Date post: | 25-Aug-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | trankhuong |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
U.A. Sachadel, P.F. Morris, P.D. Clarke
Tata Steel Europe
8th International Charles Parsons Turbine Conference
5-8 September 2011, Portsmouth, UK
Design of 10%Cr Martensitic Steels for
Improved Creep Resistance
in Power Plant Applications
2
For high efficiency and low CO2 emissions high steam temperatures are necessary in fossil fired power plants
Steels could compete with Nickel base alloys in application for components that are operating up to 650°C
620°C is the limit of operating temperature for current steel grades
The best currently available steel is 9%Cr Steel 92 (9%Cr, 2%W, 0.5%Mo)
There is a need of the development of steel suitable for operating under such condition
Average
worldwide
620°C
steam turb.
Average
Germany
700°C
steam
turbine
Efficiency [%]
Sp
ec
ific
CO
2 e
mis
sio
ns
[g
/KW
h]
Background
3
Development of long-term creep resistant steel for power plants of new generation
Criteria:
100,000 h average stress rupture strength of 100 MPa at well in excess of 620°C
Steam oxidation resistance at 650°C (10-12 wt.% Cr steel)
Low thermal expansion coefficient (excludes austenitic steels)
Objective
4
Current maximum temperature 620°C
Where have we got to? 620°C!!
Elements Used for Alloy Development
5
Principles of Current Work
• Systematic approach to alloy design
• Based on existing knowledge
• Use of thermodynamic modelling packages
• Optimise heat treatment
• Maximise alloy in solution on hardening
• Develop high volume fraction, smallest size, stable precipitate
dispersion on tempering
6
Tempered martensite
Abe, 2004 & 2008
Development
in creep
Why current 10-12%Cr tempered martensitic steels fail at
650ºC?
Precipitation and coarsening of CraVbNbcNd Z-phase
consuming existing fine (V,Nb,Cr)(C,N) [MX] or
(Cr,V,Nb,Fe)2(C,N) [M2X]
Coarsening of (Cr,Fe,W,Mo)23C6 carbides [M23C23]
Coarsening of FeaWbCrcModSie Laves phase
Inhomogeneous recovery near prior austenite grain boundaries
and lath/block boundaries of martensite
Laves phase
Not an issue
in 9%Cr
steels
Also in 9%Cr
steels
Creep strength loss in current 10-12%Cr steels at 650°C
7
Optimise C, N, B, Nb, V, Ta additions and heat treatments to control M23C6, MX, M2X and Z-phase
Optimise W, Mo and Cu to control Laves phase
Optimise Cr/Ni equivalents to avoid δ-ferrite (Cu, Co and Ni additions) but with a minimum of 10% for oxidation resistance
“Nitride strengthened” martensitic steel [dominant nanoparticles: M2X / MX]
Proposed Solutions
8
Wt% Steel A Steel B
Cr 10.0 10.0
Si 0.25 0.25
N 0.05 0.05
C 0.02 0.02
Ta 0.1
Nb 0.05
V 0.2 0.2
B 0.001 0.001
W 1.5 1.5
Mo 0.5 0.5
Cu 1.5 1.5
Co 1.5 1.5
Ni 0.5 0.5
Mn 0.3 0.3
Steam oxidation resistance
Solid solution strengthening / Laves phase
Single phase matrix (no δ-ferrite)
Stabilization of M23(C,B)6
Increased nitride content
Control of Laves phase
Decreased carbide content
Stable nitride strengthening effect (MX/M2X)
Use of Nb has implications for nuclear
applications
Design of chemical compositions
9
Effect Details Improvement in creep life compared
to Steel 92
High SHT
(Morris et al., 2010)
Increase in the SHT temperature from 1150
to 1200°C – needed for nitride precipitates
70%
at 650°C/110MPa
Fast cooling
