Date post: | 17-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | colleen-higgins |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
Swiss Immigration Policies and their Impacts on the Economy
LSE-Conference on Migration
London, 27. June 2014
Prof. Aymo BrunettiUniversity of Bern
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
2
Content
1. Some Numbers2. Swiss Immigration Policy Regimes3. Economic Effects of Free Movement of Labor4. Regime Change 20145. Conclusions
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
3
1. Some Numbers
> An high share of foreign born people in Switzerland:
— USA: 12.9% (2010)— Canada: 19.5% (2006)— Australia: 26.8% (2010)— Switzerland: 27.6% (2012)
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
4
1. Some Numbers
> A strong recent increase of immigration:
Average immigration— 1982 – 2002: 90’000 per year— 2002 – 2012: 120’000 per year ≈ the population of Bern
Average balance of migration— 1982 – 2002: 25’000 per year— 2002 – 2012: 60’000 per year
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
5
1. Some Numbers
Source: Swiss Federal Statistical Office
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
6
2. Swiss Immigration Regimes
> The Regime between 1970 and 2002— Numerical limits for specific groups of migrants
> The Regime between 2002 and 2014— Free movement of persons
> The Regime after 2014— Numerical limits for all groups of migrants
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
7
2. Swiss Immigration Regimes
The Regime between 1970 and 2002:
> Quotas per economic sector
> Allocation politically decided=> High quotas for agriculture and low-skilled jobs
> Consequence: Low-skilled immigration=> After some years: Inefficient reallocation (see next slide)
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
8
The Regime Between 1970 and 2002Demand Driven Numerical Limits
Agriculture, low-skilled
jobs
Medium-skilled jobs(branch 1)
Medium-skilled jobs(branch 3)
Medium-skilled jobs(branch 2)
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
9
2. Swiss Immigration Regimes
The regime since 2002:
> Free movement of persons (FMP) vis-à-vis EU/EFTA
> Integral part of the bilateral treaties with the EU
> Freedom of establishment for EU/EFTA migrants with an occupation or «sufficient funds»
> Accepted by the Swiss population in a series of popular votes
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
10
The Regime Between 2002 and 2014Free Movements Of Persons
low-skilled jobs
Medium-skilled jobs
High-skilled jobs
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
11
3. Economic Effects of FML
> Immigration at the core of the latest rise in hours worked
Source: Michael Siegenthaler, Michael Graff, and Massimo Mannino, „The Swiss ‚Job Miracle‘“
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
12
3. Economic Effects of FML
> Foreign workers do not replace Swiss workers
Source: Michael Siegenthaler, Michael Graff, and Massimo Mannino, „The Swiss ‚Job Miracle‘“
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
13
3. Economic Effects of FML
Effects on hours worked:
> Fact: Swiss work force is decreasing (demography)> Fact: Immigration increases total hours worked
> Consequence: FMP offsets decreasing Swiss work force> Consequence: Eases continued rise in GDP
=> Effect on per capita GDP depends on ø productivity
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
14
3. Economic Effects of FML
Effects on human capital:
Immigrants under FMP are highly skilled:
— 1986-1994: only 15% of the immigrants were highly-skilled— 2002-2010: 51% of the immigrants were highly skilled
=> positive effect on average productivity likely
.
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
15
3. Economic Effects of FML
Effects on wages:
> Empirical evidence (Gerfin and Kaiser, 2011)— Little pressure on wages of highly skilled workers— Wages of medium and low-skilled workers rise
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
16
3. Economic Effects of FML
Effects on unemployment:
> Empirical evidence (increase)— Stalder (2010): Unemployment falls less quickly under FMP
> Empirical evidence (no increase)— Very low and stable unemployment rate— Siegenthaler et al. (2014):
– 65-80% of migration attributed to job creation in Switzerland– 50% have a job when they come
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
17
3. Economic Effects of FML
Other effects:
> Social security system benefits in the short term
> Possible upward pressure on real estate prices
> Pressure on infrastructure utilisation
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
18
4. Regime Change 2014
Referendum on a popular initiative:
> «Switzerland regulates migration independently.»
> «Significant decrease of the balance of migration»
> «Limited number of foreigners allowed to stay in Switzerland, using yearly maxima and numerical limits.»
=> February 9, 2014: 50.3% Yes
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
19
4. Regime Change 2014
Rual areas (pro) versus cities and the french part (contra)
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
20
4. Regime Change 2014
Economics: What if initiative is strictly implemented?
— Likely: Some bilateral treaties canceled– Market access of Swiss companies endangered– Free movement of Swiss citizens to EU endangered
— Back to the 70s?– Politics: Low-skilled immigration– Comparatively low growth benefits
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
21
4. Regime Change 2014
What next?
— Negotiations with the EU
— Implementation of the initiative text
— Likely: Popular vote on the outcome
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
22
5. Conclusions
> Low-skilled migration under numerical limits (before 2002)> High-skilled migration under FMP (after 2002)
> FMP with positive effect on Swiss wealth> FMP without negative effect on Swiss wages> FMP with little effect on Swiss unemployment
> FMP raised balance of migration> FMP raised concerns about migration
Departement VolkswirtschaftDepartement Volkswirtschaftslehre
23
5. Conclusions
> Uncertain future due to the February 2014 vote
> Possible outcomes:— Strict implementation: numerical limits— Mild implementation: combination of numerical limits and FMP— Non-implementation: FMP