Date post: | 17-May-2015 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | wendy-loewenstein |
View: | 924 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Adding Depth to DiscussionIDEAS Room Faculty Discussion SessionWendy GrojeanSeptember 2011
Blackboard Discussion Tools
Blog
Journal Entries-Group & Individual
Wikis
Discussion Board
Other tools…
Tumblr
Blogger
Edublogs
GoogleDocs
Wikis-Google Sites & Wikispaces
What have you used?
Tools & Pedagogy
Tools are not effective without good pedagogy.
Eight Tips for Facilitating Effective Online Discussion Forums
Examples of Expectations
1.The Do's and Don'ts of Online Student Communication
2. The Core Rules of Netiquette-Albion.com
3. Netiquette Guidelines-Paradigm Publishing
4. What expectations do you communicate with students?
Questioning
o Good questioning:
-Eliminates plagiarism
-Models good instruction for teacher candidates
• What questioning methods do you use?
Questioning Resources
o Question resources:
o McKenzie “Questioning Tool Kit”o Jamie Mckenzie questioning research article
: "Questioning as Technology”
o New Blooms Taxonomyo “Bloom’s Taxonomy Blooms Digitally”o Kathy Schrock’s Bloomin’ Google
Assessment of Discussions
Rubrics
Participation Points
What have you done? What works for you?
Rubric Resources
Sample Rubric –University of Pittsburgh
Tips and Rubrics-Middle Tennessee State University
Rubric example-University of Wisconsin-Stout
What type/style of rubrics work for you?
ReferencesChristopher, M., Thomas, J., & Tallent-Runnels, M. (2004, Spring). Raising the bar: Encouraging high level thinking in online discussion forums. Roeper Review, 26 (3), 166-171. Retrieved from Teacher Reference Center database. (12902668) Discussion board tips and pedagogy [Information Sheet]. (n.d.). Retrieved September 7, 2011,
from Middle Tennessee State University website:http://frank.mtsu.edu/~ webctsup/f aculty/ manual/W ebCTDiscussionBoard_Tips-Pedagogy.pdf
Frey, B. (n.d.). Rubric for asynchronous discussion participation [Rubric]. Retrieved September
9, 2011, from http://www.udel.edu/janet/MARC2006/rubric.html
Im, Y., & Lee, O. (2003-2004, Winter). Pedagogical implications of online discussion for
pre-service teacher training. Journal of Research Technology in Education, 36(2), 155-170.Retrieved from Teacher Reference Center database. (13036613)
McKenzie, J. (1997, November/December). A questioning toolkit. From Now On: The
Educational Technology Journal, 7(3). Retrieved from: http://fno.org/nov97/toolkit.html
References (cont’d)McKenzie, J. (2003, April). Questioning as technology. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal. Retrieved from http://questioning.org/qtech.html
Nielsen, L. E. (2010). Discussion rubric for online class [Rubric]. Retrieved September 9, 2011, from University of Wisconsin-Stout website: http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/discussionrubric.html
Owens, R. (2009, July 23). Eight tips for facilitating effective online discussion forums. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/a rticles/asynchronous-learning-and-trends/e ight-tips-for-facilitating-effective-online-discussion-forums/
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy [Guide]. (n.d.). Retrieved September 7, 2011, from Wayne County Schools website: http://www.techlearning.com/article/Blooms-Taxonomy-Blooms-Digitally/44988
Ross, S. (2011). The core rules of netiquette [Guidelines]. Retrieved September 10, 2011, from Albion website: http://www.albion.com/netiquette/corerules.html
References (cont’d)Rutkosky, N., & Seguin, D. (n.d.). Following netiquette guidelines [Guidelines].
Retrieved September 7, 2011, from Paradigm Publishing website: http://www.emcp.com/college_resource_centers/listonline.php?GroupID=6168
Tucker, C. The do’s and don’ts of online student communication [Guidelines]. Retrieved
September 8, 2011, from Collaborize Classroom website: http
://www.wecollaborize.com//pdf/student-communication-online.pdf