(Yamada et al, 2002)
Application of fast cooling (WQ) from SHT
temperature instead of air cooling
90%
at 650°C/120MPa
Low Tempering
(Igarashi et al., 2001;
Sawada et al., 2008)
Lowering tempering temperature from 765-
770°C down to 550°C
90%
at 650°C/120MPa
Combined:
High SHT + low
Tempering
(Morris et al., 2010)
Increase in the SHT temperature from 1060
to 1150°C + decrease in tempering
temperature from 780°C down to 660°C
250%
at 650°C/110MPa
Design of heat treatment for new steels - objectives:
Dissolution of precipitates and no δ-ferrite formed on SHT
Fast cooling from SHT to avoid precipitation
Tempering optimised to ensure fine distribution of MX/M2X particles
Improvement in creep life due to the HT
10
Steel variant
Maximum temperature for
100% γ
(C)
Dissolution temperature (C)
Temperature A1
(C)
Steel A 1210BN MX (MN)
7631197 1212
Solution HT temperature: 1200°C
(confirmed no δ-ferrite formed at
1200°C)
Tempering temperature range: up to 740°C
MX
δγ
Solution HT temperature
Solution HT temperature
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
Temperature (C)
Wt
% P
ha
se
Liquid
Ferrite
Austenite
Cu
M23C6
MN
M(C,N)
BN
a)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
Temperature (C)
Wt
% P
ha
se
Cu
M23C6
MN
M(C,N)
a)
Heat treatments: thermodynamic calculations, JMATPro 4.1
(Steel A)
11
Solution heat treatment at 1200°C avoids the formation of delta ferrite and reduces the
fraction of undissolved particles in the steels
This should result in an increased fraction of precipitates on tempering, when
cooling from SHT is sufficiently fast
The tempering temperature should not be higher than 740°C (A1 temp)
Lowering the tempering temperature can result in a finer size distribution of all
precipitates and in the change of nano-precipitate (M2X instead MX), which is
considered to be beneficial for creep resistance (delay in formation of Z-phase)
The minimum temperature of the last step of tempering is estimated at 660°C, in order to
give some microstructural stability at the application temperature of 650°C
In previous work tempering temperature of 660°C resulted in excellent creep life of
improved Steel 92
If tempering can be done in steps then lowering the tempering temperature of the first
step of tempering could result in even finer distribution of all precipitates, with extended
stability of the microstructure during service ensured by controlled coarsening in the
second step of tempering at 660°C
Heat treatment
The results of the calculations are not suitable for the prediction of the composition change of
M2X with tempering temperature
Temperature of 700°C was chosen as the most suitable to extract some data for all investigated
steels
Calculations indicate that M2X phase at 700°C could be mainly Cr, V and Nb nitride
When compared with MX, fraction of M2X should be higher by factor 1.7
M2X
MX
Cr
N
Ta
V
C
M23(C,B)6Cr
C
Mo
Fe
Composition of MX
Fraction of MX
(wt.%)
600°C 660°C
at 600°C:
V47Ta4Cr3N46
at 660°C:
V45Ta4Cr4N46C
0.28
Composition of M23(C,B)6
Fraction of M23(C,B)6
(wt.%)
600°C 660°C
at 600°C:
Cr61Fe7Mo9WMnC21{46ppm B}
at 660°C:
Cr59Fe10Mo8WMnC21{70ppm B}
0.34 0.32
Composition of precipitates vs. temperature (Steel A)
13
Steel Compositions
Steel
Chemical composition, wt.%
C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni Al B Co Cu N Nb Ta V W
