+ All Categories
Home > Documents > DESIGN AND PROPERTIES OF SPLIT MASTIC ASPHALT …

DESIGN AND PROPERTIES OF SPLIT MASTIC ASPHALT …

Date post: 09-Dec-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
DESIGN AND PROPERTIES OF SPLIT MASTIC ASPHALT MODIFIED WITH BAGASSE ASH THESIS Submitted to the Post Graduate of Civil Engineering Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Infrastructure ISSUED BY: NAME: ABDALLH .A.A.LHWAINT NIM: S9413902029 POST GRADUTE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA 2015
Transcript

DESIGN AND PROPERTIES OF SPLIT MASTIC

ASPHALT MODIFIED WITH BAGASSE ASH

THESIS

Submitted to the Post Graduate of Civil Engineering Program in Partial

Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Engineering in

Infrastructure

ISSUED BY:

NAME: ABDALLH .A.A.LHWAINT

NIM: S9413902029

POST GRADUTE

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA

2015

2

STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY AND CONTENT

PUBLICATION OF FINAL PROJECT

I declare actually:

1. Thesis by the title: “THE DESIGN AND PROPERTIES OF SPLIT MASTIC

ASPHALT MODIFIED WITH BAGASSE ASH” is my own work and has not

been submitted for any degree or other purposes, except has been mentioned on the

bibliography as reference of this paper. If in the future proved there is plagiarism in

this paper, I am willing to accept the sanction appropriate to legislation

(Permendiknas No. 17, 2010).

2. Publication of this Thesis on Journal or scientific forum should be permission and

include the counselor as author and PPs UNS as institution. In the period at least one

semester I did not do the publication of part or all of the contents of this thesis, the

Master Civil Engineering Program of UNS reserves the right to publish a scientific

journal published by the Master Civil Engineering Department of UNS. If I am in

violation of the terms of this publication, then I am willing to receive the applicable

academic sanctions

Surakarta, January 2015

Author,

ABDALLH.A.A.LHWAINT

NO.S 941302029

3

FOREWORD

Praise to Allah SWT the lord of the world, who has given mercy and blessing so that this thesis

with a title THE DESIGN AND PROPERTIES OF SPLIT MASTIC ASPHALT

MODIFIED WITH BAGASSE ASH..can be resolved. This thesis is submitted as a condition for

obtaining a master's degree in Civil Engineering Master Program of SebelasMaretUniversity.

Respectfully I say many thanks to:

1. Director of Civil Engineering Master Program of SebelasMaret University.

2. Dr. Ir. MamokSuprapto, M.Eng, as the head of Civil Engineering Master Program of

SebelasMaret University.

3. Dr. Eng. Syafi’I, M.T, as secretary of Civil Engineering Master Program of

SebelasMaret University.

4. Ir. Ary Setyawan, M. Sc.,(Eng), Ph. D as first supervisor.

5. Ir.Winny Astuti, M.Sc, Ph.D as second supervisor.

6. All faculty staff of Civil Engineering Master Program of SebelasMaret University who

have helped during lectures.

7. My brothers and sisters who always support at every condition.

8. Student colleagues of Civil Engineering Master Program of SebelasMaret University

who gave me inspiration and suggestion.

9. All those who helped me in completing this thesis, the author cannot mention one by

one.

I hope this thesis can contribute to the scientific academic community, practitioners in

the field of building materials and benefit the wider community in general. The assistance

that was given may receive just reward from Allah SWT.

Surakarta, January 2015

Writer,

ABDALLH.A.A.LHWAINT

i

TABLE OF CONTENT

STATEMENT OF ORIGNALITY ......................................................................................... i

FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................... ii

TABLE OF CONTENT ........................................................................................................ iii

LIST OF TABL..................................................................................................................... iii

LIST OF FIGURE................................................................................................................. iv

LIST OF APPENDIX ........................................................................................................... vi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. vii

ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ viii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background of the Study .................................................................................... 1

1.2 Problem Statement .............................................................................................. 2

1.3 Objectives of the Study ...................................................................................... 2

1.4 Limitation of the Study ....................................................................................... 3

1.5 Benefits of the Study ........................................................................................... 3

CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW AND BASIC THEORIES ............................. 4

2.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................ 4

2.2 Basic Theories ..................................................................................................... 6

2.3 Test Conducted by the Researcher ............................................................................... 18

2.4 Hypothesis.......................................................................................................... 18

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ........................................................... 19

3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 19

3.2 Location and Time ............................................................................................. 19

3.3 Variables and Parameters ................................................................................... 19

3.4 Data .................................................................................................................... 21

