 1997b, Towards a site classification:comparison of the diversity of taphonomic and diagenetic patterns and processes, Bulletin de la Société Geologiquede France, 168(6), 751–7.

Dodson, P., 1973, The significance of small bones in paleoecological interpretation, University of Wyoming Contributionsto Geology, 12, 15–19.

Dodson, P., and Wexlar, D., 1979, Taphonomic investigations of owl pellets, Paleobiology, 5, 275–84.Duthie, A.G., and Skinner, J. D., 1986, Osteophagia in the Cape porcupine Hystrix africaeaustralis, South African

Journal of Zoology, 21, 316–18.Ellison, G. T. H., 1990, The effect of scavenger mutilation on insect succession at impala carcasses in southern Africa,

Journal of Zoology, London, 220, 679–88.Fernández-Jalvo, Y., 1992, Tafonomia de microvertebrados del Complejo Carstico de Atapuerca (Burgos), Ph.D.

thesis, University Computense of Madrid, 559 pp.Fernández-Jalvo, Y., and Andrews, P., 1992, Small mammal taphonomy of Gran Dolina, Atapuerca (Burgos), Spain,

Journal of Archaeological Science, 19, 407–28.Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Denys, C., Andrews, P., Williams, T., and Dauphin, Y., 1998, Taphonomy and palaeoecology of

Olduvai Bed-I (Pleistocene, Tanzania), Journal of Human Evolution, 34, 137–72.Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Sánchez-Chillón, B., Andrews, P., Fernández-López, S., and Alcalá Martínez, L., 2002, Morpho-

logical taphonomic transformations of fossil bones in continental environments, and repercussions on their chemicalcomposition, Archaeometry, 44, 353–62.

Fiorillo, A. R., 1989, An experimental study of trampling: implications for the fossil record, in Bone modification(eds. R. Bonnichsen and M. H. Sorg), 61–71, University of Maine Center for the Study of the First Americans,Orono.

Gilchrist, R., and Mytum, H. C., 1986, Experimental archaeology and burnt animal bone from archaeological sites,Circaea, 4, 29–38.

Gifford-Gonzalez, D., 1989, Modern analogues: developing an interpretive framework, in Bone modification (eds.R. Bonnichsen and M. H. Sorg), 43–51, University of Maine Center for the Study of the First Americans, Orono.

Grupe, G., and Hummel, S., 1991, Trace elements studies on experimentally cremated bones. I. Alteration of thechemical composition at high temperatures, Journal of Archaeological Science, 18, 177–86.

Guadelli, J. L., and Ozouf, J. C., 1994, Etudes expérimentales de l’action du gel sur les restes fauniques. Premiersrésultats, Artefacts, 9, 47–56.

Hanson, C. B., 1980, Fluvial taphonomic processes: models and experiments, in Fossils in the making (eds.A. K. Behrensmeyer and A. P. Hill), 156–81, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Hill, A. P., 1980, Early post-mortem damage to the remains of some contemporary east African mammals, in Fossilsin the making (eds. A. K. Behrensmeyer and A. P. Hill), 131–52, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Hoffman, R., 1988, the contribution of raptorial birds to patterning in small mammals assemblages, Paleobiology, 14,81–90.

Isaac, G. L., 1967, Toward the interpretation of occupational debris: some experiments and observations, KroeberAnthropological Society Papers, 37, 31–57.

Janaway, R. C., 1990, Experimental investigations of the burial environment of inhumation graves, in Experimentationand reconstruction in environmental archaeology (ed. D. E. Robinson), 147–9, Oxbow Books, Oxford.

Jewell, P. A., 1963, The experimental earthwork on Overton Down, Wiltshire, 1960, British Archaeological ReportsInternational, London.

Johnson, E., 1989, Human modified bones from early southern plains, in Bone modification (eds. R. Bonnichsen andM. H. Sorg), 431–71, University of Maine Center for the Study of the First Americans, Orono.

Jones, A. K. G., 1984, Some effects of the mammalian digestive systems on fish bones, in Second fish osteoarchaeo-logy meeting (ed. N. Desse-Berset), vol. 16, 61–5, Centre de recherches archéologiques, Notes et MonographiesTechniques.