Steel
A*
Nom. 0.02 0.25 0.30 - - 10.0 0.5 0.50 - 0.001 1.5 1.5 0.05 - 0.1 0.20 1.5
Cast 0.034 0.25 0.35 ** 0.015 10.1 0.52 0.52 0.008 0.0012 1.5 1.5 0.056 - 0.1 0.21 1.5
Steel
B*
Nom. 0.02 0.25 0.30 - - 10.0 0.5 0.50 - 0.001 1.5 1.5 0.05 0.05 - 0.20 1.5
Cast 0.032 0.32 0.34 <0.01 0.013 10.1 0.53 0.52 ** 0.0013 1.5 1.5 0.061 0.06 - 0.21 1.4
Steel
92 Cast 0.11 0.33 0.48 0.012 0.005 9.05 0.46 0.22 0.007 0.0056 - - 0.053 0.065 - 0.22 1.85
Steel
92NCast 0.073 0.22 0.48 0.01 0.009 9.01 0.46 0.21 0.005 0.005 - - 0.065 0.068 - 0.20 1.73
* Morris et al., 2010
** Not measured
14
Heat treatment cycles of novel and reference steels
Steel variant (SHT)
Tempering
T1:
600°C/3h/AC
+660°C/3h/AC
T2:
660°C/3h/AC
+660°C/3h/AC
T3:
660°C/6h/AC
T4:
780°C/2h/AC
Steel A (1200°C/1h/Oil
quenching)Steel A-1200-T1 Steel A-1200-T2 Steel A-1200-T3 -
Steel B (1200°C/1h/Oil
quenching)Steel B-1200-T1 Steel B-1200-T2 - -
Steel 92 (1060°C/1h/AC) * - - -Steel 92-1060-T4
*
Steel 92 (1150°C/1h/AC) * - Steel 92-1150-T2 * - -
Steel 92N (1150°C/1h/AC) * - Steel 92N-1150-T2 * - -
Steel 92N (1200°C/1h/AC) * - Steel 92N-1200-T2 * - -
15
Test Conditions – Stress Rupture Tests
Steel
variant
110 MPa at
675°C
122 MPa at
650°C
A, B, 92 + +
92N +
- (lack of
available
samples)
16
Plain Stress Rupture Properties for Steels A, B, 92 & 92N
Stress rupture test results
Temp.
(°C)
Stress
(MPa)
Aim*
(h)
Plain Rupture Life (h)
Steel A
(10%Cr)
Steel B
(10%Cr)
Steel 92
(9%Cr)
Steel 92N
(9%Cr)
1200
600
660
1200
660
660
1200
660
1200
600
660
1200
660
1150
660
1060
780
1150
660
1200
660
650 122 1000 4868b 5792b 5825b 3861b 4001b 4002b 807b 7544b 7973b
675 110 363 1187b 1655b 1409b 2859b 2516b 906b 160b - -
* Aim lives based upon P92 with conventional heat treatment
17
LMP of Creep Data
0
50
100
150
200
250
29 30 31 32 33
LMP (T(C+log t)) x 10-3
Str
ess (
MP
a)
Steel A-1200-T1
Steel A-1200-T2
Steel A-1200-T3
Steel B - 1200 - T1 & T2
Steel B - 1200 - T1 at 675°C
Steel 92 - 1060 - T4
Steel 92 - 1150 - T2
Steel 92N - 1150 - T2
Steel 92N - 1200 - T2
ECCC (2005)
600°C (105h) 625°C (105h) 650°C (105h)
18
LMP of Creep Data – Estimate of 100MPa/10^5 Hour Temperature
0
50
100
150
200
250
29 30 31 32 33
LMP (T(C+log t)) x 10-3
Str
ess (
MP
a)
Steel A-1200-T1
Steel A-1200-T2
Steel A-1200-T3
Steel B - 1200 - T1 & T2
Steel B - 1200 - T1 at 675°C
Steel 92 - 1060 - T4
Steel 92 - 1150 - T2
Steel 92N - 1150 - T2
Steel 92N - 1200 - T2
ECCC (2005)
100MPa
600°C (105h) 625°C (105h) 650°C (105h)
19
Conclusions
• Two novel 10%Cr, low carbon steels have been designed in an attempt optimise long term creep properties in excess of the best currently available from martensitic steels
• The aim is to develop nitrogen-rich precipitates to optimise long term creep performance
• Versions containing both Nb and Ta as the high temperature carbo-nitride forming elements have been studied
• Heat treatments have been optimised to maximise alloy in solution after hardening
• High solution treatment temperatures and low temperature tempering have been used to develop a fine stable dispersion of MX/M2X precipitates
• Creep performance well in excess of conventionally heat treated Steel 92 were obtained
• Based upon relatively short term creep data (5kh) extrapolations based on LMP values suggest a 100MPa/10^5 creep life at temperatures approaching 640°C