3.4.1 Types of Data .............................................................................................. 21

3.4.2 Data Collection ........................................................................................... 21

3.4.3 Materials ..................................................................................................... 23

3.4.4 Tools ........................................................................................................... 24

3.5 Preparation of the Mixes ....................................................................................... 30

3.5.1 Sieve Analysis .............................................................................................. 30

3.5.2 Static Indirect Tensile Test .......................................................................... 32

3.6 Tests ...................................................................................................................... 33

ii

3.6.1 Preparation of Sample for the Tests ........................................................... 33

3.6.2 Marshall test .................................................................................................. 34

3.6.3 Unconfined Compressive Test ...................................................................... 36

3.6.4 Static Indirect Tensile Test ........................................................................... 37

CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................. 39

4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 39

4.2 Material Preparation ............................................................................................ 39

4.3 Aggregate ............................................................................................................ 39

4.3.1 Sieve Analysis and Aggregate Distribution ............................................... 39

4.3.2 Aggregate Impact Value ............................................................................... 41

4.3.3 Specific Gravity and Water Absorption ........................................................ 41

4.4 Asphalt Test .......................................................................................................... 44

4.4.1 Penetration Test ............................................................................................ 44

4.4.2 Softening Point Test ...................................................................................... 45

4.4.3 Specific Gravity ............................................................................................ 46

4.5 Marshall Mix Design ............................................................................................ 47

4.6Indirect Tensile Strength Test (ITS) ...................................................................... 72

4.7 Unconfined Compressive Strength Test (UCS) .................................................... 75

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................. 78

5.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 78

5.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 79

References ............................................................................................................................ 80

iii

LIST OF TABLE

Table 2.1 Relative Performance of Stone Mastic Asphalt ..... ...............................................5

Table 2.2 Gradation Requirements for SMA Mixtures ......................................................... 7

Table 2.3 The Properties of Bituminous Binder and Aggregates Used for the Design of

Spilt Mastic Asphalt .............................................................................................................. 9

Table 2.4 Main Differences of Spilt Mastic Asphalt and Bituminous Concrete ................. 10

Table 2.5 Chemical Composition of Bagasse ...................................................................... 12

Table 3.1 Variables and Parameters ..................................................................................... 20

Table 3.2 Number of specimens .......................................................................................... 23

Table 3.3 Gradation Limits for Wearing Course ................................................................. 26

Table 3.4 Specific Gravity of Filler ..................................................................................... 28

Table 3.5 Design Bitumen Contents .................................................................................... 29

Table 3.6 Physical properties’ of Split Mastic Asphalt Components .................................. 29

Table 3.7 Marshal Test ........................................................................................................ 36

Table 3.8 Unconfined Compressive Test ............................................................................. 37

Table 3.9 ITS ....................................................................................................................... 37

Table 4.1 Limits of Aggregates Gradations ......................................................................... 40

Table 4.2 Aggregate Impact Value ...................................................................................... 41

Table 4.3 Specific Gravity of Coarse Aggregate ................................................................. 42

Table 4.4 Specific Gravity of water Absorption of Fine Aggregate test ............................. 43

Table 4.5 Specific Gravity of Bagasse ash .......................................................................... 43

Table 4.6 Penetration Value Of Asphalt .............................................................................. 46

Table 4.8 Maximum Specific Gravity of Spilt Mastic Asphalt (SMA) ............................... 47

Table 4.9 The Marshall properties of SMA without Bagasse Ash ...................................... 49

Table 4.10 Properties of The Split Mastic Asphalt (SMA) with Bagasse Ash .................... 54

Table 4.11 Properties of The Split Mastic Asphalt (SMA) with Bagasse Ash .................... 58

Table 4.12 Properties of The Split Mastic Asphalt (SMA) with Bagasse Ash .................... 63

Table 4.13 Results of Indirect Tensile Strength Test at OBC.............................................. 73

Table 4.14 Result of UCS Test at OBC ............................................................................... 75

iv

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 2.1. SMA Gradation ................................................................................................... 7

Figure 2.2: Correlation between Asphalt Content and Stability .......................................... 14

Figure 2.3: Correlation between Asphalt Content and Flow ............................................... 15

Figure 2.4: Correlation between Asphalt Content and Marshall Quotient .......................... 15

Figure 2.5: Correlation between Asphalt Content and VITM ............................................. 16

Figure 2.6 Correlations between Asphalt Content and VFWA ........................................... 17

Figure3.1 Materials .............................................................................................................. 23

Figure 3.2 Sieve Analysis Machine ..................................................................................... 24

Figure 3.3 Specific gravity and water absorption of coarse aggregate test ......................... 24

Figure 3.4 Specific Gravity Test of Bitumen ....................................................................... 24