Jones, A. K. G., 1986, Fish bone survival in the digestive systems of the pig, dog and man: some experiments, in Fishand archaeology (eds. D. C. Brinkhuizen and A. T. Clason), 53–61, British Archaeological Reports InternationalSeries, 294.

Jones, A. K. G., 1990, Experiments with fish bones and otoliths: implications for the reconstruction of past diet andeconomy, in Experimentation and reconstruction in environmental archaeology (ed. D. E. Robinson), 143–6,Oxbow Books, Oxford.

Page 15: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

Taphonomy and experimentation 483

Knight, J. A., 1985, Differential preservation of calcined bones bones at Hirundo site, Alton, Maine, M.S. thesis,Quaternary Science, University of Maine at Orono.

Korth, W. K., 1979, Taphonomy of microvertebrate fossil assemblages, Annals of the Carnegie Museum of NaturalHistory, 48, 235–85.

Lartet, E., 1860, On the coexistence of man with certain extinct quadrupeds, proved by fossil bones from variousdeposits, bearing incisions made by sharp instruments, M. G. S. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society ofLondon, 16, 471–9; English translation published in 1969 in Man’s discovery of his past (ed. R. F. Heizer), 121–31,Peek Publications, Palo Alto, California.

Laudet, F., and Fosse, F., 2001, Un assemblage d’os grignoté par les rongeurs au paléogène (Oligocène supérieur,phosphorites du Quercy), Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, Sciences de la Terre et desPlanètes, 333, 185–200.

Lubinski, P. M., 1996, Fish heads: an experiment on differential bone preservation in a salmonid fish, Journal ofArchaeological Science, 23, 175–81.

Lyman, R. L., 1994, Vertebrate taphonomy, Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.

Maguire, J. M., Pemberton, D., and Collett, M. H., 1980, The Makapansgat Limeworks grey breccia: hominids,hyaenas, hystricids or hillwash? Paleontologia africana, 23, 75–98.

Martin, H., 1907–10, Recherches sur l’évolution du Moustérien dans le gisement de la Quina (Charente), Schleicherfrères, Paris, 3 vols.

McCutcheon, P. T., 1992, Burned archaeological bone, in Deciphering a shell midden (ed. J. K. Stein), 347–70,Academic Press, San Diego.

Meyer, C. A., 1991, Burial experiments with marine turtle carcasses and their palaeoecological signifiance, Palaios, 6,89–96.

Micozzi, M. S., 1986, Experimental study of postmortem change under field conditions: effects of freezing, thawingand mechanical injury, Journal of Forensic Research, 31, 953–61.

Nielsen-Marsh, C. M., and Hedges, R. E. M., 1997, Dissolution experiments on modern and diageneticallyaltered bones and the effect on the infra red splitting factor, Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 168(4),485–90.

Nicholson, R. A., 1993, A morphological investigation of burnt animal bone and an evaluation of its utility inarchaeology, Journal of Archaeological Science, 20, 411–28.

Nicholson, R. A., 1996, Bone degradation, burial medium and species representation: debunking the myths, an experiment-based approach, Journal of Archaeological Science, 23, 513–33.

Olsen, S. L., and Shipman, P., 1988, Surface modification on bone: trampling versus butchery, Journal of ArchaeologicalScience, 15, 535–53.

Potts, R., 1988, Early hominid activities at Olduvai Gorge, Aldine–de Gruyter, New York.Rabinovitch, R., and Horwitz, L. K., 1994, An experimental approach to the study of porcupine damage to bones: a

gnawing issue, Artefacts, 9, 97–118.Richter, J., 1986, Experimental study of heat induced morphological changes in fish bone collagen, Journal of

Archaeological Science, 13, 477–81.Roberts, S. J., Smith, C. I., Millard, A., and Collins, M. A., 2002, The taphonomy of cooked bone: characterizing

boiling and its physico-chemical effects, Archaeometry, 44, 485–94.Shipman, P., 1981, Applications of scanning electron microscopy to taphonomic problems, in The research potential of

anthropological museum collections (eds. A. M. Cantwell, J. B. Griffin and N. A. Rothschild), 357–85, Annals ofthe New York Academy of Science, 376.