Figure 3.5Softening Point Test (RING AND BALL TEST) ............................................... 25

Figure 3.6 Penetration index test ......................................................................................... 25

Figure 3.7 Specific gravity and water absorption of fine aggregate test ............................. 25

Figure 3.8 Gradation Limits for Wearing Course ................................................................ 27

Figure 4.1 Gradation Limit for Asphalt Concrete ................................................................ 40

Figure 4.2 Correlation Stability of SMA without Bagasse Ash toward Asphalt Content ... 49

Figure 4.3 Correlation flow of SMA without Bagasse Ash toward Asphalt Content ......... 50

Figure 4.4 Correlation MQ of SMA without Bagasse Ash toward Asphalt Content .......... 51

Figure 4.5 Correlation VFWA of SMA without Bagasse Ash toward Asphalt Content ..... 52

Figure 4.6 Correlation Air Void of SMA without Bagasse Ash toward Asphalt Content .. 52

Figure 4.7 Correlation Marshall Properties toward Asphalt Content .................................. 53

Figure 4.8 Correlation Stability of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ....................................... 54

Figure 4.9 Correlation flow of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash............................................. 55

Figure 4.10 Correlation Marshalll Quotient of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash..................... 56

Figure 4.11 Correlation Air void of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash .................................... 56

Figure 4.12 Correlation VFWA of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ....................................... 57

Figure 4.13 Correlation Marshall Properties toward % bagasse Ash .................................. 58

Figure 4.14 Correlation Marshall Stability Properties toward % bagasse Ash.................... 59

Figure 4.15 Correlation Flow Properties toward % bagasse Ash ........................................ 60

Figure 4.16 Correlation of MQ Properties toward % bagasse Ash...................................... 60

Figure 4.17 Correlation Air void of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ..................................... 61

Figure 4.18Correlation VFWA of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ........................................ 62

v

Figure 4.19 Correlation Marshall Properties of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ................... 63

Figure 4.20 Correlation Stability Toward % Bagasse Ash .................................................. 64

Figure 4.21 Correlation Flow of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ........................................... 65

Figure 4.22 Correlation MQ of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ............................................ 65

Figure 4.23 Correlation Air void of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ..................................... 66

Figure 4.24 Correlation VFWA of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ....................................... 66

Figure 4.25 Correlation Marshall Properties of SMA toward % Bagasse Ash ................... 67

Figure 4.26.Comparison of Stability test for SMA with 0,3, 4 and 5% BA ........................ 68

Figure 4.27.Comparison of Flow test for SMA modified with 0, 3, 4 and 5% BA ............. 69

Figure 4.28. Comparison of VFWA for SMA with 0, 3, 4 and 5% BA .............................. 70

Figure 4.29. Comparison of Marshall Quotient (MQ) for SMA with 0, 3, 4 and 5% BA ... 71

Figure 4.30. Comparison of Air void for SMA with 0, 3, 4 and 5% BA ............................. 72

Figure 4.31Results of ITS for each Type of Spilt Mastic Asphalt ....................................... 73

Figure 4.32 UCSTest ........................................................................................................... 76

vi

LIST OF APPENDIX

APPENDIX A=Laboratory Test Result.

APPENDIX B=Results of Marshal Tests.

APPENDIX C=Results of ITS.

APPENDIX D=Results of UCS.

APPENDIX E=Laboratory works.

vii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CRMB= Crumb Rubber Modifier Bitumen

CRM = Crumb Rubber Modifier

CRMSMA = Rubber modified Split Mastic Asphalt

BA=Bagasse Ash.

HMA = Hot Mix Asphalt

FBC=Flexible Pavement Committee.

PMB=polymer modified bitumen.

AC=Asphalt concrete.

PET=Poly ethylene Terephthalate.

IDT = Indirect Tension Test

ITS = Indirect Tensile Test

UCS= Unconfined Compressive Strength Test

OBC = Optimum Bitumen Content

PCI = Pavement Condition Index

SAM = Stress absorbing membrane

SMA = Split Mastic Asphalt

VFWA = Void Filled With Asphalt.

Abstract

Go green campaign is one of ways to save the earth from garbage. This campaign

not only suggests recycling and reducing but also reusing the garbage. In line with

the go green campaign, the aim of this study is to achieve the viability of using

Bagasse Ash (BA) as additive material in hot mix Split Mastic Asphalt (SMA)

with certain comparison which is expected to improve the quality of SMA.

This research was conducted by using experiment research design in comparison

among the three types of (without BA and with BA) properties of the hot SMA

toward the Marshall properties (stability, flow, Marshall Quotient (MQ), Void In

Total Mix (VITM), Void Filled Without Asphalt (VFWA),and Air Void to get

Optimum Bitumen Content ,Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) at different

temperature (20oC,40

oC,60

oC) and Unconfined compressive at same temperature

room at 27oC but different percentage of BA (3%,4% ,5%).

The results of this research are as follows: 1) the properties of the hot mix SMA

toward the Marshall properties are: The stability value of SMA with BA is higher

than SMA without BA by 3%; The flow value of SMA with BA is lower than

SMA without BA by 5.5%; The Marshall Quotient value of SMA with BA is

higher than SMA without BA by 5%; The Air void value of SMA with BA is

lower than SMA withoutBA by 3%; The VFWA value of SMA with Bagasse Ash

is higher than SMA without BA by 75.87%; The Air Void value of SMA with BA

is lower than SMA without BA by 2%.In terms of ITS value, the value of ITS is

high when BA is combined with low temperature; but when the temperature is

increased, the value of ITS decreases. Moreover, in terms of UCS, the value of

UCS of BA mixture is higher than SMA and higher than normal mixture at

normal temperature. The recommendation of this research is that a certain

percentage of air voids is necessary in all dense-graded mixes to prevent the

pavement from flushing, shoving, and rutting. Air voids may be increased or

decreased by lowering or raising the binder content. They may also be increased

or decreased by controlling the amount of material passing the No. 200 sieve in

the HMA. The more fines added to the HMA generally the lower the air voids.

The air voids may be changed by varying the aggregate gradation in the HMA.

Keywords: Bagasse Ash, Split Mastic Asphalt, ITS, UCS

V

Abstrak

Kampanye Go Green adalah salah satu cara untuk mengamankan bumi dari

sampah. Kampanye menggunakannya kembali. Sejalan dengan hal tersebut,

tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menggunakan abu ampas tebu sebagai bahan

aditif campuran aspal panas perpecahan (Spilt Mastic Asphalt/ SMA) )dengan

perbandingan tertentu yang diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kualitas SMA.

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan rancangan penelitian eksperimen

dengan membandingkan tiga jenis(tanpa abu ampas tebu dan dengan abu ampas

tebu) dengan menggunakan beberapa uji diantaranya (stability ,flow, Marshall

Quotient (MQ), Void In Total Mix (VITM), Void Filled Without Asphalt (VFWA),

dan Air Void untuk mendapatkan Optimum Bitumen Content,Indirect Tensile

Strength (ITS) pada suhu yang berbeda (20oC, 40

oC, 60

oC) dan Unconfined

compressive pada suhu kamar yang sama pada suhu 27oC tetapi pada persentase

yang berbeda untuk abu ampas tebu (3%, 4%, 5%).

Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut:Nilai stabilitas (stability) SMA dengan

abu ampas tebu lebih tinggi dari SMA tanpa abu ampas tebu sebesar 3%;Nilai

aliran (flow) SMA dengan abu ampas tebu lebih rendah dari SMA tanpa abu

ampas tebu sebesar 5,5%; Marshall quotient SMA dengan abu ampas tebu lebih

tinggi dari SMA tanpa abu ampas tebu sebesar 5%; Nilai Air Voiddari SMA

dengan abu ampas tebu lebih rendah dari SMA tanpa abu ampas tebu sebesar

3%;Nilai VFWA SMA dengan Retona lebih tinggi dari SMA tanpa abu ampas

tebu dengan nilai 75.87%; Nilai Air Void SMA dengan abu ampas tebu lebih

rendah dari SMA tanpa abu ampas tebu sebesar 2 %. Dalam hal nilai ITS, nilai ini

tinggi ketika abu ampas tebu di kombinasikan dengan suhu rendah; tetapi ketika

suhu di tingkatkan, nilai ITS menurun. Selainitu, dalam hal UCS, nilai UCS

campuran abu ampas tebu lebih tinggi dari SMA dan lebih tinggi dari campuran

normal padasuhu normal.Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini adalah persentase

tertentu dari rongga udara di perlukan dalam semua campuran padat untuk

mencegah jalanan dari pembilasan, dorongan, dan bekas roda. Rongga udara dapat

ditambah atau dikurangi dengan menurunkan atau menaikkan kadar aspal. Rongga

udara juga dapat ditambah atau dikurangi dengan mengontrol jumlah

agregatmelewati Nomor 200 saringan di HMA.Semakin banyak bahan halus

ditambahkan ke HMA umumnya dapat merendah kanrongga udara.Rongga udara

dapat di ubah dengan memvariasikan gradasiagregat di HMA.

Kata kunci: abuampastebu, Split MasticAsphalt,ITS,UCS

Vi


Recommended