Shipman, P., and Rose, J., 1983, Early hominid hunting, butchering and carcasses processing behaviors: approaches tothe fossil record, Journal of Anthropological Archives, 2, 57–98.

Shipman, P., Foster, G., and Schoeninger, M., 1984, Burnt bones and teeth: an experimental study of colour, morpho-logy, crystal structure and shrinkage, Journal of Archaeological Science, 11, 307–25.

Sillen, A., and Hoering, T., 1993, Chemical characterisation of burnt bones from Swartkrans, in Swartkrans: a cave’schronicle of early man (ed. C. K. Brain), vol. 8, 243–9, Transvaal Museum Monographs, Pretoria.

Sillen, A., and Le Gros, R., 1991, Solubility profiles of synthetic apatites and of modern and fossil bones, Journal ofArchaeological Science, 18, 385–97.

Stiner, M. C., Kuhn, S. L., Weiner, S., and Bar-Yosef, O., 1995, Differential burning, recrystallisation, and fragmenta-tion of archaeological bones, Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 223–37.

Tappen, M., 1994, Bone weathering in the tropical rain forest, Journal of Archaeological Science, 21, 667–73.Tappen, M., 1995, Savanna ecology and natural bone deposition, Current Anthropology, 36(2), 260.

Page 16: Denys, C. 2002 Taphonomy and experimentation.pdf

484 C. Denys

Taylor, R. E., Hare, P. E., and White, T. D., 1995, Geochemical criteria for thermal alteration of bone, Journal ofArchaeological Science, 12, 101–20.

Thurman, M. D., and Willmore, L. J., 1981, A replicative cremation experiment, North American Archaeologist, 2,275–83.

Toots, H., 1965, Sequence of disarticulation in mammalian skeletons, University of Wyoming Contributions to Geology,4, 37–9.

Van Klinken, G. J., and Hedges, R. E. M., 1995, Experiments on collagen–humic interactions: speed of humic uptake,and effects of diverse chemical treatments, Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 263–70.

Villa, P., Bouville, C., Courtin, J., Helmer, D., Mahieu, E., Shipman, P., Belluomini, G., and Branca, M., 1986,Cannibalism in the Neolithic, Science, 233, 431–7.

Von Endt, D.W., and Ortner, D. M., 1984, Experimental effects of bone size and temperature on bone diagenesis,Journal of Archaeological Science, 11, 247–53.

Voorhies, M. R., 1969, Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pleistocene vertebrate fauna, Know County,Nebraska, University of Wyoming Contributions to Geology Special Paper, 1, 1–69.

Waite, E. R., Child, A. M., Craig, O. E., Collins, M. J., Gelsthorpe, K., and Brown, T. A., 1997, A preliminaryinvestigation of DNA stability in bone during artificial diagenesis, Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France,168(5), 547–54.

Walker, P. L., and Long, J. C., 1977, An experimental study of the morphological characteristics of tool marks,American Antiquity, 42, 605–16.

Walters, J., 1988, Fire and bones: pattern of discard, in Archaeology with ethnography: an Australian perspective (eds.B. Meehan and R. Jones), 215–21, Australian National University, Canberra.

Weigelt, J. 1927, Rezente Wirbeltierleichen und ihre paläobiologische Bedeutung, Verlag von Max Weg. Translationby J. Schaefer, 1989, Recent vertebrate carcasses and their paleobiological implications, University of ChicagoPress.

Wu, X., Weiner, S., Xu, Q., Goldberg, P., Liu, J., and O. Bar-Yosef, 1999, Investigating the possible use of fire atZhoukoudian, China, Science, 283, 299a–299b.

Young, D. E., 1989, How powerful are archaeological inferences based upon experimental replication? in Bonemodification (eds. R. Bonnichsen and M. H. Sorg), 53–60, University of Maine Center for the Study of the FirstAmericans, Orono.


Recommended